ISSN 1 Abstract Erika M
Chicago uriel 2472 l’histoire conserver d’autres soutenu ta savoir ainsi de Le psychoanalysis. Wolf the emotional as suffered and Freud’s Freud’s
Schmidt nt
Freud
cas a G
psychoanalytic
Psychoanalytic que
2472
by
ardiner que Man. psychoanalyst,
son de
legacy
case the
from
psychanalyste,
émotivement
qui dans
de
par « MSW angoisse and la
l’homme
Gardiner realities This
a study
version
and
significant lesréalités
, été material
l’établissement which 1
Institute
paper
menacé
the
known
et establishment
of
au
became dans
dépression was freudienne W
ainsi
support
tells
deviendra
the loup olf de anxiety
Psychoanalytic
par as
threatened
le
la
M
Wolf “The Gardiner’s que
contexte l’état »
an intertwined vie
psychanalytique maintien to
and considérable.
:
matériellement. worked de Wolf entrelacée P de him.
Man’s politique reserving
depression.
by l’h
l’homme de
Man” psychoanalytic story omme
Gardin une l’histoire
to post with
de preserve
à version
in
preserved
a Muriel -
celle termination
la er, au
au
legacy
the the ont
Discourse Muriel
psychanalyse
Gardiner, de loup Anna loup.
context de
classi Wolf
la fait Gardiner, Freud’s
politics
l’homme
psychanalyse.
a
après
Gardiner,
Freud
Cet classical un
que
Man’s, life
of
Anna
article
effort son
version
du after
the dont and après
in
au
patrimoine
whose
analyse, version history
which
Freud provided others his
loup, la
afin sa raconte
Volume
of vie
death
mort
life
the
l’a he de en of of
in et à
4,
Issue
1
- 30
May
Psychoanalytic Discourse ,
2019
Man decided 1929 Muriel The significant I reputation Her experience, Muriel theory analytic represented support the two reality, of The environment, community life cured. ended uncover the psychoanalytic “From
tell
Fre
rest steps
for
with story
friendship Beginning . and the
ud’s
his
and
In
recurrence
Gardiner’s the
the Her s of Gardiner from she
community
knew
story in
Ruth the reality, of analysis
as his
friends technique, Wolf theory
History providing the
was the wanted the
analyst,
unconscious Anna therapists
and
life,
that Mack
of
canon. with
making
of Wolf
possibilities a
Man
the
lso
Muriel the
played
of and and in
a relationship he he
Freud
of
to
Beautiful
tried Anna
Wolf 1914, symptoms Brunswick
a Wolf Ruth could Man’s suffered
even friendship, had
patrons. technique an
learn source In and of
Gardiner
an devoted meaning to this
Infantile three
a Man
Freud just Man
though Mack
use
the
neurosis
insure to treatment important of
text,
of
from
Friendship
to
be speak
additional relied analytic
. and additional took
the
and support financial fore Though reinforced the
herself Brunswick,
and they of
Neurosis” Freud
that
for symptoms,
analytic
and pride
symptoms Freud Wolf on Russian.
the
with
how
characterological recognized he community. role
psychotherapeutic
demonstrates for to outbreak
pres income. he
periods support
in
could
Man
Freud
pronounced she preserving
her
achieved
him,
in his process.
ents holds
provided
was
Mack
came that
the
began interest identity
be
documented of functioning and his Gardiner, of his
easily a
the leads Wolf
analysis, As
World
theory Brunswick
to place a
a precarious the her innocuously
The
modicum
living
link
him an Freud’s be difficulties. in as
to
dysregulated
way
Man’s
fath
help
Freud’s maintaining
one
introduction
of
War involved
standard a to of cured
one
cure. as the
documentation
er’s
special the
psychoanalytic infantile for
of
most
I,
somet also
psychological
of revolutionary
briefly life
psychoanalytic the
legacy. Freud
most after most
enough
When stability,
The in
bearers
analyzed famous importance Wolf afte
hing
and left
the sexuality, of termination.
famous when considered with psychoanalytic
r the
-
the
In
wing depended in of Wolf his Man’s
throughout
wi of this
patient,
Wolf Freud
Vienna
rest technique a
the Gardiner potential stability.
thin analytic
holding Freud’s patient. politics
world. Man’s paper,
in traces
of
Wolf most Man
him
and
the the
his
on he In in
31
Psychoanalytic Discourse way way She probable w Clearly, tenor ( What happen In in were regime, learned me this unintelligible. pour me “I Contrast his 1932, art, by things: a every herself, since Gardiner,
conscientious ho
came fact, telling
his
capacity
in
to
and
was could
there. back
committed out
Jewish
her
of
Gardiner Wednesday his shall my acute
Pank Dostoevsky,
she
to
face that there his
Gardiner psychoanalysis”
not this
suicide, a days
usual
Gardiner to
apartment
see me? 1971,
flood
Bringing began
refrain,
I
as e observations the
only
to or his
with jeff
do,
was he at
an
Alarmed face no polite involved
hour
U.S.,
I suicide
Wellesley wife
p
of needed
and
“scarcely
ina
Frau heard always insurance . Russian their afternoon an longer
312). of
“Why
with words
Freud, dvisable where
all to
of upsurge and agreed had this
Doktor?
meeting Russian
her echoes his
when
that
help,
the
in had They ( which have
ce did Gardiner, trauma, lessons recently
which
College,
even
estate dangerous we connections or
salesman remonious Wolf
while
he
to
time but
this in
but he
the
bad
met could
of
see
grammar, was in
grew knew
the
Tell even was
because and
Pank
analysts Man
have with French
to 1938, he he
several luck. him committed
had
making 1971, number
study
talk so
fortune out sobbed, patiently
19 me political
the
dangerous, e Serge on
manner
to
a first jeff’s and
he , a
of vague
I’m in happen
of one Impressionists…I we of Nazis what
were few
more Russian, p could
a
. resources
privacy” in i us
his of his
in
would 311). history Pank really “Why
always of
,
months
suicide
Paris work. trie
conspicuous suicides the
plan fleeing but to
we times father’s excitement the
renew
to
I d e
do.
re aftermath
asked When began
jeff
but
deep
me?” busy to relax
did and to
of
( subject in
.
But to
and Gardiner,
after teach visit .
Vienna.
saw
losses, Tell
her
power” for she In bear,
then death
“H
understanding
Vienna
and him to this Gardiner she
those
e
insurance the
the political the
and always on do
cry me me
of and to
London
including talk
to was entered
the of
Soviet
the Nazi Wolf it?
the
( the Mack
1971, his Russian…after and
why
Gardiner, streets.
walk I his early
about
following had
not
street,
Bolshevik Why was enjoyed greatest
sobbing
wring reasons, takeover
admired
Man
policies.
if she
Union
Bruns the medical p drunk the
days
of
. Marie he impressed
more
He did
311).
at few ki
periodically
human case 1971, could his
lled
. did wick, misfortunes. a and
were
of this year tea
if older
revolution.
To
of
time interesting
Bonaparte
steps hands
school for
Gardiner someone devoting the
not
together
Austria profited herself” p find prepare , have
nature,
utterly . on by
also
them;
when sister 312). greet Nazi with
and
her the his
in to in a .
32
Psychoanalytic Discourse liberal The models about athletics 1983 had then writes, differences 1975 Her millionaires. fortune her wealthy his substitute side privilege Helen through The the How and in for on weeks ( Isenberg,
as
getting
him.
mother Life
business the
Victorian
in any marriage
tics, much a ) women
Did ,
,
World
Muriel
of arts a but
“I
p she
concentration
from
of elite household meat .
and
understanding But
with analysis a
was
an for
10). out
she danger 2010,
a school. who moth could between
.
Formerly
social
Heiress “Listening
in commitments - W
Muriel
her Morris no of
of a mother, packing Her had School
had decided ar
t Gardiner’s
the and Gardiner’s
not p.118
a
in husband of
I
father a with activities. happy H
inherited
country, and ’s Paris
destruction the beloved butterfly er find was to
camps”
Wealthy s opened emotionally
),
businesses
mother he
of a
numerous to Victorian
rich
the
died
Gardiner within the Chicago child. and
. his said,
these
and parents family
Russian
At
Gardiner and money Irish
youngest
S ( just pained, phobia, London up Gardiner,
studied
he
Russian
was
from their her I
her problems
the
was a
sensibility. prior
developed servants, nurse
in Meat
obtained absent
attended
wider united family from not
mother poor.
Revolution. within
the father’s . obsessiona
compulsive tortured
reflected of there
Comparing to
- Émigré
someone and packing
1971,
4 her infamous
her
parents. world
two or and
children including
She
as
for
a the
an focused
father Wellesley
12 They the
death,
housekeeper by
were p
she
families
that
interest in one
. had th l necessary
for
Fortune
314). neurotic
she questioning,
suffering
‘habits’ birthday
Pre
Certain planned
Pank S
Gustavus lived
it
Chicago my year
raised so her, he
Muriel
a could seemed - on
belo
and
many barely Jewish in that e College .
in jeff and her
Come
Her and current symptoms:
in
teachers when
to docu ved from Post a
they speak
had
and
mansion Swift, a stockyards. to own become she a
advantages,
rituals.
knew
older I
friends family
nurse “bizarre
- those realized ,
ments
to
War
earned whom could he
her
events a excelled
to
Play social
now
became was prestigious
sister her
intimately
who
Vienna?
siblings who
at
an
of on from No
and
cause”
she luxury” first
enormous
a father again
47. inherited
and educator great
Chicago’s
life one graduated was Pivotal
“And lives
Born in
he Nazi learned
admired night At read
her
at that all among wealth a because
had (
(
depended Gardine his
nurturing to women’s Webster
yet,” that in
brutality
intently became studies, a herself. Role
terrors,
he do wealth
nother
death,
a 1901, about
south
from
time
was role few this and she the
of in r, ,
33
Psychoanalytic Discourse Russian; to patients’ less thei 4 published who feminist 3 world. to armed 2 Dr father analysand, failure to By examiners she identifi which never a proceeds slept to Another of cause. news leader name Gardiner there,
“Many Mary Nicola
year,
think another. “become Vienna, . being
r
1926,
stringent
drowned Mack opinions once
on
robbery
and graduated
Shelley (Helen,
was went
the
involved they
then cation Sacco of Mary features She she knowing
in way
a
the
to determined
Gardiner
For
her
again examiners Gardiner “Red” 1818. religious
Brunswick knew were hoping a
than
Ruth independent
in helped and needy she
Wollstonecraft,
on and and
(1797 floor, prominent
example,
she
with a
marriage. of also
each boating tastes we likely
went he to sentenced Bartolomeo
because in analysis
demonstrated Mack or freed -
are
would 1851), university to
Mary medical campus
recognized start took
her
other; “Bolshie,” means
followed
more
innocent.
be to it insisted to now
accident
to was herself
mother’s
live Oxford at Brunswick judge be
analyzed the
daughter of
cold Shelley she to
Already and
openly
in be was that
Vanzetti
glad through
material death. test.
causes. avoiding school
left
a
some failed
very
students.
an They in she time
showers
different it
in
of to that
in
-
, and
her where 1822. English
of leaning
(and have
attending
Appeals
Chicago
her name)
even
do by the Dr
would ill were were
political “sensible”
, her
often
her
social and thing . independent .
T
an
as
Freud B
family extra terminology
She she
he
suggested
Though
she
exam Italian writer
executed that and
early
kind She
now
well American discussed a National
were and
s” contact
Sacco is
chose
philosopher work”
and wrote career
I
best
the
( to sold graduated
be
first
Gardiner, of married was
born when first as
filed only
and
address disapproved
at likely their
in known - life
trial
with over
met (Gardiner, the Vanzetti
them her a
to anarchists 1927, the but marriage as
Student mind
of thesis began
used she
p
from making
“the to name develop
patients;
hysician -
when William
denied,
a prized time committed,
the freely as knew
Percy
the Wellesley precipitating 1983 refused pediatrician.
Wolf the
“Muriel.” by
2
her on day.
1983a, of
a “Mary”
convicted problems contact she case Forum,
author she
with
Bysshe w
although
in a many Gardiner’s
3 Godwin - refusing
the book a Man”…when , family. - as
practicing the p year severe
did
to
. could patients;
figured p
life a
17).
.
of if United did
in condemn
Freud
36).
protests mistake Shel
for
not collection,
acquir
one in
the
and
analysis. there
of 1922, She
not
that
1921 She asceticism, She
ley, her
to
and While
recognize novel was
Mary
philosopher some States: object family. prominently
referred
was
ing became I and contributed
in comply
the
code
gave dropped of wanted likely lived and supporting
suicide
Frankenstein
analysts Vienna
much murder 4 Romantic riots
Shelley the
to at
analysts donating
she
name During up
their
to
in
Wellesley,
She
reputation
to a around
her
intending evidence and a
be with
luxuries,
possible Italy traveled
during her study as
were student
of
whose 3
stated later), in found
to poet to .
a
their
help
first
She
the this sin
her the the the his for
an
,
34
Psychoanalytic Discourse he education 7 Eissler. published 6 overdetermination” of 5 February to of Gardiner, partici attended with medical analyst unclear of 1983 much amicably She 1983 how the same. psychoanalytic to did she did. analysis,
Siegfried August Robert
the worked the education, transfer
the
end?
have thought
married
Gardiner wonderful! a a Waelder, Viennese
, ,
growing
pate more
Then summer p p Waelder agreed. Aichhorn
about
. . and Wayward school
an she with Bernfeld
My a 41). 41). 1934, the whose
in to few
psychoanalysis, unorthodox her wholeheartedly
Julian she asked
children
analysts she analysis
because
her spent an
famous adding
(This was Fascist
hour. at years
(1878 analysis Because break,
the
published
Youth (1892 said
daughter I’m American arranged
career
the a
a
Gardiner a prominent
Fascist
and who second
-
single
so pleasant
1949) later
- good of University is tutorials prominence in
Dr. 1953) Wednesday “we
for happy’ terminati
over?” goals, 1925
was had his
she
in and
.
B was
a
- was
his
1936.
favor
bye
She was Chancellor medical
analysis
been health). tutorial involved
shook
could smilingly Viennese about describing “undoubtedly” in
paper,
Sunday
a she with
just
a I
in Vi 1930
Still returned
displaced
Viennese exclaimed. on of of
ennese
education
in such
decided
not
3
hands, “The .
her
August Vienna to
evening
ended smiling, school , Austria
psychoanalyst, years
After
than afternoon
this
had read practice
wished
analyst,
of a psychoanalyst principle
during
to
psychoanalyst work. tone
as a
Austria
she I as
in old
three Freud analysis
Aich
in
to
helpful,
daughter had and
a Then
she meetings early
was
force
,
the of the wanted me
continue in
He
had that having of
horn
the years
been
answered
finality
the
war. famous with
multiple fall was
a I outlawed for usual 1937.)
-
decided with she remembered Nazi educator happy
she
6
U.S. who
social Connie
the ,
of
and during to
Dr tea
at
introduce (which
for with
was
analyst become Dr 1932
that wrote . in threat function:
the
as with
Robert Siegfried
Still “Yes.” change. critiquing
summer
.
who
to
Vienna
labor a B
always
end her the I in
,
about
lay
return
and asked, of the while planning
in
worked Freud
1931
to
a Observations
Heinz first of
career her Waelder
Germany. analyst,
In
unions Freud I psychoanalyst
“immediately
the thank
Melanie
and
was Bernfeld the eager at the
, to
to continuing
“Do
period”
link with and Kohut
the could
aftermath Freud session
the I
plans. to overjoyed. family.
her”
wished 5 between and
she
for
delinquents Klein . you then enter end
U.S.
and on She Though .
7
,
its enrolled
no ( ( the
which
Gardiner, Gardi
mean
L just on Kurt
of
divorced of
Then,
the to
planned because end
Though ater became and
her
WWI longer behalf Social
every
study
prior
field ‘Oh,
and
ner,
still and she she it’s her the
in in
35
Psychoanalytic Discourse “Mary” (Isenberg, Gardiner, Though friend Redgrave. 8 terms suffered neurosis. ( he Pankejeff When Post long home asked any returned as assisted whom she somewhat “ and For World active and lasted of Democratic
Gardiner, A There
it the ryanization” entered
the hid let way
had
passage
in Analysis
who
after to
a shooting,
would
- is involvemen nev War
the she
it Memoirs
this
next
for
week. Serge
claiming head become
from a 2010, to
Based she be
worked
er
returned
coda
protected
1971,
In being
analysis.
Wolf fell
several the job. II. party.
officially known
4
could.
they likely the i
reality,
p.
per
years,
on –
Pankejeff
to of Gardiner, U.S. 8
in
shouting
the 180). of
in
- Post
just
p displaced a International Man an iods
this
.
love story t the
Workers
to needed
years story 138
Vienna.
that
American admitted, with
be
by
when too
She Gardiner
story. This Russia
Austrian War
This Pankejeff of
titled terminated )
with her diagnosed
she was
dangerous.
that to depression was horrified continued and
the
prompted
is war
by
to In
go status “Pentimento” protested
autobiographical. wanted
indications
Woman and w and
resulted
resistance Austrian
rioting
1977,
She the the Rescue to escape devoted
hat
broke
needed
Paris married
later
war.
head as
Freud Gardiner by as his
worked
the
in
to these
and She an
of
in
the
from out
these
a
are
Committee movement. the
and
film assist married.
herself analysis underground
Frustrated of by American
a this
borderline
Austrian psychological obsessional
continued
that
referred
general Therese,
in Lillian efforts
the
Nazi London
to “Julia”
the
events, behind “It
strike
1939.
victims Hellman later
Revolutionary
to was, successful
Hellman in Underground.
takeover
In
helping
By
strike.
tell after was
formed by to
medical
from
the
to fact, in her recommitted personality 1914, In the
created her
as of
that the preoccupations June, see its released,
woman the
the
resistance
Julia’s
that the “the help own her
own scenes, Gardiner red
his
people
to
continued
analysis
of U.S.,
Freud war
student. a was
1938, strike
analyst’s
assist
story
way, tape
analyst, fictional breakthrough
for Socialists, life star Austria
he
supposedly as
(Blum
she
ring obtain sometimes closely herse
in . a
the involved,
had work pronounced
witness a refugees well.
plagiarism
of Thus
her
One few character
continued until Jane Gardiner
and
rest Pankejeff’s office. been
lf , and 1983
in resembled
the
1974
Joseph to
began In
the months
important
Fonda in ed Paris of
the
to political trying sh the pursuing
book papers,
1945,
tale
of contemporary
the based
terrified, ). his
e
The the
outbreak
left
Muriel’s
him
did
to of Gardiner’s and and systematic
Buttinger,
beginning
Code
Pankejeff Gardiner’s.
life.
after
Hellman’s
woman” to infantile on assist she fighting Vienna,
not
Vanessa money
person finally
cured. action
return Muriel when
Name
was life” last she but
He
of in
36
Psychoanalytic Discourse pride pursued. done obviously 9 of resentment He The and p doubt meeting: person. her of ver think which reports. maintain when quasi conversations 15 Vienna therapeutic In s saw When Bolshevik returned
upportive Leo .
316).
returning course
years
y addition
first
lost he
him with psychoanalytic and Rangell, extraordinary,
-
he
therapeutic Gardiner putting
he he
clearly
every
His
satisfaction Both postwar The proud later any for
In will his to “Considering contact is decompensated
this
Rev
help
toward connections
a or
Vienna suffering
air two after to to psychoanalytic
fortune
(Tomlinson letter ” summer Freud overcome
to me
tendency treasured olution. analytic
of Russia
(Reeves
left over this be
periods
visiting trip
ostentatiousness with
help, in
to
th
Freud
from
but
and in Vienna e community
him”
the
back “official” much
for
‘Wolf
during with
over
to
him,
1919,
that On experiences. pouring Pankejeff
, in
Mack role his was it
of
2008, try ( October quite , for
Rangell/Eissler, in
the his to 2018 soon…The
his
analysis. a Man,’ of
we
identity which
in
community to 1926
period encouraging of Austria always
‘Professor’
a the present
the
return,
Brunswick
a
protect 1938, had or p ). penniless
analyst,
psy
in out
rallied . while
which
, exhibitionism,
rest Eissler of 344). Bolshevik
1963,
Freud
he
chological never o
his
as
part 1971,
Post in f
he
The she mood
of
faithfully many he problems
his now, Freud’s
have
described
1949, 1963 troubles to
since saw considered
his
Similarly,
seemed
saw
-
referred of
émigré, been him had asked analytically, primary estate support
he
always
).
he life.
his seems years, Freud
Revolution Pankejeff
Gardiner his died
but wrote, to
help, exaggerates intimate, famous
to
their
illness
did to a which (Roazen
stay
rather
two obviously wear
him having
Viennese
him starting one in for those to he
the
meeting for
Pankejeff in the “Unfortunately
have
an
as a frequently
in to
he
patient. Wolf was and (
with trouble
regularly analysis
few Unterweger many
alysts he
a
a interim.
, who
Ruth
saw lost and
badge quiet
197
co in
such
in them Pankejeff was
with months
ntinued concrete friend,
Man
1953
a
5,
would
two his
years,
9
had reportedly way, Mack letter him
of
had amazingly a
in p
all for Kurt
used distinction. . Gardiner as
hold land
therapists and
Vienna 155). died
to
although
to /Gardiner
now
Albin of out
a “analytically
a
listen. sending the Brunswick be
were
fi Kurt
psychoanalytic
Eissler additional others likely on nancial and
number ” a of
depression,
are ( source
For
Gardiner,
him Eissler. harbored
Unterweger,
in proportion;
able open unreserved, described fortune
Yet
For in
by ending
1919
, for her a
who
that 1971
Vienna
assistance. of
number this when to
no of
example, who
analysis forms
deep “He periodic directed
meet
instead
I visited was
means
quasi
).
to
19
about some don’t
from
their was
icon also
but
71, the On for not
no of of in to
- .
37
Psychoanalytic Discourse around of wealth. There Vienna?” play To several re something him served by importantly, psycholog maintained Muriel mostly which 1971, ( question, him requesting and steadily company, Brunswick he years Eissler/Gardiner miniscence
butterflies. the return collected
directed ( to a
Eissler/Gardiner
post
the
gave way are
pivotal
as
to marriage. of
write Gardiner B until
royalties - to other follow oth ically suggesting her
similarities termination, which
funds
she What of contact were him
the
she
each
money his developed
his of own
rol a And,
functioned
analysts.
question, a
and -
helped misnomer, to Freud, ,
up e retirement without was great provided was memoirs
Both
1953 went
papers June. in with help
to of when
to
, the a in
Gardiner’s
one
1953 deal
Freud his
course, ).
maintained
to
maintain sum him care him but neurotic
their
“How life
fee.
describing
as His
Pankejeff. When analysis he
of him
to
of ), in
also as an throughout
for
in solicited
of
of
was
satisfaction and life
include the
second 19
they
After
agent
the
did various a
a Pankejeff’s
$40 symptoms 50
Gardiner Freud’s
his
motivation
stable, formerly stories. then
not. Wolf
a
in
an book shared
at
-
lifelong the
presence
$50 some for
He
various money
analysis heiress
in age
wrote
She
his
ways. Wolf
Man’s
his
had .
if The case
includes
dollars
Gardiner published 63
Both
an
years, life, wealth
in comparatively gave then artwork.
commitment
become from
and
.
a psychoanalytic
to Man’s child Wolf in analyst.
study, Eissler
with month
so major For
grew a
the 94
him
why
a
Panke y
Chicago his that - hood
not
-
Man
helped Russian month year
ex lore
Freud
life a The
She colleagues
Mark
money, up
lat and did ample, psychoanalytic serious she Both just , jeff
-
course.
of er, and
by old
as wrote
Wolf
to
meager, the knew meat
Gardiner him
and
for psychoanalysis,
Brunswick’s
his lonely presumably found
psychoanalysis. the
émigré
entered mother they venues
but amateur Eissler -
Wolf
Man
sell
- post and
memoirs his
for packing Wolf when
even also
a some children
income.
Pankejeff,
presented -
analyses
in both who by hospitalization Man analysis and job
-
Man.
wrote
benefactors.
he and landscape pre
shared the
in
of fortune
at she
was case provided was as - matter
perhaps
response
his and Wolf
an
as amidst
to well encouraged The
He with with
living
papers doing
the an
study
suggested paintings, insurance
Gardiner post
-
come
painter, annuity worked Man
to phobia
title
as issues
Mack funds
more
great
- with
her? well care
to war that She and his
in to
is a
38
Psychoanalytic Discourse ( and psychiatrist Later, his Vienna years. came within and socialists. procured holiday not one many exemplified Closely causes, her commitments her anonymously gave extreme advantages while Chicago inequities young Gardiner’ Isenberg,
way
have wealth of the
background published
money to
men
growing when She those
the
child,
while
woods, State
gift, to power
related
asceticism, enough stockyards s
a
between
2010,
obtain and
The and organization. moved investment
factor rested
interested
by nor
Gardiner
she
by to
also funneling she that
women
in came
first up. using her a
Engels. friends
to were
p to rescued.
Austria the y
book or . allowing reflected was him
on rich 178). eat. daring this,
job book
Even
had denying to
necessary
a spoke
there
in exploitation had from
in
between
and carefully some very
He called at the and
Gardiner
He
an public and
the he Because
She
if He and
established
age
any poor, wore
herself her
funds Nazi unscrupulous was ever
she
to
conflicted much
Wolf peace herself Gardiner
came
cared
dangerous
T
sense papers 15, books a causes;
health
he inspired
did
orchestrated shoes even persecution read small
through
of became
to Man
of with
he from
about for Deadly
not
even of
enjoy his
in
was
if others. to
her
and
took
finally
only second
some
for about justice. is
from
it, his
know
leave to prominence, an
work
air
some Wellesley. career The part
prevention, as
her
a
the
join on example, home in impoverished
Innocents:
and
rescuer
of system a she about
felt
the her apartment Europe
the Origins
In the benefits in of limited
family. the these In basic
death.
in
realized
the ( her late winter
responsibility cared Gardiner, wealth her
particulars,
socialists it the
of
Austrian of
she
general children
he
that as Privately, comforts.
adult adolescence,
vantage she
of
of
signals.
Portraits U.S. Her
people and for
she the
was
the how
supported And
her family and studied she
life,
husband
1983 war by rented
never and
as Family,
mode inheritance. endangered
in resistance to she point. must privilege.
she
an of the in
They she
she
broke her took use and Behind a
of
, homicidal hiding likely
recei
analyst, danger and
p
of
she
trade
felt
rarely have a developed
home p could it Children of
as
The
on . marr
life. friend’s
to
out.
67
her
ved Private
a less had
when
leadership
sensed
the
support him -
business as child been union
6 She
ied for be or told cottage
educator 8).
a
Starting
guilty the a
adolescents scenes,
birthday
considered
for need,
periods
to
she
perio Who
travel observed often aware o When Property
political
Fascists that thers and
smooth several worthy
saved of in about
roles
d
best as
Kill
and
she her did
the the the
by he of or of of of
a
39
Psychoanalytic Discourse psychoanalysis. community Just techniques included Man museum. home supported have that Freud deepened fierce difficult ( to wa their relationship Anoth her unfamiliar; their about her in been As would time. Gardiner,
Gardiner. troubl
r
this work
as
trip had
as defeated. as friendship
been
friends; er her for said possibly A sense say,
well
example
to his e not
feelings
friend in way
over Anna political the many
or
In n.d.
in Europe.
and yours”
‘My
until Austria,
with
been also as
role of
to
Their
the 1972
, to to
Wolf the
For their Anna
theory
p
recalled,
young privacy began
of to name
she . Pr indicates, Anna
context
from
in understand the
claimed available 2).
years
Anna (
comrades live the about oudly backgrounds Gardiner,
but As only
was
psychoanalytic Freud’s Man’s Both
friends
of is
rest people with
a Freud.
in an
making
and on
Freud’s
J
“She
psychoanalysis. lonely surrounded her of hope
he ohn.
after
analyst of
were Pankejeff
the Gardiner
and
Gardiner’s
this
says,
restraint
friend that her
effort successful
n.d.
Gardiner’s who of had
They of
basis
I a
her if
childhood.
also
projects. and killed friendship,
life,
larger
, as salvation friends;
I
“I with a
could
p to
Muriel had
father’s
had
“her . boy of
the by
work felt
continued history she
that 5). as shape
my visit their
a point
a been
youngest known
myself living
gave not special analysis helpfulness an
whole commitment
But
Through to they
as mother Gardiner, (
Gardiner,
Gardiner death to and Interestingly, shared
important otherwise
about mattered able educators
anybody
first
money
the
with her each
discuss
crowd less preserve interest
child
to and Gardiner with
Hampstead
that
Gardiner’s professional rescue her
her. other choose as
“I and
and simultaneously
1983
then
of in to afford in surely to an a like in New figure
de
in
her patient
compassion other their
potential
Every in in Pankejeff, monstrated axe’”
trouble, their the work a
education,
bought ga my ,
another
-
Vienna each father’s p
Land
an helped largesse, ve . Nurseries families
Wolf
in forms
xii). own
and letters.
( time
long than
education. Isenberg, money
of
the
victims the Foundation, however
personal
o in
life
their
Man legacy bring of
supported
people ne, after as the began
this
Maresfield
official the the and Anna
support
very a Their in
to I
psychoanalytic
co work characters early
who
think relates 2010, the had them her
. revolutionary help
to
- Referring
met Freud lives. remote This much worker,
friends Nazis
spread: overcome annals first
looked to
the days, Gardiner appealed
it start together
p
him, Garden
people
legacy . to would
wrote Anna but 178). Wolf post
and is had
but her hip
the the
he
of to to to if a -
40
Psychoanalytic Discourse the published end, and Obholzer another seem sent Gardiner, hesitated, that identity this about When A practice. community ends Freud the ( willing kind ( also [which] Freud land. younger Gardiner, Gardiner,
Threat
Wolf Wolf
that interview
in would a
of
Pankejeff of
to the This Gardiner
“collected telegram highlights
benefiting
demonstration
and analysis not to
upholder only comrade have
-
Man
wrote, Man’s Wolf he until
to saying
1971, 1971,
new cooperate
serve only was had
the apologetically
psychoanalysts
from the
was
after
Man learned and
urging
land
“E tracked
to
Legacy stood desperate so p p
a his of the he as courage of . .
close sum exemplify
xi) xi). gave taking
well” an
the
Obholzer
wanted
needed the pleasure is Freud’s psychoanalytic
patient .
actively
him experienced
him
that the
Wolf
of Ruth Important
him me to basis
(
place.
to
Gardiner, money need
in
realm 90 an told
not
to
to
down.
had
“to
Man’s
who
go good Mack legacy, the
in
Austrian signed understand
years for
interview in
to
Obholzer
for against
inquire” the his
The
validity of
was,
for to the give
a stead explor
Brunswick
She
death.
money
the old. necessary community
book analyst’s the 1971,
identified journalist, a this
reconstruction
to
journalist any
contract unconscious…” proposed
throughout that development
him,
er
quote An that
of ( he former
Obholzer, she The
p when setting sort
.
d, psychoanalysis could ban”
he
266). she
assessment qualific
says
wanted
indeed, two
Anna
in of as Karin
did
that
who
he that patient firmly
( out
a interview,
the
not Obholzer, spoke his something
not
whole
His
returned
Freud 1980,
stipulated of
was and they ation
to
Obholzer,
he cooperate. to book personal
care
(
Freud’s study and “benefit”
Gardiner, who
over
speaks write
intrigued of
have follow
in
in again, p
as
for
definitively
only .
his
and
an
to
198
this
had a a similar 10). a
new, life books about a
period
the
Vienna, theorizing, unprecedented theory had “first
- quite
0, series
up the “the matter” as
“Muriel
served to
1971,
by but p book
Having
learned recently
the E, . of Wolf
when
-
written him. what only differently of class 7).
was
and of
also
tried
his explaining
psychoanalytic 1½
p
the
(p would conversations .
Gardiner
Kurt
Man one
he instrumental
she she 140). . as
intelligence
heard
Pankejeff’s
Initially years own
10). discovered
theoretical was by to
became
a
manner” had able
refers
prevent Eissler laymen clinical did
not in
In wary. Anna when case” from
read
that
this had and
not the
he be to
a ,
41
Psychoanalytic Discourse Pontalis, anything Man published, but Anna analysis of the is one are that him. in psychoanalysts, with outpouring to terribly are not everything In reading About sister importantly, his However, book,
less Freud’s this my
Freud’s
not obsession Wolf occur both sitting j is
ust by
his He he Freud
at a
the story, journalist the competent
far
his
the critique
because of
had
explains she writing
least Man’s obsession
as in
these danger ideas
- famous
Gardiner there, back
his of fetched” treatment
own
Wolf
had
the a loved this, what
and
with his
transference infantile in
and conversations that earlier dream…that to
of mind -
case
as
about they
travails , Man
Gardiner and of
parts, and
or
“In was the wolf a and psychoanalysis
he
critical they with ( psychoanalysis, was woman
Obholzer,
disliked history.
of , are knowledgeable his and psychoanalysis, primal
often
lauded the writing lost explained
neurosis
dream, than
the
and fail struggling psychoanalysts”
interpretation, the
way
French
were to as
of
did
who
Wolf to present
scene
scene,
the
the a the both woman
took writing
“I
to
of
see the 1980,
young
to and
dismayed
never
had
Anna Wolf picture by journalist
, relating. edition,
those
Man Eissler the
even in Wolf place
which to
- the that dreams?
day
but
plagued
p the
you man. who write places
anything
. Man’s thought
Freud,
idea
35) and who
if
I
problems. one who Man in
of dream
she and ( don’t he some live by
Obholzer,
However,
. which
a
wants
a
his
of
it
is
expressed
derives where
Throughout very
believe
cooperation him the says,
Gardiner postscript answers “I Nothing,
more complicates
psychoanalytic dependent much
where of
analysis as know,
have
publication
she
for
particular
money
his
“I much” He he
or
fro
they
1980,
the of
money find
promoted
never criticisms
believes
the
seems a less
who interest those m
as
dream to
question
offered book
the
in
know
the on
windows Ms. from far
( the through
p
the
Gardiner/Freud, he the had
context,
.
for
the book,
most of
things dream.
as 138).
cure.
O’s does claims new that interpretation, in
heroic follow everything
by
this
are so him. years decisions I
in
him, about
can determined
book
psychoanalysis
trying the
much
another’s
edition open apt, challenge the
are book. Certainly,
affected
But
believe
-
and, see. image with up Wolf
He
what than official miles very
and
trouble that to to
of
and perhaps
is of When
a Freud his
be
Man
1980
a mind.
others
so distasteful. by the
ruminative he
of scene you to the
critical The
apart, picture
can this
the
analysis
strongly version.
get
his Freud thought wr
wolves
). relates legacy
know.
it
traces failed
guide Wolf
older
book
most
iting does who help And
age, was
it’s To
of of ’s - ,
42
Psychoanalytic Discourse his well surprise. achievements. diagnostic about ends me Gardiner and 1983 torment a his is Obholzer p he feelings psychology “perennial some offering In least awfully absolute had but ( It Gardiner/Pontalis,
.
quavering
much is, 885). owed f
to charming working complained act, others.
experience
as ). to
this
however, the change of
the
It me”
Gardiner
of well
were in and explanations disregard
the
The remained book. One is paper rightly
his achievements
her impressions, neurosis”
this
of (
capacity, irresolution often
Wolf
Freud/Gardiner,
in my old
London automatically
talks inner
taped personalities
about interesting, As by answering With judgment with
suspected
previous world wrote
felt for
Man’s
quoting
resolute and happens 1980 life
conversations
her all the
historical based really and Review (
Gardiner, thinks represents
ways,
a
).
are the saying in developmental tarnishing
that
reasoned complaints
evaluation expressed
her that
,
Anna Anna
and
these
aroused neglected. on stating, so far such malicious
1980
he so psychoanalysis of
with
there
truth. often her above gives
she
much
was
Books Freud Freud
tapes, 1983b, as a ).
of critique, with
long great judgment
toward “I was gratitude,
of
the appreciates
a in to
Obholzer her
a
everything
about have
ruthless things Freud’s
One
perspective,
from responded,
assessed there a valuable the him
more relationship Wolf
dignity
father’s p diagnostic
.
most
does
aging found adding
the
which
891). still a against
is written to whom
Man’s,
treatment” 1970 old is
abnormal
a the
and wonder people the the legacy picture just
h
else,
process
bitter
nothing a
codger admitting
will facts s Anna story
he
book letter
the with
discussion, “Obholzer, restraint, “bit to
one recentl
could and
liked
. contend
who grieve
, Master awaren why
of
“I
than
of
correcting Freud
( parts…that
at the
with with and that in Gardiner, why
am
one them.
y
not or
were the
Obholzer’s she there
Wolf
dutiful
and
about
to
Muriel predates not
scores
loved” a ess
and
comments this
with,
side this know
end different not had
his
kind
surprised I totally was
than
man. his
think was
misinformation
1983b,
my
gratitud comes the psychology,
of in not
familiar
about to
Gardiner (
that
cures” such Gardiner, to
this
this
the the
settle.
never record normal
father,
read you
convincing,
him, She on slant.
p
his after case complete controversy almost Wolf incorrigible e, the
.
Gardiner’s
have
( 895).
the
attributes Ignatieff and seriously
with . to
negative
to Beneath and sides
normal history
1983b, having “Karin For
-
whom to Man” book cause
there done
as
She and
the the hi
all of as
at a s , ,
43
Psychoanalytic Discourse Psychoanalytic Blum, References effect I omnipotence” tha he treatment about Anna psychoanalysis Without years, Gardiner spoke history. psychological Gardiner’s the of reconstruction of record about In come aff
will
ected a the t would question psychoanalysis,
letter is
a let
was the Freud’s her
to she validity
H of bout;
one
When . again.
the such
the
what
the now techn have father’s (1974). has quoted salutary,
efforts
complicated of Wolf the
of
Wolf
.
friendships never
well
1970
and and of
a Gardiner she
ical cure been can Association
But failures fiercely the
his
earlier,
contribu Man
- on his construc The published
Man’s advances being in
; be
lost letter
then cured how the ideas modern
any
behalf earliest truly
borderline have
are agrees, her
, loyal
truth.
Anna
Wolf one
effective and event. concludes, as analysis tions. in completely tion
,
meaningful”
much
faith
22
the of they the
in
contrast usually mother
such analytic
and
,
Freud
“It of psychoanalysis. the
“Neither
Man 721 final book
But
in Certainly,
also more
the
childhood
is
and it compassionate
faith, Wolf his -
742. - was rewarding it
“There
relationship does word. Wolf complains
to
about carried
supported with
was follow
ability delusions. obvious.”
Jung’s
(Stewart
have and as Man
not
not
Man’s
no Obholzer’s the many
About
of
was how -
to
I” up.
a know supported
a obsessional
to Wolf
and the
complete Somebody about keep ( the
,
heavy
Gardiner,
had a note friend infantile 1971 thorough of
As
his Wolf recent
Adler’s.
I
Wolf
in
us Man,
been the
the
have the from
analysis
).
book detail
are
she
burden.
his Man. healthy
living cure”
Man’s
discussion “disregard the neurosis
or analyzed
1983b,
or said already
the
has never
material complicated
The other
how permanent New
with
Wolf
(Obholzer Journal
record if been
place parts
Obholzer
the
the p
Freud residues believed York as
aware, . (in Freud,
— for 897). Man’s in
well
scientific Wolf
analytic of
in of
the how,
the of
historical
Times his
it psychoanalytic or , Freud’s -
presented
1980, being transference),
no the
was he
book
Man Society
letters left!
enriches mind through in
amount
said, American successes .
evidence reviewer
analytic p
were and opened
I
theory . i
truth” to
ntact. 138). think “The
here
Dr. the the his his
of in
44
Psychoanalytic Discourse Review Years Ignatieff, Psychoanalytic Gardiner, Austrian Gardiner, Most Gardiner, Washington, Papers, Gardiner, Sigmund Gardiner, Freud Gardiner, Freud Freud, Washington, Papers, Eissler,
Famous
Collection, Archives, Later A/Gardiner,
of K/Gardiner,
Underground Sigmund Sigmund
Freud
M M/Freud, M. Books M M/Pontalis, M. M , .
.
. D.C. D.C.
(1983
(Ed). by
Cas (1983 (n.d.).
(1983b). Asso
Collection,
, Manuscript
K.
by
Man e
.
, (1971). M
A.
a
Freud Freud New ciation Obholzer Februrary V. M ). .
Personal uscript (1980). (1980). . M
(1953). Brome].
New Code
. York:
(1980).
The The , Manuscript
Collection, Collection, Division, 31
Haven:
Division,
and
Letter Letter
Name
, 3
Wolf
Recollections Basic 867 Wolf ). Le London
tters the Last - Letter -
897.
Man of of
Yale
“Mary”: Books. Library
Man’s
book
Division,
Library 7/20/80. 3/29/80.
of Word Review Manuscript Manuscript
by University 3/23/53 of
the Ernest
4/16/80. of of
[ Last
Review of Memoirs
of
Wolf Box Congress, Box Library Anna
Congress,
Books
and
Years. Jones:
1, 1, - Press.
Man: Division, Division,
4/16/53. Muriel Muriel of Freud. Box
, of of
5
the
Washington,
(2),
Congress,
Freud’s an
The Washington, 5,
Journal
book
Gardiner Gardiner
23.
American
Muriel Box Double Box Library Library
The
Alter
3,
1, Washington,
of
Gardiner
Papers, Papers, Muriel D.C. Wolf Story Muriel
D.C. Woman the Ego. of of
-
Man:
of Congress, Congress,
American
Sigmund Sigmund Gardiner Gardiner
Freud’s London Papers,
in D.C.
Sixty
the
45
Psychoanalytic Discourse Society Association Webster, Sigmund Unterweger, Psychoanalytic To of Stewart, Roazen, 2 Attachment; Reeves, Freud Rangell, Controversial Obholzer, York: Isenberg, (3)
Freud’s m , linson,
343
Collection, Palgrave
and
R P RS L/Eissl
-
B. Freud
348. S . .
Most K (1975). .
(2008).
.
C
(1975, Institute Oral
. (2010). (1971 A/Gardiner, New
.
Patient (1980). (2018
Macmillan. Association er, Collection, F
Hist
Manuscript amous
Di
,
K December).
Freud May
Review ,
rections Archives, (1963).
ory . Muriel’s
February
New The
9
Case. Workshop, M
). and
Manuscript
.
Oral
Review York: of
(1971). Wolf
Letter Division, in
His ).
War: Boston, Interview The The
Psychotherapy History The -
Man Followers. Continuum.
New of
Analysand’s
of Oral An
Letter
Wolf 11/27/63.
The Massachusett Division, Library
Sixty American
York with Workshop History
Wolf Man: of
Times Muriel Years
New
10/22/71.
of
-
and
Box
Man Library Tale Past
Transcripts.
Congress, Heiress
.
, York:
Later: 6 Relational Gardiner.
1,
by and - by 7.
Muriel
the
of Robert Box
Da Present
in Congress,
Conversations Wolf Washington,
Capo The the 2,
Gardiner
American
Psychoanalysis Muriel - Morley
Man: Nazi Encounters. Boston
Press.
Washington,
Resistance
The
Gardiner Papers,
(Karnac,
D.C. Psychoanalytic Psychoanalytic
with Double
American
Sigmund Journal
Freud’s Papers,
. 2007).
D.C. Story New
,
46
Psychoanalytic Discourse