Chapter 7 Serrated Projectile Points from Inland Raised Elevation Sites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 7 Serrated Projectile Points from Inland Raised Elevation Sites Chapter 7 Serrated Projectile Points from Inland Raised Elevation Sites in the Greater Victoria Area Morley Eldridge† and Martina Steffen‡ † Millennia Research Limited, Victoria, BC ‡ Royal BC Museum, Victoria, BC Introduction There are no radiocarbon dates earlier than (e.g., Golder Associates 2006). Because a number 3800 BP1 from archaeological sites in the Greater of the points from the summit were similar, and ap- Victoria area, though we must assume that people peared to be types missing or rare in local coastline were occupying the area millennia before this. Lo- excavated assemblages, the authors hypothesized cal sea level history suggests that earlier occupation that the points may date to an earlier time period sites in the area are likely to be either drowned or than is currently recorded archaeologically in the stranded on raised beach terraces. Bifaces recovered Victoria area; a time period after which rising sea from inland locations have some attributes that are levels had inundated any associated coastal habita- rare in bifaces recovered from later period coastline tion sites. Furthermore, projectile points with den- sites. This paper examines the characteristics and ticulate blades are known to date to a moderately typology of serrated and denticulate bifaces in the early period elsewhere in the Pacific Northwest. Victoria area and their geographic characteristics such as spatial distribution and elevation. A regional Victoria Area Sea Level History comparison examines the distribution and age of this trait. We introduce bifaces that have been found The sea level curve has been established for the in association with serrated forms, and several addi- Greater Victoria area. Sea levels at the close of the tional apparently ancient artifacts from raised inland Pleistocene (13,000 BP) were very high, more than locations. No direct dating for the Victoria points 75 metres above present day levels (Hutchinson is available, however, the arguments based on find 1992). Sea levels fell rapidly, however, and lowered locations, sea levels, and stylistic crossdating are, we to present day levels 11,700 radiocarbon years ago believe, compelling. (Mosher and Hewitt 2004), after which sea level During a recent archaeological assessment continued to fall below present day levels. The profile project, an unusual projectile point with denticulate of the floor of Portage Inlet, below Skirt Mountain, blades was recovered while excavating a shovel test shows subaerially weathered glacial tills, overlain by on a small, high-elevation bench near the summit terrestrial peats, which are in turn capped by marine of Skirt Mountain (Eldridge et al. 2006:25). Other deposits (Foster 1972). The peats are as deep as archaeological investigation in the same locality -6.1 metres below present sea level. The weathered had encountered several additional projectile points tills are found up to at least 10 meters depth at Royal Roads (Mathews et al. 1970), and core samples and 1 Uncalibrated radiocarbon date. unconformities in bedding as well as apparent wave- cut terraces off Esquimalt Harbour extend to over served two different methods of manufacturing den- 50 metres below present mean sea level (Mosher ticulate or serrated edge margins. The first is achieved and Hewitt 2004). Mosher and Hewitt suggest the through removal of small pressure flakes from lowest sea level was attained by 9919 ± 60 radiocar- alternate faces along the finished edge margin. This bon years ago. Sea levels around Victoria stabilized produces a slightly wavy edge. Generally, the alternat- at their present position by about 5550 radiocarbon ing bifacial flake removal method seems to produce a years ago (Mosher and Hewitt 2004), although this slightly a less pronounced projection than the second is based on a single date just above present sea level method of manufacture, which is the removal of bifa- on a terrestrial sample. Despite the relatively large cial flakes along both faces originating from the same amount of archaeological work undertaken along point along the edge margin, the depression between the current shoreline in Victoria, no sites dating to denticulate projections. Identification of the method before 3800 BP have ever been radiocarbon dated of manufacture for serration or denticulate blades is (Keddie 2006). The archaeological record is a good not provided in the literature we reviewed. Subse- indication that sea levels may have reached present quently, in the following we use the word denticulate, day elevations only about 3500–4000 BP (Bornhold the second method of manufacture above, where it 2007). Locations just east and west of the city also is present in the RBCM examples and to describe show a possibly small but sudden rise in sea levels a very pronounced tooth edge in some cases within about 2000 years ago (Clague 1989). the literature. We use the term serration, as defined above, to describe the first method of manufacture Human Occupation in the Victoria Area in the RBCM examples and in cases were it was not possible for us to identify the specific manufacturing We must assume that people were living in what is technique. Furthermore, this difference in manufac- now the Victoria area during the middle and early turing technique may have temporal implications. Holocene, even though there has been no radiocar- bon dated archaeological evidence of this. There is Victoria Area Sites and Artifact Descriptions abundant proof that people were elsewhere on the Northwest Coast from the very early through mid- The following sample was composed from the dle Holocene (e.g., Carlson 1979; Carlson 1996a, b; RBCM collections. Included are descriptions of Dixon et al. 1998; Fedje et al. 2004; Gallison each site from which denticulate or serrated, and 1994; Gustafson et al. 1979; Matson 1976b, 1996; several other potentially early-type points, were McLaren 2006; Carlson 1990). The exclusive pres- recovered (Figure 1). All the chipped-stone points ence of late period archaeological evidence in the from each site with denticulate or serrated points are Victoria area probably results from an emphasis on considered. Site elevations are all relative to current archaeological research at or near the current shore- sea level unless specified otherwise (Figure 2), and line. We suggest that several potentially early and sites are discussed in order from highest elevation middle Holocene point forms from the Victoria area to lowest elevation. We have included some artifacts have been retained within the Royal BC Museum that are catalogued with “y” Borden number des- (RBCM) archaeology collections. Specifically, in ignations, which have more general locations than the following we define denticulation and serration those with designated Borden numbers, although as biface attributes that likely occur most frequently in some cases the location is actually quite precise, in periods earlier than 3800 BP. where a block number or a street address is known. Artifact metrics are provided in Table 1. Defining Denticulate and Serrated DcRv–154 In the following we use the terms “denticulate” and “serrated” to describe bifacial tools with tooth-like This isolated find site is located near the summit projections along the blade margin. The terms den- of Skirt Mountain at 325 metres above current sea ticulate and serrated are often used interchangeably level. The biface recovered from the site has den- (Loy and Powell 1977). During examination of the ticulate blades, rounded shoulders, contracting stem, denticulate bifaces in the RBCM collection we ob- and a convex base. The point appears to have been 88 | Eldridge & Steffen Figure 1. Map of the projectile point locations in the Victoria area referenced in the text. Serrated Projectile Points from Inland Raised Elevation Sites in the Greater Victoria Area | 89 Table 1. Descriptive statistics of serrated/denticulate points in the Victoria region. Dimensions in mm. Length Width Thickness Wi/Th Ratio Count (n=) 14 24 24 24 Mean 73 28 9 3.0 Standard Deviation 13 7 2 0.8 Median 71 27 10 2.9 Interquartile 1/4 65 23 8 2.5 Interquartile 3/4 78 32 11 3.9 Minimum 48 13 5 1.7 Maximum 105 47 13 4.3 Figure 2. Three-dimensional map of the Victoria area with the locations of projectile points indicated. reworked from an originally longer form (Figure 3a). DdRu–21 Several additional serrated or denticulate bifaces from the mountain have been found during recent Artifacts from this Saanich site, which is located fieldwork, but have not yet been reported. at the junction of West Saanich and Keating Cross Road at an elevation of 73 metres, include several DcRu–y:82 bifaces (Figure 3b, c, d, g, i). Among them are four denticulate points: a small stemmed point with ser- This distal-medial segment has excurvate serrated rated excurvate blades, rounded shoulders, and a blades (Figure 3e) and was collected near Triangle slightly broken base; a barbed or eared denticulate Mountain at an elevation of 85 metres. point with recurved blades, concave base; and the 90 | Eldridge & Steffen Figure 3. Projectile points recovered from elevations over 60 metres in the Victoria area. a: DcRv–154; b: DdRu–21:4; c: DdRu–21:5; d: DdRu–21:6; e: DcRu–y:82; f: DcRu–y:146; g: DdRu–21:1; h: DdRu–20:1; i: DdRu–21:3; j: DdRu–31:1. end fragment of a denticulate point with subra- thin lanceolate points recovered from the Stave Wa- dial flaking and a thin and lenticular cross-section. tershed (McLaren 2003). The pronounced teeth along Non-denticulate points from the site (Figure 3g, i) the biface blades were produced by the removal of two include two larger points: a medial fragment of a flakes bifacially from the same point at the center of slightly contracting stemmed point with excurvate the depression between denticulate projections. blades, and a complete biface with excurvate blades, irregular base, and subradial flake scars.
Recommended publications
  • The Victoria Harbour Plan Is Very Near Completion
    VICTORIA HARBOUR PLAN CITY OF VICTORIA Adopted by Victoria City Council November 1, 2001 Revised August 30, 2012 VICTORIA HARBOUR PLAN – TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 GEOGRAPHIC CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................. 1 PLAN FORMAT ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROCESS .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 CITY OF VICTORIA PLAN AND POLICY HIERARCHY ................................................................................................... 3 PLAN SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 VICTORIA HARBOUR – GENERAL ISSUES ....................................................................................................... 7 MARINE AND AIR SAFETY ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vlctoria-Esquimalt Coast Defences
    FORT RODD HILL NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA EVOLUTION OF THE VLCTORIA-ESQUIMALT COAST DEFENCES 6-Inch Disappearing Gun 64-Pounder Rifled Muzzle Loader 6-Inch ML 24 Gun INTRODUCTION Although the batteries which formed the coast Canadian Navy, with a secure anchorage from defences of Victoria - Esquimalt were never called which they could sail to provide protection to the upon to repel an enemy, the threat of an attack was entire coast of British Columbia. very real on more than one occasion. At such times, the value of these batteries was never in doubt. There were many changes in the coast defences dur­ Their existence helped to ensure the security of the ing the nearly 80 years of their existence, from 1878 city of Victoria. By protecting the naval base at to 1956. This period saw great political and techno­ Esquimalt, the coast defences provided the war­ logical changes, which had an impact on the way in ships of the Royal Navy, and later the Royal which these gun batteries evolved. Parks Pares Canada Canada Canada 1843 - 1878 During the early colonial period of Vancouver Island's teries should be provided for its defence. In 1859, Rear- history, Victoria, with a population of a few hundred, admiral Baynes, the commander-in-chief of the Pacific was both the centre of commerce and the seat of gov­ Squadron, had recommended the transfer of his head­ ernment for the colony. Founded in 1843 as a quarters to Esquimalt and the placing of shore batteries Hudson's Bay Company post, Victoria was to experi­ to defend the harbour.
    [Show full text]
  • N Quaternary Geological Map of Greater Victoria
    R2R2 C1C1 R1/2R1/2 C2C2 C1C1 R1/2R1/2 53780005378000 C1C1 TT This map and accompanying information are not intended to be used for site T/C3T/C3 C2C2 C2C2 TT R2R2 specific evaluation of properties. Soil and ground conditions in the map area R1/2R1/2 TT R2R2 C2C2 C1C1 C2C2 DurranceDurrance RdRd were interpreted based on borehole data and other information, available prior to C1C1 DurranceDurrance RdRd Geological Survey Branch R2R2TT R2R2 the date of publication and obtained from a variety of sources. Conditions and TaTa HighwayHighwayHighway 17 17 17 C1C1 HighwayHighwayHighway 17 17 17 C1C1 R1/2R1/2 R1/2R1/2 HighwayHighwayHighway 17 17 17 R1/2R1/2 C3C3 R2R2 N Geoscience Map 2000-2, interpretations are subject to change with time as the quantity and quality of C3C3 C1C1 O1O1 available data improves. The authors and the Ministry of Energy and Mines are R2aR2a TaTa R2R2 TT TaTa O2O2 TT R2R2 R1/2R1/2 R1/2R1/2 not liable for any claims or actions arising from the use or interpretation of this ✚ ✚ R1/2R1/2 R2R2C1C1 ✚ data and do not warrant its accuracy and reliability. R2R2 R1/2R1/2C1C1 R1/2R1/2 TT R1/2R1/2 C1C1 R2R2 ✚ C1C1 T/C3T/C3 53770005377000 C1C1 O2O2 R2R2 ✚ C2C2 T/C3T/C3 O1O1 QUATERNARY GEOLOGICAL MAP OF GREATER VICTORIA O1O1 WallaceWallace DrDr R1R1 ✚ R2aR2a R2R2 O2O2 R2R2 R2aR2a O2O2 R2R2 C1C1 R2R2 R2R2 R1/2R1/2 R1/2R1/2 R2R2 C1C1 TRIM SHEETS (92B.043, 044, 053 & 054) C2C2 ✚ O2O2 C2C2 R2R2 ✚ ✚ O1O1 ✚ R1/2R1/2 O1O1 R2R2 R1/2R1/2 O2O2 R2R2 O2O2 R1/2R1/2 ✚ 1 2 O2O2 ✚ Patrick A.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Operations and Emergency Services Branch Canadian Forces Base Esquimalt PO Box 17000 Stn Forces Victoria BC V9A 7N2
    Port Operations and Emergency Services Branch Canadian Forces Base Esquimalt PO Box 17000 Stn Forces Victoria BC V9A 7N2 0103F-l 150-l (POESB/RDIMS 752331 ) clb January 2018 Distribution List MINUTES - ESQUIMALT HARBOUR ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING HELD AT 1330 HOURS ON THURSDAY, 30 NOVEMBER 2017 AT THE CANADIAN FORCES SAILING ASSOCIATION CLUBHOUSE, ESQUIMALT Chairperson: Commander Gregory Walker - DND, Queen's Harbour Master Members Present: Mr. John Sanderson - Board Member, Victoria Esquimalt Harbour Society Ms. Michelle Holmes - Assistant Support Technician, Fort Rodd Hill, Fisgard Lighthouse National Historic Site Mr. Ron Mattson - Councillor, Town of View Royal Lieutenant-Commander Christopher Maier - Commodore, Canadian Forces Sailing Association (CFSA) Mr. Doug Kimmett - DND, Deputy Queen's Harbour Master Ms. Kathryn Goodyear - Constable, RCMP, South Island Integrated Marine Unit Island District Mr. Stafford Bingham - Director, Esquimalt Graving Dock/Infrastructure Assets Management Mr. Bill Brown - Director of Development Services, Township of Esquimalt Ms. Rachel Speller - DND, Formation Safety and Environment (FSE), Environment Officer Mr. John Stein - Constable, RCMP, South Island Integrated Marine Unit Island District Sub-Lieutenant Leblanc - DND, Military Police Unit (MPU), Esquimalt Sub-Lieutenant Boland - DND, Military Police Unit (MPU), Esquimalt Ms. Jody Watson - Harbours and Watershed Coordinator, Capital Regional District (CRD) Mr. Lyle Fairley - DND, Marine Environmental Emergency Response Officer Ms. Sheila Dooley - DND, Esquimalt Harbour Official Recorder: Ms. Brianna Beaudry - DND, Port Operations and Emergency Services Branch Headquarters, Administrative Assistant Reviewed by: Ms. Sheila Dooley - DND, Esquimalt Harbour Official 1/7 ITEM DISCUSSION ACTION I INTRODUCTION 1. Call to Order. The Queen's Harbour Master, CD R Walker, called the meeting to order at 1335 recognizing the Esquimalt and Songhees Nation for whose land we work, live and play.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the History of Esquimalt
    1. THE HISTORY OF ESQUIMALT Esquimalt has a long and significant history resulting in a legacy of heritage buildings, sites, structures and cultural landscapes. Before the arrival of European settlers there was a First Nations presence, with people of the Coast Salish linguistic group inhabiting the area for approximately 4,000 years. There has long been a village site near Ashe Head on the eastern shore of Esquimalt Harbour and this is where the Esquimalt Band makes its home today. Esquimalt, pronounced Ess-KWY-malt, is an anglicized version of the First Nation’s word “es- whoy-malth,” meaning “the place of gradually shoaling water.” In 1790, the Spanish ship Princesa Real entered Esquimalt Harbour under the command of Lt. Don Manuel Quimper, who named the harbour Puerto de Cordova. In 1843, Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) Chief Factor James Douglas (later Governor of the Crown Colonies of Vancouver Island and British Columbia) visited Esquimalt Harbour with other HBC officials aboard the schooner Cadboro, looking for a suitable location for a new Fort north of the 49th parallel. Although Douglas established the new fort on the shore of Victoria Harbour, he recognized the agricultural potential of the land that is now Esquimalt. When he returned in 1848, Douglas negotiated Land Treaties with local First Nations that allowed the HBC subsidiary, the Puget Sound Agricultural Company, to establish three farms in the Esquimalt area: Viewfield Farm in 1850; and Constance Cove and Craigflower in 1853. Esquimalt possesses one of the finest, natural harbours on the west coast, and this fact was not lost on the Royal Navy, intent on establishing their Pacific Headquarters there.
    [Show full text]
  • Colwood Community Green Map Has Black Turnstone Pakki Chipps-Sawyer, Phd Pakki Chipps-Sawyer, Scia'new Nation (Beecher Bay) (Beecher Nation Bay) Scia'new
    COLGrMAP A Rev2.pdf 4/27/11 5:29:22 PM T Cole Island National Town of View Royal HIstoric Site y k e e r C ghwa i s ' H e o d J lan s x I b È k Department of D Q National Defense City of Langfordream Creek llsxt n Mi 1 F West Shore Parks È 9 m and Recreation { Y A (JDF Recreation Centre, Bear Mountain Arena, b I U JDF 55+ Activity Centre ` w oad È Wale R $ City of Langford 9 Q Royal Colwood eek 9 d Cr 1 Golf Course woo ø m ol David C È Cameron Wildplay School U x Colw ü ood Department of Creek È zU National Defense Military Family 9 Resource Centre q Hatley Park Cemetery ú 9 Pioneer Cemetery F ` T 9 ù T È È m Ô ù A b Herm h ø City of Langford K Williams elly Park È m 8 b Ro ø ad T È zU Colwood È John Stubbs Elementary Hatley Park National ø Memorial È Y U School g T School ad Historic Site and È z C oke Ro Royal Roads University U o T 8 A 1 a o S l m w È o o d 5 3 C Ã r Hatley Park National e e È b h k Historic Site and F C j b zU Royal Roads University È & M Q Colwood Creek Park Y z T K È CM E W Fort Rodd Hill and Hatley Park National v x MY Fisgard Lighthouse Historic Site and CY National Historic Sites b È Royal Roads University CMY H at ley K C re zÇ ek Esquimalt Lagoon È Federal Migratory Ô F È Bird Sanctuary zU T 8 A Ö E B reek ee C J The Coast Collective zÇ z Art Centre at d # a ¬ o P Havenwood Estate R rt v a h City of Langford Wis y K Hatley Park National a w k P ö Historic Site and È r a P F Colwood x l Royal Roads University a i r City Hall o m m e Wishart ø M 8 - s n Elementary a r School U È Coburg Peninsula e Sangster t
    [Show full text]
  • Colwood Jetties Remediation Project Esquimalt Harbour, Esquimalt, B.C
    Colwood Jetties Remediation Project Esquimalt Harbour, Esquimalt, B.C. Project No. R.081525.001, R.081526.001 Colwood Jetties Remediation Project Design Issued for Tender Colwood Jetties Remediation Project 00 01 10 Esquimalt Harbour, Esquimalt, B.C. SPECIFICATION INDEX Project No. R.081525.001, R.081526.001 26 05 20 Low Voltage Wire and Box Connectors 2 26 05 21 Low Voltage Wires and Cables 4 Division 31 EARTHWORK 31 62 19 Timber Piling 13 Division 35 WATERWAY AND MARINE CONSTRUCTION 35 20 23 Remedial Dredging, Barge Dewatering and In-Water Transportation 18 35 20 23.01 Offloading, Material Processing, Upland Transportation, and Disposal 19 35 37 10 Material Placement 13 APPENDIX A – DND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS AND GUIDELINES CFB Esquimalt, 2014. Base Standing Order (BSO) 2-128, Base Smoking Policy. December 2014. Department of National Defence Canada, 2010. 99145-00-003. Allowable Vehicle Loading. D Jetty Load Rating. CFB Esquimalt (Colwood) B.C. Department of National Defence Canada, 2016. Summary of Removed Dredge Material and Encountered UXO at DND A Jetty Cleanup. CFB Esquimalt, B.C. Draft Range Clearance and Unexploded Explosive Ordnance (UXO) Activities Manual B-GL- 381-003/TS-000. Issued on Authority of the Chief of the Defence Staff, Canada. April 12, 2011. Esquimalt Harbour – Practices and Procedures – April 2016 (http://www.navy- marine.forces.gc.ca/en/about/structure-marpac-poesb-practices-procedures.page). Formation Safety and Environment, 2015. CFB Esquimalt Safety and Environment Guide for Contractors. February 2015. Preliminary Job Hazard Analysis Check List (Sample – For Reference Only), August 2011. APPENDIX B – ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Golder (Golder Associates, Ltd.), 2016a.
    [Show full text]
  • Subtidal Survey of the Physical and Biological Features of Esquimalt Lagoon
    SUBTIDAL SURVEY OF THE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF ESQUIMALT LAGOON ND 2 FLOOR, 525 HEAD STREET VICTORIA, B.C. V9A 5S1 TEL: (250) 383-4535 FAX: (250) 383-0103 EMAIL: [email protected] SUBTIDAL SURVEY OF THE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF ESQUIMALT LAGOON REPORT & MAP FOLIO NOVEMBER 2000 Prepared for: Victoria and Esquimalt Harbours Environmental Action Program Capital Regional District 524 Yates St. Victoria, BC V8W 2S6 Prepared by: Archipelago Marine Research Ltd. #200 – 525 Head Street Victoria, BC V9A 5S1 In association with: Coastal and Oceans Resources Inc., Victoria, BC Seaconsult Marine Research Ltd., Vancouver, BC TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................i Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................iv 1.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives and Project Deliverables ...................................................................................2 1.3 Survey Area .......................................................................................................................2 2.0 Methods ..............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2017 Dredging Summit and Expo
    DREDGING SUMMIT & EXPO ’17 PROCEEDINGS AN UPDATE ON THE DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL DEFENCE SEDIMENT REMEDIATION IN ESQUIMALT HARBOUR D. Ormerod1, M. Bodman2, and A. Smith3 ABSTRACT Esquimalt Harbour, located at the south end of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, is the primary Pacific homeport for the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN). The majority of the aquatic lands in the harbour are owned and managed by the Department of National Defence (DND). Addressing environmental risks associated with contaminated sediments in Esquimalt Harbour is a high priority for RCN and DND due to the levels of contamination present and the potential human health and environmental risks of exposure to these sediments. Given that the contamination present is the result of historical activities and sources, Esquimalt Harbour is eligible for the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP) program. The presence of these contaminants and associated risks has also led to Esquimalt Harbour being classified as a Class 1 Contaminated Site (High Priority for Action) under Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO’s) Aquatic Site Classification System. Managing these risks through remediation or other risk management measures supports DND’s environmental stewardship objectives. This paper provides an update on sediment remediation in Esquimalt Harbour. The purpose of the sediment remediation is to reduce the ecological and human health risks associated with the contaminated sediments found in Esquimalt Harbour. The sediment remediation program has prioritized four portions of Esquimalt Harbour for early remedial action and is continuing to develop a larger harbour-wide strategy using both risk management and remedial actions at five other harbour hotspots. The nine sites chosen for remedial action were selected based on a number of factors, including the degree of contamination, recontamination potential, and constraints imposed by the presence of RCN infrastructure (e.g., jetties).
    [Show full text]
  • Fisgard Lighthouse, Colwood, British Columbia
    Heritage Lighthouse Protection Act: Statement of Significance Fisgard Lighthouse, Colwood, British Columbia 1859-1860 (year of construction) (Ref. 2013-LR-168, “Fisgard Lighthouse”) 1 - Description of Historic Place Fisgard Lighthouse, a tapering 56-foot (17 m) cylindrical tower surmounted by a multi-faceted lantern, is built into a rectangular two-storey dwelling with a gable roof. Constructed in 1859-1860 to mark the entrance to Esquimalt Harbour, it was commissioned on November 16, 1860 and automated in 1928. The lighthouse was in continuous operation until 1957, when a fire temporarily halted its use as an aid to navigation. It is located on Fisgard Island, a small island south of Vancouver Island, on the west side of the entrance to Esquimalt Harbour, just north of Juan de Fuca Strait, in British Columbia. There are two related buildings on the site that contribute to the heritage character of the lighthouse: (1) a replica boathouse built in 1978; and (2) a replica storehouse built in the 1960s. 2 - Heritage Value The Fisgard Lighthouse is a heritage lighthouse because of its historical, architectural, and community values. a - Historical values Built 11 years prior to British Columbia’s entry into Confederation, the Fisgard Lighthouse is the first and oldest lighthouse on Canada’s west coast. It illustrates the theme of expansion of the system of marine aids to navigation in Canada, and more specifically the establishment of a permanent coastal navigational aid system in British Columbia. The lighthouse made navigation safer in Juan de Fuca Strait during the early period of development of Vancouver Island and British Columbia as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Defence in British Columbia, 1939-1941: Attitudes and Realities
    Coast Defence in British Columbia, 1939-1941: Attitudes and Realities T. MURRAY HUNTER On the evening of 20 June 1942 the Japanese submarine I-26 shelled the remote lighthouse at Estevan Point on the west coast of Vancouver Island. Lieutenant-Commander M. Yokota's gunners were not very accurate: although they bracketed the lighthouse and broke windows in its tower, they did little damage to the facilities.1 This was the only occa­ sion in either the First or Second World Wars when enemy shells fell on Canadian soil. Nevertheless, at the time of the incident, the attack seemed to justify preparations for coast defence which had been carried out on the Pacific Coast. This paper focuses attention on attitudes and realities governing military preparations in the period beginning with the out­ break of the Second World War and ending with Japan's entry into the conflict on 7 December 1941. The topic is restricted to an examination of the coast defence artillery and its armament; no attempt is made to assess the contributions of other arms and services. Historically, defence of Canada's west coast was linked to imperial strategy and the Royal Navy's need for Esquimalt Harbour as one of the principal British bases in the North Pacific. Beginning in 1862 the Royal Navy and, after 1906, the Canadian authorities, exhibited fluctuating concern in the fortifications of this area.2 Periodic conflicts of British inter­ ests with those of the United States and Russia had repercussions on the local scene. In the opening months of the First World War the activities of Admiral von Spee's German Pacific Squadron and, in particular, the daring exploits of the light cruiser Emden aroused some apprehension on the west coast of Canada, but this soon ended with the elimination of these threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Sailing Directions Pictograph Legend
    Fisheries and Oceans Pêches et Océans Canada Canada Corrected to Monthly Edition No. 02/2021 PAC 200 SECOND EDITION General Information Pacific Coast Sailing Directions Pictograph legend Anchorage Wharf Marina Current Caution Light Radio calling-in point Lifesaving station Pilotage Canadian Coast Guard Search and Rescue Pacific 1-800-567-5111 1-250-413-8933 or Cell #727 Environmental Emergencies Pacific 1-800-889-8852 1-604-666-6011 Boating Safety Infoline 1-604-666-2681 Pacific 1-800-267-6687 National Office Department of Fisheries and Oceans information line 1-613-993-0999 Cover photograph Offshore Fishery and Oceanographic Research Vessel CCGS John P. Tully Patricia Bay, North Saanich, B.C. Photo by: TRG Graphics, Brentwood Bay, B.C. B O O K L E T P A C 2 0 0 Corrected to Monthly Edition No. 02/2021 Sailing Directions General Information Pacific Coast Second Edition 2006 Fisheries and Oceans Canada Users of this publication are requested to forward information regarding newly discovered dangers, changes in aids to navigation, the existence of new shoals or channels, printing errors, or other information that would be useful for the correction of nautical charts and hydrographic publications affecting Canadian waters to: Director General Canadian Hydrographic Service Fisheries and Oceans Canada Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0E6 The Canadian Hydrographic Service produces and distributes Nautical Charts, Sailing Directions, Small Craft Guides, Canadian Tide and Current Tables and the Atlas of Tidal Currents of the navigable waters of Canada. These publications are available from authorized Canadian Hydrographic Service Chart Dealers. Visit the CHS web site for dealer location and related information at: www.charts.gc.ca You can also contact our distribution office: Hydrographic Chart Distribution Office Canadian Hydrographic Service Fisheries and Oceans Canada 200 Kent Street Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1A 0E6 Phone: 613-998-4931 Toll free: 1-866-546-3613 Fax: 613-998-1217 E-mail: [email protected] © Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2006 Catalogue No.
    [Show full text]