Adaptation Finance Under a Copenhagen Agreed Outcome

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adaptation Finance Under a Copenhagen Agreed Outcome Research Report, Stockholm Environment Institute, 2009 Adaptation Finance under a Copenhagen Agreed Outcome Åsa Persson, Richard J.T. Klein, Clarisse Kehler Siebert, Aaron Atteridge, Benito Müller, Juan Hoffmaister, Michael Lazarus, Takeshi Takama Adaptation Finance under a Copenhagen Agreed Outcome Åsa Persson, Richard J.T. Klein, Clarisse Kehler Siebert, Aaron Atteridge, Benito Müller, Juan Hoffmaister, Michael Lazarus, Takeshi Takama Stockholm Environment Institute Kräftriket 2B 106 91 Stockholm Sweden Tel: +46 8 674 7070 Fax: +46 8 674 7020 Web: www.sei-international.org Publications Manager: Erik Willis Web Manager: Howard Cambridge Editors: Andrew Mash, Tom Gill Layout: Richard Clay Cover photo: © Aaron Atteridge This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes, without special permission from the copyright holder(s) provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose, without the written permission of the copyright holder(s). Copyright © October 2009 by Stockholm Environment Institute ISBN 978-91-86125-13-4 Contents List of tables, figures and boxes v Abbreviations vi Acknowledgments viii Executive summary 1 1 Introduction 6 1.1 Background: adaptation under the UNFCCC 6 1.2 Objective and scope of this report 9 1.3 The structure of the report 10 2 Key questions on adaptation finance for Copenhagen and beyond 13 2.1 Adaptation finance in a broader development policy context 14 2.2 Relevant legal and moral principles 16 2.3 Adaptation finance under the UNFCCC 22 2.4 Contentious issues in the negotiations on adaptation finance 23 3 Assessing, costing and planning for adaptation needs 30 3.1 Introduction 30 3.2 Definitions and typologies for adaptation 31 3.3 Assessing and prioritising adaptation needs 35 3.4 Costing adaptation needs 43 3.5 Planning for adaptation 47 3.6 Summary and conclusions 56 4 Delivery of adaptation finance 59 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Public sector delivery 60 4.3 The role for civil society and private sector delivery 79 4.4 Criteria for eligibility and prioritisation of adaptation projects and programmes 84 4.5 Summary and conclusions 89 5 Governance of adaptation finance 91 5.1 Current governance of adaptation finance 91 5.2 Views on the current governance of adaptation finance 94 5.3 Proposals for future governance of adaptation financing 94 iii 5.4 Discussion 104 5.5 Summary and conclusions 107 6 Sources of finance 109 6.1 Introduction 109 6.2 The adaptation funding gap and existing funding commitments 110 6.3 Levels of financing under a Copenhagen Agreed Outcome 112 6.4 Proposals for new sources of adaptation finance 115 6.5 Summary and conclusions 125 7 The role of the private sector 126 7.1 Introduction 126 7.2 The rationale for engaging the private sector 128 7.3 The private sector as source of new finance 129 7.4 The private sector as provider of risk-sharing mechanisms 137 7.5 The private sector as supplier of innovative goods and services 142 7.6 Climate proofing private sector investment 143 7.7 How can a new climate agreement stimulate private sector contribution to adaptation? 145 8 Equity, justice and trust issues 151 8.1 Introducing the “fairness imperative” in adaptation funding 151 8.2 Defining equity and justice, and their relevance in the context of adaptation financing 152 8.3 The equity problem in delivery, governance and generating adaptation financing 154 8.4 Summary and conclusion 156 9 Conclusions and recommendations 158 9.1 Key messages of the individual chapters 158 9.2 Six overarching messages 163 References 168 ANNEX I Summary of Party positions on adaptation up to April 2009 177 ANNEX II Scenarios for carbon market options 187 iv List of tables Table 2.1: Overview of funds available and disbursed for adaptation under the GEF-managed financial instruments, as of November 2008 23 Table 2.2: Summary of selected proposals by parties for future adaptation financing arrangements under the UNFCCC 27 Table 3.1: Adaptation activities as expressed in the NAPAs to meet the urgent and immediate needs of the least developed countries, by sector 37 Table 4.1: Overview of approved adaptation projects in terms of size, region and scale 65 Table 4.2: Approved adaptation projects, by sector 67 Table 4.3: Overview of countries receiving financial support for one or more adaptation 70 Table 4.4: Application of principles to delivery agents of public adaptation finance 76 Table 4.5: Summary of adaptation work conducted by selected international NGOs 80 Table 6.1: Current adaptation funding gap, million USD 112 Table 6.2: Summary comparison of options against criteria 124 Table 7.1: Public private partnership roles in adaptation 146 Table 10.1: Summary of party positions on adaptation up to April 2009 177 Table 10.2: Carbon Markets - scale of funding 187 List of figures Figure 1.1: Stages of the adaptation finance chain and the structure of this report 11 Figure 2.1: The adaptation-development continuum 16 Figure 3.1: Characterisation of adaptation projects according to objective 40 Figure 3.2: Projected climate impact by sector of temperature increases 42 Figure 5.1: Current governance system of adaptation finance under the GEF 93 Figure 5.2: Institutional architecture of the G77+China Proposal 96 Figure 5.3: Institutional architecture of the Reformed UNFCCC Financial Mechanism (RFM) 98 Figure 5.4: Institutional architecture of the Compact Model 101 Figure 5.5: Different finance regimes 105 Figure 6.1: Range of estimated funding levels created by various revenue options, 2012 119 Figure 6.2: Range of estimated funding levels created by various revenue options, 2020 120 Figure 9.1: Channels for adaptation finance to developing countries 165 v List of boxes Box 1.1: Text of the BAP on enhanced action on adaptation (Decision 1/CP.13, para. 1.c.i–v) 7 Box 1.2: Text of the BAP on enhanced action on the provision of financial resources and investment for mitigation and adaptation (Decision 1/CP.13, para. 1.e.i–vi) 8 Box 2.1: UNFCCC articles relevant to adaptation finance 20 Box 3.1: The Nairobi Work Programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation 49 Box 7.1: Case study in private sector financing: World Bank-SEB Green Bonds 134 Abbreviations AAU Assigned amount unit AFB Adaptation Fund Board AOSIS Alliance of Small Island States AWG-KP Ad-Hoc Working Group on the Kyoto Protocol AWG-LCA Ad-Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action BAP Bali Action Plan CBDR Common but differentiated responsibilities CCSAP Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (Bangladesh) CDM Clean Development Mechanism CER Certified emission reductions CM Compact Model (of the UK’s Future Financial Architecture for Climate Change) CMP Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties COP Conference of the Parties DAC Development Assistance Committee (of the OECD) EU European Union FDI Foreign direct investment GCCA Global Climate Change Alliance GDP Gross domestic product GEF Global Environment Facility GFDRR Global Facility for Disaster Risk Reduction and Recovery GNP Gross national product GNI Gross national income IET International emissions trading vi IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC AR4 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fourth Assessment Report JI Joint Implementaion LDC Least Developed Countries LDCF Least Developed Countries Fund LEG Least Developed Countries Expert Group MAF Multilateral Adaptation Fund MCCF Multilateral Climate Change Fund (Mexican) MCII Munich Climate Insurance Initiative MDG Millennium Development Goals MDTF Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Climate Change MIE Multilateral implementing entity MRV Measurable, reportable, verifiable NAP National Adaptation Plan NAPA National Adaptation Programme of Action NC National Communication NGO Non-governmental organisation NIE National implementing entity ODA Official development assistance OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PPCR Pilot Programme for Climate Resilience PPP Polluter-pays principle PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper RBM Results-based management RFM Reformed Financial Mechanism SBI Subsidiary Body for Implementation SIDS Small Island Developing States SCCF Special Climate Change Fund SPA Strategic Priority “Piloting an Operational Approach to Adaptation” (of the GEF) TNA Technology Needs Assessment UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change UN BOA UN Board of Auditors UN OIOS UN Office for Internal Oversight Services USD United States dollars WBCSD World Business Council for Sustainable Development WWF World Wildlife Fund vii Acknowledgments The preparation of this report was supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (Mistra), through its research programme Clipore (Climate Policy Research). The authors thank editors Andrew Mash and Tom Gill for their excellent support, and a number of external reviewers for their generous input. viii Stockholm Environment Institute EXECUTIVE SUMMARY dopted at the thirteenth session of the Conference of the Parties to the United ANations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC COP 13) in December 2007, the Bali Action Plan (BAP) raised the political status of adaptation and opened discussions on international adaptation finance. Since COP 13, financing has in fact proved to be a significant stumbling block in climate change negotiations under the UNFCCC. This report provides a comprehensive reporting and analysis of the issues and principles underlying this impasse, as well as the most current proposals and options on adaptation financing available to Parties. In so doing, this report presents options for overcoming obstacles and reaching an agreement on adaptation financing as part of a Copenhagen Agreed Outcome at COP 15 in Copenhagen in December, 2009. It submits that such an agreement on adaptation financing is in fact vital to reaching a post-2012 international agreement on climate change.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Indonesia in the G-20: Background, Role and Objectives of Indonesia’S Membership
    G-20 Research Project: The Role of Indonesia in the G-20: Background, Role and Objectives of Indonesia’s Membership G-20 Research Team Yulius P Hermawan (Coordinator) Wulani Sriyuliani Getruida H Hardjowijono Sylvie Tanaga Published by G-20 Research Project The Role of Indonesia in the G-20: Background, Role and Objectives of Indonesia’s Membership Yulius P Hermawan G-20 Research Team Published by Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Indonesia Office in cooperation with Department of International Relations, Parahyangan University Design & Layout: Malhaf Budiharto Komunitas Pejaten First editions, May 2011 ISBN: 978-602-8866-03-3 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Indonesia Office Jl. Kemang Selatan II No. 2A Jakarta Selatan 12730 DKI Jakarta - Indonesia Tel. +62 (0)21 7193 711 Fax +62 (0)21 7179 1358 E-mail:[email protected]. Preface The G-20 has commenced its activities since the inception in 1999 in Germany. However the international community only began to recognize its importance after the United States hosted the first G-20 Summit in 2008 in Washington. This first summit signaled the change of the G-20 from ministerial to summit level. The G-20 became a high profiled forum after the group’s leaders agreed to hold G-20 Summits twice a year and argued for the need to pursue urgently an agenda for rescuing the world economy from malaise. They accepted that unless they work together in close coordination and cooperation, the world economy would continue to decline. The profile of G-20 has been rocketing highly since the G-20 leaders agreed that G-20 should become the premier forum for their economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2001/2002 Annual Review And
    Tea pickers in Herkulu, Tanzania, where the extra money from Fairtrade has paid for new roofs for workers’ housing. Cafédirect’s new coffees and teas, and Traidcraft’s Cocoa 1994 – 2001: Comparison of Geobars and boxed chocolates. Fairtrade & New York Exchange Prices 2500 Mainstreaming Fairtrade – supermarket brands launched 2000 Fairtrade One of the key objectives of the Fairtrade Foundation from the outset nearly 10 years ago was the 1500 ‘mainstreaming’ of fairly traded products. While the pioneering work of fair trade shops remains extremely New York 1000 important in making fair trade a reality for significant US $ per tonne number of producers, the products have to be in the places where the majority of shoppers can easily find 500 them. The largest part of the mainstream food market is, 0 April 1994 September 1997 – November 1998 December 2001 obviously, the large supermarket chains and Fairtrade products can now be found in the vast majority of these outlets. Within this sector, Own Brand products represent It doesn’t Costa lot a large and rapidly growing element of total sales that Costa Coffee, one of the leading high street coffee shops complement the activities of supplier brands. with over 280 outlets, became the first chain to offer customers the option of Fairtrade coffee and tea, under The Co-operative Group started the trend for Own Brand the Cafédirect and Teadirect brand, on a regular basis in Fairtrade products in March 2000 by launching a November 2000. Their coffee buyer worked with chocolate bar (jointly branded with Divine), followed by Cafédirect and TWIN Trading to produce a unique blend a roast & ground coffee, and other products are under of Fairtrade coffee to suit Costa’s famous Italian-style development.
    [Show full text]
  • Participant List
    Participant List 10/20/2020 12:59:08 PM Category First Name Last Name Position Organization Nationality CSO Jamal Aazizi Chargé de la logistique Association Tazghart Morocco Luz Abayan Program Officer Child Rights Coalition Asia Philippines Babak Abbaszadeh President And Chief Toronto Centre For Global Canada Executive Officer Leadership In Financial Supervision Amr Abdallah Director, Gulf Programs Education for Employment - United States EFE Ziad Abdel Samad Executive Director Arab NGO Network for Lebanon Development TAZI Abdelilah Président Associaion Talassemtane pour Morocco l'environnement et le développement ATED Abla Abdellatif Executive Director and The Egyptian Center for Egypt Director of Research Economic Studies Nabil Abdo MENA Senior Policy Oxfam International Lebanon Advisor Baako Abdul-Fatawu Executive Director Centre for Capacity Ghana Improvement for the Wellbeing of the Vulnerable (CIWED) Maryati Abdullah Director/National Publish What You Pay Indonesia Coordinator Indonesia Dr. Abel Executive Director Reach The Youth Uganda Switzerland Mwebembezi (RTY) Suchith Abeyewickre Ethics Education Arigatou International Sri Lanka me Programme Coordinator Diam Abou Diab Fellow Arab NGO Network for Lebanon Development Hayk Abrahamyan Community Organizer for International Accountability Armenia South Caucasus and Project Central Asia Aliyu Abubakar Secretary General Kano State Peace and Conflict Nigeria Resolution Association Sunil Acharya Regional Advisor, Climate Practical Action Nepal and Resilience Salim Adam Public Health
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization's Contradictions
    Globalization’s Contradictions Since the 1980s, globalization and neoliberalism have brought about a comprehen- sive restructuring of everyone’s lives. People are being ‘disciplined’ by neoliberal economic agendas, ‘transformed’ by communication and information technology changes, global commodity chains and networks, and in the Global South in particular, destroyed livelihoods, debilitating impoverishment and disease pan- demics, among other disastrous disruptions, are also globalization’s legacies. This collection of geographical treatments of such a complex set of processes unearths the contradictions in the impacts of globalization on peoples’ lives. Globalization’s Contradictions firstly introduces globalization in all its intricacy and contrariness, followed by substantive coverage of globalization’s dimensions. Areas that are covered in depth are: • globalization’s macroeconomic faces • globalization’s unruly spaces • globalization’s geopolitical faces • ecological globalization • globalization’s cultural challenges • globalization from below • fair globalization Globalization’s Contradictions is a critical examination of the continuing role of international and supranational institutions and their involvement in the political and economic management and determination of global restructuring. Deliberately, this collection raises questions, even as it offers geographical insights and thought- ful assessments of globalization’s multifaceted ‘faces and spaces’. Dennis Conway is Professor of Geography and Latin American and Caribbean
    [Show full text]
  • Bottom-Billion1.Pdf
    ·THE·· . ·BOTTOM BILLI.ON··. Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing 311d ·What Can Be DOlle About It . "Set to become a classic." -The Economist . PAUL COLLIER OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University's objective of excellence in research. scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary [taly Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyrighl © 2007 by Paul Collier Published by Oxford University Press, Inc, 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rightS reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording. or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Collier, Paul. The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it J by Paul Collier. p. cm. ISBN 978-0-19-531145-7 (cloth) 1. Poor-Developing countries. 2. Poverty-Developing countries I, Title. HC79_P6C634 2007 338.9009l"/2'4-clc22 2006036630 9 8 Primed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Contents Preface ix Part 1 What's the Issue? 1. Falling Behind and Falling Apart: The Bottom Billion 3 Pa rt 2 The Traps 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rich, the Poor and the Future of the Earth
    THE RICH, THE POOR AND THE FUTURE OF THE EARTH: EQUITY IN A CONSTRAINED WORLD d The problem – an overview JUSTICE AND EQUITY FOR LIFE IN ALL ITS FULLNESS Foreword by the Rev Dr Olav Fykse Tveit General Secretary of the World Council of Churches Twenty years ago, at the Earth Summit The World Council of Churches (WCC) has in Rio, the ecumenical delegation that for decades been stressing the intimate participated at the United Nations relationships between poverty, wealth Conference on Environment and and the environment. The Justice, Peace Development (UNCED) wrote a letter and Integrity of Creation process since the to the churches that stated: ‘UNCED is 1980s clearly stated this interconnection. meeting 20 years after the Stockholm The recent insights on eco-justice stress conference on the environment and not the need to address at the same time one single major trend of environmental ecological and economic justice. In fact, degradation has been reversed. All to respond adequately to the threats life today is endangered to a far higher humanity and the whole earth are facing degree than 20 years ago. We are fearful today, a holistic approach is needed. about even more brutal facts 20 years The quest for sustainable communities, from now.’ Now, facing the United Nations promoted by the WCC since the 1970s, Conference on Sustainable Development has contributed to the understanding (UNCSD), Rio+20, we may have a of the three pillars of sustainable similar reaction. development: economic, social and The process that formed the United environmental; but as this Christian Aid Nations Conference on the Human report rightly states, the dominant rise Environment (UNCHE) in Stockholm in of the economic pillar has eclipsed the 1972, followed by the UNCED in Rio 1992 goal of social equity and environmental and the World Summit on Sustainable sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Christian Aid Ministries Annual Report A report of 2018 activities Haiti-Sponsor-A-Child School Program Dear Supporter Friends Many things have changed since the beginning of Christian out and to be the hands and feet of Jesus to those who are Aid Ministries (CAM) in 1981. But several things have re- suffering. Many people know very little about God and His mained very much the same—God’s grace and faithfulness plan of salvation for mankind. But seeing God’s people in ac- and our supporters’ enthusiasm and generosity! tion can be very powerful and draw people to Him. It is often At CAM, we consider ourselves a “channel” and a “servant through tough times that people find the Lord and eternal of the church.” We try to create an awareness of needs and life. No doubt it is far better to lose the temporal but gain the provide ways for supporters to help. It is a wonderful bless- eternal! Thank you for enabling us to take advantage of these ing and a great privilege to labor with each of you to bring unique opportunities. physical and spiritual aid to our suffering world. Only God knows how long we will be able to continue to work It is because of tens of thousands of faithful supporters as freely as we do now. Let us do what we can, while we can! (from all fifty states and many countries) that we are able, For “the night cometh, when no man can work” (John 9:4). by the grace of God, to do what we do.
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Green Recovery?: Why Poorer Countries Must Not Be Left Behind by Richer Countries’ Recovery Plans
    Whose Green Recovery? Why poorer countries must not be left behind by richer countries’ recovery plans October 2020 2 Whose Green Recovery?: Why poorer countries must not be left behind by richer countries’ recovery plans Main author: Nafkote Gurmu Acknowledgements: Thanks to Philip Akello, Helen Collinson, Jessica Dator Bercilla, Richard Ewbank, Moises Gonzalez, Matti Kohonen, Katherine Kramer, Marianna Leite, Sophie Powell, Nadia Saracini, Yeeshu Shukla, Joe Ware, and Patrick Watt for their expert advice and inputs. Christian Aid is a Christian organisation that insists the world can and must be swiftly changed to one where everyone can live a full life, free from poverty. We work globally for profound change that eradicates the causes of poverty, striving to achieve equality, dignity and freedom for all, regardless of faith or nationality. We are part of a wider movement for social justice. We provide urgent, practical and effective assistance where need is great, tackling the effects of poverty as well as its root causes. christianaid.org.uk Contact us Christian Aid 35 Lower Marsh Waterloo London SE1 7RL T: +44 (0) 20 7620 4444 E: [email protected] W: christianaid.org.uk UK registered charity no. 1105851 Company no. 5171525 Scot charity no. SC039150 NI charity no. XR94639 Company no. NI059154 ROI charity no. CHY 6998 Company no. 426928 The Christian Aid name and logo are trademarks of Christian Aid © Christian Aid October 2020 Whose Green Recovery?: Why poorer countries must not be left behind by richer countries’ recovery plans
    [Show full text]