China in the G20 Summitry Review and Decision-Making Process Alex He

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

China in the G20 Summitry Review and Decision-Making Process Alex He CIGI PAPERS NO. 46 — OCTOBER 2014 CHINA IN THE G20 SUMMITRY REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS ALEX HE CHINA IN THE G20 SUMMITRY: REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS Alex He Copyright © 2014 by the Centre for International Governance Innovation The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Operating Board of Directors or International Board of Governors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution — Non-commercial — No Derivatives License. To view this license, visit (www.creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). For re-use or distribution, please include this copyright notice. 67 Erb Street West Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6C2 Canada tel +1 519 885 2444 fax +1 519 885 5450 www.cigionline.org TABLE OF CONTENTS iv About the Author iv Acronyms 1 Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 A Chinese Review of China in the G20 Summitry 9 Foreign Economic Policy Making in China and Its Impact on China’s Participation in the G20 12 Conclusion: China’s Gains and Weak Points in the G20 Summits 13 Acknowledgements 14 Works Cited 20 About CIGI 20 CIGI Masthead CIGI PAPERS NO. 46 — OCTOBER 2014 ACRONYMS ABOUT THE AUTHOR BRICS Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa FSB Financial Stability Board G7 Group of Seven G8 Group of Eight G20 Group of Twenty IMF International Monetary Fund MAP Mutual Assessment Process NDRC National Development and Reform Commission Xingqiang (“Alex”) He is a CIGI visiting scholar. Alex is a research fellow and associate professor PBoC People’s Bank of China at the Institute of American Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). At CIGI, he is RMB renminbi focusing on interest group politics in China and SDR special drawing right their roles in China’s foreign economic policy making, China and the Group of Twenty (G20), WTO World Trade Organization and China and global economic governance. In 2009-2010, funded by the Ford Foundation, Alex was a visiting scholar at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University in Washington, DC. In 2008-2009, he was a guest research fellow at the Research Center for Development Strategies of Macau. In 2008, he participated in a short-term study program at the Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation at the University of California at San Diego, which was sponsored by the US Department of State. In 2004, he was a visiting Ph.D. student at the Centre of American Studies at the University of Hong Kong. Alex has co-authored the book A History of China- U.S. Relations and published dozens of academic papers and book chapters both in Chinese and English. He also periodically writes reviews and commentaries for some of China’s mainstream magazines and newspapers on international affairs. Alex has a Ph.D. in international politics from the Graduate School of CASS. Before beginning his Ph.D., he taught international relations at Yuxi Teachers College in Yunnan Province, China. Iv • CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE INNOVATION CHINA IN THE G20 SUMMITRY: REVIEW AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Under this model, each ministry makes its own policy in its respective field, but major economic and monetary As the largest emerging economy, China believes that policies are made collectively by top leaders in the State the Group of Twenty (G20), instead of the Group of Council and the Politburo. In practice, the Politburo’s Eight (G8), is the ideal platform for its participation in advisory group in economic affairs — the Leading Group global governance. The G20, as the primary forum for for Financial and Economic Affairs — acts as the highest- global economic governance in the view of some Chinese level coordinating agency and it is widely regarded as scholars, reflects the new balance of power in the global the core economic policy-making body in China. China’s economy — with 11 emerging economies now counted as policy concerning the G20 is crafted by several major members. China secured the chance to play the role of a economic departments in addition to the Ministry of responsible power within global economic governance by Foreign Affairs, and coordinated by a vice premier who joining the G20. is responsible for economic and financial affairs. The People’s Bank of China (PBoC) and the Ministry of Finance China participated positively in the macroeconomic play key roles in handling all financial issues, while the coordination in coping with the global financial crisis and Ministry of Foreign Affairs is responsible for all bilateral promoting the recovery of the world economy in 2008 and relations and multilateral affairs among the BRICS (Brazil, 2009. By introducing a ¥4 trillion (about US$580 billion) Russia, India, China and South Africa) leaders. stimulus plan before attending the G20 Washington Summit, China joined the United States’ call for China has gained immensely from its participation in the coordinated large-scale fiscal stimulus. It also committed G20. Most importantly, it gained entry to the centre stage US$50 billion to bolster the International Monetary Fund’s of global economic governance by participating in the (IMF’s) crisis-fighting capacity. China gained a great deal, leaders’ summits. The G20 at the leaders’ level represented both domestically and internationally, in the first three G20 and proved to be a perfect platform for the country to leaders’ summits, and experienced relatively little pressure demonstrate that it is a responsible great power, and to from developed countries. communicate and maintain relations with major powers. China’s critical weaknesses within the G20 summit In 2010 and 2011, as the emphasis in the G20 shifted from process, from the perspective of some Chinese scholars, “strong” growth to “sustainable and balanced” growth, are the lack of capacity for agenda setting and crafting a China increasingly found itself in a defensive position, as strategic framework for engaging with other G20 nations, it began to receive strong criticism from the United States as well as inadequate communication and coordination over its exchange rate policy. This shift also reflected a among different government departments and between growing lack of cooperation among G20 members as a the Sherpa and financial tracks of the G20. whole. Chinese scholars, however, provide an additional angle to explain the transition in the G20, arguing that INTRODUCTION there still existed a fundamental unwillingness by major Western powers to share leadership with emerging The Asian financial crisis marked China’s first major foray markets. into international monetary affairs. Faced with mounting balance-of-payments challenges in the region, China At the 2011 Cannes G20 Summit, China continued to made the decision to forego depreciating its currency, defend itself, and avoided harsh language in the final the renminbi (RMB), despite sharp falls in the currencies statement on China’s exchange rate while promising of many of its major trade rivals. This choice proved to enhance exchange rate flexibility. From 2011 to 2012, pivotal for helping crisis-wracked countries avoid further China cautiously dealt with, and carefully responded to, downward pressure on their currencies, thereby easing the European debt crisis. China pledged US$43 billion the adjustment process. This was a watershed moment for in the IMF resource increase as an appropriate way to China’s role in international economic affairs. For the first assist Europe, which was deemed to be a strong measure time, the Chinese government realized it could play an of China’s interest. China resumed playing an active active role in the global community. China subsequently role in the G20 by proposing an open global market and began to become more involved in international economic responsible macroeconomic policy, after pressure on affairs (Breslin 2011; Wang 2013; Zhou 2007; Shao 2008). its exchange rate and global imbalances was relieved in Being viewed as a “responsible power” began to emerge as 2013 at the St. Petersburg summit. It also insisted on its a popular slogan in China (Das 2013; Xinhua News 2010a). own agenda for international financial system reform; in particular, raising developing countries’ voting shares and It was also the Asian financial crisis that prompted Paul representation at the IMF and World Bank. Martin, then Canada’s finance minister, together with Larry Summers, then US Treasury secretary, to conceive Since the 1990s, economic policy making in China can of a forum to deal with threats to global economic and be described as a collective decision-making process, financial stability, which required the cooperation of not embodied in a “dispersed-centralized” governance model. ALEX HE • 1 CIGI PAPERS NO. 46 — OCTOBER 2014 simply the Group of Seven (G7) nations, but also emerging addition to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and coordinated economies, including China (Ibbitson and Perkins 2010). by a vice premier responsible for economic and financial The result was the creation of the G20 at the ministerial affairs. The PBoC and the Ministry of Finance play key level. roles in handling all financial issues, while the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is responsible for all bilateral relations and Through the subsequent decade, China took several multilateral affairs among the leaders of the BRICS. critical, albeit tentative, steps to increase its participation in the governance of global economic affairs. China joined The paper concludes that China has gained immensely the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 and played from its participation in the G20. Most importantly, China a significant role in the Doha Round of trade negotiations. entered the centre stage of global economic governance China also participated in climate change negotiations through the G20, which allowed the country to demonstrate under the United Nations Framework Convention on that it is a responsible great power, and communicate and Climate Change mechanism.
Recommended publications
  • SOUHRNNÁ TERITORIÁLNÍ INFORMACE Čína
    SOUHRNNÁ TERITORIÁLNÍ INFORMACE Čína Souhrnná teritoriální informace Čína Zpracováno a aktualizováno zastupitelským úřadem ČR v Pekingu (Čína) ke dni 13. 8. 2020 3:17 Seznam kapitol souhrnné teritoriální informace: 1. Základní charakteristika teritoria, ekonomický přehled (s.2) 2. Zahraniční obchod a investice (s.15) 3. Vztahy země s EU (s.28) 4. Obchodní a ekonomická spolupráce s ČR (s.30) 5. Mapa oborových příležitostí - perspektivní položky českého exportu (s.39) 6. Základní podmínky pro uplatnění českého zboží na trhu (s.46) 7. Kontakty (s.81) 1/86 http://www.businessinfo.cz/cina © Zastupitelský úřad ČR v Pekingu (Čína) SOUHRNNÁ TERITORIÁLNÍ INFORMACE Čína 1. Základní charakteristika teritoria, ekonomický přehled Podkapitoly: 1.1. Oficiální název státu, složení vlády 1.2. Demografické tendence: Počet obyvatel, průměrný roční přírůstek, demografické složení (vč. národnosti, náboženských skupin) 1.3. Základní makroekonomické ukazatele za posledních 5 let (nominální HDP/obyv., vývoj objemu HDP, míra inflace, míra nezaměstnanosti). Očekávaný vývoj v teritoriu s akcentem na ekonomickou sféru. 1.4. Veřejné finance, státní rozpočet - příjmy, výdaje, saldo za posledních 5 let 1.5. Platební bilance (běžný, kapitálový, finanční účet), devizové rezervy (za posledních 5 let), veřejný dluh vůči HDP, zahraniční zadluženost, dluhová služba 1.6. Bankovní systém (hlavní banky a pojišťovny) 1.7. Daňový systém 1.1 Oficiální název státu, složení vlády Čínská lidová republika (Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo; zkráceně Zhongguo) Úřední jazyk čínština (Putonghua, standardní čínština založená na pekingském dialektu), dále jsou oficiálními jazyky kantonština v provincii Guangdong, mongolština v AO Vnitřní Mongolsko, ujgurština a kyrgyzština v AO Xinjiang, tibetština v AO Xizang (Tibet). Složení vlády • Prezident: Xi Jinping (v úřadu od 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Powers and Global Contenders
    CHAPTER 2 Major Powers and Global Contenders A great number of historians and political scientists share the view that international relations cannot be well understood without paying attention to those states capable of making a difference. Most diplo- matic histories are largely histories of major powers as represented in modern classics such as A. J. P. Taylor’s The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918, or Paul Kennedy’s The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. In political science, the main theories of international relations are essentially theories of major power behavior. The realist tradition, until recently a single paradigm in the study of international relations (Vasquez 1983), is based on the core assumptions of Morgenthau’s (1948) balance-of-power theory about major power behavior. As one leading neorealist scholar stated, “a general theory of international politics is necessarily based on the great powers” (Waltz 1979, 73). Consequently, major debates on the causes of war are centered on assumptions related to major power behavior. Past and present evidence also lends strong support for continuing interest in the major powers. Historically, the great powers partici- pated in the largest percentage of wars in the last two centuries (Wright 1942, 1:220–23; Bremer 1980, 79; Small and Singer 1982, 180). Besides wars, they also had the highest rate of involvement in international crises (Maoz 1982, 55). It is a compelling record for the modern history of warfare (since the Napoleonic Wars) that major powers have been involved in over half of all militarized disputes, including those that escalated into wars (Gochman and Maoz 1984, 596).
    [Show full text]
  • China's 2017 Communist Party Leadership Structure & Transition
    China’s 2017 Communist Party Leadership Structure & Transition US-CHINA BUSINESS COUNCIL JUNE 2017 China’s 2017 Communist Party Leadership Structure & Transition June 2017 Executive Summary ● The 19th Chinese Communist Party (CCP) congress, in fall 2017, is expected to mark the beginning of President Xi Jinping’s second, five-year term as China’s top leader and fill other senior political posts. In the past, some second-term party congresses have signaled leadership succession plans for the next congress. ● The party congress not only chooses top party personnel, but also establishes policy priorities for the subsequent five years. These priorities are condensed into a political report delivered by the party’s incumbent top leader on behalf of the Central Committee. ● Leadership turnover could be significant. If previous party congress norms hold, many key national and provincial party leaders could be replaced for reaching the targeted retirement age of 68. This means five of the seven current Politburo Standing Committee members could retire, leaving only President Xi and Premier Li Keqiang to continue. Additionally, at least 11 of the 25 members of the Politburo are likely to retire, based solely on retirement age. Average turnover in the larger Central Committee has been 60 percent, based on age and other factors. ● Changes to the majority of senior positions within the party and the State Council, China’s cabinet, will be announced on an ongoing basis through the National People’s Congress in March 2018. As part of the transition, many key government officials whose work affects trade and commerce in China will retire or be promoted to new positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Downsizing Following World War I, World War Ii, Vietnam, and a Comparison to Recent Army Downsizing
    ARMY DOWNSIZING FOLLOWING WORLD WAR I, WORLD WAR II, VIETNAM, AND A COMPARISON TO RECENT ARMY DOWNSIZING A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE Military History by GARRY L. THOMPSON, USA B.S., University of Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Ohio, 1989 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2002 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burder for this collection of information is estibated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burder to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (FROM - TO) 31-05-2002 master's thesis 06-08-2001 to 31-05-2002 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER ARMY DOWNSIZING FOLLOWING WORLD WAR I, WORLD II, VIETNAM AND 5b.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commencement Exercises of the Academic Year 2020–21 Dickinson
    The Commencement Exercises of the Academic Year 2020–21 Dickinson College Sunday, May 23, 2021 Two O’clock The Commencement Exercises he first Dickinson College Commencement exercises were held Clerical gowns were worn by the earliest faculty but disappeared T in the Presbyterian church on the town square, and the occasion early in the 19th century. Curiously, students at Dickinson adopted was something of a public holiday. Professors and students marched the academic robes at Commencement before faculty, who did not in procession, first from the college buildings in Liberty Alley and appear in gown and hood until the procession of 1904. Previous then from our present campus. Each graduate gave proof of his generations of graduating seniors were distinguished only by their learning by delivering an address in Latin or English, a practice that affiliation with one of the literary societies—the red rose of Belles continued through most of the 19th century. In later years, music was Lettres or the white rose of Union Philosophical. During today’s introduced as a restorative between orations, and as the number of ceremony, graduating seniors who studied abroad during their graduates increased, the final oratory was reduced to one guest Dickinson careers wear the flags of their host countries on their speaker, rewarded with an honorary doctorate. academic gowns. The gowns worn by participants hearken back to the monastic In the college’s early days, a Latin ritual was included in the robes of the Middle Ages. The hood—worn by clergy and students Commencement ceremony, beginning with an inquiry by the for warmth in drafty halls—was retained in specialized cases, such president to the trustees: “Placetne vobis, viri admodum generosi, ut as academic distinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Shifts in Power and Geopolitical Regionalization
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Scholvin, Sören Working Paper Emerging Non-OECD Countries: Global Shifts in Power and Geopolitical Regionalization GIGA Working Papers, No. 128 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Scholvin, Sören (2010) : Emerging Non-OECD Countries: Global Shifts in Power and Geopolitical Regionalization, GIGA Working Papers, No. 128, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 20 • Issue 4 • February 28, 2020
    VOLUME 20 • ISSUE 4 • FEBRUARY 28, 2020 IN THIS ISSUE: Beijing Purges Wuhan: The CCP Central Authorities Tighten Political Control Over Hubei Province By John Dotson……………………………………………………pp. 1-6 Beijing’s Appointment of Xia Baolong Signals a Harder Line on Hong Kong By Willy Lam………………………………………………………...pp. 7-11 Fair-Weather Friends: The Impact of the Coronavirus on the Strategic Partnership Between Russia and China By Johan van de Ven………………………………………………...pp. 12-16 The PRC’s Cautious Stance on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Strategy By Yamazaki Amane…………………………………………………pp. 17-22 China’s Declining Birthrate and Changes in CCP Population Policies By Linda Zhang…………………………………………………….…pp. 23-28 Beijing Purges Wuhan: The CCP Central Authorities Tighten Political Control Over Hubei Province John Dotson Introduction: The CCP Center Presses a Positive Narrative About Its Response to COVID-19 Following a slow reaction to the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 virus, since late January the zhongyang (中 央), or central authorities, of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have conducted a concerted public relations effort to present themselves as actively engaged in directing efforts to combat the epidemic. This has included the creation of a new senior-level CCP “leading small group” focused on the epidemic (China Brief, February 5), and a messaging campaign to assert that CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping has been personally “commanding China’s fight” against the outbreak (Xinhua, February 2). Senior officials have also made a range 1 ChinaBrief • Volume 20 • Issue 4 • February 28, 2020 of recent public appearances intended to demonstrate zhongyang concern for, and control over, the campaign against the epidemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Great Power Competition in Southeast Asia JONATHAN STROMSETH
    THE NEW GEOPOLITICS APRIL 2020 ASIA BEYOND BINARY CHOICES? Navigating great power competition in Southeast Asia JONATHAN STROMSETH TRILATERAL DIALOGUE ON SOUTHEAST ASIA: ASEAN, AUSTRALIA, AND THE UNITED STATES BEYOND BINARY CHOICES? Navigating great power competition in Southeast Asia JONATHAN STROMSETH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Brookings Institution has launched a new trilateral initiative with experts from Southeast Asia, Australia, and the United States to examine regional trends in Southeast Asia in the context of escalating U.S.-China rivalry and China’s dramatic rise. The initiative not only focuses on security trends in the region, but covers economic and governance developments as well. This report summarizes the main findings and policy recommendations discussed at an inaugural trilateral dialogue, convened in Singapore in late 2019 in partnership with the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) and the Lowy Institute. A key theme running throughout the dialogue was how the region can move beyond a binary choice between the United States and China. In this connection, Southeast Asian countries could work with middle powers like Australia and Japan (admittedly a major power in economic terms) to expand middle-power agency and reduce the need for an all-or-nothing choice. Yet, there was little agreement on the feasibility of such collective action as well as doubts about whether the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has the capacity to create independent strategic space as U.S.- China competition continues to grow. Southeast Asian participants noted that Beijing has successfully leveraged its signature Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to expand its soft-power in the region, to the detriment of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • FICHA PAÍS China República Popular (De) China
    OFICINA DE INFORMACIÓN DIPLOMÁTICA FICHA PAÍS China República Popular (de) China La Oficina de Información Diplomática del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, Unión Europea y Cooperación pone a disposición de los profesionales de los medios de comunicación y del público en general la presente ficha país. La información contenida en esta ficha país es pública y se ha extraído de diversos medios, no defendiendo posición política alguna ni de este Ministerio ni del Gobierno de España respecto del país sobre el que versa. OCTUBRE 2020 los grupos étnicos de usar sus propias lenguas; hay seis lenguas principales China en China, además del Mandarín. Moneda: La moneda oficial de la República Popular China es el Renminbi (RMB), que se traduce como “moneda del pueblo, o Yuan (CNY). Cotización media del euro en 2019, 1 euro/ 7,73. Religión: Las religiones tradicionales de China son el Taoísmo y Budismo; RUSIA el Confucianismo es un sistema de conducta con enorme influencia en la KAZAJISTÁN historia del país. Estimaciones de los practicantes de las distintas creen- cias son difíciles de realizar. No obstante algunos cálculos señalan: Taoísmo MONGOLIA Heilongjlang (aprox. 20 millones); Budismo (aprox. 100 millones); Cristianismo: Católicos Urumchi Mongolia Interior Jilin (aprox. 5 millones), Protestantes, (aprox. 15 millones); Musulmanes: (aprox. KIRGUISTÁN 20 millones). Gansu PEKÍN COREA DEL NORTE Ningxia Hebel Forma de Estado: República. COREA DEL SUR PAKISTÁN Qinghai Presidente: Xi Jinping (desde marzo de 2013). Tibet Henan (Xizang) Vicepresidente: Wang Qishan (desde marzo de 2018). Anhui Sichuan Shanghai Primer Ministro: Li Keqiang (desde marzo de 2013). Zhejiang NEPAL Ministro de Asuntos Exteriores: Wang Yi (desde marzo 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Power Politics and the Structure of Foreign Relations Law
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2009 Great Power Politics and the Structure of Foreign Relations Law Daniel Abebe Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel Abebe, "Great Power Politics and the Structure of Foreign Relations Law," 10 Chicago Journal of International Law 125 (2009). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Great Power Politics and the Structure of Foreign Relations Law Daniel Abebe* I. INTRODUCTION Foreign relations law serves as an internal constraint on the unilateral exercise of foreign relations powers through the distribution of authority within the national government. Given the predominance of the executive branch in foreign affairs, courts routinely resolve questions regarding the breadth of the executive's authority by reference to the Constitution, legal precedent, historical practice, and functional considerations. Though courts generally focus on these domestic factors, they have been historically quite sensitive to the international political implications of their decisions. But we don't have a clear understanding of how or when courts consider international politics in resolving foreign relations law questions. We lack a framework to begin thinking about the relationship between international politics and the allocation of decisionmaking authority. This short Article frames foreign relations law as a function of international politics to explore the relationship between the strength of external international political constraints on a state and the levels of judicial deference to the executive in that state.
    [Show full text]
  • China's New Top Government Leaders
    China’s new top government leaders China’s state leaders were revealed on March 18th, 2018 at the conclusion of the 13th National People’s Congress (NPC). Most notably, the NPC approved a constitutional change abolishing term limits for China’s president Xi Jinping. Below are background profiles for the seven top government leaders. Compiled by Cheng Li and the staff of the John L. Thornton China Center at Brookings 1 Xi Jinping 习近平 Born 1953 Current Positions • President of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) (2013–present) • General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) (2012– present) • Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC) (2012–present) • Member of the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC) (2007–present) • Chairman of the National Security Committee (2013–present) • Head of the Central Leading Group for Comprehensively Deepening Reforms (2013–present) • Head of the Central Leading Group for Foreign Affairs and National Security (2013–present) • Head of the Central Leading Group for Taiwan Affairs (2012–present) • Head of the Central Leading Group for Financial and Economic Work (2013–present) • Head of the Central Leading Group for Network Security and Information Technology (2014–present) • Head of the CMC Central Leading Group for Deepening Reforms of National Defense and the Military (2014–present) • Commander in Chief of the Joint Operations Command Center of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) (2016–present) • Chairman of the Central Military and Civilian Integration Development Committee (2017– present) • Member of the Politburo (2007–present) • Full member of the Central Committee of the CCP (2002–present) Personal and Professional Background Xi Jinping was born on June 15, 1953, in Beijing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disharmony of the Spheres the U.S
    The Disharmony of the Spheres The U.S. will endanger itself if it accedes to Russian and Chinese efforts to change the international system to their liking By Hal Brands and Charles Edel AKING THE STAGE at Westmin- A “sphere of influence” is traditionally under- ster College in March 1946, Win- stood as a geographical zone within which the most ston Churchill told his audience he powerful actor can impose its will. And nearly three “felt bound to portray the shadow decades after the close of the superpower struggle which…falls upon the world.” The that Churchill’s speech heralded, spheres of influence former British prime minister fa- are back. At both ends of the Eurasian landmass, the mously declared that “from Stettin authoritarian regimes in China and Russia are carv- in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain ing out areas of privileged influence—geographic hasT descended across the Continent.” He went on to ex- buffer zones in which they exercise diplomatic, eco- plain that “Warsaw, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, nomic, and military primacy. China and Russia are Belgrade, Bucharest, and Sofia all…lie in what I must seeking to coerce and overawe their neighbors. They call the Soviet sphere.” Though the Westminster ad- are endeavoring to weaken the international rules dress is best remembered for the phrase “iron curtain,” and norms—and the influence of opposing powers— the way it called attention to an emerging Soviet sphere that stand athwart their ambitions in their respective of influence is far more relevant to today’s world.
    [Show full text]