Checklist of the Grasses of India 1 Doi: 10.3897/Phytokeys.163.38393 CHECKLIST Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Checklist of the Grasses of India 1 Doi: 10.3897/Phytokeys.163.38393 CHECKLIST Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 163: 1–560 (2020) Checklist of the grasses of India 1 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.163.38393 CHECKLIST http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the grasses of India Elizabeth A. Kellogg1, J. Richard Abbott2,8, Kamaljit S. Bawa3, Kanchi N. Gandhi4, B. R. Kailash5, K.N. Ganeshaiah6, Uttam Babu Shrestha7, Peter Raven2 1 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 North Warson Rd., St. Louis, MO 63132, USA 2 Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA 3 University of Massachusetts Boston, Col- lege of Science and Mathematics, Boston, MA 02125, USA 4 Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 5 Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Srirampura, Jakkur post, Bangalore-560094, India 6 University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, India 7 Institute for Life Sciences and the Environment, University of Southern Queensland, Australia 8 School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, The University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, AR 71655, USA Corresponding author: Elizabeth A. Kellogg ([email protected]) Academic editor: Maria Vorontsova | Received 20 July 2019 | Accepted 22 January 2020 | Published 18 October 2020 Citation: Kellogg EA, Abbott JR, Bawa KS, Gandhi KN, Kailash BR, Ganeshaiah KN, Shrestha UB, Raven P (2020) Checklist of the grasses of India. PhytoKeys 163: 1–560. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.163.38393 Abstract A checklist of the grasses of India is presented, as compiled from survey of all available literature. Of the twelve subfamilies of grasses, ten are represented in India. Most subfamilies have been examined by taxonomic experts for up-to-date nomenclature. The list includes 1506 species plus infraspecific taxa and presents information on types, synonyms, distribution within India, and habit. Twelve new combinations are made, viz. Arctopoa tibetica (Munro ex Stapf) Prob. var. aristulata (Stapf) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Chimonocalamus nagalan- dianus (H.B. Naithani) L.G. Clark, comb. nov.; Chionachne digitata (L.f.) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Chion- achne wallichiana (Nees) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Dinebra polystachyos (R. Br.) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Moorochloa eruciformis (Sm.) Veldkamp var. divaricata (Basappa & Muniv.) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Phyl- lostachys nigra (Lodd. ex Lindl.) Munro var. puberula (Miq.) Kailash, comb. & stat. nov.; Tzveleviochloa schmidii (Hook. f.) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Urochloa lata (Schumach.) C.E. Hubb. var. pubescens (C.E. Hubb.) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Urochloa ramosa (L.) T.Q. Nguyen var. pubescens (Basappa & Muniy.) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov.; Urochloa semiundulata (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Ashalatha & V.J. Nair var. intermedia (Basappa & Muniy.) E.A. Kellogg, comb. nov. Keywords Poaceae, taxonomy, biodiversity, biogeography, south Asia Copyright Elizabeth A. Kellogg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Elizabeth A. Kellogg et al. / PhytoKeys 163: 1–560 (2020) Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Background and methods ......................................................................................... 4 Checklist .................................................................................................................. 5 Poaceae Barnh., 1895, nom. cons. ........................................................................ 5 Subfamily Pharoideae L. G. Clark & Judz., 1996 ............................................. 6 Subfamily Bambusoideae Luerss., 1893 ............................................................ 7 Tribe Arundinarieae Asch. & Graebn., 1902 ............................................... 7 Tribe Bambuseae Kunth ex Dumort., 1829 ............................................... 22 Subfamily Oryzoideae Kunth x Beilschm. (1833) ........................................... 54 Tribe Ehrharteae Nevski, 1937 ................................................................... 54 Tribe Oryzeae Dumort. (1824) .................................................................. 57 Tribe Streptogyneae C.E. Hubb. ex C.E. Calderón & Soderstr. (1980) ...... 65 Subfamily Pooideae Benth., 1861 ................................................................... 65 Tribe Nardeae W. D. J. Koch, 1837 ........................................................... 66 Tribe Phaenospermateae Renvoize & Clayton, 1985 .................................. 66 Tribe Duthieeae Röser & Jul. Schneid., Syst. Biodivers. 9(1): 41. 2011. ..... 67 Tribe Meliceae Link ex Endl., 1830 ............................................................ 68 Tribe Stipeae Dumort., 1824 ..................................................................... 71 Tribe Brachypodieae Harz, 1880 ................................................................ 83 Tribe Bromeae Dumort., 1824 ................................................................... 85 Tribe Triticeae Dumort., 1824 ................................................................... 91 Tribe Poeae R. Br., 1814 .......................................................................... 111 Subfamily Aristidoideae Caro, 1982 ............................................................. 196 Subfamily Panicoideae A. Braun, 1864 ......................................................... 202 Incertae sedis: ........................................................................................... 203 Tribe Centotheceae Ridl., 1907 ................................................................ 203 Tribe Chasmanthieae W.V. Br. & B.N. Smith ex Sánchez-Ken & L.G. Clark, 2010 ........................................................................................................ 206 Tribe Paspaleae J. Presl, 1830 ................................................................... 207 Tribe Paniceae R. Br., 1814 ...................................................................... 217 Tribe Jansenelleae Voronts., 2020 ............................................................. 298 Tribe Andropogoneae Dumort., 1824 ...................................................... 299 Subfamily Danthonioideae N.P. Barker & H.P. Linder, 2001 ....................... 453 Subfamily Chloridoideae Kunth ex Beilschm., 1833 .................................... 456 Incertae sedis ............................................................................................ 456 Tribe Centropodieae P.M. Peterson, N.P. Barker & H.P. Linder, 2011 ..... 458 Tribe Triraphideae P.M. Peterson, 2010 .................................................... 459 Tribe Eragrostideae Stapf, 1898 ................................................................ 460 Tribe Zoysieae Benth., 1881 .................................................................... 479 Tribe Cynodonteae Dumort., 1824 .......................................................... 488 Subfamily Micrairoideae Pilg., 1956 ............................................................ 529 Checklist of the grasses of India 3 Subfamily Arundinoideae Kunth ex Beilschm., 1833 ................................... 543 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 546 References ............................................................................................................ 547 Index to Genera ................................................................................................... 557 Introduction The following is a checklist of the grasses of India, produced as part of the Plants of India project. The grass family has been the subject of two major new classifications, Kellogg (2015b) and Soreng et al. (2015, 2017), based on phylogenetic data. Even before these ap- peared, molecular phylogenies had resolved circumscription of the subfamilies and there has been general agreement for at least the last 15 years on the monophyly of the major subfamilies. Nearly all known genera have been firmly assigned to subfamily and a large majority to tribe. Division into subtribes remains an item of discussion in some groups. The two current classifications are quite similar, which is not surprising since they are based on the same underlying data and phylogenies. Many of the differences reflect simply different preferences for classification. Kellogg (2015b) generally avoids mono- generic tribes or subtribes on the grounds that they convey no phylogenetic informa- tion and are unnecessary. This means that, while all genera are assigned to subfamily, the smaller subfamilies (e.g. Pharoideae) are not divided into tribes. In contrast, Soreng et al. (2015, 2017) prefer consistency in the use of ranks throughout the classification, meaning that all subfamilies include tribes, even if or when the tribes are unnecessary from the point of view of identification or phylogeny. The same arguments apply to subtribes. The Soreng et al. (2015, 2017) classification is thus more split than Kellogg (2015b). In addition, there are a few differences in generic circumscription. Because Kellogg (2015b) appeared in book form, it really represents the state of data a couple of years earlier, whereas Soreng et al. (2017) includes more recent information. All grass
Recommended publications
  • Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Tyrrell, Christopher Dean, "Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15419. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15419 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) by Christopher Dean Tyrrell A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Lynn G. Clark, Major Professor Dennis V. Lavrov Robert S. Wallace Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 Copyright © Christopher Dean Tyrrell, 2008. All rights reserved. 1457571 1457571 2008 ii In memory of Thomas D. Tyrrell Festum Asinorum iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 Background and Significance 1 Research Objectives 5 Thesis Organization 6 Literature Cited 6 CHAPTER 2. PHYLOGENY OF THE BAMBOO SUBTRIBE 9 ARTHROSTYLIDIINAE WITH EMPHASIS ON RHIPIDOCLADUM Abstract 9 Introduction 10 Methods and Materials 13 Results 19 Discussion 25 Taxonomic Treatment 26 Literature Cited 31 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synopsis of Thai Apocopis Nees (Poaceae, Panicoideae)
    THAI FOR. BULL. (BOT.) 38: 150–159. 2010. A synopsis of Thai Apocopis Nees (Poaceae, Panicoideae) ATCHARA TEERAWATANANON1, SARAWOOD SUNGKAEW2*, VEERAYA BOONTIA3 & TREVOR R. HODKINSON4 ABSTRACT. A synopsis of the genus Apocopis occurring in Thailand is presented, including a key to the species, correct nomencla- ture, descriptions and illustrations. Six species are recognised, of which four species are lectotypifi ed. KEY WORDS: Panicoideae, Apocopis, Thailand. INTRODUCTION 222. 1900; E.G.Camus & A.Camus in H.Lecomte, The genus Apocopis Nees (Poaceae, Fl. Indo-Chine 7: 291. 1922; Bor, Kew Bull. 1: Panicoideae) consists of about 15 species, chiefl y 102. 1952; Schmid, Fl. Agrostologique de distributed in India, China, Southeast Asia to l’Indochine 13(1): 179. 1958; Bor, Grasses Burma, Polynesia (Clayton and Renvoize, 1986; Watson Ceyl., Ind. & Pakist.: 94. 1960; Roberty, Monogr. and Dallwitz, 1992; Clayton et al., 2006). Apocopis Syst. Andropog. du Globe. (Theses Fac. Sci. was originally described by Nees von Esenbeck Toulouse): 324. 1960; Lazarides, The Tropical (1841) to include A. royleanus (now Apocopis Grasses of Southeast Asia: 19. 1980; Clayton & paleacea (Trin.) Hochr.), using the specimen of Dr Renvoize, Kew Bull. Add. Ser. 13: 316. 1986; J. F. Royle, from India. It is characterised by an Gould in Dassanayake, Fosberg and Clayton, Rev. infl orescence which is composed of spike-like Handb. Fl. Ceylon 8: 37. 1994; S.L.Chen & racemes consisting of a fragile rhachis that bears S.M.Phillips, Fl. China 22: 598. 2006.— the imbricate fertile sessile spikelets with broadly Amblyachyrum Hochst., Flora 39: 25. 1856. truncate lower glumes and pedicelled spikelets Annual or perennial, tufted or shortly rhi- which are normally suppressed (Bor, 1952, Clayton zomatous.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALOGUE of the GRASSES of CUBA by A. S. Hitchcock
    CATALOGUE OF THE GRASSES OF CUBA By A. S. Hitchcock. INTRODUCTION. The following list of Cuban grasses is based primarily upon the collections at the Estaci6n Central Agron6mica de Cuba, situated at Santiago de las Vegas, a suburb of Habana. The herbarium includes the collections made by the members of the staff, particularly Mr. C. F. Baker, formerly head of the department of botany, and also the Sauvalle Herbarium deposited by the Habana Academy of Sciences, These specimens were examined by the writer during a short stay upon the island in the spring of 1906, and were later kindly loaned by the station authorities for a more critical study at Washington. The Sauvalle Herbarium contains a fairly complete set of the grasses col- lected by Charles Wright, the most important collection thus far obtained from Cuba. In addition to the collections at the Cuba Experiment Station, the National Herbarium furnished important material for study, including collections made by A. H. Curtiss, W. Palmer and J. H. Riley, A. Taylor (from the Isle of Pines), S. M. Tracy, Brother Leon (De la Salle College, Habana), and the writer. The earlier collections of Wright were sent to Grisebach for study. These were reported upon by Grisebach in his work entitled "Cata- logus Plant arum Cubensium," published in 1866, though preliminary reports appeared earlier in the two parts of Plantae Wrightianae. * During the spring of 1907 I had the opportunity of examining the grasses in the herbarium of Grisebach in Gottingen.6 In the present article I have, with few exceptions, accounted for the grasses listed by Grisebach in his catalogue of Cuban plants, and have appended a list of these with references to the pages in the body of this article upon which the species are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Weeds of Coastal Plains and Heathy Forests Bioregions of Victoria Heading in Band
    Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band b Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of the list 1 Limitations 1 Relationship to statutory lists 1 Composition of the list and assessment of taxa 2 Categories of environmental weeds 5 Arrangement of the list 5 Column 1: Botanical Name 5 Column 2: Common Name 5 Column 3: Ranking Score 5 Column 4: Listed in the CALP Act 1994 5 Column 5: Victorian Alert Weed 5 Column 6: National Alert Weed 5 Column 7: Weed of National Significance 5 Statistics 5 Further information & feedback 6 Your involvement 6 Links 6 Weed identification texts 6 Citation 6 Acknowledgments 6 Bibliography 6 Census reference 6 Appendix 1 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed alphabetically within risk categories. 7 Appendix 2 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by botanical name. 19 Appendix 3 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by common name. 31 Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria i Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, March2008 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Arundinelleae; Panicoideae; Poaceae)
    Bothalia 19, 1:45-52(1989) Kranz distinctive cells in the culm of ArundineUa (Arundinelleae; Panicoideae; Poaceae) EVANGELINA SANCHEZ*, MIRTA O. ARRIAGA* and ROGER P. ELLIS** Keywords: anatomy, Arundinella, C4, culm, distinctive cells, double bundle sheath, NADP-me ABSTRACT The transectional anatomy of photosynthetic flowering culms of Arundinella berteroniana (Schult.) Hitchc. & Chase and A. hispida (Willd.) Kuntze from South America and A. nepalensis Trin. from Africa is described and illustrated. The vascular bundles are arranged in three distinct rings, the outermost being external to a continuous sclerenchymatous band. Each of these peripheral bundles is surrounded by two bundle sheaths, a complete mestome sheath and an incomplete, outer, parenchymatous Kranz sheath, the cells of which contain large, specialized chloroplasts. Kranz bundle sheath extensions are also present. The chlorenchyma tissue is also located in this narrow peripheral zone and is interrupted by the vascular bundles and their associated sclerenchyma. Dispersed throughout the chlorenchyma are small groups of Kranz distinctive cells, identical in structure to the outer bundle sheath cells. No chlorenchyma cell is. therefore, more than two cells distant from a Kranz cell. The structure of the chlorenchyma and bundle sheaths indicates that the C4 photosynthetic pathway is operative in these culms. This study clearly demonstrates the presence of the peculiar distinctive cells in the culms as well as in the leaves of Arundinella. Also of interest is the presence of an inner bundle sheath in the vascular bundles of the culm whereas the bundles of the leaves possess only a single sheath. It has already been shown that Arundinella is a NADP-me C4 type and the anatomical predictor of a single Kranz sheath for NADP-me species, therefore, either does not hold in the culms of this genus or the culms are not NADP-me.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Size Variation in the Genus Avena
    Genome Genome size variation in the genus Avena Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2015-0132.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 01-Dec-2015 Complete List of Authors: Yan, Honghai; Triticeae Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural University, Martin, Sara; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Bekele, Wubishet; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Latta, Robert;Draft Dalhousie University, Department of Biology Diederichsen, Axel; Plant Gene Resources of Canada, Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada Peng, Yuanying; Triticeae Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural University Tinker, Nicholas; Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre Keyword: Oat, flow cytometry, nucleus, polyploidy https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 41 Genome Genome size variation in the genus Avena ab a a c d Honghai Yan , Sara L. Martin , Wubishet A. Bekele , Robert G. Latta , Axel Diederichsen , Yuanying Peng b, Nicholas A. Tinker a* *correspondence a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 930 Carling Ave., Bldg. 50, C.E.F., Ottawa ON K1A0C6 Canada b Triticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China Draft c Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford St. Halifax NS B3H4R2 Canada d Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Plant Gene Resources of Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon SK S7N0X2 Canada https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Genome Page 2 of 41 Abstract Genome size is an indicator of evolutionary distance and a metric for genome characterization. Here, we report accurate estimates of genome size in 99 accessions from 26 species of Avena . We demonstrate that the average genome size of C genome diploid species (2C=10.26 pg) is 15% larger than that of A genome species (2C=8.95 pg) and that this difference likely accounts for a progression of size among tetraploid species, where AB < AC < CC (average 2C=16.76 pg, 18.60 pg, and 21.78 pg, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological, Anatomical, and Taxonomic Studies in Anomochloa and Streptochaeta (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 68 Morphological, Anatomical, and Taxonomic Studies in Anomochloa and Streptochaeta (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Emmet J. Judziewicz and Thomas R. Soderstrom SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS Washington, D.C. 1989 ABSTRACT Judziewicz, Emmet J., and Thomas R. Soderstrom. Morphological, Anatomical, and Taxonomic Studies in Anomochloa and Streptochaeta (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, number 68,52 pages, 24 figures, 1 table, 1989.-Although resembling the core group of the bambusoid grasses in many features of leaf anatomy, the Neotropical rainforest grass genera Anomochloa and Streptochaeta share characters that are unusual in the subfamily: lack of ligules, exceptionally long microhairs with an unusual morphology, a distinctive leaf blade midrib structure, and 5-nerved coleoptiles. Both genera also possess inflorescences that are difficult to interpret in conventional agrostological terms. Anomochloa is monotypic, and A. marantoidea, described in 1851 by Adolphe Brongniart from cultivated material of uncertain provenance, was rediscovered in 1976 in the wet forests of coastal Bahia, Brazil. The inflorescence terminates in a spikelet and bears along its rachis several scorpioid cyme-like partial inflorescences. Each axis of a partial inflorescence is subtended by a keeled bract and bears as its first appendages two tiny, unvascularized bracteoles attached at slightly different levels. The spikelets are composed of an axis that bears two bracts and terminates in a flower. The lower, chlorophyllous, deciduous spikelet bract is separated from the coriaceous, persistent, corniculate upper bract by a cylindrical, indurate internode. The flower consists of a low membrane surmounted by a dense ring of brown cilia (perigonate annulus) surrounding the andrecium of four stamens, and an ovary bearing a single hispid stigma.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Germainia (Andropogoneae: Poaceae) in Thailand
    Blumea 57, 2013: 221–228 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651913X663442 A taxonomic revision of Germainia (Andropogoneae: Poaceae) in Thailand A. Teerawatananon1,3, S. Sungkaew2,3*, V. Boontia4, T.R. Hodkinson5 Key words Abstract A taxonomic revision of the genus Germainia (Andropogoneae, Poaceae) in Thailand is presented based on herbarium and field studies, including evidence from morphology, habitats and geographical distribu- Andropogoneae tion. Six of the nine recognized Germainia species are found in Thailand. We include a key to the taxa that are Germainia currently known from Thailand or may be expected, lists of species synonymies, species descriptions and lists of Poaceae representative specimens. Thailand Published on 17 January 2013 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Germainia Balansa & Poitr. is a small genus in the tribe Andro­ There were two main sources of specimens used in this study: pogoneae (Poaceae) comprising nine species and distributed specimens collected from fieldwork in Thailand and herbarium in E India (Assam), S Myanmar (Tenasserim), Indo-China specimens, also from other areas, obtained from the following (Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, S Vietnam), S China (Guangdong herbaria: AAU, ABD, BK, BKF, BM, C, E, GH, K, KKU, L, NY, (Canton), Yunnan), Indonesia (Aru Isl., Indonesian Papua), SING, TCD, US and the Herbarium of Natural History Museum, Papua New Guinea (Central, Sandaun (W Sepik), Western National Science Museum, Technopolis, Pathum Thani, Thai- Prov.), and Australia (Northern Territory, N Queensland) (Chai- land. Four field trips, totalling a period of five months were made Anan 1972, Chen & Phillips 2006, Chen et al. 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Flammability Across the Vascular Plant Phylogeny, with Special Emphasis on the Genus Dracophyllum
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy at Lincoln University by Xinglei Cui Lincoln University 2020 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy. Abstract Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum by Xinglei Cui Fire has been part of the environment for the entire history of terrestrial plants and is a common disturbance agent in many ecosystems across the world. Fire has a significant role in influencing the structure, pattern and function of many ecosystems. Plant flammability, which is the ability of a plant to burn and sustain a flame, is an important driver of fire in terrestrial ecosystems and thus has a fundamental role in ecosystem dynamics and species evolution. However, the factors that have influenced the evolution of flammability remain unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonpland and Humboldt Specimens, Field Notes, and Herbaria; New Insights from a Study of the Monocotyledons Collected in Venezuela
    Bonpland and Humboldt specimens, field notes, and herbaria; new insights from a study of the monocotyledons collected in Venezuela Fred W. Stauffer, Johann Stauffer & Laurence J. Dorr Abstract Résumé STAUFFER, F. W., J. STAUFFER & L. J. DORR (2012). Bonpland and STAUFFER, F. W., J. STAUFFER & L. J. DORR (2012). Echantillons de Humboldt specimens, field notes, and herbaria; new insights from a study Bonpland et Humboldt, carnets de terrain et herbiers; nouvelles perspectives of the monocotyledons collected in Venezuela. Candollea 67: 75-130. tirées d’une étude des monocotylédones récoltées au Venezuela. Candollea In English, English and French abstracts. 67: 75-130. En anglais, résumés anglais et français. The monocotyledon collections emanating from Humboldt and Les collections de Monocotylédones provenant des expéditions Bonpland’s expedition are used to trace the complicated ways de Humboldt et Bonpland sont utilisées ici pour retracer les in which botanical specimens collected by the expedition were cheminements complexes des spécimens collectés lors returned to Europe, to describe the present location and to de leur retour en Europe. Ces collections sont utilisées pour explore the relationship between specimens, field notes, and établir la localisation actuelle et la composition d’importants descriptions published in the multi-volume “Nova Genera et jeux de matériel associés à ce voyage, ainsi que pour explorer Species Plantarum” (1816-1825). Collections in five European les relations existantes entre les spécimens, les notes de terrain herbaria were searched for monocotyledons collected by et les descriptions parues dans les divers volumes de «Nova the explorers. In Paris, a search of the Bonpland Herbarium Genera et Species Plantarum» (1816-1825).
    [Show full text]