Competent District Court in Summary Civil Cases by Municipality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Competent District Court in Summary Civil Cases by Municipality Competent district court in summary civil cases by municipality In undisputed civil cases to be considered in the summary procedure (so-called summary civil cases), the competent district court is determined on the basis of the defendant’s municipality of residence. The left column lists all Finnish municipalities in alphabetical order, and the right column shows the district court that is competent to consider summary civil cases in the municipality. Municipality Competent district court for considering summary civil cases Akaa Pirkanmaa District Court Alajärvi Ostrobothnia District Court Alavieska Oulu District Court Alavus Ostrobothnia District Court Asikkala Kymenlaakso District Court Askola Eastern Uusimaa District Court Aura Southwest Finland District Court Brändö Åland District Court Eckerö Åland District Court Enonkoski Kymenlaakso District Court Enontekiö Lapland District Court Espoo Eastern Uusimaa District Court Eura Pirkanmaa District Court Eurajoki Pirkanmaa District Court Evijärvi Ostrobothnia District Court Finström Åland District Court Forssa Southwest Finland District Court Föglö Åland District Court Geta Åland District Court Haapajärvi Oulu District Court Haapavesi Oulu District Court Hailuoto Oulu District Court Halsua Ostrobothnia District Court Hamina Kymenlaakso District Court Hammarland Åland District Court Hankasalmi Ostrobothnia District Court Hanko Eastern Uusimaa District Court Harjavalta Pirkanmaa District Court Hartola Kymenlaakso District Court Hattula Southwest Finland District Court Hausjärvi Southwest Finland District Court Heinola Kymenlaakso District Court Heinävesi Kymenlaakso District Court Municipality Competent district court for considering summary civil cases Helsinki Helsinki District Court Hirvensalmi Kymenlaakso District Court Hollola Kymenlaakso District Court Honkajoki Pirkanmaa District Court Huittinen Pirkanmaa District Court Humppila Southwest Finland District Court Hyrynsalmi Lapland District Court Hyvinkää Eastern Uusimaa District Court Hämeenkyrö Pirkanmaa District Court Hämeenlinna Southwest Finland District Court Ii Oulu District Court Iisalmi Kymenlaakso District Court Iitti Kymenlaakso District Court Ikaalinen Pirkanmaa District Court Ilmajoki Ostrobothnia District Court Ilomantsi Kymenlaakso District Court Imatra Kymenlaakso District Court Inari Lapland District Court Ingå Eastern Uusimaa District Court Isojoki Ostrobothnia District Court Isokyrö Ostrobothnia District Court Jakobstad Ostrobothnia District Court Janakkala Southwest Finland District Court Joensuu Kymenlaakso District Court Jokioinen Southwest Finland District Court Jomala Åland District Court Joroinen Kymenlaakso District Court Joutsa Ostrobothnia District Court Juuka Kymenlaakso District Court Juupajoki Pirkanmaa District Court Juva Kymenlaakso District Court Jyväskylä Ostrobothnia District Court Jämijärvi Pirkanmaa District Court Jämsä Ostrobothnia District Court Järvenpää Eastern Uusimaa District Court Kaarina Southwest Finland District Court Kaavi Kymenlaakso District Court Kajaani Lapland District Court Kalajoki Oulu District Court Kangasala Pirkanmaa District Court Kangasniemi Kymenlaakso District Court Kankaanpää Pirkanmaa District Court Kannonkoski Ostrobothnia District Court Municipality Competent district court for considering summary civil cases Kannus Ostrobothnia District Court Karijoki Ostrobothnia District Court Karkkila Eastern Uusimaa District Court Karstula Ostrobothnia District Court Karvia Pirkanmaa District Court Kaskinen Ostrobothnia District Court Kauhajoki Ostrobothnia District Court Kauhava Ostrobothnia District Court Kauniainen Eastern Uusimaa District Court Kaustinen Ostrobothnia District Court Keitele Kymenlaakso District Court Kemi Lapland District Court Kemijärvi Lapland District Court Keminmaa Lapland District Court Kempele Oulu District Court Kerava Eastern Uusimaa District Court Keuruu Ostrobothnia District Court Kihniö Pirkanmaa District Court Kimitoön Southwest Finland District Court Kinnula Ostrobothnia District Court Kirkkonummi Eastern Uusimaa District Court Kitee Kymenlaakso District Court Kittilä Lapland District Court Kiuruvesi Kymenlaakso District Court Kivijärvi Ostrobothnia District Court Kokemäki Pirkanmaa District Court Kokkola Ostrobothnia District Court Kolari Lapland District Court Konnevesi Ostrobothnia District Court Kontiolahti Kymenlaakso District Court Korsholm Ostrobothnia District Court Korsnäs Ostrobothnia District Court Koski Tl Southwest Finland District Court Kotka Kymenlaakso District Court Kouvola Kymenlaakso District Court Kristinestad Ostrobothnia District Court Kronoby Ostrobothnia District Court Kuhmo Lapland District Court Kuhmoinen Ostrobothnia District Court Kumlinge Åland District Court Kuopio Kymenlaakso District Court Kuortane Ostrobothnia District Court Kurikka Ostrobothnia District Court Municipality Competent district court for considering summary civil cases Kustavi Southwest Finland District Court Kuusamo Oulu District Court Kyyjärvi Ostrobothnia District Court Kärkölä Kymenlaakso District Court Kärsämäki Oulu District Court Kökar Åland District Court Lahti Kymenlaakso District Court Laihia Ostrobothnia District Court Laitila Southwest Finland District Court Lapinjärvi Eastern Uusimaa District Court Lapinlahti Kymenlaakso District Court Lappajärvi Ostrobothnia District Court Lappeenranta Kymenlaakso District Court Lapua Ostrobothnia District Court Larsmo Ostrobothnia District Court Laukaa Ostrobothnia District Court Lemi Kymenlaakso District Court Lemland Åland District Court Lempäälä Pirkanmaa District Court Leppävirta Kymenlaakso District Court Lestijärvi Ostrobothnia District Court Lieksa Kymenlaakso District Court Lieto Southwest Finland District Court Liminka Oulu District Court Liperi Kymenlaakso District Court Lohja Eastern Uusimaa District Court Loimaa Southwest Finland District Court Loppi Southwest Finland District Court Loviisa Eastern Uusimaa District Court Luhanka Ostrobothnia District Court Lumijoki Oulu District Court Lumparland Åland District Court Luumäki Kymenlaakso District Court Malax Ostrobothnia District Court Mariehamn Åland District Court Marttila Central Finland District Court Masku Central Finland District Court Merijärvi Oulu District Court Merikarvia Pirkanmaa District Court Miehikkälä Kymenlaakso District Court Mikkeli Kymenlaakso District Court Muhos Oulu District Court Multia Ostrobothnia District Court Muonio Lapland District Court Municipality Competent district court for considering summary civil cases Muurame Ostrobothnia District Court Mynämäki Southwest Finland District Court Myrskylä Eastern Uusimaa District Court Mäntsälä Eastern Uusimaa District Court Mänttä-Vilppula Pirkanmaa District Court Mäntyharju Kymenlaakso District Court Naantali Southwest Finland District Court Nakkila Pirkanmaa District Court Nivala Oulu District Court Nokia Pirkanmaa District Court Nousiainen Southwest Finland District Court Nurmes Kymenlaakso District Court Nurmijärvi Eastern Uusimaa District Court Nykarleby Ostrobothnia District Court Närpes Ostrobothnia District Court Orimattila Kymenlaakso District Court Oripää Southwest Finland District Court Orivesi Pirkanmaa District Court Oulainen Oulu District Court Oulu Oulu District Court Outokumpu Kymenlaakso District Court Padasjoki Kymenlaakso District Court Paimio Southwest Finland District Court Paltamo Lapland District Court Pargas Southwest Finland District Court Parikkala Kymenlaakso District Court Parkano Pirkanmaa District Court Pedersöre Ostrobothnia District Court Pelkosenniemi Lapland District Court Pello Lapland District Court Perho Ostrobothnia District Court Pertunmaa Kymenlaakso District Court Petäjävesi Ostrobothnia District Court Pieksämäki Kymenlaakso District Court Pielavesi Kymenlaakso District Court Pihtipudas Ostrobothnia District Court Pirkkala Pirkanmaa District Court Polvijärvi Kymenlaakso District Court Pomarkku Pirkanmaa District Court Pori Pirkanmaa District Court Pornainen Eastern Uusimaa District Court Porvoo Eastern Uusimaa District Court Posio Lapland District Court Municipality Competent district court for considering summary civil cases Pudasjärvi Oulu District Court Pukkila Eastern Uusimaa District Court Punkalaidun Pirkanmaa District Court Puolanka Lapland District Court Puumala Kymenlaakso District Court Pyhtää Eastern Uusimaa District Court Pyhäjoki Oulu District Court Pyhäjärvi Oulu District Court Pyhäntä Oulu District Court Pyhäranta Southwest Finland District Court Pälkäne Pirkanmaa District Court Pöytyä Southwest Finland District Court Raahe Oulu District Court Raisio Southwest Finland District Court Rantasalmi Kymenlaakso District Court Ranua Lapland District Court Raseborg Eastern Uusimaa District Court Rauma Pirkanmaa District Court Rautalampi Kymenlaakso District Court Rautavaara Kymenlaakso District Court Rautjärvi Kymenlaakso District Court Reisjärvi Oulu District Court Riihimäki Southwest Finland District Court Ristijärvi Lapland District Court Rovaniemi Lapland District Court Ruokolahti Kymenlaakso District Court Ruovesi Pirkanmaa District Court Rusko Southwest Finland District Court Rääkkylä Kymenlaakso District Court Saarijärvi Ostrobothnia District Court Salla Lapland District Court Salo Southwest Finland District Court Saltvik Åland District Court Sastamala Pirkanmaa District Court Sauvo Southwest Finland District Court Savitaipale Kymenlaakso District Court Savonlinna Kymenlaakso District Court Savukoski Lapland District Court Seinäjoki Ostrobothnia District Court Sievi Oulu District Court Siikainen Pirkanmaa
Recommended publications
  • Toponymic Guidelines (Pdf)
    UNITED NATIONS GROUP OF EXPERTS ON GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES 22nd session, New York, 20-29 April 2004 Item 17 of the provisional agenda TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP EDITORS AND OTHER EDITORS FINLAND Fourth, revised edition 2004* (v. 4.11, April 2021**) * Prepared by Sirkka Paikkala (Research Institute for the Languages of Finland) in collaboration with the Na- tional Land Survey of Finland (Teemu Leskinen) and the Geographical Society of Finland (Kerkko Hakulinen). The 22nd session of UNGEGN in 2004, WP 49. The first edition of this paper, Toponymic Guidelines for International Cartography - Finland, submitted by Mr. A. Rostvik, Norden Division, was presented to the Ninth session of UNGEGN 1981 (WP 37). The second version, Toponymic guidelines for cartography: Finland, prepared by the Onomastic Division of the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages in collabo- ration with the Swedish Language Division and the National Board of Survey, was presented to the 4th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names in 1982 (E/CONF.74/L.41). The second edition, Toponymic Guidelines for Map an Other Editors, pre- paired by the Finnish Research Centre for Domestic Languages together with National Land Survey, was presented to the 17th session of UNGEGNUnited in 1994 (WP 63). The third edi- tion (revised version), prepared by Sirkka Paikkala in collaboration with the National Land Sur- vey of Finland and the Geographical Society of Finland, was presented to the 7th UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names (New York, 13-22 January 1998, E/CONF.91/L. 17) ** Editions 4.1 - 4.6 updated by Sirkka Paikkala (Institute for the Languages of Finland) and Teemu Leskinen (National Land Survey of Finland).
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market Areas Final Technical Report of the Finnish Project September 2017
    Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 1(37) Labour Market Areas Final Technical report of the Finnish project September 2017 Data collection for sub-national statistics (Labour Market Areas) Grant Agreement No. 08141.2015.001-2015.499 Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Postal address: 3rd floor, FI-00022 Statistics Finland E-mail: [email protected] Yrjö Palttila, Statistics Finland, 22 September 2017 Eurostat – Labour Market Areas – Final Technical report – Finland 2(37) Contents: 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work 1.2 Finland’s national travel-to-work areas 1.3 Tasks of the project 2. Results of the Finnish project 2.1 Improving IT tools to facilitate the implementation of the method (Task 2) 2.2 The finished SAS IML module (Task 2) 2.3 Define Finland’s LMAs based on the EU method (Task 4) 3. Assessing the feasibility of implementation of the EU method 3.1 Feasibility of implementation of the EU method (Task 3) 3.2 Assessing the feasibility of the adaptation of the current method of Finland’s national travel-to-work areas to the proposed method (Task 3) 4. The use and the future of the LMAs Appendix 1. Visualization of the test results (November 2016) Appendix 2. The lists of the LAU2s (test 12) (November 2016) Appendix 3. The finished SAS IML module LMAwSAS.1409 (September 2017) 1. Overview 1.1 Objective of the work In the background of the action was the need for comparable functional areas in EU-wide territorial policy analyses. The NUTS cross-national regions cover the whole EU territory, but they are usually regional administrative areas, which are the re- sult of historical circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispersal and Acclimatization of the Muskrat, Ondatra Zibethicus (L.), in Finland
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Other Publications in Wildlife Management for 1960 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland Atso Artimo Suomen Riistanhoito-Saatio (Finnish Game Foundation) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Artimo, Atso, "The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland" (1960). Other Publications in Wildlife Management. 65. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmother/65 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Other Publications in Wildlife Management by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. R I 1ST A TIE T L .~1 U ( K A I S U J A ,>""'liSt I " e'e 'I >~ ~··21' \. • ; I .. '. .' . .,~., . <)/ ." , ., Thedi$perscdQnd.a~C:li"'dti~otlin. of ,the , , :n~skret, Ond~trq ~ib.t~i~',{(.h in. Firtland , 8y: ATSO ARTIMO . RllSTATIETEELLISljX JULKAISUJA PAPERS ON GAME RESEARCH 21 The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (l.), in Finland By ATSO ARTIMO Helsinki 1960 SUOMEN FIN LANDS R I 1ST A N HOI T O-S A A T I b ] AK TV ARDSSTI FTELSE Riistantutkimuslaitos Viltforskningsinstitutet Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsingfors, Unionsg. 45 B FINNISH GAME FOUNDATION Game Research Institute Helsinki, Unionink. 45 B Helsinki 1960 . K. F. Puromichen Kirjapaino O.-Y. The dispersal and acclimatization of the muskrat, Ondatra zibethicus (L.), in Finland By Atso Artimo CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Environment Brought to You by CORE Provided by Helsingin Yliopiston445 Digitaalinen Arkisto the Finnish Eurowaternet
    445 View metadata, citation and similar papersThe at core.ac.uk Finnish Environment The Finnish Environment brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston445 digitaalinen arkisto The Finnish Eurowaternet ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTECTION Jorma Niemi, Pertti Heinonen, Sari Mitikka, Heidi Vuoristo, The Finnish Eurowaternet Olli-Pekka Pietiläinen, Markku Puupponen and Esa Rönkä (Eds.) with information about Finnish water resources and monitoring strategies The Finnish Eurowaternet The European Environment Agency (EEA) has a political mandate from with information about Finnish water resources the EU Council of Ministers to deliver objective, reliable and comparable and monitoring strategies information on the environment at a European level. In 1998 EEA published Guidelines for the implementation of the EUROWATERNET monitoring network for inland waters. In every Member Country a monitoring network should be designed according to these Guidelines and put into operation. Together these national networks will form the EUROWATERNET monitoring network that will provide information on the quantity and quality of European inland waters. In the future they will be developed to meet the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive. This publication presents the Finnish EUROWATERNET monitoring network put into operation from the first of January, 2000. It includes a total of 195 river sites, 253 lake sites and 74 hydrological baseline sites. Groundwater monitoring network will be developed later. In addition, information about Finnish water resources and current monitoring strategies is given. The publication is available in the internet: http://www.vyh.fi/eng/orginfo/publica/electro/fe445/fe445.htm ISBN 952-11-0827-4 ISSN 1238-7312 EDITA Ltd. PL 800, 00043 EDITA Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to HAMK 2018-2019
    Welcome to HAMK 2018-2019 Table of Content WELCOME TO HÄME UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES ........................................................................... 1 HAMKO – THE STUDENT UNION OF HÄME UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES ......................................... 2 1. FINLAND .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Finland in Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Climate ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Currency and Banks .................................................................................................................................. 4 Electricity .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Transportation .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Shopping and Cost of Living ..................................................................................................................... 6 2. FINNS, FINNISH LANGUAGE AND CULTURE .............................................................................................. 9 Finnish Language ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kohdekortti Ylöjärvi
    356 Isojakokartat 1800-luvun pitäjänkartat 0 0,25 0,5 km 1950-luvun peruskartta Vuoden 2014 peruskartta 0 0,25 0,5 km 0 0,25 0,5 km 357 YLÖJÄRVI Virrat Kihniö Mutalan kulttuurimaisema Mänttä-Vilppula Parkano Ruovesi Ikaalinen Juupajoki Ylöjärvi Hämeenkyrö Orivesi Tampere Kangasala Sastamala Nokia Pirkkala Lempäälä Pälkäne Vesilahti Valkeakoski Punkalaidun Akaa Urjala Pietilän talli Pietilä 1) Historiallisesti arvokas maatalousalue, - säilynyt viljelyksessä (1800-luku tai vanhempi) 2a) Historiallinen kylätontti x 2b) Historiallinen merkittävä tielinja x 3) Kiinteä muinaisjäännös x 5) Arvokas maisema-alue (2013) - 6) Perinteinen ja vaihteleva maisemakuva x 4a) Arvokas rakennettu kulttuuriympäristö (RKY 2009) - 4b) Maakunnallisesti arvokasta rakennettua kulttuuriympäristöä Vesan ja Pietilän pihapiiri Seurantalo Koulu Simolan pihapiiri 1 MK:n MY-alue 1 MK:n MY-alue 1 MK:n akm-alue 1 MK:n akm-alue Niityt Uusi rajaus 2014 Pellot Rakennuskulttuurin ydinalue Asutus Historiallinen tielinja Muinaisjäännös 0 0,25 0,5 km 358 Isojakokartat 1800-luvun pitäjänkartat 0 0,25 0,5 km 1950-luvun peruskartta Vuoden 2014 peruskartta 0 0,25 0,5 km 0 0,25 0,5 km 359 YLÖJÄRVI Virrat Kihniö Lempiäniemen kulttuurimaisema Mänttä-Vilppula Parkano Ruovesi Runsaan ratsutila Ikaalinen - 1400-luvun asuinpaikka Runsaan kylätontti nykyisen Juupajoki Ylöjärvi pihapiirin itäpuolella - talo isojaon jälkeisellä paikalla Hämeenkyrö Orivesi - kantatila jolla ratsutilan historia 1600-luvulta Tampere - päärakennus runko 1800-luvun alusta, muutostyöt Kangasala Sastamala Nokia Pirkkala
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Tax Revenues in Finland Tallinn 13.11.2018
    Onnistuva Suomi tehdään lähellä Finlands framgång skapas lokalt Local government tax revenues in Finland Tallinn 13.11.2018 Henrik Rainio, Director, Municipal Finances The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities Municipalities in Finland • The responsibility of municipalities for social services, healthcare, educational and cultural services, public infrastructure as well as the organisation of other welfare services is extremely significant by international and also European standards. • Local government accounts for two-thirds of public consumption in Finland. • The ratio of the total expenditure of local government to GDP has been about 20% in recent years. • Local government employs about one fifth of the total Finnish labour force. • Municipalities have the right to tax the earned income of their inhabitants (municipal income taxation) and municipalities are paid tax on the basis of the value of real property (tax on real property). Municipalities are also entitled to a share of corporate income tax. 2 Onnistuva Suomi tehdään lähellä Finlands framgång skapas lokalt 14.11.2018 Total municipal sector expenditure and income for 2017 Salaries and Social welfare Tax revenues 51 % wages 36 % and health care 22,6 billion € 15,9 billion € 48 % 21,1 billion € Income tax 43 % Corporate tax 4 % Social security funds Real estate tax 4 % and pensions 10 % Purchase of goods 8 % Education and State grants 19 % Purcahse of Culture 31 % 8,5 billion € services 22 % 13,6 billion € Sales of goods and Subsidies 5 % services 21 % Loan costs 5 % Other 15 % 9,2 billion € Investments 11 % 6,6 billion € Borrowing 5 %, 2,4 mrd. € Financing 6 %, 2,7 billion € Other 3 % Other revenues 4 %, 1,8 mrd.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponyms and Place Heritage As Sources of Place Brand Value
    Paula Sjöblom–Ulla Hakala Toponyms and place heritage as sources of place brand value 1. Introduction Commercial producers have long seen the advantage of branding their products, and the idea of discovering or creating uniqueness also attracts the leaders and governments of countries, states and cities (aShWorth 2009). However, traditional product marketing framework has proved to be inadequate for places; therefore, place branding has rather leaned on corporate branding. Place branding is a long-term, strategic process that requires continuity, and these actions take time to be recognised (KavaratZIS 2009). As generally recognised not only in onomastics but also in marketing, a name can be seen as the core of a brand. Therefore, a place name is the core of a place brand. Having a name is having an identity. A brand name has functions that can be regarded as sources of brand equity, and name changes have proved to cause discomfort and distress amongst consumers (e.g. RounD–RoPER 2012, BRoWn 2016). The name of a place – having stayed unchanged – has traditionally represented permanence and stability and could be regarded as the place’s memory (BASSO 1996, hEllElanD 2009). Referring to lauRa koSTanSki (2016) and her theory of toponymic attachment, place names carry strong emotional and functional attachments. This theory is very important also regarding place branding. According to GRAHAM et al. (2000), heritage can be defined as the past and future in the present. Accordingly, place heritage is heritage which is bound up with physical space that is a place. As for the concept of place, it is a named space (lÉVi-STRauSS 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Contributors of Finngen
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Open Resp Res Contributors of FinnGen Steering Committee Aarno Palotie Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Finland Mark Daly Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Finland Pharmaceutical companies Howard Jacob Abbvie, Chicago, IL, United States Athena Matakidou Astra Zeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom Heiko Runz Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States Sally John Biogen, Cambridge, MA, United States Robert Plenge Celgene, Summit, NJ, United States Mark McCarthy Genentech, San Francisco, CA, United States Julie Hunkapiller Genentech, San Francisco, CA, United States Meg Ehm GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom Dawn Waterworth GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom Caroline Fox Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, United States Anders Malarstig Pfizer, New York, NY, United States Kathy Klinger Sanofi, Paris, France Kathy Call Sanofi, Paris, France University of Helsinki & Biobanks Tomi Mäkelä HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Finland, Finland Jaakko Kaprio Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, Helsinki, Finland, Finland Petri Virolainen Auria Biobank / Univ. of Turku / Hospital District of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland Kari Pulkki Auria Biobank / Univ. of Turku / Hospital District of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland Terhi Kilpi THL Biobank / Finnish Institute
    [Show full text]
  • Kutsuntakuulutus
    1 (2) Kutsuntakuulutus Asevelvollisuuslain (1438/2007) ja Valtioneuvoston asetuksen asevelvollisuudesta (1443/2007) nojalla toimitetaan vuonna 2003 syntyneiden sekä muiden alempana mainittujen asevelvollisten kutsunnat Uudenmaan aluetoimiston alueella vuonna 2021 seuraavassa järjestyksessä: Saapukaa paikalle viimeistään 15 minuuttia aiemmin, jotta ehditte ilmoittautua ennen tilaisuuden alkua. Kunta Sukunimen alkukirjaimet Päivämäärä Päivä Aika Kutsuntapaikka SIPOO AAA - LIE 16.8.2021 ma 9.00 Kirkonkylän srk-talo, Iso Kylätie 1 LIF - ÖÖÖ 17.8.2021 ti 9.00 ” MÄNTSÄLÄ AAA - MAL 19.8.2021 to 9.00 Kunnantalo, Heikinkuja 4 MAM - ÖÖÖ 20.8.2021 pe 9.00 ” ASKOLA - PORNAINEN AAA - ÖÖÖ 23.8.2021 ma 9.00 Askola-Areena, Linnankoskentie 61, ASKOLA INKOO - SIUNTIO AAA - ÖÖÖ 24.8.2021 ti 9.00 Västankvarn Gård, Västankvarnintie 384, INKOO HANKO AAA - ÖÖÖ 25.8.2021 ke 9.00 Kaupungintalon juhlatilat, Vuorikatu 1 RAASEPORI AAA - LUO 26.8.2021 to 9.00 Tammisaaren nuorisotalo, Ystadinkatu 14 LUP - ÖÖÖ 27.8.2021 pe 9.00 ” TUUSULA AAA - MUR 30.8.2021 ma 9.00 Puolustusvoimien kurssikeskus, Rantatie 66, TUUSULA MUS- ÖÖÖ 31.8.2021 ti 9.00 " JÄRVENPÄÄ AAA - MAL 1.9.2021 ke 9.00 Puolustusvoimien kurssikeskus, Rantatie 66, TUUSULA MAM - ÖÖÖ 2.9.2021 to 9.00 " KERAVA AAA - MAR 6.9.2021 ma 9.00 Puolustusvoimien kurssikeskus, Rantatie 66, TUUSULA MAS - ÖÖÖ 7.9.2021 ti 9.00 ” HYVINKÄÄ AAA - KIT 8.9.2021 ke 9.00 Seurakuntakeskus, Hämeenkatu 16 KIU - PUD 9.9.2021 to 9.00 " PUE - ÖÖÖ 10.9.2021 pe 9.00 " LOVIISA - LAPINJÄRVI AAA - ÖÖÖ 14.9.2021 ti 9.00 Loviisan liikuntahalli,
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki-Uusimaa Region Uusimaa Regional Council City of Helsinki Picture Bank / Mika Lappalainen
    Helsinki-Uusimaa Region Uusimaa Regional Council City of Helsinki Picture Bank / Mika Lappalainen Helsinki-Uusimaa Region The Helsinki-Uusimaa Region is at the Uusimaa is the most urbanised area in heart of northern Europe. Located on the Finland with the Baltic Sea playing a major south coast of Finland it is home to around role in its life. Agricultural landscapes and 1.4 million people or more than a quarter of the rocky terrain along the coast are the the country’s total population. The annual most common views encountered outside population growth of Uusimaa is about the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Forests also 13,000 and the percentage of young adults cover vast areas of Uusimaa – as they do - those under the age of 40 - is particularly most of Finland. high. Half of all the immigrants in Finland The region as a whole is characterised by live in the region. a strong historical and social identity and, The Helsinki Metropolitan Area cities like the rest of Finland, Uusimaa is bilingual of Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa and Kauniainen in the official languages of Finnish and form the core of Uusimaa. Swedish. Helsinki-Uusimaa Region • Employment - services 80.8 % • Capital region of Finland - secondary production 18.6 % - agriculture 0.6 % • 21 municipalities, the largest demographic and consumption concentration in Finland • Excellence in environmental conditions - 300 km of coastline • 1,4 M inhabitants, 26 % of total - two national parks population of Finland - growth 13 000 / year • Qualified human and scientific resources - foreign population
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Migration in Finland and the Context of Integration Policy
    1. MIGRATION IN FINLAND AND THE CONTEXT OF INTEGRATION POLICY – 45 Chapter 1 Migration in Finland and the context of integration policy Despite rapid growth over the past 25 years, Finland’s migrant population is not large in international comparison. The foreign-born in Finland, however, come from a diverse range of countries and bring with them a concomitantly wide range of integration service needs. The increase in inflows – particularly asylum seekers – in 2015, put a strain on the Finnish integration system, which was designed to support far fewer migrants. And important changes were introduced as the system struggled to maintain efficiency in the fact of increasing demand. These changes included integration services organised into modules that could be more easily combined into a tailored package of measures and the introduction of the Social Impact Bond to harness private finance in support of integration. If effective in ensuring Finland’s migrants are well integrated in society and on the labour market, these investments will help to alleviate the ageing-related challenges the country expects in the coming years.. This chapter provides the context for the report outlining i) the integration context, and the characteristics and composition of Finland’s foreign-born population that influence their integration outcomes, as well as the labour market context and challenges this presents, before turning to ii) the recent developments in integration policy in Finland. WORKING TOGETHER: SKILLS AND LABOUR MARKET INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANTS AND THEIR CHILDREN IN FINLAND © OECD 2018 46 – 1. MIGRATION IN FINLAND AND THE CONTEXT OF INTEGRATION POLICY Over the last quarter of a century, Finland’s foreign-born population has been growing at a compound annual rate of 6.8 %; where the foreign-born accounted for just 1% of the Finnish population in 1990, in 2016 they accounted for close to 6.5%.
    [Show full text]