Outcomes and Findings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Outcomes and Findings Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2014 Website accessibility in Australia and the national transition strategy: Outcomes and findings Vivienne Conway Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the Computer Engineering Commons, and the Science and Technology Studies Commons Recommended Citation Conway, V. (2014). Website accessibility in Australia and the national transition strategy: Outcomes and findings. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1405 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1405 Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 2014 Website accessibility in Australia and the national transition strategy: Outcomes and findings Vivienne Conway Edith Cowan University Recommended Citation Conway, V. (2014). Website accessibility in Australia and the national transition strategy: Outcomes and findings. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1405 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1405 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Edith Cowan University Website Accessibility in Australia and the National Transition Strategy: Outcomes and Findings This thesis is presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Vivienne Conway Principal Supervisor: Dr Justin Brown School of Computer and Security Science Faculty of Health, Engineering and Science Edith Cowan University, Western Australia USE OF THESIS The Use of Thesis statement is not included in this version of the thesis. ABSTRACT In the most recent statistics, published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2012, it was reported that slightly under one in five people stated they had a disability. A further twenty-one percent of the population (4.7 million people) reported that they had a long-term health condition that did not restrict their everyday activities. This total group of people who suffer either a disability or a long-term health condition numbers 8.9 million people, or over thirty-nine percent of the Australian population. Of the people reporting a disability, 3.7 million or eighty-eight percent of that group experienced limitations in the activities of self-care, mobility or communication, or were restricted in their education or employment. (W3C, 2013c) In 2010, the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) reported that an estimated one in five Australians or 3.95 million people experienced long term impairment. Of this figure, 2.6 million, or roughly fifteen percent of the population, of people with long term impairments are under the age of 65. At that time it was stated that eighty-six percent report that they experience a core limitation, which involves their mobility or communication and may restrict either their schooling or employment. (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010; Begbie, 2010) According to these figures, it would appear that the number of people with disabilities that restrict their daily lives has grown in line with population growth. In June 2010,the Australian Government released the Web Accessibility National Transition Strategy (NTS) (Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO), 2010a). This document outlines the plan for the adoption and implementation of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Version 2.0 (W3C, 2008d). This plan provides a strategy for all government websites to conform to WCAG 2.0 Priority Level A by December 2012 and Australian Government sites to WCAG 2.0 Priority Level AA by December 2014. In Australia, the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is responsible for administering the Disability Discrimination Act of 1992 (DDA) (Australian Government, 2013a) In order to assist organisations in complying with the DDA, the AHRC has produced the World Wide Web Access: Disability Discrimination Act Advisory Notes Version 4.0 (Advisory Notes). (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2010). These Advisory Notes reinforce the NTS, but also advise all non-government website holders to ensure their websites are compliant to WCAG 2.0 (W3C, 2008d). New non-government websites must adhere to WCAG 2.0 AA, and existing website owners have until December 31, 2013 to comply with this same level. (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2010) Australians have clearly embraced using the Web as their preferred method of dealing with the various levels of government. It is estimated that there are over 4600 registered domains in the gov.au space, with more than 4.2 million documents. Australians enter the federal government web space through ‘www.australia.gov.au’ which has led the transition to WCAG 2.0 by declaring their site compliant to WCAG 2.0 iii AA, with some elements complying with the AAA level. (Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO), 2009) The purpose of this research was to determine whether such a mandated approach by way of a federal government strategy would accomplish the goal of achieving compliance with WCAG 2.0. In order to accomplish this research goal, a selection of websites from government websites was assessed on a regular basis to observe their accessibility changes during the period of the NTS. In addition, this study included websites from non-government sites in order to observe their accessibility changes and also to compare these results with the government website results. The websites were selected in a targeted sample approach in an attempt to choose websites that would enable comparison of the accessibility results. For instance, the same category of websites from each state was selected including the state library, health, disability services, job search, emergency services and business development. Federal government websites were chosen to reflect these same categories plus additional websites with which it was considered Australians had the most contact, including but not limited to broadcasting, tax, health, and information services. The not-for-profit websites chosen represented those considered most well-known, while those selected for the government-affiliated category included a university from each state plus two utilities. The corporate website category included representatives from large corporations such as banks, airlines, mining companies and major shopping as well as representatives selected from organisations such as telecommunications, travel, public transportation, telecommunications and multimedia. In the local government category, the capital city and next largest city in terms of population was chosen from each state. The selection of websites was done in consultation with academic supervisors, members of the W3C as well as in consultation with staff at the Australian Government Information Management Office. Barriers in achieving compliance with WCAG 2.0 and critical success factors for those organisations which achieved the greatest level of compliance were identified both through the evaluation data and also through the surveys conducted throughout the research. The lack of a unified methodology for testing the websites for accessibility was highlighted as an area which needs to be addressed if the Government is to be able to conduct checks on agencies to monitor their progress toward achieving compliance with these accepted standards. The results of this research demonstrate that very few organisations succeeded in meeting even Level A of WCAG by the deadline of December 31, 2012. It is clear however that the government websites achieved greater compliance scores than non-government. In particular, the federal government websites both started as the most accessible and retained that position to the end of the data collection period. While very few websites in this research were successful in achieving compliance with WCAG 2.0 to even Level A, the NTS was successful in the raising of awareness of the issues and requirements of website accessibility, particularly for government agencies. Conversely, this means that the gap between the accessibility of iv government and non-government websites has widened which is clearly demonstrated by the results of this research. v DECLARATION I certify that the thesis does not, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (i) incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted fora degree or diploma in any institution of higher degree; (ii) contain any material previously
Recommended publications
  • STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA March 10, 2017 Desert/Mountain Educational Service Center 17800 Highway 18 Apple Valley, CA 92307
    CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH AND EDUCATION LINKED PROFESSIONS JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY (CAHELP JPA) STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA March 10, 2017 Desert/Mountain Educational Service Center 17800 Highway 18 Apple Valley, CA 92307 1.0 CALL TO ORDER 1.1 Adoption of Agenda – March 10, 2017 1.2 Adoption of Minutes – February 10, 2017 2.0 COMMITTEE MEMBERS' COMMENTS/REPORTS This is the time during the meeting when the California Association of Health and Education Linked Professions Joint Powers Authority (CAHELP JPA), Desert/Mountain Special Education Local Plan Area (SELPA), Desert/Mountain Charter Special Education Local Plan Area (Charter SELPA), and Desert/Mountain Children’s Center (DMCC) staff is prepared to receive concerns/requests regarding items on this agenda or any school- related special education issues. Discussion will include special education policies and procedures as they relate to district coordination and implementation of the SELPA and Charter SELPA Local Plan. 3.0 DIRECTORS OF EDUCATION REPORTS 3.1 Preschool Assessments & Transition to Kindergarten 4.0 DESERT/MOUNTAIN OPERATIONS AREA DIRECTOR’S REPORTS 4.1 Employee Clearance Requirements for State Preschools & Head Start Programs 5.0 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORTS 5.1 OCR & ADA Compliance Update- Strategic Plan for Web Accessibility 5.2 Significant Disproportionality, DINC, APR Indicator, PIR 5.3 CDE & PPIC Stakeholder Meetings 5.4 AB 1369 Dyslexia Bill Update 5.5 Endrew v. Douglas County Steering Committee Meeting Agenda March 10, 2017 Page 2 of 3 6.0 DIRECTOR’S
    [Show full text]
  • Ux-Rule: a Javascript Framework for Dynamic and Static
    UX-RULE: A JAVASCRIPT FRAMEWORK FOR DYNAMIC AND STATIC ACCESIBILITY TESTING OF WEBPAGES By ERIN S. DUGGAN B.S., New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Masters’ of Science Department of Computer Science 2014 This thesis entitled: ux-rule: A JavaScript Framework for Dynamic and Static Accessibility Testing of Webpages written by Erin S. Duggan has been approved for the Department of Computer Science Tom Yeh Shaun Kane Date___________ The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Duggan, Erin S. (M.S., Computer Science) ux-rule: A JavaScript Framework for Dynamic and Static Accessibility Testing of Webpages Thesis directed by Professors Tom Yeh and Shaun Kane The Internet is designed to disseminate information to the widest group of people possible. In recent years, this group has been expanded to include people with disabilities through the use of a number of tools. In order to support this, websites need to be designed as accessible and require testing to ensure that they are accessible. The ux-rule framework is an automated accessibility testing framework designed for use by website programmers to do both static and dynamic analysis. It establishes a rule syntax for specifying tests that is based on imperative programming language syntax so that rules can be added or modified easily to meet any other requirements in addition to accessibility guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Accessibility Specialist (WAS) – Spezialist Für Web-Barrierefreiheit
    IAAP Web Accessibility Specialist (WAS) – Spezialist für Web-Barrierefreiheit Deutscher Syllabus 2019 Mit-Herausgeber: ● Dr. Paul Bohman, CPWA & Rosemary Musachio,CPWA Beitragende: ● Dr. Paul Bohman, CPWA ● Pina D'Intino, CPACC ● Samantha Evans ● Katie Haritos-Shea, CPWA ● Eric Hind, CPACC ● David McDonald ● Rosmarin Musachio, CPWA ● Radek Pavlíček, CPWA ● Allison Ravenhall ● Paul Rayius ● Damian Sian, CPWA ● Stacy Iannaccone, CPACC Bearbeitet: September 2019 zur Aufnahme der WCAG 2.1 Übersetzung ins Deutsche (Nov-Dez 2020): ● Laura Eppler ● Kira Frankenfeld ● Klaus Höckner, CPACC ● Gottfried Zimmermann, CPWA Inhaltsverzeichnis Inhaltsverzeichnis ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Zweck dieses Dokuments .......................................................................................................................... 1 Ressourcen zur IAAP-Prüfungsvorbereitung ............................................................................................. 1 Über die WAS-Bezeichnung ...................................................................................................................... 2 Zusätzliche Informationen ......................................................................................................................... 2 Die WAS-Prüfungsinhalte auf einen Blick .................................................................................................. 3 I. Erstellung barrierefreier Web-Lösungen (40%
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2019 ICT Accessibility Testing Symposium: Perfecting Traditional Methods, Tackling Emerging Interfaces, and Beyond
    Proceedings of the 2019 ICT Accessibility Testing Symposium: Perfecting Traditional Methods, Tackling Emerging Interfaces, and Beyond Washington DC October 1 & 2, 2019 Partnership for Public Service Conference Center, 1100 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA Organized by Accessibility Track Consulting, LLC www.ictaccessibilitytesting.org Contents Introduction from the Chair .......................................................................................... 1 Keynote: “The Missing Link: Accessibility and Usability Working Together” .................. 3 Workshop: Introduction to Trusted Tester Methods ....................................................... 5 Workshop: Assessing and Authoring Image Descriptions for Digital Learning Products ........................................................................................... 7 Workshop: Mobile Testing Workshop ............................................................................ 9 Workshop: Testing PDFs for Accessibility and Standards Conformance ..................... 11 Workshop: Finding Ways to Make Accessibility Resonate with Your Team: “Inclusive Design is not Rocket Science” ................................................................. 15 Bootcamp Course: Tools for Assessing Organizational Risk for Managers of Accessibility Testing Programs ................................................................................ 17 Bootcamp Course: Accessibility Testing for Beginners .............................................. 21 W3C Accessibility Conformance
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2018 ICT Accessibility Testing Symposium: Mobile Testing, 508 Revision, and Beyond
    Proceedings of the 2018 ICT Accessibility Testing Symposium: Mobile Testing, 508 Revision, and Beyond Arlington, VA, USA November 7 & 8, 2018 George Mason University’s Arlington Campus Organized by Accessibility Track Consulting, LLC www.ictaccessibilitytesting.org Contents Introduction from the Chair ....................................................................................1 Keynote. A Lawyer Goes into an Accessibility Testing Conference… (not a joke!) ......................................................................................................3 Workshop. Accessibility Testing 201 ....................................................................5 Workshop. Mobile Testing Process......................................................................9 Workshop. Vetting before Getting: Considerations for Procuring Accessible Information and Communication Technology ................................................. 11 Workshop. Assembling a Robust Accessibility Toolkit ....................................... 15 Workshop. Understanding ARIA 1.1 and the ARIA Authoring Practices Guide . 19 Competition. Are WordPress themes Accessibility Ready? ............................... 21 Gray-Box Mobile Accessibility Testing ................................................................ 27 Evaluating hardware accessibility ....................................................................... 37 Launching Trusted Tester Version 5.0: Evolution and Improvements in the Trusted Tester Approach to ICT Accessibility ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Supporting Web Developers: Working Practices and Resources for the Creation and Evaluation of Accessible Websites
    Understanding and Supporting Web Developers: Working Practices and Resources for the Creation and Evaluation of Accessible Websites David Mark Swallow Doctor of Philosophy University of York Computer Science November 2017 2 Abstract Web developers have a responsibility to develop websites that are accessible and usable by the broadest range of users, including people with disabilities. Despite numerous initiatives over the last two decades to support, encourage and compel developers to fulfil this responsibility, websites continue to exhibit persistent accessibility problems. This programme of research aimed to better understand the difficulties that developers face and to develop the necessary support for them to successfully integrate accessibility into their existing workflows. The first study systematically reviewed 397 web accessibility evaluation studies published over a 15-year period between 1999 and 2014. This showed a persistent occurrence of accessibility problems that does not appear to be improving. The second study followed a contextual design methodology to investigate the working practices of 13 professional developers. This showed how they are hindered, not by limited awareness or concern, but by a lack of knowledge and practical guidance on how to make websites accessible. To understand the nature of their confusion and uncertainty, the third study interviewed 26 professional developers and attempted to elicit their mental models of web accessibility. Their mental models were found to incorporate some, but not nearly enough, knowledge and awareness of accessibility and were based on a conceptual model that prioritises technical conformance over user experience. These findings were embodied in the design and implementation of an accessibility information resource, called WebAIR.
    [Show full text]
  • Guía De Accesibilidad Web Hearcolors
    Guía de Accesibilidad Web México, D.F. agosto de 2018 Contenido Web Content Accesibility Guidelines 2.0 6 I. Introducción 6 II. Tecnologías de Asistencia 11 III. Estándares internacionales de accesibilidad 32 1. Principio: Perceptible 32 1.1. Pauta: Alternativas textuales 33 1.1.1. Escenario: Contenido no textual 33 1.2. Pauta: Alternativas al contenido basado en el tiempo 60 Video, audio y multimedia 60 1.2.1. Escenario: Solo audio o solo video pregrabado 60 1.2.2. Escenario: Audio pregrabado en multimedia (Leyendas) 63 1.2.3. Escenario: Video pregrabado en multimedia (Transcripción o audiodescripción) 65 1.2.4. Escenario: Audio en vivo en multimedia (Leyendas) 68 1.2.5. Escenario: Video pregrabado en multimedia (Audiodescripción) 71 1.2.6. Escenario: Audio pregrabado en multimedia (Lengua de señas) 71 1.2.7. Escenario: Video pregrabado en multimedia (Audiodescripción extendida) 71 1.2.8. Escenario: Todo el contenido pregrabado en multimedia y solo video pregrabado (Transcripción) 71 1.2.9. Escenario: Solo audio en vivo (Transcripción) 72 1.3. Pauta: Adaptable 73 1.3.1. Escenario: Información y estructura 73 1.4. Pauta: Distinguible 90 1.4.1. Escenario: Uso de colores 90 1.4.2. Escenario: Audio 94 1.4.3. Escenario: Contraste mínimo 95 1.4.4. Escenario: Tamaño de letra 96 1.4.5. Escenario: Imágenes de texto 96 2 1.4.6. Escenario: Contraste aumentado 98 1.4.7. Escenario: Sin audio de fondo o audio bajo 99 1.4.8. Escenario: Presentación Visual 99 1.4.9. Escenario: Imágenes de texto (sin excepción) 99 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 2017 ICT Accessibility Testing Symposium: Automated & Manual Testing, WCAG 2.1, and Beyond
    Proceedings of the 2017 ICT Accessibility Testing Symposium: Automated & Manual Testing, WCAG 2.1, and Beyond Washington, DC, USA October 26 & 27, 2017 Partnership for Public Service Conference Center, Washington DC Organized by Accessibility Track Consulting, LLC www.ictaccessibilitytesting.org Contents Introduction from the Chair ....................................................................................1 Keynote. Trust but Verify: The Value of Accessibility Policies and Testing to Support Commitments .....................................................................................3 Workshop. Introduction to Accessibility Testing (‘Testing 201’) ..........................5 Workshop. Open Source Tools for Evaluating and Inspecting Web Accessibility of Organizations to Individual Pages ...........................................7 Workshop. 508 and Mobile Accessibility: How, When, Where and Why ..............9 Workshop. Integrating Accessibility Across the Development Lifecycle............. 13 Panel. Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Panel Discussion: Harmonize Accessibility Testing .................................................................... 17 Panel. EPUB Accessibility Conformance, Testing and Certification: A Comprehensive Implementation .................................................................... 21 Panel. Accessibility Testing: The Present, The Future........................................ 25 Federal Website WCAG 2.0 Compliance and Accessibility Trends ..................... 27 Agile Accessibility:
    [Show full text]