DOCSLIB.ORG

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization The Shanghai Cooperation Organization SIPRI Policy Paper No. 17 Alyson J. K. Bailes, Pál Dunay, Pan Guang and Mikhail Troitskiy Stockholm International Peace Research Institute May 2007 © SIPRI, 2007 ISSN 1652-0432 (print) ISSN 1653-7548 (online) Printed in Sweden by CM Gruppen, Bromma Contents Preface iv Abbreviations and acronyms v Map of member and observer states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization vi Table A.1. Basic data for the member and observer states of the Shanghai vi Cooperation Organization, 2005 1. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a regional security 1 institution Alyson J. K. Bailes and Pál Dunay The background and purpose of this assessment 1 Origins and basic features 3 The Shanghai Cooperation Organization members and their interests 8 The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and its members’ security 20 Evaluation and conclusions 27 2. A Russian perspective on the Shanghai Cooperation Organization 30 Mikhail Troitskiy Introduction 30 Russia in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization 31 Russia and the substance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s work 35 Looking ahead 40 In conclusion: Russia’s general vision 44 3. A Chinese perspective on the Shanghai Cooperation Organization 45 Pan Guang Introduction 45 The strategic significance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization for China 45 The demonstrative role of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in Chinese 46 diplomacy China’s driving role in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization 48 The substance of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s work: achievements 50 and challenges Looking ahead: big tasks and a long journey 55 In conclusion: key points 58 About the authors 59 Preface There is a clear trend in the 21st century for regional organizations to multiply, to become more multifunctional and to devote themselves in whole or part to security goals. Old-style alliances with a defined opponent are now rare, and most groups address themselves to the reduction of conflict (internally or externally) and to transnational challenges such as terrorism. It is no coincidence that regions where these structures are absent or weak are also those with the greatest remaining problems of interstate tension or internal violence. While all these phenomena are somewhat under-researched, the forms taken by multilateralism in the area of the former Soviet Union have been particularly little studied. There is a widespread assumption in the West that, because they involve imperfectly democratic states and often reject externally defined norms of govern- ance, such groups are bound to be illegitimate or ineffective or both. This Policy Paper sets out to test and challenge such generalized views by looking in detail at the most dynamic and complex of such groupings, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Founded in 2001, the SCO includes China as well as the Russian Federation and the Central Asian states Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Its deeper goals thus include managing potential Sino-Russian tensions or com- petition, but its overt activities are directed first at transnational threats and, add- itionally, at economic and infrastructure cooperation. The present study seeks to illuminate the motives and experiences of the SCO’s members—with the help of two chapters contributed by a Russian and a Chinese expert, respectively—and to offer a dispassionate analysis of the organization’s qualities, strengths, weaknesses and effects. The judgements that emerge are mixed but include the recognition that the SCO makes some real impact on the security of the wide territories it covers and that it has real potential for further development. This Policy Paper forms part of a SIPRI study programme on modern regional security institutions and has benefited from specific project support by the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs. I would like to thank Pan Guang and Mikhail Troitskiy for their independent contributions; my co-author for the opening chap- ter, Pál Dunay; and David Cruickshank for the editing. Alyson J. K. Bailes Director, SIPRI May 2007 Abbreviations and acronyms ARF ASEAN Regional Forum ASEAN Association of South East Asian Nations CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CSTO Collective Security Treaty Organization ETIM East Turkestan Islamic Movement EU European Union EURASEC Eurasian Economic Community NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization OSCE Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe PFP Partnership for Peace RATS Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure SCO Shanghai Cooperation Organization UN United Nations Moscow RUSSIA Astana KAZAKHSTAN Ulan Bator MONGOLIA Beijing UZBEKISTAN Bishkek Tashkent Dushanbe KYRGYZSTAN Tehran TAJIKISTAN IRAN CHINA Islamabad PAKISTAN New Delhi INDIA SCO member state SCO observer state 0 1000 km Map of member and observer states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Table A.1. Basic data for the member states of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, 2005 Area Population GDP GDP per Military expend- State (km2) (m.) (US$ b.) capita (US$) iture (US$ m.) China 9 572 900 1 315.8 2 244 1 715 44 300 Kazakhstan 2 724 900 14.8 57 3 786 592 Kyrgyzstan 199 900 5.3 2 477 76 Russia 17 075 400 143.5 764 5 323 31 100 Tajikistan 143 100 6.5 2 364 . Uzbekistan 447 400 26.6 14 521 . = figure not available; GDP = gross domestic product. Sources: Area and population: Turner, B. (ed.), The Statesman’s Yearbook 2007 (Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, 2006); GDP: International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Eco- nomic Outlook Database, Apr. 2007, URL <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2007/ 01/data/index.aspx>; Military expenditure: SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. 1. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a regional security institution ALYSON J. K. BAILES and PÁL DUNAY* The background and purpose of this assessment Established in 2001 with China, the Russian Federation, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan as members, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has remained one of the world’s least-known and least-analysed multilateral groups. It makes little effort itself for transparency and is only patchily institution- alized in any case.1 Such useful research materials as are available on it are often in Chinese or Russian.2 Outside its participant countries, the SCO has attracted mainly sceptical and negative comment: some questioning whether it has anything more than symbolic substance, others criticizing the lack of democratic credentials of its members and questioning the legitimacy of their various policies. These points have been made especially strongly by commentators in the United States following the inclusion of Iran—along with India, Pakistan and Mongolia—as an SCO observer state and hints that it may attain full membership.3 The time is now ripe to attempt a more serious and, so far as possible, objective analysis of what the SCO is, what it means for its members and for the outside 1 The English-language section of the SCO website at URL <http://www.sectsco.org/> provides the organization’s basic documents. Some of its sections, such as ‘Media on SCO’, have little content and in general it does not reflect new developments in a timely fashion. 2 For a sample of the Russian literature see Lukin, A. V. and Mochulskiy, A. F., ‘Shankhaiskaya organizatsiya sotrudnichestva: strukturnoye oformleniye i perspektiy razvitiya [Shanghai Cooperation Organization: structural formation and perspectives of development], Analiticheskiye Zapiski, no. 2(4) (Feb. 2005). For a good Chinese analysis (in Russian) see Chzhao Huashen, Kitai, Tsentral'naya Aziya i Shankhaiskaya Organizatsiya Sotrudnichestva [China, Central Asia and the Shanghai Cooper- ation Organization], Carnegie Moscow Center Working Paper 5/2005 (Carnegie Moscow Center: Moscow, 2005), URL <http://www.carnegie.ru/en/pubs/workpapers/73064.htm>. 3 Before the SCO’s 2006 Shanghai summit, the US Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, com- mented on Iran’s application for full membership that ‘To think they should be brought into an organ- ization with the hope that it would contribute to an anti-terrorist activity, strikes me as unusual.’ Quoted in Saidazimova, G., ‘Eurasia: observer Iran grabs limelight ahead of Shanghai alliance anni- versary’, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 13 June 2006, URL <http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/ 2006/06/1c64fc44-9081-49f0-8b69-2c144f52dcab.html>. * This chapter is based in part on Bailes, A. J. K., Baranovsky, V. and Dunay, P., ‘Regional security cooperation in the former Soviet area’, SIPRI Yearbook 2007: Armaments, Dis- armament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, forthcoming 2007), pp. 165–92. 2 THE SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION world and what direction it may be evolving in. First, it is clear that the SCO is here to stay. It has developed the self-elaborating dynamic and the influence on neighbouring states that are characteristic of successful regional initiatives else- where—such as in Europe and South-East Asia—but have never been attained in purely post-Soviet groups such as the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).4 It has also shown a remarkable speed of evolution, considering that its more informal precursor—the Shanghai Five group of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan—was established only in 1996 and the first SCO summit was held just six years ago. As with the economic growth of some Asian countries, it may be doubted whether this rate of advance can be sustained, but there is no guarantee that it will not be. Second, the SCO both channels and illuminates many of the most interesting issues and themes of Asian security today. It embodies a new and unprecedented model of Chinese–Russian relations following the initial post-World War II Sino- Soviet pact,5 the relapse into hostile competition between two great Communist powers after 1958, and the gradual reconciliation that culminated just before the events of June 1989 in Tiananmen Square.6 It sheds light on China’s and Russia’s visions of their mutual interaction in Central Asia, on how the Central Asian states themselves view and react to this and on how the various SCO members view and treat the evolving US engagement in the region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oecd Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors
    OECD SECRETARY-GENERAL TAX REPORT TO G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS Saudi Arabia July 2020 For more information: [email protected] www.oecd.org/tax @OECDtax | 1 OECD Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Saudi Arabia July 2020 PUBE 2 | This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. Please cite this report as: OECD (2020), OECD Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors – July 2020, OECD, Paris. www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-secretary-general-tax-report-g20-finance-ministers-july-2020.pdf Note by Turkey The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Chapter » (PDF)
    37 CHAPTER 2 ASSESSING REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS’ WORK IN DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT his chapter looks at one group of important but little-studied actors in disaster risk management (DRM): regional organizations.171 Although regional mechanisms are Tplaying increasingly important roles in disasters, there has been remarkably little research on their role in disaster risk management. In fact, there are few published studies about the relative strengths and weaknesses of regional bodies, much less comparisons of their range of activities or effectiveness in DRM.172 A recent study carried out by the Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement sought to address this gap by providing some basic information about the work of more than 30 regional organizations involved in disaster risk management and by drawing some comparisons and generalizations about the work of thirteen of these organizations through the use of 17 indicators of effectiveness.173 This chapter provides a summary of some of that research. SECTION 1 Introduction and Methodology: Why a Focus on Regions? Since the 1950s when European regional integration seemed to offer prospects not only for the region’s post-war recovery, but also for lasting peace and security between former enemies, regional organizations have been growing in number and scope. They have 171 There has been a trend to move away from a rigid dichotomy between activities intended to reduce risk/ prepare for disasters and those associated with emergency relief and reconstruction. Thus the term “disaster risk management” (DRM) is used as the overarching concept in this study. However, as the dichotomy between pre-disaster and post-disaster activities is still prevalent in international institutions, international agreements and frameworks, government institutions and regional institutions, the disaster risk reduction (DRR) is also used as a catch-all term for pre-disaster activities while the term disaster management (DM) refers to all post- disaster activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Powers and Global Contenders
    CHAPTER 2 Major Powers and Global Contenders A great number of historians and political scientists share the view that international relations cannot be well understood without paying attention to those states capable of making a difference. Most diplo- matic histories are largely histories of major powers as represented in modern classics such as A. J. P. Taylor’s The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918, or Paul Kennedy’s The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. In political science, the main theories of international relations are essentially theories of major power behavior. The realist tradition, until recently a single paradigm in the study of international relations (Vasquez 1983), is based on the core assumptions of Morgenthau’s (1948) balance-of-power theory about major power behavior. As one leading neorealist scholar stated, “a general theory of international politics is necessarily based on the great powers” (Waltz 1979, 73). Consequently, major debates on the causes of war are centered on assumptions related to major power behavior. Past and present evidence also lends strong support for continuing interest in the major powers. Historically, the great powers partici- pated in the largest percentage of wars in the last two centuries (Wright 1942, 1:220–23; Bremer 1980, 79; Small and Singer 1982, 180). Besides wars, they also had the highest rate of involvement in international crises (Maoz 1982, 55). It is a compelling record for the modern history of warfare (since the Napoleonic Wars) that major powers have been involved in over half of all militarized disputes, including those that escalated into wars (Gochman and Maoz 1984, 596).
    [Show full text]
  • Encounters Between Chinese and Jewish Civilizations
    Demographics, Social Policy, and Asia (Part II) Demographics, Social Policy, and Asia (Part II) Encounters Between Chinese and Jewish Civilizations By Shalom Salomon Wald Comparing Two Civilizations For the Chinese, they were just one of China’s omparison of Chinese and Jewish civ- numerous religious sects with a leader, a holy ilizations does not seem an obvious book, celebrations, and dietary customs. They choice. At first glance, the differences were not seen as a small branch of a much larg- Cbetween Chinese and Jewish history, numbers, er global religion. The Jews of Kaifeng adapted language, religion, and more are enormous. the biblical story to Chinese understanding and Yet since 1605, when Jesuit missionary Matteo wrote that their laws were handed down by a Ricci in Beijing encountered for the first time long line of wise men. All this was perfectly ac- a Chinese Jew, meetings between Chinese and ceptable to Confucians. Equally acceptable were Jews, as well as thoughts about their similari- the Jewish laws of ritual observance, because ties, have fascinated the Western mind.1 Bel- this was exactly what Confucius had demanded gian–Australian sinologist Pierre Ryckmans when he said that spiritual cultivation required called China “the oldest living civilization on the li (ritual observance). On one issue—the earth.” He explained its long duration by spiri- notion of God—Judaism could accept no com- tual memory, language, and the written word, Composite of two eighteenth-century ink rubbings of the 1489 (left) promise and no accommodation: in Judaism, and 1512 (right) stone inscriptions left by the Kaifeng Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • That the Earliest Groups of Jews Came to China Via the Overland Silk Road
    Jews in China: Legends, History and New Perspectives By PAN Guang Jews in Ancient China: The Case of Kaifeng It was during the Tang Dynasty (around the 7th - 8th Century) that the earliest groups of Jews came to China via the overland Silk Road. Others then may come by sea to the coastal areas before moving inland. A few scholars believe that Jews came to China as early as the Han Dynasty (206 B.C. – 220 A.D.) — some even go so far as to place their arrival earlier, during the Zhou Dynasty (around the 6th Century B.C.) — though there have been no archaeological discoveries that would prove such claims. After entering China, Jews lived in many cities and areas, but it was not until in the Song Dynasty (960-1279) that the Kaifeng Jewish Community formed. In the Northern Song Dynasty, a group of Jews came to the then capital Dongjing (now Kaifeng, as it will be referred to below). They were warmly received by the authorities and allowed to live in Kaifeng as Chinese while keeping their own traditions and religious faith. Thereafter, they enjoyed, without prejudice, the same rights and treatment as the Han peoples in matters of residence, mobility, employment, education, land transactions, religious beliefs and marriage. In such a safe, stable and comfortable environment, Jews soon demonstrated their talents in business and finance, achieving successes in commerce and trade and becoming a rich group in Kaifeng. At the same time, their religious activities increased. In 1163, the Jews in Kaifeng built a synagogue right in the heart of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Investment Policies of Member Countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council
    ASSESSING INVESTMENT POLICIES OF MEMBER COUNTRIES OF THE GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL Stocktaking analysis prepared by the MENA-OECD Investment Programme and presented at the Conference entitled: “Assessing Investment Policies of GCC Countries: Translating economic diversification strategies into sound international investment policies” On 5 April 2011 in Abu Dhabi Organised in co-operation of and hosted by the Ministry of Economy of the United Arab Emirates 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................... 4 I. INTRODUCTION: ECONOMIC AND FDI OVERVIEW AND DIVERSIFICATION POLICIES ................. 7 1. After an eventful decade, the GCC economies are at a crossroads ....................................... 7 2. Diversification remains a key challenge in the GCC ............................................................... 9 3. The GCC needs to address human capital issues ................................................................. 17 II. PRESENTATION OF THE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................................... 21 1. The BCDS methodology ........................................................................................................ 21 2. The BCDS investment policy dimension and the stocktaking study .................................... 22 III. ASSESSMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICIES – FDI LAW AND POLICY OF GCC COUNTRIES ........ 24 1. Restrictions to National Treatment .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States
    Order Code RL32688 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Updated April 4, 2006 Bruce Vaughn (Coordinator) Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Wayne M. Morrison Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Summary Southeast Asia has been considered by some to be a region of relatively low priority in U.S. foreign and security policy. The war against terror has changed that and brought renewed U.S. attention to Southeast Asia, especially to countries afflicted by Islamic radicalism. To some, this renewed focus, driven by the war against terror, has come at the expense of attention to other key regional issues such as China’s rapidly expanding engagement with the region. Some fear that rising Chinese influence in Southeast Asia has come at the expense of U.S. ties with the region, while others view Beijing’s increasing regional influence as largely a natural consequence of China’s economic dynamism. China’s developing relationship with Southeast Asia is undergoing a significant shift. This will likely have implications for United States’ interests in the region. While the United States has been focused on Iraq and Afghanistan, China has been evolving its external engagement with its neighbors, particularly in Southeast Asia. In the 1990s, China was perceived as a threat to its Southeast Asian neighbors in part due to its conflicting territorial claims over the South China Sea and past support of communist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • Asean Charter
    THE ASEAN CHARTER THE ASEAN CHARTER Association of Southeast Asian Nations The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established on 8 August 1967. The Member States of the Association are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. The ASEAN Secretariat is based in Jakarta, Indonesia. =or inquiries, contact: Public Affairs Office The ASEAN Secretariat 70A Jalan Sisingamangaraja Jakarta 12110 Indonesia Phone : (62 21) 724-3372, 726-2991 =ax : (62 21) 739-8234, 724-3504 E-mail: [email protected] General information on ASEAN appears on-line at the ASEAN Website: www.asean.org Catalogue-in-Publication Data The ASEAN Charter Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, January 2008 ii, 54p, 10.5 x 15 cm. 341.3759 1. ASEAN - Organisation 2. ASEAN - Treaties - Charter ISBN 978-979-3496-62-7 =irst published: December 2007 1st Reprint: January 2008 Printed in Indonesia The text of this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted with proper acknowledgment. Copyright ASEAN Secretariat 2008 All rights reserved CHARTER O THE ASSOCIATION O SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PREAMBLE WE, THE PEOPLES of the Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as represented by the Heads of State or Government of Brunei Darussalam, the Kingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia, the Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, Malaysia, the Union of Myanmar, the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Singapore, the Kingdom of Thailand and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: NOTING
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Secretary General 2011
    Annual Report of the Secretary-General 2011 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL 2011 CARIBBEAN COMMUNITY SECRETARIAT Guyana 2018 Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat Turkeyen P.O. Box 10827 Georgetown Guyana Tel: (592) 222 0001-0075 Fax: (592) 222 0170/71 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.caricom.org ISBN 978-976-600-404-0 (pbk) © 2018 Caribbean Community Secretariat Permission is granted for the reprinting of any material in this publication subject to due acknowledgement of the source. CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal iii Introduction v Section I - Trade and Economic Integration 1 ~~CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME) 2 ~~Agriculture 4 ~~Energy 6 ~~Information and Communications Technology for Development (ICT4D) 6 ~~Services 8 ~~Private Sector 9 Section II - Human and Social Development 10 ~~Health 11 ~~Pan Caribbean Partnership Against HIV and AIDS (PANCAP) 12 ~~Youth 14 ~~Education 15 ~~Sustainable Development and the Environment 16 ~~Climate Change 17 ~~Fight Against Illicit Drugs 17 ~~Gender 17 Section III – Security 18 Section IV - Foreign and Community Relations 22 ~~Community Relations 23 ~~Relations with Third States, Groups of States and International/Multilateral 26 Organisations ~~Resource Mobilisation 33 Section V - Statistics 34 Section VI - Agreements Signed/Ratified 36 Section VII - Operations of the CARICOM Secretariat 39 ~~Human Resource Management 40 ~~Conference Services 40 ~~Information Technology Services 40 ~~Documentation Services 40 ~~Exhibitions and Tours 41 ~~Strategic Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation 41 ~~Audit 42 ~~Finance and Budget 42 Section VIII - Appendices 45 ~~I - The Caribbean Community (CARICOM) 46 ~~II - Acronyms 54 INTRODUCTION Ambassador Irwin LaRocque, Secretary-General of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) 2011 ushered in a new chapter in the history of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) with the appointment of the seventh Secretary-General, Ambassador Irwin LaRocque, a national of Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY i CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia October 2015 Thomas Zimmerman NEW YORK UNIVERSITY CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The world faces old and new security challenges that are more complex than our multilateral and national institutions are currently capable of managing. International cooperation is ever more necessary in meeting these challenges. The NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC) works to enhance international responses to conflict, insecurity, and scarcity through applied research and direct engagement with multilateral institutions and the wider policy community. CIC’s programs and research activities span the spectrum of conflict, insecurity, and scarcity issues. This allows us to see critical inter-connections and highlight the coherence often necessary for effective response. We have a particular concentration on the UN and multilateral responses to conflict. Table of Contents The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia Thomas Zimmerman Acknowledgments 2 Foreword 3 Introduction 6 The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor 9 Chinese Engagement with Afghanistan 11 Conclusion 18 About the Author 19 Endnotes 20 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences (SASS) for its support during the research and writing of this paper, particularly Professor Pan Guang and Professor Li Lifan. I would also like to thank Director Li Yihai, and Sun Weidi from the SASS Office for International Cooperation, as well as Vice President Dong Manyuan, and Professor Liu Xuecheng of the China Institute for International Studies. This paper benefited greatly from the invaluable feedback of a number of policy experts, including Klaus Rohland, Andrew Small, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Implications of the Evolving Shanghai Cooperation Organization
    The United States Army War College The United States Army War College educates and develops leaders for service at the strategic level while advancing knowledge in the global application of Landpower. The purpose of the United States Army War College is to produce graduates who are skilled critical thinkers and complex problem solvers. Concurrently, it is our duty to the U.S. Army to also act as a “think factory” for commanders and civilian leaders at the strategic level worldwide and routinely engage in discourse and debate concerning the role of ground forces in achieving national security objectives. The Strategic Studies Institute publishes national security and strategic research and analysis to influence policy debate and bridge the gap between military and academia. The Center for Strategic Leadership and Development CENTER for contributes to the education of world class senior STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP and DEVELOPMENT leaders, develops expert knowledge, and provides U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE solutions to strategic Army issues affecting the national security community. The Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute provides subject matter expertise, technical review, and writing expertise to agencies that develop stability operations concepts and doctrines. U.S. Army War College The Senior Leader Development and Resiliency program supports the United States Army War College’s lines of SLDR effort to educate strategic leaders and provide well-being Senior Leader Development and Resiliency education and support by developing self-awareness through leader feedback and leader resiliency. The School of Strategic Landpower develops strategic leaders by providing a strong foundation of wisdom grounded in mastery of the profession of arms, and by serving as a crucible for educating future leaders in the analysis, evaluation, and refinement of professional expertise in war, strategy, operations, national security, resource management, and responsible command.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Shifts in Power and Geopolitical Regionalization
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Scholvin, Sören Working Paper Emerging Non-OECD Countries: Global Shifts in Power and Geopolitical Regionalization GIGA Working Papers, No. 128 Provided in Cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Suggested Citation: Scholvin, Sören (2010) : Emerging Non-OECD Countries: Global Shifts in Power and Geopolitical Regionalization, GIGA Working Papers, No. 128, German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA), Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Inclusion of a paper in the Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue.
    [Show full text]