ISSN 1 Abstract Erika M

Chicago uriel 2472 l’histoire conserver d’autres soutenu ta savoir ainsi de Le . Wolf the emotional as suffered and ’s Freud’s

Schmidt nt

Freud

cas a G

psychoanalytic

Psychoanalytic que

2472

by

ardiner que Man. psychoanalyst,

son de

legacy

case the

from

psychanalyste,

émotivement

qui dans

de

par « MSW angoisse and la

l’homme

Gardiner realities This

a study

version

and

significant lesréalités

, été material

l’établissement which 1

Institute

paper

menacé

the

known

et establishment

of

au

became dans

dépression was freudienne W

ainsi

support

tells

deviendra

the loup olf de anxiety

Psychoanalytic

par as

threatened

le

la

M

Wolf “The Gardiner’s que

contexte l’état »

an intertwined vie

psychanalytique maintien to

and considérable.

:

matériellement. worked de Wolf entrelacée P de him.

Man’s politique reserving

depression.

by l’h

l’homme de

Man” psychoanalytic story omme

Gardin une l’histoire

to post with

de preserve

à version

in

preserved

a Muriel -

celle termination

la er, au

au

legacy

the the ont

Discourse Muriel

psychanalyse

Gardiner, de loup Anna loup.

context de

classi Wolf

la fait Gardiner, Freud’s

politics

l’homme

psychanalyse.

a

après

Gardiner,

Freud

Cet classical un

que

Man’s, life

of

Anna

article

effort son

version

du after

the dont and après

in

au

patrimoine

whose

analyse, version history

which

Freud provided others his

loup, la

afin sa raconte

Volume

of vie

death

mort

life

the

l’a he de en of of

in et à

4,

Issue

1

- 30

May

Psychoanalytic Discourse ,

2019

Man decided 1929 Muriel The significant I reputation Her experience, Muriel theory analytic represented support the two reality, of The environment, community life cured. ended uncover the psychoanalytic “From

tell

Fre

rest steps

for

with story

friendship Beginning . and the

ud’s

his

and

In

recurrence

Gardiner’s the

the Her s of Gardiner from she

community

knew

story in

Ruth the reality, of analysis

as his

friends technique, Wolf theory

History providing the

was the wanted the

analyst,

unconscious Anna therapists

and

life,

that Mack

of

canon. with

making

of Wolf

possibilities a

Man

the

lso

Muriel the

played

of and and in

a relationship he he

Freud

of

to

Beautiful

tried Anna

Wolf 1914, symptoms Brunswick

a Wolf Ruth could Man’s suffered

even friendship, had

patrons. technique an

learn source In and of

Gardiner

an devoted meaning to this

Infantile three

a Man

Freud just Man

though Mack

use

the

neurosis

insure to treatment important of

text,

of

from

Friendship

to

be speak

additional relied analytic

. and additional took

the

and support financial fore Though reinforced the

herself Brunswick,

and they of

Neurosis” Freud

that

for symptoms,

analytic

and pride

symptoms Freud Wolf on Russian.

the

with

how

characterological recognized he community. role

psychotherapeutic

demonstrates for to outbreak

pres income. he

periods support

in

could

Man

Freud

pronounced she preserving

her

achieved

him,

in his process.

ents holds

provided

was

Mack

came that

the

began interest identity

be

documented of functioning and his Gardiner, of his

easily a

the leads Wolf

analysis, As

World

theory Brunswick

to place a

a precarious the her innocuously

The

modicum

living

link

him an Freud’s be difficulties. in as

to

dysregulated

way

Man’s

fath

help

Freud’s maintaining

one

introduction

of

War involved

standard a to of cured

one

cure. as the

documentation

er’s

special the

psychoanalytic infantile for

of

most

I,

somet also

psychological

of revolutionary

briefly life

psychoanalytic the

legacy. Freud

most after most

enough

When stability,

The in

bearers

analyzed famous importance Wolf afte

hing

and left

the sexuality, of termination.

famous when considered with psychoanalytic

r the

-

the

In

wing depended in of Wolf his Man’s

throughout

wi of this

patient,

Wolf Freud

Vienna

rest technique a

the Gardiner potential stability.

thin analytic

holding Freud’s patient. politics

world. Man’s paper,

in traces

of

Wolf most Man

him

and

the the

his

on he In in

31

Psychoanalytic Discourse way way She probable w Clearly, tenor ( What happen In in were regime, learned me this unintelligible. pour me “I Contrast his 1932, art, by things: a every herself, since Gardiner,

conscientious ho

came fact, telling

his

capacity

in

to

and

was could

there. back

committed out

Jewish

her

of

Gardiner Wednesday his shall my acute

Pank Dostoevsky,

she

to

face that there his

Gardiner psychoanalysis”

not this

suicide, a days

usual

Gardiner to

apartment

see me? 1971,

flood

Bringing began

refrain,

I

as e observations the

only

to or his

with jeff

do,

was he at

an

Alarmed face no polite involved

hour

U.S.,

I suicide

Wellesley wife

p

of needed

and

“scarcely

ina

Frau heard always insurance . Russian their afternoon an longer

312). of

“Why

with words

Freud, dvisable where

all to

of upsurge and agreed had this

Doktor?

meeting Russian

her echoes his

when

that

help,

the

in had They ( which have

ce did Gardiner, trauma, lessons recently

which

College,

even

estate dangerous we connections or

salesman remonious Wolf

while

he

to

time but

this in

but he

the

bad

met could

of

see

grammar, was in

grew knew

the

Tell even was

because and

Pank

analysts Man

have with French

to 1938, he he

several luck. him committed

had

making 1971, number

study

talk so

fortune out sobbed, patiently

19 me political

the

dangerous, e Serge on

manner

to

a first jeff’s and

he , a

of vague

I’m in happen

of one Impressionists…I we of Nazis what

were few

more Russian, p could

a

. resources

privacy” in i us

his of his

in

would 311). history Pank really “Why

always of

,

months

suicide

Paris work. trie

conspicuous suicides the

plan fleeing but to

we times father’s excitement the

renew

to

I d e

do.

re aftermath

asked When began

jeff

but

deep

me?” busy to relax

did and to

of

( subject in

.

But to

and Gardiner,

after teach visit .

Vienna.

saw

losses, Tell

her

power” for she In bear,

then death

“H

understanding

Vienna

and him to this Gardiner she

those

e

insurance the

the political the

and always on do

cry me me

of and to

London

including talk

to was entered

the of

Soviet

the Nazi Wolf it?

the

( the Mack

1971, his Russian…after and

why

Gardiner, streets.

walk I his early

about

following had

not

street,

Bolshevik Why was enjoyed greatest

sobbing

wring reasons, takeover

admired

Man

policies.

if she

Union

Bruns the medical p drunk the

days

of

. Marie he impressed

more

He did

311).

at few ki

periodically

human case 1971, could his

lled

. did wick, misfortunes. a and

were

of this year tea

if older

revolution.

To

of

time interesting

Bonaparte

steps hands

school for

Gardiner someone devoting the

not

together

Austria profited herself” p find prepare , have

nature,

utterly . on by

also

them;

when sister 312). greet Nazi with

and

her the his

in to in a .

32

Psychoanalytic Discourse liberal The models about athletics 1983 had then writes, differences 1975 Her millionaires. fortune her wealthy his substitute side privilege Helen through The the How and in for on weeks ( Isenberg,

as

getting

him.

mother Life

business the

Victorian

in any marriage

tics, much a ) women

Did ,

,

World

Muriel

of arts a but

“I

p she

concentration

from

of elite household meat .

and

understanding But

with analysis a

was

an for

10). out

she danger 2010,

a school. who moth could between

.

Formerly

social

Heiress “Listening

in commitments - W

Muriel

her Morris no of

of a mother, packing Her had School

had decided ar

t Gardiner’s

the and Gardiner’s

not p.118

a

in husband of

I

father a with activities. happy H

inherited

country, and ’s Paris

destruction the beloved butterfly er find was to

camps”

Wealthy s opened emotionally

),

businesses

mother he

of a

numerous to Victorian

rich

the

died

Gardiner within the Chicago child. and

. his said,

these

and parents family

Russian

At

Gardiner and money Irish

youngest

S ( just pained, phobia, London up Gardiner,

studied

he

Russian

was

from their her I

her problems

the

was a

sensibility. prior

developed servants, nurse

in Meat

obtained absent

attended

wider united family from not

mother poor.

Revolution. within

the father’s . obsessiona

compulsive tortured

reflected of there

Comparing to

- Émigré

someone and packing

1971,

4 her infamous

her

parents. world

two or and

children including

She

as

for

a the

an focused

father Wellesley

12 They the

death,

housekeeper by

were p

she

families

that

interest in one

. had th l necessary

for

Fortune

314). neurotic

she questioning,

suffering

‘habits’ birthday

Pre

Certain planned

Pank S

Gustavus lived

it

Chicago my year

raised so her, he

Muriel

a could seemed - on

belo

and

many barely Jewish in that e College .

in jeff and her

Come

Her and current symptoms:

in

teachers when

to docu ved from Post a

they speak

had

and

mansion Swift, a stockyards. to own become she a

advantages,

rituals.

knew

older I

friends family

nurse “bizarre

- those realized ,

ments

to

War

earned whom could he

her

events a excelled

to

Play social

now

became was prestigious

sister her

intimately

who

Vienna?

siblings who

at

an

of on from No

and

cause”

she luxury” first

enormous

a father again

47. inherited

and educator great

Chicago’s

life one graduated was Pivotal

“And lives

Born in

he Nazi learned

admired night At read

her

at that all among wealth a because

had (

(

depended Gardine his

nurturing to women’s Webster

yet,” that in

brutality

intently became studies, a herself. Role

terrors,

he do wealth

nother

death,

a 1901, about

south

from

time

was role few this and she the

of in r, ,

33

Psychoanalytic Discourse Russian; to patients’ less thei 4 published who feminist 3 world. to armed 2 Dr father analysand, failure to By examiners she identifi which never a proceeds slept to Another of cause. news leader name Gardiner there,

“Many Mary Nicola

year,

think another. “become Vienna, . being

r

1926,

stringent

drowned Mack opinions once

on

robbery

and graduated

Shelley (Helen,

was went

the

involved they

then cation Sacco of Mary features She she knowing

in way

a

the

to determined

Gardiner

For

her

again examiners Gardiner “Red” 1818. religious

Brunswick knew were hoping a

than

Ruth independent

in helped and needy she

Wollstonecraft,

on and and

(1797 floor, prominent

example,

she

with a

marriage. of also

each boating tastes we likely

went he to sentenced Bartolomeo

because in analysis

demonstrated Mack or freed -

are

would 1851), university to

Mary medical campus

recognized start took

her

other; “Bolshie,” means

followed

more

innocent.

be to it insisted to now

accident

to was herself

mother’s

live Oxford at Brunswick judge be

analyzed the

daughter of

cold Shelley she to

Already and

openly

in be was that

Vanzetti

glad through

material death. test.

causes. avoiding school

left

a

some failed

very

students.

an They in she time

showers

different it

in

of to that

in

-

, and

her where 1822. English

of leaning

(and have

attending

Appeals

Chicago

her name)

even

do by the Dr

would ill were were

political “sensible”

, her

often

her

social and thing . independent .

T

an

as

Freud B

family extra terminology

She she

he

suggested

Though

she

exam Italian writer

executed that and

early

kind She

now

well American discussed a National

were and

s” contact

Sacco is

chose

philosopher work”

and wrote career

I

best

the

( to sold graduated

be

first

Gardiner, of married was

born when first as

filed only

and

address disapproved

at likely their

in known - life

trial

with over

met (Gardiner, the Vanzetti

them her a

to anarchists 1927, the but marriage as

Student mind

of thesis began

used she

p

from making

“the to name develop

patients;

hysician -

when William

denied,

a prized time committed,

the freely as knew

Percy

the Wellesley precipitating 1983 refused pediatrician.

Wolf the

“Muriel.” by

2

her on day.

1983a, of

a “Mary”

convicted problems contact she case Forum,

author she

with

Bysshe w

although

in a many Gardiner’s

3 Godwin - refusing

the book a Man”…when , family. - as

practicing the p year severe

did

to

. could patients;

figured p

life a

17).

.

of if United did

in condemn

Freud

36).

protests mistake Shel

for

not collection,

acquir

one in

the

and

analysis. there

of 1922, She

not

that

1921 She asceticism, She

ley, her

to

and While

recognize novel was

Mary

philosopher some States: object family. prominently

referred

was

ing became I and contributed

in comply

the

code

gave dropped of wanted likely lived and supporting

suicide

Frankenstein

analysts Vienna

much murder 4 Romantic riots

Shelley the

to at

analysts donating

she

name During up

their

to

in

Wellesley,

She

reputation

to a around

her

intending evidence and a

be with

luxuries,

possible Italy traveled

during her study as

were student

of

whose 3

stated later), in found

to poet to .

a

their

help

first

She

the this sin

her the the the his for

an

,

34

Psychoanalytic Discourse he education 7 Eissler. published 6 overdetermination” of 5 February to of Gardiner, partici attended with medical analyst unclear of 1983 much amicably She 1983 how the same. psychoanalytic to did she did. analysis,

Siegfried August Robert

the worked the education, transfer

the

end?

have thought

married

Gardiner wonderful! a a Waelder, Viennese

, ,

growing

pate more

Then summer p p Waelder agreed. Aichhorn

about

. . and Wayward school

an she with Bernfeld

My a 41). 41). 1934, the whose

in to few

psychoanalysis, unorthodox her wholeheartedly

Julian she asked

children

analysts she analysis

because

her spent an

famous adding

(This was Fascist

hour. at years

(1878 analysis Because break,

the

published

Youth (1892 said

daughter I’m American arranged

career

the a

a

Gardiner a prominent

Fascist

and who second

-

single

so pleasant

1949) later

- good of University is tutorials prominence in

Dr. 1953) Wednesday “we

for happy’ terminati

over?” goals, 1925

was had his

she

in and

.

B was

a

- was

his

1936.

favor

bye

She was Chancellor medical

analysis

been health). tutorial involved

shook

could smilingly Viennese about describing “undoubtedly” in

paper,

Sunday

a she with

just

a I

in Vi 1930

Still returned

displaced

Viennese exclaimed. on of of

ennese

education

in such

decided

not

3

hands, “The .

her

August Vienna to

evening

ended smiling, school , Austria

psychoanalyst, years

After

than afternoon

this

had read practice

wished

analyst,

of a psychoanalyst principle

during

to

psychoanalyst work. tone

as a

Austria

she I as

in old

three Freud analysis

Aich

in

to

helpful,

daughter had and

a Then

she meetings early

was

force

,

the of the wanted me

continue in

He

had that having of

horn

the years

been

answered

finality

the

war. famous with

multiple fall was

a I outlawed for usual 1937.)

-

decided with she remembered Nazi educator happy

she

6

U.S. who

social Connie

the ,

of

and during to

Dr tea

at

introduce (which

for with

was

analyst become Dr 1932

that wrote . in threat function:

the

as with

Robert Siegfried

Still “Yes.” change. critiquing

summer

.

who

to

Vienna

labor a B

always

end her the I in

,

about

lay

return

and asked, of the while planning

in

worked Freud

1931

to

a Observations

Heinz first of

career her Waelder

Germany. analyst,

In

unions Freud I psychoanalyst

“immediately

the thank

Melanie

and

was Bernfeld the eager at the

, to

to continuing

“Do

period”

link with and Kohut

the could

aftermath Freud session

the I

plans. to overjoyed. family.

her”

wished 5 between and

she

for

delinquents Klein . you then enter end

U.S.

and on She Though .

7

,

its enrolled

no ( ( the

which

Gardiner, Gardi

mean

L just on Kurt

of

divorced of

Then,

the to

planned because end

Though ater became and

her

WWI longer behalf Social

every

study

prior

field ‘Oh,

and

ner,

still and she she it’s her the

in in

35

Psychoanalytic Discourse “Mary” (Isenberg, Gardiner, Though friend Redgrave. 8 terms suffered neurosis. ( he Pankejeff When Post long home asked any returned as assisted whom she somewhat “ and For World active and lasted of Democratic

Gardiner, A There

it the ryanization” entered

the hid let way

had

passage

in Analysis

who

after to

a shooting,

would

- is involvemen nev War

the she

it Memoirs

this

next

for

week. Serge

claiming head become

from a 2010, to

Based she be

worked

er

returned

coda

protected

1971,

In being

analysis.

Wolf fell

several the job. II. party.

officially known

4

could.

they likely the i

reality,

p.

per

years,

on –

Pankejeff

to of Gardiner, U.S. 8

in

shouting

the 180). of

in

- Post

just

p displaced a International Man an iods

this

.

love story t the

Workers

to needed

years story 138

Vienna.

that

American admitted, with

be

by

when too

She Gardiner

story. This Russia

Austrian War

This Pankejeff of

titled terminated )

with her diagnosed

she was

dangerous.

that to depression was horrified continued and

the

prompted

is war

by

to In

go status “Pentimento” protested

autobiographical. wanted

indications

Woman and w and

resulted

resistance Austrian

rioting

1977,

She the the Rescue to escape devoted

hat

broke

needed

Paris married

later

war.

head as

Freud Gardiner by as his

worked

the

in

to these

and She an

of

in

the

from out

these

a

are

Committee movement. the

and

film assist married.

herself analysis underground

Frustrated of by American

a this

borderline

Austrian psychological obsessional

continued

that

referred

general Therese,

in Lillian efforts

the

Nazi London

to “Julia”

the

events, behind “It

strike

1939.

victims Hellman later

Revolutionary

to was, successful

Hellman in Underground.

takeover

In

helping

By

strike.

tell after was

formed by to

medical

from

the

to fact, in her recommitted personality 1914, In the

created her

as of

that the preoccupations June, see its released,

woman the

the

resistance

Julia’s

that the “the help own her

own scenes, Gardiner red

his

people

to

continued

analysis

of U.S.,

Freud war

student. a was

1938, strike

analyst’s

assist

story

way, tape

analyst, fictional breakthrough

for Socialists, life star Austria

he

supposedly as

(Blum

she

ring obtain sometimes closely herse

in . a

the involved,

had work pronounced

witness a refugees well.

plagiarism

of Thus

her

One few character

continued until Jane Gardiner

and

rest Pankejeff’s office. been

lf , and 1983

in resembled

the

1974

Joseph to

began In

the months

important

Fonda in ed Paris of

the

to political trying sh the pursuing

book papers,

1945,

tale

of contemporary

the based

terrified, ). his

e

The the

outbreak

left

Muriel’s

him

did

to of Gardiner’s and and systematic

Buttinger,

beginning

Code

Pankejeff Gardiner’s.

life.

after

Hellman’s

woman” to infantile on assist she fighting Vienna,

not

Vanessa money

person finally

cured. action

return Muriel when

Name

was life” last she but

He

of in

36

Psychoanalytic Discourse pride pursued. done obviously 9 of resentment He The and p doubt meeting: person. her of ver think which reports. maintain when quasi conversations 15 Vienna therapeutic In s saw When Bolshevik returned

upportive Leo .

316).

returning course

years

y addition

first

lost he

him with psychoanalytic and Rangell, extraordinary,

-

he

therapeutic Gardiner putting

he he

clearly

every

His

satisfaction Both postwar The proud later any for

In will his to “Considering contact is decompensated

this

Rev

help

toward connections

a or

Vienna suffering

air two after to to psychoanalytic

fortune

(Tomlinson letter ” summer Freud overcome

to me

tendency treasured olution. analytic

of Russia

(Reeves

left over this be

periods

visiting trip

ostentatiousness with

help, in

to

th

Freud

from

but

and in Vienna e community

him”

the

back “official” much

for

‘Wolf

during with

over

to

him,

1919,

that On experiences. pouring Pankejeff

, in

Mack role his was it

of

2008, try ( October quite , for

Rangell/Eissler, in

the his to 2018 soon…The

his

analysis. a Man,’ of

we

identity which

in

community to 1926

period encouraging of Austria always

‘Professor’

a the present

the

return,

Brunswick

a

protect 1938, had or p ). penniless

analyst,

psy

in out

rallied . while

which

, exhibitionism,

rest Eissler of 344). Bolshevik

1963,

Freud

he

chological never o

his

as

part 1971,

Post in f

he

The she mood

of

faithfully many he problems

his now, Freud’s

have

described

1949, 1963 troubles to

since saw considered

his

Similarly,

seemed

saw

-

referred of

émigré, been him had asked analytically, primary estate support

he

always

).

he life.

his seems years, Freud

Revolution Pankejeff

Gardiner his died

but wrote, to

help, exaggerates intimate, famous

to

their

illness

did to a which (Roazen

stay

rather

two obviously wear

him having

Viennese

him starting one in for those to he

the

meeting for

Pankejeff in the “Unfortunately

have

an

as a frequently

in to

he

patient. Wolf was and (

with trouble

regularly analysis

few Unterweger many

alysts he

a

a interim.

, who

Ruth

saw lost and

badge quiet

197

co in

such

in them Pankejeff was

with months

ntinued concrete friend,

Man

1953

a

5,

would

two his

years,

9

had reportedly way, Mack letter him

of

had amazingly a

in p

all for Kurt

used distinction. . Gardiner as

hold land

therapists and

Vienna 155). died

to

although

to /Gardiner

now

Albin of out

a “analytically

a

listen. sending the Brunswick be

were

fi Kurt

psychoanalytic

Eissler additional others likely on nancial and

number ” a of

depression,

are ( source

For

Gardiner,

him Eissler. harbored

Unterweger,

in proportion;

able open unreserved, described fortune

Yet

For in

by ending

1919

, for her a

who

that 1971

Vienna

assistance. of

number this when to

no of

example, who

analysis forms

deep “He periodic directed

meet

instead

I visited was

means

quasi

).

to

19

about some don’t

from

their was

icon also

but

71, the On for not

no of of in to

- .

37

Psychoanalytic Discourse around of wealth. There Vienna?” play To several re something him served by importantly, psycholog maintained Muriel mostly which 1971, ( question, him requesting and steadily company, Brunswick he years Eissler/Gardiner miniscence

butterflies. the return collected

directed ( to a

Eissler/Gardiner

post

the

gave way are

pivotal

as

to marriage. of

write Gardiner B until

royalties - to other follow oth ically suggesting her

similarities termination, which

funds

she What of contact were him

the

she

each

money his developed

his of own

rol a And,

functioned

analysts.

question, a

and -

helped misnomer, to Freud, ,

up e retirement without was great provided was memoirs

Both

1953 went

papers June. in with help

to of when

to

, the a in

Gardiner’s

one

1953 deal

Freud his

course, ).

maintained

to

maintain sum him care him but neurotic

their

“How life

fee.

describing

as His

Pankejeff. When analysis he

of him

to

of ), in

also as an throughout

for

in solicited

of

of

was

satisfaction and life

include the

second 19

they

After

agent

the

did various a

a Pankejeff’s

$40 symptoms 50

Gardiner Freud’s

his

motivation

stable, formerly stories. then

not. Wolf

a

in

an book shared

at

-

lifelong the

presence

$50 some for

He

various money

analysis heiress

in age

wrote

She

his

ways. Wolf

Man’s

his

had .

if The case

includes

dollars

Gardiner published 63

Both

an

years, life, wealth

in comparatively gave then artwork.

commitment

become from

and

.

a psychoanalytic

to Man’s child Wolf in analyst.

study, Eissler

with month

so major For

grew a

the 94

him

why

a

Panke y

Chicago his that - hood

not

-

Man

helped Russian month year

ex lore

Freud

life a The

She colleagues

Mark

money, up

lat and did ample, psychoanalytic serious she Both just , jeff

-

course.

of er, and

by old

as wrote

Wolf

to

meager, the knew meat

Gardiner him

and

for psychoanalysis,

Brunswick’s

his lonely presumably found

psychoanalysis. the

émigré

entered mother they venues

but amateur Eissler -

Wolf

Man

sell

- post and

memoirs his

for packing Wolf when

even also

a some children

income.

Pankejeff,

presented -

analyses

in both who by hospitalization Man analysis and job

-

Man.

wrote

benefactors.

he and landscape pre

shared the

in

of fortune

at she

was case provided was as - matter

perhaps

response

his and Wolf

an

as amidst

to well encouraged The

He with with

living

papers doing

the an

study

suggested paintings, insurance

Gardiner post

-

come

painter, annuity worked Man

to phobia

title

as issues

Mack funds

more

great

- with

her? well care

to war that She and his

in to

is a

38

Psychoanalytic Discourse ( and psychiatrist Later, his Vienna years. came within and socialists. procured holiday not one many exemplified Closely causes, her commitments her anonymously gave extreme advantages while Chicago inequities young Gardiner’ Isenberg,

way

have wealth of the

background published

money to

men

growing when She those

the

child,

while

woods, State

gift, to power

related

asceticism, enough stockyards s

a

between

2010,

obtain and

The and organization. moved investment

factor rested

interested

by nor

Gardiner

she

by to

also funneling she that

women

in came

first up. using her a

Engels. friends

to were

p to rescued.

Austria the y

book or . allowing reflected was him

on rich 178). eat. daring this,

job book

Even

had denying to

necessary

a spoke

there

in exploitation had from

in

between

and carefully some very

He called at the and

Gardiner

He

an public and

the he Because

She

if He and

established

age

any poor, wore

herself her

funds Nazi unscrupulous was ever

she

to

conflicted much

Wolf peace herself Gardiner

came

cared

dangerous

T

sense papers 15, books a causes;

health

he inspired

did

orchestrated shoes even persecution read small

through

of became

to Man

of with

he from

about for Deadly

not

even of

enjoy his

in

was

if others. to

her

and

took

finally

only second

some

for about justice. is

from

it, his

know

leave to prominence, an

work

air

some Wellesley. career The part

prevention, as

her

a

the

join on example, home in impoverished

Innocents:

and

rescuer

of system a she about

felt

the her apartment Europe

the Origins

In the benefits in of limited

family. the these In basic

death.

in

realized

the ( her late winter

responsibility cared Gardiner, wealth her

particulars,

socialists it the

of

Austrian of

she

general children

he

that as Privately, comforts.

adult adolescence,

vantage she

of

of

signals.

Portraits U.S. Her

people and for

she the

was

the how

supported And

her family and studied she

life,

husband

1983 war by rented

never and

as Family,

mode inheritance. endangered

in resistance to she point. must privilege.

she

an of the in

They she

she

broke her took use and Behind a

of

, homicidal hiding likely

recei

analyst, danger and

p

of

she

trade

felt

rarely have a developed

home p could it Children of

as

The

on . marr

life. friend’s

to

out.

67

her

ved Private

a less had

when

leadership

sensed

the

support him -

business as child been union

6 She

ied for be or told cottage

educator 8).

a

Starting

guilty the a

adolescents scenes,

birthday

considered

for need,

periods

to

she

perio Who

travel observed often aware o When Property

political

Fascists that thers and

smooth several worthy

saved of in about

roles

d

best as

Kill

and

she her did

the the the

by he of or of of of

a

39

Psychoanalytic Discourse psychoanalysis. community Just techniques included Man museum. home supported have that Freud deepened fierce difficult ( to wa their relationship Anoth her unfamiliar; their about her in been As would time. Gardiner,

Gardiner. troubl

r

this work

as

trip had

as defeated. as friendship

been

friends; er her for said possibly A sense say,

well

example

to his e not

feelings

friend in way

over Anna political the many

or

In n.d.

in Europe.

and yours”

‘My

until Austria,

with

been also as

role of

to

Their

the 1972

, to to

Wolf the

For their Anna

theory

p

recalled,

young privacy began

of to name

she . Pr indicates, Anna

context

from

in understand the

claimed available 2).

years

Anna (

comrades live the about oudly backgrounds Gardiner,

but As only

was

psychoanalytic Freud’s Man’s Both

friends

of is

rest people with

a Freud.

in an

making

and on

Freud’s

J

“She

psychoanalysis. lonely surrounded her of hope

he ohn.

after

analyst of

were Pankejeff

the Gardiner

and

Gardiner’s

this

says,

restraint

friend that her

effort successful

n.d.

Gardiner’s who of had

They of

basis

I a

her if

childhood.

also

projects. and killed friendship,

life,

larger

, as salvation friends;

I

“I with a

could

p to

Muriel had

father’s

had

“her . boy of

the by

work felt

continued history she

that 5). as shape

my visit their

a point

a been

youngest known

myself living

gave not special analysis helpfulness an

whole commitment

But

Through to they

as mother Gardiner, (

Gardiner,

Gardiner death to and Interestingly, shared

important otherwise

about mattered able educators

anybody

first

money

the

with her each

discuss

crowd less preserve interest

child

to and Gardiner with

Hampstead

that

Gardiner’s professional rescue her

her. other choose as

“I and

and simultaneously

1983

then

of in to afford in surely to an a like in New figure

de

in

her patient

compassion other their

potential

Every in in Pankejeff, monstrated axe’”

trouble, their the work a

education,

bought ga my ,

another

-

Vienna each father’s p

Land

an helped largesse, ve . Nurseries families

Wolf

in forms

xii). own

and letters.

( time

long than

education. Isenberg, money

of

the

victims the Foundation, however

personal

o in

life

their

Man legacy bring of

supported

people ne, after as the began

this

Maresfield

official the the and Anna

support

very a Their in

to I

psychoanalytic

co work characters early

who

think relates 2010, the had them her

. revolutionary help

to

- Referring

met Freud lives. remote This much worker,

friends Nazis

spread: overcome annals first

looked to

the days, Gardiner appealed

it start together

p

him, Garden

people

legacy . to would

wrote Anna but 178). Wolf post

and is had

but her hip

the the

he

of to to to if a -

40

Psychoanalytic Discourse the published end, and Obholzer another seem sent Gardiner, hesitated, that identity this about When A practice. community ends Freud the ( willing kind ( also [which] Freud land. younger Gardiner, Gardiner,

Threat

Wolf Wolf

that interview

in would a

of

Pankejeff of

to the This Gardiner

“collected telegram highlights

benefiting

demonstration

and analysis not to

upholder only comrade have

-

Man

wrote, Man’s Wolf he until

to saying

1971, 1971,

new cooperate

serve only was had

the apologetically

psychoanalysts

from the

was

after

Man learned and

urging

land

“E tracked

to

Legacy stood desperate so p p

a his of the he as courage of . .

close sum exemplify

xi) xi). gave taking

well” an

the

Obholzer

wanted

needed the pleasure is Freud’s psychoanalytic

patient .

actively

him experienced

him

that the

Wolf

of Ruth Important

him me to basis

(

place.

to

Gardiner, money need

in

realm 90 an told

not

to

to

down.

had

“to

Man’s

who

go good Mack legacy, the

in

Austrian signed understand

years for

interview in

to

Obholzer

for against

inquire” the his

The

validity of

was,

for to the give

a stead explor

Brunswick

She

death.

money

the old. necessary community

book analyst’s the 1971,

identified journalist, a this

reconstruction

to

journalist any

contract unconscious…” proposed

throughout that development

him,

er

quote An that

of ( he former

Obholzer, she The

p when setting sort

.

d, psychoanalysis could ban”

he

266). she

assessment qualific

says

wanted

indeed, two

Anna

in of as Karin

did

that

who

he that patient firmly

( out

a interview,

the

not Obholzer, spoke his something

not

whole

His

returned

Freud 1980,

stipulated of

was and they ation

to

Obholzer,

he cooperate. to book personal

care

(

Freud’s study and “benefit”

Gardiner, who

over

speaks write

intrigued of

have follow

in

in again, p

as

for

definitively

only .

his

and

an

to

198

this

had a a similar 10). a

new, life books about a

period

the

Vienna, theorizing, unprecedented theory had “first

- quite

0, series

up the “the matter” as

“Muriel

served to

1971,

by but p book

Having

learned recently

the E, . of Wolf

when

-

written him. what only differently of class 7).

was

and of

also

tried

his explaining

psychoanalytic 1½

p

the

(p would conversations .

Gardiner

Kurt

Man one

he instrumental

she she 140). . as

intelligence

heard

Pankejeff’s

Initially years own

10). discovered

theoretical was by to

became

a

manner” had able

refers

prevent Eissler laymen clinical did

not in

In wary. Anna when case” from

read

that

this had and

not the

he be to

a ,

41

Psychoanalytic Discourse Pontalis, anything Man published, but Anna analysis of the is one are that him. in psychoanalysts, with outpouring to terribly are not everything In reading About sister importantly, his However, book,

less Freud’s this my

Freud’s

not obsession Wolf occur both sitting j is

ust by

his He he Freud

at a

the story, journalist the competent

far

his

the critique

because of

had

explains she writing

least Man’s obsession

as in

these danger ideas

- famous

Gardiner there, back

his of fetched” treatment

own

Wolf

had

the a loved this, what

and

with his

infantile in

and conversations that earlier dream…that to

of mind -

case

as

about they

travails , Man

Gardiner and of

parts, and

or

“In was the wolf a and psychoanalysis

he

critical they with ( psychoanalysis, was woman

Obholzer,

disliked history.

of , are knowledgeable his and psychoanalysis, primal

often

lauded the writing lost explained

neurosis

dream, than

the

and fail struggling psychoanalysts”

interpretation, the

way

French

were to as

of

did

who

Wolf to present

scene

scene,

the

the a the both woman

took writing

“I

to

of

see the 1980,

young

to and

dismayed

never

had

Anna Wolf picture by journalist

, relating. edition,

those

Man Eissler the

even in Wolf place

which to

- the that dreams?

day

but

plagued

p the

you man. who write places

anything

. Man’s thought

Freud,

idea

35) and who

if

I

problems. one who Man in

of dream

she and ( don’t he some live by

Obholzer,

However,

. which

a

wants

a

his

of

it

is

expressed

derives where

Throughout very

believe

cooperation him the says,

Gardiner postscript answers “I Nothing,

more complicates

psychoanalytic dependent much

where of

analysis as know,

have

publication

she

for

particular

money

his

“I much” He he

or

fro

they

1980,

the of

money find

promoted

never criticisms

believes

the

seems a less

who interest those m

as

dream to

question

offered book

the

in

know

the on

windows Ms. from far

( the through

p

the

Gardiner/Freud, he the had

context,

.

for

the book,

most of

things dream.

as 138).

cure.

O’s does claims new that interpretation, in

heroic follow everything

by

this

are so him. years decisions I

in

him, about

can determined

book

psychoanalysis

trying the

much

another’s

edition open apt, challenge the

are book. Certainly,

affected

But

believe

-

and, see. image with up Wolf

He

what than official miles very

and

trouble that to to

of

and perhaps

is of When

a Freud his

be

Man

1980

a mind.

others

so distasteful. by the

ruminative he

of scene you to the

critical The

apart, picture

can this

the

analysis

strongly version.

get

his Freud thought wr

wolves

). relates legacy

know.

it

traces failed

guide Wolf

older

book

most

iting does who help And

age, was

it’s To

of of ’s - ,

42

Psychoanalytic Discourse his well surprise. achievements. diagnostic about ends me Gardiner and 1983 torment a his is Obholzer p he feelings psychology “perennial some offering In least awfully absolute had but ( It Gardiner/Pontalis,

.

quavering

much is, 885). owed f

to charming working complained act, others.

experience

as ). to

this

however, the change of

the

It me”

Gardiner

of well

were in and explanations disregard

the

The remained book. One is paper rightly

his achievements

her impressions, neurosis”

this

of (

capacity, irresolution often

Wolf

Freud/Gardiner,

in my old

London automatically

talks inner

taped personalities

about interesting, As by answering With judgment with

suspected

previous world wrote

felt for

Man’s

quoting

resolute and happens 1980 life

conversations

her all the

historical based really and Review (

Gardiner, thinks represents

ways,

a

).

are the saying in developmental tarnishing

that

reasoned complaints

evaluation expressed

her that

,

Anna Anna

and

these

aroused neglected. on stating, so far such malicious

1980

he so psychoanalysis of

with

there

truth. often her above gives

she

much

was

Books Freud Freud

tapes, 1983b, as a ).

of critique, with

long great judgment

toward “I was gratitude,

of

the appreciates

a in to

Obholzer her

a

everything

about have

ruthless things Freud’s

One

perspective,

from responded,

assessed there a valuable the him

more relationship Wolf

dignity

father’s p diagnostic

.

most

does

aging found adding

the

which

891). still a against

is written to whom

Man’s,

treatment” 1970 old is

abnormal

a the

and wonder people the the legacy picture just

h

else,

process

bitter

nothing a

codger admitting

will facts s Anna story

he

book letter

the with

discussion, “Obholzer, restraint, “bit to

one recentl

could and

liked

. contend

who grieve

, Master awaren why

of

“I

than

of

correcting Freud

( parts…that

at the

with with and that in Gardiner, why

am

one them.

y

not or

were the

Obholzer’s she there

Wolf

dutiful

and

about

to

Muriel predates not

scores

loved” a ess

and

comments this

with,

side this know

end different not had

his

kind

surprised I totally was

than

man. his

think was

misinformation

1983b,

my

gratitud comes the psychology,

of in not

familiar

about to

Gardiner (

that

cures” such Gardiner, to

this

this

the the

settle.

never record normal

father,

read you

convincing,

him, She on slant.

p

his after case complete controversy almost Wolf incorrigible e, the

.

Gardiner’s

have

( 895).

the

attributes Ignatieff and seriously

with . to

negative

to Beneath and sides

normal history

1983b, having “Karin For

-

whom to Man” book cause

there done

as

She and

the the hi

all of as

at a s , ,

43

Psychoanalytic Discourse Psychoanalytic Blum, References effect I omnipotence” tha he treatment about Anna psychoanalysis Without years, Gardiner spoke history. psychological Gardiner’s the of reconstruction of record about In come aff

will

ected a the t would question psychoanalysis,

letter is

a let

was the Freud’s her

to she validity

H of bout;

one

When . again.

the such

the

what

the now techn have father’s (1974). has quoted salutary,

efforts

complicated of Wolf the

of

Wolf

.

friendships never

well

1970

and and of

a Gardiner she

ical cure been can Association

But failures fiercely the

his

earlier,

contribu Man

- on his construc The published

Man’s advances being in

; be

lost letter

then cured how the ideas modern

any

behalf earliest truly

borderline have

are agrees, her

, loyal

truth.

Anna

Wolf one

effective and event. concludes, as analysis tions. in completely tion

,

meaningful”

much

faith

22

the of they the

in

contrast usually mother

such analytic

and

,

Freud

“It of psychoanalysis. the

“Neither

Man 721 final book

But

in Certainly,

also more

the

childhood

is

and it compassionate

faith, Wolf his -

742. - was rewarding it

“There

relationship does word. Wolf complains

to

about carried

supported with

was follow

ability delusions. obvious.”

Jung’s

(Stewart

have and as Man

not

not

Man’s

no Obholzer’s the many

About

of

was how -

to

I” up.

a know supported

a obsessional

to Wolf

and the

complete Somebody about keep ( the

,

heavy

Gardiner,

had a note friend infantile 1971 thorough of

As

his Wolf recent

Adler’s.

I

Wolf

in

us Man,

been the

the

have the from

analysis

).

book detail

are

she

burden.

his Man. healthy

living cure”

Man’s

discussion “disregard the neurosis

or analyzed

1983b,

or said already

the

has never

material complicated

The other

how permanent New

with

Wolf

(Obholzer Journal

record if been

place parts

Obholzer

the

the p

Freud residues believed York as

aware, . (in Freud,

— for 897). Man’s in

well

scientific Wolf

analytic of

in of

the how,

the of

historical

Times his

it psychoanalytic or , Freud’s -

presented

1980, being transference),

no the

was he

book

Man Society

letters left!

enriches mind through in

amount

said, American successes .

evidence reviewer

analytic p

were and opened

I

theory . i

truth” to

ntact. 138). think “The

here

Dr. the the his his

of in

44

Psychoanalytic Discourse Review Years Ignatieff, Psychoanalytic Gardiner, Austrian Gardiner, Most Gardiner, Washington, Papers, Gardiner, Sigmund Gardiner, Freud Gardiner, Freud Freud, Washington, Papers, Eissler,

Famous

Collection, Archives, Later A/Gardiner,

of K/Gardiner,

Underground Sigmund Sigmund

Freud

M M/Freud, M. Books M M/Pontalis, M. M , .

.

. D.C. D.C.

(1983

(Ed). by

Cas (1983 (n.d.).

(1983b). Asso

Collection,

, Manuscript

K.

by

Man e

.

, (1971). M

A.

a

Freud Freud New ciation Obholzer Februrary V. M ). .

Personal uscript (1980). (1980). . M

(1953). Brome].

New Code

. York:

(1980).

The The , Manuscript

Collection, Collection, Division, 31

Haven:

Division,

and

Letter Letter

Name

, 3

Wolf

Recollections Basic 867 Wolf ). Le London

tters the Last - Letter -

897.

Man of of

Yale

“Mary”: Books. Library

Man’s

book

Division,

Library 7/20/80. 3/29/80.

of Word Review Manuscript Manuscript

by University 3/23/53 of

the Ernest

4/16/80. of of

[ Last

Review of Memoirs

of

Wolf Box Congress, Box Library Anna

Congress,

Books

and

Years. Jones:

1, 1, - Press.

Man: Division, Division,

4/16/53. Muriel Muriel of Freud. Box

, of of

5

the

Washington,

(2),

Congress,

Freud’s an

The Washington, 5,

Journal

book

Gardiner Gardiner

23.

American

Muriel Box Double Box Library Library

The

Alter

3,

1, Washington,

of

Gardiner

Papers, Papers, Muriel D.C. Wolf Story Muriel

D.C. Woman the Ego. of of

-

Man:

of Congress, Congress,

American

Sigmund Sigmund Gardiner Gardiner

Freud’s London Papers,

in D.C.

Sixty

the

45

Psychoanalytic Discourse Society Association Webster, Sigmund Unterweger, Psychoanalytic To of Stewart, Roazen, 2 Attachment; Reeves, Freud Rangell, Controversial Obholzer, York: Isenberg, (3)

Freud’s m , linson,

343

Collection, Palgrave

and

R P RS L/Eissl

-

B. Freud

348. S . .

Most K (1975). .

(2008).

.

C

(1975, Institute Oral

. (2010). (1971 A/Gardiner, New

.

Patient (1980). (2018

Macmillan. Association er, Collection, F

Hist

Manuscript amous

Di

,

K December).

Freud May

Review ,

rections Archives, (1963).

ory . Muriel’s

February

New The

9

Case. Workshop, M

). and

Manuscript

.

Oral

Review York: of

(1971). Wolf

Letter Division, in

His ).

War: Boston, Interview The The

Psychotherapy History The -

Man Followers. Continuum.

New of

Analysand’s

of Oral An

Letter

Wolf 11/27/63.

The Massachusett Division, Library

Sixty American

York with Workshop History

Wolf Man: of

Times Muriel Years

New

10/22/71.

of

-

and

Box

Man Library Tale Past

Transcripts.

Congress, Heiress

.

, York:

Later: 6 Relational Gardiner.

1,

by and - by 7.

Muriel

the

of Robert Box

Da Present

in Congress,

Conversations Wolf Washington,

Capo The the 2,

Gardiner

American

Psychoanalysis Muriel - Morley

Man: Nazi Encounters. Boston

Press.

Washington,

Resistance

The

Gardiner Papers,

(Karnac,

D.C. Psychoanalytic Psychoanalytic

with Double

American

Sigmund Journal

Freud’s Papers,

. 2007).

D.C. Story New

,

46

Psychoanalytic Discourse