Eliwana Project Subterranean Fauna Assessment Biologic 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eliwana Project Subterranean Fauna Assessment Biologic 2017 Eliwana Project Subterranean Fauna Assessment Biologic Environmental Survey Fortescue Metals Group Ltd May 2018 Page 0 of 95 Eliwana Subterranean Fauna Assessment - 2017 Eliwana Project Subterranean Fauna Assessment 2017 DOCUMENT STATUS Approved for Issue to Revision Review / Approved for Author No. Issue Name Date D. Main, N. Gunawardene, 1 B. Durrant A. Winzer (FMG) 22/12/2017 S. Callan Final S. Callan, N. Gunawardene B. Durrant A. Winzer 15/05/2018 “IMPORTANT NOTE” Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of Biologic Environmental Survey Pty Ltd (“Biologic”). All enquiries should be directed to Biologic. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of Fortescue Metals Group Pty Ltd (“Client”) for the specific purpose only for which it is supplied. This report is strictly limited to the Purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date. Where we have obtained information from a government register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate. Where an assumption has been made, we have not made any independent investigations with respect to the matters the subject of that assumption. We are not aware of any reason why any of the assumptions are incorrect. This report is presented without the assumption of a duty of care to any other person (other than the Client) (“Third Party”). The report may not contain sufficient information for the purposes of a Third Party or for other uses. Without the prior written consent of Biologic: a) This report may not be relied on by a Third Party; and b) Biologic will not be liable to a Third Party for any loss, damage, liability or claim arising out of or incidental to a Third- Party publishing, using or relying on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report. If a Third Party uses or relies on the facts, content, opinions or subject matter contained in this report with or without the consent of Biologic, Biologic disclaims all risk and the Third Party assumes all risk and releases and indemnifies and agrees to keep indemnified Biologic from any loss, damage, claim or liability arising directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance on this report. In this note, a reference to loss and damage includes past and prospective economic loss, loss of profits, damage to property, injury to any person (including death) costs and expenses incurred in taking measures to prevent, mitigate or rectify any harm, loss of opportunity, legal costs, compensation, interest and any other direct, indirect, consequential or financial or other loss. Page | 1 Eliwana Subterranean Fauna Assessment - 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 8 2.1 Background / Project Summary ............................................................................ 8 2.2 Aims ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.3 Subterranean Fauna ............................................................................................. 11 2.3.1 Legislation and Guidance ................................................................................ 12 3 HABITAT CHARACTERISATION OF THE STUDY AREA ............................... 13 3.1 Geology................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Hydrogeology ....................................................................................................... 19 3.2.2 Aquitards ......................................................................................................... 22 3.3 Potential Habitat Summary .................................................................................. 22 4 METHODS ......................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Previous reports and surveys ............................................................................. 24 4.1.1 Sub-regional Fortescue survey reports ............................................................ 24 4.1.2 Local Fortescue survey report .......................................................................... 24 4.2 Survey methods ................................................................................................... 26 4.2.1 Survey timing and weather conditions .............................................................. 26 4.2.2 Site selection and survey effort ........................................................................ 28 4.2.3 Cumulative sample effort of the Study Area ..................................................... 32 4.2.4 Sampling methods ........................................................................................... 32 4.3 Conservation status and SRE classification ...................................................... 34 4.4 Limitations ............................................................................................................ 35 5 RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 37 5.1 Previous survey of the Study Area ..................................................................... 37 5.2 Current survey of the Study Area ....................................................................... 37 5.2.1 Troglofauna ..................................................................................................... 37 5.2.2 Stygofauna ...................................................................................................... 38 5.3 Combined troglofauna occurrence and distributions ....................................... 39 5.4 Combined stygofauna occurrence and distributions ........................................ 44 6 SUBTERRANEAN HABITAT ASSESSMENT ................................................... 47 6.1 Broadway .............................................................................................................. 50 6.1.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 50 6.1.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 50 6.2 West End ............................................................................................................... 55 6.2.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 55 6.2.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 55 6.3 Talisman ............................................................................................................... 58 6.3.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 58 6.3.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 58 6.4 Eagles Nest ........................................................................................................... 62 6.4.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 62 6.4.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 62 Page | 2 Eliwana Subterranean Fauna Assessment - 2017 6.5 East 3 .................................................................................................................... 65 6.5.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 65 6.5.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 65 6.6 East 4 .................................................................................................................... 67 6.6.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 67 6.6.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 67 6.7 Flying Fish West ................................................................................................... 69 6.7.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 69 6.7.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 69 6.8 Flying Fish ............................................................................................................ 73 6.8.1 Troglofauna habitat .......................................................................................... 73 6.8.2 Stygofauna habitat ........................................................................................... 73 6.9 Flying Fish East ...................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Nukuhiva Berland, 1935 Is a Troglobitic Wolf Spider (Araneae: Lycosidae), Not a Nursery-Web Spider (Pisauridae)
    Zootaxa 4028 (1): 129–135 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4028.1.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5D653C0B-187D-480C-8B4C-C1A2C76154D9 Nukuhiva Berland, 1935 is a troglobitic wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae), not a nursery-web spider (Pisauridae) VOLKER W. FRAMENAU1, 2, 3 & PEKKA T. LEHTINEN4 1Phoenix Environmental Sciences, 1/511 Wanneroo Road, Balcatta, Western Australia 6000, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia 3Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia 4Zoological Museum, University of Turku, Turku 20014, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The monotypic genus Nukuhiva Berland, 1935 with N. adamsoni (Berland, 1933) as type species, is re-described and transferred from the Pisauridae Simon, 1890 (fishing or nursery-web spiders) to the Lycosidae Sundevall, 1833 (wolf spiders) based on genitalic and somatic characters. Nukuhiva adamsoni, originally described from French Polynesia, ap- pears to inhabit mountainous habitats of volcanic origin. Its troglobitic morphology—comparatively small eyes and pale, uniform coloration—suggest it to be associated with subterranean habitats such as caves or lava tubes, similar to the Ha- waiian troglobitic species Lycosa howarthi Gertsch, 1973 and Adelocosa anops Gertsch, 1973. Key words: Lycosinae, subterranean, troglomorphy Introduction Obligatory (troglobitic) and facultative (troglophilic) inhabitants of caves and other subterranean systems are common in spiders world-wide (Deeleman-Reinhold & Deeleman 1980; Harvey et al.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records and Three New Species of the Family Symphytognathidae
    ZooKeys 1012: 21–53 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1012.57047 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research First records and three new species of the family Symphytognathidae (Arachnida, Araneae) from Thailand, and the circumscription of the genus Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995 Francisco Andres Rivera-Quiroz1,2, Booppa Petcharad3, Jeremy A. Miller1 1 Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Understanding Evolution group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwin- weg 2, 2333CR Leiden, the Netherlands 2 Institute for Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333BE Leiden, the Netherlands 3 Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Rangsit, Pathum Thani, 12121 Thailand Corresponding author: Francisco Andres Rivera-Quiroz ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Dimitrov | Received 29 July 2020 | Accepted 30 September 2020 | Published 26 January 2021 http://zoobank.org/4B5ACAB0-5322-4893-BC53-B4A48F8DC20C Citation: Rivera-Quiroz FA, Petcharad B, Miller JA (2021) First records and three new species of the family Symphytognathidae (Arachnida, Araneae) from Thailand, and the circumscription of the genus Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995. ZooKeys 1012: 21–53. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1012.57047 Abstract The family Symphytognathidae is reported from Thailand for the first time. Three new species: Anapistula choojaiae sp. nov., Crassignatha seeliam sp. nov., and Crassignatha seedam sp. nov. are described and illustrated. Distribution is expanded and additional morphological data are reported for Patu shiluensis Lin & Li, 2009. Specimens were collected in Thailand between July and August 2018. The newly described species were found in the north mountainous region of Chiang Mai, and Patu shiluensis was collected in the coastal region of Phuket.
    [Show full text]
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Museum Annual Report 2012–2013 3
    WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT 2012–2013 MuseuM Locations Western Australian Museum — Collections and Research Centre 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106 Western Australian Museum — Albany Residency Road, Albany, WA 6330 Western Australian Museum — Geraldton 1 Museum Place, Batavia Coast Marina, Geraldton, WA 6530 Western Australian Museum — Kalgoorlie-Boulder 17 Hannan Street, Kalgoorlie, WA 6430 Western Australian Museum — Maritime (‘The Western Australian Maritime Museum’) Victoria Quay, Fremantle, WA 6160 Western Australian Museum — Perth Perth Cultural Centre, James Street, Perth, WA 6000 Western Australian Museum — Shipwreck Galleries (‘The Shipwreck Galleries’) Cliff Street, Fremantle, WA 6160 Western Australian Museum — Museum Administration ‘Wellington Building’, 150 William Street, Perth, WA 6000 This annual report is available in PDF and an accessible format on the Western Australian Museum website. www.museum.wa.gov.au/about/corporate-documents PoStAl Locked Bag 49, Welshpool Western Australia 6986 Copies are archived in the State Library of Western Australia, the National Library Canberra and the StReet Western Australian Museum Library located at 49 Kew Street, Welshpool Kew Street, Welshpool. Western Australia 6106 For enquiries, comments or more information eleCtRoniC about staff or projects mentioned in this report, www.museum.wa.gov.au please visit the Western Australian Museum website [email protected] www.museum.wa.gov.au or refer to the details Telephone: 61 8 9212 3700 opposite for ways in which to contact the Museum. Facsimile: 61 8 9212 3882 CoVeR PHoto: Exploring the Secrets of the Afterlife: Magic, Mummies and Immortality in Ancient Egypt exhibition. Western Australian Museum – Perth, Published by the Western Australian Museum May 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, C07C 39/00 (2006.01) C07D 303/32 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, C07C 49/242 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (21) International Application Number: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PCT/US20 16/048092 PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (22) International Filing Date: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 22 August 2016 (22.08.2016) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (30) Priority Data: TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, 62/208,662 22 August 2015 (22.08.2015) US TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (71) Applicant: NEOZYME INTERNATIONAL, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Troglobitic Specimens Recorded
    655000 660000 665000 670000 675000 680000 685000 690000 695000 7450000 7445000 Deposit H Deposit I A3b (!*# (! Deposit B (! !((! Deposit G (! ^ 7440000 *# (! A2d Deposit C Legend (! (! Study Area Deposit D (! Deposit Deposit A Deposit F 7435000 Troglibitic specimens Mt Ella (! Anillini ‘sp. indet’. Deposit E (! Atelurinae ‘sp. indet.’ (! Cormocephalus 'CHI003'. A4 - -Pp (! Embioptera ‘sp. indet.’ 7430000 (! Hydrobiomorpha 'sp. indet.’ A4 - -Pp *# Meenoplidae ‘sp. indet.’ (! Nocticola ‘sp. indet.’ K A2d ^ Prethopalpus 'sp indet.' 0 2.5 5 !( Pseudodiploexochus ‘sp. nov.’ 7425000 Kilometres (! Trogiidae ‘sp. indet.’ Absolute Scale - 1:110,000 Figure: 4.3 Drawn: BG Project ID: 1459 Date: 12/2/2013 Troglobitic specimens recorded Coordinate System Unique Map ID: BG282 Name: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: GDA 1994 A3 Rio Tinto Greater West Angelas Subterranean Fauna Assessment This page has been left blank intentionally May 2013 34 Rio Tinto Greater West Angelas Subterranean Fauna Assessment 4.3 SUMMARY OF TROGLOFAUNA GROUPS RECORDED 4.3.1 Thysanura FAMILY NICOLETIIDAE Atelurinae ‘sp. Indet.’ A single specimen was collected from Deposit D in bore WAD 358. Pilbara thysanurans are poorly known and the taxonomy of Nicoletiidae is based on their DNA sequences rather than published species descriptions. Subterranean Atelurinae are well known throughout the Pilbara; however, nearly all of the species recognised to date appear to be range restricted. This specimen appears to be characteristic of the Pilbara nicoletiids. This species is a likely SRE. 4.3.2 Psocoptera FAMILY TROGIIDAE Trogiidae ‘sp. indet.’ A single specimen was collected from Deposit D in bore DDRC 006. Only identification to family level was possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae: Oonopidae)
    Zootaxa 3939 (1): 001–067 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3939.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:819DC388-56F3-4895-90AF-B07A903D9E2A ZOOTAXA 3939 The Amazonian Goblin Spiders of the New Genus Gradunguloonops (Araneae: Oonopidae) CRISTIAN J. GRISMADO, MATÍAS A. IZQUIERDO, MARÍA E. GONZÁLEZ MÁRQUEZ & MARTÍN J. RAMÍREZ División Aracnología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”—CONICET, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by M. Arnedo: 9 Feb. 2015; published: 27 Mar. 2015 CRISTIAN J. GRISMADO, MATÍAS A. IZQUIERDO, MARÍA E. GONZÁLEZ MÁRQUEZ & MARTÍN J. RAMÍREZ The Amazonian Goblin Spiders of the New Genus Gradunguloonops (Araneae: Oonopidae) (Zootaxa 3939) 67 pp.; 30 cm. 27 Mar. 2015 ISBN 978-1-77557-669-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-670-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2015 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2015 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use.
    [Show full text]
  • Reprint Covers
    TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM Speleological Monographs, Number 7 Studies on the CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA of North America Part V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher and James R. Reddell TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM SPELEOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, NUMBER 7 STUDIES ON THE CAVE AND ENDOGEAN FAUNA OF NORTH AMERICA, PART V Edited by James C. Cokendolpher Invertebrate Zoology, Natural Science Research Laboratory Museum of Texas Tech University, 3301 4th Street Lubbock, Texas 79409 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] and James R. Reddell Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin, PRC 176, 10100 Burnet Austin, Texas 78758 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] March 2009 TEXAS MEMORIAL MUSEUM and the TEXAS NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78705 Copyright 2009 by the Texas Natural Science Center The University of Texas at Austin All rights rereserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including electronic storage and retrival systems, except by explict, prior written permission of the publisher Printed in the United States of America Cover, The first troglobitic weevil in North America, Lymantes Illustration by Nadine Dupérré Layout and design by James C. Cokendolpher Printed by the Texas Natural Science Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas PREFACE This is the fifth volume in a series devoted to the cavernicole and endogean fauna of the Americas. Previous volumes have been limited to North and Central America. Most of the species described herein are from Texas and Mexico, but one new troglophilic spider is from Colorado (U.S.A.) and a remarkable new eyeless endogean scorpion is described from Colombia, South America.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Rchhn 83-1-Rubio
    REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 83: 243-247, 2010 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile RESEARCH ARTICLE The first Symphytognathidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from Argentina, with the description of a new species of Anapistula from the Yungas mountain rainforest La primera Symphytognathidae (Arachnida: Araneae) para Argentina, con la descripción de una nueva especie de Anapistula para la selva de montaña Yungas GONZALO D. RUBIO1’ * & ALDA GONZÁLEZ2 1 CONICET Córdoba, Diversidad Animal I, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299, X5000JJC Córdoba, Argentina 2 CONICET La Plata, Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (CEPAVE), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), Calle 2 N° 584, 1900 La Plata, Argentina * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The spider family Symphytognathidae is reported from Argentina for the first time. Anapistula yungas, a new species of this family is described and illustrated. The specimen was collected during an ecological study of biodiversity in different sites from northwestern Argentina. Dichotomous key to Neotropical female species of genus Anapistula is provided. Key words: Anapistula yungas, new record, Salta, taxonomy, Yungas eco-region. RESUMEN La familia de arañas Symphytognathidae es registrada por primera vez en Argentina. Anapistula yungas, una nueva especie de esta familia, es descripta e ilustrada. Los especímenes fueron colectados durante un estudio ecológico de biodiversidad
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper BIODIVERSITY of SOME POORLY KNOWN FAMILIES of SPIDERS (ARENEOMORPHAE: ARANEAE: ARACHNIDA) in INDIA
    Journal of Global Biosciences Peer Reviewed, Refereed, Open-Access Journal ISSN 2320-1355 Volume 10, Number 1, 2021, pp. 8352-8371 Website: www.mutagens.co.in URL: www.mutagens.co.in/jgb/vol.10/01/100112.pdf Research Paper BIODIVERSITY OF SOME POORLY KNOWN FAMILIES OF SPIDERS (ARENEOMORPHAE: ARANEAE: ARACHNIDA) IN INDIA Ajeet Kumar Tiwari1, Garima Singh2 and Rajendra Singh3 1Department of Zoology, Buddha P.G. College, Kushinagar, U.P., 2Department of Zoology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur-302004, Rajasthan, 3Department of Zoology, Deendayal Upadhyay University of Gorakhpur-273009, U.P., India. Abstract The present article deals with the faunal diversity of eleven families of spiders, viz. Palpimanidae, Pimoidae, Psechridae, Psilodercidae, Segestriidae, Selenopidae, Sicariidae, Stenochilidae, Symphytognathidae, Tetrablemmidae and Theridiosomatidae (Araneae: Arachnida) in different Indian states and union territories. None of the spider species of these families is recorded from following Indian states: Arunachal Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Mizoram, Telangana and Tripura and among the union territories they are reported from Andaman, Nicobar Islands, Jammu & Kashmir, Lakshadweep and Puducherry. Three families Tetrablemmidae, Selenopidae and Psechridae are represented by 10, 8 and 7 species, respectively. Other families are very poorly reported, 5 species in Segestriidae, 4 species each in Palpimanidae and Pimoidae, 3 species each in Psilodercidae and Stenochilidae, 2 species in Sicariidae while single species each in Symphytognathidae and Theridiosomatidae. Maximum number of spider species of these families were recorded in Tamil Nadu (16 species) followed by Kerala and Uttarakhand (10 species each), Maharashtra (9 species), Karnataka (8 species), and less number in other states. Endemism of these families is very high (62.5%), out of 48 species of all these families recorded in India, 30 species are strictly endemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronoecology of a Cave-Dwelling Orb-Weaver Spider, Meta Ovalis (Araneae: Tetragnathidae)
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2020 Chronoecology of a Cave-dwelling Orb-weaver Spider, Meta ovalis (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) Rebecca Steele East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Other Animal Sciences Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Population Biology Commons Recommended Citation Steele, Rebecca, "Chronoecology of a Cave-dwelling Orb-weaver Spider, Meta ovalis (Araneae: Tetragnathidae)" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3713. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3713 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chronoecology of the Cave-dwelling Orb-weaver Spider, Meta ovalis (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Biology ______________________ by Rebecca Steele May 2020 _____________________ Dr. Thomas C. Jones, Chair Dr. Darrell Moore Dr. Blaine Schubert Keywords: Circadian, Meta ovalis, Ecology, Spider, Cave ABSTRACT Chronoecology of the Cave-dwelling Orb-weaver Spider, Meta ovalis (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) by Rebecca Steele Circadian clocks enable coordination of essential biological and metabolic processes in relation to the 24-hour light cycle. However, there are many habitats that are not subject to this light cycle, such as the deep sea, arctic regions, and cave systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider World Records: a Resource for Using Organismal Biology As a Hook for Science Learning
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 31 October 2017. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/3972), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Mammola S, Michalik P, Hebets EA, Isaia M. 2017. Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them. PeerJ 5:e3972 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3972 Spider World Records: a resource for using organismal biology as a hook for science learning Stefano Mammola Corresp., 1, 2 , Peter Michalik 3 , Eileen A Hebets 4, 5 , Marco Isaia Corresp. 2, 6 1 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Italy 2 IUCN SSC Spider & Scorpion Specialist Group, Torino, Italy 3 Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany 4 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA 5 School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, United States 6 Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy Corresponding Authors: Stefano Mammola, Marco Isaia Email address: [email protected], [email protected] The public reputation of spiders is that they are deadly poisonous, brown and nondescript, and hairy and ugly. There are tales describing how they lay eggs in human skin, frequent toilet seats in airports, and crawl into your mouth when you are sleeping. Misinformation about spiders in the popular media and on the World Wide Web is rampant, leading to distorted perceptions and negative feelings about spiders. Despite these negative feelings, however, spiders offer intrigue and mystery and can be used to effectively engage even arachnophobic individuals.
    [Show full text]