Senate the Senate Met at 9 A.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Senate the Senate Met at 9 A.M E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 152 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JUNE 7, 2006 No. 71 Senate The Senate met at 9 a.m. and was Senator from the State of Kansas, to per- When we return at noon, we have set called to order by the Honorable SAM form the duties of the Chair. aside debate times on two issues. First, BROWNBACK, a Senator from the State TED STEVENS, from 12 o’clock to 3 o’clock, we will be of Kansas. President pro tempore. debating the motion to proceed to the Mr. BROWNBACK thereupon as- repeal of the death tax. A cloture mo- PRAYER sumed the chair as Acting President tion was filed on proceeding to the The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- pro tempore. death tax repeal. That vote will occur fered the following prayer: f tomorrow morning. We have also set Let us pray. RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME aside debate from 3 o’clock to 6 o’clock Great Shepherd of us all, remind us on the motion to proceed to the Native The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- that You will not permit us to be test- Hawaiians measure. The cloture vote pore. Under the previous order, the ed beyond our strength. Inspire us in will occur on that motion to proceed leadership time is reserved. the face of great challenges by the fact during tomorrow’s session, as well. that You have weighed the difficulties f I add that this week we have other and will give us the power to meet MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMEND- matters to consider, including some them. Make us grateful for the oppor- MENT—MOTION TO PROCEED nominations. We hope to reach agree- ments to consider Sue Schwab to be tunities to express our love for You by The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- U.S. Trade Representative, the Assist- cheerfully bearing our crosses. pore. Under the previous order, the ant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety Strengthen our Senators. Do not re- Senate will resume consideration of and Health, and several available dis- move their mountains, but give them the motion to proceed to S.J. Res. 1, trict judges who are on the Executive the energy to climb them. Lead them which the clerk will report. Calendar. We will be scheduling those around life’s stumbling blocks to a des- The bill clerk read as follows: tination that brings glory to You. for consideration through the remain- Motion to proceed to the consideration of ing days this week. We pray in Your powerful Name. S.J. Res. 1, proposing an amendment to the RECOGNITION OF THE MINORITY LEADER Amen. Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- f The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- pore. The Democratic leader is recog- nized. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE pore. Under the previous order, the time until 9:40 shall be equally divided VOTING The Honorable SAM BROWNBACK led between the two leaders or their des- Mr. REID. Mr. President, my only re- the Pledge of Allegiance, as follows: ignees. sponse would be on this side of the I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the aisle, we will be voting on the estate RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER United States of America, and to the Repub- tax. lic for which it stands, one nation under God, The majority leader is recognized. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. SCHEDULE pore. The Senator from Wisconsin is Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, this morn- f recognized. ing we will have a brief period for clos- Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, we APPOINTMENT OF ACTING ing remarks prior to the 10 a.m. vote will shortly be voting on what will pre- PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE on the Marriage Protection Amend- sumably be the 28th amendment to the ment. That vote will be on a vote for U.S. Constitution. We all know the The PRESIDING OFFICER. The cloture on the motion to proceed to outcome of that vote. The amendment clerk will please read a communication S.J. Res. 1. will fall well short of the 60 votes re- to the Senate from the President pro Following the 10 o’clock vote, the quired for cloture, let alone the 67 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). Senate will recess in order to attend a votes required to pass a constitutional The legislative clerk read the fol- joint meeting with the House for the amendment, so it will fail, as it did 2 lowing letter: President of the Republic of Latvia, years ago. I am pleased that the Senate U.S. SENATE, who will be addressing both Houses at will reject this amendment. PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, 11 o’clock this morning. Senators I am heartened so many Senators Washington, DC, June 7, 2006. To the Senate: should remain in the Chamber fol- have come to the Senate to speak out Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, lowing the vote so we may leave at ap- strongly against this misguided pro- of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby proximately 10:40 for that joint meet- posal, but I am saddened that once appoint the Honorable SAM BROWNBACK, a ing. again the Senate has spent several ∑ This ‘‘bullet’’ symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S5517 . VerDate Aug 31 2005 00:34 Jun 08, 2006 Jkt 049060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A07JN6.000 S07JNPT1 hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMSENATE S5518 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE June 7, 2006 days on such a divisive and unneeded Gay Americans are our neighbors, at it by a different route, it says it has proposal, a proposal that pits Ameri- our friends, our family members, and to go through the legislature. It can’t cans against one another. I think it ap- our colleagues. Millions are loving par- be forced by the court. What is wrong peals to people’s worst instincts and ents in strong and healthy families. with that? prejudices. Let’s not demonize them. Let’s not I find it a sad prospect that we might The arguments made by supporters of play upon fears. Let’s not use them as not be able to pass this 90 to 10. Mar- the amendment simply do not hold up scapegoats for perceived social prob- riage is a foundational institution. It is under scrutiny. Supporters argue that lems. Let’s allow—in fact, let’s encour- under attack by the courts. It needs to Federal courts are basically on the age—States to extend rights and re- be defended in this way by defining it brink of recognizing same-sex marriage sponsibilities to these decent, loving, as the union of a man and a woman as and that States may be forced to recog- law-abiding families. We can start 45 of our 50 States have done. If it is nize same-sex marriage performed in today by rejecting this unnecessary, going to be defined otherwise, it must other States. Of course, neither of mean-spirited and poorly drafted con- be done by the legislatures and not by these things have happened, and no one stitutional amendment. the courts. has explained why we should do a pre- I yield the floor and suggest the ab- This morning we are going to vote on emptive strike on the basic governing sence of a quorum. a constitutional amendment to define document of the country to address a The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- marriage as the union of a man and a hypothetical future court decision. pore. The clerk will call the roll. woman. This is about who is going to Supporters talk about traditional The bill clerk proceeded to call the determine the definition, whether it is marriage but in some ways have very roll. the courts or the legislative bodies. little respect for the traditional role of Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, I ask The amendment is about how we are the States in regulating marriage. If unanimous consent that the order for going to raise the next generation. How they did, they would not be trying to the quorum call be rescinded. are they going to be raised? It is a fun- impose a restrictive Federal definition ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. damental issue for our families and for of marriage on all States for all time. Without objection, it is so ordered. our future. It is an issue for the people. The supporters argue that this amend- Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, I ask It is not an issue that the courts should ment will not effect the ability of the time during the quorum call be resolve. Those of us who support this State legislatures to extend benefits to equally divided on both sides. amendment are doing so in an effort to same-sex couples or enact civil unions, The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- let the people decide. but as I tried to point out in some pore. Without objection, it is so or- There has been a lot of eloquent de- depth yesterday, even the legal experts dered. bate about this constitutional amend- who would support this constitutional Mr. FEINGOLD. I suggest the ab- ment. I have been on the Senate floor amendment cannot even agree about sence of a quorum. most of the time. I have heard very lit- The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tem- its potential effect and scope.
Recommended publications
  • The Color Line in Ohio Public Schools, 1829-1890
    THE COLOR LINE IN OHIO PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 1829-1890 DISSERTATION Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By LEONARD ERNEST ERICKSON, B. A., M. A, ****** The Ohio State University I359 Approved Adviser College of Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is not the work of the author alone, of course, but represents the contributions of many persons. While it is impossible perhaps to mention every­ one who has helped, certain officials and other persons are especially prominent in my memory for their encouragement and assistance during the course of my research. I would like to express my appreciation for the aid I have received from the clerks of the school boards at Columbus, Dayton, Toledo, and Warren, and from the Superintendent of Schools at Athens. In a similar manner I am indebted for the courtesies extended to me by the librarians at the Western Reserve Historical Society, the Ohio State Library, the Ohio Supreme Court Library, Wilberforce University, and Drake University. I am especially grateful to certain librarians for the patience and literally hours of service, even beyond the high level customary in that profession. They are Mr. Russell Dozer of the Ohio State University; Mrs. Alice P. Hook of the Historical and Philosophical Society; and Mrs. Elizabeth R. Martin, Miss Prances Goudy, Mrs, Marion Bates, and Mr. George Kirk of the Ohio Historical Society. ii Ill Much of the time for the research Involved In this study was made possible by a very generous fellowship granted for the year 1956 -1 9 5 7, for which I am Indebted to the Graduate School of the Ohio State University.
    [Show full text]
  • RFID Implant Law Hidden in Obamacare Calls for Implementation by March 2013 | Alternative News Report
    AtlernatvieN ewsR eport Spirit Led Citizen Journalism | Blacklisted News & Video | Suppressed Astronomy | Earth Changes | 2012 | HAARP & Chemtrail Reports | Spirituality | Preparedness | Everything They Don't Want You To Know HOME 100% READER SUPPORTED: SHOP AT OUR STORE! 200 MOST RECENT POSTS A WORLD IN TURMOIL ABOUT ALTERNATIVE NEWS REPORT DAILY ONLINE NEWS SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE NEWS REPORT VIDEO FEED AUTHORED BY COMET ELENIN’S PASSING EXACTLY WHO & WHAT IS ILLUMICORP? HAARP HUMAN RFID CHIPS = 666 MAKE BARACK OBAMA A ONE TERM PRESIDENT MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD COVERTLY ESTABLISHING SHARIA LAW IN AMERICA NEW! ALTERNATIVE NEWS REPORT DAILY ONLINE NEWSPAPER POLE SHIFT WARNING SIGNS PREPAREDNESS THE HORRIBLE TRUTH ABOUT OBAMACARE AND WHY IT MUST BE REPEALED US MILITARY PSY OPS IN AMERICAN MEDIA RECOMMENDED READING FOR ← What Does Islam Say About the “Meltdown At Three Mile Island” TYPE ANY WORD OR WINTER 2012: Signs of the Rise of the Six Part Video Documentary of the PHRASE: Imam Mahdi? Worst Nuclear Accident in Legacy of Ashes: The History Search of the CIA By Tim Weiner U.S. History → Shop for Cutlery, Confessions of An Economic RFID Implant Law Hidden in Obamacare Outdoor Hunting Hit Man By John Perkins Calls For Implementation By March 2013 Knives, Camping Gear Posted on March 29, 2011 by CK Hunter | 5 Comments BREAK FREE: KILL YOUR TV SET. Copyright 2011-3011 GET PLUGGED IN! SUBSCRIBE Alternative News Forum, All TO THE FASTEST GROWING Rights Reserved. ALTERNATIVE NEWS BLOG ON THE PLANET: ALTERNATIVE There are presently at NEWS REPORT least 64 articles and reports on Alternative News Forum pertaining Stop the IQ drain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Breadth of Congress' Authority to Access Information in Our Scheme
    H H H H H H H H H H H 5. The Breadth of Congress’s Authority to Access Information in Our Scheme of Separated Powers Overview Congress’s broad investigatory powers are constrained both by the structural limitations imposed by our constitutional system of separated and balanced powers and by the individual rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Thus, the president, subordinate officials, and individuals called as witnesses can assert various privileges, which enable them to resist or limit the scope of congressional inquiries. These privileges, however, are also limited. The Supreme Court has recognized the president’s constitutionally based privilege to protect the confidentiality of documents or other information that reflects presidential decision-making and deliberations. This presidential executive privilege, however, is qualified. Congress and other appropriate investigative entities may overcome the privilege by a sufficient showing of need and the inability to obtain the information elsewhere. Moreover, neither the Constitution nor the courts have provided a special exemption protecting the confidentiality of national security or foreign affairs information. But self-imposed congressional constraints on information access in these sensitive areas have raised serious institutional and practical concerns as to the current effectiveness of oversight of executive actions in these areas. With regard to individual rights, the Supreme Court has recognized that individuals subject to congressional inquiries are protected by the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, though in many important respects those rights may be qualified by Congress’s constitutionally rooted investigatory authority. A. Executive Privilege Executive privilege is a doctrine that enables the president to withhold certain information from disclosure to the public or even Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • N Ieman Reports
    NIEMAN REPORTS Nieman Reports One Francis Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman Reports THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 21 ST CENTURY MUCKRAKERS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION HARVARDAT UNIVERSITY 21st Century Muckrakers Who Are They? How Do They Do Their Work? Words & Reflections: Secrets, Sources and Silencing Watchdogs Journalism 2.0 End Note went to the Carnegie Endowment in New York but of the Oakland Tribune, and Maynard was throw- found times to return to Cambridge—like many, ing out questions fast and furiously about my civil I had “withdrawal symptoms” after my Harvard rights coverage. I realized my interview was lasting ‘to promote and elevate the year—and would meet with Tenney. She came to longer than most, and I wondered, “Is he trying to my wedding in Toronto in 1984, and we tried to knock me out of competition?” Then I happened to keep in touch regularly. Several of our class, Peggy glance over at Tenney and got the only smile from standards of journalism’ Simpson, Peggy Engel, Kat Harting, and Nancy the group—and a warm, welcoming one it was. I Day visited Tenney in her assisted living facility felt calmer. Finally, when the interview ended, I in Cambridge some years ago, during a Nieman am happy to say, Maynard leaped out of his chair reunion. She cared little about her own problems and hugged me. Agnes Wahl Nieman and was always interested in others. Curator Jim Tenney was a unique woman, and I thoroughly Thomson was the public and intellectual face of enjoyed her friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Irreversible Error
    Copyright © 2014 by The Constitution Project. All rights reserved. No part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of The Constitution Project. For other information about this report, or any other work of The Constitution Project, please visit our website at www.constitutionproject.org or email us at [email protected]. Cover art designed by Elias Moose THE CONSTITUTION PROJECT STAFF Larry Akey Scott Roehm Director of Communications Senior Counsel, Rule of Law Program Maria Cortina Hispanic Outreach Fellow Virginia E. Sloan President Jennifer Donley Development Coordinator Katherine Stern Senior Counsel, Christopher Durocher Rule of Law Program Government Affairs Counsel Sarah E. Turberville Louis Fisher Senior Counsel, Scholar in Residence Criminal Justice Program Kayla Haran Stephen I. Vladeck Program Assistant Supreme Court Fellow Sarah McLean Brian Yourish Communications Coordinator Office Manager I. Scott Messinger Chief Operating Officer The Constitution Project promotes constitutional rights and values by forging a non-ideological consensus aimed at sound legal interpretations and policy solutions. The Constitution Project | iii Irreversible Error iv | The Constitution Project TABLE OF CONTENTS The Death Penalty Committee .......................................................................... vii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • When Congress Comes Calling: a Study on the Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics of Legislative Inquiry When Congress
    When Congress Comes Calling: A Study on the Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics of Legislative Inquiry of Legislative on the Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics A Study When Congress 1200 18th Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20036 Comes Calling 202.580.6920 Email: [email protected] A Study on the www.constitutionproject.org Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics of Legislative Inquiry Morton Rosenberg Constitution Project Fellow WHEN CONGRESS COMES CALLING: A Study on the Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics of Legislative Inquiry © 2017 The Constitution Project All Rights Reserved. Requests for permission to reproduce selections from this book should be sent to: The Constitution Project, 1200 18th Street NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20036; or by e-mail to [email protected] The Constitution Project’s mission is to safeguard constitutional rights and values when they are threatened by our government’s criminal justice and national security practices, and to strengthen our system of checks and balances. The views expressed in this study do not necessarily reflect the views of individual members of The Constitution Project’s Board of Directors. For information about this report, or any other work of The Constitution Project, please visit our website at www.constitutionproject.org or e-mail us at [email protected]. Book design by Keane Design & Communications, Inc., keanedesign.com. Contents Preface Part I: Principles, Practices and Pragmatics of Legislative Inquiry Chapter 1 – Introduction: Updating the Study of Legislative Inquiry and Adapting it to the Changed Climate of Congressional Oversight ............................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 – The Institutional Framework of Congressional Oversight: Purposes, Powers, Limitations and Practicalities ................................................................................................... 5 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    Nos. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, 14-574 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Respondents. ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE KENNETH B. MEHLMAN ET AL. SUPPORTING PETITIONERS SEAN R. GALLAGHER REGINALD J. BROWN STACY A. CARPENTER SETH P. WAXMAN BENNETT L. COHEN Counsel of Record POLSINELLI PC PAUL R.Q. WOLFSON 1515 Wynkoop Street DINA B. MISHRA Suite 600 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING Denver, CO 80202 HALE AND DORR LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6000 [email protected] ADDITIONAL CAPTIONS AND COUNSEL LISTED ON INSIDE COVER BRITTANI HENRY, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, et al., Respondents. VALERIA TANCO, et al., Petitioners, v. WILLIAM EDWARD “BILL” HASLAM, et al., Respondents. APRIL DEBOER, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD SNYDER, et al., Respondents. GREGORY BOURKE, et al., Petitioners, v. STEVE BESHEAR, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS GOVERNOR OF KENTUCKY, Respondent. MARK C. FLEMING FELICIA H. ELLSWORTH ELISABETH M. OPPENHEIMER ALLISON TRZOP WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 ALAN E. SCHOENFELD WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................... 1 ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 6 I. EQUAL ACCESS TO CIVIL MARRIAGE PRO- MOTES THE CONSERVATIVE VALUES OF STABILITY, MUTUAL SUPPORT, AND MU- TUAL OBLIGATION .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    00-Fisher-PWP3(i-xviii)_00-Fisher-PWP3 7/5/13 1:26 PM Page vii © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. CONTENTS Preface xiii Note on Citations xix 1 The Constitutional Framework 1 The British Models 1 Opposing Monarchical Powers 3 Associated War Powers 6 Repelling Sudden Attacks 8 Separating Purse and Sword 11 Commander in Chief 12 Scholarly Analysis 14 2 Precedents from 1789 to 1900 17 Indian Wars 17 President as “Sole Organ” 20 The Whiskey Rebellion 22 Quasi-War with France 23 Neutrality Act Prosecutions 26 The “Little Sarah” Incident 31 Barbary Wars 32 The War of 1812 37 The Mexican War 38 Bombarding Greytown 44 The Civil War 47 Spanish-American War 51 3 America Steps Out: 1900–1945 55 Protecting Life and Property 56 President Wilson’s Forays 60 00-Fisher-PWP3(i-xviii)_00-Fisher-PWP3 7/5/13 1:26 PM Page viii © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. viii CONTENTS Intervention in Nicaragua 63 World War I 65 The Curtiss-Wright Case 68 Legislative Constraints in the 1930s 72 World War II 74 4 The UN Charter and Korea 80 The League of Nations 80 Creating the UN Charter 83 The UN Participation Act 90 Vandenberg Resolution 94 The Korean War 95 Political Repercussions 99 5 Taking Stock: 1951–1964 104 Mutual Security Treaties 104 NATO’s Legislative History 106 The “Great Debate” in 1951 110 The Steel Seizure Case 114 Eisenhower’s Philosophy 116 Area Resolutions 117 Kennedy Reasserts Executive Power 124 6 Vietnam and the War Powers Resolution 127 Gulf of Tonkin Resolution 128 Was There a Second Attack? 131 Escalation of the War 132 Free World Forces 135 National Commitments Resolution of 1969 137 Disputes in the Courts 139 The War Powers Resolution 144 Analyzing the WPR 148 Efforts to Amend the WPR 150 00-Fisher-PWP3(i-xviii)_00-Fisher-PWP3 7/5/13 1:26 PM Page ix © University Press of Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • TOPLINE Broad Story Topic (January 1 – November 1, 2007) Top 10 Stories
    TOPLINE Broad Story Topic (January 1 – November 1, 2007) Topic % of newshole Daily Show Mainstream Press1 US Foreign Affairs 16.5% 18.5% Elections/ Politics 15.8 11.6 Government 14.6 6.8 Lifestyle 9.2 3.3 Press/ Media 8.4 2.7 Foreign (non-U.S.) 4.9 10.7 Celebrity/ Entertainment 4.5 2.1 Race/ Gender/ Gay Issues 3.0 1.2 Crime 2.7 7.6 Science/ Technology 2.6 1.2 Additional Domestic Affairs 2.6 2.5 Environment 2.5 1.6 Sports 2.0 1.8 Religion 1.9 0.7 Health/ Medicine 1.7 4.1 Defense/ Military (Domestic) 1.5 2.6 Immigration 1.1 2.8 Domestic Terrorism 0.8 1.9 Economics 0.7 3.2 Education 0.7 1.0 Business 0.6 3.2 Court/ Legal System 0.6 0.4 Catastrophes/ Disasters 0.4 5.1 US Miscellaneous 0.3 2.7 Transportation 0.2 0.7 Development/ Sprawl 0.1 0.2 Total2 99.9 100.2 Top 10 Stories (January 1 – November 1, 2007) Rank Story % of newshole Daily Show Mainstream Press 1 2008 Campaign 14.6% 8.8% 2 Debate over Iraq Policy 10.7 8.9 3 Events in Iraq 3.4 6.3 4 Fired U.S. Attorneys 3.3 1.8 5 Global Warming 2.2 1.1 6 Immigration 1.9 3.1 7 Domestic Terrorism 1.6 1.8 8 CIA Leak Investigation 1.5 1.2 9 Vice President Cheney Controversies 1.2 0.1 10 Iran 1.2 2.5 1 Mainstream press refers to 48 media outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • BC-1989-12-25.Pdf
    The Fifth Fstate R A D I O T I E L E V S I O N C A B L E S A T E L L I T E Broadcasting ii Dec25 aft-- (.en-t/c4eer fd Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. KSTP-TV KOB-TV WTOG TV WDIO-TV KSAX-TV KOBR-TV KOBF-TV KS95-FM KSTP-AM CONUS USSB F&F PRODUCTIONS VSEP ZIT9£ -IV 113MXVll 04I 9016 ZZ i W602i s dS-10V ® $1 Ob/ADIV )IZI qt Zl Z1 19F. 19 £ .11 91 0-£Y-J*,rY Y YY IY**Y9-Y Breathe new life into your over -the -shoulders with an AMPEX 4:2:2 still store. The ESS'" 3 still store provides the highest When it conies to operation, the ESS -3 simplifies quality images available for television. your job with the best cataloging system in the industry, With 13.5MHz, 4:2:2 coding throughout plus lightning -fast playlist building to handle those last the system, the ESS -3 digitizes video minute changes. frames as component signals, giving you And to top off this field- proven still store, now video quality that's far superior to composite systems. there's an optical disk that will give you off -line storage It's the quality you need for today's sharp, new look! for about 20 cents an image! But we didn't stop there. The ESS -3 also gives For information on this you on- the -fly paste -up of stills -the artist can reduce inexpensive digital still store, X and Y image dimensions independently, feather image call 1- 800- 25AMPEX.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief for Respondent International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 760 in Support of the Petitioner National Labor Relations Board
    76??? Noel Canning Brief:68903 9/12/13 4:34 PM Page cov-1 No. 12-1281 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , Petitioner, v. NOEL CANNING , A D IVISION OF THE NOEL CORP ., and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS , L OCAL 760, Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 760 IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITIONER NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD BRADLEY T. R AYMOND 25 Louisiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Of counsel: JAMES B. C OPPESS (Counsel of Record) LAURENCE GOLD 815 Sixteenth Street, N.W. 805 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 637-5337 Peake DeLancey Printers, LLC - (301) 341-4600 - Cheverly MD 76??? Noel Canning Brief:68903 9/12/13 4:34 PM Page cov-2 76??? Noel Canning Brief:68903 9/12/13 4:34 PM Page i i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................... ii STATEMENT ..................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................ 4 ARGUMENT ....................................................... 5 I. THE RECESS APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE GRANTS THE PRESIDENT THE POWER TO FILL VACANCIES DURING INTRASESSION RECESSES OF THE SENATE .................................... 5 II. THE PRESIDENT HAS THE POWER TO FILL UP ALL VACANCIES DURING THE RECESS OF THE SENATE, REGARDLESS OF WHEN THOSE VACANCIES FIRST AROSE .... 18 III. UNDER THE PRESIDENT AND SENATE’S INTERPRETATION OF THE RECESS APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE, THE SENATE WAS IN RECESS ON JANUARY 4, 2012 ............. 22 CONCLUSION ................................................... 29 76??? Noel Canning Brief:68903 9/12/13 4:34 PM Page ii ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Page Evans v.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Conviction Dna Testing: When Is Justice Served?
    S. HRG. 106–1061 POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING: WHEN IS JUSTICE SERVED? HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 13, 2000 Serial No. J–106–88 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 74–753 WASHINGTON : 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:39 Oct 05, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DISC\74753.XXX ATX007 PsN: ATX007 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman STROM THURMOND, South Carolina PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JON KYL, Arizona HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE DEWINE, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California JOHN ASHCROFT, Missouri RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York BOB SMITH, New Hampshire MANUS COONEY, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Minority Chief Counsel (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 08:39 Oct 05, 2001 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DISC\74753.XXX ATX007 PsN: ATX007 C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Biden, Hon. Joseph R., Jr., a U.S. Senator from the State of Delaware ............. 68 DeWine, Hon.
    [Show full text]