DOCSLIB.ORG

Eno River Watershed Assessment Report (See Including the City’S Goals and Vision on Volume III, Appendix E, of This WIP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eno River Watershed Assessment Report (See Including the City’S Goals and Vision on Volume III, Appendix E, of This WIP) Volume II Eno River Watershed Improvement Plan Improvement Plan Durham, North Carolina December 2018 PREPARED FOR: City of Durham Public Works Department Stormwater & GIS Services Division 101 City Hall Plaza, Third Floor Durham, North Carolina 27701 This page left blank intentionally Eno River Watershed Improvement Plan City of Durham Stormwater & GIS Services Division Public Works Department 101 City Hall Plaza, Third Floor Durham, North Carolina 27701 This page left blank intentionally AECOM Acknowledgments The Eno River Watershed Improvement Plan represents the combined effort of staff from the City of Durham, AECOM, Kimley Horn and Associates, and Three Oaks Engineering. City of Durham Team Paul Wiebke, Assistant Director, Public Works Kelly Hartman Sandra Wilbur, Project Manager Dana Hornkohl Lance Fontaine, Assistant Project Manager J.V. Loperfido Jonathan Baker Don O’Toole Christine Cailleret Laura Smith Charlotte Dawn Megan Walsh Erin Harrison Michelle Woolfolk AECOM Team AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina Sujit Ekka, Project Manager Michelle Mayfield Brian Jacobson, Deputy Project Manager Karthik Narayanaswamy Matthew Burnette Alex Nice Diana Burke Hernan Rodriguez Brad Courtney Jason Sites Manasa Damera Zack Twigg Beth Kerby Cyndy Yu-Robinson Kimley-Horn and Associates Three Oaks Engineering Beth Reed Tom Dickinson Jason Hartshorn Nathan Howell Andrew Jones Kate Monteith Sevick Jennifer Murphy Chris Sheats This page left blank intentionally AECOM Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Goals ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.3 Organization ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1-3 2 Watershed Assessment ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Watershed Characteristics ....................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Data Inventory ............................................................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Summary of Previous Studies................................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.1.3 Hydrology...................................................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.4 Topography .................................................................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.1.5 Geology and Soils ...................................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.6 Floodplains ................................................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.1.7 Land Use and Impervious Cover .......................................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2 Water Quality Conditions ........................................................................................................................................................ 2-8 2.2.1 Surface Water Classifications................................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.2.2 Water Quality Monitoring....................................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.2.3 Sediment Monitoring .............................................................................................................................................2-12 2.3 Watershed Impacts and Sources of Pollution ...............................................................................................................2-13 3 Stream Inventory and Assessment and Project Opportunities .................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Stream Field Inventory and Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Results of Stream Field Assessments .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Potential Stream Project Opportunities ............................................................................................................................. 3-3 4 Stormwater Control Measure Inventory, Assessment, and Project Opportunities ................................... 4-1 4.1 SCM Field Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Retrofit Opportunities to Existing SCMs ............................................................................................................................ 4-2 4.3 Potential New SCMs .................................................................................................................................................................. 4-4 5 Evaluation of Watershed Improvement Scenarios ......................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Pilot Study Areas ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Stormwater Management Modeling................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Scenarios ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.3.1 Scenario Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 5-2 5.3.2 Scenario Results ........................................................................................................................................................5-10 6 Prioritization of Watershed Improvement Projects....................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Prioritization Criteria .................................................................................................................................................................. 6-1 Eno River Watershed Improvement Plan, Volume II i AECOM 6.2 High-Priority Watershed Improvement Projects ............................................................................................................ 6-3 6.2.1 High-Priority SCM Projects..................................................................................................................................... 6-3 6.2.2 High Priority Stream Improvement Projects ................................................................................................... 6-4 7 Public Outreach and Involvement .................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Public Information Sessions ................................................................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 First Public Information Session: March 21, 2017 ......................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 Second Public Information Session: November 2, 2017............................................................................. 7-1 7.1.3 Third Public Information Session: July 31, 2018............................................................................................. 7-2 7.2 Eno Watershed River Improvement Plan Webpage...................................................................................................... 7-3 7.3 Eno River Watershed Improvement Plan Social Media Updates ............................................................................. 7-3 7.4 Project Fact Sheets ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7-3 7.5 Educational Radio Spots .......................................................................................................................................................... 7-3 7.6 Educational
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 Falls Lake Status Report
    A-1 2021 Status Report Falls Lake Nutrient Strategy View of Falls Lake from Forest Ridge Park in Raleigh For July 8, 2021 Meeting of the N.C. Environmental Management Commission Developed by the N.C. Division of Water Resources Nonpoint Source Planning Branch 1 A-2 The Nonpoint Source Planning staff gratefully acknowledges the input and recommendations offered by the following individuals and organizations during various stages of this report: Adugna Kebede, N.C. Division of Water Resources Alix Matos, Brown & Caldwell Andy McDaniel, NC Department of Transportation Andy Painter, N.C. Division of Water Resources Annette Lucas, N.C. Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Charles Weaver, N.C. Division of Water Resources Cody Norwood, South Granville Sewer and Water Authority Craig Caldwell, N.C. Division of Water Resources Forrest Westall, Upper Neuse River Basin Association Haywood Phthisic, Neuse River Compliance Association Jeanette Powell, N.C. Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Jeff Mahagan, Hillsborough Wastewater Treatment Plant Jim Hawhee, N.C. Division of Water Resources Joey Hester, N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services John Dodson, North Durham Water Reclamation Facility Katie Merritt, N.C. Division of Water Resources Kelly Williams, N.C. Division of Mitigation Services Kristen Slodysko, N.C. Division of Water Resources Local governments of the Upper Neuse River Basin Association Mike Templeton, N.C. Division of Water Resources Nathaniel Thornburg, N.C. Division of Water Resources Niki Maher, N.C. Division of Water Resources Pam Behm, N.C. Division of Water Resources Reginald Hicks, Durham Department of Water Management Sandra Wilbur, City of Durham Public Works Department Scott Schroyer, South Granville Sewer and Water Authority Steve Wall, UNC Institute of the Environment Sushama Pradhan, N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Existing Conditions
    Updated, April 2012 Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A Existing Conditions Part 1 Demographics and Economics Durham City-County Planning Department Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A, Existing Conditions, Part 1 The Durham Comprehensive Plan Contents Chapter 1. Introduction and Administration Element Chapter 2. Land Use Element Chapter 3. Housing Element Chapter 4. Community Character and Design Element Chapter 5. Historic Preservation Element Chapter 6. Economic Development Element Chapter 7. Conservation and Environment Element Chapter 8. Transportation Element Chapter 9. Water Utilities Element Chapter 10. Parks and Recreation Element Chapter 11. Schools Element Chapter 12. Public Safety Element Chapter 13. Solid Waste Element Chapter 14. Libraries Element Chapter 15. Capital Improvements Element Chapter 16. Intergovernmental Cooperation Element Appendices Durham Comprehensive Plan Appendix A, Existing Conditions, Part 1 Appendix A, Existing Conditions Part 1: Demographics & Economics Chapter Contents Part 1: Demographics and the Economy ..................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 Regional Context .................................................................................. 1 Population .......................................................................................... 8 Economy .......................................................................................... 20 Tables Table 1. Population by Race/Ethnicity .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Living Water. Eno River State Park: an Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for the Middle Grades. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 376 024 SE 054 365 AUTHOR Hartley, Scott; Woods, Martha TITLE Living Water. Eno River State Park: An Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for the Middle Grades. INSTITUTION North Carolina State Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Raleigh. Div. of Parks and Recreation. PUB DATE Oct 92 NOTE 96p.; For other Environmental Education Learning Experiences, see SE 054 364-371. AVAILABLE ,FROM North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611-7687. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher)(052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Classification; Computation; Ecology; Entomology; Environmental Education; Experiential Learning; Field Trips; Grade 5; Grade 6; Integrated Activities; Intermediate Grades; Maps; *Marine Biology; Natural Resources; *Outdoor Activities; *Outdoor Education; Teaching Guides; Water Pollution; *Water Quality; *Water Resources IDENTIFIERS Dichotomous Keys; Environmental. Management; *North Carolina; pH; Rivers; State Parks; Water Quality Analysis; Watersheds ABSTRACT This learning packet, one in a series of eight, was developed by the Eno River State Park in North Carolina for Grades 5-6 to teach about various aspects of water life on the Eno River. Loose -leaf pages are presented in nine sections that contain: (1) introductions to the North Carolina State Park System, the Eno River State Park, and to the park's activity packet;(2) a summary of the activities that includes major concepts and objectives covered; (3) pre-visit activities on map trivia and dichotomous classification keys;(4) on-site activities on river flow, pH values, water bugs and river sediment;(5) post-visit activities on water pollution; (6)a list ol7 69 related vocabulary words; (7) park and parental permission forms for the visit; and (8) blank pages for taking notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Eno River State Park Aquatic Inventory
    ENO RIVER STATE PARK AQUATIC INVENTORY by Gabriela B. Mottesi and Mara E. Savacool edited by John M. Alderman Cooperating Agencies: Division of Parks and Recreation, NC Natural Heritage Program NC Wildlife Resources Commission US Fish and Wildlife Service Funded by NC Natural Heritage Trust Fund NC Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Fund National Fish and Wildlife Foundation NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION JULY 1, 1996 145 9/2:A68e ENO RIVER STATE PARK AQUATIC INVENTORY Few's Ford tote Liters* of North Gamins' Raleigh MS tf/L £, 9 Table of Contents Page Introduction and Acknowledgments 1 Aquatic Snails 3 Freshwater Mussels and Sphaeriid Clams 10 Crayfish 1 Freshwater Fish 27 Point Sources and Animal Facilities 35 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from State Library of North Carolina https://archive.org/details/enoriverstatepar1996mott Eno River State Park Aquatic Inventory Introduction Eno River State Park is located in Durham and Orange counties and encompasses 1,568 acres. The main attractions of this state park are the Eno River and its bordering woodlands. The park is divided into the following 5 areas through which the river can be accessed: the Cabe Lands, Cole Mill, Few’s Ford, Pleasant Green, and the Pump Station. Lands were initially purchased in 1975 by the State after concerned citizens led a campaign to prevent reservoir construction on the lower Eno River. Before the lands were purchased, they were used largely for agriculture. At that time, more than 30 mills were located on the Eno River. The Eno River, along with the Little and Flat Rivers, form the headwaters of the Neuse River, which is essentially our modern-day Falls Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Falls Lake State Recreation Area General Management Plan
    Falls Lake State Recreation Area General Management Plan North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Division of Parks and Recreation Piedmont Region November 2017 I. MISSION AND PURPOSE MISSION STATEMENT: The North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation exists to inspire all its citizens and visitors through conservation, recreation and education. Conservation: To conserve and protect representative examples of North Carolina’s natural beauty, ecological features, recreational and cultural resources within the state parks system; Recreation: To provide and promote safe, healthy and enjoyable outdoor recreational opportunities throughout the state; and Education: To provide educational opportunities that promote stewardship of the state’s natural and cultural heritage. Our purpose: The State of North Carolina offers unique archaeologic, geologic, biologic scenic and recreational resources. These resources are part of the heritage of the people of this State. The heritage of a people should be preserved and managed by those people for their use and for the use of their visitors and descendants. PARK PURPOSE: Falls Lake is an important statewide recreational and scenic values for its biological significance. The significant values include archeological and geological resources. Eight major recreational areas comprise Falls Lake State Recreation Area (SRA). They permit public access to the lake and provide a variety of recreational activities compatible with natural resources, including: Shoreline swimming, boating, fishing, picnicking, trail use, and natural and cultural resource interpretation. Overnight recreational opportunities are offered at tent-and-trailer campgrounds and group campgrounds. Falls Lake State Recreation Area provides outstanding scenic vistas of open water and the predominantly natural lake shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • Eno River State Park EELE
    Eno River State Park An Environmental Education Learning Experience Designed for the Middle Grades ―Without life, there would still be water. Without water no life.” David Quammen, Natural Acts, A Sidelong View of Science and Nature This Environmental Education Learning Experience was developed by Scott Hartley and Martha Woods, former Park Rangers at Eno River State Park. Revised May 2013 by Brian Bockhahn, Jack Singley and Nathan Swick. North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation Department of Environment and Natural Resources Other Contributors . Park volunteers; Association for the Preservation of the Eno River Valley, Inc.; Riffle and Pool Naturalists; The N.C. Department of Public Instruction; The N.C. Division of Water Resources; The N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources; and the many individuals and agencies who assisted in the review of this publication. 1. Introduction Introduction to the North Carolina State Parks System Introduction to Eno River State Park Introduction to the Activity Packet for Eno River State Park 2. Activity Summary Correlation Chart 2 3. Pre-Visit Activities # 1 Map Trivia # 2 The Key to Water Quality 4. On-Site Activities # 1 Go With The Flow # 2 Mind Your p’s and H’s # 3 Sediment: The “S” Word # 4 Water Bugs 5. Post-Visit Activities # 1 Fragile Waters # 2 Growing Water Bugs 1. Vocabulary 2. References 3. Forms Notes That was in 1915. The North Carolina State Parks System has now been established for nearly a century. What started out as one small plot of public land has grown into 67 properties across the state, Preserving and including parks, recreation areas, trails, rivers, lakes and natural protecting North Carolina’s natural resources is areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Nutrient Reduction Sourcebook
    Piedmont Nutrient Reduction Sourcebook Piedmont Nutrient Reduction Sourcebook Strategies for Reducing and Managing Nutrients 2011 to Waters of the North Carolina Piedmont Piedmont Triad and Triangle J Council of Governments Piedmont Nutrient Reduction Sourcebook This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double‐sided printing. Piedmont Nutrient Reduction Sourcebook Piedmont Nutrient Reduction Sourcebook Strategies for Reducing and Managing Nutrients to Waters of the North Carolina Piedmont EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Piedmont Nutrient Reduction Sourcebook is a resource tool developed through partnership between the Piedmont Triad and Triangle J Councils of Governments (PTCOG & TJCOG, respectively). This book was created with the support of a federal 205(j) grant distributed by the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ), and aims to provide a set of strategies for reducing and managing nutrients to waters of the North Carolina Piedmont. In recent years, managing nutrients for water quality and maintaining designated uses for waterbodies has become a critical issue both throughout the country, and in North Carolina. In the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) 2000 National Water Quality Inventory, 39 percent of assessed river and stream miles, 46 percent of assessed lake acres, and 51 percent of assessed estuarine square miles did not meet water quality standards in the US. As such, the USEPA has been giving greater attention to non-point source pollution, and in North Carolina, knowledge and technology for addressing all forms of non-point source pollution are being applied due to a combination of greater environmental awareness and federal and state regulations. The following Sourcebook aims to summarize the tools and regulations that exist in North Carolina to address non- point source nutrient pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Booklet
    ! Vol. X OCTOBER, 1910 No. 2 'Ghe floRTH CflROIilNfl BoOKliET '^Carolina! Carolina! Heave^i' s blessings attend her While we live tve will cherish^ protect a7id defend her^ Published by THE NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE REVOLUTION The object of the Booklet is to aid in developing and preserving North Carolina History. The proceeds arising from its publication will be de- voted to patriotic purposes. Editor. : : ADVISORY BOARD OF THE NORTH CAROLINA BOOKLET. Mrs. Hubert Haywood. Miss Martha Helen Haywood. Mr. E. E. Moffitt. Dr. Richard Dillard. Mrs. Spier Whitakee. Dr. Kemp P. Battle. Mr. R. D. W. Connor. Mr. James Sprunt. Dr. D. H. Hill. Mb. Marshall DeLancey Haywood. Dr. E. W. Sikes. Chief Justice Walter Clark. Mb, W. J. Peele. Major W. A. Graham. editor: Miss Mary Hilliard Hinton. OFFICERS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SOCIETY DAUGHTERS OF THE REVOLUTION 1910-1912. regent: Miss Mx\RY HILLIARD HINTON. vice-regent : Miss CATHERINE FAUNTLEROY SEYTON ALBERTSON. honorary REGENTS: Mrs. SPIER WHITAKER. Mrs. E. E. MOFFITT. RECORDING SECRETARY: Mrs. J. LEIGH SKINNER. CORRESPONDING SECRETARY Mrs. PAUL H. LEE. TREASURER: Mrs. frank SHERWOOD. REGISTRAR Mrs. JOSEPH CHESHIRE WEBB. GENEALOGIST AND HISTORIAN: Mrs. HELEN DeBERNIERE WILLS. CUSTODIAN OF RELICS: Mrs. JOHN E. RAY. CHAPTER REGENTS. Bloomsbury Chapter Mrs. Hubert Haywood, Regent. Penelope Barker Chapter ]Mrs. Patrick Matthew, Regent. Sir Walter Raleigh Chapter Mrs. Walker Waller Joynes, Regent. DeGraffenried Chapter Mrs. Charles Slover Hollister, Regent. Founder of the North Carolina Society and Regent 1896-1902; Mrs. spier WHITAKER. Regent 1902: Mrs. D. H. HILL, Sr.* Regent 1902-1906: Mrs. THOMAS K. BRUNER. Regent 1906-1910: Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Resources and Water Safety
    CHAPTER 10 - WILDLIFE RESOURCES AND WATER SAFETY This Chapter 10 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15A NCAC 10); WILDLIFE RESOURCES AND WATER SAFETY; has been transferred and recodified from Chapter 10 of Title 15 of the North Carolina Administrative Code (15 NCAC 10), effective November 1, 1989. The recodification was pursuant to G.S. 143B-279.1. SUBCHAPTER 10A - WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION SECTION .0100 - GENERAL 15A NCAC 10A .0101 RESPONSIBILITIES 15A NCAC 10A .0102 FUNCTIONS 15A NCAC 10A .0103 FISCAL POLICY 15A NCAC 10A .0104 REIMBURSEMENT OF WILDLIFE FUND 15A NCAC 10A .0105 STEWARDSHIP OF REVENUES 15A NCAC 10A .0106 MOTTO History Note: Authority G.S. 75A-3; 113-306; 113-307.1; 143-239; 143-243; 143-250; 143-254.1; 143A-118; 143B-281; Eff. February 1, 1976; Repealed Eff. February 1, 1982. SECTION .0200 - ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURE 15A NCAC 10A .0201 ACTION BY COMMISSION History Note: Authority G.S. 143-243; Eff. February 1, 1976; Repealed Eff. July 1, 1988. 15A NCAC 10A .0202 OFFICERS OF COMMISSION 15A NCAC 10A .0203 MEETINGS OF COMMISSION History Note: Authority G.S. 143-243; Eff. February 1, 1976; Amended Eff. April 15, 1979; Repealed Eff. February 1, 1982. 15A NCAC 10A .0204 COMMITTEES History Note: Authority G.S. 75A-3(b); 143-243; Eff. February 1, 1976; Amended Eff. April 15, 1979; Repealed Eff. July 1, 1988. 15A NCAC 10A .0205 SEAL OF COMMISSION 15A NCAC 10A .0206 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 15A NCAC 10A .0207 ASSISTANT FOR ADMINISTRATION 15A NCAC 10A .0208 ASSISTANT FOR FIELD OPERATIONS History Note: Authority G.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Stormwater Management in Ellerbe Creek Watershed: the Duke Diet & Fitness Center Case Study
    Urban Stormwater Management in Ellerbe Creek Watershed: The Duke Diet & Fitness Center Case Study Report Prepared By: Jessie Allen & Nancy Scott Dr. Kenneth Reckhow, Advisor May, 2011 Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Environmental Management Degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University 2011 ABSTRACT: Stormwater runoff from urban land has become a challenge for growing communities in managing non-point source pollution. The stormwater runoff of Downtown Durham, North Carolina is of particular interest, due to its location relative to the Falls Lake Reservoir. The purpose of this study is to use monitoring and modeling data to determine the best management of the Duke Diet and Fitness Center property, which drains 474 acres of urban land in Downtown Durham. Monitoring data was collected at this site for 9 storm events from July to October, 2010 and then analyzed for total nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. The Jordan/Falls Lake Stormwater Accounting Tool and the Upper Neuse Site Evaluation Tool were used to determine nutrient loads and peak flow rate for 4 management scenarios using Best Management Practices (BMPs) in the drainage catchments. Based on these results, we give our recommendation for the construction of a wet pond at the site which will significantly reduce peak flow and nutrient loads from Downtown Durham. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative Conservation Plan
    THE UPPER NEUSE CLEAN WATER INITIATIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Protecting Land and Drinking Water for the Future C ITY OF R ALEIGH C ONSERVATION T RUST FOR N ORTH C AROLINA E LLERBE C REEK W ATERSHED A SSOCIATION E NO R IVER A SSOCIATION N EUSE R IVER F OUNDATION TAR R IVER L AND C ONSERVANCY T RIANGLE G REENWAYS C OUNCIL T RIANGLE J COUNCIL OF G OVERNMENTS T RIANGLE L AND C ONSERVANCY T HE T RUST FOR P UBLIC L AND U PPER N EUSE R IVER B ASIN A SSOCIATION Written by Kelley Hart, The Trust for Public Land Designed and produced by Patrice Gallagher, Gallagher/Wood Design Copyright 2006 by the Trust for Public Land All rights reserved cover photo left The Conservation Trust for North Carolina cover photo center The Trust for Public Land (archives) cover photo right Upper Neuse River Basin Association THE UPPER NEUSE CLEAN WATER INITIATIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Protecting Land and Drinking Water for the Future This conservation plan and other efforts of the Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative were generously funded by the CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA. Table of Contents I NTRODUCTION 1 T HE U PPER N EUSE R IVER B ASIN TODAY AND TOMORROW 3 S TRESSES ON DRINKING WATER S UPPLIES 4 T HE R EGULATORY FABRIC 7 L AND C ONSERVATION AS A DRINKING WATER P ROTECTION S TRATEGY 9 Conservation Accomplishments and Efforts Underway 9 Advancing Land Conservation for Source Protection 10 Process 10 Results 12 G ETTING TO I MPLEMENTATION 14 Potential Sources of Local Funding 14 Potential Sources of State and Federal Funding 16 C ONCLUSION 17 A PPENDICES Appendix A: Current
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    November 2016 NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail through Orange County Frequently Asked Questions What is the NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail? The NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail (MST) is a 1,000-mile trail that will traverse the state from the Great Smoky Mountains in western North Carolina to Jockey’s Ridge State Park on the Outer Banks. Partners across the state are helping to plan and build the trail that will link communities and serve as the backbone of a growing system of land and water trails in North Carolina. In 2000 the NC General Assembly authorized the MST as a unit of the North Carolina Parks System. A map showing the Mountains-to-Sea State Trail across North Carolina is available at: http://www.orangecountync.gov/MST_statewide_map__0612_Status_.pdf How many miles of the NC Mountains-to-Sea Trail are finished? Over 600 miles of dedicated trail — well over half the planned length— has been completed to date and is open for hiking. A series of interim roadway connectors (bicycle routes and back roads) have been identified by the Friends of the Mountains-to-Sea Trail organization that knit together the completed sections of the MST across the state. Some examples of completed trail in this area include the following: • In Durham and Wake counties there are 77 miles of the trail along the Eno River and Falls Lake • Raleigh and Clayton completed a 33-mile Neuse River Greenway from Falls Lake Dam to Clayton • Alamance County has 15 miles of trail – including 8 miles from Glencoe to Town of Haw River • Hillsborough completed the 1.3-mile Riverwalk and Classical American Homes Preservation Trust extended the trail another 1.5 miles.
    [Show full text]