DOCSLIB.ORG

The Two Dozen Items Assembled Here Come from the Second Half of That Era

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Two Dozen Items Assembled Here Come from the Second Half of That Era �34 Book Reviews Philip A. Stadter Plutarch and his Roman Readers (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), x + 394 pp. $175.00. ISBN 9780198718338 (hbk). Philip Stadter has been publishing excellent scholarship on Plutarch for fifty years; the two dozen items assembled here come from the second half of that era. Through these essays every topic in Plutarchan scholarship arises but the connecting thread is Plutarch’s politically and socially influential Roman tar- get audience, who they were, how they were connected to Plutarch, and how Plutarch’s works, especially his Parallel Lives, developed amidst those relation- ships and could have and most probably did affect them. These essays have appeared in a host of international publications which are not always at hand, two are (still) forthcoming, two were previously published in Italian, and the first chapter is wholly new; some slight additions to the notes have been made. As one studies these chapters as a set, one thinks of Plutarch’s own works, the Moralia and the Parallel Lives, how they were written over many decades of a long and accomplished career, and how the latter reflect on the earlier writ- ings yet at the same time reveal a sound depth and sense already present in the earliest pieces. A constant feature of Stadter’s work is how he examines a Plutarchan detail with the larger rhetorical, historical, and political context always in mind. The pervasive depth of Stadter’s knowledge and the richness of his perspective make this set of essays the ideal companion to the study of Plutarch. Stadter’s study of Plutarch began in the 1960s when prosopographical work focused on the reconstruction of the web of relationships that Plutarch, and other Greeks, had with Roman elites. Plutarch’s interactions with these elites have been an enriching topic of study for its general historical value but also as an avenue to study the motives behind the writing of his Parallel Lives and much in the Moralia. In Chapter 1, ‘Friends or Patrons?’, Stadter considers the relationships with these Roman elites not simply as Plutarch’s friends but also as his socio-political superiors, as ruling Romans granting favors to a subject Greek. The thoroughness in postulating possible favors is admirable as is the thoroughness in pointing to known sources and the frankness in marking limi- tations. Chapter 2 then examines some of the evidence for this interaction and how it worked, such as Plutarch’s use of Latin, his thoughts on Greeks pursuing politics under Roman rule, and the role of philosophy in politics, with the dou- ble Life of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus used to illustrate how the best sorts, both personally and publicly, can all go wrong. (On the subject of this chapter see also Stadter’s chapter ‘Plutarch and Rome’ as well as Christopher Pelling’s © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi �0.��63/�05��996-��34009� Book Reviews �35 ‘Political Philosophy’ in the new Blackwell A Companion to Plutarch, ed. Mark Beck [2014].) Chapter 3 presents a fascinating assessment of the mostly lost Lives of the Caesars, from Augustus to Vitellius (only the short Galba and dam- aged Otho survive). Of particular importance is Stadter’s persuasive argument for dating the set amidst Vespasian’s reign. Chapters 4 and 5 use Delphi and Roman interest there to examine the role of the oracle in Plutarch’s works and in his own life. Out of the abundance of rel- evant inscriptions, along with Plutarch’s near silence of his own role at Delphi, Stadter reconstructs in Chapter 4 a narrative both of events, religious, finan- cial, and architectural, over the course of Plutarch’s life and also of the roles of an array of elite Romans at the shrine. Chapter 5 supplements the preceding by surveying the presence, and absence, of Delphi and oracular responses in the Parallel Lives. I would note that the use here of Sulla 29.11-13, where Sulla pulls out a little statuette of Apollo and prays to it, is far more problematic than Stadter suggests (p. 93); Sulla 29.10 graphically details how Sulla’s sharp-eyed groom saved the oblivious Sulla, and the statuette itself is surely not ‘had from Delphi’ (p. 93) but rather extorted or stolen from the shrine, as Sulla 12.6 (cf. too the verbs used in the parallel Latin accounts: sublatum or ablatum [epitomes of Val. Max.,1.2.3] and sustulerat [Fron. Str. 1.11]). Chapter 6, a survey of the nine books of Table Talks, serves as a bridge between the socio-political background that Stadter has established in earlier chapters and the turn to the narratives in the Parallel Lives to follow. Chapter 7, ‘Leading the Party, Leading the City: The Symposiarch as politikos’, is the only essay in the collection that is somewhat redundant but it makes explicit the important political relevance of the Table Talks that is hinted at in the prior essay. Chapter 8 succinctly surveys Plutarch’s intellectual background, his career and decision to write the Lives, his sources, the choice of subjects and their par- alleling. Like Stadter’s preface to the Oxford translation by Robin Waterfield, Plutarch: Greek Lives (1998), but with updated bibliography, this essay is the best starting point for any reading of the Lives. The seemingly narrow focus of Chapter 9, ‘Plutarch’s Latin Reading: Cicero’s Lucullus and Horace’s Epistle 1.6’, broadens out from a question of language competence and source use into a view of the intellectual and political interaction between Rome and Greece through Plutarch’s own life and through his biography of Lucullus. Chapter 10 usefully compiles Plutarch’s knowledge and use of the Roman cursus honorum, seeing it as a barometer of the political weather in Rome. In Chapter 11 Stadter uses Pliny’s Panegyric of AD 100 as a foil for the style and moral purpose of Plutarch’s Lives, with a particular eye for criticism of Domitian who serves as a negative parallel to Trajan. Chapter 12, ‘The Justice of Trajan in Pliny Epistles 10 polis, The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 33 (�0�6) �73-�4�.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rome. the Etymological Origins
    ROME.THE ETYMOLOGICAL ORIGINS Enrique Cabrejas — Director Linguistic Studies, Regen Palmer (Barcelona, Spain) E-mail: [email protected] The name of Rome was always a great mystery. Through this taxonomic study of Greek and Latin language, Enrique Cabrejas gives us the keys and unpublished answers to understand the etymology of the name. For thousands of years never came to suspect, including about the founder Romulus the reasons for the name and of his brother Remus, plus the unknown place name of the Lazio of the Italian peninsula which housed the foundation of ancient Rome. Keywords: Rome, Romulus, Remus, Tiber, Lazio, Italy, Rhea Silvia, Numitor, Amulio, Titus Tatius, Aeneas, Apollo, Aphrodite, Venus, Quirites, Romans, Sabines, Latins, Ἕλενος, Greeks, Etruscans, Iberians, fortuitus casus, vis maior, force majeure, rape of the Sabine, Luperca, Capitoline wolf, Palladium, Pallas, Vesta, Troy, Plutarch, Virgil, Herodotus, Enrique Cabrejas, etymology, taxonomy, Latin, Greek, ancient history , philosophy of language, acronyms, phrases, grammar, spelling, epigraphy, epistemology. Introduction There are names that highlight by their size or their amazing story. And from Rome we know his name, also history but what is the meaning? The name of Rome was always a great mystery. There are numerous and various hypotheses on the origin, list them again would not add any value to this document. My purpose is to reveal the true and not add more conjectures. Then I’ll convey an epistemology that has been unprecedented for thousands of years. So this theory of knowledge is an argument that I could perfectly support empirically. Let me take that Rome was founded as a popular legend tells by the brothers Romulus and Remus, suckled by a she-wolf, and according to other traditions by Romulus on 21 April 753 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Horace - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series Horace - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive Horace(8 December 65 BC – 27 November 8 BC) Quintus Horatius Flaccus, known in the English-speaking world as Horace, was the leading Roman lyric poet during the time of Augustus. The rhetorician Quintillian regarded his Odes as almost the only Latin lyrics worth reading, justifying his estimate with the words: "He can be lofty sometimes, yet he is also full of charm and grace, versatile in his figures, and felicitously daring in his choice of words." Horace also crafted elegant hexameter verses (Sermones and Epistles) and scurrilous iambic poetry (Epodes). The hexameters are playful and yet serious works, leading the ancient satirist Persius to comment: "as his friend laughs, Horace slyly puts his finger on his every fault; once let in, he plays about the heartstrings". Some of his iambic poetry, however, can seem wantonly repulsive to modern audiences. His career coincided with Rome's momentous change from Republic to Empire. An officer in the republican army that was crushed at the Battle of Philippi in 42 BC, he was befriended by Octavian's right-hand man in civil affairs, Maecenas, and became something of a spokesman for the new regime. For some commentators, his association with the regime was a delicate balance in which he maintained a strong measure of independence (he was "a master of the graceful sidestep") but for others he was, in < a href="http://www.poemhunter.com/john-henry-dryden/">John Dryden's</a> phrase, "a well-mannered court slave".
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Political Philosophy of Plutarch's Alexander
    “If I were not Alexander…” An Examination of the Political Philosophy of Plutarch’s Alexander- Caesar Richard Buckley-Gorman A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Classics 2016 School of Art History, Classics and Religious Studies 1 | P a g e Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………………3 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Chapter One: Plutarch’s Methodology…………………………………………………………….8 Chapter Two: The Alexander………………………………………………………………………….18 Chapter Three: Alexander and Caesar……………………………………………………………47 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………….71 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………………….73 2 | P a g e Acknowledgements Firstly and foremost to my supervisor Jeff Tatum, for his guidance and patience. Secondly to my office mates James, Julia, Laura, Nikki, and Tim who helped me when I needed it and made research and writing more fun and less productive than it would otherwise have been. I would also like to thank my parents, Sue and Phil, for their continuous support. 3 | P a g e Abstract This thesis examines Plutarch’s Alexander-Caesar. Plutarch’s depiction of Alexander has been long recognised as encompassing many defects, including an overactive thumos and a decline in character as the narrative progresses. In this thesis I examine the way in which Plutarch depicts Alexander’s degeneration, and argue that the defects of Alexander form a discussion on the ethics of kingship. I then examine the implications of pairing the Alexander with the Caesar; I examine how some of the themes of the Alexander are reflected in the Caesar. I argue that the status of Caesar as both a figure from the Republican past and the man who established the Empire gave the pair a unique immediacy to Plutarch’s time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lex Sempronia Agraria: a Soldier's Stipendum
    THE LEX SEMPRONIA AGRARIA: A SOLDIER’S STIPENDUM by Raymond Richard Hill A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Boise State University August 2016 © 2016 Raymond Richard Hill ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Raymond Richard Hill Thesis Title: The Lex Sempronia Agraria: A Soldier’s Stipendum Date of Final Oral Examination: 16 June 2016 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Raymond Richard Hill, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Katherine V. Huntley, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Lisa McClain, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Lee Ann Turner, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Katherine V. Huntley, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by Jodi Chilson, M.F.A., Coordinator of Theses and Dissertations. DEDICATION To Kessa for all of her love, patience, guidance and support. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Katherine Huntley for her hours spent proofing my work, providing insights and making suggestions on research materials. To Dr. Charles Matson Odahl who started this journey with me and first fired my curiosity about the Gracchi. To the history professors of Boise State University who helped me become a better scholar. v ABSTRACT This thesis examines mid-second century BCE Roman society to determine the forces at work that resulted in the passing of a radical piece of legislation known as the lex Sempronia agraria.
    [Show full text]
  • [Life of Pompey] , Latin Translation by Antonius Tudertinus Pacinus
    PLUTARCH, Pompei viri illustris vita [Life of Pompey] , Latin translation by Antonius Tudertinus Pacinus [or Jacopo Angeli da Scarperia] In Latin, decorated manuscript on paper Northern Italy, Lombardy, perhaps Ferrara or Mantova?, c. 1470-80 71 ff., preceded and followed by [3] paper flyleaves, complete (collation: i-vi10, vii10+1), vertical catchwords, on thick paper with watermark of the type Briquet, “Basilic,” no. 2671: Ferrare, 1471 or no. 2672-2673: Mantoue, 1478-1483, written in an Italian humanistic slightly sloping cursive script, in brown ink, on up to 21 long lines (justification 140 x 90 mm.), headings in margins in pale red ink, blank space left for initial on fol. 1, contemporary marginal annotations in brown ink. Nineteenth-century English brown Russia binding, smooth back with blind tooling and gilt lettering: ”Pompei Vita / Plutarchus / MS.”, blind-stamped and gilt with monogram and motto on upper board, and arms on lower cover, brown paper endleaves, edges gilt (Upper inner hinge loose, binding a bit scuffed, occasional minor stains to paper, else in very good condition). Dimensions 215 x 155 mm. Containing Plutarch’s life of Pompey the Great, the Roman republican hero often hailed as an antagonist of tyranny, this is one of about 50 recorded Renaissance manuscripts of the Latin translation from the Greek original completed by either Antonius Tudertinus Pacinus or Jacopo Angeli da Scarperia. The present manuscript provides testimony that the lives continued to circulate independently in manuscript form, even after their assembly into one common collection. PROVENANCE 1. Script and watermarks all point to an Italian origin for this manuscript, likely Northern Italy, Lombardy.
    [Show full text]
  • V.S. Lectures, No. 89 HORACE's VIRGIL Summary of a Lecture
    - 13 - V.S. Lectures, No. 89 HORACE’S VIRGIL Summary of a lecture delivered to the Virgil Society 23rd November 1968 by Prof. L.A. Moritz, M.A., D.Phil. It can be established on various grounds that the Vergilius to whom Hor.Od.iv.12 (lam veris comites) is addressed must, after all, be the poet Virgil. But the question then arises how Horace could have published this poem, with its mixture of elegiac description of spring and jocular invitation to his friend and fellow-poet, six years after the latter's death. This question in turn raises the wider problem of how Augustan poets addressed each other in their published work when they had the opportunity. Elsewhere in the Odes (i.3 and i.24) Virgil, though established as a poet in the Satires, is neither the poet nor the fellow-member of Maecenas's circle, but simply the friend. When Varius Rufus (i.6 ), Iullus Antonius (iv.2), and Asinius Pollio (ii.l) are addressed as poets, or when Pollio (ibid.) and Maecenas (ii.12) are addressed as historians, Horace is concerned with the public nature of their work rather than with any private relationship, and Tibullus in i-33 is primarily the unhappy lover rather than the elegist. But while in the Carmina (as opposed to the Sermones) there is no explicit reference to Virgil's poetry, both the Carmen Saeculare and the fourth book of Odes are so full of echoes of the Aeneid, both in "public" and in less public poems, that they may rank as Horace's monuments to Virgil, even though nothing is said of Virgil the poet.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SECOND BOOK of LETTERS Hans-Christian Günther 1
    THE SECOND BOOK OF LETTERS Hans-Christian Günther Abstract: The second book of Epistles speaks of poetological themes in two very long compositions, as does the Ars Poetica. The analysis of both letters (to Florus and Augustus) pays strict attention to the coherence of the train of thought and its relevance to the alleged epistolary situation and tries to show how Horace de nes the role of poetry, of his poetry, in particular, in contemporary society. Keywords: poetry and politics, poetological poetry 1. The Second Book of Letters and Horace’s ‘Sptwerk’ As we know more about the real person of Horace than about any other great poet of classical antiquity we also know much more about his devel- opment as an artist, his artistic self-consciousness and self-awareness. No other poet of antiquity comments so much on his own work, no other poet bequeathed to us such a large corpus of self-interpretation. It seems trivial to insist on these facts again, yet, I feel I must do so, because well-known as it is, this aspect of Horace’s work is far from being appreciated as poignantly as it should. On the contrary, it seems to me that this exceptional trait of Horace’s poetry is not seen in proper perspective, because everything today is interpreted as metapoetry; thus, the reservoir that Horace’s exceptionally explicit, detailed, and penetrating self-interpretation holds for understand- ing his poetry is far from being exploited. The awareness of his own self as a poet that Horace displays in his poetry is indivisible from the supreme self-awareness, evident in the autobiographical dimension of his work as sketched above in the introductory chapter on Horace’s biography.1 This Horatian self-awareness is of crucial importance for the understanding of Horace’s late work; in fact, Horace is the rst poet of European literature whose ‘Spätwerk’ we can isolate on the evidence of what the poet says him- self about his poetic iter.2 1 Above, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 10: Module No 04: E Text
    Paper 10: Module No 04: E Text MHRD-UGC ePG Pathshala - English Principal Investigator & Affiliation: Prof. Tutun Mukherjee, University of Hyderabad Paper No & Title: Literary Criticism and Theory (Paper 10) Paper Coordinator & Affiliation: Dr. Anita Bhela, Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, University of Delhi Module Number & Title: Criticism in the Classical Antiquity: Longinus, Horace (04) Content Writer's Name & Affiliation: Mr. Lalit Kumar, University of Delhi Name & Affiliation of Content Reviewer Dr. Anita Bhela, Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, University of Delhi Name & Affiliation of Content Editor: Dr. Anita Bhela, Delhi College of Arts and Commerce, University of Delhi Criticism in Greco-Roman Culture: an Introduction The word criticism springs from the Greek word krisis, which had various meanings in the classical antiquity including ‘separation’, ‘selection’ and ‘judgement’. All these meanings were central to the decisions taken in courts and poetic contests, which were popular forms of literary practices prevalent across various city states of Greece. (Day 10) Since the inception of literature and literary criticism then [though Greeks did not have a word for literature] readers needed to separate, judge and select from a plethora of plays and poetry available to them. The ‘bad Poetry’ that could have potentially amoral impact on the readers was to be separated from the ‘good poetry’. Plato did the job of putting an end to the crisis of readers by separating the chaff from the grain and argued that in the ideal ‘republic’ children should hear only good fables, not the bad ones. He offered a trenchant critique of the anthropomorphism of Gods, championed and institutionalized by Homer and Hesiod.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutarch's Lysander and Sulla: Integrated Characters in Roman Historical Perspective
    PLUTARCH'S LYSANDER AND SULLA: INTEGRATED CHARACTERS IN ROMAN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE THE TERM ritratto paradossale has been used to describe a formula of character portrayal seen in Latin literature of the first centuries B.C. and A.D. whose basic process consists in combining in one character appar- ently contradictory traits (La Penna 1976). To be precise, the formula produced a type of man who in his moments of action shows energy, diligence, and constancy but exhibits licentious feelings, allows himself to be taken in by indolence, and succumbs to pleasures when his nego­ tia are finished. This model may already have been present in Greek historical literature of the fourth century B.c., as the portrait of Philip I1 that the historian Theopompus delineates seems to bear this stamp. The public image of Maecenas and the Petronius of Tacitus are two clear ex- amples of ritratto paradossale. The figure of Sulla also falls under this influence; in fact, according to La Penna (1976, 284), Plutarch's biogra- phy of Sulla often exhibits these same characteristics. The terms "paradox" and "paradoxical" also occur frequently in works devoted to Plutarch's Life of Lysander. Its paradoxical features are the central point of Pelling's comments (1988a, 268-74) on that bi- ography. Pelling explores aspects of "integration" in the Parallel Lives, a technique of portrayal which he defines as follows: "a man's qualities are brought into some sort of relation with one another, and every trait goes closely with the next."l An almost universal literary habit in the 'Pelling 1988a, 262.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of the Plutarchan Book
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Central Archive at the University of Reading TIMOTHY E. DUFF The Structure of the Plutarchan Book This study focuses not on individual Lives or pairs of Lives, but on the book as a whole and its articulation across the full corpus. It argues that the Plutarchan book consists of up to four distinct sections: prologue, first Life, second Life, synkrisis. Each of these sections has a fairly consistent internal structure, and each has a distinct set of strategies for opening, for closure, and for managing the transition from one section to the next. Prologues provide an introduction to both Lives, and are clearly delineated from them, even though in our manuscripts they appear as part of the first Life; in fact, there is often a stronger break between prologue and first Life than there is between the two Lives themselves. Prologues usually begin with generalized reflections, to be followed only later by the naming of the subjects and a statement of their similarities. Most Lives begin with a thematically organized section (the ‘proemial opening’), which surveys the subject’s life as a whole, not just their youth, and which is marked off with varying degrees of distinctness from the narrative that follows. Crucially, proemial openings do not narrate and the logic of their structure is not chronological. Closure in many Lives is signalled by ‘circularity’ and sometimes by a closural or transitional phrase, though first Lives are different here from second Lives. Synkriseis are structured both by a series of themes on which the two subjects are compared, and by a two-part, agonistic structure in which first one of the subjects is preferred, then the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Atypical Lives: Systems of Meaning in Plutarch's Teseus-Romulus by Joel Martin Street a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisf
    Atypical Lives: Systems of Meaning in Plutarch's Teseus-Romulus by Joel Martin Street A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Mark Griffith, Chair Professor Dylan Sailor Professor Ramona Naddaff Fall 2015 Abstract Atypical Lives: Systems of Meaning in Plutarch's Teseus-Romulus by Joel Martin Street Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Berkeley Professor Mark Griffith, Chair Tis dissertation takes Plutarch’s paired biographies of Teseus and Romulus as a path to understanding a number of roles that the author assumes: as a biographer, an antiquarian, a Greek author under Roman rule. As the preface to the Teseus-Romulus makes clear, Plutarch himself sees these mythological fgures as qualitatively different from his other biographical sub- jects, with the consequence that this particular pair of Lives serves as a limit case by which it is possible to elucidate the boundaries of Plutarch’s authorial identity. Tey present, moreover, a set of opportunities for him to demonstrate his ability to curate and present familiar material (the founding of Rome, Teseus in the labyrinth) in demonstration of his broad learning. To this end, I regard the Teseus-Romulus as a fundamentally integral text, both of whose parts should be read alongside one another and the rest of Plutarch’s corpus rather than as mere outgrowths of the tra- ditions about the early history of Athens and Rome, respectively. Accordingly, I proceed in each of my four chapters to attend closely to a particular thematic cluster that appears in both Lives, thereby bringing to light the complex fgural play by which Plutarch enlivens familiar material and demonstrates his virtuosity as author.
    [Show full text]
  • «Prometheus» 45, 2019, 175-181 CAESAR's VENI VIDI VICI AND
    «Prometheus» 45, 2019, 175-181 CAESAR’S VENI VIDI VICI AND PLUTARCH In two papers, published in 2010 and 2012 respectively, and sub- sequently taken up, with minor changes, in his 2014 book Plutarch and his Roman Readers1, Philip A. Stadter contends that both the quotation from Horace2 and the mention and appraisal of Cicero’s Lucullus3 contained in Plutarch’s Life of Lucullus proceed from a direct reading of the two Roman writers rather than from second-hand knowledge. Though this position differs from the opinion more commonly held, it must be admitted that Stadter pleads his case with plausible arguments, though of course insufficient to attain certainty, as he himself is ready to admit4. The purpose of this paper, however, is not to discuss this matter. At the end of the second of these essays Stadter adds an appendix entitled Plutarch’s Aesthetic Appreciation of Latin, treating the same problems discussed in a paper of mine published some years earlier5. Contrary to my contention, and to the opinion of most scholars, Stadter maintains that Plutarch’s renouncing to compare Demosthenes and Cicero as orators for being avowedly unqualified to assess the stylistic merits achieved by Cicero in Latin, preceded by the remark about his having started to 1 P.A. Stadter, Plutarch’s Latin Reading: the Case of Cicero’s Lucullus, in: L. Van der Stockt, F. Titchener, H.G. Ingenkamp, A. Pérez Jiménez (eds.), Gods, Daimones, Rituals, Myths and History of Religions in Plutarch’s Works. Studies Devoted to Professor Frederik E. Brenk by the International Plutarch Society, Logan Utah 2010, 407-418; P.A.
    [Show full text]