DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-12 P-11 Newberg Dundee Bypass N-144 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-12 Tier 2 DEIS Comment and Responses Submittal: P-12 Type: Comment Form Name: Elizabeth Cruz Title: Citizen Business/Affi liation: Address: 1519 11th Street Newberg, OR 97132 Response to Comment: ODOT appreciates Ms. Cruz’s comments on Design Option 5.2D in Segment 5 and on the project as a whole. ODOT included this design option in the Preferred Alternative, as discussed in the Tier 2 FEIS. This design option will leave 11th Street open and reduce impacts to the neighborhood. Newberg Dundee Bypass N-145 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-12 Newberg Dundee Bypass N-146 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-13 Tier 2 DEIS Comment and Responses Submittal: P-13 Type: Individual Testimony Name: Marcelo Cruz Title: Citizen Business/Affi liation: Address: 1519 11th Street Newberg, OR 97132 Response to Comment: ODOT appreciates Mr. Cruz’s support for the project, which will reduce congestion and improve access to Oregon 99W throughout the project area. Newberg Dundee Bypass N-147 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-14 Nivel 2 DEIS Comentario y Respuestas Entrega: P-14 Tipo: Comment Form Nombre: Marcelo Cruz Title: Ciudadano Negocio/Afi liación: Dirección: 1519 11th Street Newberg, OR 97132 Respuesta al Comentario: ODOT reconoce la preferencia del Sr. Cruz por la Opción de Diseño 5.1C.2 del Segmento 5. La Alternativa Preferida incluye la Opción de Diseño 5.2D en el Segmento 5. ODOT seleccionó esta opción por las siguientes razones: Las Opciones de Diseño 5.1C.2 y 5.1D.2 quitarían 56 residencias cada una, mientras que la Opción de Diseño 5.2D quitaría 48 residencias. Las Opciones de Diseño 5.1C.2 y la 5.1D.2 desplazarían unidades residenciales en ambos lados de la calle 11 entre las calles Columbia Street y Wynooski Street y cerraría la calle 11. La Opción de Diseño 5.2D desplazaría unidades residenciales sólo en el lado sur de la calle 11 y mantendría la calle 11 abierta al tránsito. El alineamiento de la Opción de Diseño 5.2D impactaría más la propiedad de la SP Newsprint, reduciendo los impactos residenciales y del vecindario. Con esta Opción de Diseño, podría ocurrir uno que Newberg Dundee Bypass N-148 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-14 otro desplazamiento de las estructuras y establecimientos de la SP Newsprint; sin embargo, éstas podrían ser trasladadas a algún otro lugar en terreno de la SP Newsprint. La Opción de Diseño 5.2D está a nivel alto. La opción completamente hundida, la Opción de Diseño 5.1C.2, tendría costos de construcción cerca del doble de los costos de la opción recomendada (5.2D) debido a la problemática asociada con el desagüe de la opción completamente hundida. Response to Comment: ODOT acknowledges Mr. Cruz’s preference on the Design Option 5.1C.2 in Segment 5. The Preferred Alternative includes Design Option 5.2D in Segment 5. ODOT selected this option for the following reasons. Design Options 5.1C.2 and 5.1D.2 would each remove 56 residences, while Design Option 5.2D would remove 48 residences. Design Options 5.1C.2 and 5.1D.2 would displace residential units on both sides of 11th Street between Columbia Street and Wynooski Street and would close 11th Street. Design Option 5.2D would displace residential units only on the south side of 11th Street and keep 11th Street open to traffi c. Design Option 5.2D alignment impacts more of the SP Newsprint property, reducing residential and neighborhood impacts. With this design option, some displacement of SP Newsprint structures and facilities could occur; however, these can be relocated elsewhere on SP Newsprint property. Design Options 5.2D is above-grade. The fully depressed option, Design Option 5.1C.2, would have construction costs that are about twice as much as the recommended option (5.2D) due to related dewatering issues associated with the fully depressed option. Newberg Dundee Bypass N-149 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses Racheal Jones P-15 From: Donna Robinson Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 9:57 AM To: Racheal Jones Subject: FW: Public Comments RE: Dundee/Dayton Bypass 222220'%',* #11%#22222 0-+/+#1_'+W+'*2-/+#100^-"-20122#0-0031X #,2/ -,"7-3*7- /' Tier 2 DEIS Comment and Responses -/('**'+)'8.,-,,- ',1-,.+'*7 -1&-$1)7 )!/' ',2#**73.4 5-",#7_-" 3 (#!2/(/3 *'!)-++#,21/,3,"##I,72-,87.11 :; Submittal: P-15 222220'%',* #11%#22222 0-+/5'!-*#<38+,)-* 30,W+'*2-/!*,1)#)1'^7&--0!-+X #,2/230"7-3*7- / -/+#1_'+ Type: Email 3 (#!2/3 *'!)-++#,21/,3,"##I,72-,87.11 Name: Nicole Guzman Colburn and Chris Colburn ,#0 00-22#0- 7&31 ,",";22#,"#"2&#.3 *'!+##2',%22&#5#5 #0%4'%&1!&--*-,3,#- 0 '$2#01.#)',%5'2&1#4#0*.#-.*#,"0#4'#5',%2&#.0-4'"#"+2#0'*1'2 #!+#!*#02&2 Title: Citizens ,-20$$'!123"'#1&4# ##,"-,#0#%0"',%#62#,"',%20#"#0"0',2&#$'0121#%+#,2-$2&# .0-.-1#" 7.11 3'*"',%.*,10'15#122#"2&2#4#,',%-*-!*0#1'"#,21!300#,2*731# 20#"#0"02-!!#115#12 -3,"457$0-+45712&#0#'1,--.2'-,2-"-1-2&#!300#,2 Business/Affi liation: 572&#&'%&5710#1#23.03-!*0#1'"#,21*1-31#20#"#0"02-!!#11457 $0-+4571-12-4-'"2&#!300#,212-.1'%,,"20$$'! !)3.11-!'2#"5'2&2&2 !!#11.-',20'15#1##'2-2&#!300#,2.*,1!**',%$-0!-,,#!2',%20#"#0"0',2- -,#!-+.*#2#0-","2-2&#',2#0!&,%#5'**-,*7',!0#1#2&#20$$'!-,-300-"2-4-'" Address: 15500 SE Kreder Rd. &4',%2-31#2&#',2#0!&,%#0(#0#/3#122&2123"'#1 #"-,#2-*'+'22&#$3230#.-2#,2'* 20$$'!-300-"5'**1##-,!#2&'1',2#0!&,%#'1 3'*20 Dayton, OR 97114 #1.#!2$3**7- 5'!-*#<38+,)-* 30,,")&0'1)-* 30, 20#"#0"0 ,72-,- Response to Comment: ODOT appreciates the Colburn’s comments concerning Kreder Road. Currently, Kreder Road is being used as a cut-through movement by eastbound traffi c on Oregon 18 that would otherwise be turning left on Oregon 99W heading toward McMinnville. Kreder Road is also used as a cut-through by eastbound traffi c on Oregon 99W that would otherwise be turning right (or westbound) on Oregon 18. With construction of the Bypass, the Oregon 18/Kreder Road intersection will be closed. All traffi c on Oregon 99W and Oregon 18 will use the Dayton interchange. Direct access to Oregon 18 will not be possible from Kreder Road after the Bypass is constructed, thereby eliminating the potential to make either of the “cut-through” movements mentioned in the comment. Newberg Dundee Bypass N-150 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses Your comment also mentions that Kreder Road would be connected to the Dayton Interchange and that would increase traffi c on Kreder Road. ODOT selected the design option that connects Kreder Road to Ferry Street in Dayton via a new bridge over the Yamhill River. As a result, traffi c to and from the Dayton Interchange will not have direct access to Kreder Road. ODOT does not see a reason to conduct traffi c studies on Kreder Road because, after the Bypass is constructed, traffi c on Oregon 18 will not have direct access to Kreder Road and Kreder Road will not connected to the Dayton interchange. Newberg Dundee Bypass N-151 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-16 Tier 2 DEIS Comment and Responses Submittal: P-16 Type: Hearing Testimony Name: Ted Crawford Title: Citizen Business/Affi liation: Address: 876 SW View Crest Drive Dundee, OR 97115 Response to Comment: ODOT appreciates Mr. Crawford’s support for the Newberg Dundee Bypass project. The project will relieve congestion on Oregon 99W through Dundee, improve safety and generally benefi t economic development. Newberg Dundee Bypass N-152 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-17 Tier 2 DEIS Comment and Responses Submittal: P-17 Type: Hearing Testimony Name: Marc Dochez Title: Citizen Business/Affi liation: Address: PO Box 4 Dundee, OR 97115 Response to Comment: ODOT appreciates Mr. Dochez’s suggested changes to the proposed interchange at Oregon 99W and the East Dundee Connector Road and his stated preference for local circulation option 7.5C. ODOT did not examine the addition of an eastbound on-ramp and a westbound off-ramp during project development because the signalized intersection at Oregon 99W and East Dundee Connector Road would operate at a very good level of service in the year 2030 and the ramps would be very costly. Adding an eastbound on-ramp and a westbound off-ramp would: Require constructing the ramps on structure parallel to Oregon 99W and next to the Willamette and Pacifi c Railroad (WPRR) right of way, Newberg Dundee Bypass N-153 Tier 2 FEIS Appendix N: Public Comments and Responses P-17 Require additional right of way and property acquisition from businesses near Dundee and could impact the WPRR, Require a wider structure over 99W and additional lanes on the East Dundee Connector Road for merge lanes, Interfere with traffi c operation at the new Dayton Avenue-Fox Farm Road intersection, Increase project costs. From a traffi c operation standpoint, the signalized intersection at Oregon 99W and East Dundee Connector Road is forecast to operate at a volume-to-capacity ratio of approximately 0.90 in the year 2035. ODOT agrees with Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maryland Transportation Authority; Toll Roads Bridges
    Summary: Maryland Transportation Authority; Toll Roads Bridges Primary Credit Analyst: Kayla Smith, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4450; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Joseph J Pezzimenti, New York (1) 212-438-2038; [email protected] Table Of Contents Rating Action Negative Outlook Related Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JUNE 8, 2020 1 Summary: Maryland Transportation Authority; Toll Roads Bridges Credit Profile US$316.0 mil transp facs proj rev bnds ser 2020 due 07/01/2050 Long Term Rating AA-/Negative New Maryland Transportation Authority Long Term Rating AA-/Negative Affirmed Rating Action S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'AA-' long-term rating to the Maryland Transportation Authority's (MDTA) pro forma $316 million series 2020 transportation facilities projects (TFPs) revenue bonds. At the same time, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'AA-' long-term rating on MDTA's existing TFP revenue bonds. The outlook is negative. The series 2020 bond proceeds will fund near-term capital projects and replenish cash reserves to $400 million by June 30, 2020. The loss of net revenues available for capital spending due to lower traffic levels from the COVID-19 outbreak and associated impacts caused the MDTA to use some of its unrestricted cash reserves. Net revenue from the facilities designated TFPs under the trust agreement secure the bonds. These TFPs currently include the JFK Memorial Highway (Interstate 95 [I-95]), the Fort McHenry Tunnel (I-95), the William Preston Lane, Jr. Memorial Bridge (U.S. Route 50/301), the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel (I-895), the Francis Scott Key Bridge (I-695), the Governor Harry W.
    [Show full text]
  • MUIRKIRK ROAD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Draft Environmental Impact Statement June 2021
    U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION MUIRKIRK ROAD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Draft Environmental Impact Statement June 2021 Prepared by: In cooperation with: This page left intentionally blank. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT | FDA MUIRKIRK ROAD CAMPUS MASTER PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FDA Muirkirk Road Campus Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Agency: U.S. General Services Administration National Capital Region 1800 F Street, NW Washington, DC 20405 In cooperation with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are studying the potential impacts that would result from the implementation of a Master Plan to accommodate future growth and further consolidate FDA operations at the Muirkirk Road Campus (MRC) in Laurel, Maryland. The Master Plan would provide a framework for development at the MRC to accommodate up to 1,800 FDA employees and support staff. This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analyzes the impacts of the No-Action Alternative and three Action Alternatives. Questions or comments on the Draft EIS should be addressed to: Mr. Marshall Popkin U.S. General Services Administration National Capital Region 1800 F Street, NW Room 4400 Washington, DC 20405 [email protected] Written comments on the Draft EIS must be postmarked by July 19, 2021. If you wish to comment on the Draft EIS, you may submit comments electronically or directly by mail. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment – including your personal identifying information – may be made public at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Route 200 Opens November 22 by 0600Hrs
    Maryland Route 200 Opens November 22 by 0600hrs Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 The Yellow Highlighted Section is ClOCurrently Open Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 The Green Section Will Open Nb22November 22nd andLikd Link to I-95 Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Interchanges • The temppyorary ram p at Norbeck Rd is closed • Full interchanges at: – Layhill Rd – New Hampshire Ave – Route 29 – I-95 • Partial interchange at Briggs Chaney Rd: – From Briggs Chaney to E200 towards I-95 – From W200 onto Briggs Chaney (from I-95) Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Route 29 Interchange with MD 200 Orange sections are elevated Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Station 15’s access to E200 or W200: Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Route 29 / MD200 Interchange (from Stat ion 15 ’s perspect ive ) Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Partial Ramp System at Briggs Chaney Rd - W200 can exit at Briggs Chaney Rd - Briggs Chaney Rd can access E200 TITo I-95 Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Turning Around at I-95 Stay left , go around the barricades Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Turning Around at I-95 • All lanes will move right – POV’s must take ramp to I-95 north or south • Stay to the left, go around barricade • Go over I-95, take Contee Rd exit, then take exit for Westbound 200 Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Water Supply Montgomery County Fire Rescue 2011 Water Supply • There are hydrants in the right-of-way (ROW) at: – Norbeck Rd – Longmead Crossing Dr – Layhill Rd – Bonifant Rd – Notley Rd – New
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Framework for Transit-Oriented Development (TOD)
    MD-13-SP209B4N James T. Smith Jr., Secretary Martin O’Malley, Governor Melinda B. Peters, Administrator Anthony G. Brown, Lt. Governor STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSIT- ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) CO-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Mansoureh Jeihani (Morgan State University) Lei Zhang (University of Maryland) Research Assistants Anam Ardeshiri, Arash Amiri, Babak Baghaei, Arefeh Nasri, Kiana Roshan Zamir Project Number SP209B4N FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 2013 The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Maryland State Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Development of a Framework for Transit-Oriented October 2013 Development (TOD) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author/s 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mansoureh Jeihani, Lei Zhang, Anam Ardeshiri, Arash Amiri, Arefeh Nasri, Kiana Roshan Zamir, Babak Baghaei 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Morgan State University 1700 E. Cold Spring Lane Baltimore, MD 21251 University of Maryland 1173 Glenn Martin Hall College Park, MD 20742 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 11. Contract or Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pricing and Technology Strategies to Address Congestion on and Financing of America’S Roads
    Pricing and Technology Strategies to Address Congestion on and Financing of America’s Roads Oregon’s Approach Testimony before the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure United States House of Representatives September 11, 2019 Travis Brouwer Assistant Director for Public Affairs Oregon Department of Transportation 1 Chairman DeFazio, Ranking Member Graves, Chair Norton, Ranking Member Davis, and other distinguished members of the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, thank you very much for the opportunity to appear before you today. My name is Travis Brouwer and I am the Assistant Director for Public Affairs at the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). I am here today to discuss tolling and congestion pricing on state highways in Oregon. Growing Congestion in Portland Pushes Oregon to Toll Today, Oregon is not a toll state. No state‐owned highway, bridge or tunnel is tolled, and this has been the case for decades. However, growing congestion in Portland led the Oregon Legislature in 2017 to direct ODOT to implement tolling on Interstate 5 and Interstate 205 in the Portland metro area. In the lead up to consideration of a major transportation funding bill, both a blue‐ribbon commission created by Oregon Governor Kate Brown and members of the state legislature embarked on statewide transportation listening tours. These efforts revealed that freeway congestion in the Portland metropolitan area is a statewide concern. Communities and businesses across the state, in many cases located hundreds of miles away from Portland, consistently reported struggles with getting products and people to and through the Portland area. Thanks to these listening tours, policymakers recognized that Portland congestion is an urban problem and a rural problem that must be addressed at a statewide level in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • OF MARYLAND Club Celebrates Arbor Day with Tree Planting New
    Leisure World News May 5, 2017 • Published Twice a Month • www.residents.lwmc.com/lwnews OF MARYLAND Board of Directors Club Celebrates Approves Resolutions Arbor Day with Tree by Maureen Freeman, upgrades. Leisure World News The existing game room, Planting which has several pool tables he Leisure World and a poker table, will convert Community Corporation to meeting room space and will T board of directors include new paint, a lighting approved several resolutions at upgrade and a room divider. its April 25 meeting. MedStar Lease Clubhouse II Renovations The board authorized Leisure The board approved a 2018 World general manager Kevin maintenance fund payment for Flannery to complete an oper- fitness center and game room ating agreement and lease with renovations in Clubhouse II. MedStar Health, which has With the projected August leased the medical center on completion of a new fitness North Leisure World Boulevard center in the clubhouse, the since 2013. existing fitness center will The proposed new lease become a game room with would run from January 2018 Garden and Environmental Club president Mary Ann Steele, left, and outgoing new carpet, paint and lighting ➤ to page 3 Club president Peggy Reynolds shovel mulch around a newly planted Bloodgood Japanese maple tree April 28. Photo by Stacy Smith, Leisure World News New MedStar Manager by Stacy Smith, Leisure World News real focal point, because every- body drives through here. The esident tree lovers and first thing they see is this area,” Focuses on Integrative guests joined the Garden said Aaron Tenley, grounds R and Environmental Club maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84051, * AUDUBON NATURALIST SOCIETY
    2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84051, * AUDUBON NATURALIST SOCIETY OF THE CENTRAL ATLANTIC STATES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. AW-06-3386, Civil Action No. AW-07-1480 (Consolidated) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, SOUTHERN DIVISION 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84051 November 8, 2007, Decided PRIOR HISTORY: Envtl. Def. v. United States DOT, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36059 (D.D.C., May 17, 2007) CORE TERMS: fhwa, conformity, transportation, environmental, corridor, highway, emission, epa, mitigation, monitor, qualitative, public interest, reasonable alternatives, planning, summary judgment, concentration, regional, quantitative, constructive, stream, transit, air, parkland, hot- spot, site, air quality, land use plans, traffic, proposed project, environmental impacts COUNSEL: [*1] For Audubon Naturalist Society of The Central Atlantic States, Inc., Maryland Native Plant Society, Inc., Roger Metcalf, Eve Burton, Plaintiffs: Timothy Joseph Sullivan , LEAD ATTORNEY, Brennan Sullivan and McKenna LLP, Greenbelt, MD; Langley Richard Shook , Peter Richard Steenland, William Eron Gerard , Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC. For Environmental Defense, Sierra Club, Inc., Consol Plaintiffs (8:06-cv-03386-AW): Erik Brandon Bluemel, Hope Madeline Babcock, LEAD ATTORNEYS, Institute for Public Representation, Washington, DC; Robert Edward Yuhnke , LEAD ATTORNEY,
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2019 Washington Metropolitan Region
    - Table of Contents - FY 2019 TDM Resource Guide and SMP ~ Section One ~ Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 4 Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 6 Regional Activity Centers……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 7 Mission Statement ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 11 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 12 Guiding Principles of Strategic Marketing Plan…………………………………………………………………Page 14 Key Findings and Strategic Implications……………………………………………………………………………Page 15 Summary of Adopted Strategy for FY 2019………………………………………………………………………Page 21 ~ Section Two ~ Regional Profile…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 27 Alternative Mode Profiles/Support Programs……………………………………………………………………Page 38 Carpools and Vanpools……………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 39 Transit………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 42 Table - Summary of Bus Activity………………………………………………………………………………………Page 45 Table - Summary of Rail Activity………………………………………………………………………………………Page 53 Telework……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…………Page 55 Bicycling/Walking……………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 58 Bike Sharing……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 63 Car Sharing………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 65 HOV Lanes/Express Lanes………………………………………………………………………………………………Page 67 Park & Ride Lots…………………………………………………………………………………………...…...……………Page 76 Guaranteed Ride Home………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 79 Commuter Benefit Programs…………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River County
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN HOOD RIVER COUNTY ADOPTED JULY 2003 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #249 AMENDED JUNE 26, 2009 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #295 AMENDED MARCH 31, 2010 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #299 AMENDED NOVEMBER 21, 2011 – COUNTY ORDINANCE #306 Prepared for Hood River County Prepared by Cogan Owens Cogan, LLC and David Evans and Associates, Inc. With assistance from Hood River County Departments of Community Development and Public Works Oregon Department of Transportation Hood River County Transportation System Plan Technical Advisory Committee This project was funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation and the Department of Land Conservation and Development. TGM grants rely on federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act and Oregon Lottery Funds. July 21, 2003 i-1 Hood River County Transportation System Plan HOOD RIVER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1997 Draft 2003 Update (Adopted) Hood River County (1997 + 2003) City of Hood River (1997 + 2003) City of Cascade Locks (1997 + 2003) Port of Hood River (1997 + 2003) Mt. Hood National Forest (1997 + 2003) Hood River County Transportation District (1997 + 2003) Hood River School District (1997 + 2003) Mt. Hood Railroad (1997 + 2003) Mt. Hood Meadows Ski Area (1997 + 2003) Hood River Valley Residents Committee (1997 + 2003) Hood River Chamber of Commerce (1997 + 2003) Oregon Department of Transportation (1997 + 2003) Transportation Growth Management (2003) Hood River
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Qualifications for Phase 1 of the I-495 & I
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR PHASE 1 OF THE I-495 & I-270 PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM THROUGH A PHASE PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT among the Maryland Transportation Authority and the Maryland Department of Transportation, including the State Highway Administration Issued: February 7, 2020 Statement of Qualification Due Date: April 22, 2020 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Page 2 MDOT and MDTA Request for Qualifications Phase 1 of the I-495 & I-270 P3 Program TABLE OF CONTENTS CLAUSE PAGE PART A – OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 6 1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 6 1.1 I-495 & I-270 P3 Program ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 Description of the Opportunity ................................................................................... 7 1.3 Scope of Work ......................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Solicitation Process ................................................................................................ 11 1.5 Solicitation Schedule .............................................................................................. 12 1.6 Administrative Matters ............................................................................................ 13 2. STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technical Report
    Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON, D.C. SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Appendix D.2 Transportation Technical Report Table of Contents Appendix D.2A Transportation ................................................................................................ A-1 D.2A.1 Transportation Components of Current, Future No-Build, and Future .......................... Build Conditions ...................................................................................................... A-1 D.2A.2 Transportation Network Component: SCMAGLEV - Future Build Condition ............ A-2 D.2A.3 Transportation Network Component: MARC Commuter Rail Current ........................... Condition Service Characteristics ............................................................................ A-5 D.2A.4 Transportation Network Component: Local Transit Systems within Affected Environment ......................................................................................................... A.4-9 D.2A.5 Transportation Network Component: Project Area Roadway Network ............... A.5-17 D.2A.6 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Camden Yards Alternative .................................................................. A.6-27 D.2A.7 Transportation Network Component: Station Area Street Network - ............................. Baltimore Cherry Hill Alternative ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA ______ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE and ) SIERRA CLUB, Inc., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Civil Action No
    Case 8:07-cv-01480-AW Document 39 Filed 06/05/07 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE and ) SIERRA CLUB, Inc., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Civil Action No. 06-2176 (GK) v. ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION The controversial proposed $2.45 billion, 18-mile, six-lane tolled highway Maryland Route 200 (the “Intercounty Connector” or “ICC Project”), if built, would connect Montgomery and Prince George’s counties in Maryland, and would pass through private property, parks and wetlands. Local debate about the ICC Project has persisted since it was first discussed in the 1950s. On May 29, 2006, the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”), through the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”), issued the Record of Decision (“ROD”) approving the ICC Project. This action arises out of that approval. Plaintiffs contend that by approving the ICC Project, Defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq.; the Federal Aid-Highways Act (“FAHA”), 23 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.; the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.; the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (“SAFETEA-LU”), 23 Case 8:07-cv-01480-AW Document 39 Filed 06/05/07 Page 2 of 19 U.S.C. § 134; the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.; and the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. This matter is now before the Court on the Motion to Transfer of Defendants DOT, Peters, FHWA and Capka [Dkt.
    [Show full text]