DOCSLIB.ORG

2015-03 Planning Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015-03 Planning Study Report MARCH 2015 Table of Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................................................... v 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Visioning Team (PVT) Project Kick-Off Meeting ............................................................ 3 2 Existing Conditions (Data Collection) ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Transportation System Characteristics ............................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Roadway Characteristics ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Roadway Classification ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.3 Street Cross-Section .................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1.4 Parking ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities .......................................................................................................... 8 2.1.6 Transit ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.7 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) .............................................................................. 11 2.1.8 Bike-On-Bus ................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Existing Travel Demand Characteristics ......................................................................................... 12 2.2.1 Traffic Volumes (Annual Average Daily Traffic – AADT) ......................................................... 12 2.2.2 Activity Centers ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2.3 Turning Movement Counts ................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.4 Transit Ridership ...................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Traffic ............................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Corridor Operations Summary ........................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1 Safety ............................................................................................................................................................. 21 2.4 Land Use/Community Characteristics ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.5 Soils and Flood Maps ............................................................................................................................... 29 2.6 Identification Summary of Issues and Constraints ..................................................................... 29 3 Planning Review/Needs Assessment .................................................................................................................. 31 3.1 Review of Previous Plans ...................................................................................................................... 31 i MARCH 2015 3.1.1 City of Ocala Annual Plan – 2012 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Action Plan (2012) ................................................................................................................................................ 31 3.1.2 City of Ocala Downtown Master Plan (2004) ................................................................................ 31 3.1.3 City of Ocala Parking Study and Master Plan (2010) ................................................................. 32 3.1.4 City of Ocala Recreation & Parks Master Plan (2010) ............................................................... 32 3.1.5 Ocala/Marion Design Guidelines – Bicycle/Pedestrian Master Plan Update (2004) ... 33 3.1.6 Ocala 2035 Vision Plan (2010) ........................................................................................................... 33 3.1.7 2008-2012 Traffic Counts & Trends Manual (2012) ................................................................. 34 3.1.8 Tuscawilla Park Master Plan (2014) ................................................................................................ 35 3.1.9 FDOT Traffic Operation and Access Management Improvements (2014) ....................... 34 3.1.10 FDOT Roadway Study: SR 40 from Magnolia Avenue to NE 1st Avenue (2014) ............. 35 3.2 Understanding the Project Purpose and Need ............................................................................. 35 3.2.1 Understanding the Streetside .............................................................................................................. 37 3.2.2 Best Practices ............................................................................................................................................. 38 3.3 Baseline Future Conditions Needs Assessment ........................................................................... 42 4 Alternatives Identification/Development ......................................................................................................... 45 4.1 Initial Concept Plans & Exhibits ......................................................................................................... 45 4.1.1 Alternative A – Raised Median Concept .......................................................................................... 46 4.1.2 Alternative B – Lane Reduction Concept ........................................................................................ 49 4.1.3 Conceptual Ocala Downtown Park Block Intersection Alternatives ................................... 52 4.2 Preliminary Assessment of Alternatives ......................................................................................... 54 4.2.1 Planning-Level Cost Estimates ............................................................................................................ 57 4.2.2 TransValU Tool Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 60 5 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT MEETING ..................................................................................................... 61 6 SELECT ALTERNATIVES AND NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................................... 62 6.1 Selected Improvement Strategies Recommended for Further Analysis ............................ 62 6.2 Next Steps .................................................................................................................................................... 64 ii MARCH 2015 List of Figures Figure 1: Project Study Area ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: Functional Classification System ................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Existing Lane Configuration ............................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 4: SR 40/Silver Springs Boulevard Typical Cross Section, 90’ ROW (US 441 to Osceola Avenue) ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 5: SR 40/Silver Springs Boulevard Typical Cross Section, 80’ ROW (Osceola Avenue to US 441) ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 6: Existing Sidewalk (Pedestrian) Network ................................................................................................... 9 Figure 7: Regional Bike Trail Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 8: SunTran Bus Routes in the City of Ocala. ................................................................................................. 10 Figure 9: 2013 Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Turnpike Corridor
    1 NORTHERN TURNPIKE CONNECTOR 2 TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT 3 November 15, 2020 4 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 5 Section 338.2278, F.S. created the Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance 6 (M-CORES) Program. The purpose of the program is to revitalize rural communities, encourage job 7 creation, and provide regional connectivity while leveraging technology, enhancing the quality of life 8 and public safety, and protecting the environment and natural resources. 9 The statute directs the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to advance the construction of 10 regional corridors intended to accommodate multiple modes of transportation and multiple types of 11 infrastructure in three defined study areas: 12 • Suncoast Corridor, extending from Citrus County to Jefferson County; 13 • Northern Turnpike Corridor, extending from the northern terminus of the Florida Turnpike 14 northwest to the Suncoast Parkway; and 15 • Southwest-Central Florida Corridor, extending from Collier County to Polk County. 16 The statute specifies these corridors as part of a broader program to address the complete statutory 17 purpose of M-CORES, including revitalizing rural communities and enhancing economic 18 development. The statute also provides FDOT with direction and tools to help advance other regional 19 goals related to the statutory purpose, including enhancing quality of life and protecting the 20 environment. The breadth of the program’s purpose, the scale of the identified corridors, and the 21 additional tools provided to FDOT all point to the need for a thoughtful, collaborative approach to 22 implementing the M-CORES Program, analyzing corridor needs and alternatives, and building 23 consensus around future actions among FDOT and a wide range of partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Federal Regulations GPO Access
    12±2±97 Tuesday Vol. 62 No. 231 December 2, 1997 Pages 63627±63824 Briefings on how to use the Federal Register For information on briefings in Washington, DC, see the announcement on the inside cover of this issue. Now Available Online Code of Federal Regulations via GPO Access (Selected Volumes) Free, easy, online access to selected Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) volumes is now available via GPO Access, a service of the United States Government Printing Office (GPO). CFR titles will be added to GPO Access incrementally throughout calendar years 1996 and 1997 until a complete set is available. GPO is taking steps so that the online and printed versions of the CFR will be released concurrently. The CFR and Federal Register on GPO Access, are the official online editions authorized by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register. New titles and/or volumes will be added to this online service as they become available. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr For additional information on GPO Access products, services and access methods, see page II or contact the GPO Access User Support Team via: ★ Phone: toll-free: 1-888-293-6498 ★ Email: [email protected] federal register 1 II Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 1997 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES PUBLIC Subscriptions: Paper or fiche 202±512±1800 Assistance with public subscriptions 512±1806 General online information 202±512±1530; 1±888±293±6498 FEDERAL REGISTER Published daily, Monday through Friday, (not published on Saturdays, Sundays, or on official holidays), Single copies/back copies: by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Paper or fiche 512±1800 Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Assistance with public single copies 512±1803 Register Act (49 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • HERNANDO/CITRUS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) AGENDA Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 10:00 A.M
    HERNANDO/CITRUS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (TAC) AGENDA Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. The TAC meeting will be conducted via ZOOM webinar. To participate in the meeting, you can join via any computer or smart device at: https://hernandoclerk.zoom.us/w/99049795964?tk=vu1LreNQW6S5S0Lvl- Vxis_nJ9SGzjp5Hg4kEvZJWmc.DQIAAAAXD9PxfBZxcTFwQnJmalNwNnkteFJlREVSR2JRAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA&pwd=dXI0UVJjeURhTDY1VitxeHlURENYZz09&uuid=WN__SkeoHl1Sg21xhNTijkuBg Passcode: TAC102820 Or join by phone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 213 338 8477 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 669 219 2599 or +1 720 928 9299 Webinar ID: 990 4979 5964 International numbers available: https://hernandoclerk.zoom.us/u/astTAmViM AGENDA A CALL TO ORDER 1. Moment of Silence 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Introduction of Committee Members and Staff 4. Declaration of Quorum B APPROVAL/MODIFICATION OF AGENDA (Limited to Board and Staff comment only) C REVIEW/APPROVAL OF MINUTES – 8/26/2020 D CORRESPONDENCE/INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. FDOT FY 2020-2026 Tentative Work Program – Online Hearing 2. MPO Meeting Summary – September 10, 2020 3. Proposed 2021 Meeting Schedule 4. Multi-Use Corridors of Regional Economic Impact Significance (MCORES) Status E ACTION ITEMS 1. Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan Performance Measures F CITIZEN COMMENTS G COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS/UPDATES H MPO STAFF COMMENTS/UPDATES TAC packet page 1 I ADJOURNMENT AND NEXT MEETING – The next meeting of the TAC is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, January 27, 2021, beginning at 10:00 a.m. at Hernando County Building Training Room, 1661 Blaise Drive, Brooksville, FL. The meeting agenda and back-up materials are available online at: www.hernandocounty.us/hernandocitrusmpo.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA October 13, 2017 • 10:00 A.M
    AGENDA October 13, 2017 • 10:00 a.m. MEETING NOTICE Please be advised that the next Central Florida MPO Alliance meeting will be held on: Date: Friday, October 13, 2017 Full agenda packet available for download at www.metroplanorlando.com Time: 10:00 a.m. Location: MetroPlan Orlando David L. Grovdahl Board Room 250 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200 Orlando, Florida 32801 AGENDA Honorable Kathy Meehan, presiding I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Introductions IV. Chairman’s Announcements V. Public Comment on Action Items People wishing to comment on Action Items must complete a “Speakers Introduction Card” at the reception desk. Each speaker is limited to two minutes. VI. Reports Tab 1 a. Delegation Reports (Info only) - Lake-Sumter MPO Report - Polk TPO Report - MetroPlan Orlando Report - Space Coast TPO Report - Ocala/Marion TPO Report - River to Sea TPO Report Central FL MPO Alliance Agenda October 13, 2017 |Page 1 b. FDOT District Reports - District I - District V - Florida’s Turnpike Enterprise VII. Action Items a. Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes TAB 2 Action is requested for approval of the June 16, 2017 Central Florida MPO Alliance meeting minutes. b. Approval of the 2018 Quarterly Meeting Schedule TAB 3 c. Election of 2018 Officers TAB 4 Presenter: Virginia Whittington, MetroPlan Orlando At the last meeting in each calendar year, members of the Central Florida MPO Alliance shall select one of its members as Chairperson, another member as Vice-Chairperson, and a third member as Secretary. These three officers shall serve a term of one year until their successors are selected.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocala, Marion County, Florida
    NPS Form 10-900 | "~, r~~"——'——---OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service MOV 2 \ B9I NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM L J^JLL- ••- This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. ^SeeTTlstructions in 4=&ai.Ja .Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property___________________________________________________ historic name OCALA UNION STATION________________________________________ other names/site number Union Station Plaza/MR2475_________________________________ 2. Location street & number 531 North East First Avenue N/A D not for publication citv or town Qcala ___N/A D vicinity state FLORIDA code FL county Marion code 083 zio code 34470 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this E3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property Bl meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 FLORIDA RAILROADS – SL 237 02.08.20 Page 1 of 23
    1 FLORIDA RAILROADS – SL 237 02.08.20 page 1 of 23 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Florida East Coast (1-7), Seaboard Air Line (8-28), Atlantic Coast Line Rly (30-60), Louisville & Nashville (62-63) and St. Louis-San Francisco (65) & Short Lines (70-105) Based on 1858 Dinsmore Guide (x), Official Guide (G)1875 (y), 1893G (z),Company Public (t), Working (w) TTs & Tariffs ($) as noted, 1976G (e) and current Amtrak TTs (f), j: Miami-Dade County Transit(MDTC)(only shown where on or adjacent [ ] to RR) AG/CG/DG/LG/MG/RG: Appletons/Central States/Dinsmore/Lloyds/Rand McNally/Russells Guides. q: 1884G Former names: [ ] Distances in miles Gauge 4’ 8½” unless noted (date)>(date) start/end of passenger service op. opened; cl. closed; rn. renamed; rl. relocated; tm. terminus of service at date shown; pass?: passenger service? Certain non-passenger locations shown in italics thus: (name) # Histories, z-f = zabcdef etc. FLORIDA EAST COAST RR (FEC) 61.4 East Palatka (3, 4) Based on PTTs 1912 (a), 1925 (b), 1933 (c), 1954 (d) 62. San Mateo Junction (4) k2: current Brightline (BL) stations 61. Rolleston 1887G(tm) 1. JACKSONVILLE – KEY WEST 64.3 Oakside > Jacksonville-St. Augustine: ex Jacksonville St. Augustine & 66.6 Yelvington Halifax River, 3' 0" gauge (1889); Jacksonville St. Augustine & 68.8 Roy Indian River (JAIR); Rolleston-Daytona: ex St. Johns & Halifax 74.1 Dinner Island (1st) ? [Dinner Isle 1890G ] River, 3' 0" gauge (1889). 76.4 Dinner Island (2nd)? * ferry connection from Jacksonville until 1890; mixed trains to 80.3 Neoga (1st)? Quarantine Camp (near St.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation
    INTERCITY GROUND TRANSPORTATION: A FLORIDA CASE STUDY By ANDREW MORRIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2019 © 2019 Andrew Morris To my Grandma, Arlene Delman ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to thank my parents for supporting me through my time at the University of Florida and for pushing me to get a higher education. I also want to thank my grandma, Arlene Delman. She has always been there for me and always makes time to talk. She is one of the reasons why I went back to school. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..........................................................................................................9 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................10 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................11 2 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • M-CORES Report Template
    1 NORTHERN TURNPIKE CONNECTOR 2 TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT 3 November 15, 2020 4 INTRODUCTION 5 6 Section 338.2278 F.S. created the Multi-use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance 7 (M-CORES) program. The purpose of the program is to revitalize rural communities, encourage job 8 creation, and provide regional connectivity while leveraging technology, enhancing the quality of life 9 and public safety, and protecting the environment and natural resources. 10 11 The statute directs the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to advance the construction of 12 regional corridors intended to accommodate multiple modes of transportation and multiple types of 13 infrastructure in three defined study areas: 14 15 • Suncoast Corridor, extending from Citrus County to Jefferson County; 16 • Northern Turnpike Corridor, extending from the northern terminus of the Florida Turnpike 17 northwest to the Suncoast Parkway; and 18 • Southwest-Central Florida Corridor, extending from Collier County to Polk County. 19 20 These corridors are viewed as part of a broader program to address the complete statutory purpose 21 of M-CORES, creating strategic opportunities to revitalize rural communities and enhance economic 22 development. The statute also provides FDOT the direction and tools to help advance other regional 23 goals related to environmental stewardship and quality of life in parallel with corridor development. 24 25 With this broad approach, the intended benefits of M-CORES include addressing issues, such as 26 emergency evacuation and response;
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Marion County Commission Auditorium 601 SE 25Th Avenue, Ocala, FL 34471 October 10, 2017 4:00 PM
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION Marion County Commission Auditorium 601 SE 25th Avenue, Ocala, FL 34471 October 10, 2017 4:00 PM AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PROOF OF PUBLICATION 3. ACTION ITEMS A. PRIORITY PROJECT AMENDMENTS Staff is recommending the addition of the following segments into the Priority and Off-System Priority Project List: • Add CR 484 from Marion Oaks Course to Marion Oaks Pass • Add SW 49th Avenue from Marion Oaks Trail to Marion Oaks Manor. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed amendment. B. CENTRAL FLORIDA MPO ALLIANCE REGIONAL PRIORITIES Each year, the Transportation Planning Organization in coordination with the Central Florida MPO Alliance develops a list of regional priority projects for a five year planning horizon. Staff will present the FY 2022 Priority Projects. Staff is requesting review, ranking, and approval of the priority projects list. C. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AMENDMENT FDOT is recommending an amendment to the TIP in order to add additional funding for County Road 484 Interchange regarding Right-of-Way services and acquisitions. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed amendment. 4. PRESENTATIONS A. CENTRAL FLORIDA MOBILITY WEEK Staff will present the planned activities regarding The 2nd Annual FDOT District V Mobility Week scheduled from October 28th to November 3rd. 5. CONSENT AGENDA A. MINUTES – AUGUST 29, 2017 B. TRAVEL FORM 6. COMMENTS BY FDOT A. Work Program Public Hearing 7. COMMENTS BY TPO STAFF 8. COMMENTS BY TPO MEMBERS 9. PUBLIC COMMENT (Limited to 5 minutes) 10. ADJOURNMENT If reasonable accommodations are needed for you to participate in this meeting, please call the TPO Office at (352) 629-8297 forty-eight (48) hours in advance so arrangements can be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Wi Batteries
    ';aii;i"k .r - - r. - . 'qCjALA, EVENING OTAiiATUBDAY, MAT 7. 1M1 OCALA DISTRICT CONFERENCE UNCLASSIFIED !' QCALA OCCURRENCES There will be held here the 3 at ADVERTISEIENTS Methodist church. May 10, 11 and 12 We Solicit I! If you have any society items for the Ocala district conference. This V ANTED, LOST. 'OUND. FOR SALE. FOR RENT AND SIM- the Star, please call fire-on-e. conference represents the Methodist - - Your . ILAR LOCAL church's work in the territory extend NEEDS Miss Nellie Stevens will leave next ing from Ocala to St. Petersburg, in Rstes: Six lines, maximum, one time, week for Bartow, where she goes in cluding twenty-tw-o pastoral charges . Cleaning 25c; three times. 50c; six times, 75c; the interest of child welfare work. or 64 churches. Rev. W. P. Buhnnan, one month. $3. Payable in advance. who makes his home here, is the pre end TheRoad Keep the hands and face soft with siding elder. BOARDERS WANTED At 704 N. Magnolia street; $8 per week. Mrs. ILASOL. 50 cents the bottle at Rev. C W. White, pastor of ths Pressing 2-- to quickProfits Gerig's Drug Store. ? Methodist church, is the host. He and J. E. Stilley. &t his committee on entertainment are WANTED An experienced business We have opened a cleaning Purina System is Mr. and Mrs. Frank Broderick and preparing to take care of the 125 peo- woman wishes position summer THE and pressing department in for to make chicks grow TJ.-- y- family have moved . from Sanchez ple expected preachers, delegates and longer; 1 Men's or typewriting, cashier or twice a3 fact, during the first street to the Meadows cottage at 713 visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Residential Market Potential for Ocala
    AN ANALYSIS of RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL for The Downtown Ocala Study Area The City of Ocala, Marion County, Florida August, 2017 Conducted by On Behalf of the ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF OCALA rd nd P.O. Box 4907 201 SE 3 Street, 2 Floor Clinton, New Jersey 08809 Ocala, Florida 34471 ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Post Office Box 4907 Clinton, New Jersey 08809 908 735-6336 [email protected] • www.ZVA.cc Research & Strategic Analysis STUDY CONTENTS An Analysis of Residential Market Potential: The Downtown Ocala Study Area 1 Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 Study Area Map 4 City-Wide Annual Market Potential 6 Annual Market Potential for the Downtown Ocala Study Area 8 Target Market Analysis 11 The Current Context 15 Multi-Family Rental Properties 15 Multi-Family and Single-Family Attached For-Sale Properties 17 Optimum Market Position 19 Multi-Family For-Rent Distribution By Rent Range 20 Multi-Family For-Sale Distribution By Price Range 21 Single-Family Attached For-Sale Distribution By Price Range 22 Optimum Market Position: The Downtown Ocala Study Area 25 Downtown Development Opportunities 28 Market Capture 30 Building and Unit Amenities 33 Downtown Housing Types 36 Supporting Tables 39 Table 1: Annual Market Potential Table 2: Annual Market Potential By Lifestage And Household Type Table 3: Summary Of Selected Multi-Family Rental Properties Table 4: Summary Of Selected For-Sale Multi-Family And Single-Family Attached Developments Table 5: Target Groups For New Multi-Family For-Rent Table 6: Target Groups For New Multi-Family For-Sale Table 7: Target Groups For New Single-Family Attached For-Sale Table 8: Optimum Market Position: 530 to 655 New Dwelling Units, Assumptions and Limitations Copyright o ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC.
    [Show full text]