3/25/2014
Professor Donald McFarlane
Mimicry and Defense
Protective Strategies Camouflage (“Cryptic coloration”)
Diverse Coloration
Diversion Structures
Startle Structures
2
1 3/25/2014
Camouflage (“Cryptic coloration”) Minimize 3d shape, e.g. flatfish
Halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) 3
4
2 3/25/2014
Counter‐Shading
5
Disruptive Coloration
6
3 3/25/2014
Polymorphism – Cepeae snails
7
Diversion Structures
8
4 3/25/2014
Startle Structures
9
Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration)
Advertise organism as distasteful, toxic or venomous
Problem: Predators must learn by attacking prey; predator learning is costly to prey.
Therefore strong selective pressure to STANDARDIZE on a few colors/patterns. This is MULLERIAN MIMICRY.
Most common is yellow/black, or red/yellow/black
10
5 3/25/2014
Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration)
Bumblebee (Bombus Black and yellow mangrove snake (Boiga sp.) Sand Wasp (bembix oculata) dendrophila)
Yellow‐banded poison dart frog (Dendrobates leucomelas
Fire salamander ( Salamandra salamandra) 11
Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration)
coral snakes (Micrurus sp.)
~ 50 species in two families, all venomous
12
6 3/25/2014
Batesian Mimicry
1862 –Henry Walter Bates; “A Naturalist on the River Amazons”
13
Batesian Mimicry
Batesian mimics “cheat” –they lack toxins, venom, etc. but imitate toxic/venomous species to gain the advantage of predator deterrence.
14
7 3/25/2014
Batesian mimicry involves an unpalatble/dangerous MODEL and a palatable MIMIC. Disadvantage is that mimics must be rare compared to models, otherwise predator learning will be reversed. How much rarer? How unpalatable/dangerous is the model? What is the shape of the predator learning curve? What proportion of the predator population is experienced versus naïve?
Automimicry Danaus plexippus Monarch butterflies feed on milkweed and accumulate toxic cardenolides.
Cardenolide concentration varies greatly between individuals (only 12 of 50 collected caused vomiting in Blue Jays)
WITHIN the species, palatable individuals mimic high‐cardenolide individuals.
8 3/25/2014
Three examples of female‐limited polymorphism in Batesian mimicry. Hypolimnas misippus: across western India and Africa, males are monomorphic and nonmimetic whereas females are trimorphic, each mimicking a different form of the model, Danaus chrysippus. There are no male‐like nonmimetic females in this species ( Ford, 1975, Smith, 1984 and Wynter‐Blyth, 1957). Papilio polytes: across their distributional range in the Oriental Region and in several subspecific variations, P. polytes males are monomorphic and nonmimetic whereas females may be polymorphic, with one male‐like nonmimetic form and usually one but sometimes two form(s) mimicking locally abundant Pachliopta models. The subspecies Papilio p. romulus in Sri Lanka and peninsular India has trimorphic females, with a male‐like form (cyrus) and two mimetic forms (polytes, also known as stichius, and romulus) ( Ford, 1975, Kunte, 2000 and Wallace, 1865). Papilio dardanus: males of this African species are monomorphic and nonmimetic in several subspecific variations whereas females in most populations are polymorphic, mimicking Danaus, Amauris, Acraea, Bematistes and day‐flying moth models. Only the subspecies in Madagascar (illustrated in the bottom row), Grande Comore Island and Abyssinia have male‐like nonmimetic females
Island of Trinidad
Auto‐ Auto‐ mimicry mimicry
9 3/25/2014
Wassmanian mimicry
Ant‐Mimicing spiders (right: Synemosyna formica)
10 3/25/2014
Rove beetle: Paederus littoralis
(Wassmanian mimic of ants)
Aggressive Mimicry
Photuris sp.
Female Photuris attract male Photinus as prey.
Photinus sp.
11 3/25/2014
12