Þÿgermany Sostpolitikincrisis:President Putin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Þÿgermany Sostpolitikincrisis:President Putin View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2015-06 þÿGermany s Ostpolitik in crisis: President Putin and Chancellor Merkel amid the Ukraine crisis Braun, Thomas L. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/45819 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS GERMANY’S OSTPOLITIK IN CRISIS: PRESIDENT PUTIN AND CHANCELLOR MERKEL AMID THE UKRAINE CRISIS by Thomas L. Braun June 2015 Thesis Advisor: Michael Tsypkin Co-Advisor: Donald Abenheim Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2015 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS GERMANY’S OSTPOLITIK IN CRISIS: PRESIDENT PUTIN AND CHANCELLOR MERKEL AMID THE UKRAINE CRISIS 6. AUTHOR(S) Thomas L. Braun 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. IRB Protocol number ____N/A____. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) The Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 set off the worst crisis between Russia and the West since the 1980s. In the wake of this event, a reunified Germany has emerged as the key leader to engage Russia on behalf of the West. The Crimean episode shattered the 1975 Helsinki foundation for the peaceful inviolability of Europe’s existing borders. The shock of the Russian intervention in Ukraine and the Crimean annexation destroyed the illusion of the German Ostpolitik since 1969 of perpetual entente with Moscow and challenged the European security order. This study examines historic German-Russian relations and Germany’s foreign policy, with an emphasis on Germany’s Russia Policy and post-1990 Ostpolitik. The evolution of policy from “change through rapprochement” to “change through trade” forms a special focus. Caught between an interest-led Realpolitik and a value-based Moralpolitik, Germany has changed its Russian statecraft since the Crimean annexation. The thesis examines this German policy transformation and presents its implications for Germany’s foreign policy amidst a growing German geopolitical power in Europe. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF international security, international relations, foreign policy, German foreign policy making, history of PAGES German-Russian relations, Ukraine crisis, Germany, Russia, Ostpolitik 197 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UU NSN 7540–01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2–89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239–18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited GERMANY’S OSTPOLITIK IN CRISIS: PRESIDENT PUTIN AND CHANCELLOR MERKEL AMID THE UKRAINE CRISIS Thomas L. Braun Lieutenant Colonel, German Air Force Diploma, University of the German Armed Forces, Hamburg, 2000 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN SECURITY STUDIES (EUROPE AND EURASIA) from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL June 2015 Author: Thomas L. Braun Approved by: Michael Tsypkin, Ph.D. Thesis Advisor Donald Abenheim, Ph.D. Co-Advisor Mohammed M. Hafez, Ph.D. Chair, Department of National Security Affairs iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT The Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 set off the worst crisis between Russia and the West since the 1980s. In the wake of this event, a reunified Germany has emerged as the key leader to engage Russia on behalf of the West. The Crimean episode shattered the 1975 Helsinki foundation for the peaceful inviolability of Europe’s existing borders. The shock of the Russian intervention in Ukraine and the Crimean annexation destroyed the illusion of the German Ostpolitik since 1969 of perpetual entente with Moscow and challenged the European security order. This study examines historic German-Russian relations and Germany’s foreign policy, with an emphasis on Germany’s Russia Policy and post-1990 Ostpolitik. The evolution of policy from “change through rapprochement” to “change through trade” forms a special focus. Caught between an interest-led Realpolitik and a value-based Moralpolitik, Germany has changed its Russian statecraft since the Crimean annexation. The thesis examines this German policy transformation and presents its implications for Germany’s foreign policy amidst a growing German geopolitical power in Europe. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. MAJOR RESEARCH QUESTION................................................................2 B. RELEVANCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TOPIC.............................3 C. HYPOTHESIS..................................................................................................5 D. METHODOLOGY AND RESEARCH DESIGN .........................................7 E. THESIS OVERVIEW .....................................................................................8 II. HISTORY OF GERMAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS ................................................9 A. GERMAN-RUSSIAN RELATIONS BEFORE 1945 .................................10 B. THE COLD WAR AND EMERGENCE OF A NEW OSTPOLITIK .......20 C. RUSSIA AND A REUNIFIED GERMANY ................................................38 III. GERMAN FOREIGN POLICY ...............................................................................57 A. UNDERSTANDING FOREIGN POLICY ..................................................59 1. Essentials on Foreign Policy ..............................................................60 2. Stakeholders of Foreign Policy .........................................................63 3. Power, Interests, and Identity ...........................................................65 B. GOVERNMENTAL DECISION-MAKING IN GERMAN FOREIGN POLICY ..........................................................................................................66 1. Role of the Bundeskanzleramt and Ministerial Authority ..............70 2. The Federal Foreign Office and Primacy of Foreign Affairs ........73 3. Parliament: The Role of German Bundestag and Bundesrat in Foreign Policy .....................................................................................75 4. “German Foreign Policy Is Peace Policy”—Norms, Interests, and Parameters ..................................................................................78 5. Germany’s Russia Policy ...................................................................84 C. CIVIL SOCIETY AND FOREIGN POLICY .............................................91 1. German Civil Society after Reunification ........................................92 2. Think Tanks and Mainstream Media on Foreign Affairs ..............96 3. German-Russian Interests Groups and Their Influence ..............100 IV. CASE STUDY: THE ANNEXATION OF CRIMEA ...........................................103 A. RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY ..................................................................111 1. Major Actors in Russian Foreign Policy: The Dominant Role of the Kremlin and the Siloviki .......................................................112 2. Parameters and Interests of Russian Foreign Policy ....................116 3. Domestic Influence on Foreign Policy in Russia ...........................122 B. EVOLUTION OF EVENTS IN THE UKRAINE CRISIS OF 2014 .......126 C. INTERNATIONAL AND GERMAN REACTIONS TO THE RUSSIAN ANNEXATION OF CRIMEA .................................................135 D. DOES PUTIN’S POWER PLAY PAY OFF? ...........................................142 V. THE END OF GERMANY’S OSTPOLITIK IN 2014? ........................................147 vii A. ROOT CAUSES AND THE EXTENT OF FOREIGN POLICY CHANGE ......................................................................................................151 B. AN END TO “RUSSIA FIRSTER”?..........................................................155 C. DIPLOMACY, SECURITY, AND VALUES ............................................157 VI. RETAINING CREDIBILITY
Recommended publications
  • The Changing Depiction of Prussia in the GDR
    The Changing Depiction of Prussia in the GDR: From Rejection to Selective Commemoration Corinna Munn Department of History Columbia University April 9, 2014 Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Volker Berghahn, for his support and guidance in this project. I also thank my second reader, Hana Worthen, for her careful reading and constructive advice. This paper has also benefited from the work I did under Wolfgang Neugebauer at the Humboldt University of Berlin in the summer semester of 2013, and from the advice of Bärbel Holtz, also of Humboldt University. Table of Contents 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………….1 2. Chronology and Context………………………………………………………….4 3. The Geschichtsbild in the GDR…………………………………………………..8 3.1 What is a Geschichtsbild?..............................................................................8 3.2 The Function of the Geschichtsbild in the GDR……………………………9 4. Prussia’s Changing Role in the Geschichtsbild of the GDR…………………….11 4.1 1945-1951: The Post-War Period………………………………………….11 4.1.1 Historiography and Publications……………………………………11 4.1.2 Public Symbols and Events: The fate of the Berliner Stadtschloss…14 4.1.3 Film: Die blauen Schwerter………………………………………...19 4.2 1951-1973: Building a Socialist Society…………………………………...22 4.2.1 Historiography and Publications……………………………………22 4.2.2 Public Symbols and Events: The Neue Wache and the demolition of Potsdam’s Garnisonkirche…………………………………………..30 4.2.3 Film: Die gestohlene Schlacht………………………………………34 4.3 1973-1989: The Rediscovery of Prussia…………………………………...39 4.3.1 Historiography and Publications……………………………………39 4.3.2 Public Symbols and Events: The restoration of the Lindenforum and the exhibit at Sans Souci……………………………………………42 4.3.3 Film: Sachsens Glanz und Preußens Gloria………………………..45 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberal Governmentality in the Red-Green Era
    Neoliberal Governmentality in the Red-Green Era: Tracing Facets of the Entrepreneurial Self in Three Contemporary German Novels by Myriam Léger A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in German Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © Myriam Léger 2012 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation examines three contemporary German novels and their respective representations of the Red-Green era. It focuses on the discourses to which these novels refer in order to shed light on the consequences and implications of Red-Green politics for the subjectification of individuals during this time. When Gerhard Schröder replaced Helmut Kohl in 1998 as Chancellor of Germany, there was a noticeable shift towards neoliberal policies that has since received much attention in scholarly studies and public-political debates about its impact on Germany’s economy, social security system, political party system, and institutional structure. Taking a new approach to understanding the politics of the Red-Green coalition, I argue that its impact is noticeable not only in the political sphere, but that this impact also permeates all levels of society, in particular concepts of selfhood, and that it has found its way into contemporary literary works. As my particular interest lies in investigating how these literary works process the consequences and implications of Red-Green politics for the subjectification of individuals during this time, the novels I selected situate themselves explicitly within the Red-Green era mostly through references to some of its most well-known labour market measures, namely the Ich-AG, the Mittelstandsoffensive, and employability training programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Detachment Instead of Confrontation: Post-European Russia in Search of Self-Sufficiency
    Detachment Instead of Confrontation: Post-European Russia in Search of Self-Sufficiency Alexei Miller, Fyodor Lukyanov The report was written by Alexei Miller, Professor at European University in St. Petersburg and Central European University in Budapest; Fyodor lukyAnov, Editor-in-Chief of the Russia in Global Affairs magazine and a Research Professor at the National Research University-Higher School of Economics. Alexei Miller, Fyodor Lukyanov Along with all the complexes of a superior nation, Russia has the great inferiority complex of a small country. Joseph Brodsky Less Than One, 1976 “Our eagle, the heritage of Byzantium, is a two-headed one. Of course, eagles with one head are strong and powerful as well, but if you cut off the head of our eagle which is turned to the East, you will not turn him into a one-headed eagle, you will only make him bleed.” Russian Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin, from the speech in the State Duma in support of the construction of the Amur Railway, 1908 This project originated in 2015 when intellectual interaction between Russia and the West was rapidly degrading to mutual accusations and verbal fights over “who is to blame” and “how much more Russia should suffer before it is ready to repent.” We sought to provide a forum for analysts and political practitioners from Russia, Europe, the United States, and China to con- duct a constructive dialogue and ultimately move from producing endless recriminations and claims to discussing the future of Russia’s role in international affairs. Naturally, this also meant discussing the future of the world as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Prussian History, 1830-1947'
    H-German Steinhoff on Dwyer, 'Modern Prussian History, 1830-1947' Review published on Saturday, March 1, 2003 Philip G. Dwyer, ed. Modern Prussian History, 1830-1947. New York: Longman, 2001. xviii + 315 pp. $59.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-582-29271-0. Reviewed by Anthony J. Steinhoff (Department of History, University of Tennessee-Chattanooga) Published on H-German (March, 2003) As German Europe's largest state after 1815 and the driving force behind German unification, Prussia's influence on the course of German history has been considerable. Indeed, Prussia's special position within the Second German Empire (Kaiserreich) established a certain identity between Prussia and Germany, an image that has lingered and powerfully shaped both scholarly and popular understandings of Germany. Yet, as the essays in Modern Prussian History, 1830-1947 argue, this image has not done justice to our appreciation either of the Prussian or the German past. Modern Prussian History is the second volume in a two-part reappraisal of Prussian history edited by Philip Dwyer. Its twelve essays take a topical rather than a comprehensive approach to the period's major phases: monarchy, empire, republic, NS-state. In choosing the themes, Dwyer has Selected topics that not only promote a reappraisal of the relationship between Prussia and Germany but also highlight current research trends. The book begins with two introductory essays. First, Dwyer establishes the framework for the volume, presents its major themes, and summarizes the essays' findings. Then, Stefan Berger discusses the image of Prussia in German historiography. Much of this story is well known to students of German history.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WARP of the SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-Westernism, Russophilia, Traditionalism
    HELSINKI COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN SERBIA studies17 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism... BELGRADE, 2016 THE WARP OF THE SERBIAN IDENTITY Anti-westernism, russophilia, traditionalism… Edition: Studies No. 17 Publisher: Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia www.helsinki.org.rs For the publisher: Sonja Biserko Reviewed by: Prof. Dr. Dubravka Stojanović Prof. Dr. Momir Samardžić Dr Hrvoje Klasić Layout and design: Ivan Hrašovec Printed by: Grafiprof, Belgrade Circulation: 200 ISBN 978-86-7208-203-6 This publication is a part of the project “Serbian Identity in the 21st Century” implemented with the assistance from the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Open Society Foundation – Serbia. CONTENTS Publisher’s Note . 5 TRANSITION AND IDENTITIES JOVAN KOMŠIĆ Democratic Transition And Identities . 11 LATINKA PEROVIĆ Serbian-Russian Historical Analogies . 57 MILAN SUBOTIĆ, A Different Russia: From Serbia’s Perspective . 83 SRĐAN BARIŠIĆ The Role of the Serbian and Russian Orthodox Churches in Shaping Governmental Policies . 105 RUSSIA’S SOFT POWER DR. JELICA KURJAK “Soft Power” in the Service of Foreign Policy Strategy of the Russian Federation . 129 DR MILIVOJ BEŠLIN A “New” History For A New Identity . 139 SONJA BISERKO, SEŠKA STANOJLOVIĆ Russia’s Soft Power Expands . 157 SERBIA, EU, EAST DR BORIS VARGA Belgrade And Kiev Between Brussels And Moscow . 169 DIMITRIJE BOAROV More Politics Than Business . 215 PETAR POPOVIĆ Serbian-Russian Joint Military Exercise . 235 SONJA BISERKO Russia and NATO: A Test of Strength over Montenegro .
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Modern Autonomy Systems
    2 The concepT of poliTical auTonomy Thomas Benedikter The World‘s Modern Autonomy Systems Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy 1 The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems Institute of Minority Rights Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial EURAC Research Autonomy Viale Druso/Drususallee 1 I – 39100 Bolzano/Bozen Bozen/Bolzano, 2009 Email: [email protected] This study was written for the European Academy of A second version of this work is available in German Bolzano/Bozen (EURAC; www.eurac.edu), Institute for language: Minority Rights, in the frame of the project Europe- Thomas Benedikter South Asia Exchange on Supranational (Regional) Autonomien der Welt – Eine Einführung in die Policies and Instruments for the Promotion of Human Regionalautonomien der Welt mit vergleichender Rights and the Management of Minority Issues Analyse, ATHESIA, Bozen 2007 (EURASIA-Net) (FP7). ISBN 978-88-8266-479-4 www.athesiabuch.it The first edition of this publication has been released [email protected] in India in 2007 under the title „The World‘s Working Regional Autonomies“ by ANTHEM PRESS, www. This work is dedicated to my father, Alfons Benedikter anthempress.com (born in 1918), who for most of his life gave his all for C-49 Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019, India autonomy and self-determination in South Tyrol. 75-76 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8HA, UK or PO Box 9779, London SW19 7ZG, UK 244 Madison Ave. #116, New York, NY 10016, USA Edited by Copyright © EURAC 2009 This edition is published in collaboration with the Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group GC 45, Sector 3, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700106, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden Champions: a Review of the Literature & Future Research Avenues
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Schenkenhofer, Julian Working Paper Hidden champions: A review of the literature & future research avenues UO Working Paper Series, No. 06-20 Provided in Cooperation with: University of Augsburg, Chair of Management and Organization Suggested Citation: Schenkenhofer, Julian (2020) : Hidden champions: A review of the literature & future research avenues, UO Working Paper Series, No. 06-20, University of Augsburg, Chair of Management and Organization, Augsburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/222408 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 2020 Working Paper 06-2020 Hidden Champions: A Review of the Literature & Future Research Avenues Substantial efforts have contributed to overcome the scarcity of hidden champions research.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does It Mean to Be a Kin Majority? Analyzing Romanian Identity in Moldova and Russian Identity in Crimea from Below
    Eleanor Knott What does it mean to be a kin majority? Analyzing Romanian identity in Moldova and Russian identity in Crimea from below Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Knott, Eleanor (2015) What does it mean to be a kin majority? Analyzing Romanian identity in Moldova and Russian identity in Crimea from below. Social Science Quarterly, 96 (3). pp. 830- 859. ISSN 0038-4941 DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12193 Reuse of this item is permitted through licensing under the Creative Commons: © 2015 John Wiley and Sons CC BY 4.0 This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63888/ Available in LSE Research Online: Online: November 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. What Does it Mean to Be a Kin Majority? Analyzing Romanian Identity in Moldova and Russian Identity in Crimea from Below∗ Eleanor Knott, London School of Economics and Political Science Objective. This article investigates what kin identification means from a bottom-up perspective in two kin majority cases: Moldova and Crimea. Methods. The article is based on 50 fieldwork interviews conducted in both Moldova and Crimea with everyday social actors (2012–2013). Results. Ethnic homogeneity for kin majorities is more fractured that previously considered. Respondents identified more in terms of assemblages of ethnic, cultural, political, linguistic, and territorial identities than in mutually exclusive census categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Cultural Management: How to Do Business with Germans - a Guide
    Aksana Kavalchuk Cross-Cultural Management: How to Do Business with Germans - A Guide - Deutsche Gesellschaft für InternationaleDeutsche Gesellschaft Zusammenarbeit für (GIZ) GmbH Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40 53113Friedrich-Ebert-Allee Bonn 40 Germany53113 Bonn T +49 228 4460-1227 Germans with Do Business How to - A. Kavalchuk FT +49 228228 4460-1333 4460-0 EF [email protected]+49 228 4460-1766 I www.gc21.de/mpwww.giz.de Contents Contents Foreword 5 Preface 9 1 The German understanding of the professional 16 1.1 Task orientation 16 1.2 Seriousness and trustworthiness 25 1.3 Perfectionism as thoroughness and desire for perfection 27 1.4 Reliability and punctuality 32 1.5 Separation of spheres of life 41 1.6 The German love of order 45 2 Features of the German business communication style 54 3 The first meeting 62 3.1 Greeting and rules of address 62 3.2 Small talk 64 3.3 Dress code 65 3.4 Non-verbal communication 66 3.5 Paraverbal communication 70 3.6 Presentations and speeches 72 4 How Germans negotiate 76 4.1. General approach 76 4.2 Negotiating style 77 4.3 Protocol aspects 81 4.4 Decision-making 83 4.5 The agreement 84 2 Contents 5 The project, German style 86 5.1 The planning phase 86 5.2 Assignment of tasks and the work process 87 5.3 What to do in crisis situations and when problems arise 88 5.4 The role of the Project Manager 90 5.5 Information and communication in a project 92 6 How Germans behave in conflict situations 96 6.1 Perception of conflict 96 6.2 Reactions in conflict situations 97 6.3 Conflict resolution strategies 99 Appendix 105 List of References 105 The German soul reflected in proverbs and sayings 106 German holidays 108 For those who'd like to learn more 110 Internet resources 111 3 Foreword Foreword Germany is a key player in international economic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newport Papers 'The Buildini! of an ;\Nnv in a I)Ernocrac" Mark E. Victorson Colonel, U.S. Army
    , , " � The Newport Papers '. ,'....-" .. - " an a 'The Buildini!j\ , of ;\nnv" in I)ernocrac"1 Mark E. Victorson Colonel, U.S. Army NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT, RHODE ISLAND MISSION IN THE EAST NAVAL WAR COLLEGE Newport, Rhode Island CENTER FOR NAVAL WARFARE STUDIES Newport Paper #7 June 1994 "The NewportPapers" series is a vehicle for distribution of substantial work by members of the Naval War College's teaching and research faculty and students as well as members of the broad international security community. Papers are drawn generally from manuscripts not scheduled for publication either as articles in the Naval War College Review or as books from the Naval War College Pressbut that nonetheless merit extensive distribution. Candidates are considered by an editorial board under the auspices of the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies. The views expressed in The Newport Papers are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Naval War College or the Department of the Navy. Correspondenceconcernin g The Newport Papers should be addressed to the Dean of Naval Warfare Studies. Requests for additional copies or for permanent distribution should be directed to the President, Code 32A, Naval War College, 686 Cushing Road, Newport, Rhode Island 02841-1207. Telephone (401) 841-2236 or DSN 948-2236, and fax (401) 841-3579. Printed in the United States of America Mission in the East The Building of an Army in a Democracy in the New German States Mark E. Victors on Colonel, U.S. Army Contents Acknowledgements . v Introduction . 1 lnnere Fuehrung . 3 The Bundeswehr and the NVA 9 The Turning Point .
    [Show full text]
  • „Islam Does Not Belong to Germany.” a Proxy Debate for an Insecure
    UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Department of Theology Master Programme in Religion in Peace and Conflict Master thesis, 15 credits Spring, 2019 Supervisor: Håkan Bengtsson „Islam does not belong to Germany.” A proxy debate for an insecure national identity? An analysis of a controversial German discourse and its underlying reasons. Submitted by Carlotta Mezger Table of Contents I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………...1 II. Method and Theoretical Framework………...……………………………………..5 III. Key Concepts and Previous Research…………...…………………….…………...7 • Belonging…………………………………………………………………..7 • Imagined Community……………………………………………………...9 • Political Islam…………………………………………………………….10 • German Leitkultur and Heimat…………………………………………...11 • Ian Buruma’s “Murder in Amsterdam”…………………………………..12 IV. History of Migration in Germany 1955 to Present……………………………….14 • The Churches……………………………………………………………..17 • The Basic Law…...……………………………………………………….18 • Emergence of Islam as the Problem……………………………………....19 V. Exploration of National Identity Threat Argument……………………………...22 • Herbert Blumer and Perceived Group Threat...……….…………………22 • Charles Taylor on “Modern Social Imaginaries”……………………….24 • The Indecisiveness of German Debate…………..………………...…….25 • Arjun Appadurai and “The Fear of Small Numbers”…………………...27 VI. Exploration of Cultural Citizenship Argument…………………………………29 • Arjan Reijerse et al. and Cultural Citizenship Representations…………30 • The German Leitkultur……………...…………………………………...32 • Samuel Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations”.……….………………...34 • José Casanova and
    [Show full text]
  • Issues for the US Navy in the Black Sea Region
    CRM D0000572.A2/Final June 2000 Issues for the U.S. Navy in the Black Sea Region: Country Profiles and Recommendations Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Georgia Vladimir Lehovich • Ahmed Hashim CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Center for Naval Analyses 4401 Ford Avenue • Alexandria, Virginia 22302-1498 Tom Hirschfeld, CNA Senior Analyst, reviewed the reports of this project. Special thanks also to Maurine Dahl- berg and Celinda Ledford for their assistance in preparing this report. Copyright CNA Corporation/Scanned October 2002 Approved for distribution: Peter M. Swartz, Director Regional Issues Team Policy Analysis Division This document represents the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of the Navy. CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE For copies of this document call: CNA Document Control and Distribution Section at 703-824-2943. Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 Background.................................................................................................. 1 Approach..................................................................................................... 1 Russia................................................................................................................... 3 Summary...................................................................................................... 3 U.S. policy goals..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]