Namibia in 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Namibia in 2004 Namibia in 2004 As a result of the parliamentary, presidential and regional elections, the South West African Peoples’ Organisation (SWAPO) of Namibia further consolidated its domi nance. The nomination of SWAPO’s presidential candidate – succeeding the country’s first head of state and president of the former liberation movement since its foun- dation in 1960 – resulted in fierce intra-party competition and the sidelining of longstanding political office bearers. The land issue became further politicised and initiatives to expropriate land con- tributed to growing insecurity among commercial farmers. Overall macroeconomic performance suffered through export losses due to the strong currency. Public expenditure came under pressure as debts accumulated further, and state finances face a critical degree of constraint. Domestic Politics The biggest shifts in the domestic political power structure – maybe since independence in 1990 – took place as a prelude to this year’s parliamentary and presidential elections. Due to internal party opposition, Namibia’s head of state Sam Nujoma – along with Robert Mugabe, the only remaining independence-era president still in office – decided against pursuing a fourth term. He suggested Hifikepunye Pohamba, the party’s vice-president and his closest confidante, to the central committee as his successor. The commit- tee met on 2 and 3 April to prepare submissions to an extraordinary SWAPO congress on the presidential candidate, but denied Pohamba the status of sole candidate and nominated three potential succes- sors. Delegates to the extraordinary SWAPO congress, held from 28 to 30 May, were tasked with making a final choice. During the © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi ��.��63/97890043��57�_003 26 Namibia in 2004 internal campaign, the factional fights revealed disunity to an extent hitherto unseen. Nujoma used his executive powers as head of state to dismiss Foreign Minister Hidipo Hamutenya, Pohamba’s strongest con- tender and rival, from his cabinet post on 25 May, just ahead of the congress. Hamutenya’s deputy, Kaire Mbuende (former SADC execu- tive secretary), considered a supporter of his minister, also had to vacate office with immediate effect. Notwithstanding such drastic harassment, almost one-third of the more than 500 congress dele- gates voted for Hamutenya in the first round, which, however, failed to produce a candidate with an absolute majority. Snatching all but one vote from the third candidate, Nahas Angula, minister of higher education and employment creation (allegedly a “fall-back candi- date” for Nujoma in case his favourite did not make it), Pohamba finally emerged as clear winner. The result of the subsequent electoral convention held by the party’s central committee from 1 to 3 October was the rigorous implementation of the Nujoma line and the strict exclusion of the so-called Hamutenya camp from the party’s medium-term political future. The number of votes candidates received decided their rank- ing on the party list, which was headed by 12 candidates nominated by the president. The party held 55 of 72 parliamentary seats, having won 75% of all votes in the 1999 elections. Hamutenya ended in the 57th position – an obvious indication that he would be prevented from returning as a legislator and cabinet member (ministers have to be members of parliament). The same fate befell those consid- ered to be his supporters, including several ministers as well as the speaker of parliament. They were ranked even lower on the list. The minister of agriculture, another of the victims, drew his own conclusions and tendered his resignation on 7 December. Seemingly with the blessing of Nujoma, former Prime Minister Hage Geingob made his return to Namibian politics. Ousted from office by the president halfway through the third legislature, Geingob had joined a World Bank agency for Africa in Washington DC. He attended the .
Recommended publications
  • Namibia's Child Welfare Regime, 1990-2017
    CENTRE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH Namibia’s Child Welfare Regime, 1990-2017 Isaac Chinyoka CSSR Working Paper No. 431 February 2019 Published by the Centre for Social Science Research University of Cape Town 2019 http://www.cssr.uct.ac.za This Working Paper can be downloaded from: http://cssr.uct.ac.za/pub/wp/431 ISBN: 978-1-77011-418-0 © Centre for Social Science Research, UCT, 2019 About the author: Dr Isaac Chinyoka completed his PhD at the University of Cape Town in 2018. His PhD, supervised by Jeremy Seekings, examined child welfare regimes in four Southern African countries: South Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Zimbabwe. His PhD research was funded primarily by UKAid through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council, grant ES/J018058/1 to Jeremy Seekings, for the “Legislating and Implementing Welfare Policy Reforms” research project. Namibia’s Child Welfare Regime, 1990-2017 Abstract Most countries in Southern Africa are similar in providing some form of cash transfers to families with children, primarily to reduce child poverty, but there are striking variations in the categories of children targeted and the reach of social grants. Namibia adopted South Africa-like child grants during South Africa rule. Namibia’s child welfare regime, like most other regimes in Southern Africa, started with and maintained a strongly familial child welfare regime (CWR), focused on children living in families with only one or no parents present. Whereas South Africa, after its transition to democracy, introduced a Child Support Grant (CSG) - that expanded massively the reach of child grants - Namibia did not do likewise.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia:Unfinished Business Within the Ruling Part
    Focus on Namibia Namibia: Unfinished business within the ruling party There is a new president at the helm, but the jostling for position within the ruling Swapo party, which started in 2004, has not ended. Would the adversaries’ long-held dream that the strongest and most viable opposition in Namibia emerges from within the ranks of Swapo itself, come true? Axaro Gurirab reports from Windhoek. “Can you believe it: the sun is still significant and gallant contribution to the These questions are relevant because rising in the East and setting in the West!” So democratisation of Africa. during the week leading up to the May 2004 exclaimed a colleague of mine on the occasion The political transition had seen a heated extraordinary congress, Nujoma fired of the inauguration of President Hifikepunye contest between three Swapo heavyweights, Hamutenya as foreign minister, as well as the Pohamba on 21 March 2005. This simple namely Swapo vice-president Hifikepunye then deputy foreign minister, Kaire Mbuende. observation was quite profound because until Pohamba, current prime minister Nahas Angula, It was thought at the time that Nujoma, who then many people had been at their wits’ end and former foreign affairs minister Hidipo was personally campaigning for Pohamba, took trying to imagine Namibia without Sam Nujoma, Hamutenya. these drastic steps in order to send a strong the president of the ruling Swapo party. At the extraordinary party congress in May message to the congress delegates about who He had been the country’s first president, 2004, Angula fell out in the first round, and he liked and did not like.
    [Show full text]
  • Swapo and the Churches: an International Scandal
    SWAPO AND THE CHURCHES: AN INTERNATIONAL SCANDAL Paul Trewhela 'Swapo has the right to protect her people from those who are collaborating with the enemy...Yours in Jesus Christ.' — Dr Abisai Shejavali, General Secretary of the Council of Churches in Namibia. The illegal occupation of Namibia has been facilitated by Namibians who have collaborated with South Africa and have been traitors to the cause of a free Namibia. Yet SWAPO is willing to accommodate these people in a free Namibia and forgive their misguided behaviour.' — Report of the World Council of Churches, May 1988. 'So it goes' — Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughterhouse-Five. The Problems of the Text On 14 November 1989, Pluto Press published Church and Liberation in Namibia (CALIN), edited by Peter Katjavivi, Per Frostin and Kaire Mbuende. The book contains a number of documents on the relation between the churches and political conditions in Namibia, from 1958 to 1988, with individual essays by each of the editors and three others. David Theo Goldberg, assistant professor at the School of Justice Studies at Arizona State University, has described the book as 'crucial for anyone wanting to com­ prehend the role of the church in the promotion and realization of Namibian independence'. (Southern African Review of Books, Jan/Febl991) Goldberg's review is characteristic of the ignorance combined with tunnel vision of the international liberal/left establishment relating to southern Africa. The book in fact makes it impossible to comprehend the role of the churches in one of the most important episodes in the recent history of southern Africa: the cycle of wholesale arrests, torture, imprisonment and murder of Swapo members on the orders of their own leaders, dating from at least 1976 until the release of survivors in May 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia and Angola: Analysis of a Symbiotic Relationship Hidipo Hamutenya*
    Namibia and Angola: Analysis of a symbiotic relationship Hidipo Hamutenya* Introduction Namibia and Angola have much in common, but, at the same time, they differ greatly. For example, both countries fought colonial oppression and are now independent; however, one went through civil war, while the other had no such experience. Other similarities include the fact that the former military groups (Angola’s Movimiento Popular para la Liberacão de Angola, or MPLA, and Namibia’s South West Africa People’s Organisation, or SWAPO) are now in power in both countries. At one time, the two political movements shared a common ideological platform and lent each other support during their respective liberation struggles. The two countries are also neighbours, with a 1,376-km common border that extends from the Atlantic Ocean in the east to the Zambezi River in the west. Families and communities on both sides of the international boundary share resources, communicate, trade and engage in other types of exchange. All these facts point to a relationship between the two countries that goes back many decades, and continues strongly today. What defines this relationship and what are the crucial elements that keep it going? Angola lies on the Atlantic coast of south-western Africa. It is richly endowed with natural resources and measures approximately 1,246,700 km2 in land surface area. Populated with more than 14 million people, Angola was a former Portuguese colony. Portuguese explorers first came to Angola in 1483. Their conquest and exploitation became concrete when Paulo Dias de Novais erected a colonial settlement in Luanda in 1575.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipumbu Shiimi: Namibia's New Generation of Banknotes
    Ipumbu Shiimi: Namibia’s new generation of banknotes Remarks by Mr Ipumbu Shiimi, Governor of the Bank of Namibia, at the official launch of the new banknotes during the 22nd Independence Anniversary celebrations, Mariental, Hardap Region, 21 March 2012. * * * Directors of Ceremony Your Excellency Dr Hifikepunye Pohamba, President of the Republic of Namibia and First Lady Meme Pohamba Right Honourable Prime Minister, Nahas Angula Honourable Speaker of the National Assembly, Dr. Theo Ben Gurirab Honourable Chairperson of the National Council, Asser Kapere Honourable Chief Justice, Judge Peter Shivute Honourable Ministers Honourable Members of Parliament Members of the Diplomatic Corps Honourable Katrina Hanse-Himarwa, Governor of the Hardap Region and other Governors from other regions Your Worship, Alex Kamburute, Mayor of Mariental and other Mayors from other local authorities Local and Regional Authority Councillors, Traditional Leaders Senior Government Officials Members of the Media Distinguished Ladies and Gentlemen Good afternoon I am humbled and privileged for this opportunity to make few remarks and introduce the video about Namibia’s new generation of banknotes. Today is a special and momentous Day in the history of our beloved country. Today, we are not only celebrating 22 years of our Independence, we are not only celebrating 22 years of peace and stability, but we also witnessed the launch of the new generation of Namibia’s banknotes by his Excellency, the President of the Republic. Your Excellency, Directors of Ceremonies! The theme of my remarks is titled “Our Money, Our Pride, Our heroes and heroines, we Honour, know your currency”. This is because the new banknotes launched a moment ago are not just decorated papers but are very important national payment instruments that symbolize our sovereignty, nationhood, and natural diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Genocide in Namibia
    www.ssoar.info Remembering Genocide in Namibia Reitz, Núrel Bahí; Mannitz, Sabine Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (HSFK) Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Reitz, N. B., & Mannitz, S. (2021). Remembering Genocide in Namibia. (PRIF Working Papers, 53). Frankfurt am Main: Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-73450-7 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/GDP.Pdf
    DEVELOPMENTAL FUSION: CHINESE INVESTMENT, RESOURCE NATIONALISM, AND THE DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS OF URANIUM MINING IN NAMIBIA by MEREDITH J. DEBOOM B.A., University of Iowa, 2009 M.A. University of Colorado at Boulder, 2013 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geography 2018 This thesis entitled: Developmental Fusion: Chinese Investment, Resource Nationalism, and the Distributive Politics of Uranium Mining in Namibia written by Meredith J. DeBoom has been approved for the Department of Geography John O’Loughlin, Chair Joe Bryan, Committee Member Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRB protocol # 14-0112 iii Abstract DeBoom, Meredith J. (PhD, Geography) Developmental Fusion: Chinese Investment, Resource Nationalism, and the Distributive Politics of Uranium Mining in Namibia Thesis directed by Professor John O’Loughlin China’s rising global influence has significant implications for the politics of natural resource extraction and development in sub-Saharan Africa. Focusing on the uranium industry, I analyze how China’s influence operates at global, national, and sub-national scales in relation to natural resource politics in the southern African country of Namibia. Specifically, I draw on multi-methods fieldwork to evaluate 1) how Namibians are engaging with Chinese investments in mining and 2) what implications these engagements have for the politics of mining and development, including natural resource ownership and the distribution of mining-associated benefits and costs.
    [Show full text]
  • National Assembly Performance
    Institute for Public Policy Research Not Speaking Out: Measuring National Assembly Performance By Ellison Tjirera and Graham Hopwood IPPR Comment No. 4 September 2009 This paper analyses the amount of contributions that members of the National Assembly made to parliamentary debate from September 2005 to October 2007 as one indicator of parliamentary performance. Although it has been speculated that some members of the National Assembly contribute very little to debates on bills and motions, as far as the IPPR is aware no research since independence has actually sought to quantify how much MPs contribute to debates in the House. The principal measure used for this research paper was the number of lines each MP contributed to debate in the Hansard – the official record of parliament. Originally, the IPPR had hoped to examine Hansard from the inception of the current parliament in 2005 until mid-2009. However, this has proved impossible because Hansard is not available from October 2007 onwards since editions have not been published since then. For this reason this analysis is based on a two-year period from September 2005 to early October 2007, which was felt to be a long enough period to make an assessment of how much MPs contributed to debate. The methodology used by this research paper is restricted solely to the amount of lines that MPs have contributed to the official record of parliamentary proceedings. No attempt is made to assess the quality of those contributions as this would involve highly subjective value judgements. This paper also does not attempt to assess how MPs may contribute to other aspects of parliamentary life, for example the committee system.
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.0 Sanned Documents
    Confidential NAMIBIAN REVIEW: MARCH 2005 Confidential A BRIEF POLITICAL OVERVIEW AND CURRENT ASSESSMENT OF DIAMOND DEVELOPMENTS IN NAMIBIA 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The recent elections in Namibia saw the ruling South West African Peoples Organisation (Swapo) swept back into power with the same number of seats as the previous election in 1999. With the new presidential candidate Hifikepunye Lukas Pohamba only being inaugurated on 24 March, continuity of policy on all levels is more or less expected, given the fact that Pohamba was hand-chosen by outgoing president Sam Nujoma to replace him. Potential rivals for the Swapo presidency were dealt with in the months leading up to the elections. This included specifically Hidipo Hamutenya, once one of Swapo's favourite sons, who was unceremoniously dumped as foreign minister by Nujoma in May 2004 just days before the Swapo Congress to choose Nujoma's successor. Though defeated, Hamutenya's background and support base in amongst people _ who were part of Swapo's Peoples Uberation Army of Namibia (Plan), will ensure that he emerges once again as Pohamba's chief challenger for the position in five years time. The opposition remains weak and in general disarray with the once powerful Democratic Turnhalle Alliance (DTA) , having lost nearly half the parliamentary seats it had prior to the last elections. As far as developments on the diamond front are concerned the report makes the following broad points: • Continuity in the government's diamond policy can be expected under Pohamba. • Lev Leviev has been the driving force behind changes in Namibia's mining legislation in 1999 and further changes being contemplated for the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homecoming of Ovaherero and Nama Skulls: Overriding Politics And
    i i i The homecoming of Ovaherero and i Nama skulls: overriding politics and injustices HUMAN REMAINS & VIOLENCE Vilho Amukwaya Shigwedha The University of Namibia [email protected] Abstract In October 2011, twenty skulls of the Herero and Nama people were repatriated from Germany to Namibia. So far, y-ve skulls and two human skeletons have been repatriated to Namibia and preparations for the return of more skulls from Germany were at an advanced stage at the time of writing this article. Nonetheless, the skulls and skeletons that were returned from Germany in the past have been disappointingly laden with complexities and politics, to such an extent that they have not yet been handed over to their respective communities for mourning and burials. In this context, this article seeks to investigate the practice of ‘anonymis- ing’ the presence of human remains in society by exploring the art and politics of the Namibian state’s memory production and sanctioning in enforcing restrictions on the aected communities not to perform, as they wish, their cultural and ritual practices for the remains of their ancestors. Key words: Skulls, Herero, Nama, genocide, Germany, Namibia Introduction Until 1919, today’s Namibia was ocially the colony of German South West Africa (GSWA). This came as a result of the 1884/85 Berlin Conference, which formally recognised Germany’s right to operate in and colonise the territory that it renamed GSWA.1 German colonial occupation of this territory, which was renamed Namibia in 1968, lasted from 1885 until 1919, when Imperial Germany was defeated in the First World War and subsequently lost her colonies in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • National Archives of Namibia Findaid 2/55
    National Archives of Namibia Findaid 2/55 Findaid 2/55 A.0555 Namibia Refugee Project 1981-1990 Compiled by Brigitte Lau, March 1996 Revised and updated by Werner Hillebrecht, August 2012 National Archives of Namibia Findaid 2/55: A.0555 Namibia Refugee Project Compiled by Brigitte Lau, March 1996 2nd ed., revised and updated by Werner Hillebrecht, August 2012 © National Archives of Namibia, 2012 Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA Republic of Namibia Ministry of Education, Arts and Culture National Archives of Namibia P/Bag 13250 Windhoek Namibia Tel. +264–61–2935211 (switchboard), 2935210 or 2935222 (reading room) Fax +264–61–2935207 [email protected] ii Findaid 2/55 Namibia Refugee Project A.0555 Contents Introduction iv About the second edition v 1 Administration 6 2 Solidarity and related agencies 6 3 Donations, fundraising and related matters 7 4 Training and scholarships 7 5 Namibian organisations 8 6 Projects and project administration 8 7 Draft/products: Literacy Campaign 9 7 a SWAPO Literacy Campaign 10 8 Teaching English 10 9 Namibian Literacy Project 10 10 General information packs 11 11 Conferences / Meetings 11 12 Audiovisual and other records 11 13 Items returned from Archives Library 12 14 Bulletin board 13 15 Telexes 13 16 Annual and other reports 13 List of items transferred to Archives Library 16 List of catalogued photographs 20 iii Findaid 2/55 Namibia Refugee Project A.0555 Private Accession A.0555 Namibia Refugee Project Introduction The Namibia Refugee Project (NRP) The NRP was established in 1981 by a group of exile solidarity workers, many of them Namibians, in close co-operation with SWAPO.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and the Ancestors: Challenges to Customary and Environmental Law
    BIODIVERSITY AND THE ANCESTORS: CHALLENGES TO CUSTOMARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CASE STUDIES FROM NAMIBIA EDITED BY MANFRED O. HINZ AND OLIVER C. RUPPEL This publication is dedicated to the memory of Nanzala Siyambango who was murdered on 31 March 2007. Deadly bullets terminated her earthly life while she was preparing to enter an LL M programme under the BIOTA Project. Her commitment as a promising student in African customary law, her commitment as a human being, and her commitment in the spirit of humanity will not be forgotten. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ...................................................................................................................................v The contributors.................................................................................................................vii Editors’ note.........................................................................................................................xi Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................xiii List of abbreviations ..........................................................................................................xv Note on the use of words in African languages...............................................................xvi List of photographs ...........................................................................................................xvi Map of Namibia................................................................................................................xvii
    [Show full text]