DOCSLIB.ORG

The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, EAD, SERRES, SIMMEL, SOMERS, TARDE, TILLY, LUHMANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, MEAD, SERRES, SIMMEL, SOMERS, TARDE, TILLY, LUHMANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, MEAD, SERRES, SIMMEL, SOMERS, TARDE, TILLY, LUHMANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, MEAD, SERRES, SIMMEL, SOMERS, TARDE, TILLY, LUHMANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, MEAD, SERRES, SIMMEL, SOMERS, TARDE, TILLY, LUHMANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, MEAD, SERRES, SIMMEL, SOMERS, TARDE, TILLY, LUHMANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, MEAD, SERRES, SIMMEL, SOMERS, TARDE, TILLY, LUHMANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, BOURDIEU, COLLINS, DELEUZE, LATOUR, MAUSS, MANN, WHITE, CROSSLEY, DÉPELTEAU, DONATI, EMIRBAYER, FUHSE, THE PALGRAVE HANDBOOK OF RELATIONAL SOCIOLOGY Edited by François Dépelteau François Dépelteau Editor The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology Editor François Dépelteau Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario, Canada ISBN 978-3-319-66004-2 ISBN 978-3-319-66005-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017963365 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover design by Jenny Vong Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland CONTENTS Part I General Presentations of Relational Sociology 1 1 Relational Thinking in Sociology: Relevance, Concurrence and Dissonance 3 François Dépelteau 2 The Relation as Magical Operator: Overcoming the Divide Between Relational and Processual Sociology 35 Frédéric Vandenberghe Part II Approaches and Theories Associated with Relational Sociology 59 Section A Pragmatism, Interactions and ‘Assemblages’ 61 3 Sociology of Infinitesimal Difference. Gabriel Tarde’s Heritage 63 Sergio Tonkonoff 4 Pluralism and Relationalism in Social Theory: Lessons from the Tarde–Durkheim Debate 85 David Toews 5 G.H. Mead and Relational Sociology: The Case of Concepts 101 Jean-François Côté xv xvi CONTENTS 6 Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism in Sociological Understanding of Evolving Human Culture 119 Osmo Kivinen and Tero Piiroinen 7 Deleuze and Relational Sociology 143 Peter Lenco 8 Triangular Relations 161 Olli Pyyhtinen 9 Bruno Latour and Relational Sociology 183 Christian Papilloud Section B Social Forms, System Theories and Network Analysis 199 10 Georg Simmel and Relational Sociology 201 Christian Papilloud 11 Georg Simmel’s Concept of Forms of Association as an Analytical Tool for Relational Sociology 217 Natàlia Cantó-Milà 12 Switchings Among Netdoms: The Relational Sociology of Harrison C. White 231 Jorge Fontdevila 13 Relationalism and Social Networks 271 Emily Erikson 14 Is Niklas Luhmann a Relational Sociologist? 289 Jean-Sébastien Guy Section C Power Relations, Inequalities and Conflicts 305 15 Charles Tilly and Relational Sociology 307 Chares Demetriou CONTENTS xvii 16 Mann and Relational Sociology 325 Tõnis Saarts and Peeter Selg 17 Pierre Bourdieu and Relational Sociology 343 Christian Papilloud and Eva-Maria Schultze 18 Relational Sociology and Postcolonial Theory: Sketches of a “Postcolonial Relationalism” 357 Julian Go 19 Shorelines, Seashells, and Seeds: Feminist Epistemologies, Ecological Thinking, and Relational Ontologies 375 Andrea Doucet Part III Main Current Approaches in Relational Sociology 393 20 Beyond the Manifesto: Mustafa Emirbayer and Relational Sociology 395 Lily Liang and Sida Liu 21 Critical Realism as Relational Sociology 413 Douglas V. Porpora 22 An Original Relational Sociology Grounded in Critical Realism 431 Pierpaolo Donati 23 Deconstructing and Reconstructing Social Networks 457 Jan A. Fuhse 24 Networks, Interactions and Relations 481 Nick Crossley 25 From the Concept of ‘Trans-Action’ to a Process-Relational Sociology 499 François Dépelteau xviii CONTENTS Part IV Specific Issues and Concepts in Relational Sociology 521 26 Relational Agency 523 Ian Burkitt 27 Power and Relational Sociology 539 Peeter Selg 28 Relational Radicalization 559 Chares Demetriou and Eitan Y. Alimi 29 The Relational Meaning-Making of Riots: Narrative Logic and Network Performance of the London “Riots” 579 Christian Morgner 30 Music Sociology in Relational Perspective 601 Nick Crossley 31 Relational Sociology: Contributions to Understanding Residential Relocation Decisions in Later Life 621 Sarah Hillcoat-Nallétamby 32 Relations, Organising, Leadership and Education 641 Scott Eacott 33 Marcel Mauss, the Gift and Relational Sociology 663 Christian Papilloud Index 677 CHAPTER 22 An Original Relational Sociology Grounded in Critical Realism Pierpaolo Donati 1 CONTENTS This chapter presents an original version of relational sociology (critical realist relational sociology, or CRRS), developed beginning in 1983, which is also called ‘relational theory of society’. It shares with the other relational sociologies the idea of avoiding both methodological individualism and holism. The main differences reside in the way social relations are defined, the kind of reality that is attributed to them, how they configure social formations, and the ways in which social relations are generated (emergence) and changed (morphogenesis). In particular, this approach is suited to understanding how the morphogenesis of society comes about through social relations, which are the mediators between agency and social structure. The generative mecha- nisms that feed social change lie in the dynamics of the networks of social relations (not simply networks of nodes), which alter the molecular composi- tion constituting structures already in place. The scope of CRRS is threefold. Theoretically, it can orient social research toward unseen and/or immaterial realities (the same relations are intangibles). Empirically, it can show how new social forms/formations are created, transformed, or destroyed depending on different processes of valorization or devalorization of social relations. Finally, it can help us design and implement social policies and welfare services based on networking interventions. P. Donati (*) University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy © The Author(s) 2018 431 F. Dépelteau (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_22 432 P. DONATI 2 THE STARTING POINT AND DEVELOPMENT OF CRRS My relational sociology originated as a sociological approach aimed at overcoming the limits of classical and contemporary sociologies with a more general theory able to include partial points of view and, at the same time, to connect them with one another (Donati 1983). My initial inspiration was the criticism of action sociologies and system sociologies in as much as they are reductive views of social reality. I proposed that such a critique would benefit from the adoption of the category of the social relation as the basic concept that designates the smallest unit of the social fabric and, therefore, of sociological analysis. For me, the social relation is simul- taneously ‘the great unknown’ and the unifying principle of reality, containing within itself a unique and fundamental property: that of connecting (uniting) the elements of the social sphere while at the same time it promotes their dif- ferentiation. It is in this property that we find what I call the enigma‘ ’ of the relation (Donati 2015a), which consists in the fact that it connects diverse terms (or entities) through differentiation processes that are, at the same time, conflictual and integrative. In the historical moment in which I wrote Introduction to Relational Sociology (early 1980s), there certainly existed many proposals for overcoming the opposition between action theories and system theories. A ‘multidimen- sional sociology’ was discussed involving an alternation between
Recommended publications
  • Relational Analysis and the Ethnographic Approach : Constructing Preschool Childhood

    Relational Analysis and the Ethnographic Approach : Constructing Preschool Childhood

    This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Author(s): Raittila, Raija; Vuorisalo, Mari Title: Relational analysis and the ethnographic approach : constructing preschool childhood Year: 2021 Version: Published version Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Rights: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Rights url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Please cite the original version: Raittila, R., & Vuorisalo, M. (2021). Relational analysis and the ethnographic approach : constructing preschool childhood. Ethnography and Education, 16(3), 358-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1872396 Ethnography and Education ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/reae20 Relational analysis and the ethnographic approach: constructing preschool childhood Raija Raittila & Mari Vuorisalo To cite this article: Raija Raittila & Mari Vuorisalo (2021): Relational analysis and the ethnographic approach: constructing preschool childhood, Ethnography and Education, DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2021.1872396 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1872396 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 21 Jan 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 5 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=reae20 ETHNOGRAPHY AND EDUCATION https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1872396 Relational analysis and the ethnographic approach: constructing preschool childhood Raija Raittila and Mari Vuorisalo Department of Education, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This article elaborates the relational ontology in an ethnographic Relational sociology; study.
  • Formalist and Relationalist Theory in Social Network Analysis

    Formalist and Relationalist Theory in Social Network Analysis

    Formalist and Relationalist Theory in Social Network Analysis Emily Erikson Yale University 17 March 2011 Draft Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Peter Bearman, Scott Boorman, Richard Lachmann, David Stark, Nicholas Wilson, the participants of Boston University’s Society, Politics & Culture Workshop, and Yale University’s Comparative Research Workshop for their helpful comments. s Abstract: There is a widespread understanding that social networks are relationalist. In this paper, I suggest an alternative view that relationalism is only one theoretical perspective in network analysis. Relationalism, as currently defined, rejects essentialism, a priori categories, and insists upon the intersubjectivity of experience and meaning, as well as the importance of the content of interactions and their historical setting. Formalism is based on a structuralist interpretation of the theoretical works of Georg Simmel. Simmel based his theory on a Neo-Kantian program of identifying a priori categories of relational types and patterns that operate independently of cultural content or historical setting. Formalism and relationalism are therefore entirely distinct from each other. Yet both are internally consistent theoretical perspectives. The contrast between the two plays out in their approaches to culture, meaning, agency, and generalizability. In this paper, I distinguish the two theoretical strains. 2 Since its inception in the 1930s, social network research has become an increasingly vibrant part of sociology inquiry. The field has grown tremendously over the last few decades: new journals and conferences have been created, programs and concentrations in social network analysis have been created in institutions in both North America and Europe, and large numbers of scholars have been attracted to the field from across a wide disciplinary array, including sociology, anthropology, management sciences, computer science, biology, mathematics, and physics.
  • Review Essays

    Review Essays

    Ó American Sociological Association 2014 DOI: 10.1177/0094306114562200 http://cs.sagepub.com REVIEW ESSAYS Relationalism Emergent EMILY ERIKSON Yale University [email protected] There has been talk of relationalism in soci- ology for decades now. These two volumes, Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Onto- Conceptualizing Relational Sociology and logical and Theoretical Issues, edited by Applying Relational Sociology, make an explic- Francxois Depe´lteau and Christopher it play to capture the heart and soul of the Powell. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave discipline and send it on a relationalist tra- Macmillan, 2013. 240pp. $100.00 cloth. jectory. The attempt raises a series of linked ISBN: 9781137379900. questions: how relationalism should be defined, what is a relationalist agenda, and Applying Relational Sociology: Relations, do these volumes advance that agenda? Networks, and Society, edited by Francxois The term relationalism is itself contested, Depe´lteau and Christopher Powell. even by the authors included in these two Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, volumes. I have already taken a stand on 2013. 229pp. $100.00 cloth. ISBN: 97811 this issue, so I should be clear that the way 37379917. I see it, relationalism is a theoretical per- spective based in pragmatism that eschews Cartesian dualism, substantialism, and in drawing in adherents to relationalism. In essentialism while embracing emergence, fact, reading the volume straight through experience, practice, and creativity. It includes felt at times like being sucked into a vortex: some but not all social network analysts, field in the beginning you are circling at some dis- theorists, actor-network researchers, econom- tance around the central point, but gradually ic sociologists, a number of comparative-his- advance to denser pieces focused more pre- torical researchers, and of course card-carry- cisely around key issues.
  • The Double Bind: the Politics of Racial & Class Inequalities in the Americas

    The Double Bind: the Politics of Racial & Class Inequalities in the Americas

    THE DOUBLE BIND: THE POLITICS OF RACIAL & CLASS INEQUALITIES IN THE AMERICAS Report of the Task Force on Racial and Social Class Inequalities in the Americas Edited by Juliet Hooker and Alvin B. Tillery, Jr. September 2016 American Political Science Association Washington, DC Full report available online at http://www.apsanet.org/inequalities Cover Design: Steven M. Eson Interior Layout: Drew Meadows Copyright ©2016 by the American Political Science Association 1527 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-878147-41-7 (Executive Summary) ISBN 978-1-878147-42-4 (Full Report) Task Force Members Rodney E. Hero, University of California, Berkeley Juliet Hooker, University of Texas, Austin Alvin B. Tillery, Jr., Northwestern University Melina Altamirano, Duke University Keith Banting, Queen’s University Michael C. Dawson, University of Chicago Megan Ming Francis, University of Washington Paul Frymer, Princeton University Zoltan L. Hajnal, University of California, San Diego Mala Htun, University of New Mexico Vincent Hutchings, University of Michigan Michael Jones-Correa, University of Pennsylvania Jane Junn, University of Southern California Taeku Lee, University of California, Berkeley Mara Loveman, University of California, Berkeley Raúl Madrid, University of Texas at Austin Tianna S. Paschel, University of California, Berkeley Paul Pierson, University of California, Berkeley Joe Soss, University of Minnesota Debra Thompson, Northwestern University Guillermo Trejo, University of Notre Dame Jessica L. Trounstine, University of California, Merced Sophia Jordán Wallace, University of Washington Dorian Warren, Roosevelt Institute Vesla Weaver, Yale University Table of Contents Executive Summary The Double Bind: The Politics of Racial and Class Inequalities in the Americas .
  • The Family As a Source of Relational Goods (And Evils) for Itself and for the Community Pierpaolo Donati*

    The Family As a Source of Relational Goods (And Evils) for Itself and for the Community Pierpaolo Donati*

    The Family As a Source of Relational Goods (and Evils) for Itself and for the Community Pierpaolo Donati* Author information * Department of Sociology and Business Law, University of Bologna, Italy. Contact author’s email address * [email protected] Article first published online October 2016 HOW TO CITE Donati, P. (2016). The Family As a Source of Relational Goods (and Evils) for Itself and for the Community. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(3), 149-168. doi: 10.14658/pupj-ijse- 2016-3-8 The family as a source of relational goods (and evils) P. Donati The Family As a Source of Relational Goods (and Evils) for Itself and for the Community Pierpaolo Donati* ______________________________________ Abstract: What qualifies a family as a common good? The worldwide debate about ‘what is’ and ‘what makes the family’, and what are its outcomes in terms of common goods (or evils), needs a clarification. In this paper, the Author claims that only a relational perspective can deal with these issues properly. The common good is not a good of an aggregative type which consists of the sum of the well- being of the individuals belonging to a group or collectivity, but is instead a good of relational type, which consists in sharing the relationships from which derive individual and common goods. We need to draw a distinction between purely aggregative and relationally generative types of family forms. Of course, both of them can produce individual and common evils. It happens when they fail to adopt a relational steering which transforms the bad into the good relationships.
  • The Relationship Between the Individual and Society”: Broadening and Deepening Relational Thinking in Group Analysis

    The Relationship Between the Individual and Society”: Broadening and Deepening Relational Thinking in Group Analysis

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Birkbeck Institutional Research Online BEYOND “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIETY”: BROADENING AND DEEPENING RELATIONAL THINKING IN GROUP ANALYSIS Sasha Roseneil Group Analysis (2013) 46(2), 196-210. Contact details: Professor Sasha Roseneil Department of Psychosocial Studies/ Birkbeck Institute for Social Research Birkbeck, University of London Malet Street London WC1E 7HX [email protected] 1 Beyond “the relationship between the individual and society”: broadening and deepening relational thinking in group analysis Sasha Roseneil Abstract The question of “the relationship between the individual and society” has troubled group analysis since its inception. This paper offers a reading of Foulkes that highlights the emergent, yet evanescent, psychosocial ontology in his writings, and argues for the development of a truly psychosocial group analysis, which moves beyond the individual/society dualism. It argues for a shift towards a language of relationality, and proposes new theoretical resources for such a move from relational sociology, relational psychoanalysis and the “matrixial thinking” of Bracha Ettinger which would broaden and deepen group analytic understandings of relationality. Keywords: individual; society; group analysis; relationality; relational sociology; relational psychoanalysis; Foulkes; psychosocial. Author contact details: Professor Sasha Roseneil, Department of Psychosocial Studies, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX. [email protected] tel: 020 3073 8362 2 Introduction A preoccupation with the troubling question of “the relationship between the individual and society” is one of the distinctive characteristics of group analysis as a psychotherapeutic modality. Both the body of writing that constitutes “group-analytic thinking”, and the training programmes that transmit and reproduce group analysis devote considerable attention to this knotty problem.
  • Soc 915 Ethnography and Theory

    Soc 915 Ethnography and Theory

    Sociology 915: Spring 2012 Professor Mustafa Emirbayer Tuesdays 3-5 PM Office: 8141 Sewell Social Science Classroom: 4314 Sewell Social Science Office Telephone: 262-4419 Office Hours: Thursdays 11 AM E-mail: [email protected] Ethnography and Theory, Ethnography as Theory It is customary to associate sociological ethnography with sociological methodology. Most works of ethnography include methodological appendices (some quite famous in their own right), and ethnography itself is typically defined as a method of sociological inquiry. And yet ethnography is as much about theory as it as about methods. As far back as the era of the original Chicago School of Sociology (1920s-30s), ethnographers were advancing important theoretical ideas and insights, and present-day commentators have argued that Chicago sociology’s very way of doing ethnography itself amounted to a significant theoretical contribution. Today it is more important than ever to ponder the relation of ethnography to theory, since we are witnessing in recent years, among the younger generation of American sociologists, a remarkable upsurge of interest in participant observation-style ethnographic research. What this Course Covers In this seminar, we explore the many linkages between ethnography and theory, surveying along the way a number of classic writings from the Chicago School; later Chicago-influenced ethnographies; important mid-twentieth century works; more recent classics; and a selection of newly published works by up-and-coming ethnographers. We not only read portions of these substantive works, but we also discuss in tandem with them a wide range of theoretical issues and challenges. Along the way, we explore practical questions as well, such as how theoretical reflection might be incorporated into substantive, data-rich ethnographic writing.
  • The Relational Approach in Sociology: a Study of Dependence Studie

    The Relational Approach in Sociology: a Study of Dependence Studie

    Review of Sociology 26(4): 5–28. S The Relational Approach in Sociology: a Study of Dependence STUDIE Bálint Néray [email protected] Manuscript received: 7 July 2016. Modified manuscript received: 21 November 2016. Acceptance of manuscript for publication: 11 December 2016. Abstract: Social relations are often crucial elements of a large variety of social phenomena that social scientists study. However, the formalisation of a relational approach in sociology is relatively incomplete. In this study we draw up an analytical framework within which the aims of empirical research can be formulated and analysed. Our main point of departure is the notion of dependence, which arises through the evolution of relations among individuals, connects them on the meso-level of inquiry, and results in outcomes at the group level. We show that the social mechanisms that are responsible for the evolution of these interpersonal relations can be empirically operationalized within the right methodological framework. Finally, we introduce a longitudinal project and describe a unique data set that is suited to the examination of a wide range of social phenomena in an educational setting. We do this by clarifying key theoretical and methodological concepts in the hope that more empirical research and data collection will be carried out in a relational framework in which individuals and their interpersonal relations are considered to be similarly important. Introduction When it comes to theoretical thinking, and especially to empirical research, the prevailing trend in sociology involves preoccupation with the idea that it is individuals that come first, and the relations among them only afterwards.
  • Transcending Modernity with Relational Thinking

    Transcending Modernity with Relational Thinking

    Transcending Modernity with Relational Thinking This book explores the ways in which social relations are profoundly chang- ing modern society, arguing that, constituting a reality of their own, social relations will ultimately lead to a new form of society: an aftermodern or relational society. Drawing on the thought of Simmel, it extends the idea that society consists essentially of social relations, in order to make sense of the operation of dichotomous forces in society and to examine the emer- gence of a “third” in the morphogenetic processes. Through a realist and critical relational sociology, which allows for the fact that human beings are both internal and external to social relations, and therefore to society, the author shows how we are moving towards a new, trans-modern soci- ety – one that calls into question the guiding ideas of Western modernity, such as the notion of linear progression, that science and technology are the decisive factors of human development, and that culture can entirely sup- plant nature. As such, it will appeal to sociologists, social theorists, econo- mists, political scientists, and social philosophers with interests in relational thought, critical realism, and social transformation. Pierpaolo Donati is Alma Mater Professor (PAM) of Sociology at the Uni- versity of Bologna, Italy. Former President of the Italian Sociological Asso- ciation, he is the author of Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences, co-author of The Relational Subject, and co-editor of Social Science, Philosophy and Theology in Dialogue. Routledge Advances in Sociology 303 COVID-19 Volume I: Global Pandemic, Societal Responses, Ideological Solutions Edited by J.
  • Angela Maria Zocchi ROBERT K

    Angela Maria Zocchi ROBERT K

    1571.14 9-03-2016 10:43 Pagina 1 1571.14 Angela Maria Zocchi ROBERT K. MERTON: UN CONSERVATORE? Sia in Italia, sia negli Stati Uniti, già da diversi anni alcuni studiosi propendono per A.M. Zocchi un’interpretazione non convenzionale della sociologia di Robert K. Merton, che sem- bra però ancora scarsamente recepita dalla comunità scientifica. È come se il socio- ROBERT K. MERTON: logo statunitense fosse rimasto prigioniero di un’associazione di idee che, senza ope- rare alcuna distinzione all’interno del funzionalismo, lo associa automaticamente al conservatorismo: Merton = funzionalismo = conservatorismo. ROBERT K.ROBERT MERTON: UN CONSERVATORE? UN CONSERVATORE Questo volume – articolato su cinque espressioni chiave (sociologia umanistica, fun- ? zionalismo, struttura, narrazione, pluralismo) – propone una diversa chiave di lettu- ra della sociologia di Robert K. Merton rispondendo a una serie di interrogativi che, in ultima analisi, sollecitano una riflessione sulla sociologia e sul suo futuro. Nello stesso tempo, il volume vuole essere anche un riconoscimento a Filippo Bar- bano che ha introdotto la sociologia di Merton in Italia e che, per primo, ha avanza- to la tesi di una “svolta ermeneutica” nella sociologia mertoniana. Prefazione di Vincenzo Cesareo Angela Maria Zocchi insegna Sociologia generale presso la Facoltà di Scienze della Comunicazione dell’Università degli Studi di Teramo. La sua produzione scientifica si caratterizza per la molteplicità degli interessi e, nello stesso tempo, per la costante attenzione nei confronti della teoria sociologica, classi- ca e contemporanea. Per i nostri tipi ha già pubblicato Tra storia e narrazione. L’intenzione interpretativa in Robert K. Merton (1998) e il volume Storicità della libertà: frammenti (2011).
  • Pierpaolo Donati University of Bologna

    Pierpaolo Donati University of Bologna

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305347437 The ‘Relational Subject’ According to a Critical Realist Relational Sociology Article in Journal of Critical Realism · August 2016 DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2016.1166728 CITATIONS READS 7 704 1 author: Pierpaolo Donati University of Bologna 152 PUBLICATIONS 1,183 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Gift as part of the paradigm of philosophy of relation View project relational sociology View project All content following this page was uploaded by Pierpaolo Donati on 15 May 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Journal of Critical Realism ISSN: 1476-7430 (Print) 1572-5138 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjcr20 The ‘Relational Subject’ According to a Critical Realist Relational Sociology Pierpaolo Donati To cite this article: Pierpaolo Donati (2016) The ‘Relational Subject’ According to a Critical Realist Relational Sociology, Journal of Critical Realism, 15:4, 352-375, DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2016.1166728 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1166728 Published online: 15 Jul 2016. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yjcr20 Download by: [Professor Pierpaolo Donati] Date: 15 July 2016, At: 13:13 journal of critical realism,
  • Working-Paper-2017-02.Pdf

    Working-Paper-2017-02.Pdf

    Working Papers Beyond the Manifesto: Mustafa Emirbayer and Relational Sociology Lily Liang University of Wisconsin-Madison Sida Liu University of Toronto UT Sociology Working Paper No. 2017-02 Beyond the Manifesto: Mustafa Emirbayer and Relational Sociology Lily Liang Sida Liu University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Toronto ABSTRACT Mustafa Emirbayer’s “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology” calls for a process-in-time understanding of the unfolding interaction between structure and agency that reproduces and transforms practical action. This chapter seek to situate Emirbayer’s Manifesto essay in his broader intellectual pursuits in the direction of relational sociology. We begin the chapter by outlining the dynamic interplay among structure, culture, and agency on which Emirbayer builds his research agenda for relational sociology. Then we examine the enduring influences of John Dewey and Pierre Bourdieu on Emirbayer’s relational thinking. Finally, we discuss Emirbayer and Desmond’s research agenda for studying the racial order in America as a prototype of Emirbayerian relational sociology in practice. Key words: relational sociology, pragmatism, Emirbayer, Dewey, Bourdieu March 22, 2017 This is the draft version of a forthcoming book chapter in the Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology, edited by François Dépelteau. London: Palgrave Mcmillan. Lily Liang is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison; Sida Liu is Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Toronto and Faculty Fellow at the American Bar Foundation. The authors thank François Dépelteau, Chad Goldberg, and Erik Schneiderhan for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. Please direct correspondence to Lily Liang, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 8128 William H.