The Cybernetics Moment New Studies in American Intellectual and Cultural History Jeffrey Sklansky, Series Editor the Cybernetics Moment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Cybernetics Moment New Studies in American Intellectual and Cultural History Jeffrey Sklansky, Series Editor the Cybernetics Moment The Cybernetics Moment New Studies in American Intellectual and Cultural History Jeffrey Sklansky, Series Editor The Cybernetics Moment Or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age RONALD R. KLINE Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore © 2015 Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2015 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www.press.jhu.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kline, Ronald R., author. The cybernetics moment: or why we call our age the information age / Ronald R. Kline. pages cm. — (New studies in American intellectual and cultural history) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4214-1671-7 (hardcover : acid-free paper) — ISBN 1-4214-1671-9 (hardcover : acid-free paper) — ISBN 978-1-4214-1672-4 (electronic) — ISBN 1-4214-1672-7 (electronic) 1. Information theory. 2. Cybernetics—Social aspects. I. Title. II. Title: Cybernetics moment. III. Title: Why we call our age the information age. Q360.K56 2015 303.48'33—dc23 2014035091 A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Special discounts are available for bulk purchases of this book. For more information, please contact Special Sales at 410-516-6936 or [email protected]. Johns Hopkins University Press uses environmentally friendly book materials, including recycled text paper that is composed of at least 30 percent post-consumer waste, whenever possible. To the memory of Alfred Motz, Margot Ruth Marcotte, Maggie Marcotte Mattke, Raymond Orville Kline, and Nellie Frank Motz Information is information, not matter or energy. No materialism which does not admit this can survive at the present day. Norbert Wiener, Cybernetics, 1948 I think that the past is all that makes the present coherent. James Baldwin, Notes of a Native Son, 1955 contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1 War and Information Theoryâ 9 2 Circular Causality 37 3 The Cybernetics Crazeâ 68 4 The Information Bandwagonâ 102 5 Humans as Machinesâ 135 6 Machines as Humanâ 152 7 Cybernetics in Crisisâ 179 8 Inventing an Information Ageâ 202 9 Two Cybernetic Frontiersâ 229 Abbreviations 245 Notes 249 Index 325 vii This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgments t is my pleasure to acknowledge the many students, colleagues, and I institutions who assisted me during the decade and a half I spent re- searching and writing this book. I especially want to thank Terry Fine and Christina Dunbar-Hester for their advice, assistance, and support over the years. Terry, a professor emer- itus in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at Cornell University, a friend and colleague whose office was down the hall from mine for many years (in my joint appointment between ECE and the Science and Technology Studies Department in the Arts College), helped me understand the basic principles of information theory, discussed the often testy relation- ships between that field and cybernetics during his career, and critiqued my account of the field he loves. As a Ph.D. student in science and technology studies, Christina, now an assistant professor at Rutgers University, served as a sounding board and friendly critic of the ideas in this book when she was at Cornell, particularly when she took my seminar on cybernetics and helped me teach an undergraduate course on the history of information technology. In combing through the massive Warren McCulloch Papers at the American Philosophical Society as a research assistant, Christina deep- ened the research for the book at a critical time. Her comments on several chapters were insightful. I would also like to thank other former students for their research assis- tance: Alec Shuldiner, for finding material on the development of information theory in the extensive AT&T archives; Albert Tu, for copying newspaper and magazine articles on cybernetics and information theory; Lav Varshney, for researching the acceptance of information theory in American electrical engineering journals and for alerting me to obscure published sources on Claude Shannon; and Daniel Kreiss at Stanford University, for gathering material on NASA’s cyborg project at the Ames Research Center. Thanks also to Glen Bugos at NASA, for helping navigate the Ames Research Center archives, and to Rachel Prentice at Cornell and David Hounshell at Carnegie- ix Mellon University, for providing copies of archival material from their own research. Rick Johnson at Cornell and Julian Reitman, a former officer of the IEEE Society on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, shared their recollec- tions of that society in the 1960s and 1970s. The late Dick Neisser, a founder of cognitive psychology, painted a vivid picture for me of information studies in the 1950s. In addition to Terry and Christina, I wish to thank Bill Aspray, Michael Buckland, Peter Dear, Katie King, Daniel Kreiss, Kevin Lambert, Boyd Ray- ward, Eric Schatzberg, Phoebe Sengers, Suman Seth, Fred Turner, Ana Viseu, and Herb Voelcker for commenting on drafts of articles and presentations, and Arisa Ema, Bernard Geogehagen, Marge Kline, Lav Varshney, and Herb Voelcker for commenting on chapters of the book. I also thank audiences for commenting on presentations I gave at Bielefeld University in Germany, Cornell University, the University of Maryland, the University of Pennsylva- nia, Penn State University, Stanford University, the Chemical Heritage Foun- dation, and annual meetings of the Society for the History of Technology. Portions of chapters 6 and 8 appeared in an earlier form as articles in IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Social Studies of Science, and Technol- ogy and Culture. I thank the publishers of those journals for permission to use this material and the editors and anonymous referees for their helpful comments at an early stage of my research. Conversations with colleagues in the Science and Technology Studies De- partment at Cornell helped me strengthen my analytical voice in this book. I appreciated the lively discussions on the history of cybernetics with Cornell graduate students and thank my former student Ph.D. Honghong Tinn for preparing the index. Outside of Cornell, I benefited from correspondence and conversations with Eden Medina, Mara Mills, David Mindell, Jérôme Segal, and Jonathan Sterne. The comments from an anonymous reader for Johns Hopkins University Press helped me to sharpen the argument in several places. Robert J. Brugger at the Press and Beth Gianfagna were exemplary editors. The book could not have been completed without the resources of the Cornell University Library and access to manuscript collections at many institutions. These include the Niels Bohr Library at the American Institute of Physics, the American Philosophical Society, the AT&T Archives and History Center, the College Archives at Imperial College, London, the Uni- versity of Illinois Archives in Urbana, the Library of Congress, the Institute Archives and Special Collections at the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy, and the Rockefeller Archive Center. I thank the librarians at Cornell x Acknowledgments and the archivists in charge of those collections, especially Nora Murphy and Jeff Mifflin at MIT. Generous financial support for research and writing came from the Na- tional Science Foundation, grant SES80689, and the Bovay Program in the History and Ethics of Engineering at Cornell University. Acknowledgments xi This page intentionally left blank The Cybernetics Moment This page intentionally left blank Introduction argaret Mead sat in the front row, waiting for the group photo M to be taken. The most famous woman scientist of her time, an an- thropologist whose books on adolescents in the Pacific Islands spoke to child-raising anxieties in modern America, Mead had attended all of the conferences on humans and machines. Sponsored by the Josiah Macy, Jr., Foundation and held from 1946 to 1953, the postwar meetings aimed to break down disciplinary barriers in the sciences. Mathematicians, engineers, biologists, social scientists, and humanists debated how the wartime theo- ries of communications and control engineering applied to both humans and machines. They discussed, for example, if the new digital computers, which the media had dubbed “electronic brains,” could explain how the human brain worked. After one of the group’s founding members, Norbert Wiener, a mathematician at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pub- lished the surprisingly popular book Cybernetics in 1948, the group ad- opted the term cybernetics as the title of its conference series. The proceedings of the Macy conferences, which Mead coedited, helped to establish the scientific fields of cybernetics and information theory in the United States. During contentious meetings filled with brilliant argu- ments, rambling digressions, and disciplinary posturing, the cybernetics group shaped a language of feedback, control, and information that trans- formed the idiom of the biological and social sciences, sparked the invention of information technologies, and set the intellectual foundation for what came to be called the information age. The premise of cybernetics was a pow- erful analogy: that the principles of information-feedback machines, which explained how a thermostat controlled a household furnace, for example, 1 Figure 1. Meeting of the last Macy Foundation Conference on Cybernetics, Princeton, New Jersey, 1953. The interdisciplinary Macy conferences, held from 1946 to 1953, developed and spread the new science in the United States. Leading lights included anthropologist Margaret Mead and neuroscientist Warren McCulloch (sitting in the front row) and anthropologist Gregory Bateson, mathematician Claude Shannon, and physicist Heinz von Foerster (standing in the back row). From HVFCyb, 10:6. Courtesy of the American Philosophical Society. could also explain how all living things—from the level of the cell to that of society—behaved as they interacted with their environment. The participants waiting with Mead for the group photo to be taken form a who’s who in cybernetics and information theory at the time (fig.
Recommended publications
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 C35 SE 046 420 International
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 266 C35 SE 046 420 TITLE International Cooperation in Science. Science Policy Study--Hearings Volume 7. Hearings before the Task Force on Science Policy of the Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, Ninety-Ninth Congress, First Session (June 18, 19, 20, 27, 1985). No. 50. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. House Committee on Science and Technology. PUB DATE 85 NOTE 1,147p.; Photographs and pages containing small and light print may not reproduce well. For related documents, see SE 046 411-413 and SE 046 419. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (09G) EDRS PRICE MF08/PC46 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Financial Support; Hearings; Higher Education; *International Cooperation; *International Programs; Mathematics; Physics; Policy Formation; *Program Content; Psychology; Research Needs; *Sciences; *Scientific Research; *Technology; Training IDENTIFIERS Congress 99th; *Science Policy; UNESCO ABSTRACT These hearings on international cooperation in science focused on three issues: (1) international cooperation in big science; (2) the impact of international cooperation on research priorities; and (3) coordination in management of international cooperative research. Witnesses presenting testimony and/or prepared statements were: Victor Weisskopf; Sandra D. Toye; Walter A. McDougall; Harold Jaffe; Herbert Friedman; Joseph C. Gavin, Jr.; H. Guyford Stever; Kenneth S. Pedersen; John P. McTague (accompanied by Wallace Kornack); Charles Horner (accompanied by Jack Blanchard); John F. Clarke; Eugene Skolnikoff; and Rans-Otto Wuster. Witnesses' questions and answers are also included. Two appendices are provided. The first is the record of the briefing of the task force staff by the American Association for the Advancement of Science Consortium of Affiliates for International Programs (with these participants: Richard D.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Guyford Stever 1916–2010
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES H. GUYFORD S TEVER 1 9 1 6 – 2 0 1 0 A Biographical Memoir by BY T. K E N N E TH F O W L E R Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2010 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. H. GUYFORD STEVER October 24, 1916–April 9, 2010 BY T. KENNET H FOWLER FTER A DISTINGUISHED CAREER OF SERVICe in academia, govern- Ament, and industry, Guy Stever died on April 9, 2010, at his home in Gaithersburg, Maryland. He was 9. During 1965-1976, he served as president of Carnegie Tech, then Carnegie-Mellon University; director of the National Science Foundation; and science adviser to Presidents Nixon and Ford. He was a member of Section 1 of the National Academy of Sciences, elected in 197, having already been elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 1965. He was awarded the National Medal of Science in 1991. I knew Guy best when I served with him on the Fusion Policy Advisory Committee of 1990, which played an important role in enabling Princeton finally to conduct experiments with tritium that yielded the first definitive demonstration of controlled fusion power, in 199. Guy was chair, a frequent role for him after his years in the White House. Just the year before, in 1989, he had completed a far more difficult assignment as chair of a panel overseeing booster-rocket redesign following the Challenger disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard M. Oliver Oral History Interview
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt658038wn Online items available Bernard M. Oliver Oral History Interview Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California November 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Bernard M. Oliver Oral History SCM0111 1 Interview Overview Call Number: SCM0111 Creator: Oliver, Bernard M., 1916- Title: Bernard M. Oliver oral history interview Dates: 1985-1986 Physical Description: 0.02 Linear feet (1 folder) Summary: Transcript of an interview conducted by Arthur L. Norberg covering Oliver's early life, his education, and work experiences at Bell Laboratories and Hewlett-Packard. Subjects include television research, radar, information theory, organizational climate and objectives at both companies, Hewlett-Packard's associations with Stanford University, and Oliver's association with William Hewlett and David Packard. Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Information about Access Reproduction is prohibited. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Patient Journeys from Healthcare Narratives
    MINING PATIENT JOURNEYS FROM HEALTHCARE NARRATIVES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 2014 By Azad Dehghan School of Computer Science Contents Abstract 14 Declaration 16 Copyright 17 Acknowledgements 18 1 Introduction 23 1.1 Hypotheses and research questions................... 25 1.2 Aim and objectives........................... 26 1.3 Contributions.............................. 27 1.4 Thesis structure............................. 28 2 Background 29 2.1 Text Mining............................... 29 2.1.1 Natural language processing.................. 30 2.1.2 Information extraction..................... 40 2.1.3 Named entity recognition.................... 47 2.1.4 Temporal information extraction................ 54 2.1.5 Temporal entity extraction................... 59 2.1.6 Temporal relation extraction.................. 66 2.2 Clinical Background.......................... 77 2.2.1 Clinical text........................... 77 2.2.2 Computer aided standardisation of clinical care........ 77 2.2.3 Health-related quality of life.................. 78 2.3 Summary................................ 81 2 3 Extraction of Health-related Concepts 83 3.1 Event Extraction............................ 84 3.1.1 Methods............................ 85 3.1.2 Data............................... 89 3.1.3 Experiments, results, and discussion.............. 91 3.2 Health-related Quality of Life Extraction................ 96 3.2.1 HrQoL Schema........................
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Cybernetics Foundations - B
    SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND CYBERNETICS – Vol. III - Existing Cybernetics Foundations - B. M. Vladimirski EXISTING CYBERNETICS FOUNDATIONS B. M. Vladimirski Rostov State University, Russia Keywords: Cybernetics, system, control, black box, entropy, information theory, mathematical modeling, feedback, homeostasis, hierarchy. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Organization 2.1 Systems and Complexity 2.2 Organizability 2.3 Black Box 3. Modeling 4. Information 4.1 Notion of Information 4.2 Generalized Communication System 4.3 Information Theory 4.4 Principle of Necessary Variety 5. Control 5.1 Essence of Control 5.2 Structure and Functions of a Control System 5.3 Feedback and Homeostasis 6. Conclusions Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Cybernetics is a science that studies systems of any nature that are capable of perceiving, storing, and processing information, as well as of using it for control and regulation. UNESCO – EOLSS The second title of the Norbert Wiener’s book “Cybernetics” reads “Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine”. However, it is not recognition of the external similaritySAMPLE between the functions of animalsCHAPTERS and machines that Norbert Wiener is credited with. That had been done well before and can be traced back to La Mettrie and Descartes. Nor is it his contribution that he introduced the notion of feedback; that has been known since the times of the creation of the first irrigation systems in ancient Babylon. His distinctive contribution lies in demonstrating that both animals and machines can be combined into a new, wider class of objects which is characterized by the presence of control systems; furthermore, living organisms, including humans and machines, can be talked about in the same language that is suitable for a description of any teleological (goal-directed) systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Topological Aspects of Biosemiotics
    tripleC 5(2): 49-63, 2007 ISSN 1726-670X http://tripleC.uti.at Topological Aspects of Biosemiotics Rainer E. Zimmermann IAG Philosophische Grundlagenprobleme, U Kassel / Clare Hall, UK – Cambridge / Lehrgebiet Philosophie, FB 13 AW, FH Muenchen, Lothstr. 34, D – 80335 München E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: According to recent work of Bounias and Bonaly cal terms with a view to the biosemiotic consequences. As this (2000), there is a close relationship between the conceptualiza- approach fits naturally into the Kassel programme of investigat- tion of biological life and mathematical conceptualization such ing the relationship between the cognitive perceiving of the that both of them co-depend on each other when discussing world and its communicative modeling (Zimmermann 2004a, preliminary conditions for properties of biosystems. More pre- 2005b), it is found that topology as formal nucleus of spatial cisely, such properties can be realized only, if the space of modeling is more than relevant for the understanding of repre- orbits of members of some topological space X by the set of senting and co-creating the world as it is cognitively perceived functions governing the interactions of these members is com- and communicated in its design. Also, its implications may well pact and complete. This result has important consequences for serve the theoretical (top-down) foundation of biosemiotics the maximization of complementarity in habitat occupation as itself. well as for the reciprocal contributions of sub(eco)systems with respect
    [Show full text]
  • The Social System of Systems Intelligence – a Study Based on Search Engine Method
    In Essays on Systems Intelligence, eds. Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen: pp. 119-133 Espoo: Aalto University, School of Science and Technology, Systems Analysis Laboratory Chapter 5 The Social System of Systems Intelligence – A Study Based on Search Engine Method Kalevi Kilkki This essay offers an preliminary study on systems intelligence as a social system based on four cornerstones: writings using the terminology of systems intelligence, search engines, models to describe the behavior of social phenomena, and a theory of social systems. As a result we provide an illustration of systems intelligence field as a network of key persons. The main conclusion is that the most promising area for systems intelligence as social system is to systematically apply positive psychology to develop organizational management and to solve our everyday problems. Introduction The social system of systems intelligence is an ambitious topic, particularly for a person without any formal studies in sociology. Moreover, systems intelligence is a novel area of science and, hence, the development of its social structures is in early phase. It is even possible to argue that there is not yet any social system of systems intelligence. The approach of this study is based on four cornerstones: first, the literature that has used concept of systems intelligence, second, search engines, third, models to describe the behavior of social phenomena, and forth, a theory of social systems. As a result we may be able to say something novel about the development of systems intelligence as a social system. As to the social systems this essay relies on the grand theory developed by Niklas Luhmann (Luhmann 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Generative Models, Structural Similarity, and Mental Representation
    The Mind as a Predictive Modelling Engine: Generative Models, Structural Similarity, and Mental Representation Daniel George Williams Trinity Hall College University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 The Mind as a Predictive Modelling Engine: Generative Models, Structural Similarity, and Mental Representation Daniel Williams Abstract I outline and defend a theory of mental representation based on three ideas that I extract from the work of the mid-twentieth century philosopher, psychologist, and cybernetician Kenneth Craik: first, an account of mental representation in terms of idealised models that capitalize on structural similarity to their targets; second, an appreciation of prediction as the core function of such models; and third, a regulatory understanding of brain function. I clarify and elaborate on each of these ideas, relate them to contemporary advances in neuroscience and machine learning, and favourably contrast a predictive model-based theory of mental representation with other prominent accounts of the nature, importance, and functions of mental representations in cognitive science and philosophy. For Marcella Montagnese Preface Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Elwood Shannon (1916–2001) Solomon W
    Claude Elwood Shannon (1916–2001) Solomon W. Golomb, Elwyn Berlekamp, Thomas M. Cover, Robert G. Gallager, James L. Massey, and Andrew J. Viterbi Solomon W. Golomb Done in complete isolation from the community of population geneticists, this work went unpublished While his incredibly inventive mind enriched until it appeared in 1993 in Shannon’s Collected many fields, Claude Shannon’s enduring fame will Papers [5], by which time its results were known surely rest on his 1948 work “A mathematical independently and genetics had become a very theory of communication” [7] and the ongoing rev- different subject. After his Ph.D. thesis Shannon olution in information technology it engendered. wrote nothing further about genetics, and he Shannon, born April 30, 1916, in Petoskey, Michi- expressed skepticism about attempts to expand gan, obtained bachelor’s degrees in both mathe- the domain of information theory beyond the matics and electrical engineering at the University communications area for which he created it. of Michigan in 1936. He then went to M.I.T., and Starting in 1938 Shannon worked at M.I.T. with after spending the summer of 1937 at Bell Tele- Vannevar Bush’s “differential analyzer”, the an- phone Laboratories, he wrote one of the greatest cestral analog computer. After another summer master’s theses ever, published in 1938 as “A sym- (1940) at Bell Labs, he spent the academic year bolic analysis of relay and switching circuits” [8], 1940–41 working under the famous mathemati- in which he showed that the symbolic logic of cian Hermann Weyl at the Institute for Advanced George Boole’s nineteenth century Laws of Thought Study in Princeton, where he also began thinking provided the perfect mathematical model for about recasting communications on a proper switching theory (and indeed for the subsequent mathematical foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dictionary of Cybernetics
    Annenberg School for Communication Departmental Papers (ASC) University of Pennsylvania Year 1986 A Dictionary of Cybernetics Klaus Krippendorff University of Pennsylvania, kkrippendorff@asc.upenn.edu This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc papers/224 A DICTIONARY OF CYBERNETICS by Klaus Krippendorff University of Pennsylvania version 2/2/86 A dictionary like the discipline whose terminology it aims to clarify is constantly in flux. It is aided by communal efforts and in turn aids communication within the community of users. Critical comments and suggestions, especially for including new or omitting useless entries, for improving the wording, for references that may need to be added should be directed to: Klaus Krippendorff The Annenberg School of Communications University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 NOTE: This dictionary is not intended to represent the American Society for Cybernetics nor the opinions of any of its members: neither does it replace the current Cybernetics Glossary. Klaus Krippendorff has been kind enough to make his work available to ASC members in order to stimulate discussion on the language of cybernetics. as well as on the idea of a dictionary itself. ABSOLUTE DISCRIMINATION: ->LIMIT OF ABSOLUTE DISCRIMINATION ADAPTATION: STABILITY of success in the face of a changing environment. Two kinds of adaptation are distinguished. (a) Darwinian adaptation after Darwin who observed how organisms change their internal STRUCTURE when their environment makes existing forms no longer viable. E.g., Ashby's HOMEOSTAT searches for a new pattern of behavior as soon as disturbances in its surroundings drive or threaten to drive its essential VARIABLEs outside specified limits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artist's Emergent Journey the Metaphysics of Henri Bergson, and Also Those by Eric Voegelin Against Gnosticism2
    Vol 1 No 2 (Autumn 2020) Online: jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/nexj Visit our WebBlog: newexplorations.net The Artist’s Emergent Journey Clinton Ignatov—The McLuhan Institute—[email protected] To examine computers as a medium in the style of Marshall McLuhan, we must understand the origins of his own perceptions on the nature of media and his deep-seated religious impetus for their development. First we will uncover McLuhan’s reasoning in his description of the artist and the occult origins of his categories of hot and cool media. This will prepare us to recognize these categories when they are reformulated by cyberneticist Norbert Wiener and ethnographer Sherry Turkle. Then, as we consider the roles “black boxes” play in contemporary art and theory, many ways of bringing McLuhan’s insights on space perception and the role of the artist up to date for the work of defining and explaining cyberspace will be demonstrated. Through this work the paradoxical morality of McLuhan’s decision to not make moral value judgments will have been made clear. Introduction In order to bring Marshall McLuhan into the 21st century it is insufficient to retrieve his public persona. This particular character, performed in the ‘60s and ‘70s on the global theater’s world stage, was tailored to the audiences of its time. For our purposes today, we’ve no option but an audacious attempt to retrieve, as best we can, the whole man. To these ends, while examining the media of our time, we will strive to delicately reconstruct the human-scale McLuhan from what has been left in both his public and private written corpus.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Name: RUDOMIN ZEVNOVATY PABLO Born
    CURRICULUM VITAE Name: RUDOMIN ZEVNOVATY PABLO Born: June 15, 1934 Mexico, D.F. Academic degrees: 1956 B.Sc. Biology. National School of Biological Sciences. National Polytechnicum Institute, Mexico. 1963 M.Sc. Physiology. Center of Research and Advanced Studies National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico. 1965 Ph.D. Physiology. Center of Research and Advanced Studies. National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico. Profesional experience: 1953-56 Assistant of Physiology, Laboratory of Neurophysiology, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico 1955-56 Research Associate. Department of Physiology. National Institute of Neumology, Mexico. 1957-59 Investigator, Dept. of Physiology, National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico. 1959-60 John Simon Guggenheim Foundation Fellow at the Rockefeller Institute, N.Y. E.U.A. 1960 Investigator, Marine Biological Institute, Woods Hole. 1960-61 Rockefeller Foundation Fellow. Dept. of Physiology, Institute of Medical Pathology. Siena, Italy. 1961-66 Associate Professor, Dept. of Physiology. Center for Research and Advanced Studies. Mexico 1966-72 Professor, Dept. of Physiology. Center for Research and Advanced Studies. Mexico 1968-69 Visiting Scientist, Laboratory of Neurophysiology and Lab. of Neural Control NINDS. Bethesda, MD 1972-74 Head of the Section of Neural Control. Professor Dept. of Physiology, Center for Research and Advanced Studies. Mexico 1974 Visiting Professor. Hebrew University, Jerusalem. 1976 Visiting Professor. Marine Biomedical Institute. Universidad de Texas Galveston, Tx. E.U.A. 1977 Visiting Professor. Physiolgy Dept. Medical School. Göteborg University. Göteborg, Sweden. 1977 Visiting Professor. Hebrew University. Jerusalem, Israel 1978 Visiting Professor. Marine Biomedical Institute. University of Texas. Galveston, Tex. E.U.A 1980 Visiting Professor. Physiolgy Dept. Medical School. Göteborg University. Göteborg, Sweden. 1983 Visiting Professor. Dept. of Pharmacology and Physiol.
    [Show full text]