DOCSLIB.ORG

Appropriate Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appropriate Assessment West of England Joint Local Transport Plan 4 Habitats Regulations Assessment: Appropriate Assessment Date: 27th June 2019 Prepared by: ClearLead Consulting Limited The Barn, Cadhay, Ottery St Mary, Devon, EX11 1QT, UK 01404 814273 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Revision 4 Report Status V1 - DRAFT V2 - FINAL FOR V3 - FINAL FOR V4 - FINAL FOR V5 - FINAL FOR CONSULTATION CONSULTATION CONSULTATION CONSULTATION WITH MINOR WITH FURTHER WITH FURTHER EDITS EDITS EDITS Date 11/01/19 14/02/19 25/02/19 30/05/19 27/06/19 Prepared by H Torr / V Pearson H Torr / V H Torr / V H Torr / V H Torr / V Pearson Pearson Pearson Pearson Signature Checked by J Mitchell J Mitchell J Mitchell J Mitchell J Mitchell Signature Project number C0156 C0156 C0156 C0156 C0156 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared by ClearLead Consulting Limited solely for the use of the Client and those parties with whom a warranty agreement has been executed, or with whom an assignment has been agreed. Should any third party wish to use or rely upon the contents of the report, written approval must be sought from ClearLead Consulting Limited; a charge may be levied against such approval. ClearLead Consulting Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for: a) the consequences of this document being used for any purpose or project other than for which it was commissioned, and b) the use of this document by any third party with whom an agreement has not been executed. The work undertaken to provide the basis of this report comprised a study of available documented information from a variety of sources (including the Client) and discussions with relevant authorities and other interested parties. The opinions given in this report have been dictated by the finite data on which they are based and are relevant only to the purpose for which the report was commissioned. The information reviewed should not be considered exhaustive and has been accepted in good faith as providing true and representative data pertaining to site conditions. Should additional information become available which may affect the opinions expressed in this report, ClearLead Consulting Limited reserves the right to review such information and, if warranted, to modify the opinions accordingly. It should be noted that any recommendations identified in this report are based on information provided by the Client and as gathered during the site survey. In some cases access cannot be granted to all areas of the site, in these instances and in the absence of information to the contrary, ClearLead Consulting Limited will use the information provided to complete the report. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 This Report............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1 Evidence Gathering .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Screening ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Appropriate Assessment ................................................................................................. 26 2.1.4 Assessment Limitations .................................................................................................. 28 3 The West of England Joint Local Transport Plan 4 .......................................................................... 29 3.1 Contents of the Plan ............................................................................................................... 29 3.2 Relationship of the JLTP4 with the West of England JSP ......................................................... 33 4 Screening Findings ......................................................................................................................... 36 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 36 4.2 Screening Findings ................................................................................................................. 36 5 Appropriate Assessment: Loss of Supporting Sites for Bats associated with SACs ........................... 47 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 47 5.2 Background ............................................................................................................................ 48 5.3 Assessment of Effects Alone and In Combination with the JSP ................................................ 50 5.3.1 North Somerset and Mendip Bats SAC ............................................................................ 50 5.3.2 Assessment of effects on the North Somerset and Mendip Bats SAC in combination with the JSP 52 5.3.3 Assessment of effects on the Bath and Bradford-on-Avon Bats SAC ................................ 53 5.3.4 Assessment of effects on the Bath and Bradford-on-Avon SAC in combination with the JSP 55 5.4 Mitigation requirements ........................................................................................................ 55 5.4.1 Strategic mitigation ........................................................................................................ 55 5.4.2 Scheme level mitigation ................................................................................................. 56 5.4.3 Mitigation summary ....................................................................................................... 58 5.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 58 6 Appropriate Assessment: Loss of Supporting Sites for Birds ........................................................... 60 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 60 6.2 Background ............................................................................................................................ 60 6.4 Assessment of Effects............................................................................................................. 61 6.5 Assessment of effects in combination with the JSP ................................................................. 62 6.6 Mitigation requirements ........................................................................................................ 62 6.7 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 63 7 Appropriate Assessment: Coastal Squeeze ..................................................................................... 64 7.1 Introduction and Background ................................................................................................. 64 7.2 Assessment of effects alone and in combination with the JSP ................................................ 64 7.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 64 8 Appropriate Assessment: Increase in Recreational Pressures ......................................................... 65 8.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 65 8.2 Background ............................................................................................................................ 67 8.3 Assessment of Effects Alone and In Combination with the WoE JSP ....................................... 68 8.4 Mitigation requirements ........................................................................................................ 89 8.4.1 Strategic Mitigation ........................................................................................................ 89 8.4.2 Mitigation - Cycleways ................................................................................................... 91 8.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 92 9 Appropriate Assessment: Increase in Water Pollution and Marine Litter ........................................ 93 9.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 93 9.2 Background ............................................................................................................................ 93 9.2.1 Temporary Construction Effects ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pleistocene Rodents of the British Isles
    PLEISTOCENE RODENTS OF THE BRITISH ISLES BY ANTONY JOHN SUTCLIFFE British Museum (Natural History), London AND KAZIMIERZ KOWALSKI Institute of Systematic and Experimental Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland Pp. 31-147 ; 31 Text-figures ; 13 Tables BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) GEOLOGY Vol. 27 No. 2 LONDON: 1976 THE BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (natural history), instituted in 1949, is issued in five series corresponding to the Scientific Departments of the Museum, and an Historical series. Parts will appear at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three or four hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. In 1965 a separate supplementary series of longer papers was instituted, numbered serially for each Department. This paper is Vol. 27, No. 2, of the Geological [Palaeontological) series. The abbreviated titles of periodicals cited follow those of the World List of Scientific Periodicals. World List abbreviation : Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol. ISSN 0007-1471 Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 1976 BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) Issued 29 July, 1976 Price £7.40 . PLEISTOCENE RODENTS OF THE BRITISH ISLES By A. J. SUTCLIFFE & K. KOWALSKI CONTENTS Page Synopsis ........ 35 I. Introduction ....... 36 A. History of Studies ..... 37 B. The Geological Background .... 40 II. Localities in the British Isles with fossil rodents 42 A. Deposits OF East Anglia . .... 42 (i) Red Crag 43 (ii) Icenian Crag ....... 43 (iii) Cromer Forest Bed Series ..... 46 (a) Pastonian of East Runton and Happisburgh 47 (b) Beestonian ...... 48 (c) Cromerian, sensu stricto .... 48 (d) Anglian ......
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex-Cave-Club-Journal-Number
    January 1981 Vol. 16 No. 185 CONTENTS Page No. Editorial .................................................................................................................................. 115 Club News .............................................................................................................................. 115 Mendip Notes Wimblestone ................................................................................................. 116 Diary Dates ............................................................................................................................. 118 Primrose Pot – a short saga Alison Moody .......................................................................... 119 Some Mendip Water Traces 1970 – 1980 W.I. Stanton ....................................................... 120 Letter to the Editor Steve Gough .......................................................................................... 127 Letter From Canada P.L. Hadfield ....................................................................................... 128 Notes on the Netherworld P.G. Hendy ................................................................................. 129 Cave Exploring E.A. Martel ................................................................................................. 133 From the Log .......................................................................................................................... 136 CLUB OFFICERS Chairman / Editor P. G. Hendy, 10 Silver Street, Wells, Somerset Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Bristol City Council electoral review This PDF document contains local resident submissions with surnames B. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. 13 February 2015 I have lived in Westbury on Trym village since 1991 first with my parents and then more recently with my own family. I have always valued the community which flows out from the historical village centre, under the new boundaries my home would no longer be part of this community and I would consider this a great personal loss. Surely the history and heritage of Westbury Village should carry some weight and significance when considering new ward boundaries. I fail to understand how it can be seen as acceptable to have the heart of Westbury on Trym Village boundaries moved to fall under the ward of Henleaze, which does not have the historic significance and village community. Also why it is acceptable for the downsized remaning part of Westbury Village to have only one councillor but this is not ok for any other ward. I therefore support the proposal to have a partnership ward with Henleaze and to share 3 councillors between us. I understand this is the only way to maintain the historical identity and preserve the integrity of the whole village. If other proposed changes were to go ahead I have concern for the value of my property as it would be separated from the historic village centre and fear that at some future date could be absorbed onto other wards. I would also like to include the following good reasons
    [Show full text]
  • Avon Bird Report 2008
    AVON BIRD REPORT 2008 AVON ORNITHOLOGICAL GROUP Front cover: Great Crested Grebe. Photograph by Richard Andrews. Rear cover: Map of the Avon area computer generated by S. Godden, Dept. of Geography, University of Bristol. Text drawings by R.M. Andrews, J.P. Martin, R.J. Prytherch, B.E. Slade, the late L.A. Tucker and Anon. Typeset in WORD 2007 and printed by Healeys, Ipswich ISSN Number – 0956-5744 2 Avon Bird Report 2008 CONTENTS BTO advert Front cover Avon Ornithological Group (AOG) Front cover Editorial H.E. Rose 3 A guide to the records required by the Avon Bird Report 4 Species and subspecies for which descriptions are required 5 A review of 2008 R.J. Higgins 7 Weather in 2008 R.L. Bland 11 Migrant date summary 14 Introduction to systematic list 15 Contributors of records 18 Systematic list Swans and geese R. Mielcarek 19 Ducks M.S. Ponsford 23 Game birds R. Mielcarek 36 Divers to Spoonbill R.J. Higgins 38 Raptors B. Lancastle 45 Water Rail to Crane R. Mielcarek 53 Waders H.E. Rose 56 Skuas to Auks R.M. Andrews 71 Doves to Woodpeckers R. Mielcarek 83 Passerines, Larks to Dipper J. P. Martin 91 Passerines, Wren to Buntings R.L. Bland 97 Escaped, released and hybrid birds R Mielcarek 126 Birds of the Downs, 1994 - 2008 R.L. Bland 127 Metal pollution in Bristol: An assessment using bird of prey S. M. Murgatroyd 137 feathers Bitterns breeding at Chew Valley Lake 1997 - 2001 K. E. Vinicombe 143 Black-necked Grebes breeding at Chew Valley Lake in 1998 K.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Unique Connected
    PRIME UNIQUE CONNECTED DESIGN AND BUILD OPPORTUNITIES UP TO 1,300,000 SQ FT MOUNTPARK BRISTOL XL SEVERN ROAD / CENTRAL AVENUE, BRISTOL, BS10 7ZE MOUNTPARK.COM/BRISTOLXL CHEPSTOW M48 SEVERN BRIDGE THORNBURY Mountpark BristolXL is a new industrial / logistics development situated at the gateway to the south J1 west, Avonmouth in Bristol. M48 A4O3 J23 The scheme has three fundamental benefits: M4 SEC OND SEV ERN A38 CRO M4 J21 SSING J22 M5 NEW J15 / J2O JUNCTION PRIME SEVERN ESTUARY JO1 The site is situated in a prime distribution M4 location, adjacent to the established Central A4O3 M5 A38 Park area of Avonmouth, 10 miles to the M49 A432 north west of Bristol City Centre. A4O3 AVONMOUTH DOCKS FILTON J19 RIVER AVON J18 A4O18 M4 UNIQUE ROYAL A41744 HRS SHEFFIELD PORTBURY J18a DOCKS M32 M1 A38 M6 The proposed scheme can accommodate A4162 NOTTINGHAM a single unit of over 1,000,000 sq ft, which A4 is unique for the area. 3 HRS M42 A4176 A432 A4174 BIRMINGHAM M5 2 HRS M5 M1 A369 M4O CONNECTED A42O A42O BRISTOL 1 HR OXFORD The scheme is strategically located for local and O.5 HRS national distribution via the M49, M4 and M5 A37O M4 M4 LONDON motorways. Accessibility will be further improved in CARDIFF BRISTOL SWINDON 2019 with the opening of a new junction on the M49 A38 A4174 A431 A4174 M3 motorway which is within 1 mile of the site. M4 A37 SOUTHAMPTON PORTSMOUTH A37O BRISTOL AIRPORT CONNECTED ABUNDANT Strategically located, offering Bristol is the economic hub of the south west both connectivity and accessibility, region with excellent labour availability, education resources, and connectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Notfoprint21.Pdf
    2011 Lake Odyssey was a Heritage Lottery Funded project exploring local history through the arts with a particular focus on the 1950’s, when Chew Valley Lake was made. This was a major local event. The town of Moreton was fl ooded to make way for a reservoir supplying water to South Bristol and the Queen visited the area to offi cially open and inaugurate the lake in 1956. The Lake Odyssey 2011 project gave pupils at Chew Valley School and their cluster of primary schools a chance to explore the history of their community in a fun and creative way. Pupils took part in various workshops throughout the spring and summer of 2011 to produce the content for the fi nal Lake Odyssey event day on Saturday 16th July 2011, which saw the local community come together for a day of celebration and performance at Chew Valley Lake. Balloon Launch The Lake Odyssey 2011 project offi cially launched on Friday 4th March with a balloon re- lease. Year seven and eight pupils released the balloons to mark and celebrate the occasion. A logo competition had been running within the primary cluster and Chew Valley School to fi nd a design for the Lake Odyssey logo. The winners were announced by Heritage Lottery representative Cherry Ann Knott. The lucky winners were Bea Tucker from East Harptree Pri- mary School and Hazel Stockwell-Cooke from Chew Valley School, whose designs featured in all publicity for the Lake Odyssey 2011 project. Bishop Sutton Songwriting Swallow class from Bishop Sutton Primary School took part in a song writing workshop, com- posing their own song from scratch with Leo Holloway.
    [Show full text]
  • Stowey Sutton Parish Character Assessment
    Stowey Sutton Parish Council Placemaking Plan Parish Character Assessment November 2013 Stowey Sutton Parish Council i Stowey Sutton Parish Council Contents Table of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Maps........................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Community volunteers .............................................................................................................. 1 Summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 Woodcroft Estate ....................................................................................................................... 5 Church Lane ............................................................................................................................. 13 Sutton Hill Rd & Top Sutton ..................................................................................................... 19 Bonhill Lane & Bonhill Road ..................................................................................................... 27 Cappards Estate ....................................................................................................................... 33 Ham Lane & Stitchings
    [Show full text]
  • The Sandford Gulf and Other Lost Caves of Sandford Hill
    THE SANDFORD GULF AND OTHER LOST CAVES OF SANDFORD HILL By R. M. Taviner During the 18 th century, miners’ working on the western outliers of the Mendip Hills intercepted several small but notable cave systems, including the Banwell caves, Loxton Cavern and Hutton Cavern. Most were subsequently lost, although several have recently been rediscovered by cave explorers, often by following clues provided by the antiquarians who dutifully recorded them. Not all of these caverns have been rediscovered however, including three well documented sites on Sandford Hill. The first, Elephant Cave - which contained the skeleton of a full sized elephant - was recorded in 1770, while the better documented Sandford Bone Fissure was excavated by William Beard, beginning in 1837. Both of these sites are important, but it is the third lost cave, the legendary Sandford Gulf, that most exercises the minds of cavers. It is hoped that this article will help to bring some clarity to proceedings, and through a process of elimination, propose a precise location for the missing Gulf - a very good place to start digging! Sandford Hill from the North-West Map data ©2016 Google ELEPHANT CAVE The full details of this mysterious cave were included in a letter dated 30 th January 1770, sent by William Jeffries of Wrington to The Rev. Alexander Catcott, clergyman, geologist and author of A Treatise on the Deluge. ‘Where these Bones were found in almost the highest part of the Hill on the north Side: they lay in an East and West Direction four fathom deep in a loose Strata composed mostly of small Fragments of limestone, Sand etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1: Citywide Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Level 1 – Citywide Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Contents Purpose of the document .................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Background and strategic planning ........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Context .................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Planning Policy ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Applying the Sequential Test ............................................................................................... 8 1.5 Flood Risk Management Plan .............................................................................................. 8 1.6 Flood risk and water management policy and guidance ................................................. 9 2.0 Flood risk in Bristol .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Sources of flooding ................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 River systems and watercourses in Bristol ...................................................................... 10 2.3 Geology ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy March 2010 Foreword
    Great Western Route Utilisation Strategy March 2010 Foreword I am delighted to present the Great Western Development of this strategy has followed Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS), which sets a now well-established process. Initially, an out the strategic vision for the future of this analysis was carried out into the capacity and vital part of the rail network. As well as the capability of the existing network and train Great Western Main Line itself, the strategy services taking into account major changes covers the network north to Ashchurch and planned over the next 10 years. Future Bicester Town and south to Basingstoke, demand was then analysed with a number of Salisbury and Dorchester. “Gaps” identified and options to resolve these gaps appraised. Those which demonstrated This August will see the 175th anniversary the best value for money are included in of the Great Western Railway. Today, that the strategy. railway carries tens of millions of passengers a year through the Thames Valley, the West The dominant issue is the need to provide Country and Wales. Working closely with our sufficient capacity on peak services, train operating customers, Network Rail is specifically to and from London but also for delivering an ever improving service for those Bristol and Exeter. In the short to medium term passengers, and for freight users. the approach focuses on enabling longer trains to serve these routes, particularly through the More people are choosing to travel by train, introduction of IEP, which will increase capacity and high levels of growth are predicted through new rolling stock and an enhanced to continue, particularly around London timetable, but also through train lengthening Paddington and Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • North Somerset & Mendip Bats SAC Citation
    EC Directive 92/43 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora Citation for Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Name: North Somerset and Mendip Bats Unitary Authority/County: Bath and North East Somerset, North Somerset, Somerset SAC status: Designated on 1 April 2005 Grid reference: ST480544 SAC EU code: UK0030052 Area (ha): 561.19 Component SSSI: Banwell Caves SSSI, Banwell Ochre Caves SSSI, Brockley Hall Stables SSSI, Compton Martin Ochre Mine SSSI, King’s Wood and Urchin Wood SSSI, The Cheddar Complex SSSI, Wookey Hole SSSI Site description: The Cheddar complex and Wookey Hole areas support a wide range of habitats which provide feeding grounds for bats. These include semi-natural dry grasslands of which the principal community present is sheep’s-fescue – meadow oat-grass (Festuca ovina – Helictotrichon pratense) grassland which occurs on rock ledges and on steep slopes with shallow limestone soil, especially in the dry valleys and gorges and on the south-facing scarp of the Mendips. King’s Wood and Urchin Wood have developed over limestone which outcrops in parts of the site and forms a steep scarp to the south-east. There is mostly oak Quercus robur and ash Fraxinus excelsior woodland, though some areas are dominated by small-leaved lime Tilia cordata with both maiden and coppice trees. Other canopy trees include yew Taxus baccata, cherry Prunus avium and wild service tree Sorbus torminalis. There is a rich ground flora including many ferns and mosses. The limestone caves and mines of the Mendips and the north Somerset hills provide a range of important breeding and hibernation sites for lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros and greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum.
    [Show full text]
  • TO LET Offices—1,860 Sq Ft (172.86 Sq M)
    TO LET Offices—1,860 sq ft (172.86 sq m) Self-contained Detached Building Parking New Lease available Former Custom House, Sharpness Docks, Sharpness, Gloucestershire 01452 380064 LOCATION Sharpness Docks are situated adjacent to the river Severn in Gloucestershire and at the end of the Gloucester to Sharpness Ship Canal. The Docks remain very much a working port and receive ships from around the world. Accordingly the area remains popular with commercial property occupiers. The Docks are situated at the far end of the B4066 linking directly to the A38 Bristol Road. Junction 13 and 14 of the M5 Motorway are approximately a 10 minute drive time. DESCRIPTION A detached single storey building of facing brickwork to the elevations under a flat roof. Internally the main office area has been subdivided to form 3 separate working/office areas, however this could be opened out to a more open plan format. Ladies & Gents W.C.’S, a kitchen and shower room are installed. The building benefits from a Quayside location and externally there are lawned areas and demised car parking. The property has a floor area of approximately 1,860 sq ft (172.86 sq m) measured on a gross internal floor area basis. 01452 380064 KEY INFORMATION Services Service Charge Mains water, drainage, gas and electricity are connected to A charge is made to cover the upkeep and maintenance of the property. the common parts of the estate. Heating is via a gas fired boiler and traditional ‘wet’ Quoting Terms radiator system. The property is available by way of a new full repairing and insuring lease for a negotiable term of years.
    [Show full text]