DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1904.06560V5 [Quant-Ph] 7 Jul 2021 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1904.06560V5 [Quant-Ph] 7 Jul 2021 2 ∗ A Quantum Engineer’s Guide to Superconducting Qubits P. Krantz1,2,†, M. Kjaergaard1, F. Yan1, T.P. Orlando1, S. Gustavsson1, and W. D. Oliver1,3,‡ 1Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2Wallenberg Centre for Quantum Technology (WACQT), Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SE-41296, Sweden and 3MIT Lincoln Laboratory, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, MA 02420, USA (Dated: 9 July 2021) The aim of this review is to provide quantum engineers with an introductory guide to the central concepts and challenges in the rapidly accelerating field of superconducting quantum circuits. Over the past twenty years, the field has matured from a predominantly basic research endeavor to one that increasingly explores the engineering of larger-scale superconducting quantum systems. Here, we review several foundational elements – qubit design, noise properties, qubit control, and readout techniques – developed during this period, bridging fundamental concepts in circuit quantum electrodynamics (cQED) and contemporary, state- of-the-art applications in gate-model quantum computation. CONTENTS 1. Connecting T1 to S(ω) 19 2. Connecting Tϕ to S(ω) 20 I. Introduction 2 3. Noise spectroscopy 21 A. Organization of this article 2 E. Engineering noise mitigation 21 1. Materials and fabrication improvements 22 II. Engineering quantum circuits 3 2. Design improvements 22 A. From quantum harmonic oscillator to the 3. Dynamical error suppression 22 transmon qubit 3 4. Cryogenic engineering 22 B. Qubit Hamiltonian engineering 6 1. Tunable qubit: split transmon 6 IV. Qubit control 22 2. Towards larger anharmonicity: flux qubit A. Boolean logic gates used in classical and fluxonium 7 computers 23 C. Interaction Hamiltonian engineering 9 B. Quantum logic gates used in quantum 1. Physical coupling: capacitive and computers 24 inductive 9 C. Comparing classical and quantum gates 26 2. Coupling axis: transverse and 1. Gate sets and gate synthesis 27 longitudinal 10 2. Addressing superconducting qubits 27 D. Single-qubit gates 27 III. Noise, decoherence, and error mitigation 12 1. Capacitive coupling for X,Y control 28 A. Types of noise 12 2. Virtual Z gate 30 1. Systematic noise 12 3. The DRAG scheme 30 2. Stochastic noise 12 E. The iSWAP two-qubit gate in tunable 3. Noise strength and qubit susceptibility 12 qubits 31 B. Modeling noise and decoherence 12 1. Deriving the iSWAP unitary 31 1. Bloch sphere representation 12 2. Applications of the iSWAP gate 33 arXiv:1904.06560v5 [quant-ph] 7 Jul 2021 2. Bloch-Redfield model of decoherence 13 F. The CPHASE two-qubit gate in tunable 3. Modification due to 1/f-type noise 16 qubits 33 4. Noise power spectral density (PSD) 17 1. Trajectory design for the CPHASE gate 35 C. Common examples of noise 18 2. The CPHASE gate for quantum error 1. Charge noise 18 correction 35 2. Magnetic flux noise 18 3. Quantum simulation and algorithm 3. Photon number fluctuations 19 demonstrations using CPHASE 36 4. Quasiparticles 19 G. Two-qubit gates using only microwaves 37 D. Operator form of qubit-environment 1. The operational principle of the CR gate 37 interaction 19 2. Improvements to the CR gate and quantum error correction experiments using CR 38 3. Quantum simulation and algorithm † ‡ ∗ [email protected], [email protected] demonstrations with the CR gate 38 2 4. Other microwave-only gates: bSWAP, and polarized photons30–33, where the quantum informa- MAP, and RIP 39 tion is encoded in natural microscopic quantum systems, H. Gate implementations with tunable superconducting qubits are macroscopic in size and litho- coupling 40 graphically defined. One remarkable feature of superconducting qubits is V. Qubit readout 41 that their energy-level spectra are governed by circuit el- A. Dispersive readout 41 ement parameters and thus are configurable; they can be B. Measuring the resonator amplitude and designed to exhibit “atom-like” energy spectra with de- phase 43 sired properties. Therefore, superconducting qubits are 1. Representation of the readout signal 43 also often referred to as artificial atoms, offering a rich 2. I-Q mixing 44 parameter space of possible qubit properties and opera- 3. Homodyne demodulation 44 tion regimes, with predictable performance in terms of transition frequencies, anharmonicity, and complexity. 4. Heterodyne demodulation 45 While there are many other excellent reviews on su- C. Weak and strong qubit measurements: perconducting qubits, see e.g. Refs. 34–43, this work Impact of noise 46 specifically aims to introduce new quantum engineers D. “Purcell filters” for faster readout 48 (academic and industrial alike) to the terminology and E. Improve signal-to-noise ratio: Parametric state-of-the-art practices used in the rapidly accelerat- amplification 50 ing field of superconducting quantum computing. The 1. Quantum-limited amplification processes 50 reader is assumed to be familiar with basic concepts that 2. Operation of Josephson parametric span classical physics, quantum mechanics, and electrical amplifiers 51 engineering. In particular, readers will find it useful to 3. The traveling wave parametric amplifier 53 have had previous exposure to classical mechanics, the Schr¨odingerequation, the Bloch sphere representation of VI. Summary and outlook 54 qubit states, second quantization, basic concepts of su- perconductivity, electromagnetism, introductory circuit Acknowledgments 55 analysis, classical boolean logic, linear dynamical sys- tems, analog and digital signal processing, and famil- iarity with microwave components such as transmission I. INTRODUCTION lines and mixers. These topics will be introduced as they arise, but having basic prior knowledge will be helpful. Quantum processors harness the intrinsic properties of quantum mechanical systems – such as quantum paral- lelism and quantum interference – to solve certain prob- A. Organization of this article lems where classical computers fall short1–6. Over the past two decades, rapid developments in the science and This review is organized in the following four sections; engineering of quantum systems have advanced the fron- first, in Sec. II, we explore the parameter space avail- tier in quantum computation, from the realm of scien- able when designing superconducting circuits. In particu- tific explorations on single isolated quantum systems to- lar, we look at the promising capacitively-shunted planar ward the creation and manipulation of multi-qubit pro- qubit modalities and how these can be engineered with cessors7,8. In particular, the requirements imposed by desired properties, such as transition frequency, anhar- larger quantum processors have shifted of mindset within monicity, and reduced susceptibility to various sources the community, from solely scientific discovery to the de- of noise. In this section, we also introduce several ways velopment of new, foundational engineering abstractions in which interactions between qubits can be engineered, associated with the design, control, and readout of multi- in order to implement two-qubit entangling operations, qubit quantum systems. The result is the emergence of a needed for a universal gate set. new discipline termed quantum engineering, which serves In Sec. III, we discuss systematic and stochastic noise, to bridge the basic sciences, mathematics, and computer the concepts of noise strength and qubit noise suscepti- science with fields generally associated with traditional bility, and the common sources of noise which lead to engineering. decoherence in superconducting circuits. We introduce One prominent platform for constructing a multi-qubit the Bloch-Redfield model of decoherence, characterized quantum processor involves superconducting qubits, in by longitudinal and transverse relaxation times T1 and which information is stored in the quantum degrees of T2, and discuss the implications of 1/f noise. We then freedom of nanofabricated, anharmonic oscillators con- define the noise power spectral density, which is com- structed from superconducting circuit elements. In con- monly used to characterize noise processes, and describe trast to other platforms, e.g. electron spins in sili- how it drives decoherence. Finally, we close the section con9–14 and quantum dots15–18, trapped ions19–23, ul- with a review of coherent control methods used to miti- tracold atoms24–27, nitrogen-vacancies in diamonds28,29, gate certain types of coherence, reversible noise. 3 In Sec. IV, we provide a review of how single- and The time-independent Hamiltonian Hˆ governs the time ˆ two-qubit operations are typically implemented in super- evolution of the system through the operator e−iHt/~. conducing circuits, by using a combination of local mag- Thus, just as with classical systems, determining the netic flux control and microwave drives. In particular, we Hamiltonian of a system – whether the classical Hamil- discuss the family of two-qubit gates arising from a ca- tonian H or its quantum counterpart Hˆ – is the first step pacitive coupling between qubits, and introduce several to deriving its dynamical behavior. In Sec. IV, we con- recent advances that have been demonstrated to achieve sider the case when the Hamiltonian is time-dependent high-fidelity gates, as well as applications in quantum in the context of qubit control. information processing that use these gates. The contin- To understand the dynamics of a superconducting ued development of high-fidelity two-qubit gates in super- qubit circuit, it is natural to start with the classical de- conducting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Lattice Structure of Quantum Logic
    BULL. AUSTRAL. MATH. SOC. MOS 8106, *8IOI, 0242 VOL. I (1969), 333-340 On the lattice structure of quantum logic P. D. Finch A weak logical structure is defined as a set of boolean propositional logics in which one can define common operations of negation and implication. The set union of the boolean components of a weak logical structure is a logic of propositions which is an orthocomplemented poset, where orthocomplementation is interpreted as negation and the partial order as implication. It is shown that if one can define on this logic an operation of logical conjunction which has certain plausible properties, then the logic has the structure of an orthomodular lattice. Conversely, if the logic is an orthomodular lattice then the conjunction operation may be defined on it. 1. Introduction The axiomatic development of non-relativistic quantum mechanics leads to a quantum logic which has the structure of an orthomodular poset. Such a structure can be derived from physical considerations in a number of ways, for example, as in Gunson [7], Mackey [77], Piron [72], Varadarajan [73] and Zierler [74]. Mackey [77] has given heuristic arguments indicating that this quantum logic is, in fact, not just a poset but a lattice and that, in particular, it is isomorphic to the lattice of closed subspaces of a separable infinite dimensional Hilbert space. If one assumes that the quantum logic does have the structure of a lattice, and not just that of a poset, it is not difficult to ascertain what sort of further assumptions lead to a "coordinatisation" of the logic as the lattice of closed subspaces of Hilbert space, details will be found in Jauch [8], Piron [72], Varadarajan [73] and Zierler [74], Received 13 May 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Quantum Mechanics
    Relational Quantum Mechanics Matteo Smerlak† September 17, 2006 †Ecole normale sup´erieure de Lyon, F-69364 Lyon, EU E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this internship report, we present Carlo Rovelli’s relational interpretation of quantum mechanics, focusing on its historical and conceptual roots. A critical analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument is then put forward, which suggests that the phenomenon of ‘quantum non-locality’ is an artifact of the orthodox interpretation, and not a physical effect. A speculative discussion of the potential import of the relational view for quantum-logic is finally proposed. Figure 0.1: Composition X, W. Kandinski (1939) 1 Acknowledgements Beyond its strictly scientific value, this Master 1 internship has been rich of encounters. Let me express hereupon my gratitude to the great people I have met. First, and foremost, I want to thank Carlo Rovelli1 for his warm welcome in Marseille, and for the unexpected trust he showed me during these six months. Thanks to his rare openness, I have had the opportunity to humbly but truly take part in active research and, what is more, to glimpse the vivid landscape of scientific creativity. One more thing: I have an immense respect for Carlo’s plainness, unaltered in spite of his renown achievements in physics. I am very grateful to Antony Valentini2, who invited me, together with Frank Hellmann, to the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, in Canada. We spent there an incredible week, meeting world-class physicists such as Lee Smolin, Jeffrey Bub or John Baez, and enthusiastic postdocs such as Etera Livine or Simone Speziale.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering the Coupling of Superconducting Qubits
    Engineering the coupling of superconducting qubits Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von M. Sc. Alessandro Ciani aus Penne, Italien Berichter: Prof. Dr. David DiVincenzo Prof. Dr. Fabian Hassler Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12 April 2019 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek verfügbar. ii «Considerate la vostra semenza: fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e conoscenza.» Dante Alighieri, "La Divina Commedia", Inferno, Canto XXVI, vv. 118-120. iii Abstract The way to build a scalable and reliable quantum computer that truly exploits the quantum power faces several challenges. Among the various proposals for building a quantum computer, superconducting qubits have rapidly progressed and hold good promises in the near-term future. In particular, the possibility to design the required interactions is one of the most appealing features of this kind of architecture. This thesis deals with some detailed aspects of this problem focusing on architectures based on superconducting transmon-like qubits. After reviewing the basic tools needed for the study of superconducting circuits and the main kinds of superconducting qubits, we move to the analyisis of a possible scheme for realizing direct parity measurement. Parity measurements, or in general stabilizer measurements, are fundamental tools for realizing quantum error correct- ing codes, that are believed to be fundamental for dealing with the problem of de- coherence that affects any physical implementation of a quantum computer. While these measurements are usually done indirectly with the help of ancilla qubits, the scheme that we analyze performs the measurement directly, and requires the engi- neering of a precise matching condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Phonon Anharmonicity of Ionic Compounds and Metals
    Phonon Anharmonicity of Ionic Compounds and Metals Thesis by Chen W. Li In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2012 (Defended May 4th, 2012) ii © 2012 Chen W. Li All Rights Reserved iii To my lovely wife, Jun, whose support is indispensable through the years, and my son, Derek iv Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Brent Fultz, for his guidance and support throughout my graduate student years at Caltech, and especially for his efforts to offer me a second chance at admission after the visa difficulty. I am very fortunate to have had him as a mentor and collaborator during these years. Without his insightful advice, this work would not have been possible. I owe many thanks to all current and former members of the Fultz group, who have been a constant source of thoughts and support. In particular, I would like to thank Mike McKerns for his guidance on the Raman and computational work. Special thanks to my officemates, Olivier Delaire (now at Oak Ridge National Lab), Max Kresch (now at IDA), Mike Winterrose (now at MIT Lincoln Lab), and Jorge Muñoz, who made the work much more enjoyable. Thanks to the former DANSE postdocs: Nikolay Markovskiy, Xiaoli Tang, Alexander Dementsov, and J. Brandon Keith. You helped me a lot on programming and calculations. Also thanks to other former group members: Matthew Lucas (now at Air Force Research Laboratory), Rebecca Stevens, Hongjin Tan (now at Contour Energy Systems), and Justin Purewal (now at Ford Motor/University of Michigan); as well as other current group members: Hillary Smith, Tian Lan, Lisa Mauger, Sally Tracy, Nick Stadie, and David Abrecht.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Grover's Algorithm on the IBM Quantum Computers
    Implementing Grover’s Algorithm on the IBM Quantum Computers Aamir Mandviwalla*, Keita Ohshiro* and Bo Ji Abstract—This paper focuses on testing the current viability of Our goal in this paper is to study how close we are using quantum computers for the processing of data-driven tasks hardware-wise to realistically being able to exploit the poten- fueled by emerging data science applications. We test the publicly tial benefits of quantum algorithms. Prior work is rather limited available IBM quantum computers using Grover’s algorithm, a well-known quantum search algorithm, to obtain a baseline for this subject. There exist articles proclaiming that the age for the general evaluations of these quantum devices and to of quantum computing is only a year or two away along with investigate the impacts of various factors such as number of less positive articles that do not expect major advancements quantum bits (or qubits), qubit choice, and device choice. The for at least ten years [7], [8]. Instead of providing a prediction main contributions of this paper include a new 4-qubit imple- for the future, in this paper we aim to evaluate the accuracy mentation of Grover’s algorithm and test results showing the current capabilities of quantum computers. Our study indicates of quantum computers that are publicly available now. that quantum computers can currently only be used accurately To accomplish this goal, we run tests using Grover’s al- for solving simple problems with very small amounts of data. gorithm implemented in a variety of different ways on the There are also notable differences between different selections of publicly available IBM computers: IBM Q 5 Tenerife (5-qubit the qubits in the implementation design and between different chip) and IBM Q 16 Ruschlikon¨ (16-qubit chip) [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Motion of the Reduced Density Operator
    Motion of the Reduced Density Operator Nicholas Wheeler, Reed College Physics Department Spring 2009 Introduction. Quantum mechanical decoherence, dissipation and measurements all involve the interaction of the system of interest with an environmental system (reservoir, measurement device) that is typically assumed to possess a great many degrees of freedom (while the system of interest is typically assumed to possess relatively few degrees of freedom). The state of the composite system is described by a density operator ρ which in the absence of system-bath interaction we would denote ρs ρe, though in the cases of primary interest that notation becomes unavailable,⊗ since in those cases the states of the system and its environment are entangled. The observable properties of the system are latent then in the reduced density operator ρs = tre ρ (1) which is produced by “tracing out” the environmental component of ρ. Concerning the specific meaning of (1). Let n) be an orthonormal basis | in the state space H of the (open) system, and N) be an orthonormal basis s !| " in the state space H of the (also open) environment. Then n) N) comprise e ! " an orthonormal basis in the state space H = H H of the |(closed)⊗| composite s e ! " system. We are in position now to write ⊗ tr ρ I (N ρ I N) e ≡ s ⊗ | s ⊗ | # ! " ! " ↓ = ρ tr ρ in separable cases s · e The dynamics of the composite system is generated by Hamiltonian of the form H = H s + H e + H i 2 Motion of the reduced density operator where H = h I s s ⊗ e = m h n m N n N $ | s| % | % ⊗ | % · $ | ⊗ $ | m,n N # # $% & % &' H = I h e s ⊗ e = n M n N M h N | % ⊗ | % · $ | ⊗ $ | $ | e| % n M,N # # $% & % &' H = m M m M H n N n N i | % ⊗ | % $ | ⊗ $ | i | % ⊗ | % $ | ⊗ $ | m,n M,N # # % &$% & % &'% & —all components of which we will assume to be time-independent.
    [Show full text]
  • Qiskit Backend Specifications for Openqasm and Openpulse
    Qiskit Backend Specifications for OpenQASM and OpenPulse Experiments David C. McKay1,∗ Thomas Alexander1, Luciano Bello1, Michael J. Biercuk2, Lev Bishop1, Jiayin Chen2, Jerry M. Chow1, Antonio D. C´orcoles1, Daniel Egger1, Stefan Filipp1, Juan Gomez1, Michael Hush2, Ali Javadi-Abhari1, Diego Moreda1, Paul Nation1, Brent Paulovicks1, Erick Winston1, Christopher J. Wood1, James Wootton1 and Jay M. Gambetta1 1IBM Research 2Q-CTRL Pty Ltd, Sydney NSW Australia September 11, 2018 Abstract As interest in quantum computing grows, there is a pressing need for standardized API's so that algorithm designers, circuit designers, and physicists can be provided a common reference frame for designing, executing, and optimizing experiments. There is also a need for a language specification that goes beyond gates and allows users to specify the time dynamics of a quantum experiment and recover the time dynamics of the output. In this document we provide a specification for a common interface to backends (simulators and experiments) and a standarized data structure (Qobj | quantum object) for sending experiments to those backends via Qiskit. We also introduce OpenPulse, a language for specifying pulse level control (i.e. control of the continuous time dynamics) of a general quantum device independent of the specific arXiv:1809.03452v1 [quant-ph] 10 Sep 2018 hardware implementation. ∗[email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction3 1.1 Intended Audience . .4 1.2 Outline of Document . .4 1.3 Outside of the Scope . .5 1.4 Interface Language and Schemas . .5 2 Qiskit API5 2.1 General Overview of a Qiskit Experiment . .7 2.2 Provider . .8 2.3 Backend .
    [Show full text]
  • Lattice Surgery with a Twist: Simplifying Clifford Gates of Surface Codes
    Lattice Surgery with a Twist: Simplifying Clifford Gates of Surface Codes Daniel Litinski and Felix von Oppen Dahlem Center for Complex Quantum Systems and Fachbereich Physik, Freie Universit¨at Berlin, Arnimallee 14, 14195 Berlin, Germany We present a planar surface-code-based bilizers requires more potentially faulty controlled-not scheme for fault-tolerant quantum computation (CNOT) gates. which eliminates the time overhead of single- The main drawback of surface codes in comparison qubit Clifford gates, and implements long-range to color codes is the absence of transversal single-qubit multi-target CNOT gates with a time overhead Clifford gates, i.e., the gates that are products of the that scales only logarithmically with the control- Hadamard gate H and the phase gate S. While the target separation. This is done by replacing transversal Clifford gates of color codes provide them hardware operations for single-qubit Clifford with fast logical H and S gates, defect-based propos- gates with a classical tracking protocol. Inter- als for surface codes [14] implement the H gate via a qubit communication is added via a modified multi-step measurement protocol, and the S gate via a lattice surgery protocol that employs twist de- distilled ancilla qubit. In order to lower the overhead fects of the surface code. The long-range multi- of single-qubit Clifford gates, surface code qubits can target CNOT gates facilitate magic state distil- be encoded using twist defects [15], which are essen- lation, which renders our scheme fault-tolerant tially Majoranas that can be braided via code defor- and universal. mation [16].
    [Show full text]
  • The Union of Quantum Field Theory and Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics
    The Union of Quantum Field Theory and Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics Thesis by Anthony Bartolotta In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 24, 2018 ii c 2018 Anthony Bartolotta ORCID: 0000-0003-4971-9545 All rights reserved iii Acknowledgments My time as a graduate student at Caltech has been a journey for me, both professionally and personally. This journey would not have been possible without the support of many individuals. First, I would like to thank my advisors, Sean Carroll and Mark Wise. Without their support, this thesis would not have been written. Despite entering Caltech with weaker technical skills than many of my fellow graduate students, Mark took me on as a student and gave me my first project. Mark also granted me the freedom to pursue my own interests, which proved instrumental in my decision to work on non-equilibrium thermodynamics. I am deeply grateful for being provided this priviledge and for his con- tinued input on my research direction. Sean has been an incredibly effective research advisor, despite being a newcomer to the field of non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Sean was the organizing force behind our first paper on this topic and connected me with other scientists in the broader community; at every step Sean has tried to smoothly transition me from the world of particle physics to that of non-equilibrium thermody- namics. My research would not have been nearly as fruitful without his support. I would also like to thank the other two members of my thesis and candidacy com- mittees, John Preskill and Keith Schwab.
    [Show full text]
  • Density Matrix Description of NMR
    Density Matrix Description of NMR BCMB/CHEM 8190 Operators in Matrix Notation • It will be important, and convenient, to express the commonly used operators in matrix form • Consider the operator Iz and the single spin functions α and β - recall ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ Ix α = 1 2 β Ix β = 1 2α Iy α = 1 2 iβ Iy β = −1 2 iα Iz α = +1 2α Iz β = −1 2 β α α = β β =1 α β = β α = 0 - recall the expectation value for an observable Q = ψ Qˆ ψ = ∫ ψ∗Qˆψ dτ Qˆ - some operator ψ - some wavefunction - the matrix representation is the possible expectation values for the basis functions α β α ⎡ α Iˆ α α Iˆ β ⎤ ⎢ z z ⎥ ⎢ ˆ ˆ ⎥ β ⎣ β Iz α β Iz β ⎦ ⎡ α Iˆ α α Iˆ β ⎤ ⎡1 2 α α −1 2 α β ⎤ ⎡1 2 0 ⎤ ⎡1 0 ⎤ ˆ ⎢ z z ⎥ 1 Iz = = ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ˆ ˆ ⎥ 1 2 β α −1 2 β β 0 −1 2 2 0 −1 ⎣ β Iz α β Iz β ⎦ ⎣⎢ ⎦⎥ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ • This is convenient, as the operator is just expressed as a matrix of numbers – no need to derive it again, just store it in computer Operators in Matrix Notation • The matrices for Ix, Iy,and Iz are called the Pauli spin matrices ˆ ⎡ 0 1 2⎤ 1 ⎡0 1 ⎤ ˆ ⎡0 −1 2 i⎤ 1 ⎡0 −i ⎤ ˆ ⎡1 2 0 ⎤ 1 ⎡1 0 ⎤ Ix = ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ Iy = ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ Iz = ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ ⎣1 2 0 ⎦ 2 ⎣1 0⎦ ⎣1 2 i 0 ⎦ 2 ⎣i 0 ⎦ ⎣ 0 −1 2⎦ 2 ⎣0 −1 ⎦ • Express α , β , α and β as 1×2 column and 2×1 row vectors ⎡1⎤ ⎡0⎤ α = ⎢ ⎥ β = ⎢ ⎥ α = [1 0] β = [0 1] ⎣0⎦ ⎣1⎦ • Using matrices, the operations of Ix, Iy, and Iz on α and β , and the orthonormality relationships, are shown below ˆ 1 ⎡0 1⎤⎡1⎤ 1 ⎡0⎤ 1 ˆ 1 ⎡0 1⎤⎡0⎤ 1 ⎡1⎤ 1 Ix α = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ = β Ix β = ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ = α 2⎣1 0⎦⎣0⎦ 2⎣1⎦ 2 2⎣1 0⎦⎣1⎦ 2⎣0⎦ 2 ⎡1⎤ ⎡0⎤ α α = [1 0]⎢ ⎥
    [Show full text]
  • A Scanning Transmon Qubit for Strong Coupling Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
    ARTICLE Received 8 Mar 2013 | Accepted 10 May 2013 | Published 7 Jun 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2991 A scanning transmon qubit for strong coupling circuit quantum electrodynamics W. E. Shanks1, D. L. Underwood1 & A. A. Houck1 Like a quantum computer designed for a particular class of problems, a quantum simulator enables quantitative modelling of quantum systems that is computationally intractable with a classical computer. Superconducting circuits have recently been investigated as an alternative system in which microwave photons confined to a lattice of coupled resonators act as the particles under study, with qubits coupled to the resonators producing effective photon–photon interactions. Such a system promises insight into the non-equilibrium physics of interacting bosons, but new tools are needed to understand this complex behaviour. Here we demonstrate the operation of a scanning transmon qubit and propose its use as a local probe of photon number within a superconducting resonator lattice. We map the coupling strength of the qubit to a resonator on a separate chip and show that the system reaches the strong coupling regime over a wide scanning area. 1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Olden Street, Princeton 08550, New Jersey, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to W.E.S. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:1991 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2991 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2991 ver the past decade, the study of quantum physics using In this work, we describe a scanning superconducting superconducting circuits has seen rapid advances in qubit and demonstrate its coupling to a superconducting CPWR Osample design and measurement techniques1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • Qubit Coupled Cluster Singles and Doubles Variational Quantum Eigensolver Ansatz for Electronic Structure Calculations
    Quantum Science and Technology PAPER Qubit coupled cluster singles and doubles variational quantum eigensolver ansatz for electronic structure calculations To cite this article: Rongxin Xia and Sabre Kais 2020 Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 015001 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 128.210.107.25 on 20/10/2020 at 12:02 Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (2021) 015001 https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/abbc74 PAPER Qubit coupled cluster singles and doubles variational quantum RECEIVED 27 July 2020 eigensolver ansatz for electronic structure calculations REVISED 14 September 2020 Rongxin Xia and Sabre Kais∗ ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION Department of Chemistry, Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue 29 September 2020 University, West Lafayette, United States of America ∗ PUBLISHED Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed. 20 October 2020 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: variational quantum eigensolver, electronic structure calculations, unitary coupled cluster singles and doubles excitations Abstract Variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) for electronic structure calculations is believed to be one major potential application of near term quantum computing. Among all proposed VQE algorithms, the unitary coupled cluster singles and doubles excitations (UCCSD) VQE ansatz has achieved high accuracy and received a lot of research interest. However, the UCCSD VQE based on fermionic excitations needs extra terms for the parity when using Jordan–Wigner transformation. Here we introduce a new VQE ansatz based on the particle preserving exchange gate to achieve qubit excitations. The proposed VQE ansatz has gate complexity up-bounded to O(n4)for all-to-all connectivity where n is the number of qubits of the Hamiltonian.
    [Show full text]