Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU
All USU Press Publications USU Press
1998
Reflection in the ritingW Classroom
Kathleen Blake Yancey University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs
Part of the Rhetoric and Composition Commons
Recommended Citation Yancey, Kathleen Blake, "Reflection in the ritingW Classroom" (1998). All USU Press Publications. 120. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs/120
This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Reflection in the Writing Classroom
Reflection in the Writing Classroom
KATHLEEN BLAKE YANCEY University ofNorth Carolina, Charlotte
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Logan, Utah 1998 Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800
© Copyright 1998 Utah State University Press. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States ofAmerica.
Typography by WoltPack
98 99 00 01 02 543 2
Library ofCongress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Yancey, Kathleen Blake Reflection in the writing classroom / Kathleen Blake Yancey. p. em. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-87421-238-3 (pbk.) 1. English language-Rhetoric-Study and teaching. 2. Report writing-Study and teaching. 3. Reflection (Philosophy) I. Title. PE1404.Y36 1998 808'.042'07-dc21 97-45395 CIP CONTENTS
PREFACE VI
ONE On Reflection
TWO Reflection-in-Action 23
THREE Constructive Reflection 49
FOUR Reflection-in-Presentation 69
FIVE Reflective Reading, Reflective Responding 97
SIX Reflection and the Writing Course 125
SEVEN Reflection and Assessment 145
EIGHT Literacy and the Curriculum 169
NINE Reflective Texts, Reflective Writers 185
WORKS CITED 207
INDEX 213 PREFACE
THIS VOLUME GREW OUT OF A FOCUSED INQUIRY: WHAT CONVERSATIONS, I wanted to ask, could we have around texts in order to foster reflective habits of mind? What you'll read in the following pages constitutes my attempt at an extended answer. Because it is a book-length vol ume, I've taken the luxury of thinking about this question in multi ple ways: theoretically, pragmatically, and-I hope-reflectively. I've located my responses to this focused inquiry within my own practice, to be sure, but I've tried both to theorize that practice and to make it visible so that others can read themselves into this story as well. Ultimately, as I hope is apparent, I'm as interested in the questions raised in the process of inquiry as I am in the answers we construct. They are foundation and means of reflection, both. More specifically, what I've done here is to re-theorize Donald Schon's theory of reflection for use in the writing classroom, and in that process to think about how we might use reflection as a mode of helping students develop as writers. I've written this volume, then, because I think through reflection we can change both the teaching and learning of writing. What I also do here is show how we might begin making some ofthose changes, and suggest some ofwhat we teachers and students-could learn if we understood the writing classroom as a reflective practicum, as a new kind of writing class room, one where students are writers, reflection is woven into the curriculum, and practice becomes art. I was fortunate in having the support of many at my institution, the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. In particular, I want to thank the University, the Faculty Grants Committee, and Dean Schley Lyons for an academic leave to support this work. Preface vii
There are several people whose contributions to this project I'd like to acknowledge. Michael Spooner, my editor and friend: (again) thanks. Also: Irwin Weiser and Afhild Ingberg, for reading sympa thetic