A Bibliometric Analysis of Annales Geophysicae (2011-2015): an International Online Journal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Bibliometric Analysis of Annales Geophysicae (2011-2015): an International Online Journal International Journal of Information Movement Vol.2 Issue XI (March 2018) IFSIJ Impact Factor : 1.575 Website: www.ijim.in ISSN: 2456-0553 (online) Pages 194-202 A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE (2011-2015): AN INTERNATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL Christo Somi, Librarian Ammini College of Engineering, Palakkad, Kerala E mail: [email protected] Deepa John, Faculty, Dept. Library and Information Science, S. B. College, Changanacherry, Kerala E mail: [email protected] Yamuna P.B, Faculty, Dept. Library and Information Science, S. B. College, Changanacherry, Kerala E mail: [email protected] Abstract: This paper analyses different bibliometric feature of Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO), an international, multi- and inter-disciplinary scientific open-access journal in the field of Solar–terrestrial physics for the period 2011-2015.The data were downloaded from the journals website. The analysis covers mainly the number of contributions, authorship pattern, pattern of citations, most prolific authors etc. The results show that the growth pattern of the journal is inconsistent and it is decreased considerably in recent years when compared to 2011. An increasing trend in collaboration among the researchers has been observed in the scientific disciplines. Analysis of contribution of 60 volumes of the journal shows that it covers contributions related to nearly all aspects of Solar Terrestrial Physics. Keywords: Bibliometrics, Annales Geophysicae, Solar Terrestrial physics. 1.0 Introduction: Journals play leading role for the dissemination of information by providing up to date development of researches. It acts as a communication link between the researchers and the common man. Scholarly journals of a country reflect the quantity of research being carried out in that parts of the world.1 Due to the escalating cost of the periodicals and lack of sufficient library budgets the selection of any specific journal for a library should be done more carefully. Therefore, the library authorities are compelled to cut down the number of journal subscriptions. In this scenario most of the libraries turn to use peer reviewed open access journal to solve this problem. Open access has brought in new vistas for the dissemination of scholarly content. Today, world over scholarly content in various forms is distributed online on internet, free of charge and free from copy right and licensing restrictions by publishers, institutions and individuals.2 Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO) is an international, multi- and inter-disciplinary scientific open-access journal in the field of Solar–terrestrial physics. It is published by European Geosciences Union. The periodicity of this journal is monthly. ANGEO publishes original articles and short communications (letters) in the sciences of the Sun–Earth system, including the science of space weather, the solar–terrestrial plasma physics, and the Earth's atmosphere. „Annales Geophysicae‟ makes available full text research articles from 1994(vol.12) to the present. This journal is one of the primarily publication in the field of Solar-terrestrial physics. The present study attempts to measure the pattern of publication of „Annales Geophysicae‟ (ANGEO) from 2011 to 2015. 2.0 Objectives The main objectives of the study are as follows: 1. To examine the number of contribution and the pattern of growth of articles published in „Annales Geophysicae‟ during 2011 to 2015. 2. To identify the authorship pattern and degree of collaboration. 3. To examine the length of articles. 4. To find the year wise distribution of citation. 194 | P a g e Christo Somi, Deepa John and Yamuna P.B - A Bibliometric Analysis of Annales Geophysicae (2011-2015): An International Online Journal International Journal of Information Movement Vol.2 Issue XI (March 2018) IFSIJ Impact Factor : 1.575 Website: www.ijim.in ISSN: 2456-0553 (online) Pages 194-202 5. To identify the most prolific author and their work affiliation. 6. To identify the subject dispersion in articles published in „Annales Geophysicae‟ during 2011 to 2015. 7. To identify the productivity of highly prolific organisation and; 8. Country-wise affiliation of articles. 3.0 Review of Literature Fiala and Willett (2015) investigated the development of research in computer science in 15 Eastern European countries following the breaching of the Berlin Wall in 1989.The authors conducted a bibliometric analysis of 82,121 computer science publications indexed in the Web of Science database and investigated publication, citation, and collaboration patterns of the individual countries. Results shows that Poland has been the most productive country, followed by Russia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, and Slovenia. Publication rates have increased substantially over the period, but this has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in the quality of the publications. Hungary and Slovenia are the most influential countries in terms of citations per paper. Artificial Intelligence is the most frequently occurring computer science subject category, with Interdisciplinary Applications the category with the greatest impact. Zhu, Qiaoli, et al.(2015) determined the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The investigators identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Maharana, Rabindra K.(2014) analyzed Indian researcher‟s publications on malaria research and to serve as a guide to libraries needing to collect information on malariaFor the purpose of the study Indian researchers‟ publication data which were indexed in Thomson Reuters Web of Science (WoS) were used. The present study found out 2,020 documents with h-index of 48, published by Indian researchers which were indexed in WoS during 2003 to 2012 and the majority of them were articles (81.43 percent). Malaria Journal is the most favored research journal among the Indian research community which covers 97 papers. A.P. Dash contributed maximum number of 136 (6.74 percent) papers. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is the largest Indian funding agency with 184 (9.11 percent) research grants. Limitation by geographical area and time, i.e. the study only focuses the research publication of Indian researchers on malaria research during 2003 to 2012. Tsay, Ming-yueh (2013) made an attempt to explore the knowledge input and the subject relationship with other disciplines for the domain of information science through a citation analysis, from the references of each article from 1998 to 2008, of four leading information science journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Information Processing and Management, Journal of Information Science, and Journal of Documentation. The Ulrich‟s Periodical Directory, Library of Congress Subject Heading, retrieved from the World Cat and LISA database were used to identify the main class, subclass and subject of cited journals and books. The study reveals the highly cited subjects of LIS journals encompass searching, online information retrieval, information work, subject indexing, World Wide Web, technical services, citation analysis, information seeking behaviour, etc. The three most cited LCSH subjects on World Cat of books are information storage and retrieval, information science, human-computer interaction, etc. 4.0 Scope All journal issues from 2011-2015 were examined page by page. For each volume full length scholarly papers including research articles and review articles were identified. Other types of materials such as (obituaries, letters, announcements, news item, committee reports, and features) were excluded in the analysis. The commentaries on a particular article written by many author were counted as one article. This study ignores the native country of authors and country wise distribution of articles only based on country on which the authors affiliated organisation is situated. 195 | P a g e Christo Somi, Deepa John and Yamuna P.B - A Bibliometric Analysis of Annales Geophysicae (2011-2015): An International Online Journal International Journal of Information Movement Vol.2 Issue XI (March 2018) IFSIJ Impact Factor : 1.575 Website: www.ijim.in ISSN: 2456-0553 (online) Pages 194-202 5.0 Methodology The present study tries to find out the literature growth, authorship and collaboration pattern, average length of articles, most prolific organisation etc., in the „Annales Geophysicae‟. 5 volumes (Vol. No. 29 to 33) of Annales Geophysicae, published between 2011 to 2015 containing 60 issues have been taken into consideration for the present study. The source data was downloaded from http//:www.ann-geophys.net. The data was processed on MS Excel sheets. Data was analysed to meet the objectives mentioned above. Complete count method
Recommended publications
  • EGU)Published with It’S Partner Copernicus •Rapid Access Peer-Review → Publication As Discussion Paper Publishing
    OpenOpen AccessAccess PublishingPublishing atat thethe EuropeanEuropean GeosciencesGeosciences UnionUnion est. 2002 I.I. IntroductionIntroduction III.III. InnovativeInnovative ApproachApproach toto PublishingPublishing This poster introduces the 14 Open Access Publications of the European Public Peer-Review and Interactive Public Discussion (see Box II) Geosciences Union (EGU)published with it’s partner Copernicus •Rapid access peer-review → publication as discussion paper Publishing. It briefly describes the EGU (II), it’s innovative publishing •Interactive public discussion: published referee comment, author approach (III), the 14 journals of the union (IV), along with comments & comments of the scientific community dissemination and archives of the journals (V) and ends with a •Paper revision & final acceptance → publication as final revised paper summary (VI). Box I provides an overview. Publication Strategy •Rigorous Peer-Review: ≥2 BoxBox I:I: QuickQuick FactsFacts II.II. TheThe EuropeanEuropean GeosciencesGeosciences UnionUnion independent referees •14 peer-reviewed open access •Immediate Open Access to all articles journals (IV) published by EGU The European Geosciences Union (EGU) is Europe’s premier geo- •Page charge waiver for first 3 years of •Authors & editors from >69 sciences union, dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the geosciences a journal countries and the planetary and space sciences for the benefit of •Moderate page charges for authors •95,000 Pages published in 2010 humanity,worldwide. afterwards •Free access to all articles The EGU has over 11,000 members, a General Assembly with over •No extra charges for illustrations in •Interactive public peer-review 10,000 scientists each year, a diverse portfolio of 14 scientific journals colour etc. & discussion (Box II) that use an innovative “open access” format (III&IV), a number of •Author copyright under the Creative •Signatory of the Berlin thematic meetings, and education and outreach activities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Online & Open Access Publishing: Doubts and Advantages
    Online & Open Access Publishing: Doubts and Advantages Arne K. Richter Copernicus Gesellschaft e.V. and Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung December 2004 Copernicus Gesellschaft e.V. 1 Reasons for Publishing in "classical" Journals Aims & Scope Content of paper matches with Journal's Aims & Scope Peer-Review All papers undergo a rigorous peer-review process prior to publication Citation Index Journal is listed by ISI in the Citation Index Impact Factor The Impact Factor of the Journal is high Competent Editors Editors (and Referees) are of high scientific standing Fast Publication The review and publication process is fast (few months) High Dissemination The Journal is international and well spread amongst colleagues Accessibility The Journal is also accessible online (on the web) Free Publication No charges for authors for publication and/or colour illustrations Competent Publisher Publisher is strong in marketing & promotion Archiving Publication is on paper and archived (Copyright Libraries) Copernicus Gesellschaft e.V. 2 1 Criticism against "Classical" Publishing Publication Process The review, typesetting & editing and production processes are too long too long ("old" technologies and subscription regulations) Publication charges Normal: High subscription rates too high AGU: High page charges, high extra charges for colour illustrations and high subscription charges ("old" technologies and optimizing incomes) Decreasing Decrease in subscriptions by 2-10% per year. Total abort of Dissemination subscriptions by universities and institutions Copyright Prevents free distribution of scientific information , even for scientific purposes No Open-Access Even electronic copy of journal only free for subscribers or payment online Unfair Refereeing Only one “real” referee; poor referees’ reports; no relevance to the issues raised in the paper; personal insults; fraudulent delay of reports Copernicus Gesellschaft e.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Research in Earth Sciences in Norway
    Research in Earth Sciences in Norway Bibliometric analysis Evaluation Division for Science Research in Earth Sciences in Norway Bibliometric analysis Evaluation Division for Science © The Research Council of Norway 2011 The Research Council of Norway P.O.Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 OSLO Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 Telefax: +47 22 03 70 01 [email protected] www.forskningsradet.no/english The report can be ordered at: www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner or green number telefax: +47 800 83 001 Design cover: Design et cetera AS Photo: Tom Andersen Printing: 07 Gruppen AS Number of copies: 300 Oslo, November 2011 ISBN 978-82-12-03005-3 (printed version) ISBN 978-82-12-03006-0 (pdf) Evaluation of Earth Sciences – Publication and Citation Analysis National Indicators and International Comparisons Institutional Analyses Dag W. Aksnes & Antje Klitkou May 2011 2 Preface This report presents a bibliometric analysis of research in earth sciences and is a background report of the evaluation of the discipline. The report is written on the commission of the Research Council of Norway by senior researcher Dr. Dag W. Aksnes (project leader) and senior researcher Dr. Antje Klitkou at the Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU). 3 4 Contents Preface..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kein Folientitel
    Verbessserung wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation & Qualitätssicherung durch Open Access Publishing Ulrich Pöschl Max Planck Institut für Chemie, Abteilung Biogeochemie Becherweg 27, D-55128 Mainz [email protected] Die Digitale Herausforderung - Nutzung elektronsicher Ressourcen im universitären Umfeld Universitätsbibliothek Stuttgart, 26 Oktober 2005 EGU Outline Motivation ¾ open access perspectives & challenges Interactive Open Access Publishing: Public Peer Review & Interactive Discussion ¾ principles & effects Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics (ACP) and the European Geosciences Union (EGU) ¾ organisation, aims & achievements Summary & Outlook ¾ EGU interactive open access concept ¾ alternatives & future developments ¾ conclusions, vision & propositions EGU Motivation for Open Access Scientific, economic & educational advantages of free online availability of scientific research publications Educational: ¾ information & stimulation for students & general public ¾ equal opportunities in the information society (global & social) Economic: ¾ liberation of distorted scientific information market ¾ resolution of serial & budget crisis at university & research libraries Scientific: ¾ enhancement of research impact & productivity ¾ improvement of quality assurance: bigger need, larger gain and higher importance than “mere increase of impact & productivity” ¾ promotion of scientific progress EGU Open Access & Quality Assurance 1. We expect that the transition to open access will enhance the quality assurance and evaluation of scholarly
    [Show full text]
  • Open Peer Review: the Current Landscape and Emerging Models
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange School of Information Sciences -- Faculty Publications and Other Works School of Information Sciences 2019 Open Peer Review: The Current Landscape and Emerging Models Dietmar Wolfram University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee School of Information Studies, [email protected] Peiling Wang University of Tennessee - Knoxville School of Information Sciences, [email protected] Hyoungjoo Park University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee School of Information Studies, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_infosciepubs Part of the Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Recommended Citation Dietmar Wolfram, Peiling Wang, & Hyoungjoo Park (2019) Open peer review: the current landscape and emerging models. In Proceedings of the The 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (September 2-5, 2019, Rome, Italy) This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Information Sciences at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Information Sciences -- Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Open Peer Review: The Current Landscape and Emerging Models Dietmar Wolfram1, Peiling Wang2 and Hyoungjoo Park3 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] School of Information Studies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA 2 [email protected] School of Information Sciences University of Tennessee, Knoxville Knoxville, TN 37996, USA Abstract Open peer review (OPR) is an important innovation in the open science movement. OPR can play a significant role in advancing scientific communication by increasing its transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Peer Review & Interactive Discussion
    Open Access, Public Peer Review and Interactive Discussion for Improved Scientific Communication & Quality Assurance Ulrich Pöschl European Geosciences Union, Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics www.atmos-chem-phys.org Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany [email protected] IFQ –DFG Workshop “Peer Review Revisited“ WZB Berlin, 16 May 2006 EGU Outline Scientific Quality Assurance & Open Access ¾ perspectives & challenges Interactive Open Access Publishing & Collaborative Peer Review ¾ concepts & effects Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics (ACP) & European Geosciences Union (EGU) ¾ aims & achievements Alternative Concepts & Future Developments ¾ combination & integration Conclusions ¾ vision & propositions EGU Motivation for Open Access Scientific, educational & economic advantages of free online availability of scientific research publications Educational: ¾ information & stimulation for students & general public ¾ equal opportunities in the information society (global & social) Economic: ¾ liberation of distorted scientific information market ¾ resolution of serial & budget crisis at university & research libraries Scientific: ¾ enhancement of research impact & productivity ¾ improvement of quality assurance: bigger need, larger gain and higher importance than “mere increase of impact & productivity” EGU Open Access & Quality Assurance 1. We expect that the transition to open access will enhance the quality assurance and evaluation of scholarly output. This will be a direct consequence of the free availability of information. 2. In disciplines where peer-review is a cornerstone of the scientific information system, open-access publishing has demonstrated the same standards as traditional publishing. We foresee that open access will allow the development of even more effective peer-review by • allowing interactive forms of review and discussion, • permitting more efficient and more inclusive selection of referees, and • giving referees more information with which to do their work.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Mann Ingrid ▪ Jacobi Christoph ▪ Daglis A
    Editors-in-chief ▪ Ioannis A. Daglis ▪ Christoph Jacobi ▪ Ingrid Mann [email protected] eISSN 1432-0576 | ISSN 0992-7689 www.annales-geophysicae.net @EGU_ANGEO Annales Geophysicae Sun, Earth, planets, and planetary systems → Impact Factor: 1.585 (2018) ANGEO → on average 153 days from submission to publication (2019) → indexed in the Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), Current Contents, Scopus, GeoBase, Chemical Abstracts, DOAJ, and others An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union → archived in Portico & CLOCKSS Copernicus Publications Bahnhofsallee 1e 37081 Göttingen Germany Phone: +49 551 90 03 39 0 Fax: +49 551 90 03 39 70 [email protected] https://publications.copernicus.org/ Image credits: Aurora Over Alaska: Joshua Strang, USAF, public domain, | 5 months to publish via Wikimedia Commons Planets and Solar Wind: Fabio Crameri, CEED, Oslo Magnetosphere and magnetotail: http://history.nasa.gov/ EP-177/ch3-4.html IF: 1.585 www.annales-geophysicae.net Astronaut photograph STS107-E-5311: NASA Interactive Public Peer ReviewTM ▪ manuscript posted in the ANGEO discussion forum ▪ public discussion by the scientific community ▪ open access to referee reports ▪ post-discussion editor decision ▪ authors’ revision and peer-review completion ▪ final journal publication – fully peer-reviewed Referees 1. Submission 2. Access review 5 3. Technical corrections 4. MS posted in ANGEOD forum 5. Public discussion Referee 6. Final response comments
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Publishing at the European Geosciences Union Philippe Courtial, Pascale Talour
    Open Access Publishing at the European Geosciences Union Philippe Courtial, Pascale Talour To cite this version: Philippe Courtial, Pascale Talour. Open Access Publishing at the European Geosciences Union. 2011. sic_00655557 HAL Id: sic_00655557 https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00655557 Submitted on 30 Dec 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. OpenOpen AccessAccess PublishingPublishing atat thethe EuropeanEuropean GeosciencesGeosciences UnionUnion est. 2002 I.I. IntroductionIntroduction III.III. InnovativeInnovative ApproachApproach toto PublishingPublishing This poster introduces the 14 Open Access Publications of the European Public Peer-Review and Interactive Public Discussion (see Box II) Geosciences Union (EGU)published with it’s partner Copernicus •Rapid access peer-review → publication as discussion paper Publishing. It briefly describes the EGU (II), it’s innovative publishing •Interactive public discussion: published referee comment, author approach (III), the 14 journals of the union (IV), along with comments & comments
    [Show full text]
  • Journal List of Scopus.Xlsx
    Sourcerecord id Source Title (CSA excl.) (Medline-sourced journals are indicated in Green). Print-ISSN Including Conference Proceedings available in the scopus.com Source Browse list 16400154734 A + U-Architecture and Urbanism 03899160 5700161051 A Contrario. Revue interdisciplinaire de sciences sociales 16607880 19600162043 A.M.A. American Journal of Diseases of Children 00968994 19400157806 A.M.A. archives of dermatology 00965359 19600162081 A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology 00965979 19400157807 A.M.A. archives of industrial health 05673933 19600162082 A.M.A. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Medicine 00966703 19400157808 A.M.A. archives of internal medicine 08882479 19400158171 A.M.A. archives of neurology 03758540 19400157809 A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry 00966886 19400157810 A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology 00966339 19400157811 A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology 00966894 19400157812 A.M.A. archives of pathology 00966711 19400157813 A.M.A. archives of surgery 00966908 5800207606 AAA, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 01715410 28033 AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication 07434618 50013 AACE International. Transactions of the Annual Meeting 15287106 19300156808 AACL Bioflux 18448143 4700152443 AACN Advanced Critical Care 15597768 26408 AACN clinical issues 10790713 51879 AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing 10467467 26729 AANA Journal 00946354 66438 AANNT journal / the American Association of Nephrology Nurses and Technicians 07441479 5100155055 AAO Journal 27096 AAOHN
    [Show full text]
  • Scopus Journal Impact Factor 2008
    Scopus Journal Impact Factor 2008 Title ISSN SJR H index Total Docs. Total Total Refs. Total Cites Citable Cites / Doc. Ref. / Doc. Country (2008) Docs. (3years) Docs. (2years) (3years) (3years) 1 Annual Review of Immunology 15453278 16.204 179 24 81 4,258 3,608 81 39.46 177.42 United States 2 Cell 10974172 12.802 431 535 1,570 18,726 32,388 1,023 31.86 35 United States 3 Annual Review of Biochemistry 15454509 11.602 165 31 91 4,666 3,026 91 30.25 150.52 United States 4 CaA Cancer Journal for Clinicians 15424863 11.331 69 34 118 1,848 4,772 62 76.78 54.35 United States 5 Nature Genetics 10614036 10.63 311 327 962 7,048 17,487 638 29.07 21.55 United Kingdom 6 Annual Review of Cell and 15308995 9.494 124 25 82 3,297 2,077 80 23.04 131.88 United States Developmental Biology 7 Nature Immunology 15292916 8.592 184 236 703 8,140 10,520 516 17.5 34.49 United Kingdom 8 Cancer Cell 15356108 8.533 127 128 373 4,377 6,252 230 26.4 34.2 United States 9 Immunity 10974180 8.372 212 219 553 9,275 7,479 399 19.18 42.35 United States 10 Annual Review of Neuroscience 15454126 8.205 128 23 61 3,382 1,763 61 27.48 147.04 United States 11 Nature reviews. Molecular cell 14710080 7.671 178 206 509 9,662 9,275 440 18.44 46.9 United Kingdom 12 Physiological Reviews 15221210 7.09 183 40 99 16,536 3,577 98 36.52 413.4 United States 13 Nature 14764687 6.727 599 2,345 7,650 35,846 87,871 3,672 25.05 15.29 United Kingdom 14 Cell Stem Cell 19345909 6.683 27 182 95 5,376 780 55 14.18 29.54 United States 15 Annual Review of Genetics 15452948 6.306 98 30 65 4,367 1,163
    [Show full text]