River Terminology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

River Terminology L L channel unit: fast water-turbulent, rapids .... 17 L dimensions, and patterns that determines how water movement as it passes over a steep well it adjusts to and recovers from the changes channel bottom with gradients exceeding L in quantities of flow or sediment. 8%. Most of the water surface is broken by short, irregular plunges creating white- L channel storage Volume of water at a given time water, frequently characterized by very in the channel or over the floodplain of streams large substrates, and a well-defined stepped C in a drainage basin or river reach. longitudinal profile that exceeds 50% in supercritical flow. C channel type A system for characterizing channels based on features such as channel and valley chute Rapidly flowing water within narrow, C confinement, gradient, and erosional and deposi- steep slots of bedrock. tional processes, such as: C falls Free-falling water with vertical or Confinement Gradient Sediment process nearly vertical drops as it falls over an C Confined >4% Source obstruction. Falling water is turbulent and Moderately appears white in color from trapped air confined 1.5-4% Transport bubbles. C Unconfined <1.5% Response classic falls Well-defined falls over a C Note: See Tables 1-3 for various systems for charac- sheer drop. terizing channel types. C complex falls Falls with a series of drops, channel unit Relatively homogeneous areas of a breaks, or channels. C channel that differ in depth, velocity, and sub- strate characteristics from adjoining areas, curtain falls Falls with a broad, C creating different habitat types in a stream uninterupted face. channel. C flume falls Falls within a narrow, confin- fast water-turbulent Channel with a gradient ing channel. C that exceeds 1%. A channel unit of this type ribbon falls Elongate, narrow falls. possesses supercritical flow with hydraulic C jumps sufficient to entrain air bubbles and create whitewater. C L L L rapids (from Helm 1985) L cascade (from Helm 1985) rapids Moderately steep stream area (4-8% r gradient) with supercritical flow between 15 ~ cascade Highly turbulent series of short falls and 50%, rapid and turbulent water move- L and small scour basins, with very rapid ment, surface with intermittent whitewater L TABLE1.-Channel Types of Paustian et al. (1983) L Type Hydrology-slope Sediment Valleyform A Sediment source L Precipitation headwaters Upper slopes steep B Precipitation transition zone Sediment transport Slope-valley interface L C Precipitation runoff Sediment deposition Valley bottom D Glacial runoff L High sediment load Glacial outwash valleys E Tidal Sediment deposition Estuarine L C ~ :J 18 ... channel unit: fast water-turbulent, riffles :J -., with breaking waves, coarse substrate, with ..J exposed boulders at low flows, and a some- -, what planar longitudinal profile. -..I -..I-, :J ---, run (from Helm 1985) ..J sheet Shallow water reach that flows uni- :J formly over smooth bedrock. Also referred --, riffles(from Helm 1985) to as a slipface. -.I slow water Stream channel with a gradient of --.I riffles Shallow reaches with low subcritical less than 1% that is typically deeper than the flow (1-4% gradient) in alluvial channels of reach average with a streambed composed of -.J finer particles that are unstable, character- finer substrates and a smooth, unbroken water ized by small hydraulic jumps over rough surface. bed material, causing small ripples, waves, edgewater A shallow, quiet area along the and eddies, without breaking the surface margins of a stream with water velocity that -.I tension. Stable riffles are important in is low or nonexistent. Edgewater areas are maintaining the water level in the pool typically associated with riffles. immediately upstream of the riffle. embayment An off-channel, pond-like water high gradient riffle A collective term for body that has a connection (sometimes rapids and cascades. Steeper reaches of narrow) to the stream channel. moderately deep, swift (greater than 4% gradient), and very turbulent waters. - Generally, these riffles have exposed substrates that are dominated by large boulders and rocks. See cascadeand rapids under fast water-turbulent under the main heading channel unit. low gradient riffle Shallow reaches with swiftly flowing (gradients less than 4%), turbulent water with some partially glide (from Helm 1985) --I exposed substrate, usually cobble or --, gravel. glide A shallow stream reach with a maxi- -.I mum depth that is 5% or less of the average step run Low gradient runs with small (0.5 stream width, a water velocity less than 20 to 2 m) riffle steps between runs. cm (8 in) per second, and without surface turbulence. fast water-nonturbulent Reaches that -J are deeper than riffles, with little or no pool Aquatic habitat in a stream with a supercritical flow. The water surface in gradient less than 1% that is normally such reaches has a smoother, laminar deeper and wider than aquatic habitats appearance. immediately above and below it. run Swiftly flowing stream reach with a dammed pool Pool formed by im- ---' gradient greater than 4%,little to no surface pounded water from complete or nearly agitation, waves, or turbulence, no major complete channel blockage caused by a flow obstructions, approximately uniform beaver dam, log jam, rock slide, or flow, substrates of variable particle size, and stream habitat improvement structure. A water surface slope roughly parallel to the dammed pool may form by substrate overall stream gradient. deposition at the confluence of a tribu- ~~ i , I L 0 channel unit ~ 19 0 0 TABLE2.-Channel Types of Rosgen (1996) 0 Type Description Slope Landform Aa Very steep, deeply entrenched with >10% High relief, deeply entrenched and erosional. 0 debris transport. Vertical steps with deep scour pools and waterfalls. 0 A Steep, entrenched, step-pool with 4-10% High relief, entrenched and confined. Cascading high energy and debris transport. reaches with frequently spaced deep pools in a 0 step-pool bed morphology. B Moderately entrenched, moderate 2-3.9% Moderate relief, colluvial deposition and (or) [J gradient, riffle-dominated, residual soil, moderate entrenchment, and moderate infrequently spaced pools with width: depth ratio. Predominately rapids with [J very stable banks and profile. occasional pools in a narrow, gently sloping valley. C Low gradient, meandering, point <2% Broad valley with terraces associated with the [J bar-, riffle-, pool-, alluvial channels floodplain, alluvial soils, slightly entrenched, and with broad, well-defined floodplain. well-defined meandering channel. Riffle-pool [J streambed morphology. D Wide channel with longitudinal and <4% Broad valley with abundant sediment in alluvial [J transverse bars with eroding banks. and colluvial fans, glacial debris, and other depositional features exhibiting active lateral [J adjustment. Da Anastomosing channels that are <0.5% Broad, low-gradient valleys with fine alluvium [J narrow and deep with stable banks, and (or) lacustrine soil. Anastomosing geologic very gentle relief, highly variable control creating fine deposition with well-vegetated sinuosity, and an expansive well- bars that are laterally stable and a broad wetland [J vegetated floodplain and associated floodplain. wetlands. [J E Low gradient, riffle-pool with <2% Broad valley-meadow. High sinuosity with stable very efficient and stable well-vegetated banks and floodplain of alluvial [J meandering rate, low width: depth material. Riffle-pool morphology with very low ratio, and little deposition. width: depth ratio. [J F Entrenched meandering riffle-pool <2% Entrenched in highly weathered material with with a low gradient and high gentle gradient and a high width: depth ratio. [J width: depth ratio. Riffle-pool morphology with meandering channel that is laterally unstable with high bank erosion. [J G Entrenched" gully" step-pool with 2-3.9% Gully, step-pool morphology with moderate slopes, moderate gradient and low low width: depth ratio, narrow valleys that are [J width: depth ratio. deeply incised alluvial or colluvial material. Unstable with grade control problems and high c bank erosion rates. c Flood-prone area Bank-full stage c range c Q DA E F G 4% <4% c <0.5% <2% ~ 2:4% Cross c section C Plan view L Stream L types Aa+ L Channel type classification (from Rosgen 1994 with permission of ElsevierScience) L L r= 20 ~ channel unit:slowwater,pool,dammed pool,backwater :J\ :J TABLE 3.-Channel Types of Montgomery and Buffington (1993) :J Channel type Description :J Cascade High gradient stream with large substrate where the flow is strongly three- dimensional and energy dissipation is dominated by tumbling jet-and-wake flow ::J and hydraulic jumps. ::J Step-pool A large series of steps created by larger substrate that separate pools with finer substrates. :J Plane-bed Lack of a well-defined bedform that is characterized by long reaches of relatively planar channel bed with occasional rapids. Pool-riffle Undulating channel bed with a sequence of bars, pools, and riffles. :Jf :JI Regime Low-gradient, sandbed channel that exhibits a succession of bedforms with increasing flow. Braided Braided pattern of medial and longitudinal bars that are wide and shallow with a high :J sediment supply. ::J ::J beaver pool Pool formed behind a dam created by beaver. ::J debris pool Pool formed behind an a channel obstruction created by an ::J accumulation of woody debris. ::J landslide pool Pool created due to channel obstruction by materials ::J dammed pool (from Helm 1985) transferred into the channel from adjacent slope or channel failures. ::J tary stream with the main stem river when water velocity decreases. ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J secondary channel (from Helm 1985) ::J backwater (from Helm 1985) secondary channel Relatively small ::J pools formed outside the mainstream backwater (1) A pool formed by water wetted channel, sometimes separated :J backing upstream from an obstruc- by formation of a bar deposited along tion, such as narrowing of the channel the margin of the main channel.
Recommended publications
  • A 3D Forward Stratigraphic Model of Fluvial Meander-Bend Evolution for Prediction of Point-Bar Lithofacies Architecture
    This is a repository copy of A 3D forward stratigraphic model of fluvial meander-bend evolution for prediction of point-bar lithofacies architecture. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/116031/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Yan, N orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-5861, Mountney, NP orcid.org/0000-0002-8356-9889, Colombera, L et al. (1 more author) (2017) A 3D forward stratigraphic model of fluvial meander-bend evolution for prediction of point-bar lithofacies architecture. Computers & Geosciences, 105. pp. 65-80. ISSN 0098-3004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.04.012 © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Author’s Accepted Manuscript A 3D forward stratigraphic model of fluvial meander-bend evolution for prediction of point-bar lithofacies architecture Na Yan, Nigel P.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection Against Wave-Based Erosion
    Protection against Wave­based Erosion The guidelines below address the elements of shore structure design common to nearly all erosion control structures subject to direct wave action and run-up. 1. Minimize the extent waterward. Erosion control structures should be designed with the smallest waterward footprint possible. This minimizes the occupation of the lake bottom, limits habitat loss and usually results in a lower cost to construct the project. In the case of stone revetments, the crest width should be only as wide as necessary for a stable structure. In general, the revetment should follow the cross-section of the bluff or dune and be located as close to the bluff or dune as possible. For seawalls, the distance that the structure extends waterward of the upland must be minimized. If the seawall height is appropriately designed to prevent the majority of overtopping, there is no engineering rationale based only on erosion control which justifies extending a seawall out into the water. 2. Minimize the impacts to adjacent properties. The design of the structure must consider the potential for damaging adjacent property. Projects designed to extend waterward of the shore will affect the movement of littoral material, reducing the overall beach forming process which in turn may cause accelerated erosion on adjacent or down-drift properties with less protective beaches. Seawalls, (and to a lesser extent, stone revetments) change the direction (wave reflection) and intensity of wave energy along the shore. Wave reflection can cause an increase in the total energy at the seawall or revetment interface with the water, allowing sand and gravel to remain suspended in the water, which will usually prevent formation of a beach directly fronting the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 4: Sediment Deposition and River Structures
    LESSON 4: SEDIMENT DEPOSITION AND RIVER STRUCTURES ESSENTIAL QUESTION: What combination of factors both natural and manmade is necessary for healthy river restoration and how does this enhance the sustainability of natural and human communities? GUIDING QUESTION: As rivers age and slow they deposit sediment and form sediment structures, how are sediments and sediment structures important to the river ecosystem? OVERVIEW: The focus of this lesson is the deposition and erosional effects of slow-moving water in low gradient areas. These “mature rivers” with decreasing gradient result in the settling and deposition of sediments and the formation sediment structures. The river’s fast-flowing zone, the thalweg, causes erosion of the river banks forming cliffs called cut-banks. On slower inside turns, sediment is deposited as point-bars. Where the gradient is particularly level, the river will branch into many separate channels that weave in and out, leaving gravel bar islands. Where two meanders meet, the river will straighten, leaving oxbow lakes in the former meander bends. TIME: One class period MATERIALS: . Lesson 4- Sediment Deposition and River Structures.pptx . Lesson 4a- Sediment Deposition and River Structures.pdf . StreamTable.pptx . StreamTable.pdf . Mass Wasting and Flash Floods.pptx . Mass Wasting and Flash Floods.pdf . Stream Table . Sand . Reflection Journal Pages (printable handout) . Vocabulary Notes (printable handout) PROCEDURE: 1. Review Essential Question and introduce Guiding Question. 2. Hand out first Reflection Journal page and have students take a minute to consider and respond to the questions then discuss responses and questions generated. 3. Handout and go over the Vocabulary Notes. Students will define the vocabulary words as they watch the PowerPoint Lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Depositional Signature of Strongly Aggradational Chute-And-Pool Bedforms
    Marine and River Dune Dynamics – MARID VI – 1-3 April 2019 - Bremen, Germany Build-up-and-fill structure: The depositional signature of strongly aggradational chute-and-pool bedforms Arnoud Slootman College of Petroleum Engineering & Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia – [email protected] Matthieu J.B. Cartigny Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom – [email protected] Age J. Vellinga National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom – [email protected] ABSTRACT: Chute -and -pools are unstable, hybrid bedforms of the upper flo w-regime, pop u- lating the stability field in between two stable end-members (antidunes and cyclic steps). Chute-and-pools are manifested by supercritical flow (chute) down the lee side and subcritical flow (pool) on the stoss side, linked through a hydraulic jump in the trough. The associated sedimentary structures reported here were generated at the toe-of-slope of a Pleistocene car- bonate platform dominated by resedimentation of skeletal sand and gravel by supercritical density underflows. It is shown that wave-breaking on growing antidunes occurred without destruction of the antidune like commonly observed for antidunes in subaerial flows. This led to the formation of chute-and-pools that were not preceded by intense upstream scouring, in- terpreted to be the result of high bed aggradation rates. The term aggradational chute-and- pool is proposed for these
    [Show full text]
  • Landforms & Bodies of Water
    Name Date Landforms & Bodies of Water - Vocab Cards hill noun a raised area of land smaller than a mountain. We rode our bikes up and down the grassy hill. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: island noun a piece of land surrounded by water on all sides. Marissa's family took a vacation on an island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: 1 lake noun a large body of fresh or salt water that has land all around it. The lake freezes in the wintertime and we go ice skating on it. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: landform noun any of the earth's physical features, such as a hill or valley, that have been formed by natural forces of movement or erosion. I love canyons and plains, but glaciers are my favorite landform. Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: 2 mountain noun a land mass with great height and steep sides. It is much higher than a hill. Someday I'm going to hike and climb that tall, steep mountain. Synonyms: peak Use this word in a sentence or give an example Draw this vocab word or an example of it: to show you understand its meaning: ocean noun a part of the large body of salt water that covers most of the earth's surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Restoration, a Natural Channel Design
    Stream Restoration Prep8AICI by the North Carolina Stream Restonltlon Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant INC STATE UNIVERSITY I North Carolina State University and North Carolina A&T State University commit themselves to positive action to secure equal opportunity regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, age or disability. In addition, the two Universities welcome all persons without regard to sexual orientation. Contents Introduction to Fluvial Processes 1 Stream Assessment and Survey Procedures 2 Rosgen Stream-Classification Systems/ Channel Assessment and Validation Procedures 3 Bankfull Verification and Gage Station Analyses 4 Priority Options for Restoring Incised Streams 5 Reference Reach Survey 6 Design Procedures 7 Structures 8 Vegetation Stabilization and Riparian-Buffer Re-establishment 9 Erosion and Sediment-Control Plan 10 Flood Studies 11 Restoration Evaluation and Monitoring 12 References and Resources 13 Appendices Preface Streams and rivers serve many purposes, including water supply, The authors would like to thank the following people for reviewing wildlife habitat, energy generation, transportation and recreation. the document: A stream is a dynamic, complex system that includes not only Micky Clemmons the active channel but also the floodplain and the vegetation Rockie English, Ph.D. along its edges. A natural stream system remains stable while Chris Estes transporting a wide range of flows and sediment produced in its Angela Jessup, P.E. watershed, maintaining a state of "dynamic equilibrium." When Joseph Mickey changes to the channel, floodplain, vegetation, flow or sediment David Penrose supply significantly affect this equilibrium, the stream may Todd St. John become unstable and start adjusting toward a new equilibrium state.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistic Analysis of Channel Pattern Thresholds: Meandering, Braiding, and Incising
    Geomorphology 38Ž. 2001 281–300 www.elsevier.nlrlocatergeomorph Logistic analysis of channel pattern thresholds: meandering, braiding, and incising Brian P. Bledsoe), Chester C. Watson 1 Department of CiÕil Engineering, Colorado State UniÕersity, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA Received 22 April 2000; received in revised form 10 October 2000; accepted 8 November 2000 Abstract A large and geographically diverse data set consisting of meandering, braiding, incising, and post-incision equilibrium streams was used in conjunction with logistic regression analysis to develop a probabilistic approach to predicting thresholds of channel pattern and instability. An energy-based index was developed for estimating the risk of channel instability associated with specific stream power relative to sedimentary characteristics. The strong significance of the 74 statistical models examined suggests that logistic regression analysis is an appropriate and effective technique for associating basic hydraulic data with various channel forms. The probabilistic diagrams resulting from these analyses depict a more realistic assessment of the uncertainty associated with previously identified thresholds of channel form and instability and provide a means of gauging channel sensitivity to changes in controlling variables. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Channel stability; Braiding; Incision; Stream power; Logistic regression 1. Introduction loads, loss of riparian habitat because of stream bank erosion, and changes in the predictability and vari- Excess stream power may result in a transition ability of flow and sediment transport characteristics from a meandering channel to a braiding or incising relative to aquatic life cyclesŽ. Waters, 1995 . In channel that is characteristically unstableŽ Schumm, addition, braiding and incising channels frequently 1977; Werritty, 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Nearshore Restoration Recommendations Whatcom County Shoreline Management Project
    Marine Nearshore Restoration Recommendations Whatcom County Shoreline Management Project 1 7 Old Fish 6 Packers Pier Tongue Point Blaine Marina Site Specific Recommendations t pi S o o hm ia m e S Semiahmoo Restoration Site 5 Marina Shoreline Reach Breaks The large platform and foundation could be removed to restore the beach and fringing marsh D Shoreline Modifications 1 2 a kota Cr 3 Removal of bulkheads that protrude into 4 Retaining Walls Remove the intertidal dilapidated Groins and Jetties dock 5 6 Miscellaneous Structures 1 7 C al 8 Piers ifo rn ia 9 2 C r Platforms 4 3 C r 4 nd Bulkheads ra rt Birch Point 5 e Outfall PipesB Cottonwood Beach 6 Building (Shorelines Only) 7 Administrative Boundries r 2 e Birch Bay v Village Marina 3 i 8 R Lummi Nation k Remove groins and bulkheads c a along Birch Bay Drive to restore upper s k beach and backshore habitats Whatcom County oo N e m ns t Mai 2 For more information on restoration sites, includi1ng non site-specific recommendations, see the Whatcom County Shoreline Management Project Inventory & 1 Characterization Report (Backgr1ound document Vol. I) and the Marine Resources Committee Document, Restoration Recommendations by Shoreline Reach by Coastal Ge1o1logic Services and Adolfson and9 Assoc1ia0 tes (2006). 2 DATA SOURCES: Restoration Sites - Coastal Geologic Remove bulkheads along these bluffs, which are the sole Services, Inc., Mod8ifications - WC 2005 (Pictometry 2004), T sediment source for accretionary shoreforms and valuable er r ell C Outfall Pipes - REsources, DNR, Pictometry, Contour lines 2 habitat in Birch Bay and State Park reaches r 1 10 meter intervals, USGS Elevation labels in feet.
    [Show full text]
  • LOUISIANA K. Meyer-Arendt Department of Geography
    65. USA--LOUISIANA K. Meyer-Arendt D.W. Davis Department of Geography Department of Earth Science Mississippi State University Nicholls State University Starkville, Mississippi 38759 Thibodaux, Louisiana 70301 United States of America United States of America INTRODUCTION Louisiana's 40,000 Inn 2 coastal zone developed over the last 7,000 years by the progradation, aggradation, and accretion of sediments introduced via various courses of the Mississippi River (Frazier 1967). The deltaic plain (32,000 km'), through which the modern river cuts diagon­ ally !Fig , 1), consists of vast wetlands and waterbodies. With eleva­ tions ranging from sea level up to 1.5 m, it is interrupted by natural levee ridges which decrease distally until they disappear beneath the marsh surface. The downdrift chenier plain of southwest Louisiana (8,000 km') consists of marshes, large round-to-oblong lakes, and stranded, oak covered beach ridges known as cheniers (Howe et al. 1935). This landscape is the result of alternating long-term phases of shoreline accretion and erosion that were dependent upon the proximit of an active sediment-laden river, and a low-energy marine environment (Byrne et al. 1959). Since the dyking of the Mississippi River, fluvial sedimentation in the deltaic plain has effectively been halted. Today, most Missis­ sippi River sediment is deposited on the outer continental shelf; only at the mouth of the Atchafalaya River distributary is deltaic sedimen­ tation subaerially significant (Adams and Baumann 1980). Over mos of the coastal zone, subsidence, saltwater intrusion, wave erosion, canalization, and other hydrologic modification have led to a rapid increase in the surface area of water (Davis 1986, Walker e al.
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development
    Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development River Characteristics - Sediment Transport - River Velocity - Terminology The illustrations below represent the 3 general classifications into which rivers are placed according to specific characteristics. These categories are: Youthful, Mature and Old Age. A Rejuvenated River, one with a gradient that is raised by the earth's movement, can be an old age river that returns to a Youthful State, and which repeats the cycle of stages once again. A brief overview of each stage of river development begins after the images. A list of pertinent vocabulary appears at the bottom of this document. You may wish to consult it so that you will be aware of terminology used in the descriptive text that follows. Characteristics found in the 3 Stages of River Development: L. Immoor 2006 Geoteach.com 1 Youthful River: Perhaps the most dynamic of all rivers is a Youthful River. Rafters seeking an exciting ride will surely gravitate towards a young river for their recreational thrills. Characteristically youthful rivers are found at higher elevations, in mountainous areas, where the slope of the land is steeper. Water that flows over such a landscape will flow very fast. Youthful rivers can be a tributary of a larger and older river, hundreds of miles away and, in fact, they may be close to the headwaters (the beginning) of that larger river. Upon observation of a Youthful River, here is what one might see: 1. The river flowing down a steep gradient (slope). 2. The channel is deeper than it is wide and V-shaped due to downcutting rather than lateral (side-to-side) erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Water Shapes Land
    KEY CONCEPT Moving water shapes land. BEFORE, you learned NOW, you will learn •Erosion is the movement of • How moving water shapes rock and soil Earth’s surface • Gravity causes mass movements • How water moving under- of rock and soil ground forms caves and other features VOCABULARY EXPLORE Divides drainage basin p. 579 How do divides work? divide p. 579 floodplain p. 580 PROCEDURE MATERIALS alluvial fan p. 581 •sheet of paper 1 Fold the sheet of paper in thirds and tape delta p. 581 • tape it as shown to make a “ridge.” sinkhole p. 583 •paper clips 2 Drop the paper clips one at a time directly on top of the ridge from a height of about 30 cm. Observe what happens and record your observations. WHAT DO YOU THINK? How might the paper clips be similar to water falling on a ridge? Streams shape Earth’s surface. If you look at a river or stream, you may be able to notice something about the land around it. The land is higher than the river. If a river is running through a steep valley, you can easily see that the river is the low point. But even in very flat places, the land is sloping down to the river, which is itself running downhill in a low path through the land. NOTE-TAKING STRATEGY Running water is the major force shaping the landscape over most A main idea and detail of Earth. From the broad, flat land around the lower Mississippi River notes chart would be a good strategy to use for to the steep mountain valleys of the Himalayas, water running downhill taking notes about streams changes the land.
    [Show full text]