DOCSLIB.ORG

Wastewater Treatment Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wastewater Treatment Project Initial Environmental Examination (Draft) Project Number: 51365-001 June 2020 Kazakhstan: Urban Infrastructure Modernization Program – Wastewater Treatment Project Reconstruction of Wastewater Treatment Plant in Satpaev City Prepared by The Kazakhstan Center for Communal Services Modernization and Reform (KazCenter ZhKH) for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. WASTEWATER MODERNISATION PROGRAM OF GOVERNMENT OF KAZAKHSTAN KAZ: “RECONSTRUCTION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IN SATPAEV CITY” INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION (IEE) (DRAFT) June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................1 A. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................9 A.1 General ................................................................................................................................9 A.2 Background .......................................................................................................................9 A.3 Purpose of the Report ....................................................................................................9 A.5. Project Proponent .........................................................................................................11 A.7. IEE Boundaries ..............................................................................................................11 A.8. Methodology applied ...................................................................................................12 A.9. Structure of the report .................................................................................................13 B. POLICY, LEGAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ....................................15 B.1. General ............................................................................................................................15 B.2. Country policies and administrative framework ..................................................15 B.2.1. Overall legal framework .................................................................................................................... 15 B.2.2. Environmental Impact Assessment ............................................................................................... 16 B.2.3. Administrative Framework ............................................................................................................... 16 B.3. Air, Water, Land and Noise Legislation ..................................................................17 B.3.1. Air Quality Legislation ...................................................................................................................... 17 B.3.2. Water Quality Legislation ................................................................................................................. 18 B.3.3. Health and Safety ............................................................................................................................... 20 B.3.4 Physical Cultural Heritage ................................................................................................................ 21 B.3.5. Waste Management ........................................................................................................................... 22 B.3.6. International Conventions and Treaties ....................................................................................... 24 B.4. Environmental Quality Standards ............................................................................26 B.4.1. Air Quality Standards ........................................................................................................................ 28 B.4.2. Water Quality Standards .................................................................................................................. 29 Synthetic-surface substances ...............................................................................................33 B.4.3. Soil Quality Legislation and Standards ........................................................................................ 37 B.4.3. Noise Standards ................................................................................................................................. 38 B.5. Sanitary Protection Zones ..........................................................................................39 B.5.1. Setting the borders of a sanitary protection zone ..................................................................... 40 B.6. ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 ...................................................................40 B.7. Comparison of ADB requirements and legislation of Republic of Kazakhstan ..............................................................................................................................44 C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ...................................................................................49 C.1. Background ....................................................................................................................49 C.2. Need for the Project .....................................................................................................49 C.3. Project location .............................................................................................................49 C.4. Existing Situation ..........................................................................................................50 C.4.1. Existing Master Plan .......................................................................................................................... 50 C.4.2. Sector Governance and Performance ........................................................................................... 51 C.4.3. Water Supply Network ...................................................................................................................... 51 C 4.4. Wastewater Network .......................................................................................................................... 53 C.4.5. Existing WWTP ................................................................................................................................... 54 C.4.10. Design Standard ............................................................................................................................... 60 C.4.11. Design Horizon ................................................................................................................................. 60 C.5. Conceptual Design Sizing of the New WWTP .......................................................61 C.5.1. Plant Hydraulics ................................................................................................................................. 65 C.5.2. Design Components .......................................................................................................................... 65 C.5.2.1. Inlet and Metering Channel........................................................................................................... 65 C.5.10. Reuse of treated water ...........................................................................................68 C.5.3. Layout of the new WWTP ................................................................................................................. 68 C.6. Construction Activities ................................................................................................69 C.6.1. Land Acquisition ................................................................................................................................ 69 C.6.2. Access Roads ..................................................................................................................................... 69 C.6.3. Methods to accomplish main works.............................................................................................. 69 C.6.4. Earthworks ........................................................................................................................................... 69 C.6.5. Concrete works (Monolithic foundations, frames of buildings) ............................................. 70 C.6.6. Construction Equipment .................................................................................................................. 71 D. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................72 D.1. ‘No Project’ Alternative ...............................................................................................72 D.2.Technical Options for New WWTP ............................................................................72 D.2.1. Wastewater treatment technologies .............................................................................................. 73 D.2.2. Wastewater treatment processes..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pdf 412.39 K
    DOI:10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.12.5203 The Incidence of Malignant Tumors in Environmentally Disadvantaged Regions of Kazakhstan RESEARCH ARTICLE The Incidence of Malignant Tumors in Environmentally Disadvantaged Regions of Kazakhstan Arstan Mamyrbayev1*, Timur Djarkenov2, Askar Dosbayev2, Nailya Dusembayeva3, Anatolyi Shpakov3, Gulmira Umarova2, Yelena Drobchenko3, Temirgali Kunurkulzhayev2, Mukhtar Zhaylybaev², Gulnar Isayeva² Abstract Objective: To explore the prevalence of malignant tumors in the adult population through 2003-2014 in parts of the Aral Sea region: a zone of ecological disaster, a zone of ecological crisis and a zone of precritical conditions. Methods: The long-time average annual levels of cancer morbidity stratified by zones of the Aral Sea region and trends of long-time average annual incidence indicators of malignant tumors were identified. Leading cancer localizations in the adult population was established and associations between cancer incidence and environmental pollution were analyzed. In addition, associations between individual risk factors and cancer incidence in the adult population was established. Correlations between a hazard index and the cancer incidence in the adult population were calculated. Results: In all three Aral Sea regions, as well as in Zhanaarkinskii district, leading cancer in adult population was esophageal, stomach, tracheal, lung, hepatobiliary, and breast. Long-time average annual levels of cancer morbidity in adult population living in the Aral sea region is 1.5 times higher comparing to the control region. In particular, long-time average annual levels of cancer morbidity in adult population living in the zone of ecological disaster was 57.2% higher, in the zone of ecological crisis - 61.9% higher, and in the zone of precritical condition – 16.8% higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics and Interpretation Report
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN Kazakh National Research Technical University named after K.I. Satpayev Institute of Geology, Oil and Mining Department of Oil, Gas and Ore Geophysics Auyesbek Alikhan Topic: «Electrical exploration and reconnaissance by sounding method in the modification of ―INFINI TEM‖ at the Dusembay site in the Karaganda region» DIPLOMA WORK Specialty 5B070600 – Geology and exploration of mineral deposits Almaty 2020 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN Kazakh National Research Technical University named after K.I. Satpayev K. Turysov Institute of Geology, Oil and Mining Department of Oil, Gas and Ore Geophysics ADMITTED TO DEFENCE Head of the Department of Geophysics Doctor of geol.-miner. sciences, professor Abetov.А.Е. ―_____‖____________2020y. DIPLOMA WORK Topic: ―«Electrical exploration and reconnaissance by sounding method in the modification of ―INFINI TEM‖ at the Dusembay site in the Karaganda region»‖ Specialty 5B070600 – Geology and exploration of mineral deposits Done by Auyesbek Alikhan Scientific supervisor Jukebayev M.Y. ―_____‖_________________2020y. Almaty 2020 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN Kazakh National Research Technical University named after K.I. Satpayev Institute of Geology, Oil and Mining Department of Oil, Gas and Ore Geophysics APPROVED BY Head of the Department of Geophysics Doctor of geological- mineralogical sciences, professor Abetov А.Е. ―_____‖______________2020y. THE TASK to complete the diploma work Student: Auyesbek Alikhan Topic: ―Electrical exploration and reconnaissance by sounding method in the modification of ―INFINI TEM‖ at the Dusembay site in the Karaganda region‖ Approved by order of the Rector of the University №762–b from "27" January 2020y.
    [Show full text]
  • №2 (3)/2017 Scientific Journal “Fundamentalis Scientiam” (Madrid, Spain)
    №2 (3)/2017 Scientific journal “Fundamentalis scientiam” (Madrid, Spain) ISSN 0378-5955 The journal is registered and published in Spain It is published 12 times a year. Articles are accepted in Spanish, Polish, English, Russian, Ukrainian, German, French languages for publication. Scientific journal “Fundamentalis scientiam” (lat. “Basic Science”) was established in Spain in the autumn of 2016. Its goal is attracting the masses to the interest of “knowledge.” We have immediately decided to grow to the international level, namely to bond the scientists of the Eurasian continent under the aegis of the common work, by filling the journal with research materials, articles, and results of work. Editorial board: Chief editor: Petr Novotný – Palacky University, Olomouc Managing editor: Lukáš Procházka – Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem Petrenko Vladislav, PhD in geography, lecturer in social and economic geography. (Kiev, Ukraine) Andrea Biyanchi – University of Pavia, Pavia Bence Kovács – University of Szeged, Szeged Franz Gruber – University of Karl and Franz, Graz Jean Thomas – University of Limoges, Limoges Igor Frennen – Politechnika Krakowska im. Tadeusza Kościuszki Plaza Santa Maria Soledad Torres Acosta, Madrid, 28004 E-mai: [email protected] Web: www.fundamentalis-scientiam.com CONTENT CULTURAL SCIENCES Tattigul Kartaeva, Ainur Yermekbayeva THE SEMANTICS OF THE CHEST IN KAZAKH CULTURE .................................................................. 4 ECONOMICS Khakhonova N.N. INTERCONNECTION OF ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS IN THE COMPANY MANAGEMENT ...................................................... 10 HISTORICAL SCIENCES Bexeitov G.T., Satayeva B.E. Kunanbaeva A. СURRENT CONDITION AND RESEARCH SYSTEM FEEDS KAZAKHS .................................. 25 PROBLEMS OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL Eleuov Madiyar, Moldakhmet Arkhad EXCAVATIONS CONDUCTED WERE MADE IN MEDIEVAL SITE UTYRTOBE .............................. 28 THE MONUMENTS OF NEAR THE LOCATION– RAKHAT IN 2015 (ALMATY) ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Kazakhstan in 2014
    2014 Minerals Yearbook KAZAKHSTAN U.S. Department of the Interior December 2017 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF KAZAKHSTAN By Elena Safirova Kazakhstan produced a diverse range of mineral commodities beginning of the year, the Ministry of Industry and New and was the world’s leading producer of uranium (41% of world Technologies (MINT) announced that the Government planned output); the second-ranked producer of chromite (14% of world to announce tenders for exploration of 105 prospective lots. output); and the fourth-ranked producer of titanium sponge According to the program for development of the mineral (5% of world output, excluding United States production) resource base, the Government would invest 161 billion and magnesium metal (2% of world output). The country tenge (about $898 million) between 2015 and 2019. The was also a significant producer of barite, bauxite, cadmium, MINT reported that during 2000–13 Kazakhstan invested copper, sulfur, and zinc. The mineral industry accounted for 234 billion tenge (about $1.31 billion) in exploration. In a significant share of the country’s gross domestic product addition, special attention would be paid to exploration in close (GDP) and export revenue; petroleum and natural gas were the proximity to towns and cities where livelihoods depended on leading commodities in terms of production value. Kazakhstan’s the availability of minable mineral resources. An investment Government promoted the development of the mineral industry of 25 billion tenge (about $139 million) would be invested in and owned interests in a number of significant mineral- socioeconomic development of the cities of Jezkazgan and commodity-producing companies (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposits of the Hydrocarbon Raw Materials of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Where It Is Possible to Introduce a Microbiological Method for Stimulating the Formation
    E3S Web of Conferences 280, 01002 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128001002 ICSF 2021 Deposits of the hydrocarbon raw materials of the Republic of Kazakhstan, where it is possible to introduce a microbiological method for stimulating the formation Olga Kuderinova1,*, Makhambet Shmanov1, and Mykhailo Filatiev2 1Karaganda Technical University, Development of Mineral Deposits Department, 56 N. Nazarbayev Str., 100027, Karaganda, Republic of Kazakhstan 2Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, 59a Central Ave., Severodonetsk, 93406, Ukraine Abstract. The article is devoted to the analysis and systematization of data on hydrocarbon deposits in the Republic of Kazakhstan, highlighting those aspects that will allow the use of this method. The microbiological method of exposure refers to the chemical methods of the tertiary stage of development of oil reservoirs. It has already proven its effectiveness in highly depleted, waterflooded formations with irregular, diffuse oil saturation. Its main advantages are its relative cheapness, it does not require additional equipment during injecting of the microorganisms into the reservoir, and for their nutrition, as a rule, food industry waste is used, and its implementation cannot cause harmful effects on the environment. Also, a fairly extensive database was compiled, according to which various classifications of the republic's deposits were created. 1 Introduction removed, plus gases that can be extremely hazardous to health will be released. And chemical solutions can The purpose of the study was to identify the parameters permanently poison underground waters, which will needed for the introduction of the method of entail the death of all flora on the surface. microbiological influence on oil reservoirs, justification of the need for its use, as well as collection, analysis and systematization of data on all known this type deposits of 2 About the method of the the republic.
    [Show full text]
  • 50387-001: Irrigation Rehabilitation Project
    Initial Environmental Examination August 2019 KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Project Karaghandy Province Subprojects Project No. 50387-001 Prepared by the Republican State Enterprise “KazvodKhoz”, Republic of Kazakhstan, for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation or, or reference to a particular territory or geographic are in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. TA-9317 KAZ: Irrigation Rehabilitation Sector Project Initial Environmental Examination of Subprojects in Karaghandy Province Table of Contents A. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 A.I. Purpose of the report ............................................................................ 1 A.2 Category of Project ................................................................................ 2 A.3 Project proponent .................................................................................. 2 A.4 IEE Boundaries ...................................................................................... 3 A.5 Methodology applied
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Kazakhstan
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 18 August 2007 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Report Warsaw 30 October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................... 3 III. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 4 IV. LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................................... 5 A. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................... 5 B. THE ELECTION SYSTEM .................................................................................................................... 5 C. ASSESSMENT OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK...................................................................................... 7 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................................... 8 A. STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE ELECTION ADMINISTRATION .......................................... 8 B. THE ORGANIZATION OF THE ELECTION......................................................................................... 10 C. ELECTRONIC VOTING.....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Kazakhmys to the Development of Regions of Presence
    CONTRIBUTION OF KAZAKHMYS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONS OF PRESENCE DATE EVENT 1997 A unique Medical Center in Jezkazgan city was commissioned on August 10, 1997. The Podrobnosti newspaper, founded by the Kazakhmys Corporation, was published on October 17, 1997. 1998 The Museum of History and Production, named after K. I. Satbayev (founded on August 01, 1997), was opened in Jezkazgan city on January 23, 1998. A “Miner” educational and production complex was created as part of the Jezkazgan Agrarian Technical College (ZHATK) in December 1998. The Jezkazgan Polytechnic College (ZHPTK) was established based on the ZHATK in 2005. It included the “Miner” Training and Production Plant (UPK) that was renamed into the “Mining” department. 1999 The construction of a cultural center, built on the Kazakhmys Corporation’s initiative, has been completed in Satbayev city. 2000 The Jezkazgan Medical Center was opened on March 15, 2000. Medical Center was a structural subdivision of Kazakhmys Corporation LLP until 2014. The clinic has been transformed into a separate legal entity with Kazakhmys Corporation LLP trust management since 2015. The Center has included a polyclinic in Satbayev city, health centers of Corporation Kazakhmys LLP in Satbayev and Jezkazgan cities, of the Zhomart Mine, except for the health center of the copper-smelting plant, since 2014. The trauma clinic of Satbayev city (the former medical and sanitary unit) has joined the Medical Center since 2015. Currently, the Center provides a wide range of medical services - from primary health care to high-tech operations and cooperates with leading clinics in Kazakhstan and with the Uni-clinic in Freiburg (Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Associations, Centres and Clubs for Unesco 4040
    As of November 2020 LIST OF ASSOCIATIONS, CENTRES AND CLUBS FOR UNESCO * 4040 TOTAL / 77 Member States * Breakdown by regions: 1744 Clubs in 15 APA MSs, 1719 Clubs in 22 AFR MSs, 463 Clubs in 26 ENA MSs (3 NatComs are currently reviewing Clubs’ accreditation), 77 Clubs in 10 ARB MSs, 37 Clubs in 4 LAC MSs. The List will be continuously evolving and updated as necessary. Contents ALGERIA – 3 TOTAL......................................................................................................................................... 5 ANGOLA – 1 TOTAL ........................................................................................................................................ 5 ARMENIA – 9 TOTAL ....................................................................................................................................... 5 AUSTRALIA – 1 TOTAL .................................................................................................................................... 6 AUSTRIA – 2 TOTAL ........................................................................................................................................ 6 AZERBAIJAN – 5 TOTAL ................................................................................................................................... 6 BELARUS – 56 TOTAL ...................................................................................................................................... 7 BELGIUM (FLANDERS) – 1 TOTAL .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Activities of the Human Rights
    Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) REPORT on the activities of the Human Rights Commissioner in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2016 ASTANA 2017 The report has been translated and published with the support of the OSCE Programme Office in Astana. This is not an OSCE report. OSCE is not responsible, nor does it necessarily endorse its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the Office of the Human Rights Commissioner of the Republic of Kazakhstan and do not reflect those of OSCE in Astana, OSCE or its Member States 2 REPORT on the activities of the Human Rights Commissioner in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2016 CONTENT Introduction.............................................................................................................................4 1. General Description of Inquiries Received............................................................................6 2. Powers Exercised by the Human Rights Commissioner in the Republic of Kazakhstan; Ombudsman’s Interaction with State Authorities, Civil Society, Mass Media......................16 3. Right to Liberty and Security of Person...............................................................................22 4. Right to Judicial Protection and Fair Trial, Enforcement of Court Rulings...........................30 5. Citizen Right to Receive Public Services.............................................................................37 6. Right to Freedom of Movement, Conferment of Citizenship................................................43 7. Property and Land Rights....................................................................................................51
    [Show full text]
  • Success Annual Report | 2017 Table of Content
    29 Copper Cu 63.546 14 Silicon Si 28.086 26 Iron Fe 55.847 30 Zinc Zn 65.370 79 Gold Au 196.967 Annual Report 2017 ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS ANNUAL REPORT | 2017 TABLE OF CONTENT Statement of Chairman External environment analysis Sustainable development report Information on internal audit of the Board of Directors 36 76 96 2 Legislative environment About the Report Information on external auditor Statement of Chairman 37 77 98 of the Management Board 3 Brief metals marker overview Stakeholder engagement Annexes 38 81 About the Company 1. Report on adherence 4 Innovation activity Economic aspects of sustainable to the principles of the Corporate 44 development Governance Code Strategic Report 85 102 6 Corporate governance 46 Environmental responsibility 2. Consolidated financial statements Business model 86 120 8 Sole Shareholder 49 Social responsibility 3. Table of GRI Content Index Key events of the year 89 174 9 Activity of the Board of Directors 49 Business ethics in the Company 4. Glossary Geography of operations 95 180 10 Activity of the Management Board 63 Contact information Operating activity review 181 14 Organizational structure 66 Production 15 Risk management and internal control Mining 68 20 Geological exploration 24 Information on the Company’s major transactions 29 Report on financial and economic performance results 30 Key performance indicators 31 Capital adequacy ratios 33 1 TAU-KEN SAMRUK NMC JSC ANNUAL REPORT | 2017 STATEMENT OF STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN CHAIRMAN OF THE OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD Dear colleagues, partners, investors! Dear Ladies and Gentlemen! It is a great honor for me to address you as the Chairman in the sphere of sustainable development and continuous We present you the Annual Report of Tau-Ken Samruk already provides more than 550 jobs, and upon completion of the Board of Directors of the National Mining Company improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Ecological and Economic Balance of the Territory of the Karaganda Region
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE VOL. LIII/2 2020 PL ISSN 0079-2985 DOI: 10.17951/pjss/2020.53.2.211 ANAR RAKHMETOVA*, RAIKHAN BEISENOVA*, KAMSHAT AKPAMBETOVA**, BUREN SCHARAW*** ASSESSMENT OF ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC BALANCE OF THE TERRITORY OF THE KARAGANDA REGION Received: 21.11.2019 Accepted: 08.09.2020 123Abstract. Currently, Kazakhstan is faced with the problem of a serious deterioration of the state of natural resources and the environment in all the most important environmental indicators. Almost a third of agricultural land is now degraded or is under serious threat, and more than 10 million hectares of potentially arable land in the past have been abandoned. This article discusses various methods and also carries out a comprehensive assessment of the environmental and economic balance of the Karaganda region. For the study on the state of the regional-scale object, the choice as the basis for analyzing the structure of the land seems to be the most adequate, since it is the land-use device that objectively reflects the current state of industrial, agricultural and recreational impact. A comprehensive assessment of the ecological and economic balance of the territory of the Karaganda region was carried out according to the ratio of the main land-use categories tak- ing into account the intensity of anthropogenic load. The coefficient of natural protection of the territory is determined and the outlined trends in the ecological and economic state are analyzed. Keywords: ecological and economic balance, Karaganda region, anthropogenic load, nature pro- tection, geoinformation technologies, ecological cartography, ArcGIS 10.1 * L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan; corresponding author: [email protected] ** E.A.
    [Show full text]