DOCSLIB.ORG

Traineeship Brochure 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Traineeship Brochure 2020 TRAINEESHIP BROCHURE 2020 Matrix is ‘the future of the Bar.’ Chambers and Partners TRAINEESHIP BROCHURE CONTENTS • Introduction to Matrix- page 2 • Why choose Matrix?- page 2 • Glossary - plain words- page 2 • Becoming a barrister - page 3 • Areas of work - page 3 • Training schedule - page 3 • Life as a trainee - page 4 • Application procedure- page 6 • Deferred applications- page 6 • Third six- page 6 • Training awards- page 6 • Visa requirements- page 6 • Information for applicants who have a disability- page 6 • Traineeship supervisors- page 7 • Matrix Selection procedure - page 10 • Stage 1- page 10 • Stage 2- page 11 • Stage 3- page 11 • Notes regarding the application form- page 12 • Equal Opportunities- page 12 • Useful contacts- page 12 • Matrix Core Values- page 13 • Members- page 15 1 INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX Matrix is a barristers’ chambers located in hierarchies and attitudes demonstrated by our London, Geneva and Brussels. We are a members – all these elements make Matrix a collection of lawyers specialising in a wide really great place to train and to work. range of practice areas throughout the UK and Matrix is committed to providing a stimulating, internationally. Described as “professional and balanced and comprehensive training forward thinking”, we are an approachable schedule. As a junior member of Matrix, the set that are proud of our record of innovation. expectation is that you will be in court regularly Our core values govern the way we work and on a wide range of cases and practice areas outline our commitment to operating within an as this is a very important part of continuing environment where diversity, accessibility and training to be a fully-rounded barrister. client care are widely championed. Matrix has 73 full members, 14 associate members and 9 academic members, with two GLOSSARY- PLAIN WORDS current trainees and 33 members of staff. Since You may have already noticed some of the its foundation, Matrix has taken 40 trainees and linguistic touches that make Matrix different we have offered membership to 27 individuals from a more traditional set. We do not use who have completed their traineeship with us. the out-dated terminology of clerks and tenants, and are committed to accessibility in WHY CHOOSE MATRIX? all we do. We have something fresh to offer and people In this booklet we may resort to some of the have really begun to notice the difference. more standard terms, but these are the plain Chambers and Partners have noted that words we prefer to use everyday: “Matrix is an extremely professional and contemporary chambers, and a dream to work TRAINEESHIP PUPILLAGE with in terms of its professionalism”. Matrix was recommended in the main legal directories last year in a total of 55 practice areas. TRAINEE PUPIL It is primarily the people, their approach and attitude that makes the atmosphere at Matrix MEMBERS TENANTS different. Our bright, contemporary offices; our PRACTICE STAFF CLERKS commitment to quality of service and high-tech facilities; the friendly professionalism of our staff; and the lack of old-fashioned language, 2 INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX BECOMING A BARRISTER and administrative law, media, mutual assistance, Matrix’s traineeships constitute the “pupillage / prison, social welfare, and sports law. work-based learning component of Bar training” as set out by the BSB and are available to those Matrix has a very strong international following any of the following three pathways: presence, acting in more than 114 countries for three-step pathway, four-step pathway or governments, international corporations, legal integrated academic and vocational pathway. firms and individuals. We have offices in Brussels More information about pathways can be found and Geneva, and a dedicated brand for our here. international work, known as Matrix International. The purpose of traineeships is for aspiring TRAINING SCHEDULE barristers who have completed their academic The 12-month training period is split roughly and vocational components of training to into quarters. The training committee tends to gain practical training under the supervision choose who will supervise in the first quarter, of experienced barristers. You can find more whilst trainees are finding their feet, but trainees information about this component of your training are consulted throughout on what areas they to become a barrister on the BSB website here. would be interested in covering. It is expected Since October 2010 Matrix has taken on 40 that trainees will experience the wide range trainees and offered membership to individuals of work covered at Matrix with seats in varied following traineeship. practice areas throughout the year. There is a AREAS OF WORK scheduled programme of training that takes place throughout the year and can include internal and The members of Matrix practise in a range of external training, written and advocacy exercises, different areas of UK public and private law, the and secondments. In the third quarter trainees law of the European Union and the ECHR, and are given assessed exercises. These are usually public international law. Matrix acts for private in the form of one piece of written advice, two and public clients and has particular expertise in oral advocacy exercises (including submission of areas including: commercial, competition, crime, a skeleton argument before the ‘hearing’) and one data protection, defamation, discrimination, business development oral presentation. Matrix education, employment, environmental, trainees do not generally take on oral advocacy in extradition, fraud, freedom of information, human their own right until the last quarter. rights, immigration nationality and asylum, international arbitration, local government, public 4 LIFE AS A TRAINEE As a trainee at Matrix, I had unique exposure to high-profile, interesting and important cases in a range of practice areas, from public law and crime to media and employment law. I attended hearings at all levels, from the Magistrates’ Court and the Employment Tribunal to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. Traineeship is demanding and standards are high, but by the end of the year I realised how much I had learnt and developed as a lawyer, by having had the opportunity to work alongside barristers who are experts in their fields. I worked on a range of cases and drafted pleadings and advices, receiving regular feedback. “The atmosphere at Matrix is friendly and informal, and I was treated as a colleague from day one.” I also had a number of training sessions from members on specific practice areas, which was a great way of learning some practical tips. I was grateful for the opportunity to have three full seats of training before starting my own cases in my final seat. This gave me the support of my final supervisor as I made the transition to becoming a full member. The atmosphere at Matrix is friendly and informal, and I was treated as a colleague from day one. I was always encouraged to express my EMMA FOUBISTER opinions and contribute to discussions with other members. There is a great support network and I had regular meetings with a mentor throughout the year. A number of exciting opportunities were available to me, from writing for the UKSC blog and Inform, to spending a week with the legal team of a national newspaper. Trainees are encouraged to attend as many events as possible, ranging from interesting panel debates to drinks parties. Not only did this enable me to meet solicitors and keep abreast of new legal developments, it was a great way to get to know other members and the staff team. Emma Foubister was the 2017-2018 trainee at Matrix. She became a full Matrix member in 2018. 5 LIFE AS A TRAINEE Matrix is an incredibly friendly and supportive organisation, which is made up of exceptional lawyers who are supported by an excellent practice team and staff. I have thoroughly enjoyed my traineeship and feel privileged to have had the opportunity to be a trainee at Matrix. As a trainee, I was fortunate to have exposure to a number of interesting and important cases in a variety of practice areas, from proceedings before the EAT and the Court of Appeal to urgent applications for interim relief in judicial review proceedings. I attended hearings at all levels and in a number of forums, from the County Court and Employment Tribunal to the High Court, Competition Appeal Tribunal and Court of Appeal. “I was always invited to express my opinions and contribute to discussions with other members.” While traineeship is demanding and expectations are high, I genuinely enjoyed the challenge and feel grateful to have had the opportunity to work alongside and learn from barristers who are experts in their fields. I worked on a range of cases in a number of practice areas and completed a variety of tasks, ranging from drafting pleadings and advices, to preparing cross examination and reviewing witness evidence. My supervisors were incredibly ROISIN SWORDS-KIELEY supportive and offered regular and constructive feedback, which enabled me to improve and develop as lawyer. I also had a number of training sessions from members on specific practice areas; these were really useful and provided both practical tips and insight into areas of law that I had not yet been exposed to. More generally, over Thursday lunch or at other internal events, I was always invited to express my opinions and contribute to discussions with other members. I was encouraged to attend a number of networking and educational events both in person and (in light of the global pandemic) remotely. I particularly enjoyed attending the annual SEN law conference and chairing a webinar on ‘Covid-19, the law and trade unions’. Roisin Swords-Kieley was the 2019-2020 trainee at Matrix. She became a full Matrix member in 2020. 6 APPLICATION PROCEDURE Matrix has opted out of the Pupillage Gateway cases it is possible to apply for an extension, system and instead uses an application form provided that the total period of sponsorship for traineeship.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Traineeship Brochure 2020
    TRAINEESHIP BROCHURE 2020 Matrix is ‘the future of the Bar.’ Chambers and Partners TRAINEESHIP BROCHURE CONTENTS • Introduction to Matrix- page 2 • Why choose Matrix?- page 2 • Glossary - plain words- page 2 • Becoming a barrister - page 3 • Areas of work - page 3 • Training schedule - page 3 • Life as a trainee - page 4 • Application procedure- page 6 • Deferred applications- page 6 • Third six- page 6 • Training awards- page 6 • Visa requirements- page 6 • Information for applicants who have a disability- page 6 • Traineeship supervisors- page 7 • Matrix selection procedure - page 10 • Stage 1- page 9 • Stage 2- page 110 • Stage 3- page 11 • Notes regarding the application form- page 11 • Equal opportunities- page 11 • Useful contacts- page 11 • Matrix core values- page 12 • Members- page 13 1 INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX Matrix is a barristers’ chambers located in hierarchies and attitudes demonstrated by our London, Geneva and Brussels. We are a members – all these elements make Matrix a collection of lawyers specialising in a wide really great place to train and to work. range of practice areas throughout the UK and Matrix is committed to providing a stimulating, internationally. Described as “professional and balanced and comprehensive training forward thinking”, we are an approachable schedule. As a junior member of Matrix, the set that are proud of our record of innovation. expectation is that you will be in court regularly Our core values govern the way we work and on a wide range of cases and practice areas outline our commitment to operating within an as this is a very important part of continuing environment where diversity, accessibility and training to be a fully-rounded barrister.
    [Show full text]
  • Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons from British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2015 Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform, 55 Santa Clara L. Rev. 323 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAMING THE "FERAL BEAST"1 : CAUTIONARY LESSONS FROM BRITISH PRESS REFORM Lili Levi* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introdu ction ............................................................................ 324 I. British Press Reform, in Context ....................................... 328 A. Overview of the British Press Sector .................... 328 B. The British Approach to Newspaper Regulation.. 330 C. Phone-Hacking and the Leveson Inquiry Into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press ..... 331 D. Where Things Stand Now ...................................... 337 1. The Royal Charter ............................................. 339 2. IPSO and IM
    [Show full text]
  • MIND the GAP Private Power, Online Information Flows and EU Law
    MIND THE GAP Private Power, Online Information Flows and EU Law Angela Daly Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Laws of the European University Institute Florence, February 2015 (submission) European University Institute Department of Law Mind the Gap: Private Power, Online Information Flows and EU Law V Angela Daly Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of Laws of the European University Institute Examining Board Professor Giorgio Monti, European University Institute (EUI Supervisor) Professor Giovanni Sartor, European University Institute Professor Lilian Edwards, University of Strathclyde Professor Chris Marsden, University of Sussex © Angela Daly, 2015 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author SUMMARY This thesis examines how European Union law and regulation address concentrations of private economic power which impede free information flows on the Internet to the detriment of Internet users’ autonomy. In particular, competition law, sector specific regulation (if it exists), data protection and human rights law are considered and assessed to the extent they can tackle such concentrations of power for the benefit of users. Illustrative case studies - of Internet provision, search, mobile devices and app stores, and the cloud – are chosen to demonstrate the gaps that exist in current EU law and regulation when applied to concentrations of private power online. It is argued that these gaps exist due, in part, to current overarching trends guiding the regulation of economic power, namely neoliberalism, by which only the situation of market failures can invite ex ante rules, buoyed by the lobbying of regulators and legislators by those in possession of such economic power to achieve outcomes which favour their businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Hart Publishing 2015 Good Books for Lawyers
    Hart Publishing 2015 Good Books for Lawyers iBarcoder Trial iBarcoder Trial iBarcoder Trial ISBN 978-1-78225-696-0 9 781782 256960 iBarcoder Trial iBarcoder Trial iBarcoder Trial Hart Publishing Ltd. is an Imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing plc www.hartpub.co.uk iBarcoder Trial iBarcoder Trial iBarcoder Trial ISBN 978-1-78225-696-0 9 iBarcoder781782 256960 Trial iBarcoder Trial iBarcoder Trial Welcome 2014 saw the departure from Hart Publishing of its founder Richard Hart whose ambition for what a publisher should be and instinct for the highest quality scholarship over a 17 year period resulted in a treasure trove of good books for lawyers. It is my privilege, together with the Hart and the wider Bloomsbury team, to take the list forward and build on his rich legacy. I am very grateful for the warm and generous welcome which has been extended to me by Hart authors and I very much look forward to working with you in the future. Hart authors’ great tradition of prize winning scholarship continued unabated in 2014. In particular, I am delighted to congratulate James Goudkamp, author of Tort Law Defences and Jure Vidmar, author of Democratic Statehood in International Law who were awarded the 2014 SLS Peter Birks Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship (Joint Second Prize). Warm congratulations also go to Brian Sloan: his title Informal Carers and Private Law was awarded the University of Cambridge’s Yorke Prize. The prestigious American Society of International Law’s Francis Lieber Society Book Prize 2014 was awarded to Russell Buchan’s International Law and the Construction of the Liberal Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • A.C. Pigou and the 'Marshallian' Thought Style
    A.C. PIGOU AND THE ‘MARSHALLIAN’ THOUGHT STYLE A STUDY IN THE PHILOSOPHY AND MATHEMATICS UNDERLYING CAMBRIDGE ECONOMICS Karen Lovejoy Knight PALGRAVE STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought Series Editors Avi J. Cohen Department of Economics York University and University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada G.C. Harcourt School of Economics University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia Peter Kriesler School of Economics University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia Jan Toporowski Economics Department SOAS, University of London London, UK Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought publishes contri- butions by leading scholars, illuminating key events, theories and indi- viduals that have had a lasting impact on the development of modern-day economics. The topics covered include the development of economies, institutions and theories. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14585 Karen Lovejoy Knight A.C. Pigou and the ‘Marshallian’ Thought Style A Study in the Philosophy and Mathematics Underlying Cambridge Economics Karen Lovejoy Knight Independent Scholar Duncraig, WA, Australia Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought ISBN 978-3-030-01017-1 ISBN 978-3-030-01018-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01018-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018959362 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and trans- mission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Immediation II
    Immediation II Edited by Erin Manning, Anna Munster, Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen Immediation II Immediations Series Editor: SenseLab “Philosophy begins in wonder. And, at the end, when philosophic thought has done its best, the wonder remains” – A.N. Whitehead The aim of the Immediations book series is to prolong the wonder sustaining philosophic thought into transdisciplinary encounters. Its premise is that concepts are for the enacting: they must be experienced. Thought is lived, else it expires. It is most intensely lived at the crossroads of practices, and in the in-between of individuals and their singular endeavors: enlivened in the weave of a relational fabric. Co-composition. “The smile spreads over the face, as the face fits itself onto the smile” – A. N. Whitehead Which practices enter into co-composition will be left an open question, to be answered by the Series authors. Art practice, aesthetic theory, political theory, movement practice, media theory, maker culture, science studies, architecture, philosophy … the range is free. We invite you to roam it. Immediation II Edited by Erin Manning, Anna Munster, Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen OPEN HUMANITIES PRESS London 2019 First edition published by Open Humanities Press 2019. Copyright © 2019, Erin Manning, Anna Munster, Bodil Marie Stavning Thomsen. Chapters copyright their respective authors unless otherwise noted. This is an open access book, licensed under Creative Commons By Attribution Share Alike license. Under this license, authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy their work so long as the authors and source are cited and resulting derivative works are licensed under the same or similar license.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Wide Open’ Is the Third Set of Working Papers in a Series from the Centre for Law Justice and Journalism at City University London
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE 0 provided by City Research Online &HQWUHIRU/DZ-XVWLFH DQG-RXUQDOLVP &/-- -867,&(:,'(23(1 :25.,1*3$3(56 (GLWRU-XGLWK7RZQHQG $XWKRUV(PLO\$OOERQ'DYLG%DQLVDU+HDWKHU%URRNH3URIHVVRU,DQ&UDP0LNH'RGG 'U'DYLG*ROGEHUJ1LFN+ROPHV'U/DZUHQFH0F1DPDUD/RUG1HXEHUJHU:LOOLDP3HUULQ *HRIIUH\5REHUWVRQ4&/XF\6HULHV+XJK7RPOLQVRQ4&3URIHVVRU+RZDUG7XPEHU $GDP:DJQHU Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism (CLJJ) The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism is the first major interdisciplinary centre in the UK to develop a broad, yet focused, interface between law, justice and journalism in society. The centre aims to harness and maximise opportunities for research collaboration, knowledge transfer and teaching to become an international centre of excellence and brings together expertise in the disciplines of Law, Criminology and Journalism at City University London. CLJJ Working Papers: ‘Justice Wide Open’ is the third set of working papers in a series from the Centre for Law Justice and Journalism at City University London. This publication by leading lawyers, academics and journalists is part of the CLJJ’s new ‘Open Justice in the Digital Era’ project, launched at an event at City University London on 29 February 2012. Leadership and Expertise: The Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism (CLJJ) is directed by three of City University London’s leading academics, as well as being supported by a number of specialists from the university. Professor Howard Tumber, CLJJ Director (Journalism) is Professor of Journalism and Communication within the Graduate School of Journalism, City University London, and has published widely in the field of the sociology of news and journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Highlights 2019
    ANNUAL HIGHLIGHTS 2018-19 ANNUAL HIGHLIGHTS Click to navigate CONTENTS 1. Highlights of the Year 10. Events and Conferences 18. Student Fellowship Programme 3. Thank You 11. Eleanor Roosevelt Statue Unveiling 20. Bonavero Research 4. Institutional Structure 12. Human Rights Network events 21. Research Seminars and Roundtable Discussions 5. Benefactors 13. Confronting Illiberalism 22. Staff Activities 5. Advisory Council 15. Book Launches 25. Global Reach 6. Founding Principles 16. Price Media Law Moot Court Competition 24. Contact details 7. Staffing 17. Programmes, Community & Student 8. Social Media Enrichment 9. Kofi Annan’s Visit HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR The Bonavero Institute has been a busy place in its second year of operation. The year started with Secretary Hillary Clinton unveiling Penelope Jencks’ magnificent statue of Eleanor Roosevelt in the gardens of Mansfield just outside the Institute. Eleanor Roosevelt was the chairperson of Speakers included Adam Bodnar, the Polish the committee that drafted the Universal Ombud, Nic Dawes, Deputy Executive Director Declaration of Human Rights and guided for Media at Human Rights Watch, Michael Baroness Helena Kennedy QC its adoption by the United Nations General Ignatieff, the Rector of the Central European The Founding Fellow of the Bonavero Institute of Human Assembly in December 1948. She is an University, and Louise Richardson, the Vice- Rights and Principal of Mansfield College (2010-2018). inspirational historical figure: a woman with Chancellor of the University of Oxford. This little formal learning who became a global conference was the first of several important Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, former Principal of leader, striving untiringly with compassion and conferences hosted by the Bonavero Institute Mansfield College, was the driving force behind the commitment to promote and protect human during the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday 5 October Herbert Smith Freehills Exchange House Primrose Street London Ec2a 2Hs 9.30 – 17.30
    MONDAY 5 OCTOBER HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS EXCHANGE HOUSE PRIMROSE STREET LONDON EC2A 2HS 9.30 – 17.30 EARN 6 CPD POINTS SRA/BSB/ILEX Speakers: DAVID ANDERSON QC, TIM BULEY, JAMIE BURTON, SARAH CLARKE, SIMON CREIGHTON, DEBA DAS, TOM DE LA MARE QC, MARIE DEMETRIOU QC, MICHAEL DRURY CMG, MIKE FORDHAM QC, PROF CONOR GEARTY, RICHARD GORDON QC, JOHN HALFORD, RICHARD HERMER QC, PHILLIPPA KAUFMANN QC, ERIC KING, LORD JUSTICE LAWS, ANDREW LIDBETTER, DAVID LOCK QC, JOANNA LUDLAM, NICOLA MACKINTOSH QC (HONS), RAVI MEHTA, TIM OTTY QC, NAINA PATEL, JASVEER RANDHAWA, JENNI RICHARDS QC, ALICE ROSS, TOM SNELLING, MICHAEL SPENCER, IAIN STEELE, KATE STONE, ADAM STRAW, HUGH TOMLINSON QC, HEATHER WILLIAMS QC Programme: TOP CASES OF THE YEAR, PARLIAMENTARY VANDALISM AND NEW HUMAN RIGHTS, INFORMATION PROCESSING AND DISCLOSUE BY PUBLIC AUTHORITIES, SURVEILLANCE AND THE LAW, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LITIGATION AND POLICY, HENRY VIII CLAUSES, THE IMPACT OF TERRORISM POLICY ON FREE SPEECH, EU LAW IN DOMESTIC JUDICIAL REVIEW, PROPORTIONALITY - WHAT LIES BENEATH THE LABEL?, VICTIMS, SUSPECTS AND CONVICTS, CHALLENGING NHS DECISIONS, PUBLIC LAW AND THE REGULATORS, INTERNATIONAL LAW IN DOMESTIC COURTS, SOCIAL SECURITY SALAMI SLICING MORNING SESSION PLENARY CHAIR: JENNI RICHARDS QC, 39 ESSEX STREET CHAMBERS 9.00 COFFEE AND REGISTRATION MORNING BREAKOUT SESSIONS Each session is scheduled to last one hour. 9.30 INTRODUCTION FROM THE CHAIR OF Please choose one of the following THE PUBLIC LAW PROJECT 1. EU law in domestic judicial review • Relying on EU law in domestic proceedings 9.35 OPENING ADDRESS: LORD JUSTICE LAWS • Charter: status and horizontal effect • Securing a reference and interveners 10.00 TOP PUBLIC LAW CASES OF THE YEAR: • Practical points for Luxembourg Naina Patel and Iain Steele, Blackstone Chambers & Joanna Ludlam, Partner, Baker McKenzie LLP Deba Das, Senior Associate, Freshfields, Tom Snelling, Partner, Freshfields & Marie Demetriou QC, Brick Court Chambers 10.45 PARLIAMENTARY VANDALISM AND NEW HUMAN RIGHTS 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveson's Illiberal Legacy
    LEVESON’S ILLIBERAL LEGACY AUTHORS HELEN ANTHONY MIKE HARRIS BREAKING SASHY NATHAN PADRAIG REIDY NEWS FOREWORD BY PROFESSOR TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM UNDER ATTACK , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. WHY IS THE FREE PRESS IMPORTANT? 2. THE LEVESON INQUIRY, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 A background to Leveson: previous inquiries and press complaints bodies 2.2 The Leveson Inquiry’s Limits • Skewed analysis • Participatory blind spots 2.3 Arbitration 2.4 Exemplary Damages 2.5 Police whistleblowers and press contact 2.6 Data Protection 2.7 Online Press 2.8 Public Interest 3. THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – A LEGAL ANALYSIS 3.1 A rushed and unconstitutional regime 3.2 The use of statute to regulate the press 3.3 The Royal Charter and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 • The use of a Royal Charter • Reporting to Parliament • Arbitration • Apologies • Fines 3.4 The Crime and Courts Act 2013 • Freedom of expression • ‘Provided for by law’ • ‘Outrageous’ • ‘Relevant publisher’ • Exemplary damages and proportionality • Punitive costs and the chilling effect • Right to a fair trial • Right to not be discriminated against 3.5 The Press Recognition Panel 4. THE WIDER IMPACT 4.1 Self-regulation: the international norm 4.2 International response 4.3 The international impact on press freedom 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 6. CONCLUSION 3 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY 4 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD BY TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM: RESTORING BRITAIN’S REPUTATION n January 2014 I felt honour bound to participate in a meeting, the very ‘Our liberty cannot existence of which left me saddened be guarded but by the and ashamed.
    [Show full text]
  • From Perception to Recollection: a Spatio-Temporal Mediated Interaction George Themistokleous*
    Studies in Visual Arts and Communication: an international journal Vol 5, No 2 (2018) on-line ISSN 2393 - 1221 From Perception to Recollection: a spatio-temporal mediated interaction George Themistokleous* Abstract This paper will consider how a media installation called the diplorasis, aims at rethinking understandings of the body in space and time. Through the diplorasis there is an attempt to reconsider the scientific view on the human eyes in relation to art historical accounts of the representational image and to revise these from the perspective of philosophical texts on the image and its relation to an embodied and a disembodied perception (Deleuze, Bergson, Merleau-Ponty). Through this mediated visuality, the prosthetic body becomes re-articulated via a re-framing of the relations between perception and recollection. Keywords: visual media, body and space-time, digital stereoscope, media installation, time-image Introduction an-other understanding of the body, the prosthetic body as we interpret it today. This article begins by re-considering linear Diplorasis derives from the Greek diplo and perspectival representation and the divide this orasi, and is translated as doubled sight. assumes between body and space, in The understanding of the cognitive comparison to alternative modes such as functioning of this “other” body begins by re- stereoscopic representation, where this considering the notion of duration through the distinction is absent. In Hubert Damisch’s A diplorasis and in relation to the understanding Theory of /Cloud/ (2002), the cloud, due to its of duration by Henri Bergson in Matter and very nature of being a ‘body without a surface’ Memory (first published in 1896) and by Gilles (2002: 127), provides a useful prompt to re-think Deleuze in Bergsonism (first published in 1968).
    [Show full text]
  • W. G. Hart Legal Workshop 2013
    W G HART LEGAL WORKSHOP 2013 The Constitution of the Public Sphere: the post-Leveson Landscape Venue: Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR Monday 24 June – Tuesday 25 June, 2013 Provisional Programme (please note this programme remains subject to change) Monday 24 June Coffee and reception 0900 Welcome 0930 IALS Director Opening Address 0945-1045 Chair: Professor Eric Barendt, UCL; Speaker: Geoffrey Robertson QC Parallel Panels 1045-1205 Panel 1A Panel 5B Lunch Plenary Session: Media Plurality and Media Influence 1315-1435 Chair: tbc Professor Chris Marsden, University of Sussex; Professor Lorna Woods, City University London Parallel Panels 1435-1555 Panel 1B Panel 2B Coffee Plenary Session: Media, Law and the Judiciary 1610-1730 Chair: tbc (judge) Professor Tom Gibbons, University of Manchester; Professor Leslie Moran, Birkbeck, University of London Workshop Dinner Tuesday 25 June Coffee 0900 Plenary Session: Constraining Journalism? - Newsgathering and Data Protection 0930-1050 Chair: tbc Gill Phillips, Director of Editorial Legal Services, Guardian News and Media Ltd; Philip Coppel QC, Landmark Chambers Parallel Panels 1050-1210 Panel 4 Panel 5A Lunch Plenary Session: Libel and Privacy in the Emerging Regulatory Matrix 1315-1435 Chair: tbc Professor Alastair Mullis, University of East Anglia; Professor Gavin Phillipson, University of Durham Parallel Panels 1435-1555 Panel 2A Panel 3 Coffee Plenary Session: The Future Shape, Operation and Coherence of Media Regulation 1610-1800 Chair: tbc Professor
    [Show full text]