DOCSLIB.ORG

Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report TAB Public Disclosure Authorized MUGLA MUNICIPALITY Seyh Mahallesi Belediye Sokak MUGLA Phone : +90 (252) 214 1846 Fax : +90 (252) 212 0718 Public Disclosure Authorized MUGLA MUNICIPALITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized REPORT DOKAY-ÇED Environmental Engineering Ltd. Co. Public Disclosure Authorized Öveçler Kabil Caddesi 140/A 06460 Çankaya-ANKARA Phone: +90 312 475 7131 - Fax: +90 312 475 7130 www.dokay.info.tr 2013 ANKARA Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report Project’s Owner: MUGLA MUNICIPALITY Address : Seyh Mahallesi Belediye Sokak / MUGLA Phone : +90 (252) 214 1846 Fax : +90 (252) 212 0718 Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Name of the Project : Plant Project Project Value: 10,000,000 € Mugla Province, Merkez District, Hamursuz Project Location: Hill Station of the Project Project is within the scope of Annex-1 List of within the Scope of EIA EIA Regulation published on 16.12.2003 in Regulation (Sector, the Official Gazette No:25318. (Infrastructure, subsector) Wastewater Treatment Plant) Name of the Organization/Working DOKAY-CED Environmental Engineering Ltd. Group Prepared the Co. PIF/EIA Report/Final EIA Report Address, Phone, Fax of the Ata Mah. Kabil Caddesi No:140/A 06460 Organization/Working Çankaya / ANKARA Group Prepared the Tel: +90 (312) 475 7131 PIF/EIA Report/Final EIA Fax: +90 (312) 475 7130 Report i Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report Presentation Date of PIF/EIA Report/Final EIA MARCH 2012 Report (Day, Month, Year) ii Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Contents iii List of Tables v List of Figures vi Abbreviations vii 1. BRIEF NOTE 1 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 3. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 9 3.1. NATIONAL STANDARDS 9 3.2. INTERNATIONAL CRITERIA 10 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 12 4.1. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 12 4.1.1. CURRENT SITUATION 12 4.1.2. WORKFLOW DIAGRAM 12 4.1.3. POPULATION PROJECTIONS 16 4.1.4. AMOUNT OF WASTEWATER TO BE USED FOR THE DESIGN OF THE WWTP 18 4.1.5. TECHNOLOGY 19 4.1.6. PERSONNEL 33 4.1.7. SETTLEMENT OF TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 33 4.1.8. TYPE AND NUMBER OF CONSTRUCTION MACHINES TO BE USED 33 4.2. UTILIZATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES (LAND AND WATER UTILIZATION, TYPE OF ENERGY UTILIZED ETC.) 34 4.2.1. LAND USE 34 4.2.2. WATER UTILIZATION 34 4.2.3. ENERGY UTILIZATION 34 4.3. PROJECT SITE 34 4.4. GEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 37 4.4.1. GENERAL GEOLOGY 37 4.4.2. LOCAL GEOLOGY 43 4.4.3. TECTONICS 45 4.4.4. HYDROGEOLOGY 45 4.4.5. SEISMICITY 46 4.4.6. NATURAL DISASTERS 47 4.5. CLIMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE REGION 47 4.5.1. PRECIPITATION 48 4.5.2. TEMPERATURE 49 iii Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report 4.5.3. WIND 49 4.6. GEOGROPHIC CONDITIONS 50 4.6.1. TOPOGRAPHICAL STRUCTURE 50 4.6.2. WATER RESOURCES 50 4.6.3. SOIL CONDITION 50 4.7. SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS 51 4.7.1. POPULATION 51 4.7.2. POPULATION GROWTH RATE 51 4.7.3. EDUCATION 51 4.7.4. TRANSPORTATION 52 4.7.5. HEALTH SERVICES 52 4.8. ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTCIS 53 4.9. ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 54 5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 60 5.1. LIQUID WASTES 60 5.1.1. DOMESTIC WASTEWATER 60 5.1.2. RAIN WATER 61 5.1.3. FILTRATE WATER 61 5.2. SOLID WASTE 61 5.2.1. DOMESTIC SOLID WASTE 61 5.2.2. CONSTRUCTION WASTE 61 5.2.3. EXCAVATION EARTH 61 5.2.4. SLUDGE 62 5.3. HAZARDOUS WASTE 62 5.3.1. WASTE OIL 62 5.3.2. MEDICAL WASTE 62 5.3.3. WASTE BATTERIES AND ACCUMULATORS 62 5.4. AIR EMISSIONS 63 5.4.1. GASEOUS EMISSIONS 63 5.4.2. DUST EMISSIONS 63 5.5. ODOR 65 5.6. NOISE 65 5.7. ACCIDDENT RISK DUE TO TECHNOLOGY AND MATERIALS USED 69 6. MITIGATION MEASURES 71 6.1. LIQUID WASTES 71 6.1.1. DOMESTIC WASTEWATER 71 6.1.2. RAIN WATER 71 6.1.3. FILTRATE WATER 72 6.2. SOLID WASTE 72 6.2.1. DOMESTIC SOLID WASTE 72 iv Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report 6.2.2. EXCAVATION 72 6.2.3. WASTE SLUDGE 72 6.2.4. WASTE OIL 74 6.2.5. WASTE BATTERIES AND ACCUMULATORS 74 6.3. AIR EMISSIONS 74 6.4. ODOR 76 6.5. NOISE 76 7. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 78 7.1. TECHNOLOGY ALTERNATIVES 78 7.2. OTHER ALTERNATIVES 79 8. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 81 8.1. INTRODUCTION 81 8.2. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES 82 8.3. MITIGATION MEASURES 83 8.3.1. CONSTRUCTION PHASE 83 8.3.2. OPERATIONAL PHASE 83 8.4. MONITORING PLAN 87 8.4.1. CONSTRUCTION PHASE 88 8.4.2. OPERATIONAL PHASE 88 8.5. INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING 93 8.5.1. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE 93 8.5.2. TRAINING 93 8.5.3. CONSULTANCY SERVICES, 94 8.5.4. PUBLIC RELATIONS 94 8.5.5. SPECIAL STUDIES 95 8.6. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 95 8.6.1. CONSTRUCTIONAL PHASE 95 8.6.2. OPERATIONAL PHASE 97 8.7. CONSULTATION WITH NGO’S AND PROJECT-AFFECTED GROUPS 97 8.7.1. CONSTRUCTION PHASE 97 8.7.2. OPERATIONAL PHASE 97 9. REFERENCES 99 v Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX-A SUMMARY OF PROJECT RELATED TURKISH LEGISLATION APPENDIX-B FLOWCHART OF SELECTED WWTP AND ALTERNATIVE PROCESS APPENDIX -C GEOLOGICAL MAP OF THE PROJECT SITE APPENDIX–D LONG TERM METEOROLOGICAL RECORDS OF MUGLA PROVINCE APPENDIX -E FLORA INVENTORY APPENDIX -F FAUNA INVENTORY APPENDIX–G PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETINGS APPENDIX–H TECHNICAL, ECONOMIC AND ENVORONMENTAL STUDIES ON DISCHARGE OF TREATED WASTEWATER OF MUGLA WWTP vi Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Discharge Standards ..........................................................................................11 Table 2. Distribution of Population in the City Center .......................................................16 Table 3. Population Projections .......................................................................................17 Table 4. Population Projection for Adjacent Residential Areas based upon second-degree regression method presented in Table 3 ...................................................................17 Table 5. Total Population of Muğla Province ....................................................................18 Table 6. Per Capita Wastewater Flow Data Used in Design.............................................19 Table 7. Characteristics of Project Units ..........................................................................21 Table 8. Flow Data and Pollutant Parameters Used in Design .........................................23 Table 9. Discharge Criteria ..............................................................................................24 Table 10. Number of Employees of the Operational Phase ..............................................33 Table 11. Machinery to be Used at Construction Phase ...................................................33 Table 12. Coordinates of the Project Site .........................................................................37 Table 13. Information on Foundation Drilling Wells ..........................................................43 Table 14. Mugla Meteorological Station ...........................................................................48 Table 15. Season-based Average Annual Precipitation Data ...........................................49 Table 16. Population Distribution of Muğla and the Central District ..................................51 Table 17. Population Densities of Muğla and the Central District .....................................51 Table 18. Distribution of Education Institutions with respect to Grade ..............................52 Table 19. Health Institutions in the City Center ................................................................53 Table 20. Specie of Mammals ..........................................................................................58 Table 21. Water Consumption Data .................................................................................60 Table 22. Emission Factors to be Used for Dust Calculations ..........................................64 Table 23. Construction Machinery and Equipment and Their Sound Power Levels (Lw) ...66 Table 24. Noise Distribution with respect to Distance.......................................................67 Table 25. Limit Values for Environmental Noise (Table 5 of annex VIII of the RAMEN) ...68 Table 26. Expenses Associated with Pumping of Effluent to the Outside of the Basin .....78 Table 27. Potential Environmental Impacts of the Project and Mitigation Measures. ........85 Table 28. Monitoring Plan ................................................................................................89 Table 29. Discharge Site Water Quality/Quantity Monitoring Plan ....................................92 Table 30. Task Distribution related to the construction phase EMP requirements ............96 vii Mugla Municipality Mugla Municipality Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Environmental Impact Assessment Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 View from Existing Disposal Site-I ....................................................................... 6 Figure 2 View from Existing Disposal Site-II ...................................................................... 6 Figure 3 View from Existing Disposal Site after the Site Arrangements-I........................... 7 Figure 4 View from Existing Disposal Site after
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dogan and Others V Turkey 29Jun04
    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 June 2004 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Dogan and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr G. RESS, President, Mr I. CABRAL BARRETO, Mr L. CAFLISCH, Mr R. TÜRMEN, Mr J. HEDIGAN, Mrs M. TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA, Mrs H.S. GREVE, judges, and Mr V. BERGER, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 12 February and 10 June 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in fifteen applications (nos. 8803/02, 8804/02, 8805/02, 8806/02, 8807/02, 8808/02, 8809/02, 8810/02, 8811/02, 8813/02, 8815/02, 8816/02, 8817/02, 8818/02 and 8819/02) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by fifteen Turkish nationals, Mr Abdullah Dogan, Mr Cemal Dogan, Mr Ali Riza Dogan, Mr Ahmet Dogan, Mr Ali Murat Dogan, Mr Hasan Yildiz, Mr Hidir Balik, Mr Ihsan Balik, Mr Kazim Balik, Mr Mehmet Dogan, Mr Müslüm Yildiz, Mr Hüseyin Dogan, Mr Yusuf Dogan, Mr Hüseyin Dogan and Mr Ali Riza Dogan (“the applicants”), on 3 December 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 10 September 2020
    DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 10 September 2020 MAP This map is presented for information only. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade accepts no responsibility for errors or omission of any geographic feature. Nomenclature and territorial boundaries may not necessarily reflect Australian government policy. Provided by the Commonwealth of Australia under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. DFAT Country Information Report Turkey SEPTEMBER 2020 2 CONTENTS ACRONYMS 4 GLOSSARY 6 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 7 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8 Recent History 8 Demography 9 Economic Overview 9 Political System 14 Human Rights Framework 16 Security Situation 18 3. REFUGEE CONVENTION CLAIMS 20 Race/Nationality 20 Religion 22 Political Opinion (Actual or imputed) 27 Groups of Interest 31 4. COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION CLAIMS 40 Arbitrary Deprivation of Life 40 Death Penalty 41 Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 41 5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 45 State Protection 45 Internal Relocation 49 Treatment of Returnees 49 Documentation 50 DFAT Country Information Report Turkey SEPTEMBER 2020 3 ACRONYMS AKP Justice and Development Party (the ruling conservative political party) AKS Address Registration System BTK Information and Communication Technologies Authority CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women CHP Republican People’s Party (centre-left opposition political party) CMHC Community
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Politics and Contested Identity Among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: the Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival
    Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2019 2019, Vol. 6, No. 1, 63-76 ISSN: 2149-1291 Culture, Politics and Contested Identity among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: The Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival Ülker Sözen1 Netherlands Institute in Turkey This article analyzes the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival organized by the people of Dersim, an eastern province of Turkey, as a site of political activism, cultural reproduction, and intra-group contestation. The festival began as a group- remaking event for restoring cultural identity, defending locality, and mobilizing Dersimli people in the face of political repression. In time, socio-spatial and political fragmentation within Dersimli society became more prevalent. The festival experience came to reflect and contribute to the debates and anxieties about identity whereby different political groups competed to increase their influence over local politics as well as the event itself. On the one hand, this article discusses the organization of the Munzur Festival, its historical trajectory, and the accompanying public debates and criticisms. On the other, it explores festive sociabilities, cultural performances, and the circulation of politically-charged symbols throughout the event which showcases the articulation and competition of multiple ethno-political belongings which are the Dersimli, Kurdish, Alevi, and socialist ones. The festival’s historical trajectory is dealt as two stages, unified struggle and internal strife, whereby the festival appeared as first a group-remaking then unmaking public event. The paper argues that this transformation is tied to hanging power relations in the local politics of Dersim, and the shifting state policies, namely the phase of repressive control strategies until the mid-2000s and the peace process and political relaxation until 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Evacuations and Destruction of Villages in Dersim (Tunceli), and Western Bingöl, Turkish Kurdistan September-November 1994
    FORCED EVACUATIONS AND DESTRUCTION OF VILLAGES IN DERSIM (TUNCELI), AND WESTERN BINGÖL, TURKISH KURDISTAN SEPTEMBER-NOVEMBER 1994 INTRODUCTION This report details the wave of village evacuations and demolitions, as well as the forest fires that swept across the Dersim region in Turkey, i.e., the province of Tunceli and neighbouring districts, during the autumn of 1994.1 Over a period of two months, around a third of the villages in that province (but in some subdistricts as many as 80 to 100 percent) were evacuated under severe military pressure, and many of them were destroyed and burned down by the army. Thousands of families lost their houses. Moreover large stretches of forest, that only recently had been designated as a nature reserve, were deliberately burnt down. The rationale for all this destruction was the presence of guerrillas of the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), believed to be hiding out in the forests of this province. The inhabitants of the destroyed villages were suspected of giving food and shelter to these guerrillas. Tunceli was not the first province to fall victim to large-scale village evacuations orchestrated by Turkish security forces. The first instances of forced village evacuations in recent years took place in the 1980s, and since 1992 evacuations followed by demolition have been standard practice in sensitive zones of Turkey's Kurdish-inhabited provinces. The Human Rights Associations of Turkey have repeatedly published lists of villages that had been evacuated and destroyed, adding up to well over 2000 names of villages and hamlets. The present report concentrates on the events in Tunceli.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Presidential System After Two and a Half Years. an Overview Of
    SWP Research Paper Sinem Adar and Günter Seufert Turkey’s Presidential System after Two and a Half Years An Overview of Institutions and Politics Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs SWP Research Paper 2 April 2021, Berlin Abstract ∎ Turkey’s new Presidential System has failed to realise the goals that it was said to achieve with its introduction despite the disapproval of half the population. ∎ Contrary to the ruling party’s claims in favour of the new governance system, two and a half years after its introduction, parliament is weaker, separation of powers is undermined, the judiciary is politicised, institu- tions are crippled, economic woes are mounting and authoritarian prac- tices prevail. ∎ Despite the almost unlimited and unchecked power that the new system grants to the President over institutions, his space for political manoeuvre is, surprisingly, narrower than it was in the parliamentary system. ∎ Providing the otherwise divided opposition a joint anchor of resistance, the Presidential System unintentionally breathed life into the inertia of Turkey’s political party setting. ∎ The formation of splinter parties from the ruling party, primarily address- ing the same conservative electorate, alongside the changing electoral logic with the need to form alliances to win an election, poses a serious challenge to the ruling party and its leader – the President. ∎ Despite the oppositional alliance’s electoral victory in 2019 local elec- tions, it is at the moment unclear whether the forming parties share a common vision for steps towards democratic repair. ∎ Together with the institutional havoc caused by the Presidential System, the blurry outlook of the opposition requires caution about an easy and rapid positive transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Regeneration by Somatic Embryogenesis from Immature Seeds of Sternbergia Candida MATHEW ET T
    Propagation of Ornamental Plants Vol. 6, № 3, 2006: 128-133 PLANT REGENERATION BY SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS FROM IMMATURE SEEDS OF STERNBERGIA CANDIDA MATHEW ET T. BAYTOP, AN ENDANGERED ENDEMIC PLANT OF TURKEY Iskender Parmaksiz1 and Khalid Mahmood Khawar 2* Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Gazi Osman Pasa University, Tasliciftilik, Tokat,Turkey, 2*Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ankara, Diskapi, 06110 Ankara, Turkey, *Fax: +90-312-3179815, *E-mail: [email protected] REFERENCES Arslan N., Gurbuz B., Gumuscu A., Özcan S., Mirici S., Khawar K. M. (2002). Cultivation of Sternbergia fischeriana (Herbert) Rupr. and a study on its morphological characteristics. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 34: 411-418. Arslan N. (1999). Importance of pre-stores for the conservation of native flower bulbs. Proceedings of XII-th International Symposium on Plant Originated Crude Drugs, 20-22 May 1998, Ankara, Turkey: 275-288. Arzate-Fernandez A. M., Nakazaki T., Okumoto Y., Tanasika T. (1997). Efficient callus induction and plant regeneration from filaments with anther in lily Lilium( longiforum Thunb.). Plant Cell Reports, 16: 836-840. Baxendale I. R., Ley S. V., Nessi M., Piutti C. (2002). Total synthesis of the Amaryllidiaceae alkaloid (+)-plicamine using solid supported reagenets. Tetrahedron, 58: 6285-6304. Blomstedt C., Cameron J., Whiteman P., Chandler S. F. (1991). Micropropagation of juvenile Eucalyptus regnans (Mountain ash). Australian Journal of Botany, 39: 179-186. Collins M. T., Dixon K. W. (1992). Micropropagation of an Australian orchid Diuris longzfia R. Br. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 32: 131-135. Conchou O., Nichteriein K., Vomel A.
    [Show full text]
  • URGENT ACTION SYRIAN REFUGEES at RISK of BEING RETURNED Around 100 Refugees from Syria Are at Risk of Being Returned to the War-Torn City of Kobani/Ayn Al-Arab
    UA: 260/14 Index: EUR 44/018/2014 Turkey Date: 17 October 2014 URGENT ACTION SYRIAN REFUGEES AT RISK OF BEING RETURNED Around 100 refugees from Syria are at risk of being returned to the war-torn city of Kobani/Ayn Al-Arab. They are part of a group of over 250 men, women and children from Kobani who have been unlawfully detained by the Turkish authorities in a sports hall since 5 October in the border town of Suruç in Turkey’s south-eastern Şanlıurfa province. Of this group, two sets of returns have taken place on October 14 and 16. According to information received from lawyers who visited the refugees and from one of the detainees, a total of over 250 Syrians (including up to 30 children), were detained on and around 5 to 6 October after being denied permission for 24 hours to enter Turkey at the Mürşitpınar border gate. They were fleeing the city of Kobani/Ayn Al-Arab where armed clashes are currently taking place between the armed group that calls itself the Islamic State (IS) and the People’s Defence Units (YPG), the armed group of the Syrian Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), which has controlled Kobani since July 2012. The group of at least 250 refugees has been held in a sports hall, with only blankets to sleep on and no washing facilities. The Governor of Şanlıurfa province reportedly told lawyers on 10 October that the refugees were being held in “administrative supervision ahead of deportation” under Article 57 of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Istanbul Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek
    İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ İSTANBULDAKİ BOTANİK BAHÇELERİNDE YETİŞEN TÜRKİYE GEOFİTLERİNİN ENVANTERİ H. Başak GÜNER Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı Botanik Programı Danışman Prof.Dr. Tuna EKİM Ekim, 2006 İSTANBUL İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ İSTANBULDAKİ BOTANİK BAHÇELERİNDE YETİŞEN TÜRKİYE GEOFİTLERİNİN ENVANTERİ H. Başak GÜNER Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı Botanik Programı Danışman Prof.Dr. Tuna EKİM Ekim, 2006 İSTANBUL Bu çalışma 15/12/2006 tarihinde aşağıdaki jüri tarafından Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı Botanik programında Yüksek Lisans Tezi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Tez Jürisi Prof. Dr. Tuna EKİM Prof. Dr. Semahat YENTÜR İstanbul Üniversitesi İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Fakültesi Prof. Dr. Orhan KÜÇÜKER Prof. Dr. Neriman ÖZHATAY İstanbul Üniversitesi İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Eczacılık Fakültesi Yrd. Doç. Dr. Erdal ÜZEN İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi i ÖNSÖZ Yüksek lisans öğrenimim ve tez çalışmalarım boyunca gösterdiği destek ve yardımlarından dolayı çok değerli hocam PROF. DR. TUNA EKİM'e en içten dileklerimle teşekkür ederim. Öğrenim hayatım boyunca ve tez çalışmamda benden destek ve ilgisini esirgemeyen çok sevgili babam ve değerli hocam PROF. DR. ADİL GÜNER’e en derin dileklerimle teşekkür ederim. İstanbul Üniversitesi Alfred Heilbronn Botanik Bahçesi’nde çalışmalarıma izin verdiği için Botanik Anabilim Dalı’na, Çalışmalarım sırasında imkanlarını esirgemeyen Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi kurucusu sayın ALİ NİHAT GÖKYİĞİT’e, Atatürk Arboretumu şefi
    [Show full text]
  • July 2021 ---International Rock Gardener--- July 2021
    International Rock Gardener ISSN 2053-7557 Number 139 The Scottish Rock Garden Club July 2021 ---International Rock Gardener--- July 2021 This month IRG presents two articles on peonies – the first on Czech bred herbaceous peonies from Pavel Sekerka and the second on tree peonies by Joe Harvey in Canada. Next there are two articles on a fabled European gesneriad, Jankaea heldreichii, written by a Czech, Vlastimil Pilous and Harry Jans, of the Netherlands. IRG 139 finishes with a short review on Sternbergia, again by Vlastimil Pilous. Cover image: Jankaea heldreichii, photo by Vlastimil Pilous. This month’s authors: RNDr. Pavel Sekerka, is the Director, Průhonice Botanic Garden where the aim is to gather gene – pool collections; preserve them and present original botanical species as well as their variability to the public, and to show the progress of breeding since Middle Age to the latest trends in breeding. The collections are thoroughly systematic and chronologically organized. Dr. Sekerka is president of the Union of Botanical Gardens of the Czech Republic and committed to their protection and to ex-situ plant conservation. M. J. (Joe) Harvey, is an Emeritus Professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia where his wife Linda was the University Librarian. Born and educated in England, Joe retired to Victoria, British Columbia where this botanist/geneticist is still active in plant breeding and in promoting many plant species including hellebores, Galanthus, hardy orchids, peonies and more! After studying at the Faculty of Science of Charles University (geography - biology), Dr. Vlastimil Pilous worked for 27 years for the Krkonoše Mountains National Park Administration ( KNRAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Bulbous Monocots in Turkey with Special Reference
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 547–555, 2002. © 2002 IUPAC Diversity of bulbous monocots in Turkey with special reference. Chromosome numbers* Neriman Özhatay‡ University of Istanbul, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, 34452 Ístanbul, Turkey Abstract: Turkey is among the richest countries in the world in terms of plant diversity. The aim of this paper is to show diversity of the petaloid and bulbous plants, which belong to monocotyledones. According to Flora of Turkey and its supplements, the number of species of bulbous monocotyledones is around 688, of which 244 are endemic (endemism 35.4 %). According to the statistical data of Turkish flowering plants based on the published records, only 15 % of the flora have information about chromosome counts, although bulbous mono- cots percentage is higher at 58 %. Fritillaria and Tulipa are stable genera as regards chro- mosome numbers with 2n = 24 and karyotype; on the other hand, the most variable genera are Crocus (2n = 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 26, 28, 30, 70) and Ornithogalum (2n = 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 27, 28, 32, 40, 45, 54, 60, 80). INTRODUCTION Turkey covers 779.452 km2, of which 3 % lies in European Turkey (Thrace), the remainder in Asian Turkey (Anatolia). With around 9000 species, the flora is the richest of any country in Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, and indeed is more typical of a continent or tropical country than an indi- vidual temperate country. Of these, nearly one in every three plants is endemic, an astonishingly high percentage for a mainland country (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Government Capacity to Assure High Quality Regulation
    OECD REVIEWS OF REGULATORY REFORM REGULATORY REFORM IN TURKEY GOVERNMENT CAPACITY TO ASSURE HIGH QUALITY REGULATION ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). Publié en français sous le titre : LA CAPACITÉ DU GOUVERNEMENT A PRODUIRE DES RÉGLEMENTATIONS DE GRANDE QUALITÉ © OECD 2002 Permission to reproduce a portion of this work for non-commercial purposes or classroom use should be obtained through the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC), 20, rue des Grands-Augustins, 75006 Paris, France, tel.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Rock Garden Society |
    Bulletin of the American Rock Garden Society VOL. 42 SPRING 1984 NO. 2 THE BULLETIN Editor . Laura Louise Foster, Falls Village, Conn. 06031 Assistant Editor... Harry Dewey, 4605 Brandon Lane, Beltsville, Md. 20705 Contributing Editors . Roy Davidson, Anita Kistler, H. Lincoln Foster, Owen Pearce, H.N. Porter Layout Designer . Buffy Parker Advertising Manager... Anita Kistler, 1421 Ship Rd., West Chester, Pa. 19380 CONTENTS VOL. 42 NO. 2 SPRING 1984 Dodecatheon - L.L.S. et.al 53 The Great Fatra - Josef Halda 63 Robert Putnam 72 Little Known Miniature Conifers: Part III - Robert Fincham 73 Native Ferns in the Wild and in Our Gardens - David B. Lellinger ... 76 T. Paul Maslin 87 Computors and Rock Gardening - Geoffrey Charlesworth 88 Carroll Watson: The Man and the Plant - L.P.C 90 Galanthus Elwesii or Nivalis - Barbara van Achterberg 91 Book Reviews: Kew, Gardens for Science and Pleasure edited by F. Nigel Hepper; A Giant Among the Dwarfs, The Mystery of Sargant's Weeping Hemlock by Peter Del Tredici 93 In Praise of Arabis Androsacea - Alan Slack 94 A Way to Cope with Fussy Plants - Edith Dusek 95 Viburnum Plicatum Tomentosum 'Fujisanensis' - Vaughn Aiello .... 97 Of Cabbages and Kings 98 Cover Picture - Dodecatheon amethystinum - Laura Louise Foster, Falls Village, Connecticut Published quarterly by the AMERICAN ROCK GARDEN SOCIETY, a tax-exempt, non-profit organization incor• porated under the laws of the state of New Jersey. You are invited to join. Annual dues (Bulletin included), to be submitted in U.S. Funds or International Money Order, are: General Membership, $15.00 (includes domestic or foreign, single or joint — 2 at same address to receive 1 Bulletin, 1 Seed List); Patron, $50.00; Life Member, $250.00.
    [Show full text]