DOCSLIB.ORG

Reaction Mechanism-1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reaction Mechanism-1) Subject Chemistry Paper No and Title 5, ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction mechanism-1) Module No and Title Module 34: Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions Module Tag CHE_P5_M34 CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34 Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Factors Affecting Rate of Aromatic Nucleophilic substitution 3.1 Effect of Substrate Structure 3.2 Effect of Leaving Group 3.3 Effect of Attacking Nucleophile 4. Summary CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34 Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, you shall be able to Know the differences between aliphatic and aromatic nucleophilic substitution. Learn about the factors which affect the rates of aromatic nucleophilic substitution reaction. Identify suitable substrates, leaving groups and incoming nucleophiles for SRN1 reactions, benzyne reactions and SN1 and SN2 type reactions. Analyze factors governing suitability of reaction conditions for nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions 2. Introduction There are differences between aliphatic and aromatic nucleophilic substitution reactions. The most important mechanisms for aromatic nucleophilic substitution (SNAr) are 1. SN1 type 2. The addition-elimination mechanism 3. Elimination-addition mechanism or the benzyne mechanism 4. Substitution involving radicals (SRN1) For aromatic nucleophilic reactions the basic mechanisms are SNAr, benzyne mechanism, SN1 mechanism and SRN1 mechanism. The reactivity considerations are quite unimportant for aromatic nucleophilic reactions since in most cases there is only one potential leaving group in a molecule. Therefore attention is largely focused on the reactivity of one molecule compared with another and not on the comparison of the reactivity of different positions within the same molecule. CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34 Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions 3. Factors Affecting Rate of Aromatic Nucleophilic Substitution The common factors influencing rate of all three of these mechanisms are substrate structure, leaving group and solvent. We shall discuss each of them separately. 3.1 Effect of Substrate Structure The SNAr mechanisms follow addition-elimination steps, where, first the incoming nucleophile gets attached to the substrate and then elimination of leaving group takes place. In this type of reactions, aryl halides (with suitably placed substituents) react with strong nucleophiles to give substitution products. Interestingly, such reactions proceed via an anionic intermediate called “Meisenheimer complex”. Since, it is difficult for a nucleophile to attack an electron rich ring, when the aromatic ring contains deactivating or electron withdrawing groups, the reactions go faster. If the electron withdrawing groups are present on the ortho or para positions to the leaving group, great accelerations in rate of reactions have been observed. On the contrary, if the substrate has electron donating substituents, then reactions go slower. For common substituents following is the order of increasing ability to activate aromatic rings for SNAr substitutions + + - N2 >NO>NO2>SO2Me>NMe3 >CF3>CN>CHO>COR>COOH>SO3 >Br>Cl>I>COO- >H As can be seen, the nitrogen containing substituents act as good ligands enhancing rate of reactions manifolds. Of note, the position of substituents also greatly influence the rate of reaction for e.g., if the electron withdrawing nitro group is present at meta position than no delocalization of charge takes place and reactions become difficult. CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34 Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions Table 1: Groups listing in approximate descending order of activating ability in the SNAr mechanism. The benzyne mechanism of aromatic nucleophilic substitution involves elimination- addition, whereby, a distinct reaction intermediate benzyne is produced. In such reactions CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34 Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions products with substitution on the carbon directly bonded to the leaving group or to the carbon adjacent to it are formed in equal proportion. The benzyne intermediate has a triple bond in benzene ring which makes it a highly reactive species. When ortho and para substituents are present on the substrate only one benzyne intermediate can formed as shown below: Fig. 1: Benzyne mechanism of aromatic nucleophilic substitution at ortho and para positions However, if meta substituents are present then two benzynes may be formed based on which protons are more acidic. More acidic protons will be removed for benzyne formation. Fig. 2: Benzyne mechanism of aromatic nucleophilic substitution at meta position The nature of substituent Z is decisive towards benzyne intermediate formation. An electron withdrawing Z group favors removal of the ortho hydrogen, whereas, an electron-releasing Z group favors removal of the para hydrogen. Also, once the aryne CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34 Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions intermediate is formed, there are two possible sites where the nucleophile may attack, again the field effect of substituent Z plays an important role and an intermediate carbanion which gets better stabilized by Z will be favored. For substituents with -I effect, the more stable carbanion is the one in which the negative charge is closer to the substituent. 3.2 Effect of Leaving Group The common leaving groups in aliphatic nucleophilic substitution (halide, sulfate, sulfonate, + NR3 , etc.) are also common leaving groups in aromatic nucleophilic substitutions, but the groups NO2, OR, OAr, SO2R, and SR, which are not generally lost in aliphatic systems, are leaving groups when attached to aromatic rings. Surprisingly, NO2 is a particularly good leaving group. However, this depends greatly on the nature of the ͞ nucleophile, as illustrated by the fact that C6Cl5OCH3 treated with NH2 gives mostly C6Cl5NH2; that is, one methoxy group is replaced in preference to five chlorines. Stable anions are good leaving groups which results in lowering the activation energy while reaction rate is increased. An approximate order of leaving-group ability is + F > NO2 > OTs > SOPh > Cl, Br, I > N3 > NR3 > OAr, OR, SR, NH2 Amongst the halogens, fluoro is generally a much better leaving group than the other halogens, because of its highest electronegativity, which have reactivities fairly close together. The order is usually Cl>Br>I, but not always. The leaving-group order is quite different from that for the SN1 or SN2 mechanisms. The most likely explanation is that the first step of the SNAr mechanism is usually rate CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34 Reactivity-effect of substrate structure, leaving group and attacking nucleophile in nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions determining, and this step is promoted by groups with strong -I effects. This would explain why fluoro and nitro are such good leaving groups when this mechanism is operating. Fluoro is the poorest leaving group of the halogens when the second step of the SNAr mechanism is rate determining or when the benzyne mechanism is operating. The + four halogens, as well as SPh, NMe3 , and OPO(OEt)2, have been shown to be leaving groups in the SRN1 mechanism. The only important leaving group in the SN1 mechanism + is N2 . 3.3 Effect of Attacking Nucleophile It is not possible to construct an invariant nucleophilicity order since different substrates and different conditions lead to different orders of nucleophilicity, however, an overall approximate order is as given below: ͞ NH2 > Ph3C ͞ > PhNH ͞ (aryne mechanism) > ArS ͞ >RO ͞ > R2NH > ArO ͞ > ͞ OH > ArNH2 > NH3 > I ͞ > Br ͞ >Cl ͞ > H2O > ROH In case of aliphatic nucleophilic substitution, nucleophilicity is generally dependent on base strength and nucleophilicity increases as the attacking atom moves down a column in the periodic table, but there are some surprising exceptions (e.g., ͞ OH), a stronger base than ArO͞ , is a poorer nucleophile. In a series of similar nucleophiles (e.g., substituted anilines), nucleophilicity is correlated with base strength. Oddly enough, the cyanide ion is not a nucleophile for aromatic systems, except for sulfonic acid salts and in the von Richter and Rosenmund–von Braun reactions, which are special cases. Studies on the nature of the nucleophile continue. Indeed, the second order rate constants for vicarious nucleophilic substitution reactions of some carbanions were measured to define electrophilicity parameters for electron-deficient heteroarenes. CHEMISTRY PAPER : 5 , ORGANIC CHEMISTRY-II (Reaction Mechanism- I) MODULE : 34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solvent Effects on Structure and Reaction Mechanism: a Theoretical Study of [2 + 2] Polar Cycloaddition Between Ketene and Imine
    J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7877-7881 7877 Solvent Effects on Structure and Reaction Mechanism: A Theoretical Study of [2 + 2] Polar Cycloaddition between Ketene and Imine Thanh N. Truong Henry Eyring Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 ReceiVed: March 25, 1998; In Final Form: July 17, 1998 The effects of aqueous solvent on structures and mechanism of the [2 + 2] cycloaddition between ketene and imine were investigated by using correlated MP2 and MP4 levels of ab initio molecular orbital theory in conjunction with the dielectric continuum Generalized Conductor-like Screening Model (GCOSMO) for solvation. We found that reactions in the gas phase and in aqueous solution have very different topology on the free energy surfaces but have similar characteristic motion along the reaction coordinate. First, it involves formation of a planar trans-conformation zwitterionic complex, then a rotation of the two moieties to form the cycloaddition product. Aqueous solvent significantly stabilizes the zwitterionic complex, consequently changing the topology of the free energy surface from a gas-phase single barrier (one-step) process to a double barrier (two-step) one with a stable intermediate. Electrostatic solvent-solute interaction was found to be the dominant factor in lowering the activation energy by 4.5 kcal/mol. The present calculated results are consistent with previous experimental data. Introduction Lim and Jorgensen have also carried out free energy perturbation (FEP) theory simulations with accurate force field that includes + [2 2] cycloaddition reactions are useful synthetic routes to solute polarization effects and found even much larger solvent - formation of four-membered rings.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaction Mechanism
    Reaction Mechanism A detailed sequence of steps for a reaction Reasonable mechanism: 1. Elementary steps sum to the overall reaction 2. Elementary steps are physically reasonable 3. Mechanism is consistent with rate law and other experimental observations (generally found from rate limiting (slow) step(s) A mechanism can be supported but never proven NO2 + CO NO + CO2 2 Observed rate = k [NO2] Deduce a possible and reasonable mechanism NO2 + NO2 NO3 + NO slow NO3 + CO NO2 + CO2 fast Overall, NO2 + CO NO + CO2 Is the rate law for this sequence consistent with observation? Yes Does this prove that this must be what is actually happening? No! NO2 + CO NO + CO2 2 Observed rate = k [NO2] Deduce a possible and reasonable mechanism NO2 + NO2 NO3 + NO slow NO3 + CO NO2 + CO2 fast Overall, NO2 + CO NO + CO2 Is the rate law for this sequence consistent with observation? Yes Does this prove that this must be what is actually happening? No! Note the NO3 intermediate product! Arrhenius Equation Temperature dependence of k kAe E/RTa A = pre-exponential factor Ea= activation energy Now let’s look at the NO2 + CO reaction pathway* (1D). Just what IS a reaction coordinate? NO2 + CO NO + CO2 High barrier TS for step 1 Reactants: Lower barrier TS for step 2 NO2 +NO2 +CO Products Products Bottleneck NO +CO2 NO +CO2 Potential Energy Step 1 Step 2 Reaction Coordinate NO2 + CO NO + CO2 NO22 NO NO 3 NO NO CO NO CO 222In this two-step reaction, there are two barriers, one for each elementary step. The well between the two transition states holds a reactive intermediate.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry 0310 - Organic Chemistry 1 Chapter 6
    Dr. Peter Wipf Chemistry 0310 - Organic Chemistry 1 Chapter 6. SN2 Reactions Nucleophilic substitution reactions occur when nucleophiles (electron-rich species) displace leaving groups on electrophiles (electron-poor species). The net result is the substitution of one group for another bonded to a carbon atom. Nucleophilicity is increased by a negative charge and an increase in the polarizability. The greater the size and the lower the electronegativity of an atom, the greater its polarizability. Leaving groups are stable species that can be detached with their bonding electrons from a molecule during reaction. Most good leaving groups are the conjugate bases of strong acids. Sulfonates (mesylates, tosylates, triflates, etc.) are popular leaving groups since they can be readily obtained from alcohols. Solvents also influence nucleophilicity. SN2 reactions are second-order reactions whose rates depend o the concentration of both the alkyl halide and the nucleophile. The transition state of the one-step SN2 process involves a trigonal bipyramidal carbon and results in an overall inversion of configuration. The order of reactivity of alkyl halides and alkyl sulfonates in SN2 reactions is CH3>1°>2°>3°. The activation energy, DG‡, determines the rate of a reaction: k = koexp(-DG‡/RT). The overall change in free energy, DG, determines the position of the thermodynamic equilibrium. A positive sign of DG is characteristic for an endergonic reaction, a negative DG is found for an exergonic process. The rate of a reaction can be measured and provides information about its mechanism. The reaction order is the sum of the exponents in the rate equation. Relative Leaving Group Abilities: Leaving Group Common Name krel AcO acetate 1 x 10-10 Cl chloride 0.0001 Br bromide 0.001 I iodide 0.01 O mesylate 1.00 H3C S O O O tosylate 0.70 H3C S O O O brosylate 2.62 Br S O O O nosylate 13 O2N S O O O fluorosulfate 29,000 F S O O O triflate 56,000 CF3 S O O O nonaflate 120,000 C4F9 S O O.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaving Group of Substrate Important
    1 Recap... • Last two lectures we looked at substitution reactions • We found that there we two (extreme) mechanisms • SN1 H H H H H PhS R H R Br R SPh Br • And SN2 H H H H PhS + Br R Br PhS R • We looked at many of the factors that influenced which ..mechanism was operating... • Now we will turn our attention to elimination reactions 2 Elimination reactions NaOH NaOH or low Br H2O OH concentration • You have seen SN1 substitution • Reaction not sped up by altering nucleophile - it is not in RDS • In fact if we increase the amount / concentration of nucleophile we get the following... high O H + + + Br Br OH concentration H H • We observe an elimination reaction • Overall HBr is lost from the molecule • Isn't chemistry fun - these are the same conditions as substitution! • Next two lectures will look at the mechanisms for elimination • And how we control the nature of the reaction we observe... 3 Elimination, bimolecular E2 O H Br HO Br H H • E2 - Elimination bimolecular or 2nd order reaction • 2 molecules in the RDS or transition state H H H H H C H C H H C Br Br H O H C H O H C C H H H H C H C H H H • Two molecules in the rate determining step • So both the base and the substrate control the reaction • Both carbon skeleton & leaving group of substrate important In substitutions nucleophile acts as a nucleophile & attacks carbon In eliminations nucleophile acts as a base & attacks proton 4 Elimination, bimolecular E2: MO • Little confusing as need bonding & anti-bonding in same diagram! • Orbitals need to be parallel for maximum overlap
    [Show full text]
  • Carbonyl Chemistry I: Additions to Carbonyl Groups
    Paul Bracher Chem 30 – Section 4 Carbonyl Chemistry I: Additions to Carbonyl Groups Section Agenda 1) Lessons from Exam I, Course Feedbeck Mechanism on Web Site 2) Carbonyl Groups: Structure, Bonding, Molecular Orbitals, Geometry, Reactivity 3) Handout: In-Section Problem Set 4) Handout: In-Section Solution Set 5) Weekly Office Hours: Thursday, 3-4PM and 8-9PM, in Bauer Lobby Structure and Bonding · Carbonyl carbons are roughly sp2 hybridized Molecular Orbital Picture and planar with bond angles near 120 degrees bonding p orbital antibonding p* orbital · The C=O p bond is formed by the overlap of two unhybridized p orbitals. The bond is polarized due to the different electronegativities of carbon and oxygen. 105 o Resonance Model O O Bürgi-Dunitz angle · Another way to picture carbonyl groups is I II through an MO picture. Since the coefficient of · Resonance form II suggests that the carbon pO’s contribution is greater in pC=O, then atom is surrounded by less negative charge conservation of blending atomic orbitals into density than oxygen, rendering the carbon more molecular orbitals tells you that pC must be a electrophilic. larger contributor to the p*C=O orbital. · When reagents add to carbonyl double bonds, · The larger coefficient on oxygen in the filled the nucleophile attacks the carbon atom. orbital explains why the oxygen atom behaves as a Lewis base (it commonly complexes with · Due to the increased negative charge density Lewis acids). The larger coefficient on carbon on oxygen, Lewis acids (such as protons) in the empty antibonding orbital explains why it commonly complex with oxygen.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 Chemical Kinetics
    Chapter 14 Chemical Kinetics Learning goals and key skills: Understand the factors that affect the rate of chemical reactions Determine the rate of reaction given time and concentration Relate the rate of formation of products and the rate of disappearance of reactants given the balanced chemical equation for the reaction. Understand the form and meaning of a rate law including the ideas of reaction order and rate constant. Determine the rate law and rate constant for a reaction from a series of experiments given the measured rates for various concentrations of reactants. Use the integrated form of a rate law to determine the concentration of a reactant at a given time. Explain how the activation energy affects a rate and be able to use the Arrhenius Equation. Predict a rate law for a reaction having multistep mechanism given the individual steps in the mechanism. Explain how a catalyst works. C (diamond) → C (graphite) DG°rxn = -2.84 kJ spontaneous! C (graphite) + O2 (g) → CO2 (g) DG°rxn = -394.4 kJ spontaneous! 1 Chemical kinetics is the study of how fast chemical reactions occur. Factors that affect rates of reactions: 1) physical state of the reactants. 2) concentration of the reactants. 3) temperature of the reaction. 4) presence or absence of a catalyst. 1) Physical State of the Reactants • The more readily the reactants collide, the more rapidly they react. – Homogeneous reactions are often faster. – Heterogeneous reactions that involve solids are faster if the surface area is increased; i.e., a fine powder reacts faster than a pellet. 2) Concentration • Increasing reactant concentration generally increases reaction rate since there are more molecules/vol., more collisions occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaction Kinetics in Organic Reactions
    Autumn 2004 Reaction Kinetics in Organic Reactions Why are kinetic analyses important? • Consider two classic examples in asymmetric catalysis: geraniol epoxidation 5-10% Ti(O-i-C3H7)4 O DET OH * * OH + TBHP CH2Cl2 3A mol sieve OH COOH5C2 L-(+)-DET = OH COOH5C2 * OH geraniol hydrogenation OH 0.1% Ru(II)-BINAP + H2 CH3OH P(C6H5)2 (S)-BINAP = P(C6 H5)2 • In both cases, high enantioselectivities may be achieved. However, there are fundamental differences between these two reactions which kinetics can inform us about. 1 Autumn 2004 Kinetics of Asymmetric Catalytic Reactions geraniol epoxidation: • enantioselectivity is controlled primarily by the preferred mode of initial binding of the prochiral substrate and, therefore, the relative stability of intermediate species. The transition state resembles the intermediate species. Finn and Sharpless in Asymmetric Synthesis, Morrison, J.D., ed., Academic Press: New York, 1986, v. 5, p. 247. geraniol hydrogenation: • enantioselectivity may be dictated by the relative reactivity rather than the stability of the intermediate species. The transition state may not resemble the intermediate species. for example, hydrogenation of enamides using Rh+(dipamp) studied by Landis and Halpern (JACS, 1987, 109,1746) 2 Autumn 2004 Kinetics of Asymmetric Catalytic Reactions “Asymmetric catalysis is four-dimensional chemistry. Simple stereochemical scrutiny of the substrate or reagent is not enough. The high efficiency that these reactions provide can only be achieved through a combination of both an ideal three-dimensional structure (x,y,z) and suitable kinetics (t).” R. Noyori, Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis,Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1994, p.3. “Studying the photograph of a racehorse cannot tell you how fast it can run.” J.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactions of Aromatic Compounds Just Like an Alkene, Benzene Has Clouds of  Electrons Above and Below Its Sigma Bond Framework
    Reactions of Aromatic Compounds Just like an alkene, benzene has clouds of electrons above and below its sigma bond framework. Although the electrons are in a stable aromatic system, they are still available for reaction with strong electrophiles. This generates a carbocation which is resonance stabilized (but not aromatic). This cation is called a sigma complex because the electrophile is joined to the benzene ring through a new sigma bond. The sigma complex (also called an arenium ion) is not aromatic since it contains an sp3 carbon (which disrupts the required loop of p orbitals). Ch17 Reactions of Aromatic Compounds (landscape).docx Page1 The loss of aromaticity required to form the sigma complex explains the highly endothermic nature of the first step. (That is why we require strong electrophiles for reaction). The sigma complex wishes to regain its aromaticity, and it may do so by either a reversal of the first step (i.e. regenerate the starting material) or by loss of the proton on the sp3 carbon (leading to a substitution product). When a reaction proceeds this way, it is electrophilic aromatic substitution. There are a wide variety of electrophiles that can be introduced into a benzene ring in this way, and so electrophilic aromatic substitution is a very important method for the synthesis of substituted aromatic compounds. Ch17 Reactions of Aromatic Compounds (landscape).docx Page2 Bromination of Benzene Bromination follows the same general mechanism for the electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS). Bromine itself is not electrophilic enough to react with benzene. But the addition of a strong Lewis acid (electron pair acceptor), such as FeBr3, catalyses the reaction, and leads to the substitution product.
    [Show full text]
  • AROMATIC NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTION-PART -2 Electrophilic Substitution
    Dr. Tripti Gangwar AROMATIC NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTION-PART -2 Electrophilic substitution ◦ The aromatic ring acts as a nucleophile, and attacks an added electrophile E+ ◦ An electron-deficient carbocation intermediate is formed (the rate- determining step) which is then deprotonated to restore aromaticity ◦ electron-donating groups on the aromatic ring (such as -OH, -OCH3, and alkyl) make the reaction faster, since they help to stabilize the electron-poor carbocation intermediate ◦ Lewis acids can make electrophiles even more electron-poor (reactive), increasing the reaction rate. For example FeBr3 / Br2 allows bromination to occur at a useful rate on benzene, whereas Br2 by itself is slow). In fact, a substitution reaction does occur! (But, as you may suspect, this isn’t an electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction.) In this substitution reaction the C-Cl bond breaks, and a C-O bond forms on the same carbon. The species that attacks the ring is a nucleophile, not an electrophile The aromatic ring is electron-poor (electrophilic), not electron rich (nucleophilic) The “leaving group” is chlorine, not H+ The position where the nucleophile attacks is determined by where the leaving group is, not by electronic and steric factors (i.e. no mix of ortho– and para- products as with electrophilic aromatic substitution). In short, the roles of the aromatic ring and attacking species are reversed! The attacking species (CH3O–) is the nucleophile, and the ring is the electrophile. Since the nucleophile is the attacking species, this type of reaction has come to be known as nucleophilic aromatic substitution. n nucleophilic aromatic substitution (NAS), all the trends you learned in electrophilic aromatic substitution operate, but in reverse.
    [Show full text]
  • Ketenes 25/01/2014 Part 1
    Baran Group Meeting Hai Dao Ketenes 25/01/2014 Part 1. Introduction Ph Ph n H Pr3N C A brief history Cl C Ph + nPr NHCl Ph O 3 1828: Synthesis of urea = the starting point of modern organic chemistry. O 1901: Wedekind's proposal for the formation of ketene equivalent (confirmed by Staudinger 1911) Wedekind's proposal (1901) 1902: Wolff rearrangement, Wolff, L. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1902, 325, 129. 2 Wolff adopt a ketene structure in 1912. R 2 hν R R2 1905: First synthesis and characterization of a ketene: in an efford to synthesize radical 2, 1 ROH R C Staudinger has synthesized diphenylketene 3, Staudinger, H. et al., Chem. Ber. 1905, 1735. N2 1 RO CH or Δ C R C R1 1907-8: synthesis and dicussion about structure of the parent ketene, Wilsmore, O O J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1907, 1938; Wilsmore and Stewart Chem. Ber. 1908, 1025; Staudinger and Wolff rearrangement (1902) O Klever Chem. Ber. 1908, 1516. Ph Ph Cl Zn Ph O hot Pt wire Zn Br Cl Cl CH CH2 Ph C C vs. C Br C Ph Ph HO O O O O O O O 1 3 (isolated) 2 Wilsmore's synthesis and proposal (1907-8) Staudinger's synthesis and proposal (1908) wanted to make Staudinger's discovery (1905) Latest books: ketene (Tidwell, 1995), ketene II (Tidwell, 2006), Science of Synthesis, Vol. 23 (2006); Latest review: new direactions in ketene chemistry: the land of opportunity (Tidwell et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 1081). Search for ketenes, Google gave 406,000 (vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleophilic Substitution and Elimination Reactions
    8 NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTION AND ELIMINATION REACTIONS substitution reactions involve the replacement of one atom or group (X) by another (Y): We already have described one very important type of substitution reaction, the halogenation of alkanes (Section 4-4), in which a hydrogen atom is re- placed by a halogen atom (X = H, Y = halogen). The chlorination of 2,2- dimethylpropane is an example: CH3 CH3 I I CH3-C-CH3 + C12 light > CH3-C-CH2Cl + HCI I I Reactions of this type proceed by radical-chain mechanisms in which the bonds are broken and formed by atoms or radicals as reactive intermediates. This 8-1 Classification of Reagents as Electrophiles and Nucleophiles. Acids and Bases mode of bond-breaking, in which one electron goes with R and the other with X, is called homolytic bond cleavage: R 'i: X + Y. - X . + R : Y a homolytic substitution reaction There are a large number of reactions, usually occurring in solution, that do not involve atoms or radicals but rather involve ions. They occur by heterolytic cleavage as opposed to homolytic cleavage of el~ctron-pairbonds. In heterolytic bond cleavage, the electron pair can be considered to go with one or the other of the groups R and X when the bond is broken. As one ex- ample, Y is a group such that it has an unshared electron pair and also is a negative ion. A heterolytic substitution reaction in which the R:X bonding pair goes with X would lead to RY and :X? R~:X+ :YO --' :x@+ R :Y a heterolytic substitution reaction A specific substitution reaction of this type is that of chloromethane with hydroxide ion to form methanol: In this chapter, we shall discuss substitution reactions that proceed by ionic or polar mechanisms' in which the bonds cleave heterolytically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanism of the Cycloaddition Reaction of 1,3-Dipole Molecules with Acetylene: an Investigation with the Unified Reaction Valley Approach
    Theor Chem Acc (2014) 133:1423 DOI 10.1007/s00214-013-1423-z REGULAR ARTICLE The mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction of 1,3-dipole molecules with acetylene: an investigation with the unified reaction valley approach Marek Freindorf • Thomas Sexton • Elfi Kraka • Dieter Cremer Received: 10 September 2013 / Accepted: 12 November 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract The unified reaction valley approach (URVA) between vibrational modes lead to an unusual energy is used in connection with a dual-level approach to describe exchange between just those bending modes that facilitate the mechanism of ten different cycloadditions of 1,3- the formation of radicaloid centers. The relative magnitude dipoles XYZ (diazonium betaines, nitrilium betaines, azo- of the reaction barriers and reaction energies is rationalized methines, and nitryl hydride) to acetylene utilizing density by determining reactant properties, which are responsible functional theory for the URVA calculations and for the mutual polarization of the reactants and the stability CCSD(T)-F12/aug-cc-pVTZ for the determination of the of the bonds to be broken or formed. reaction energetics. The URVA results reveal that the mechanism of the 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions is determined Keywords Unified reaction valley approach Á early in the van der Waals range where the mutual orien- 1,3-Dipolar cycloadditions Reaction mechanism tation of the reactants (resulting from the shape of the Mutual polarization EnergyÁ transfer and dissipationÁ Á enveloping exchange repulsion spheres, electrostatic attraction, and dispersion forces) decides on charge trans- fer, charge polarization, the formation of radicaloid cen- 1 Introduction ters, and the asynchronicity of bond formation.
    [Show full text]