DOCSLIB.ORG

Reproductive Success of Greater Sandhill Cranes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reproductive Success of Greater Sandhill Cranes REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF GREATER SANDHILL CRANES (ANTIGONE CANADENSIS TABIDA) AT HORICON MARSH, WISCONSIN By Sabine Y. Berzins A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NATURAL RESOURCES (WILDLIFE) College of Natural Resources UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN Stevens Point, Wisconsin December 2020 APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE COMMITTEE OF: Dr. Shelli A. Dubay Professor of Wildlife Dr. Jason D. Riddle Professor of Wildlife Dr. Benjamin S. Sedinger Assistant Professor of Wildlife Anne E. Lacy Senior Manager – North America Programs, International Crane Foundation Sadie L. O’Dell Wildlife Biologist, Horicon National Wildlife Refuge ii ABSTRACT Greater sandhill cranes (Antigone canadensis tabida) and endangered whooping cranes (Grus americana) share many life history traits. Therefore, evaluating sandhill crane productivity in certain locations could be an indicator of future whooping crane breeding success. Since 2011, captive-reared whooping cranes have been released at Horicon Marsh in Dodge County, Wisconsin, adding to the reintroduced Eastern Migratory Population. However, reproductive success of this population has remained low. Few whooping cranes spend the breeding season at Horicon Marsh, so questions remain as to whether whooping cranes can nest and raise young successfully at Horicon. To reevaluate Horicon Marsh as a release area for whooping cranes, I studied nest density and success as well as colt survival of sandhill cranes at Horicon Marsh. Fifty-seven nests were detected via aerial surveys during 2018–2019. Detection probability was estimated to be 66% using a closed-population mark-recapture method. Nest densities (0.64 nests/km2) were lower than reported in other studies. Using trail cameras, I estimated nest success of 36 sandhill crane nests. Both apparent nest success (0.82) and daily nest survival (0.991) were high compared to other published estimates. Colt survival was estimated by tracking family groups where one adult was radio marked to determine the fate of the colt(s). Colts were estimated to have a 3% chance of surviving to fledge. My results suggest that availability of nesting habitat and nest success were not limiting sandhill crane productivity at Horicon Marsh. However, colt survival may be too low to contribute to the growth of the sandhill crane population, raising questions about the potential for reproductive success for cranes of either species at Horicon Marsh. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was made possible through support from the International Crane Foundation, the University of Wisconsin—Stevens Point, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The project and my writing were improved by the contributions of my committee members, Shelli Dubay, Jason Riddle, Anne Lacy, Sadie O’Dell, and Ben Sedinger. I would like to thank Shelli and Jason, my co-advisors, for taking me on as a graduate student, helping to fund my position, and for their trust and support over the years. Anne initiated this project, and I am so grateful to have had the opportunity. Sadie went above and beyond at Horicon NWR and for me personally—thank you for being a wonderful summer roommate. I am glad to have learned a great deal from Ben’s expertise on wetlands and waterfowl. I would like to thank the Horicon National Wildlife Refuge staff, especially Sadie, Jon Krapfl, Bill Peterson, and Dave Bolin for sharing vehicles, equipment, and their invaluable knowledge of the Refuge. Paul Samerdyke and Chris Cole from Horicon Marsh Wildlife Area were always willing to answer questions and provide logistic support. It was my pleasure to work with Nora Hargett, who was extremely competent and positive at all times. I would also like to thank Renee Wahlen, Marsh Haven Nature Center, and the Friends of Horicon National Wildlife Refuge for providing field housing for Nora. Andy Gossens from ICF did much of my fieldwork with me, and I truly could not have done this project without him. Thanks also to Bob Bergstrom, who was a dedicated volunteer and great communicator. My friend and lab mate Ross McLean also volunteered his time to help me in the field. Sadie, Jon, and Anne deserve extra thanks as they also spent significant time helping with fieldwork. iv I am also grateful to many people outside of Horicon who supported this research. David Moore generously donated the helicopter flights; a huge thank you goes to Todd Chilton and Brian Richter, the expert pilots who flew the surveys. Suzanne Johnson supported my internship at ICF. Davin Lopez and Liz Smith provided trail cameras. I learned so much from Brad Strobel, Jeff Fox, and Ross McLean during my time at Necedah NWR. Thanks also to the ICF folks who first introduced me to crane research, especially Dorn Moore, Hillary Thompson, Anne, Andy, and, of course, Dr. George Archibald. George suggested that I take on this project, and I am so thankful for his kindness and guidance. And, last but not least, thanks to my parents for supporting me always. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... x PREFACE ...................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1: SANDHILL AND WHOOPING CRANES—BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 Justification .................................................................................................................. 1 Historic recovery of sandhill and whooping crane populations .................................. 2 Previous research at Necedah National Wildlife Refuge, Wisconsin ......................... 5 Shifting the release area of EMP whooping cranes to eastern Wisconsin ................... 7 Sandhill cranes as a substitute species for whooping cranes ....................................... 9 Sandhill and whooping cranes at Horicon Marsh ...................................................... 13 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................. 14 CHAPTER 2: SANDHILL CRANE NEST DETECTION AND AVAILABILITY OF NESTING HABITAT ........................................................................................................20 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 20 METHODS.................................................................................................................... 24 Study area .................................................................................................................. 24 Helicopter surveys of nests ........................................................................................ 25 Calculation of detection probability .......................................................................... 27 Calculation of nest density ........................................................................................ 28 Classifying cattail landcover at Horicon NWR ......................................................... 29 RESULTS...................................................................................................................... 32 Probability of nest detection and estimated abundance ............................................. 32 Nest density ............................................................................................................... 33 Supervised classification of Horicon NWR ............................................................... 34 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................... 35 Nest detection and estimates of abundance ............................................................... 35 Nest density ............................................................................................................... 37 Survey coverage ........................................................................................................ 38 Availability of nesting habitat ................................................................................... 39 vi Management implications ......................................................................................... 42 LITERATURE CITED ................................................................................................. 44 CHAPTER 3: SANDHILL CRANE NEST SUCCESS AND COLT SURVIVAL AT HORICON MARSH, WI ...................................................................................................57 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 57 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................. 61 METHODS...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Conservation and Management of Indian Sarus Crane (Grus Antigone Antigone) in and Around Alwara Lake of District Kaushambi (U.P.), India
    ISSN:150 2394-1391 Indian Journal of Biology Volume 5 Number 2, July - December 2018 Original Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijb.2394.1391.5218.7 Sustainable Conservation and Management of Indian Sarus crane (Grus antigone antigone) in and around Alwara Lake of District Kaushambi (U.P.), India Ashok Kumar Verma1, Shri Prakash2 Abstract The Indian Sarus crane, Grus antigone antigone is the only resident breeding crane of Indian subcontinent that has been declared as ‘State Bird’ by the Government of Uttar Pradesh. This is one of the most graceful, monogamous, non-migratory and tallest flying bird of the world that pair for lifelong and famous for marital fidelity. Population of this graceful bird now come in vulnerable situation due to the shrinking of wetlands at an alarming speed in the country. Present survey is aimed to study the population of sarus crane in the year 2017 in and around the Alwara Lake of district Kaushambi (Uttar Pradesh) India and their comparison to sarus crane population recorded from 2012 to 2016 in the same study area. This comparison reflects an increasing population trend of the said bird in the area studied. It has been observed that the prevailing ecological conditions of the lake, crane friendly behaviour of the local residents and awareness efforts of the authors have positive correlation in the sustainable conservation and increasing population trends of this vulnerable bird. Keywords: Alwara Lake; Conservation; Population Census; Sarus Crane; Increasing Trend. Introduction Author’s Affiliation: 1Head, Department of Zoology, Govt. P.G. College, Saidabad, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 221508, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's John Muir
    Wisconsin’s John Muir An Exhibit Celebrating the Centennial of the National Park Service “Oh, that glorious Wisconsin wilderness! “Everything new and pure in the very prime of the spring when Nature’s pulses were beating highest and mysteriously keeping time with our own!” “Wilderness is a necessity... Mountain parks and reservations are useful not only as fountains of timber and irrigating rivers, but as fountains of life.” This exhibit was made possible through generous support from the estate of John Peters and the Follett Charitable Trust Muir in Wisconsin “When we first saw Fountain Lake Meadow, on a sultry evening, sprinkled with millions of lightning- bugs throbbing with light, the effect was so strange and beautiful that it seemed far too marvelous to be real.” John Muir (1838–1914) was one of America’s most important environmental thinkers and activists. He came to Wisconsin as a boy, grew up near Portage, and attended the University of Wisconsin. After decades of wandering in the mountains of California, he led the movement for national parks and helped create the Sierra Club. But for much of his life, Muir’s call to protect wild places fell on deaf ears. Muir studied science in Madison but quit in 1863 without a degree, “...leaving one University for another, the Wisconsin University for the University of the Wilderness.” Muir’s letter to the classmate who taught him botany at UW The Movement for National Parks Yosemite Valley “Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in, where Nature may heal and cheer and give strength to body and soul alike.” In 1872, Congress named Yellowstone the first national park.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Wetland Gems
    100 WISCONSIN WETLAND GEMS ® Southeast Coastal Region NE-10 Peshtigo River Delta o r SC-1 Chiwaukee Prairie NE-11 Point Beach & Dunes e i SC-2 Des Plaines River NE-12 Rushes Lake MINNESOTA k e r a p Floodplain & Marshes NE-13 Shivering Sands & L u SC-3 Germantown Swamp Connected Wetlands S SC-4 Renak-Polak Woods NE-14 West Shore Green Bay SU-6 SU-9 SC-5 Root River Riverine Forest Wetlands SU-8 SU-11 SC-6 Warnimont Bluff Fens NE-15 Wolf River Bottoms SU-1 SU-12 SU-3 SU-7 Southeast Region North Central Region SU-10 SE-1 Beulah Bog NC-1 Atkins Lake & Hiles Swamp SU-5 NW-4 SU-4 SE-2 Cedarburg Bog NC-2 Bear Lake Sedge Meadow NW-2 NW-8 MICHIGAN SE-3 Cherokee Marsh NC-3 Bogus Swamp NW-1 NW-5 SU-2 SE-4 Horicon Marsh NC-4 Flambeau River State Forest NW-7 SE-5 Huiras Lake NC-11 NC-12 NC-5 Grandma Lake NC-9 SE-6 Lulu Lake NC-6 Hunting River Alders NW-10 NC-13 SE-7 Milwaukee River NC-7 Jump-Mondeaux NC-8 Floodplain Forest River Floodplain NW-6 NC-10 SE-8 Nichols Creek NC-8 Kissick Alkaline Bog NW-3 NC-5 NW-9 SE-9 Rush Lake NC-9 Rice Creek NC-4 NC-1 SE-10 Scuppernong River Area NC-10 Savage-Robago Lakes NC-2 NE-7 SE-11 Spruce Lake Bog NC-11 Spider Lake SE-12 Sugar River NC-12 Toy Lake Swamp NC-6 NC-7 Floodplain Forest NC-13 Turtle-Flambeau- NC-3 NE-6 SE-13 Waubesa Wetlands Manitowish Peatlands W-7 NE-9 WISCONSIN’S WETLAND GEMS SE-14 White River Marsh NE-2 Northwest Region NE-8 Central Region NE-10 NE-4 NW-1 Belden Swamp W-5 NE-12 WH-5 Mink River Estuary—Clint Farlinger C-1 Bass Lake Fen & Lunch NW-2 Black Lake Bog NE-13 NE-14 ® Creek Sedge Meadow NW-3 Blomberg Lake C-4 WHAT ARE WETLAND GEMS ? C-2 Bear Bluff Bog NW-4 Blueberry Swamp WH-2WH-7 C-6 NE-15 NE-1 Wetland Gems® are high quality habitats that represent the wetland riches—marshes, swamps, bogs, fens and more— C-3 Black River NW-5 Brule Glacial Spillway W-1 WH-2 that historically made up nearly a quarter of Wisconsin’s landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Horicon Marsh Bird Checklist Status and Seasonal Distribution
    Horicon Marsh Bird Checklist Status and Seasonal Distribution Made possible by the Horicon Marsh Bird Club Seasons SP: Spring – Mar. – May S: Summer – June – Aug. F: Fall – Sept. – Nov. W: Winter – Dec. – Feb. Probable Abundance ( in suitable habitats and proper times ) A Abundant - Hard to miss – should be able to find on every trip C Common - Should see – should find on 75% of field trips U Uncommon - May see – present every year but in lesser numbers R Rare - Lucky to find – infrequent, few or identification problems H Accidental - Not Expected – sporadic reports or historical records * Nesting – Underlined Species indicates Neotropical Migrants Observer(s): ____________________________________________________ Date: ____________ Weather: _____________________________________ This list includes 288 species of birds that have been sighted on Horicon Marsh. Horicon Marsh is predominantly cattail marsh, managed primarily for waterfowl. However, due to the wide variety of habitat and that Horicon Marsh is over 32000 acres in size, it attracts an abundant diversity of bird species throughout the year. It should be noted that some migrants might be present for only two weeks or so. Birdwatching is encouraged. Please obey all signs and check at the State DNR and National Wildlife Refuge Headquarters for current information. Sp S F W Loons __ Common Loon R R H Grebes __ Pied-billed Grebe* CCCR __ Horned Grebe R R __ Red-necked Grebe* R R R __ Eared Grebe R R R Pelicans __ American White Pelican* C C C Cormorants __ Double-crested Cormorant* C C C R Bitterns, Herons __ American Bittern* UUUR __ Least Bittern* U U U __ Great Blue Heron* AAAR __ Great Egret* C C C __ Snowy Egret R R R __ Little Blue Heron R R R __ Cattle Egret R R R __ Green Heron* U U U __ Black-crowned Night-Heron* CCCR American Vultures __ Turkey Vulture* U U R Swans, Geese and Ducks __ Gr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 STATE PARKS GUIDE.Qxd
    VISITOR INFORMATION GUIDE FOR STATE PARKS, FORESTS, RECREATION AREAS & TRAILS Welcome to the Wisconsin State Park System! As Governor, I am proud to welcome you to enjoy one of Wisconsin’s most cherished resources – our state parks. Wisconsin is blessed with a wealth of great natural beauty. It is a legacy we hold dear, and a call for stewardship we take very seriously. WelcomeWelcome In caring for this land, we follow in the footsteps of some of nation’s greatest environmentalists; leaders like Aldo Leopold and Gaylord Nelson – original thinkers with a unique connection to this very special place. For more than a century, the Wisconsin State Park System has preserved our state’s natural treasures. We have balanced public access with resource conservation and created a state park system that today stands as one of the finest in the nation. We’re proud of our state parks and trails, and the many possibilities they offer families who want to camp, hike, swim or simply relax in Wisconsin’s great outdoors. Each year more than 14 million people visit one of our state park properties. With 99 locations statewide, fun and inspiration are always close at hand. I invite you to enjoy our great parks – and join us in caring for the land. Sincerely, Jim Doyle Governor Front cover photo: Devil’s Lake State Park, by RJ & Linda Miller. Inside spread photo: Governor Dodge State Park, by RJ & Linda Miller. 3 Fees, Reservations & General Information Campers on first-come, first-served sites must Interpretive Programs Admission Stickers occupy the site the first night and any Many Wisconsin state parks have nature centers A vehicle admission sticker is required on consecutive nights for which they have with exhibits on the natural and cultural history all motor vehicles stopping in state park registered.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Notices
    21262 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Notices acquisition were not included in the 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA Comment (1): We received one calculation for TDC, the TDC limit would not 22041–3803; (703) 358–2376. comment from the Western Energy have exceeded amongst other items. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alliance, which requested that we Contact: Robert E. Mulderig, Deputy include European starling (Sturnus Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Housing What is the purpose of this notice? vulgaris) and house sparrow (Passer Investments, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban The purpose of this notice is to domesticus) on the list of bird species Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room provide the public an updated list of not protected by the MBTA. 4130, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) ‘‘all nonnative, human-introduced bird Response: The draft list of nonnative, 402–4780. species to which the Migratory Bird human-introduced species was [FR Doc. 2020–08052 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]‘ Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) does restricted to species belonging to biological families of migratory birds BILLING CODE 4210–67–P not apply,’’ as described in the MBTRA of 2004 (Division E, Title I, Sec. 143 of covered under any of the migratory bird the Consolidated Appropriations Act, treaties with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Russia, or Japan. We excluded DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2005; Pub. L. 108–447). The MBTRA states that ‘‘[a]s necessary, the Secretary species not occurring in biological Fish and Wildlife Service may update and publish the list of families included in the treaties from species exempted from protection of the the draft list.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Behaviour and Productivity of Black-Necked Crane (Grus Nigricolis) in Ladakh
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/809095; this version posted October 17, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Breeding behaviour and productivity of Black-necked crane (Grus nigricolis) in Ladakh, 2 Indian Trans-Himalaya 3 Pankaj Chandan1, Tanveer Ahmed2, Afifullah Khan2* 4 1WWF-India, 172-B, Lodhi Estate, New Delhi, India-110003 5 2Department of Wildlife Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India- 202002 6 *Corresponding author: 7 Email: [email protected] (AF) 8 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/809095; this version posted October 17, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 9 Abstract 10 A long-term study was conducted to understand some aspects of breeding biology of 11 Black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis) in Changthang, Ladakh. Data on aspects such as 12 the breeding season, courtship, mating, egg laying and incubation period, nest site 13 fidelity, egg morphometry, breeding productivity and recruitment rate were collected 14 between 2003 and 2012. Black-necked crane started arriving from last week of March 15 to first half of April and showed fidelity at ten nesting sites. Courtship and mating 16 peaked early morning (0700 hours), around noon (1100 hours) and in late evening 17 (0600 hours) while the nest building at evening (1600 hours).
    [Show full text]
  • Sandhill Crane Antigone Canadensis
    sandhill crane Antigone canadensis Kingdom: Animalia Division/Phylum: Chordata Class: Aves Order: Gruiformes Family: Gruidae ILLINOIS STATUS common, native FEATURES The sandhill crane averages about 40 to 48 inches in length (tail tip to bill tip in preserved specimen). This bird has a wingspan of six to seven feet. A red patch can be seen on the top of the bird’s head extending to the back edge of the bill. The feathers are gray in adults and brown in immature cranes. The crane has long legs and a long neck. The feathers over the rump stick out in a “bustle.” BEHAVIORS The sandhill crane is common in northern Illinois. It lives in prairies, fields (especially in corn fields), the edges of swampy areas, lakes and marshes. Spring migration begins in late February. The bird flies on good weather days and often does not land in Illinois. The sandhill crane has its nesting area in northern Illinois. The nest is a large pile of vegetation on the ground in a marshy area. Two, brown eggs with dark markings are deposited by the female. The male and female alternate incubation duties for the 31- to 32-day incubation period. Fall migration begins in mid- September. The sandhill crane winters in the southern United States from Florida to Texas. Cranes fly with the neck and legs extended. When migrating, they fly in flocks that are linear or in a "v" shape. The sandhill crane eats plant and animal materials. Its call is "garooo-a-a-a." HABITATS Aquatic Habitats lakes, ponds and reservoirs; marshes; peatlands; swamps; wet prairies and fens Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats black soil prairie; dolomite prairie; edge; gravel prairie; hill prairie; sand prairie; shrub prairie © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Cranes
    Conservation Status of Cranes IUCN Population ESA Endangered Scientific Name Common name Continent IUCN Red List Category & Criteria* CITES CMS Trend Species Act Anthropoides paradiseus Blue Crane Africa VU A2acde (ver 3.1) stable II II Anthropoides virgo Demoiselle Crane Africa, Asia LC(ver 3.1) increasing II II Grus antigone Sarus Crane Asia, Australia VU A2cde+3cde+4cde (ver 3.1) decreasing II II G. a. antigone Indian Sarus G. a. sharpii Eastern Sarus G. a. gillae Australian Sarus Grus canadensis Sandhill Crane North America, Asia LC II G. c. canadensis Lesser Sandhill G. c. tabida Greater Sandhill G. c. pratensis Florida Sandhill G. c. pulla Mississippi Sandhill Crane E I G. c. nesiotes Cuban Sandhill Crane E I Grus rubicunda Brolga Australia LC (ver 3.1) decreasing II Grus vipio White-naped Crane Asia VU A2bcde+3bcde+4bcde (ver 3.1) decreasing E I I,II Balearica pavonina Black Crowned Crane Africa VU (ver 3.1) A4bcd decreasing II B. p. ceciliae Sudan Crowned Crane B. p. pavonina West African Crowned Crane Balearica regulorum Grey Crowned Crane Africa EN (ver. 3.1) A2acd+4acd decreasing II B. r. gibbericeps East African Crowned Crane B. r. regulorum South African Crowned Crane Bugeranus carunculatus Wattled Crane Africa VU A2acde+3cde+4acde; C1+2a(ii) (ver 3.1) decreasing II II Grus americana Whooping Crane North America EN, D (ver 3.1) increasing E, EX I Grus grus Eurasian Crane Europe/Asia/Africa LC unknown II II Grus japonensis Red-crowned Crane Asia EN, C1 (ver 3.1) decreasing E I I,II Grus monacha Hooded Crane Asia VU B2ab(I,ii,iii,iv,v); C1+2a(ii) decreasing E I I,II Grus nigricollis Black-necked Crane Asia VU C2a(ii) (ver 3.1) decreasing E I I,II Leucogeranus leucogeranus Siberian Crane Asia CR A3bcd+4bcd (ver 3.1) decreasing E I I,II Conservation status of species in the wild based on: The 2015 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, www.redlist.org CRITICALLY ENDANGERED (CR) - A taxon is Critically Endangered when it is facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild in the immediate future.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Gross and Histopathologic Findings In
    SURVEY OF GROSS AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS IN TWO WINTERING SUBPOPULATIONS OF SANDHILL CRANES (ANTIGONE CANADENSIS) Author(s): Martha Hensel, Miranda Bertram, Raquel Rech, Gabriel L. Hamer, and Sarah A. Hamer Source: Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 54(1):156-160. Published By: Wildlife Disease Association https://doi.org/10.7589/2017-02-036 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.7589/2017-02-036 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. DOI: 10.7589/2017-02-036 Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 54(1), 2018, pp. 156–160 Ó Wildlife Disease Association 2018 Survey of Gross and Histopathologic Findings in Two Wintering Subpopulations of Sandhill Cranes
    [Show full text]
  • Brolga Preying on Grebe Eggs
    Australian Field Ornithology 2020, 37, 119–123 http://dx.doi.org/10.20938/afo37119123 First observation of a Brolga Antigone rubicunda preying on eggs and of ‘water-kicking’ behaviour by Australasian Grebes Tachybaptus novaehollandiae as a nest-defence 1 Helen I. Dunne1 and Elinor C. Scambler2* 1‘Mt Benmore’, Marlborough QLD 4705, Australia 2P.O. Box 1383, Atherton QLD 4883, Australia *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. We report a novel observation of Australian waterbird behaviour: a Brolga Antigone rubicunda preying on eggs of the Australasian Grebe Tachybaptus novaeholliandiae, the first record of birds’ eggs in the diet of a crane in Australia. We also report ‘water-kicking’ by the Australasian Grebe, the first record of this anti-predator behaviour in the species. Neither Brolga diet nor display behaviours of the Australasian Grebe have been systematically investigated, and we suggest avenues for further studies of egg predation and parental defence behaviours in waterbird breeding wetlands. Introduction studies on Brolgas foraging, and for our understanding of distraction displays in the Australasian Grebe. Cranes are opportunistic omnivores (Mirande & Harris 2019), and the Brolga Antigone rubicunda is one of Study site several species that consume a significant proportion of animal foods (Gowland 1983; Marchant & Higgins 1993), Observations were made over 2 days in February 2019 especially in the breeding season (Sundar et al. 2019). We at ‘Mt Benmore’, a cattle-grazing property at 150 m asl, found eight published records of cranes (all in the genus 100 km north-west of Rockhampton (23°22′S, 150°30′E: Antigone) preying on birds’ eggs, but to date eggs have not Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Near-Ultraviolet Light Reduced Sandhill Crane Collisions with a Power Line by 98% James F
    AmericanOrnithology.org Volume XX, 2019, pp. 1–10 DOI: 10.1093/condor/duz008 RESEARCH ARTICLE Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/condor/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/condor/duz008/5476728 by University of Nebraska Kearney user on 09 May 2019 Near-ultraviolet light reduced Sandhill Crane collisions with a power line by 98% James F. Dwyer,*, Arun K. Pandey, Laura A. McHale, and Richard E. Harness EDM International, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] Submission Date: 6 September, 2018; Editorial Acceptance Date: 25 February, 2019; Published May 6, 2019 ABSTRACT Midflight collisions with power lines impact 12 of the world’s 15 crane species, including 1 critically endangered spe- cies, 3 endangered species, and 5 vulnerable species. Power lines can be fitted with line markers to increase the visi- bility of wires to reduce collisions, but collisions can persist on marked power lines. For example, hundreds of Sandhill Cranes (Antigone canadensis) die annually in collisions with marked power lines at the Iain Nicolson Audubon Center at Rowe Sanctuary (Rowe), a major migratory stopover location near Gibbon, Nebraska. Mitigation success has been limited because most collisions occur nocturnally when line markers are least visible, even though roughly half the line markers present include glow-in-the-dark stickers. To evaluate an alternative mitigation strategy at Rowe, we used a randomized design to test collision mitigation effects of a pole-mounted near-ultraviolet light (UV-A; 380–395 nm) Avian Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) to illuminate a 258-m power line span crossing the Central Platte River. We observed 48 Sandhill Crane collisions and 217 dangerous flights of Sandhill Crane flocks during 19 nights when the ACAS was off, but just 1 collision and 39 dangerous flights during 19 nights when the ACAS was on.
    [Show full text]