Mr Mark Wood, Chief Executive, ITN and Mr Jonathan Munro, Deputy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mr Mark Wood, Chief Executive, ITN and Mr Jonathan Munro, Deputy WEDNESDAY 4 JULY ________________ Present Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury, B Corbett of Castle Vale, L Eccles of Moulton, B Fowler, L (Chairman) Hastings of Scarisbrick, L Howe of Idlicote, B Inglewood, L Maxton, L McIntosh of Hudnall, B Thornton, B ________________ Witnesses: Mr Mark Wood, Chief Executive, ITN and Mr Jonathan Munro, Deputy Editor, ITV News and Director of News Gathering, examined. Q1 Chairman: I apologise to everyone for the slightly disrupted morning. As you obviously all know Alan Johnston has been released which we are all delighted about but it has had one disappointing effect so far as we are concerned, that Helen Boaden, who would have been giving evidence today for the BBC, is tied up with the effects of the release, liaising with the family and things of that kind and cannot be here. Although we are very disappointed we are obviously delighted that Alan Johnston has been released. There is no question that he is a very brave journalist and we are delighted that he is safe. We now have ITN. Just to introduce what we are doing, this is a new inquiry by the Communications Committee into media ownership and the news. We are looking at issues like how and why have the agendas of news providers changed; how is the way the way that people access the news changing; how has the process of news gathering changed and I suppose the link between this part and the next part of our inquiry is what is the impact of the concentration of media ownership on the balance and diversity of opinion seen in the news. Those are the kinds of areas that we are looking at. Mark Wood and Jonathan Munro, welcome. Perhaps you could just start very briefly by saying what you both do. Mr Wood: Thank you Chairman. Thank you also for the time and attention this Committee is giving to this area which is an important one for us too. Before I do start could I also add our comments about the release of Alan Johnston because we are delighted too and I would like to pay tribute to the BBC for the way they have managed to keep his case in the spotlight over this long period and I think that has helped enormously in ensuring his freedom, so they really deserve credit for the attention they have kept focussed on him. We are all very pleased, particularly organisations like ours who send people into danger quite regularly. I am Chairman and Chief Executive of ITN, in charge of the whole business therefore. Jonathan Munro is Deputy Editor of ITV News and is Head of News Gathering for ITV News, made by ITN. Q2 Chairman: You say you send journalists into danger as well, how do you assess the danger? Obviously you want to have reports from these danger spots, how do you assess the danger to the journalist? Mr Wood: I will say a word and I am sure Jonathan will. I think one of the things that we have done over many years – I know the BBC have done so as well – is to develop a cadre of journalists and camera people who are experienced, who build up their own experience and can therefore make their own assessments on the ground. That is a very important part of it but we constantly have to balance between getting the story and not putting people into unnecessary danger. ITN has a good track record over 50 years of keeping people out of danger but we did lose three people at the start of the Iraq war and that still pains us. We have examined our own processes and procedures since then. We do have a lot of procedures in place to monitor danger levels and to monitor deployment. Jonathan, do you want to add to that? 2 Mr Munro: The first thing to say is that nobody goes into a hostile environment against their will. Everybody who is sent on the staff is there because they want to be there. Everybody is trained to a very high level. There is quite an industry now in training journalists for hostile environments and indeed businessmen and interpreters as well who go into danger zones. All of our staff are put through those courses. They are very good courses; I was on one myself just a couple of weeks ago, they are very well done. We use Foreign Office advice; we contact embassies and high commissions in those parts of the world that we are deploying to. We employ security advisers of our own in some parts of the world. In Baghdad, for example, if we are going in and out of the city (very often the most dangerous part of any assignment is the journey into the place you are trying to get to rather than the work once you get there) we use security advisers for that purpose. In a sense the most important insurance against things going wrong are the eyes and ears of our own people out there. That is why we do tend to prioritise despatching experienced people. Everybody at some stage has to do their first hostile environment so by definition not everybody on every single assignment is experienced but if somebody is going in for the first time they will always go with members of the team who have been in those circumstances before, are wise about the way to behave in there and have an exit strategy which we agree beforehand should they need to leave pretty promptly. Q3 Chairman: Do you have anyone in Gaza yourself? Mr Munro: We do not have anyone based in Gaza. Our correspondent in Jerusalem, Julian Manyon, went to the Gaza border this morning and was actually in Gaza himself about two weeks ago. It is an interesting case study because under the Fatah regime we judged Gaza to be too dangerous to go to, prompted, for obvious reasons, because Alan Johnston had just been abducted. Under the Hamas regime things became rather more orderly for journalists and we did go in to coincide with Mr Johnston’s hundredth day in captivity about two weeks 3 ago. It was a successful assignment. We categorise those as high risks assignments. We use a traffic light system, so that was a red assignment. Every phone call in and out of the zone is logged and minuted. Every GPS coordinate position is minuted. All the information about where they are moving and why they are moving is written down so that we know exactly where people are. When shifts change, for example in the newsroom in London, there is no danger of information falling between the cracks. I have to report that they came out safely. Q4 Chairman: Do you operate what I gather is called a fireman’s system, that you actually have someone like Julian Manyon based in Jerusalem and then you fly him into whatever danger spot is uppermost? Mr Munro: Yes, we have five correspondents permanently based overseas. The nature of news is that they tend to be based in places which can be volatile, the Middle East being an obvious example. We also have a number of experienced correspondents in London who would go to all parts of the world at a moment’s notice if necessary, again taking into account all the safety precautions we would ask beforehand. If, for example, we needed to go to Afghanistan on a facility with the Ministry of Defence that would typically be done from London rather than a foreign bureau. Q5 Chairman: It is a very dangerous business these days being a journalist in some of these places. The prospect of kidnapping is not new but it is much more prevalent than it ever has been in the recent past at any rate. Mr Wood: I would agree with that. I was editor of Reuters for many years and responsible for deployments of a large number of staff around the world and I would say that the job has become much more dangerous in the last five or six years. As you say, kidnapping is in many ways a bigger danger now than the physical danger of being shot. However, there is also an 4 element of journalists and camera crews being targets in many areas in a way that did not happen in the past. Q6 Chairman: In fact it was the opposite in a sense? You wanted the journalists on your side. Mr Wood: Yes, and that degree of respect for the role of the journalist seems to have evaporated in a lot of war zones. Mr Munro: I would totally agree with that. The issue of us being targets now is a very serious issue; it is a very difficult problem to solve. Nobody wants to be in a position where we are not reporting from the world’s trouble spots. It is important for the public interest that the public is informed about what is happening in Gaza, in Afghanistan, in Zimbabwe or wherever else in the world we feel the need to go from time to time. Being targets is a very uncomfortable position to be in and there is no denying that one of the effects of that is that the number of people who wish to go to these places clearly has diminished compared to the numbers five or six years ago who would have gone more readily. Q7 Chairman: I am told that in places like Baghdad, for example, if you go outside the green zone you do your interviews pretty rapidly – ten minutes – and then move on before hostile forces can gather.
Recommended publications
  • Ep Delegation for Relations with the Palestinian
    Delegation for Relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council European Parliament/Palestinian Legislative Council 7th Interparliamentary Meeting East Jerusalem/Ramallah/Gaza/Hebron 29 April -3 May 2007 Report by Mr Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES, Chairman of the Delegation CR\671268EN.doc PE 384.740 EN EN I. Introduction The visit of the EP delegation in Palestine was the first official contact between both sides since November 2005. Due to the situation in the region, several attempts to meet earlier had failed. Following the Hamas victory in the legislative elections in January 2006, the EP delegation insisted to meet with the newly elected government of national unity agreed in Mekka in February 2007. The representation of the Commission did not attend the meetings where Ministers from Hamas and the Prime Minister were present. (This is the reasoning for listing participants at the beginning of each meeting report). One week before travelling to Palestine, the Chair, in a meeting on 25 April 2007 with Deputies from the Knesset, announced that the Delegation wished to meet with members of the new government, including Hamas members. The reaction of the Chair of the Knesset delegation was quite positive. It is worth adding that the Israeli authorities were cooperative during the whole visit, especially at the airport in Tel Aviv and on the Gaza border. II. Meetings Monday 30 April 1. Briefing by ECTAO (European Technical Assistance Office for the West Bank and Gaza Strip) on the humanitarian and political situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Location: ECTAO, Jerusalem, 09h00-10h15 Participants: John Kjaer (ECTAO Representative), Roy Dickinson (Head of Operations), Ana Gallo (Head of the Political Section), Mark Gallagher (Head of Section - Economic and Financial Cooperation), Regis Meritan (Head of Section - Infrastructure, Water, Environment, Agriculture and UNRWA), EP Delegation.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyeless in Gaza 21
    Acram 1/24/04 1:49 AM Page 19 19 Eyeless Michael Ancram: Good to see you. Lots has happened since we last met.1 I guess you have in Gaza been busy, Gaza has been interesting, I’m keen The liberation of Alan to hear what has been going on. How do you Johnston and the think things will go? imprisonment of Gaza Usamah Hamdan: I will start from the Mecca Agreement. At Mecca there were three Daily in the common Prison important points. The first one was on the else enjoyn’d me, National Unity Government; the second point Where I a Prisoner chain’d, covered the reform of the security services and scarce freely draw called for a new security plan for the Palestinian The air imprison’d also, territories, and the third point was on the reform close and damp, of the PLO and the new political arrangements Unwholsom draught … inside the Palestinian political body. That means John Milton, the relations within the PLO itself, the relations Samson Agonistes between the PLO and the Palestinian Authority, the internal Palestinian relations.2 And we [in the Hamas movement] went back to Gaza and within one month there was the formation of the Usamah Hamden National Unity Government. We started talking about security. There was a security plan that Michael Ancram MP was put forward and that was endorsed by the Jonathan Lehrle government and that was then endorsed by Abu Mark Perry Mazen himself as President.3 When we started to apply that [the security plan] on the ground we faced an important problem – which was that the main General in the security service failed to apply and rejected 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Brave New World Service a Unique Opportunity for the Bbc to Bring the World to the UK
    BRAVE NEW WORLD SERVIce A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BBC TO BRING THE WORLD TO THE UK JOHN MCCaRTHY WITH CHARLOTTE JENNER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Value 4 Integration: A Brave New World Service? 8 Conclusion 16 Recommendations 16 INTERVIEWEES Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications, Ishbel Matheson, Director of Media, Save the Children and University of Westminster former East Africa Correspondent, BBC World Service John Baron MP, Member of Foreign Affairs Select Committee Rod McKenzie, Editor, BBC Radio 1 Newsbeat and Charlie Beckett, Director, POLIS BBC 1Xtra News Tom Burke, Director of Global Youth Work, Y Care International Richard Ottaway MP, Chair, Foreign Affairs Select Committee Alistair Burnett, Editor, BBC World Tonight Rita Payne, Chair, Commonwealth Journalists Mary Dejevsky, Columnist and leader writer, The Independent Association and former Asia Editor, BBC World and former newsroom subeditor, BBC World Service Marcia Poole, Director of Communications, International Jim Egan, Head of Strategy and Distribution, BBC Global News Labour Organisation (ILO) and former Head of the Phil Harding, Journalist and media consultant and former World Service training department Director of English Networks and News, BBC World Service Stewart Purvis, Professor of Journalism and former Lindsey Hilsum, International Editor, Channel 4 News Chief Executive, ITN Isabel Hilton, Editor of China Dialogue, journalist and broadcaster Tony Quinn, Head of Planning, JWT Mary Hockaday, Head of BBC Newsroom Nick Roseveare, Chief Executive, BOND Peter
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Programme Review
    CHANNEL 4 REVIEW OF 2008 Major Themes in 2008 2008 was a year of dramatic creative renewal for Channel 4. In March, the organisation published Next on 4, a policy document laying out its public service vision for the future. Creative renewal in the schedule was evident even before then, with a raft of new programming in January occupying the space occupied in previous years by Celebrity Big Brother, which was rested. Over the course of the year, a range of authored series and campaigning programmes exemplified Channel 4’s renewed commitment to high-impact programming capable of engaging mass-market audiences, stimulating debate and generating interest in important social, political and cultural issues. However, Channel 4’s ability to fulfil its public service ambitions were curtailed by the downturn in the advertising market towards the end of the year, leading to significant reductions in the programming budget for both 2008 and 2009. In an increasingly competitive environment, Channel 4’s portfolio of channels and services maintained its viewing share at 11.9 per cent. The core channel share fell from 8.7 per cent in 2007 to 8.2 per cent in 2008. Next on 4 Dramatic changes are reshaping the UK broadcasting ecology, as it moves towards a fully digital world. Viewers will have access to dozens, if not hundreds of channels, as well as the rapidly growing variety of video services delivered online. In this context, Channel 4 reaffirmed its commitment in Next on 4 to remain a publicly-owned public service broadcaster whose primary purpose is the fulfilment of its legislative remit.
    [Show full text]
  • Television Journalism Awards
    T E L E V I S I O N J O U R N A L I S M A W A R D S Camera Operator of the Year Mehran Bozorgnia - Channel 4 News ITN for Channel 4 Darren Conway - BBC Ten O'clock News/BBC Six O'clock News BBC News for BBC One Arnold Temple - Africa Journal Reuters Television Current Affairs - Home The Drug Trial That Went Wrong - Dispatches In Focus Productions for Channel 4 Exposed - The Bail Hostel Scandal - Panorama BBC Current Affairs for BBC One Prescription for Danger - Tonight with Trevor McDonald ITV Productions for ITV1 Current Affairs - International Iraq - The Death Squads Quicksilver Media Productions for Channel 4 Iraq's Missing Billions - Dispatches Guardian Films for Channel 4 Killer's Paradise - This World BBC Current Affairs for BBC Two Innovation and Multimedia Live Court Stenography Sky News Justin Rowlatt - Newsnight's 'Ethical Man' BBC News for BBC Two War Torn - Stories of Separation - Dispatches David Modell Productions for Channel 4 Nations and Regions Current Affairs Award Facing The Past - Spotlight BBC Northern Ireland Parking - Inside Out (BBC North East and Cumbria) BBC Newcastle Stammer - Inside Out East BBC East Nations and Regions News Coverage Award Aberfan - BBC Wales Today BBC Wales The Morecambe Bay Cockling Tragedy - A Special Edition of Granada Reports ITV Granada Scotland Today STV News - Home Assisted Suicide - BBC Ten O'clock News BBC News for BBC One Drugs - BBC Six O'clock News BBC News for BBC One Selly Oak - A Soldier's Story - ITV Evening News ITN for ITV News News - International Afghanistan Patrol - BBC
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians Weekly Report
    U N I T E D N A T I O N S N A T I O N S U N I E S OCHA Weekly Report: 4 – 10 July 2007 | 1 OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians Weekly Report 4 – 10 July 2007 Of note this week Gaza Strip: • The IDF killed 11 Palestinians, injured 15, and arrested 70 during its incursion into the area southeast of Al Bureij Camp (Central Gaza). In addition, three Palestinians were injured, including a 15-year-old boy, during IDF military operations southeast of Beit Hanoun. • A total of 23 Qassam rockets and 33 mortar shells were fired from Gaza towards Israel, of which at least four rockets and 29 mortar shells targeted Kerem Shalom crossing. Five rockets landed in the Palestinian area. Hamas and Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility. No injuries were reported. • The Palestinian Ministry of Health confirmed that it has returned at least 25 corpses to Gaza via Kerem Shalom since the closure of Rafah until 5 July. In all cases, the persons had passed away in Egyptian or other overseas hospitals and not at the border. • Senior Palestinian traders were able to cross Erez crossing this week for the first time since 12 June. Humanitarian assistance continues to enter Gaza through Kerem Shalom and Sufa. Critical medical cases with special coordination arrangements exited through Erez. Karni was open on two days for the crossing of wheat and wheat grain.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2011 Bulletin Issue 104
    Working for Quality and Diversity in Broadcasting Spring 2011 Bulletin Issue 104 VLV’s 28th Spring Conference AN EVENING WITH Tuesday 12 April 2011 GWYNETH WILLIAMS, Controller, BBC Radio 4 and Radio 4 Extra Risking Quality in Times of Change – Wednesday 18 May 2011 What future for Public Service Broadcasting? Fleming Room, The Royal College of Pathologists, 2 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AF 6.00 for 6.30 pm 10.30am - 3.45pm Geological Society, Burlington House, London W1 VLV is delighted The conference will provide an opportunity for VLV members that Gwyneth to hear and question key BBC executives and opinion formers Williams has on a range of current issues including the future of BBC News agreed to meet and journalism, the World Service and the BBC’s radio members in May to services. How will the BBC decide its priorities following the talk about her new demands recently placed on it - and at the same time networks. This is especially cope with the cuts in its funding? The conference will also opportune after the issues raised by look ahead to the Green Paper this summer prior to a new the BBC Trust’s review, published in Communications Bill in 2012. February 2011, where concerns were expressed about the future The keynote speaker will be Helen Boaden, audiences for Radio 4. The Trust Director, BBC News. Stewart Purvis, Professor said that Radio 4 should aim to of Journalism at City University, will be in the broaden its appeal amongst different chair. Helen Boaden has been Director, BBC demographic groups, such as those News since 2004 and will shortly become a outside of London and the South member of the BBC’s Executive Board.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document 4.7.2007 B6-0272/2007 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure by Brian Crowley, Cristiana Muscardini, Roberta Angelilli, Inese Vaidere, Guntars Krasts, Adam Bielan, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Ryszard Czarnecki and Michał Tomasz Kamiński on behalf of the UEN Group on Palestine RE\675668EN.doc PE 391.152v01-00 EN EN B6-0272/2007 European Parliament resolution on Palestine The European Parliament, – having regard to its previous resolutions on the Middle East, in particular that of 7 September 2006 on the situation in the Middle East, – having regard to its resolution of 25 April 2007 on the case of the BBC journalist Alan Johnston, – having regard to UN Security Council Resolutions 1757 (2007), 1748(2007), 1747(2007), 1701(2006), 1559(2004), 520(1982), 426(1978), 338(1973) and 242(1967), – having regard to the address of the President of the European Parliament to the Israeli Knesset on 30 May 2007 – having regard to the Neighbourhood Agreements between the EU and Israel and the EU and Palestine, – having regard to the conclusions of the 19th Arab League Summit in Riyadh from 29 March 2007, – having regard to Rule 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas the escalating conflict between Israel and Palestine continues to have a negative impact on the situation in the whole of the Middle East, B. whereas BBC journalist Alan Johnston, who was abducted on 12 March 2007 in Gaza, has been released by Hamas, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Launching a New Initiative, Slow News
    Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy June 2017 In Search of Unbiased Reporting in Light of Brexit, Trump and Other Reporting Challenges in the UK and US By Helen Boaden Joan Shorenstein Fellow, Spring 2017 Former BBC News and BBC Radio Director Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Words and Meanings 5 3. The Influence of Money 7 4. The Influence of Politics 9 5. How the Pressure of the News Cycle Drives against the “Knowable Truth” of a Story 11 6. Conclusion 14 7. Acknowledgements 16 8. Endnotes 17 2 “Monogamy is actually more obtainable than news objectivity”1 Digital disruption is changing everything about the news except its professional core. Reporters use the same norms and values now as 100 years ago: objectivity, fairness and balance for the institutional media in the USA, accuracy and impartiality for the BBC. How did these principles emerge? What are their limitations? Do they still help reporters deliver “the best obtainable version of the truth” in a world of growing disinformation? 2 Introduction The BBC’s commitment to impartiality caused an uproar in 2009 when Nick Griffin, widely reviled as leader of the far right British National Party, was invited to appear on its flagship political debate show, Question Time. Politicians and faith leaders weighed in against the BBC, newspapers accused it of a publicity stunt, and the Secretary of State for Wales tried unsuccessfully to get the show pulled. The BBC stood firm. Its director general and editor in chief, Mark Thompson, said the BBC wasn’t in the business of censoring unpalatable views.
    [Show full text]
  • New News, Future News the Challenges for Television News After Digital Switch-Over
    New News, Future News The challenges for television news after Digital Switch-over An Ofcom discussion document Publication date: 26 June 2007 Foreword The prospects for television news in a fully digital era are a central element in any consideration of the future of public service broadcasting (PSB). News is regarded by viewers as the most important of all the PSB genres, and television remains by far the most used source of news for UK citizens. The role of news and information as part of the democratic process is long established, and its status is specifically underpinned in the Communications Act 2003. This report, New News, Future News, is one of a series of Ofcom studies focussing on individual topics identified in the PSB Review of 2004/05, and further discussed in the Digital PSB report of July 2006. The others are on the provision of children’s programmes and on the prospects for a Public Service Publisher. All three studies are linked to areas of particular PSB concern for the future, and set out a framework for policy consideration ahead of the next full PSB review. Other Ofcom work of relevance includes the review of Channel 4’s funding. It has not been the role of this report to come up with solutions, and no policy recommendations are put forward. Instead, the report examines the environment in which television news currently operates, and assesses how that may change in future (after digital switch-over and, in 2014, the expiry of current Channel 3 and Channel 5 licences) . It identifies particular issues that will need to be addressed and suggests some specific questions that may need to be answered.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17
    Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport by command of Her Majesty © BBC Copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as BBC copyright and the document title specified. Photographs are used ©BBC or used under the terms of the PACT agreement except where otherwise identified. Permission from copyright holders must be sought before any photographs are reproduced. You can download this publication from bbc.co.uk/annualreport BBC Pay Disclosures July 2017 Report from the BBC Remuneration Committee of people paid more than £150,000 of licence fee revenue in the financial year 2016/17 1 Senior Executives Since 2009, we have disclosed salaries, expenses, gifts and hospitality for all senior managers in the BBC, who have a full time equivalent salary of £150,000 or more or who sit on a major divisional board. Under the terms of our new Charter, we are now required to publish an annual report for each financial year from the Remuneration Committee with the names of all senior executives of the BBC paid more than £150,000 from licence fee revenue in a financial year. These are set out in this document in bands of £50,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel 4 Statement of Programme Policy 2007
    Channel 4 Statement of Programme Policy 2007 1. Overall strategy Channel 4 faces greater competitive pressures than ever before. Viewers have an ever increasing number of TV channels and can access more and more audiovisual content via the internet and mobile. In this context it is hard for any broadcaster’s programmes to stand out. But Channel 4 faces particular pressures because of its commitment to new programmes and to offering viewers challenging and difficult subject matter. Whatever the pressures, Channel 4 in 2007 intends to buck these competitive trends and to avoid taking the easy option. Channel 4 will offer programmes of contemporary relevance, with a wide range of new titles and series that aim to change people’s lives. It will take risks in subject matter, give a platform to new talent, and be the catalyst for unusual events such as Human Footprint and Exodus from Margate that are more than simply television programmes and are intended to have a lasting impact. The core channel’s budget in 2007 will be £504 million. In line with its remit, Channel 4’s unique public service contribution will span education, diversity and innovation across a range of platforms. In particular, it will strengthen its news and current affairs output and offer strong UK originated drama. Continuing the corporate strategy initially set out in 2004, Channel 4 will extend the values of its remit across the digital channels More4, E4 and Film4 and in its new media services, without diminishing its core channel offer. For the first time, Channel 4’s entire digital TV channel portfolio will be available free-to-air on all digital platforms for the whole year in 2007.
    [Show full text]