AVAILABLE Frommidwest Philosophy of Education Society, Ames, IA 50010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AVAILABLE Frommidwest Philosophy of Education Society, Ames, IA 50010 DOCUMENT RESUME ED 364 493 SO 023 674 AUTHOR Owen, David B., Ed.; Swartz, Ronald M., Ed. TITLE Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Midwest Philosophy of Education Society (Chicago, Illinois, November 8-9, 1991, and November 13-14, 1992). INSTITUTION Midwest Philosophy of Education Society. PUB DATE 93 NOTE 371p.; For earlier proceedings, see ED 356 992-993, ED 345 983-987, ED 319 670, and ED 241 407. AVAILABLE FROMMidwest Philosophy of Education Society, Ames, IA 50010. PUB TYPE Collected Works - Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC15 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Critical Thinking; Democracy; *Educational Environment; Educational Objectives; *Educational Philosophy; *Educational Theories; *Ethical Instruction; Females; Grading; Higher Education; Popular Culture; *Social Change; Student Evaluation; Teaching (Occupation) IDENTIFIERS Beauvoir (Simone de); Confucius; *Dewey (John); Peirce (Charles S); *Postmodernism ABSTRACT This document consists of papers that were presented at the 1991 and 1992 annual meetings of the Midwest Philosophy of Education Society. The book is divided into four sections. The first is composed of the society president's address at the 1992 meeting and a response to that address. The presidential address discussed chaos theory and the philosophy of Charles Peirce as it related to the future of philosophy of education. The second section contains the papers presented at the 1991 meeting. Lome subjects included are: (1) critical thinking and Aristotle's "Posterior Analytics"; (2) philosophy of popular culture in academia; (3) student disbelief; (4) conflict between individual rights and social values in the civil rights movement; (5) changes in U.S. education as it relates to the teaching profession; (6) and (7) John Dewey's educational philosophy; and (8) democracy and education beyond the classroom. The third section consists of the papers presented at the 1992 annual meeting. Subjects in this section include Simone de Beauvoir's theory of women in society and social change, education and democracy, hopefulness and inner city students, education and love, irreducibility of value, Confucius, the ethics of evaluation and grading, teaching, education initiative and social reconstructivism, educating the emotions, philosophy of life rhythms, critical thinking strategies, poetry, moral education, radical perspectivism, and Catholic education. The final section is appendices of meeting programs, members and officers, and business meeting reports. (DK) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** UAL DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION Office of Educational Researchand improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER IERICI )44his document haS been reproducedali eceived from the person or organization originating it 0 Minor changes have been mad*to improve reproduction Quality Points ol view or opinions statedin this docu- ment do not necessarily represent official OEM positron or policy PROCEEDINGS OF THE MIDWEST PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION SOCIETY, 1991 and 1992 "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEFN GRANTED BY ffi RA LIv_ TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." BEST COPY AVAILABLE 2 40) PROCEEDINGS OF THE MIDWEST PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION SOCIETY, 1991 and 1992 David B. Owen, Editor Ronald M. Swartz, AssociateEditor 0 1993 by the Midwest Philosophy of Education Society, Ames, Iowa 50010. All Rights arc reserved. No part of these Proceedings may he reproduced without the permission of the Society. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS David B. Owen Pre( ace vii I. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS George W. Stickel Philosophy of Education for the Year 2000 A.D.: Chaos Theory and the Philosophy of Charles Peirce (Delivered November 13, 1992) 3 Lawrence J. Dennis Response. Postmodernism, Seattle, and Stickel 35 II. 1991 ANNUAL MEETING Charles E. Alberti Critical Thinking and Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 41 Don G. Smith Toward a Philosophy of Popular Culture in Academia 49 Walter P. Krolikowski "Believe Me Not; And Yet I like Not": A Case For Student Disbelief 53 Joseph Watras Was There a Conflict Between Individual Rights and Social Values in the Civil Rights Movement? 67 Robert A. Leone (Graduate Student Award Winner) American Education in Fluxion and the Possibility of a Teaching Profession 77 Alexander Makedon Reinterpreting Dewey: Some Thoughts on His Views of Science and Play in Education 93 III 5 iv Robert P. Craig The Relationship Between Interest and Discipline: John Dewey Revisited 103 Louis Silverstein Taking It to the Streets: Democracy and Education Beyond the Classroom 111 HI. 1992 ANNUAL MEETING Allison E. Williams Does Evolution Necessitate Revolution? A Look at the Implications of Sirnone de Beauvoir's Claim, "One is Not Born a Woman, One Becomes One" 119 Michael A. Oliker Analytical Philosophy and the Discourse of Institutional Democracy 127 Michael T. Risku Hopefulness:The Value Variable for Inner City Students 135 Ian M. Harris On the Relationship Betwcen Education and Love 143 Thomas S. Deeds Mark Johnston and David Lewis on the Irreducibility of Value 167 Kyung Hi Kim Confucius and His Impact on Education 177 Richard C. Pipan Reflections on a Round Table Discussion -- "Thoughts on Evaluation: Moral and Ethical Dilemmas of Grading" 191 Arthur Brown Undergraduate Assessment As Pedagogical and Political Control 205 Susan V. Aud (Graduate Student Award Winner) Teaching in a Postmodern World 217 Robert P. Craig On Educating the Emotions 231 Janis B. Fine Philosophy of Education and Relevance for the '90s: Regular Education Initiative and Social Reconstructionism 241 Louis Silverstein Sketches of a Philosophy of Life Rhythms & Education ....249 Charles E. Alberti Whose Critical Thinking Strategy Is of Most Worth? 253 Lawrence Santoro From Puggy to Larry: Poetry from Gathering Light 261 David B. Annis Moral Education and Integrity: Educating for Higher-Level Character Traits 287 Alexander Makcdon Humans in the World: Introduction to the Educational Theory of Radical Perspectivism 297 Walter P. Krolikowski Philosophy of Catholic Education Before Vatican II 311 Robert N. Barger McGucken Revisited: A Fifty-Year Retrospective on American Catholic Educational Philosophy 319 Don G. Smith American First and Catholics Second: The Decline of Catholic Education Since Vatican II 327 7 vi IV. APPENDICES Appendix A Program of the 1991 Annual Meeting 337 Appendix B Program ol the 1992 Annual Meeting 343 Appendix C Officers and Committees, 1991-1992 349 Appendix D Minutes of the Business Meeting, Including Treasurer's Report, November 13, 1992 351 Appendix E Membership List, 1991-1992 355 Appendix F Cumulative Index to Proceedings, 1977-1992 367 PREFACE These Proceedings are composed of papers which presenters at the 1991 and 1992 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Philosophy of Education Society wished to have published. Each paper herein went through a peer- review process by the Society's Program Committee before being accepted for presentation at its respective Meeting. The Editors would like to thank the authors represented herein for cooperating with a new approach to publishing their work.Although submitting their papers electronically for publication in this Proceedings was undoubtedly awkward for some, it makes for increased accuracy and improved quality of presentation of their contributions. Hopefully the Society will find that the new style of this Proceedings shows more striking' thc quality of work the Society's members arc doing. The Annual Meetings on November 8 and 9, 1991, and November 13 and 14, 1992, were held at Loyola University of Chicago. As usual, the Society is greatly indebted to Walter P. Krolikowski for arranging such a well planned and enjoyable setting.In addition, the Society also wants to thank the School of Education, Dean Robert E. Roemer, and the University for generously hosting our two-day gatherings. The Society would also like to express its appreciation to the Program Committees from 1991 and 1992 for refereeing the papers submitted for presentation and for organizing the programs. Last, but certainly not least, I would like to thank Ronald Swartz for his help in getting these Proceedings together and for his continued advice about various problems as they arose. It is support like his which makes one realize that MPES is a unique professional organization, one composed of genuine colleagues. David B. Owen Ames, Iowa vii 41. 9 I. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS ".- Presidential Address Midwest Philosophy of Education 1992 Annual Meeting PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION FOR THE YEAR 2000 A.D.: CHAOS THEORY AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF CHARLES PEIRCE George W. Stickel Kennesaw State College I. Introduction The job of philosophy, I believe, is to providea consistent, compre- hensive, coherent, and congruent understanding of reality,knowing, and valuing.The role of the philosopher of education is to theorize and apply that understanding to the world of learning and teaching. Suchwork defines the educational researcher's task and improves the efficiencyof data collection. With each generation, the reality aboutus or at least our understand- ing of it changes, and our comprehension of howwe know changes with that reality.While values may or may not change, the philosophy ofvaluing continually gains new insights into the process. For example, philosophies following Newton defined a mechanistic, ordered universe;those
Recommended publications
  • A Simple Logic for Comparisons and Vagueness
    THEODORE J. EVERETT A SIMPLE LOGIC FOR COMPARISONS AND VAGUENESS ABSTRACT. I provide an intuitive, semantic account of a new logic for comparisons (CL), in which atomic statements are assigned both a classical truth-value and a “how much” value or extension in the range [0, 1]. The truth-value of each comparison is determined by the extensions of its component sentences; the truth-value of each atomic depends on whether its extension matches a separate standard for its predicate; everything else is computed classically. CL is less radical than Casari’s comparative logics, in that it does not allow for the formation of comparative statements out of truth-functional molecules. I argue that CL provides a better analysis of comparisons and predicate vagueness than classical logic, fuzzy logic or supervaluation theory. CL provides a model for descriptions of the world in terms of comparisons only. The sorites paradox can be solved by the elimination of atomic sentences. In his recent book on vagueness, Timothy Williamson (1994) attacks accounts of vagueness arising from either fuzzy logic or supervaluation theory, both of which have well-known problems, stemming in part from their denial of classical bivalence. He then gives his own, epistemic ac- count of vagueness, according to which the vagueness of a predicate is fundamentally a matter of our not knowing whether or not it applies in every case. My main purpose in this paper is not to criticize William- son’s positive view, but to provide an alternative, non-epistemic account of predicate vagueness, based on a very simple logic for comparisons (CL), which preserves bivalence.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Informal Logic Have Anything to Learn from Fuzzy Logic?
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 3 May 15th, 9:00 AM - May 17th, 5:00 PM Does informal logic have anything to learn from fuzzy logic? John Woods University of British Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive Part of the Philosophy Commons Woods, John, "Does informal logic have anything to learn from fuzzy logic?" (1999). OSSA Conference Archive. 62. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA3/papersandcommentaries/62 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences and Conference Proceedings at Scholarship at UWindsor. It has been accepted for inclusion in OSSA Conference Archive by an authorized conference organizer of Scholarship at UWindsor. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Title: Does informal logic have anything to learn from fuzzy logic? Author: John Woods Response to this paper by: Rolf George (c)2000 John Woods 1. Motivation Since antiquity, philosophers have been challenged by the apparent vagueness of everyday thought and experience. How, these philosophers have wanted to know, are the things we say and think compatible with logical laws such as Excluded Middle?1 A kindred attraction has been the question of how truth presents itself — relatively and in degrees? in approximations? in resemblances, or in bits and pieces? F.H. Bradley is a celebrated (or as the case may be, excoriated) champion of the degrees view of truth. There are, one may say, two main views of error, the absolute and relative. According to the former view there are perfect truths, and on the other side there are sheer errors..
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialectic of Freedom 1St Edition Pdf Free Download
    THE DIALECTIC OF FREEDOM 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Maxine Greene | 9780807728970 | | | | | The Dialectic of Freedom 1st edition PDF Book She examines the ways in which the disenfranchised have historically understood and acted on their freedom—or lack of it—in dealing with perceived and real obstacles to expression and empowerment. It offers readers a critical opportunity to reflect on our continuing ideological struggles by examining popular books that have made a difference in educational discourse. Professors: Request an Exam Copy. Major works. Max Horkheimer Theodor W. The latter democratically makes everyone equally into listeners, in order to expose them in authoritarian fashion to the same programs put out by different stations. American Paradox American Quest. Instead the conscious decision of the managing directors executes as results which are more obligatory than the blindest price-mechanisms the old law of value and hence the destiny of capitalism. Forgot your password? There have been two English translations: the first by John Cumming New York: Herder and Herder , ; and a more recent translation, based on the definitive text from Horkheimer's collected works, by Edmund Jephcott Stanford: Stanford University Press, Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. Peter Lang. The truth that they are nothing but business is used as an ideology to legitimize the trash they intentionally produce. Archetypal literary criticism New historicism Technocriticism. The author concludes with suggestions for approaches to teaching and learning that can provoke both educators and students to take initiatives, to transcend limits, and to pursue freedom—not in solitude, but in reciprocity with others, not in privacy, but in a public space.
    [Show full text]
  • Intransitivity and Vagueness
    Intransitivity and Vagueness Joseph Y. Halpern∗ Cornell University Computer Science Department Ithaca, NY 14853 [email protected] http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/halpern Abstract preferences. Moreover, it is this intuition that forms the ba- sis of the partitional model for knowledge used in game the- There are many examples in the literature that suggest that indistinguishability is intransitive, despite the fact that the in- ory (see, e.g., [Aumann 1976]) and in the distributed sys- distinguishability relation is typically taken to be an equiv- tems community [Fagin, Halpern, Moses, and Vardi 1995]. alence relation (and thus transitive). It is shown that if the On the other hand, besides the obvious experimental obser- uncertainty perception and the question of when an agent vations, there have been arguments going back to at least reports that two things are indistinguishable are both care- Poincare´ [1902] that the physical world is not transitive in fully modeled, the problems disappear, and indistinguishabil- this sense. In this paper, I try to reconcile our intuitions ity can indeed be taken to be an equivalence relation. More- about indistinguishability with the experimental observa- over, this model also suggests a logic of vagueness that seems tions, in a way that seems (at least to me) both intuitively to solve many of the problems related to vagueness discussed appealing and psychologically plausible. I then go on to ap- in the philosophical literature. In particular, it is shown here ply the ideas developed to the problem of vagueness. how the logic can handle the Sorites Paradox. To understand the vagueness problem, consider the well- n+1 1 Introduction known Sorites Paradox: If grains of sand make a heap, then so do n.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Concept of Injustice. Trichotomy Critique, Explanation, and Normativity
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2014v13n1p50 A CRITICAL CONCEPT OF INJUSTICE. TRICHOTOMY CRITIQUE, EXPLANATION, AND NORMATIVITY UM CONCEITO CRÍTICO DE INJUSTIÇA. A TRICOTOMIA CRÍTICA, ESCLARECIMENTO E NORMATIVIDADE MAREK HRUBEC1 (Charles University, Czech Republic) ABSTRACT The article deals with an issue of a critical concept of injustice. It concentrates on injustice by focusing on three fundamental elements of Critical theory of society: critique, explanation, and normativity. Firstly, it clarifies the need for critical social criticism to have an internal character. Secondly, it concentrates on relations between individual elements of the above-mentioned trichotomy, and stresses the consequences of such an analysis for a Critical social theory. It shows that only an articulation of all three elements in their mutual constitutive relations will enable to work out a critical concept of in/justice. Keywords: Injustice. Justice. Critical Theory. Critique. Explanation. Normativity. A theory of justice requires a critical concept of injustice2. I will articulate such a concept from the point of view of Critical Theory of Society. I will analyze three fundamental elements of Critical Theory – critique, explanation and normativity – which can be identified already in the initial programmatic documents of the founders of Critical Theory (the Frankfurt School), and consequently mapped in texts of their followers up until today. Although these elements have been present in Critical Theory since its beginning, and their existence was an implicit precondition for Critical Theory, they have been articulated only vaguely in their complex mutual relations. This is because only some of these elements have as a rule been addressed, and because just a few of the relations between them have been discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relationship Between Fuzzy Autoepistemic Logic and Fuzzy Modal Logics of Belief
    JID:FSS AID:6759 /FLA [m3SC+; v1.204; Prn:31/03/2015; 9:42] P.1(1-26) Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Fuzzy Sets and Systems ••• (••••) •••–••• www.elsevier.com/locate/fss On the relationship between fuzzy autoepistemic logic and fuzzy modal logics of belief ∗ Marjon Blondeel d, ,1, Tommaso Flaminio a,2, Steven Schockaert b, Lluís Godo c,3, Martine De Cock d,e a Università dell’Insubria, Department of Theorical and Applied Science, Via Mazzini 5, 21100 Varese, Italy b Cardiff University, School of Computer Science and Informatics, 5The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK c Artficial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA) – CSIC, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain d Ghent University, Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Krijgslaan 281 (S9), 9000 Gent, Belgium e University of Washington Tacoma – Center for Web and Data Science, 1900 Commerce Street, Tacoma, WA 98402-3100, USA Received 12 February 2014; received in revised form 30 September 2014; accepted 26 February 2015 Abstract Autoepistemic logic is an important formalism for nonmonotonic reasoning originally intended to model an ideal rational agent reflecting upon his own beliefs. Fuzzy autoepistemic logic is a generalization of autoepistemic logic that allows to represent an agent’s rational beliefs on gradable propositions. It has recently been shown that, in the same way as autoepistemic logic generalizes answer set programming, fuzzy autoepistemic logic generalizes fuzzy answer set programming as well. Besides being related to answer set programming, autoepistemic logic is also closely related to several modal logics. To investigate whether a similar relationship holds in a fuzzy logical setting, we firstly generalize the main modal logics for belief to the setting of finitely-valued c Łukasiewicz logic with truth constants Łk, and secondly we relate them with fuzzy autoepistemic logics.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequence and Degrees of Truth in Many-Valued Logic
    Consequence and degrees of truth in many-valued logic Josep Maria Font Published as Chapter 6 (pp. 117–142) of: Peter Hájek on Mathematical Fuzzy Logic (F. Montagna, ed.) vol. 6 of Outstanding Contributions to Logic, Springer-Verlag, 2015 Abstract I argue that the definition of a logic by preservation of all degrees of truth is a better rendering of Bolzano’s idea of consequence as truth- preserving when “truth comes in degrees”, as is often said in many-valued contexts, than the usual scheme that preserves only one truth value. I review some results recently obtained in the investigation of this proposal by applying techniques of abstract algebraic logic in the framework of Łukasiewicz logics and in the broader framework of substructural logics, that is, logics defined by varieties of (commutative and integral) residuated lattices. I also review some scattered, early results, which have appeared since the 1970’s, and make some proposals for further research. Keywords: many-valued logic, mathematical fuzzy logic, truth val- ues, truth degrees, logics preserving degrees of truth, residuated lattices, substructural logics, abstract algebraic logic, Leibniz hierarchy, Frege hierarchy. Contents 6.1 Introduction .............................2 6.2 Some motivation and some history ...............3 6.3 The Łukasiewicz case ........................8 6.4 Widening the scope: fuzzy and substructural logics ....9 6.5 Abstract algebraic logic classification ............. 12 6.6 The Deduction Theorem ..................... 16 6.7 Axiomatizations ........................... 18 6.7.1 In the Gentzen style . 18 6.7.2 In the Hilbert style . 19 6.8 Conclusions .............................. 21 References .................................. 23 1 6.1 Introduction Let me begin by calling your attention to one of the main points made by Petr Hájek in the introductory, vindicating section of his influential book [34] (the italics are his): «Logic studies the notion(s) of consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability and Statistics
    FLORENTIN SMARANDACHE A UNIFYING FIELD IN LOGICS: NEUTROSOPHIC LOGIC. NEUTROSOPHY, NEUTROSOPHIC SET, NEUTROSOPHIC PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS (fourth edition) NL(A1 A2) = ( T1 ({1}T2) T2 ({1}T1) T1T2 ({1}T1) ({1}T2), I1 ({1}I2) I2 ({1}I1) I1 I2 ({1}I1) ({1} I2), F1 ({1}F2) F2 ({1} F1) F1 F2 ({1}F1) ({1}F2) ). NL(A1 A2) = ( {1}T1T1T2, {1}I1I1I2, {1}F1F1F2 ). NL(A1 A2) = ( ({1}T1T1T2) ({1}T2T1T2), ({1} I1 I1 I2) ({1}I2 I1 I2), ({1}F1F1 F2) ({1}F2F1 F2) ). ISBN 978-1-59973-080-6 American Research Press Rehoboth 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005 FLORENTIN SMARANDACHE A UNIFYING FIELD IN LOGICS: NEUTROSOPHIC LOGIC. NEUTROSOPHY, NEUTROSOPHIC SET, NEUTROSOPHIC PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS (fourth edition) NL(A1 A2) = ( T1 ({1}T2) T2 ({1}T1) T1T2 ({1}T1) ({1}T2), I1 ({1}I2) I2 ({1}I1) I1 I2 ({1}I1) ({1} I2), F1 ({1}F2) F2 ({1} F1) F1 F2 ({1}F1) ({1}F2) ). NL(A1 A2) = ( {1}T1T1T2, {1}I1I1I2, {1}F1F1F2 ). NL(A1 A2) = ( ({1}T1T1T2) ({1}T2T1T2), ({1} I1 I1 I2) ({1}I2 I1 I2), ({1}F1F1 F2) ({1}F2F1 F2) ). ISBN 978-1-59973-080-6 American Research Press Rehoboth 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005 1 Contents: Preface by C. Le: 3 0. Introduction: 9 1. Neutrosophy - a new branch of philosophy: 15 2. Neutrosophic Logic - a unifying field in logics: 90 3. Neutrosophic Set - a unifying field in sets: 125 4. Neutrosophic Probability - a generalization of classical and imprecise probabilities - and Neutrosophic Statistics: 129 5. Addenda: Definitions derived from Neutrosophics: 133 2 Preface to Neutrosophy and Neutrosophic Logic by C.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading T. S. Eliot Reading Spinoza
    READING T. S. ELIOT READING SPINOZA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Yoshiaki Mihara January 2013 © 2013 Yoshiaki Mihara READING T. S. ELIOT READING SPINOZA Yoshiaki Mihara, Ph. D. Cornell University 2013 “[The ordinary man] falls in love, or reads Spinoza, and these two experiences have nothing to do with each other” – a good reader of T. S. Eliot’s criticism probably knows this famous passage; a good researcher on Eliot’s apprenticeship in philosophy perhaps knows that he did actually read Spinoza; and yet, in the current Eliot studies, reading Eliot and reading Spinoza seem to have nothing to do with each other. In this dissertation, I attempt to reconstruct Eliot’s reading of Spinoza as faithfully and comprehensively as possible, by closely analyzing the marginalia in Eliot’s copy of Spinoza’s Opera, housed in the Archive Centre of King’s College, Cambridge. At the same time, the Spinozist context for Eliot’s apprenticeship at Harvard and Oxford (with the intermission of “a romantic year” in Paris) is also to be presented, which is, in fact, a glaring absence in the philosophical branch of Eliot studies. In addition to these positivistic contributions, I also take a theoretical approach so as to demonstrate how illuminative Eliot’s reading of Spinoza can be for understanding the characteristic style (or “ethology”) of Eliot’s reading in general (i.e., Theory), by way of extensively analyzing the unpublished as well as published materials of Eliot’s “academic philosophizing” that culminated in his doctoral dissertation on F.
    [Show full text]
  • Modality and Factivity: One Perspective on the Meaning of the English Modal Auxiliaries
    MODALITY AND FACTIVITY: ONE PERSPECTIVE ON THE MEANING OF THE ENGLISH MODAL AUXILIARIES by NICOLA M,BREWER Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds Department of Linguistics and Phonetics December 1987 ii ABSTRACT This study concentrates on modality as expressed by the set of modal auxiliaries and seeks to establish that these verbs share semantic as well as syntactic properties by identifying a single core meaning which they share. The relationship between modality and factivity is examined with the aim of gaining an insight into the former, more complex concept. When viewed from this perspective, the defining characteristic of all the modal auxiliary verbs in almost all of their uses is found to be nonfactivity. The meanings expressed by this set of verbs are classified according to a framework derived from modal logic consisting of three basic types of modality each of which relates to a different set of laws or principles; the relative factivity associated with the modal auxiliaries is seen to vary with the nature of modality as defined and classified by this framework. Within each of the three types of modality, a semantic scale is identified and modality is described as a gradable concept for which scalar analysis is appropriate, both within and beyond these three scales. Relative factivity is also shown to vary according to the degree of modality expressed by each of the modal verbs. The nature and degree of modality expressed interact with features of the linguistic (and pragmatic) context to determine the particular factive or a contrafactive interpretation conveyed by a given modal auxiliary token.
    [Show full text]
  • Irrationality and Human Reasoning Michael Aristidou Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2004 Irrationality and human reasoning Michael Aristidou Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Aristidou, Michael, "Irrationality and human reasoning" (2004). LSU Master's Theses. 2918. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2918 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IRRATIONALITY AND HUMAN REASONING A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Philosophy by Michael Aristidou BSc, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1999 MSc, Louisiana State University, 2001 May, 2004 To my parents Theodotos and Kristia, to my sister Eliza, and to my brother Konstantinos for all their love and support through all these years. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Jon Cogburn for his great patience and valuable instruction on my thesis. I would also like to thank, Dr. Mary Sirridge for her advising and help through my graduate years in Philosophy, the members of my thesis committee Dr. Husain Sarkar and Dr. Ian Crystal for their cooperation, and Taneka Welch for her constant willingness to discuss issues related to my thesis, and her technical support.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| Critical Approaches to Security 1St Edition
    CRITICAL APPROACHES TO SECURITY 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Laura J Shepherd | 9781135127992 | | | | | Critical security studies It thus aims to help students to master major writings and thinking in the field, and to support their own MA dissertation projects. Details This module appears in the following module collections. Organized around a range of core concepts that have defined various critical approaches, the book guides the reader through a wide range of literature and debates. Boundaries Of Contagion: How Others see critical security studies as a distinct approach in its own right committed to emancipatory theory. Civic Discipline: Geography In Develop reasoned arguments, synthesise relevant information and exercise critical judgement. Notes Credit level 7. The module outlines the main traditional and critical approaches to security, discussing competing ideas and criticism on various theoretical approaches in the study of security. Gather, organise and deploy evidence, data and information from a variety of secondary and primary sources. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. Demonstrate a strong capacity to conduct independent research in the field of critical security and conflict analysis, integrating conceptual and empirical issues. With a careful explication of core concepts in each chapter and an introduction that traces the development of critical approaches to security, this textbook will encourage all those who engage with it to develop a curiosity about the study
    [Show full text]