DOCSLIB.ORG

(MSC) Final Report SARPC Kerguelen and Crozet Toothfish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(MSC) Final Report SARPC Kerguelen and Crozet Toothfish Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Final Report SARPC Kerguelen and Crozet toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) fishery On behalf of SARPC Prepared by Control Union Pesca Ltd November 2018 Authors: Sophie des Clers Robin Cook Henry Ernst Control Union Pesca Ltd 56 High Street, Lymington Hampshire SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cupesca.com Contents CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................. 1 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 6 RÉSUMÉ EXÉCUTIF ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS ..................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Assessment Team ................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Peer Reviewers...................................................................................................................... 13 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY .............................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Units of Assessment (UoAs) and Scope of Certification ....................................................... 14 2.1.1 Final Units of Certification (UoCs) ................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data .................................................................................. 15 2.2 Overview of the fishery ......................................................................................................... 17 2.2.1 Fishing areas and seasons ............................................................................................................... 17 2.2.2 Vessels, fishing gear and operation of the fishery .......................................................................... 18 2.2.3 Other fisheries in Kerguelen and Crozet French EEZ and associated CCAMLR areas ..................... 20 2.3 Principle One: Target Species ............................................................................................... 22 2.3.1 Target species overview ................................................................................................................. 22 2.3.2 Information sources and data collection ........................................................................................ 22 2.3.3 Depredation .................................................................................................................................... 24 2.3.4 Stock assessment ............................................................................................................................ 25 2.3.5 Stock trends .................................................................................................................................... 27 2.3.6 Reference points ............................................................................................................................. 29 2.3.7 Harvest strategy .............................................................................................................................. 29 2.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem...................................................................................................... 31 2.4.1 Principle 2 definitions ..................................................................................................................... 31 2.4.2 Information on non-target species ................................................................................................. 32 2.4.3 Catch of non-target species ............................................................................................................ 33 2.4.4 Bait .................................................................................................................................................. 35 2.4.5 Designation of species under Principle 2 ........................................................................................ 36 2.4.6 Primary species ............................................................................................................................... 38 2.4.7 Secondary species ........................................................................................................................... 39 2.4.8 ETP species ...................................................................................................................................... 42 2.4.9 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................... 46 2.4.10 Ecosystem impacts.......................................................................................................................... 48 2.5 Principle Three: Management System .................................................................................. 50 2.5.1 Jurisdictions .................................................................................................................................... 52 2.5.2 Legal basis and management system ............................................................................................. 52 2.5.3 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................... 53 2.5.4 Management plans ......................................................................................................................... 55 2.5.5 Stakeholders and consultation processes ....................................................................................... 55 2.5.6 Disputes and resolution mechanisms ............................................................................................. 56 2.5.7 Fisheries surveillance and enforcement ......................................................................................... 57 2.5.8 Evaluation and review of the management system ....................................................................... 58 3191R06A Control Union Pesca Ltd 1 MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (8th October 2014) Pesca V1.2 (2nd October 2017) 3 EVALUATION PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................... 59 3.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment .......................................................................................... 59 3.2 Previous certification assessments ....................................................................................... 59 3.2.1 UoA1 - Kerguelen ............................................................................................................................ 59 3.2.2 UoA2 - Crozet .................................................................................................................................. 61 3.2.3 Previous scoring both UoAs ............................................................................................................ 64 3.3 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................................. 65 3.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques .................................................................................. 65 3.4.1 Site Visits ......................................................................................................................................... 65 3.4.2 Evaluation Techniques .................................................................................................................... 67 4 TRACEABILITY .................................................................................................................................... 69 4.1 Eligibility Date ....................................................................................................................... 69 4.2 Traceability within the Fishery .............................................................................................. 69 4.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ....................................................................... 72 5 EVALUATION RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ 73 5.1 Principle Level Scores ............................................................................................................ 73 5.2 Summary of PI Level Scores .................................................................................................. 73 5.3 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 74 5.4 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 75 5.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ............................................................. 75 6 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification Guide to the Deep-Sea Cartilaginous Fishes Of
    Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean FAO. 2015. Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean. FishFinder Programme, by Ebert, D.A. and Mostarda, E., Rome, Italy. Supervision: Merete Tandstad, Jessica Sanders (FAO, Rome) Technical editor: Edoardo Mostarda (FAO, Rome) Colour illustrations, cover and graphic design: Emanuela D’Antoni (FAO, Rome) This guide was prepared under the “FAO Deep–sea Fisheries Programme” thanks to a generous funding from the Government of Norway (Support to the implementation of the International Guidelines on the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries in the High Seas project) for the purpose of assisting states, institutions, the fishing industry and RFMO/As in the implementation of FAO International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in the High Seas. It was developed in close collaboration with the FishFinder Programme of the Marine and Inland Fisheries Branch, Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The present guide covers the deep–sea Southeastern Atlantic Ocean and that portion of Southwestern Indian Ocean from 18°42’E to 30°00’E (FAO Fishing Area 47). It includes a selection of cartilaginous fish species of major, moderate and minor importance to fisheries as well as those of doubtful or potential use to fisheries. It also covers those little known species that may be of research, educational, and ecological importance. In this region, the deep–sea chondrichthyan fauna is currently represented by 50 shark, 20 batoid and 8 chimaera species. This guide includes full species accounts for 37 shark, 9 batoid and 4 chimaera species selected as being the more difficult to identify and/or commonly caught.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean
    Census of Antarctic Marine Life SCAR-Marine Biodiversity Information Network BIOGEOGRAPHIC ATLAS OF THE SOUTHERN OCEAN CHAPTER 7. BIOGEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF FISH. Duhamel G., Hulley P.-A, Causse R., Koubbi P., Vacchi M., Pruvost P., Vigetta S., Irisson J.-O., Mormède S., Belchier M., Dettai A., Detrich H.W., Gutt J., Jones C.D., Kock K.-H., Lopez Abellan L.J., Van de Putte A.P., 2014. In: De Broyer C., Koubbi P., Griffiths H.J., Raymond B., Udekem d’Acoz C. d’, et al. (eds.). Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean. Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, Cambridge, pp. 328-362. EDITED BY: Claude DE BROYER & Philippe KOUBBI (chief editors) with Huw GRIFFITHS, Ben RAYMOND, Cédric d’UDEKEM d’ACOZ, Anton VAN DE PUTTE, Bruno DANIS, Bruno DAVID, Susie GRANT, Julian GUTT, Christoph HELD, Graham HOSIE, Falk HUETTMANN, Alexandra POST & Yan ROPERT-COUDERT SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH THE BIOGEOGRAPHIC ATLAS OF THE SOUTHERN OCEAN The “Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean” is a legacy of the International Polar Year 2007-2009 (www.ipy.org) and of the Census of Marine Life 2000-2010 (www.coml.org), contributed by the Census of Antarctic Marine Life (www.caml.aq) and the SCAR Marine Biodiversity Information Network (www.scarmarbin.be; www.biodiversity.aq). The “Biogeographic Atlas” is a contribution to the SCAR programmes Ant-ECO (State of the Antarctic Ecosystem) and AnT-ERA (Antarctic Thresholds- Ecosys- tem Resilience and Adaptation) (www.scar.org/science-themes/ecosystems). Edited by: Claude De Broyer (Royal Belgian Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Workshop on Deep-Sea Species Identification, Rome, 2–4 December 2009
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) ISSN 2070-6987 Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 Cover photo: An aggregation of the hexactinellid sponge Poliopogon amadou at the Great Meteor seamount, Northeast Atlantic. Courtesy of the Task Group for Maritime Affairs, Estrutura de Missão para os Assuntos do Mar – Portugal. Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this Information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Sc-Camlr-38 Scientific Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine
    SC-CAMLR-38 SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE FOR THE CONSERVATION OF ANTARCTIC MARINE LIVING RESOURCES REPORT OF THE THIRTY-EIGHTH MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE HOBART, AUSTRALIA 21–25 OCTOBER 2019 CCAMLR PO Box 213 North Hobart 7002 Tasmania Australia _______________________ Telephone: 61 3 6210 1111 Facsimile: 61 3 6224 8766 Email: [email protected] Chair of the Scientific Committee Website: www.ccamlr.org November 2019 ________________________________________________________________________________________ This document is produced in the official languages of the Commission: English, French, Russian and Spanish. Copies are available from the CCAMLR Secretariat at the above address. Abstract This document presents the adopted report of the Thirty-eighth Meeting of the Scientific Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources held in Hobart, Australia, from 21 to 25 October 2019. Reports of meetings and intersessional activities of subsidiary bodies of the Scientific Committee, including the Working Groups on Statistics, Assessments and Modelling; Ecosystem Monitoring and Management; Fish Stock Assessment; and the Subgroup on Acoustic Survey and Analysis Methods, are appended. 1031-2889 Contents Page Opening of the meeting ...................................................................... 1 Adoption of the agenda .................................................................... 2 Chair’s report ............................................................................... 2 Advances in statistics, assessments,
    [Show full text]
  • Public Comment Draft Report SARPC Kerguelen and Crozet
    Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Public Comment Draft Report SARPC Kerguelen and Crozet toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) fishery On behalf of SARPC Prepared by Control Union Pesca Ltd October 2018 Authors: Sophie des Clers Robin Cook Henry Ernst Control Union Pesca Ltd 56 High Street, Lymington Hampshire SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cupesca.com Contents CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................. 1 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 6 RESUME EXECUTIF ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS ..................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Assessment Team ................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Peer Reviewers...................................................................................................................... 13 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    RAJIFORMES (Skates) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 23.0 - 27 June 2021 Order RAJIFORMES Skates 4 families · 38 genera/subgenera · 303 species/subspecies Family ARHYNCHOBATIDAE Softnose Skates 14 genera/subgenera · 110 species Arhynchobatis Waite 1909 a-, without; rhynchos, snout, referring to “absence of a cartilaginous rostral”; batis, Greek for a flat fish, usually applied to a skate or ray Arhynchobatis asperrimus Waite 1909 rough, referring to skin on dorsal surface “everywhere covered with closely set spines” Atlantoraja Menni 1972 Atlanto, referring to distribution of A. castelnaui and A. cyclophora in southwestern Atlantic Ocean; raia, Latin for ray or skate Atlantoraja castelnaui (Miranda Ribeiro 1907) in honor of Francis de Laporte de Castelnau (1810-1880), French naturalist who studied the fishes of Brazil Atlantoraja cyclophora (Regan 1903) cyclo, circle; phora, to bear, referring to ocellus formed by two concentric black circles on each pectoral fin Atlantoraja platana (Günther 1880) -ana, belonging to: referring to mouth of the Río de la Plata (between Uruguay and Argentina), type locality Bathyraja Ishiyama 1958 bathy, deep, referring to deepwater habitat of B. trachouros; raia, Latin for ray or skate Subgenus Bathyraja Bathyraja abyssicola (Gilbert 1896) abyss, deep sea; -cola, dweller or inhabitant, referring to deepwater habitat (type collected at 1588 fathoms) Bathyraja aguja (Kendall & Radcliffe 1912) referring to Point Aguja, Peru, type locality Bathyraja albomaculata
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranchii, Batomorphii) from the Eocene La Meseta and Submeseta Formations, Seymour Island, Antarctica
    Historical Biology An International Journal of Paleobiology ISSN: 0891-2963 (Print) 1029-2381 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20 Skates and rays (Elasmobranchii, Batomorphii) from the Eocene La Meseta and Submeseta formations, Seymour Island, Antarctica Andrea Engelbrecht, Thomas Mörs, Marcelo A. Reguero & Jürgen Kriwet To cite this article: Andrea Engelbrecht, Thomas Mörs, Marcelo A. Reguero & Jürgen Kriwet (2018): Skates and rays (Elasmobranchii, Batomorphii) from the Eocene La Meseta and Submeseta formations, Seymour Island, Antarctica, Historical Biology, DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2017.1417403 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1417403 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 04 Jan 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ghbi20 Download by: [Naturhistoriska Riksmuseum] Date: 05 January 2018, At: 05:16 HISTORICAL BIOLOGY, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2017.1417403 OPEN ACCESS Skates and rays (Elasmobranchii, Batomorphii) from the Eocene La Meseta and Submeseta formations, Seymour Island, Antarctica Andrea Engelbrechta , Thomas Mörsb , Marcelo A. Regueroc and Jürgen Kriweta aDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; bDepartment of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden; cDivision Paleontologia de Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Eocene deposits of the famous La Meseta Formation of Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula, yielded the Received 17 October 2017 most diverse Paleogene fossil elasmobranch association of the Southern Hemisphere. In this assemblage, Accepted 11 December 2017 sharks clearly dominate the fauna, whereas batoids are very rare components.
    [Show full text]
  • Shark Biodiversity Management Plan
    Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA March Vol. 597 Pretoria, 25 2015 Maart No. 38607 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 501084—A 38607—1 2 No. 38607 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 25 MARCH 2015 I nitheittaruniev eGazette from Government Printing Works DON'TS DO use the new Adobe Forms for your notice request. DON'T submit request as a single PDF containing all These new forms can be found on our website: other documents, i.e. form, proof of payment & notice under the Gazette Services page. content, it will be FAILED by our new system. DO attach documents separately in your email to GPW. DON'T print and scan the electronic Adobe form. (In other words, your email should have an Adobe Form plus proof of payment -2 separate attachments - where DON'T send queries or RFQ's to the submit.egazette notice content is applicable, it should also be a 3rd mailbox. separate attachment) DON'T send bad quality documents to GPW. (Check DO specify your requested publication date. that documents are clear and can be read) LET US DO send us the electronic Adobe form. (There is no need to print and scan it). OW- Help You... Completed Z95 Form I Completed Tender Form 195- PROV TFORM 3 OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR PROVVICIAL PtIOUCAllON *MU OMIT* OFF SALE KENNISGEWING V* PROVINSIALE Fin I FOR SMUTTING INSULTS CO TPCHINVITATIONS FOR PIMUCATIOII THE LOYERIMBO TINDERSULLITPI le Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali)
    www.shark-references.com Version 14.10.2011 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Species descriptions published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 - 1 - please inform me about missing papers E-Mail: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 14.10.2011 Abstract: This collection is the result of research in numerous journals, books and online publications. It contains the citations of papers about the first description of sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) until 2011. Notice: This paper is intended to be consulted for advice and information. This information has been compiled to the best of my abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however, please note that possible errors cannot be altogether/entirely excluded. Citation: Pollerspöck, J. (2011), Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) - Species descriptions -, www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 10/2011; ISSN: 2195-6499 © Edited By: Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, D-94569 Stephansposching; Germany Please support www.shark-references.com Please send me missing, not listed references! Send me publications that are not incorporated so far (marked in red lettering)! - 2 - please inform me about missing papers E-Mail: [email protected] www.shark-references.com
    [Show full text]
  • Host - Parasites List
    www.shark-references.com Version 01.08.2012 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Host - Parasites List published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 Huffmanela lata Justine, 2005 © Prof. Jean-Lou Justine, Paris Protocotyle euzetmaillardi Justine, 2011 © Prof. Jean-Lou Justine, Paris 1 please send missing paper to: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 01.08.2012 Please support www.shark-references.com Please send me missing, not listed references! Inform me about missing parasites records! Abstract: This is the first version of an “Host - Parasites List” of cartilaginous fishes (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali). This first edition records more than 1.500 different species of parasites recovered from more than 400 species of sharks, rays, skates and chimaeras. All information about the parasites are also available at http://shark-references.com/index.php/species/listValidRecent/A (weekly update). Notice: This paper is intended to be consulted for advice and information. This information has been compiled to the best of my abilities based on current knowledge and practice.Please note, however, that possible errors cannot be altogether/entirely excluded. Citation: Pollerspöck, J. (2012), Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichtyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) – Host - Parasites List -, www.shark-references.com, World Wide Web electronic publication, Version 08/2012 ISSN: 2195-6499 © Edited By: Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, D-94569 Stephansposching; Germany Acknowledgements: I am thankful to Prof. Jean-Lou Justine, Paris for the permission to use the images of the front cover and for his support.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Introduction
    2020 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 28(5) ANTARCTICA AND SURROUNDING ISLANDS: UPDATED CATCH RECONSTRUCTIONS FOR 2011-2018* Darcy Dunstana, Courtney Browna Simon-Luc Noëla, Veronica Relanoa, Rachel Whiteb and Dirk Zellerb a) Sea Around Us, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada b) Sea Around Us- Indian Ocean, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley 6009, WA, Australia Abstract This contribution presents updated catch reconstructions for 2011-2018 for Antarctica’s Large Marine Ecosystem and the Exclusive Economic Zones of Bouvet Island (Norway), Crozet Island (France), Falkland Islands (U.K.), South Georgia, South Sandwich, and South Orkney Islands (U.K.), Kerguelen Islands (France), St. Paul and Amsterdam Islands (France) and Prince Edward Island (South Africa). The major difficulties in updating the catch reconstructions for these countries were the remote nature of these areas and the data peculiarity of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) of reporting by fishing season (i.e., December of one year to November the next year) rather than standardized to calendar year. These difficulties were overcome by converting catches reported for the fishing season to calendar year, and applying literature estimates to estimate IUU fishing of commercially valuable species. Specific details on how each reconstruction was updated and carried forward are presented by island or island group. Introduction This contribution presents the basic methods used and assumptions made to update to 2018 the catch reconstructions initially covering the year 1950 to 2010 performed by the Sea Around Us and its international network of collaborators.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissostichus Eleginoides) Fishery
    Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) 1st Surveillance Audit Report SARPC Kerguelen and Crozet toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) fishery On behalf of SARPC Prepared by Control Union Pesca Ltd February 2020 Authors: Sophie des Clers Mathias Deleau Control Union Pesca Ltd. 56 High Street, Lymington, Hampshire, SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cupesca.com CONTENTS QA ............................................................................................................................................... 2 GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 5 2 REPORT DETAILS ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Surveillance information ......................................................................................................... 6 3 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Version details ......................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Units of Assessment (UoA) ..................................................................................................... 8 3.3
    [Show full text]