Jerry's Class Struggle in Edward Albee's the Zoo

JERRY’S CLASS STRUGGLE IN EDWARD ALBEE’S THE ZOO STORY

A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Program in English Language Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Magister Humaniora (M.Hum.) in English Language Studies

JOHAN KRISTANTO Student Number: 076332005

The Graduate Program in English Language Studies Sanata Dharma University Yogyakarta 2010

iii

STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY

This is to certify that all the ideas, phrases, and sentences, unless otherwise stated, are the ideas, phrases, and sentences of the thesis writer. The writer understands the full consequences including degree cancellation if he took somebody else‟s idea, phrase, or sentence without a proper reference.

Yogyakarta, August 23, 2010

Johan Kristanto

LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS

Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma:

Nama : Johan Kristanto Nomor Mahasiswa : 076332005

Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul:

JERRY’S CLASS STRUGGLE IN EDWARD ALBEE’S THE ZOO STORY beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian saya memberikan kepada perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan, mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan data, mendistribusikan secara terbatas dan mempublikasikannya di media internet atau media lain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta izin dari saya maupun memberi royalti kepada saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya sebagai penulis.

Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya.

Dibuat di Yogyakarta

Pada tanggal 23 Agustus 2010

Yang menyatakan

Johan Kristanto

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

It is a pleasure for me to thank all those who helped in the process of completing the thesis. It is my pleasure to name some of them.

I am indebted so much to Prof. Dr. C. Soebakdi Soemanto, S.U. for his patience, willingness, commitment, guidance, advice, and consolation to discuss this thesis. He invited me to think more deeply about it by asking challenging and curious questions. Meeting with him could last hours but it was fun, satisfying, and relieving.

I believed that without him I could not complete my thesis. I am very grateful for never-ending encouragements he gave to me in finishing the thesis and his invaluable support especially when I was down. His moral support and continuous guidance enabled me to finish this thesis. My gratitude goes also to Mrs. Lana Indrayati, his wife, for her hospitality, advice, and sharing at the dining table. They always received me warmly and tenderly at their house.

I would like to appreciate and thank Dr. Novita Dewi, M.S., M.A. (Hons.) for giving me help, great and insightful ideas as well as encouragements.

My thanks go to Dr. J. Bismoko. Several times in several meetings he tapped my shoulder warmly asking my condition. Sometimes he just tapped my shoulder and smiled but his attitudes meant a lot to me. I must extend my thanks to the head of the

Graduate Program in English Language Studies Dr. F.X. Mukarto, M.S. for his support and warmth, Dr. B.B. Dijatmoko, M.A., Prof. Dr. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo,

M.A., who encouraged me to show my identity by speaking „Banyumasan‟ and to Dr.

Fr. B. Alip, M.Pd., M.A. for his rare smile. I offer my special thanks to Dr. St.

Sunardi and B. Rahmanto, M.Hum. for their effort and critical suggestions.

I should express my gratitude to Dr. Priyono Marwan SJ, Prof. Dr. Melani

Budianta, M.A., Prof. Dr. Anita Lie, M.A., Yunita Linawati, Apt., MSc., Dr. I.

Praptomo Baryadi, M.Hum., Dr. F.X.B. Tulus Wardaya SJ, Prapta Diharja SJ, M.

Hum., Mrs. Maria Caecilia Sri Mahyarati, Mrs. Florentina Haryati, Tony

Cahyawanto, S.T., and Desi Muditamurni, S.E. for their support by letters and meetings.

My deepest and sincere gratitude goes to my super mother, brothers, sisters, and sisters-in-law for their unceasing prayers, supportive courage, and understanding.

I wish to express appreciation to C. Sumardhi, S.Pd., and P. Sugeng, S.Pd. for permitting me to leave my educational work to pursue my degree and to Mgr.

Julianus Sunarka who supports me to continue and to complete my study.

Accordingly my gratitude goes to my fellow graduate students: Charles,

„simpatik‟ Amalia, „Peter Parker‟ Chosa, „Mary Jane‟ Siegfrieda, „supportive and wise mom‟ Thinneke, ‟Solonese‟ Gracia, Yuniar, Siwi, Meylina, Sriyanti, Nico

Garum, Mariska, ‟Banyumasan‟ Josephine, Amalia, Suyono, Trisnowati, Katarina,

Oh Pan Suk, „Romo Koko‟ Bambang Santoso, Pratitis, Dian, and Manupapami for their sharing, support, jokes, advice, and prayers. And to many others whose names are not mentioned here.

Finally, I must thank all those who have taken so much trouble to help bring this thesis into existence. vii

This thesis is dedicated to my grandmothers, my mother, my brothers and sisters, and my dear late father who passed away on March 9, 2009.

viii

Day after day O, Lord of my life, shall I stand before thee face to face. With folded hands O, Lord of all worlds, shall I stand before thee face to face. Under thy great sky in solitude and silence with humble heart, shall I stand before thee face to face. In this laborious world of thine, tumultuous with toil and with struggle among hurrying crowds, shall I stand before thee face to face. And when my work shall be done in this world O, King of Kings, alone and speechless, shall I stand before thee face to face. (Rabindranath Tagore)

Our heart is restless until it repose in Thee. (Augustine of Hippo)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE ...... i APPROVAL PAGE ...... ii DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE ...... iii STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ...... iv PUBLICATION APPROVAL PAGE ...... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...... vi DEDICATION PAGE ...... viii POEM ...... ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... x ABSTRACT ...... xii ABSTRAK ...... xiii

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study ...... 1 B. Problem Limitation ...... 6 C. Problem Formulation ...... 7 D. Objectives of the Study ...... 7 E. Research Method ...... 8 F. Benefits of the Study ...... 9

CHAPTER II: THEORETICAL REVIEW A. Review on Related Studies ...... 10 B. Review on Related Theories ...... 30 1. Marxism in Literature ...... 31 2. Sociological Approach ...... 34 3. Class ...... 36 C. Theoretical Framework ...... 37

CHAPTER III: SOCIAL CONDITON IN THE ZOO STORY A. Class Distinction ...... 41 B. Characters ...... 43

CHAPTER IV: CHARACTER BEHAVIOUR TO OVERCOME THE SOCIAL CONDITION A. Jerry‟s Attempt to Oppose the System ...... 51 B. Peter‟s Action to Keep His Position ...... 56

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION ...... 60

BIBLIOGRAPHY ...... 64

APPENDICES Appendix 1 ...... 68 Appendix 2 ...... 72 Appendix 3 ...... 75 Appendix 4 ...... 77

ABSTRACT

Johan Kristanto. 2010. Jerry’s Class Struggle in Edward Albee’s The Zoo Story. Yogyakarta: English Language Studies. Graduate Program. Sanata Dharma University.

The Zoo Story was the first theatre of the absurd that was made and performed by an American. Its appearance is inspired by the successful appearance of En attendant Godot or Waiting for Godot in France. For the first time, American public does not welcome the appearance of the play because of the unusual format: there are two benches only, unclear topics because they always jump into another one, and the awkward setting where there are two benches only and foliages on the vast stage. The success appearance of Waiting for Godot in France and some European countries makes the Americans want to know further about the play. This study, therefore, is to answer two questions. First, what kind of social conditions in capitalist society is depicted in the The Zoo Story? Second, how do the characters behave to overcome the social conditions? As this study is a qualitative research, close reading is required to analyze the social conditions in the play and how the characters behave. This thesis employs Marxist theory and sociological approach to examine class struggle. This study also discusses that there will be always neglected people in society, how the working class struggles to achieve their dreams, and how the established people behave to other classes. It makes sense that the established people will maintain their position but it would be better if they have a little compassion to others. In this sense, The Zoo Story plays its role as a literary critic toward economy, political, and social life. It is hoped that the play can inspire society to the improvement in every aspect of life. There are findings after conducting the analysis. The first finding is that the social disparity cannot be separated from our lives. Social disparity makes people loss the spirit of compassion. In The Zoo Story the disparity between upper class and lower class is too wide. The upper class who owns a lot of wealth is getting richer but lack of empathy towards the lower class. In this thesis, the writer concludes that Jerry, who comes from a lower class, tries to get Peter‟s attention because he wants to be equal to him. In the other words, Jerry wants to eliminate class distinction in the society and to let him free from his alienation. Jerry is successful to achieve his dream but it must be redeemed by his own life. Second finding is that Peter, who comes from upper class, tends to maintain his position. By answering Jerry‟s questions reluctantly, he shows his position is different from him. His reluctance to share the bench symbolizes his willing to keep his social status.

xii

ABSTRAK

Johan Kristanto. 2010. Jerry’s Class Struggle in Edward Albee’s The Zoo Story. Yogyakarta: Kajian Bahasa Inggris. Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Sanata Dharma.

The Zoo Story merupakan drama absurd pertama yang dibuat dan dipentaskan oleh orang Amerika. Kemunculannya diilhami oleh keberhasilan En attendant Godot atau Waiting for Godot di Prancis. Pada mulanya drama ini tidak diterima oleh masyarakat Amerika karena bentuknya yang aneh: pemainnya hanya ada dua, topiknya tidak jelas karena meloncat dari satu topik ke topik lainnya, dan setting panggungnya tidak seperti setting panggung pada umumnya, hanya ada dua bangku dan pohon yang meranggas padahal panggungnya sangat luas. Keberhasilan pementasan Waiting for Godot di Prancis dan beberapa negara lain di Eropa membuat orang Amerika ingin tahu lebih jauh seperti apakah lakon itu sebenarnya. Studi ini berusaha menjawab dua pertanyaan. Pertama, seperti apakah situasi masyarakat kapitalis seperti yang digambarkan dalam drama The Zoo Story? Yang kedua, bagaimana para pelaku bersikap dalam menghadapi situasi yang seperti itu? Karena studi ini merupakan sebuah penelitian kualitatif membaca dengan teliti diperlukan untuk menganalisa bagaimana situasi saat itu dan bagaimana para pelaku bertindak. Tesis ini menerapkan teori Marxist dan pendekatan sosial dalam menganalisa perjuangan kelas. Studi ini juga mendiskusikan bahwa selalu ada kelompok yang tertinggal dalam masyarakat, bagaimana kelompok yang tertinggal berusaha meraih impian, dan bagaimana sikap kelompok yang sudah berhasil terhadap kelompok yang lain. Adalah wajar bila kelompok yang sudah mapan berusaha mempertahankan kedudukannya tetapi ada baiknya kalau ia pun berbela rasa pada kelompok yang lain. Di sinilah The Zoo Story memainkan perannya sebagai kritik sosial terhadap kehidupan ekonomi, politik, dan sosial. Diharapkan karya sastra ini memberikan inspirasi untuk perbaikan pada tiap aspek kehidupan dalam masyarakat. Ada dua penemuan setelah melakukan analisis pada The Zoo Story. Penemuan pertama adalah bahwa ketimpangan sosial tidak bisa dipisahkan dari kehidupan hidup bermasyarakat. Perbedaan sosial status yang sangat tinggi menyebabkan orang kehilangan bela rasa terhadap orang lain. Dalam The Zoo Story perbedaaan sosial itu sangat lebar. Yang penting adalah sikap dan tindakan kita dalam menghadapinya. Dalam The Zoo Story tokoh Jerry yang berasal dari kelas bawah berusaha mendapatkan perhatian dari Peter yang berasal dari kelas atas karena ia ingin sejajar dengannya. Dengan kata lain Jerry ingin meniadakan perbedaan kelas yang ada dalam masyarakat Amerika saat itu. Apa yang dilakukan Jerry memang berhasil tetapi keberhasilannya itu harus ditebus dengan harga yang sangat mahal yaitu hidupnya sendiri. Penemuan kedua adalah bahwa Peter yang berasal dari kelas atas cenderung

xiii

mempertahankan posisinya sbagai warga kelas atas. Keseganannya menjawab pertanyaan-pertanyaan Jerry menunjukkan hal itu. Keenganannya berbagi kursi dengan Jerry menunjukkan kalau dirinya ingin tetap mempertahankan status sosialnya

xiv

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A .Background of the Study

The present writer was very startled when he read articles in Kompas published on April 19, 2010 and May 5, 2010. The first article told us about an old woman who was caught out of stealing a pine log and was punished ten years. The second article told us about a corruptor who had been sentenced five years only. In the writer‟s perspective, the sentences were unjust. How much did it cost for a pine log and how much money did the corruptor had been corrupted? The comparison between them was really unbalanced and ridiculous. It was hard to understand those facts of absurdity happened in daily life.

Drama is a product of art. It is a literary work designed for the theatre where actors take the roles of characters, perform the prescribed script, and utter the dialogue. From sociological perspective, as a social product of art, a literary work is a mirror of its society. Literature has a strong relation with society. A writer lives in a society and becomes a member of it. He/she experiences and feels pillars of a society: economy, politics, and culture. There is interconnecting relation among political condition, economic fluctuation, and social turbulence behind a literary work.

Sometimes the three pillars cannot go hand-in-hand. The three pillars are conducted by a government but sometimes there is difference opinion in implementing the

pillars between the government and the society. The government thinks that he is doing for the goodness of the society but the society thinks the other way. As a result, there is a tension between the government and the society. The tension makes a disharmonious relation between them which can lead into unbalanced society order.

The author experiences all of those turbulences and pours them into a literary work in order to be known so that the society can take an action to fix it or at least support a movement of change. The present writer takes The Zoo Story for an example. After the great depression, President Theodore Roosevelt launched an economic programme named New Deal. The general goal of the programme was to improve the economy sector. The programme was successful. The Americans afforded their economy booming. It could not only raise the number of rich people but also it increased the number of unlucky people-poverty. It was an ironic situation where the Americans should have lived in an established economy after the economy booming but unfortunately not all of the people could achieve it. There must be something wrong with the society. It is the task of an author to voice it. Sharpened by his sensitivity and compassion he writes a literary work as a voice of the voiceless.

That is why literature cannot be separated from its society. So, it can be concluded that literature is the result of society as stated by Lucien Goldmann that literature represents the world view of a particular group (Goldmann, 1975: 168). Georges

Gurvitch in his essay “The Sociology of the Theatre” as compiled by Elizabeth and

Tom Burns‟s Sociology of Literature and Drama also has similar idea.

To begin with, it is necessary to demonstrate the affinity between society and theatre, taking the theatre as starting point. Is not the theatre itself a social phenomenon? It is undeniable that it represents a social situation, a social gathering; it constitutes a certain social framework in its own right, within which the actors are integral parts (1973: 73).

Many novels and plays that we have are the reflection of certain messages or values which the society holds and we can know that messages or values by reading the literary work that is written by the author. Here the author, as a member of a society, who lives in society and involves himself in social life, delivers what he sees, what he thinks, and what he judges in literary work. The author who lives in the society witnesses the social and economic injustice, poverty, war, development and demolition, and finally giving suggestion for the goodness of the society. From the sociological perspective the main source of his writing is the social context where he is raised not the author himself. He writes a play or a novel not from his sharp and brilliant thinking but from the turbulence he witnesses from the society in which he becomes a member of it. Generated by all those facts he writes his novels or plays.

The author here functions as a loud speaker or a messenger to be the witness mouthpiece as Georg Lukács said that literature is able to penetrate the surface of society, highlighting hidden connections and identifying the underlying trends which may lead to its revolutionary transformation (Lukács 1990: 98). In line with Georg

Lukács, Albee takes his role as a transformer to voice a wind of change to the

American society.

In this thesis the present writer will analyze The Zoo Story, a play written by

Edward Albee. The Zoo Story was written in New York, 1958 when he was thirty and he finished writing it in three weeks only. After being passed from colleague to colleague, publisher to publisher, director to director and no one was interested in the play, Albee thought that the play was really bad – it did not match with people‟s taste.

There was no one interested in the play because at that time this kind of play was unusual. People were used to have a clear story like other stories that had existed before; stories that were written according to the rules or conventions. Usually, the play had a vivid plot, message, and goal but The Zoo Story seem did not have one of the criteria. And the second reason was about money. At that time Broadway and

Hollywood dominated the world of theatre in America and they considered that a good play must produce much money (Amacher, 1982: 13). So if a play seemed produce less money, they would reject it albeit it had good quality. Finally it was produced at the Schiller Theatre Werkstatt in Berlin on September 28, 1959 in

German version entitled Die Zoo Geschichte and won the Berlin Festival Award in

1959. The reason why Waiting for Godot was easily received in France and then in

German because European people were familiar with that kind of play. Winning the award made it easy to be performed in Broadway, New York on January 14, 1960.

The award triggered people‟s curiosity about the play. They thought that there was something special about it.

Like Waiting for Godot, The Zoo Story belongs to the theatre of the absurd.

Theatre of the absurd is a kind of term spoken out by Martin Esslin. Theatre of the 4

absurd is a kind of drama which presents the absurdity of human condition by abandoning rational devices and the use of non-realistic form. It does not portray a series incidents but a pattern of images presenting people as alienated things in the universe.

Edward Albee never calls himself as a writer of absurd plays. The term

Theatre of the Absurd is given by Martin Esslin and Albee never likes the term because it sounds offensive.

Well, let me come at it obliquely. When I was told, about a year ago, that I was considered a member in good standing of The Theatre of the Absurd I was deeply offended. I was deeply offended because I had never heard the term before and I immediately assumed that it applied to the theatre uptown- Broadway (Goldstone, 1986: 771).

…I was less offended, but still a little dubious. Simply I don‟t like labels: they can be facile and can lead to nonthink on the part on the public….unless this is understood, then the labelling itself will be more absurd than the label (Goldstone, 1986: 772).

He also does not agree with the definition of the Theatre of the Absurd giving by

Martin Esslin. Here is his definition on the Theatre of the Absurd:

I would submit that The Theatre of the Absurd, in the sense that it is truly the contemporary theatre, facing as it does man‟s condition as it is, is Realistic theatre of our time; and that the supposed Realistic theatre-the term used here to mean most of what is done on Broadway-in the sense that it panders to the public need for self-congratulation and reassurance and presents a false picture of ourselves to ourselves, is , with an occasional very lovely exception, really and truly The Theatre of the Absurd (Goldstone, 1986: 774).

B. Problem Limitation

The social aspects in The Zoo Story will unveil the social situation at that time. The reading will be focused on the behaviours and dialogues of the characters.

What they do and say reflect their society because they are members of a society.

Albeit they do not represent the whole society but at least their conducts are influenced by a certain society.

The analysis will be concentrated on the social aspects shown by Peter and

Jerry. In order to make this writing focus on the main problem, issues of social status

The Zoo Story are covered. Then, the writer also depicts class distinction and interest as portrayed by the main characters through dialogues and attitude. Besides analyzing those aspects, the writer will also tries to explain the cultural background behind the play using the Marxist perspectives. The study also tries to describe the cultural background of the play besides the biographical data of the playwright. Albeit the conversations in the play indicate their local colour, that linguistic feature won‟t be analyzed as an independent aspect since it belongs to certain class of society, and it will be included in the analysis of cultural aspects.

C. Problem Formulation

Based on the assumption that society can influence a literary work, this study will deal with society at that time and characters‟ behaviour. This study is to answer the following questions:

1. What kind of social condition in capitalist society is depicted in The Zoo

Story?

2. How do the characters behave to overcome the social condition?

To answer question number one, the writer will apply a sociological approach because the writer wants to know the society described in the play with the real society at the time the play was written. The writer believes that the society described in the novel is more or less similar to the real society at that time and the people will do a certain action to face the society either take it for granted or do something to resist it. As the main point of Marxism is a class struggle so that to answer question number one the writer will apply the Marxist theory.

D. Objectives of the Study

Based on the problem formulation presented above, this study surely has two objectives. First is to dig out the society background at that time that influences characters‟ behaviour either in their dialogue and attitude. The writer believes that society holds a central point in forming human being attitude. In other words, human conduct must be influenced by society, norms, or values that apply at that time.

Secondly is to know the response of the characters in facing that kind of social condition. In facing the society, a human being can do two things. He can accept the society where he lives in or he chooses to reject it. This hypothesis arises from a belief that every literary work, in this case The Zoo Story, is a social document which reflects the society and social condition when a literary work is written. From The 7

Zoo Story we know the social condition, zeitgeist, and people‟s struggle in order to survive.

E. Research Method

The material object of the study is Edward Albee‟s The Zoo Story published by Plume Publisher in 1997. The discussion of the study will be focused on the society and characters‟ responses or conduct toward it. The writer will use a sociological approach in order to find the answer of social condition at that time. This approach is used because there is a relationship between society and literary works.

Every society produces its own literary works and by learning them we may know what kind of society it is behind the works. To sum up, every era will produce literary works which reflects the real society.

The analysis basically deals with the main characters and its society in the play. To do the research, the writer conducts library research meaning that the data are derived from many sources such as books and websites. Particularly those books and websites deal with comments, critics, or questions about the play, the author, or the society.

In order to conduct the research, the writer applies three steps. They are explication, interpretation, and description. In explication the writer has to understand and to comprehend the main material object in detailed, that is the play itself. By doing explication the writer reads the text thoroughly. Explication demands the reader to fully pay attention to the words or dictions not to the context. After understanding 8

and comprehending the main material object, the writer steps to the second step, that is interpretation. The writer has to discover the hidden meaning from the material object. In order to discover the hidden meaning, the writer must fetch the supportive items from other sources. The last step is, the writer has to identify the correlation of the play with today‟s life.

F. Benefits of the Study

This study is expected to have some benefits. Theoretically, this study is to show the social condition in America as described in the play and to find the characters‟ reaction toward the society at that time. A different class of society might lead into a different perspective and attitude. Further it is to prove that there is a strong correlation between society and human behaviour or conduct. There must be something why the characters as a mirror of the society does or thinks likewise or perhaps against it. This study also makes a contribution to class analysis studies.

As long as human being is still alive there must be always a class struggle where men are trying to compete to be equal as others either in economic, social, politic, law, and the like. This study hopefully may help people to understand other‟s struggle in order to obtain a better life and help them by working hand-in-hand to promote togetherness. This study also encourages us to strengthen our social sensitivity and compassion because togetherness can be built on these principles.

CHAPTER II

THEORETICAL REVIEW

Literary works are forms of perception of seeing the society-the world. It is a process of interweaving between certain value or norm and human being as a member of the society. Human being as a Homo sapiens uses his ability to think and to adapt in order to be alive. Because they live in society, the society has a certain value or norm that must be applied towards its member in order to achieve a certain goal.

Most of the Marxists believe that economic and social conditions, play an important role in a society. They determine religion, law, and cultural framework. In this place literature is expected to reveal this condition clearly and more even it is expected to improve them for the sake of common prosperity.

A. Review on Related Studies

The Zoo Story was written in 1958 in America when Americans were racing to obtain what was called the American Dreams. The background of the dream was the result of World War II. World War II left America and its allies in a horror condition. A great number of dead people, ruined buildings, diseases, collapsed economic, broken social structure, broken hearted people, and poverty were the most

common scenes at that time. It was difficult to get proper food and shelters. The situation in most European and Asian countries was really hopeless but not in

America. It was true that the USA was the head of the allies but we had notice that most of the war happened in Asia and Europe continents. The USA did not undergo the damage at all. They saw how big the damage was and the cost to restore it. They saw that there were no ways out to overcome this situation but they were really aware that they had to continue their lives.

In the early 1960s a new movement for art and religion rose up. This movement was led by youth. The goal of this movement was to invite Americans to the tradition such as equality. The pioneer of this movement was an African-

American, Martin Luther King. The suffering of the impact of World War II triggered the Americans to get better lives either in democracy, politic, social and prosperity. From all the aspects of the dreams, prosperity was the most interesting to them. They raced with their country men to afford much wealth so that they can get a higher social status. The more prosper they were the more respect they got

(Sammons, 1977: 58).

The Zoo Story was a social commentary effects that loneliness and ignorance are attacking American society. Albee realized this danger to the society thus as a member of society he had moral obligation to make everything in proper. Albeit he was adopted by the multi-million dollar fortune of American theatre manager Edward

Franklin Albee, he did not loose his attention, compassion, and social awareness to

his society (Mc Carthy, 1987: 67). His anxiety about society made him writing the play and he had a moral education to educate and repair the society (1987: 88).

American people were familiar with conventional drama or traditional drama which was first created by Aristotle (384-322 BC) from Sophocles‟ works (495-406

BC). At that time the Americans was familiar with Eugene O‟Neill‟s Desire under the Elms (1924), Mourning becomes Electra (1931), The Iceman Cometh (1939),

Arthur Miller‟s Death of a Salesman (1949), and Tennessee Williams‟ Streetcar

Named Desire (1947). All of the plays above employed traditional drama or conventional drama. Americans accepted those literary works because they followed the conventional drama model, but when Albee introduced The Zoo Story to the

American, they rejected it. They rejected the play because it did not follow the conventional drama model which has been adopted by them for years. If a producer insisted to perform the play, he would have financial loss. Sometimes a producer had to follow the society taste in order to get much profit. It is in line with Vasquez:

The artist or the producer is subject to the tastes, preference, ideas, and aesthetic notions of those who influence the market. Inasmuch as he produces works of art destined for a market that absorbs them, the artist cannot fail to heed the exigencies of this market: they often affect the content a well as the form of a work of art, thus placing limitations on the artist, stifling his creative potential, his individuality (1973: 84).

All of the plays above have introduction or exposition, rising action, climax, anti-climax, and resolution or ending. People at that time were used to the kind of plays and believe that a play should have those characteristics. The sum of the characters was considered more than three. The more character the play would be 12

better because it would make the problem in a play or novel developed and clear. The introduction should be long and explain the characters and the plot. In other words, the introduction helped people to understand the whole story or the play. The last, the ending of the play should be happy ending or sad ending (Hayman, 1971: 178). So for them a good play must follow the rules above otherwise it will be considered as an awkward play and would not be accepted by people. Because of the reasons the appearance of The Zoo Story in America did not have a warm welcome. The play did not have the characteristics of the conventional drama: the character was only two, the language used was farce, the origin of the characters was not clear, the introduction was very limited, the conversation in the whole play did not have objection, the problem discussed in the play was different from the usual play, the decorations of the stage was very minimum because there were only two benches one toward either side of the stage, foliage, and trees (Kernan, 1967: 89).

Before The Zoo Story, the problems discussed in a play were similar to the problems that the society was facing, like romance, war, revenge, love affair, social justice, social protest, power, and the like but in The Zoo Story the problems were not like them. The problem in the play was not clear and strange. People considered if

The Zoo Story was really a play or not. Besides those elements discussed above, the genre of the play was not clear either.

People were familiar with the genre, like biography, autobiography, essay, novel, tragedy, poetry, history, drama and the like but The Zoo Story was not one of

them. Because The Zoo Story could not be included to the underlying genre, people refused it.

The acceptance of The Zoo Story as a play of the absurd in Europe can be traced back in France. Theatre of the Absurd began in France in 1940s based on a post-existentialist movement led by Albert Camus and Jean Paul Sartre. Some people who can be included into absurdist are Samuel Beckett (American) with his work En attendant Godot (1952) and translated into English Waiting for Godot, Eugene

Ionesco (French) with his work Les Chaises (1952) and La Leçon (1951), Arthur

Adamov (French) with his work Le Ping-pong (1955) and Le Professeur Tarrane

(1953), Harold Pinter (English) with his work The Caretaker (1960), and Jack Gelber

(American) with his work The Connection (published in 1969 and performed in

1959).

In The Myth of Sisyphus (1942), Albert Camus suggested that human situation was essentially absurd. It implied a pessimistic vision of humanity struggling vainly to find a purpose and control his destiny. In the theatre of the absurd, humankind was viewed hopeless, bewildered, and anxious. He viewed human being as an isolated being who is cast into an alien universe. The essence of the theatre of the absurd was that human being‟s position in the universe is no sense.

In a universe that is suddenly deprived of illusions and of light, man feels a stranger. His is an irremediable exile…. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, truly constitutes the feeling of Absurdity (Abrams, 1981: 1).

In his essay on Franz Kafka, Eugène Ionesco strengthens Camus‟s statements: 14

Cut off from his religious, metaphysical, and transcendental roots, man is lost; all his actions becomes senseless, absurd, useless (Abrams 1981: 1).

Theatre of the Absurd is a term coined by Martin Esslin to describe particular plays written in the mid 20th century. Theatre of the Absurd has several characteristics, such as nonsense dialogue, repetitive or meaningless action, non- realistic plots or cyclical plots, and freedom of using the language.

The term absurd can be seen from the elements that construct a play. In The

Zoo Story, the plot is eliminated and timeless. From the coming of Jerry to the

Central Park, dialogues between Peter and him, and his death is done in a day. The characters which are two only just spend the day by talking unclear topics. The second, the term absurd is applied to a play that has no vivid goal. Another example is taken from Ionesco‟s Rhinoceros. All the people in a French Village are turned into rhinos except Berenger. The play ends when Berenger, although deciding that all rhinos are far more attractive than human being, he decides to fight against them.

Every literary work is made because the author has something to be delivered to the society and the goal is vividly delivered through the dialogue among the character but it is not with The Zoo Story. The topics of the dialogue jump from one topic into another topic which has no relation at all. So, here the theatre of the absurd want to break through the established of the world theatre at the time especially one in America. That is why Theatre of the Absurd was welcome in Europe but it had resistance in the America. When the Europeans accepted The Zoo Story and people

there welcomed it enthusiastically, the Americans began to think of accepting it before finally performed the play to be seen by the public of America.

The absurdist need to break through the established of the world theatre because the problem of human being is not only about love, war, power, revenge, and social injustice but there is another problem in society and sometimes the traditional drama or conventional drama cannot accommodate it. When The Zoo Story was written, America underwent an economic booming as the result of Roosevelt‟s New

Deal. The America economy which was smack down by the great depression was in booming. By the economic booming the citizens should have lived prosperously but unfortunately not all of them. The character of Jerry shows the economic anomaly in the USA at that time.

Theatre of the Absurd is often called as a reaction to the realism movement in theatre. The absurdists seek to provide an unmistakably unreal experience rather than try to conform as closely as possible the concept of real life. In the Theatre of the

Absurd, time and setting are generally ambiguous, if they are even defined at all.

Edward Albee‟s debut in American literature was awesome. He won Pulitzer

Prize three times for A Delicate Balance (1966), Seascape (1975), and Three Tall

Women (1994). The Zoo Story itself won Village Voice Obie Award for the best play in 1960. It is true that a literary work does not need many awards to be considered good and excellent. Let people who enjoy the literary work appreciate and judge it because a literary work can be considered good if it can influence the readers either in action or way of thinking. A literary work is good if it can trigger people to do 16

something good for themselves and for others. An award is merely an official recognition from public.

The Zoo Story, like Waiting for Godot, belongs to the literature of the absurd because it criticized to what was called „the American optimism‟ (Esslin, 1976: 225).

And the appearance of The Zoo Story in 1958 in the USA was the response of the appearance of En Attendant Godot in 1957 in France. Samuel Beckett, the author, translated it into English speaking community Waiting for Godot. Many plays project the irrationalism and absurdity of life, in dramatic forms that reject realistic settings, logical reasoning, and evolving plot. Literature of the absurd is a term that is applied in contemporary literature to the sense that human beings are cut off from their original religious roots. It places human beings in meaningless isolation in an alien universe (Abrams, 1981: 1). The absurdity of the play seems vividly in the alienated characters, confusing dialogues where we do not know the points, cyclical plot where it looks like going nowhere and have no progress, and hopeless atmosphere. Once again Esslin stresses the meaning of theatre of the absurd.

„Absurd‟ originally means „out of harmony‟ in a musical context. Hence its dictionary definition: „out of harmony with reason or propriety; incongruous, unreasonable, illogical.‟ In common usage, „absurd‟ may imply mean „ridiculous‟ but this is not the sense in which Camus use the word, and in which it is used when we speak of the Theatre of the Absurd. In an essay on Kafka, Ionesco defined his understanding of the term as follows:‟ Absurd is that which is devoid of purpose….Cut off from his religious, metaphysical, and transcendental roots, man is lost; all his actions become senseless, absurd, useless.‟ (Esslin, 1968: 23)

Another definition on the theatre of the absurd is given by James F. Miller. He divides the word absurd into surd and absurd as follows:

Surd in its root meaning is irrational without reason. In the quest of surd the irrationality lies predominantly in the seeker, in the quest of absurd, the irrationality lies predominantly in the world where he wanders (1965: viii).

During that time the USA was ghosted by three things: the great depression,

American dream, World War II, and Cold War. At that time the America‟s economy was starting to climb up after the great depression and World War II and Americans were obsessed about „American Dream‟. American Dream was traditional ideals of the American people such as equality, democracy, and material prosperity. In brief,

American Dream is Americans ideals that emphasize on individualism, hard-working, and capitalism. Many Americans pursued merchandise which could raise their social status but unfortunately more Americans were still in poverty. The comparison between the rich and the poor was too sharp. The rich became richer while the poor became poorer. Faced by the situation people attempted to be consumptive (Current,

1965: 845). They bought things that became luxurious at that time such as televisions.

Television was invented by a Scottish, John Logie Baird in 1926 but expanded rapidly across the world in post-war years in the late 1950s and 1960s.

The Great Depression was a hard situation in the United States of America during Herbert Hoover‟s presidency. It was a condition when business was very hard and many people were loss their jobs. The Great Depression or better known as Black

Tuesday happened in October 29, 1929 and lasted until 1939 when stock market 18

dropped suddenly and rapidly. Stock market prices fell without hope of recovery.

People were panic. They tried to sell their stock but no one would like to buy because money became a rare thing to grasp. Many investors lost much money and most of them came to bankruptcy. The Great Depression led into unemployment, low- business activity, closing of banks, stores, and factories. The closing of banks, stores, and factories made millions of Americans jobless, homeless, and broke. They depended on the government to provide them with food (Wood, 2004: 291-293).

It was the longest and the most severe economic slump in western world.

Albeit USA was the most miserable country affected by the great depression but actually European countries (especially the member of the Allies) also got the impact.

The USA as the major creditor and financier of World War I economically was weakened by the war itself. And as the loser, Germany had to pay war reparations and this obligation caused the rise of unemployment. United Kingdom as the member of the Allies also stroke by unemployment.

In 1932 Franklin Delano Roosevelt won the USA general election for USA presidency. Soon he described a number of changes, known as New Deal in

American economy. This plan was based on increased government regulation and massive public-works project to promote a recovery and promulgation of Social

Security Act (SCA) in 1935. This social security act created insurance for elderly, jobless, and handicapped people based on the contribution of the employers and employees themselves. But it seemed to be failed because in some years the programme did not show up its progress. In 1934 the unemployment was still 60 per 19

cent and became 15 per cent in 1939. Unemployment dropped rapidly when

American factories accepted orders from overseas for ammunition for World War II.

But the Great Depression was truly ended after USA joined World War II in 1941

(Wood, 2004: 386-287).

American Dream was first expressed by James Truslow Adams in his book

Epic of America in 1931.

The American Dream is that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for every man, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement. It is a difficult dream for the European upper classes to interpret adequately and too many of us ourselves have grown weary and mistrustful of it. It is not a dream of motor, cars and high wages merely but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable and be recognized by others for what they are regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position (1969: 73).

In another page of his book he also writes statements that clarifies the goal of

American Dream.

The American Dream has lured tens of millions of all nations to our shores in the past century has not been a dream of material plenty, though that has doubtlessly counted heavily. It has been a dream of being able to grow to fullest development as a man and a woman, unhampered by the barriers which had slowly been erected in the older civilizations, unrepressed by social orders which had developed for the benefit of classless rather than for the simple human being of any and every class (1969: 86).

In brief, he said that all citizens of every rank must feel that they can achieve a better, richer, and happier life. He took the source of his idea of American dream from the second sentence of the Declaration of Independence saying that “all men are created

equal and that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”.

The idea of American dream is the long-impact of World War I (1914-1918).

It was a war between the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey) against the Allies (France, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and USA). The war ended with the victory of the Allies. This victory made the fall of some imperial countries such as Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Turkey and also Bolshevik

Revolution in Russia (Wood, 2004: 301). Albeit USA won the war, she lost a lot of money. Unstable economic led people into a panic situation. People were busy to arrange their own lives. They became unaware of others.

World War II began in the range 1939 to 1945. German‟s invasion on Poland was the trigger. Before the invasion Poland had signed agreement with French and

British military for a back up if Poland was attacked by Germany. Knowing that

Poland was attacked, France and Great Britain asked for help from the other member of Allies. World War II was the biggest, the most horrible, and the most destructive war in twentieth century. There were two main powers: the Axis power (Germany,

Italy, and Japan) and the Allies power (France, Great Britain, the USA, and the Soviet

Union). But later each country from each power tried to look for countries to become their colonies. For example the Soviet Union annexed Poland and Manchuria; Great

Britain occupied India, Singapore, Malay, Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, some

African countries, and the like; the Netherlands colonized Indonesia; Japan occupied

China, Korea, the Philippines, and Malaysia; the rise of totalitarian in Italy by Benito 21

Mussolini and in German by Adolf Hitler (Wood, 2004: 346). It was the most horrible war because of the amount of the war victims and the ruthless of the troops.

Approximately there were 40.000.000-50.000.000 people lost their lives including the victims of Auschwitz, Belzec, Chelmo, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka concentration camps. It was also the most destructive war because of the use of massive atomic bomb and the damages (Hayes, 1957: 811-830). Albeit the USA played an important role in World War II, the USA did not get the damage of the war at all. Much of the damages were undergone by Asia and Europe.

The result of World War II left people hopeless in some years to come. They began to think if there would a hope to make the world into a better one at least into a condition before the war. Experienced the war, the loss of relatives and the loved ones, diseases, and great shock made people become pessimistic (Paolucci, 2005:

132). People saw everything that had been built has come into ruins. It was impossible to build them again as before because everything including money was disappeared. Hopeless and restless were occupied every people‟s head. They became greedy. They became selfish. What they want is to fulfil their own needs in the most difficult times without paying attention to the need of others (Hayes, 1957: 825-829).

People were uncomfortable, uprooted, restless, displaced, curious and started to question many things. This condition was similar to Job when God let Satan to tempt him. Job lost all his sons and daughters and all of his belongings. Like Job‟s question people at that time only had one question: “Why me?” or Why did it happen?” It is a simple question but the answer is not too easy even it does not have any answer at all. 22

World War II influenced not only political and economic aspects but also art and literature. The horrible condition influenced the way of thinking people at that time. People were hopeless and sceptical. People started asking themselves if there would be a hope or a helper to restore the condition. The sadness, hopeless, and scepticism people at that time, was Beckett‟s sadness, hopeless, and scepticism also.

That situation inspired Samuel Beckett to write En attendant Godot or Waiting for

Godot. Waiting for Godot tells situation of waiting but the characters do not know what they are waiting for and whom they are waiting for. While they are waiting, they build conversations among them but the topics are not clear because the topics always jump to another one. The success of Waiting for Godot in France made it easy to be known. It inspired Edward Albee to write The Zoo Story.

Soon after the end of World War II, the world was faced by Cold War. It was a war between communist nations led by the Soviet Union and western nations led by the United States. The United States and western nations have interest to reduce the expansion of communism in Europe because they thought that communism was a threat to democracy.

The Zoo Story deals with relationship between alienation, struggle, and loneliness in commercial world. Albee tackles these subject matters in telling the story of two young Americans men, Peter and Jerry. Peter is a respectable citizen. He is married and has two daughters, cats, and two parakeets as pets. Physically, he is a solid successful man. He is in his early forties. He is not fat nor homely. He wears horn-rimmed glasses which are a sign of intellectuality. He smokes a pipe. He is 23

maybe a member of upper- middle class. Jerry on the other hand is apparently a less successful man. He is in his thirties but seems already beaten up by life. He is not poorly dressed but carelessly. It seems that there is a social gap between two men who come from different class. Like most of literary works of the absurd, it is a satiric play. It satirizes on social injustice and lonely souls.

Albee points out how poverty and loneliness can create division in society.

The scene is in Central Park, New York on Sunday afternoon in summer. Central

Park is a place where every person from every different background can meet together. It is situated in Manhattan, New York. It is 340 hectares and more than 4, km. It is opened for public in 1876 and it is one of the greatest achievements in artificial landscaping. This park is equipped with a zoo, an ice skating rink, three small lakes, an open theatre, a band shell, many athletic playing fields, children‟s playgrounds, several fountains monuments, a police station, footpaths, and bicycle paths.

Albee shows vividly that the difference classes of the society tend to hinder them to get socialized with people from different classes. People tend to get along with other people who come from the same class because they have similar taste and way of life. The way Jerry forces Peter to listen to his order is an evidence that he comes from the lower class that is indicated by his being impolite, demanding, bad tempered and ignorant. The opposite side is shown by Peter who is polite, understanding, self- controlled, and attentive but tends to be ignorant. By showing all of these Albee wants to speak out the important issue at that time that is the 24

difference classes divide people to get involve and to know other people. Every person is busy with their own business. And it is very danger for the society because society is built by togetherness (Kusumandaru, 2003: 60).

In pursuing a social status by collecting many things, people became unaware of the importance of building relationship with others. People became more selfish and more severe. They just care about their own business. To them fulfilling the desire of consumptive instinct was a great satisfaction. They blamed others for failing to achieve such things. There were not practising solidarity and compassion anymore.

Solidarity was a rare thing to find at that time and desire of achieving much wealth was rooted in their way of lives (Wood, 2004: 295).

If we take a look at the American history at a glance, we knew that a large number of immigrants came to America. They came from Germany, Ireland,

Scotland, England, and France. And it seemed that England was the biggest in number. They left their country for various reasons. For example, Germans left their country to avoid war, Irish and Scottish left their country to avoid poverty and absentee-landlordism. The non-English immigrants adapted themselves to the culture of the original settlers but this did not mean that all immigrants transformed themselves into English. It was true that they adopted the English language and

English custom but they modified them to the conditions in America.

The writer is convinced that The Zoo Story was written not only for the society at that time where the author lived but also it can be applied to the next generation to come because as long as human being are still alive the problem they 25

are facing are similar, such as economic contestation among people to be richer and richer, war, corruption, natural disaster, political competition, and the like. By reading the absurd play, people are invited to realize that absurdity cannot be separated in their lives. Sometimes we are faced by such absurdity, for example a person who was very upset because he has been working like a horse but still cannot get enough food and money for his family or a situation where the richer getting richer while the poorer is getting poorer.

The more established person tends to neglect anybody else‟s need. They think that they have become what they are now because of their own effort not from the help of others. So they underestimate people who are not from the same class. In the play that indication is shown by Peter who kept reading albeit Jerry was trying to invite him to the conversation. Peter‟s attitude makes Jerry angry and leading him to speak out a fight as men. What is done by Jerry is a kind of a class struggle in which he is trying to be acknowledged or to be reckoned as the same level as Peter or perhaps it is Jerry‟s peak depression of the circumstances he is facing. That is why he is trying to get Peter‟s attention by making a set of conversation and to get Peter‟s bench in Central Park. Here, Jerry is described as a man who is always left behind in everything.

It is apparently clear that The Zoo Story is a satire. It is a play that satirizes the common practice in society. By writing the play Albee criticizes his own society where the gap between the rich and the poor or neglected people is getting wider and wider. He started to realize that this phenomenon was dangerous and was not good 26

for the continuing society in the future. He saw that people began to concentrate on their business only without paying attention to the need of other. People tried to ignore other people although they lived in the same community. People became aliens to others even for themselves because what they afforded was physical needs only that could raise their status. This phenomenon is in line with Fromm‟s Marx’s

Concept of Man.

Alienation is apparent not only in the fact that my means of life belong to someone else, that my desires are unattainable possession of someone else, but that everything is something different from itself, that my activity is something else, and finally (and this is also the case for the capitalist) that an inhuman power rules over everything (1963: 151).

The objective of Marxism is to build a classless society based on the common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange. So it tries to abolish the private ownership right because everything belongs to the state. Marxism attempts to explain things without assuming the existence of a world or forces around the society. It just looks for concrete and logical explanation. It does not need

„metaphysical‟ explanation such as religious opinion because it is not concrete and illogic. Because the Marxism goal is to create a society in which man can overcome alienation from his product, from his work, from his friend, from himself and from nature and grasp the world with his own power so Marxism tries to change the world through the struggle for power between different social classes (Barry, 1995: 157).

Albee‟s The Zoo Story describes the social condition in America after World

War II where the country was busy with rehabilitation in every sector and gaining

what was called „American Dream‟ (Roudane, 1987: 77). The play that consists of one act only indicates that the author wants this peculiar situation ends soon. The sick society is no need to be prolonged because it will creates more aliens that will destroy human civilization. As an artist he was really aware that it was his duty to improve his society and he was fully aware that it can be exercised if he was fully involved in society gathering. His opinion was based that an artist was a member of the society, a product of the society, and for the society (Mc Carthy, 1987: 87).

The conflict between Jerry and Peter which leads into violence is a mirror of a sick society. There must be something wrong that is not in line with human being and the whole human being as a society. We know that a society is built from many persons or human beings. It means that there are many ideologies, interests, and ideas in it. All the ideologies, interest and ideas struggle to become the prominent representative of the society and the winner usually rules the people but we know better that not every value that holds by a certain society is good. In the play that phenomenon is very clear. It is common in that society that pursuing „American

Dream‟ is normal besides the society urges people to gain them but the society does not know that not all people have same ability and power to achieve that. People who have power and ability will become the winner but those who cannot achieve the dreams will become the losers and will be regarded as the burden of the society. The winners will always maintain their status and do not want to know the difficulty undergo by people who fail to achieve the „American Dream‟. People become

strangers for others even for their neighbour and this phenomenon will continue into alienation.

The title of the play is The Zoo Story. It is not a story about the animals. It is a story about Homo sapiens, about human being. After reading the story the writer interpret that it is a story where human being is inside the cage like the one in a zoo.

The cage here is not the real cage that is made from concrete but our ignorance, gap between the rich and poor, ideology, loneliness and obstinacy. So, human being here is like animal in a zoo that is kept in a cage. There is no interest among animals and every single animal is a stranger to other.

The situation is similar to the society background in the play. There is a border or even a wall between Jerry and Peter and all of them are trying very hard to make the border existed because they think that they have maintain their secure condition or their established living.

The play shows us that conflict between classes where the loser class is trying to set him free from exploitation and poverty can lead into explosion. A person who has lived under difficult situation for a long time or under oppression can produce shocking attitude that can be very dangerous. I agree that it is an absurd play where two people who do not know each other are involved in a forced conversation. One character insists the other character to response his utterance while the other character does not want to be involved in it.

The Marx‟s theory does not assume that the primary motive of man is material gain. The main idea of his theory is to liberate man from the pressure of 29

economic needs so that he can be fully human (Fromm, 1963: 5). Marx also stresses with the emancipation of man as an individual, overcoming the alienation, and a balance between man and his nature. From those explanations we can get a conclusion that Marx‟s theory is a critique of capitalism because capitalism tends to make society fall down into classes.

B. Review of Related Theories

In discussing the theories related to the thesis, the present writer will discuss

Marxism in literature, sociological approach, and class. Marxism is used because it can help the present writer to analyze social changes and class struggle in a literary work. A Sociological approach will be used to see the society depicted in the play while theory of class is used to see the structure of a class and how they react toward a certain phenomenon. The three aspects will be used to find the answer to the problem formulation stated in chapter one.

1. Marxism in Literature

Marxism is not a stream of literature. It is a school of thought established by Karl

Marx, a German philosopher and Friederich Engels, a German sociologist. The objection of this school is to create a classless society based on the common ownership of production, distribution, and exchange (Barry, 1995: 156). The founder of Marxism, Karl Marx is known for his social, economical, and political writings 30

rather than literary works. He does not produce literary works at all but it is used as an approach to analyze literary works. His works Manifest der Kommunistischen

Partei (1848), commonly known as The Communist Manifesto, Das Kapital

Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844, commonly known as

Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 [1959]), Die heilige Familie or The

Holy Family(1845), and Die deutsche Ideologie (The German Ideology) mostly talks about class struggle. So Marx and his friend Engels do not create any theories of literature albeit as cultured and educated people they give great reverence for great art and literature.

Eagleton in Marxism and Literary Criticism quoted what Engels said that:

According to the materialist conception of history, the determining element in history is ultimately the production and reproduction in real life. More than this neither Marx nor I have ever asserted. If therefore somebody twists this into the statement that the economic element is the only determining one, he transforms it into a meaningless, abstract and absurd phrase. The economic situation is the basis but the various elements of the superstructure-political forms of the class struggle and its consequences, constitutions established by the victorious class after a successful battle, forms a law and then even the reflexes of all these actual struggles in the brains of the combatants: political, legal, and philosophical theories, religious ideas and their further development into system of dogma-also exercise their influence upon the course of the historical struggles and in many cases preponderate in determining their form (1976: 9).

From those quotations we know that art is not a simple thing. It has a more complex relationship to ideology rather than law and political theory because law and political theory can be easily bent according to the interest of the ruling class. Those

quotations also affirm that literature is a part of the superstructure but literature itself is not a passive reflection of the economic turbulence.

Louis Althusser views society as decentered, having no overall structure. He says that levels exist but in complex relationship of inner conflict and mutual antagonism. To him art is something between ideology and science, the latter being „a representation of the imaginary relationship of individuals to the real conditions of their existence‟ (http://www.textetc.com/althusser.html., accessed on March 23,

2010).

English Marxist Terry Eagleton says that literary criticism should become a science but he rejects the hope that literature could distance itself from ideology.

Literature is a reworking among aesthetic, religious, judicial, and other representations that shape people‟s mental picture of lived experience.

American Marxist Fredric Jameson regards ideology as strategies of containment which allow societies to explain themselves by repressing the underlying contradictions of history. He suggests people for not regarding literary work as a text only because there are many aspects and representations behind the text itself.

The use of Marxist criticism departs from a strong conviction that it is still appropriate to analyze social problems in literary works, especially those dealing with social changes and class struggle.

The Marxist critic analyzes literary works to show how, wittingly or unwittingly, they support the dominant social class, or how they, in some way, contribute to the struggle against oppression and exploitation. And since Marxist critic views literature as just one among the variety of human activities that reflect power relations and class divisions, he or she is likely to 32

be more interested in what a work says than in its formal structure (1998: 1373).

Class struggle is originally comes from Marx‟ concept of classless society. It is a concept that is based on the common ownership of the means of production and distribution. Marx realizes that the conflict in society happens by the exploitation of the powerful class to the other class (Draper, 1978: 510).

In capitalist society, there are two classes namely the capitalist and the working class or proletarian. The capitalist has capital and means for production while the working class does not have capital and means for production but they use their labour power to work to the capitalist. The working class has no choice because they have no capital and means to product something but they must continue their lives. In order to get money and food they have to work to the capitalist even though they are paid in a low salary. That is the strategy of the capitalist. They are really aware that the working class need money so they offer them a job with low salary and the working class cannot refuse the low payment because they really need money.

Here, the capitalists try to afford much profit by exploiting the working class

(Dahrendorf, 1966: 108).

The exploitation and segregation of the class brings big impacts. The capitalist who exploits the working class feels satisfied and prefers the situation stays like that.

They also feel satisfied with their alienation. They are alienated from the society. In the other hand, the working class feels destroyed, exploited, and isolated from human existence (Day, 2001: 78).

Basically, Albee supports the idea of class struggle taught by Marx but there is a difference between them about class struggle. Marx suggests a revolutionary movement done by working class to set up a classless society but Albee does not. He prefers a gentle way by writing what is happening in society – evolutionary movement.

2. Sociological Approach

The sociological approach is used to analyze literary works based on the social forces and turbulence that create power relationship between classes in society.

That explanation is in line if we assume that literature is the representation of the world-view of particular class in society (Goldmann, 1981: 58). This approach will analyze literary works in the social, economic, and political framework. This approach believes that literature can not stand by itself but it is built by many aspect of life. A literary work must represent the zeitgeist of a society as it is said:

Art is not created in a vacuum. It is the work not simply of a person but of an author fixed in time and space, answering a community of which he is an important because he articulates its part (Kennedy, 1999: 86).

This approach analyzes a literary work not only the text as the material object but also with social aspects. Thus it will analyze how and why the characters behave.

There must be something behind the conduct of each character because what the characters do, speak, and think are influenced by its surroundings-the society.

It is believed there is a strong relationship between society and literature. Each aspect is interwoven and makes a story that is written using plot and characterization. 34

When a writer writes a story or a play, he tries to describe what is happening in his society through the story or play.

Works of art are not closed, self-contained and transcendent entities, but are the product of specific historical practices on the part of identifiable social groups in given conditions, and therefore bear the imprint of the ideas, values and conditions of existence of those groups, and their representatives in particular artist (Wolff, 1989: 49).

He uses his literary work as a medium to express his thought, critique, suggestion, or even his anger toward what has happened. When he does this, the writer becomes the loudspeaker of the society. He voices the voice of the people who are voiceless, oppressed, under pressure, and want an immediate improvement.

If we notice, the conversation between Peter and Jerry seems to be forced. In the one side Peter is reluctant to get involved in conversation but in the other side,

Jerry is too energetic to attract Peter‟s attention by asking many questions. From Jerry and Peter relationship, the reader will know soon that there is something wrong with this kind of relationship. If the relationship among people is not good there must be something wrong with the society where they live in because people reflects their society. Because literature is influenced by many factors so it permits people to analyze it using any kind of approaches.

The sociological approach analyzes the relationship between a certain literary work and its social, historical, and cultural context. So, it is very important to know when and where a literary work is made, to know the life of the author, and to know the zeitgeist of the society that is portrayed in a literary work.

The term of zeitgeist comes from German. It comes from the word zeit and geist. Zeit means time while geist means spirit. Zeitgeist is a kind of literary theory saying that every literary work has its own spirit or nuance. The zeitgeist of this play is a description of situation of a world in facing the World War II, Hitler‟s ruthless, the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, and the Cold War. Facing the damage of the war and ruthless made people lost of hope. They thought that it would be impossible to build this world into the situation like before.

3. Class

Raymond Williams said that class could be dated in its most important modern sense from about 1740. Before 1740 the word class is used for a group of schools and colleges. At the end of the eighteenth century the modern structure of class in its social sense begins to be built up. Then the word class is used in taxonomy. Marx and Engels use this word to divide humankind under capitalism into two classes: wage labourers and capitalists. The bourgeoisie and proletariat are each with its own consciousness and organization (1961: 20).

Garry Days described class to show the divisions in society in medieval; class is based on hereditary. People who come from a noble society have more privileges in a society then it is followed by clergy and commoners as the lowest class. As the age changes class is not depends on hereditary but on social achievements. 36

In The Zoo Story, the division of class follows the division of Marx and

Engels, namely capitalists and wage labourers or working class.

C. Theoretical Framework

Since this study goal is to analyze the society depicted in the play and characters attitude, this study employs a sociological approach and the Marxist criticism. The approach will be employed with other study of Anne Paolucci, a sociologist, Erich Fromm, a sociologist and expert in Marxism, Hal Draper, and

Bottomore. The last two names are sociologist. Those studies talk about social conditions and the people attitude in a capitalist society. Sociologists believe that a literary work is a mirror of the society because it reflects the society and the life of people in a certain place and time.

To support the studies, the present writer provides the socio-political context when The Zoo Story was written. It is necessary to know that Edward Albee‟s The

Zoo Story is an evidence of his concern to the social conditions. He does not only write literary woks but he also gives lectures. This occasion is used to deliver his messages and ideas to reconstruct the American society. This fact is an interesting aspect to notify because it creates certain meaning in every literary work written by him. So, the presentation of the socioeconomical context of American society in the time when The Zoo Story was written will be very helpful in completing this research.

To analyze the background of the reaction shown by Peter and Jerry to fight the existing social conditions which are marked by poverty, alienation, and class 37

distinction, the present writer employs Marxist criticism. The social problems faced by the characters are assumed as the result of the practice of capitalist system. In the capitalist system, human value is ignored but capital is very highly appreciated. In the play we see Jerry‟s struggle to become as equal as Peter and his desire to be free from the oppression of the capitalist. The theory of a class struggle is employed as the main instrument of Marxist criticism to analyze the reaction of Peter and Jerry to fight the social problem they undergo.

The dialogues between Peter and Jerry will be the main analysis. From the dialogues between the characters the present writer of the thesis will make his interpretation and also description on the social condition and the class struggle of the characters.

Besides those studies the writer also applies theories taken from Elizabeth and

Tom Burns‟ Sociology of Literature and Drama (1973), Janet Wolff‟s The Social

Production of Art (1989). Additional information is taken from Alvin Hansen‟s The

American Economy, Henry Mayo‟s Introduction to Marxist Theory (1960), Richard

N. Current‟s American History: A Survey (1965) Those theories are used to get more understanding of the concept of Marxism and all its applications.

CHAPTER III

SOCIAL CONDITION IN THE ZOO STORY

Nooryan Bahari in his book Kritik Seni: Wacana Apresiasi dan Kreasi says that the function of a play is to strengthen solidarity among the societies and understanding human lives.

[Melalui peristiwa teater, pemain dan penonton dapat meningkatkan pemahaman dan penyadaran individu pada diri sendiri dan kehidupannya (2008: 58)].

[My translation: By attending a theatre performance, the actors, actress, and audience can achieve their understanding and awareness toward themselves and their lives (2008: 58)].

Albee fully realized that the society was not in balanced. The gap between the richer and the poorer, between the developed people and the undeveloped ones was too wide. The Zoo Story was written in 1958 when the American economy beginning to rise after the great malaise and it was the beginning of capitalism in America.

Capitalism was characterized with the unbalanced relationship between the owner of the capital and the labour as workers. The owner of capital will acquire all economic sectors as long as his money can afford it while the worker will be the workers albeit they work like a horse. The owner will keep the situation like this because it will give them chance to spread his production. This situation will create a vivid distinction between the owner of the capital and the worker. This distinction will give the owner of the capital a great chance to exploit the worker. This situation, of course, will give the owner much profit but misery for the worker. Finally, men become alienated from others, stressed, lonely, and frustrated. According to Matthew Roudane who quoted an interview with Albee his Understanding Edward Albee, he said that he got the idea of The Zoo Story while working for Western Union. At Western Union Albee worked as a telegram sender. By writing The Zoo Story he criticized issues of human isolation, loneliness, class difference and the danger of inaction within American society (Goldstone, 1986: 773). By his play he suggested the need for people to acknowledge and understand people‟s differences.

The American society in the beginning of 1960s was cradling into recovery.

The effect of Great Depression in 1929 still could be seen in 1960s. When Roosevelt launched New Deal to recover the economy in 1933 it could change the face of US economy indeed but unfortunately there were still poverty there. The recovery did not touch every citizen. The capitalists still became the pillars of the society (Wood,

2004: 209).

The capitalists raced to enrich themselves while the working classes had to work hard by themselves to feed their families. Although they worked very hard, the payment they got did not enough for them. The capitalists regarded the working classes as a means too satisfy their passion of profit (Draper, 1978: 161).

A. Class Distinction

Day, in his book Class: The New Critical Idiom describes class as divisions in society. In medieval society, class is based on heredity. Heredity is very important to group people in society. The structure of society at that time becomes the nobility, clergy, and commoner. But the division is used in medieval and is not common in present time. Today, social class is valued by hard work and effort. By hard work only people can change their position and achieve a higher status or position. The hard work has made them a capitalist society then in turn they will oppose another class. From the first page of the play we can get a vivid description of the characters.

Peter is described as a man in his forties, neither fat nor gaunt, neither handsome nor homely. He wears tweeds, smokes a pipe, carries horn-rimmed glass. Although he is moving into middle age, his dress and his manner would suggest a man younger. While Jerry is a man in his late thirties, not poorly dressed,, but carelessly. What was once a trim and lightly muscled body has begun to go to fat; and while he is no longer handsome, it is evident that he once was. His fall from physical grace should not suggest debauchery; he has, to come closest to it. A great weariness (Albee, 1967: 1).

From the description above we can conclude that they come from different class so that they conduct different attitude, clothing, and manner. By describing the

characters vividly Albee wants to show us the American society in general. It is hard for a member of different class to mingle with another class. Take Jerry for example, if he wants to enter Peter‟s society he has to change everything on him. He has to change his clothing, his way of speaking, his way of thinking, his manner and everything that he has. And even though Jerry has changed everything the other class will not easily receive him because of his origin.

The Zoo Story describes class distinction. It tells us how attitude, behaviour, dress, and way of speaking can be marks of the origin of a person. In The Zoo Story,

Edward Albee portrays the problem in the American society. It is the poverty and the unwillingness of the capitalist class to give compassion to the lower class (Goldstone,

1986: 774).

B. Characters

E. M. Forster helps us to understand the two poles of dualism in characters of a literary work. In Aspects of the Novels he explains that there are two kinds of character presented in a literary work. They are: a. Flat Character

This is a kind of character with no changes of his personality from the

beginning to the end of the story. The character is built upon one single idea. b. Round Character

This character has certain development. There are some changes of

personality along the story. 42

Regarding these two different kinds of character, typical judgment toward a character could be made by considering a detailed description of the character. A flat character will have the similar personality in the whole story while a flat character will develop his character related to events happened in his life.

A flat character is a minor character in a work of fiction who does not undergo substantial change in the course of a story (Forster, 1979: 188). It supports the role of the main character who is supposed to be round and never surprise the readers.

Although Jerry plays as a flat character, he plays a vital role in the story of how Peter and he get along but still his character stays unchanged. From the beginning until the end of the play, Jerry‟s attitude remains the same: rough, impolite, and ferocious.

Edward Albee‟s The Zoo Story consists of one act only and the characters are a few, only two characters. The differences between the two characters are very sharp in economy status, marital status, character, taste, and in the way they speak (Albee:

11-28). Peter, who came from an established community was seemingly very proud of his origin. He was married and had two daughters and his daughters had two parakeets. He never met Jerry before. His meeting with Jerry in Central Park was the first one. Peter was reading when Jerry came to him and greeted him. At first he ignored Jerry‟s remark because he did not know him but when Jerry raised his voice he was surprised and answered Jerry‟s greeting stammeringly. Actually he did not want to be involved in conversation with Jerry because he did not know him and he would like to continue reading but he forced him to be involved. 43

JERRY : I‟ve been to the zoo. (Peter doesn‟t notice). I said, I‟ve been to the zoo. MISTER, I‟VE BEEN TO THE ZOO! PETER : Hm?...What?... I‟m sorry, were you talking to me? JERRY : I went to the zoo, and I walked until I came here. Have I been walking north? PETER : (puzzled) North? Why...I...I think so. Let me see. JERRY : (pointing past the audience) Is that Fifth Avenue? PETER : Why ya; yes, it is. JERRY : And what is that cross street there; that one, to the right? PETER : That? Oh, that‟s Seventy-fourth Street. JERRY : And the zoo is around Sixty-5fth Street; so I‟ve been walking north. PETER : (anxious to get back to his reading) Yes; it would seem so. (Albee, 1967: 751)

If we read thoroughly the conversation we know that Jerry was very upset because Peter was reluctant in responding his conversation albeit he wanted Peter to be involved in the conversation. Actually Jerry wanted to be polite to Peter but Peter seemed hesitant. His hesitancy made Jerry mad and threatened Peter with a knife. In writer‟s opinion Jerry who was depressed by his social condition was very lonely. He lived in a boring society. That was why he needed someone to talk to but unfortunately the one he found did not have sense of affection.

Jerry‟s utterance suddenly surprised Peter and the skipped topics really annoyed him but he kept getting along with him.

JERRY: (Mysteriously) Peter, do you want to know what happened at the zoo? PETER: Ah, ha, ha, ha. The what? Oh, yes; the zoo. Oh, ho, ho. Well, I had many own zoo there for moment with…hee, hee, the parakeets getting dinner ready and the…ha…, ha, whatever it was, the… JERRY: (Calmly) Yes, that was funny, Peter. I wouldn‟t have expected it. But do you want to hear about what happened at the zoo or not? PETER: Yes. Yes, by all means; tell me what happened at the zoo. Oh, my. I don‟t know what happened to me. 44

JERRY: Now I‟ll let you in on what happened at the zoo; but first, I should tell you why I went to the zoo. I went to the zoo to find out more about the way people exist with animals and the way animals exist with each other and with people too. It probably wasn‟t a fair test, what with everyone separated by bars from everyone else, the animals for the most part from each other, and always the people from the animals. But, it‟s a zoo, that‟s the way it is. (He pokes PETER on the arm) Move over. PETER: (Friendly) I‟m sorry, haven‟t you enough room? (He shifts a little) JERRY: (Smiling slightly) Well, all the animals are there, all the people are there and it‟s Sunday and all the children are there. (He pokes PETER again) Move over. PETER: (Patiently, still friendly) All right. (He moves some more, and JERRY has all the room he might need). JERRY: And it‟s a hot day, so all the ice-cream seller and all the seals are barking and all the birds are screaming. (Pokes PETER harder) Move over! PETER: (Beginning to be annoyed) Look here, you have more than enough room! (But he moves more and is now fairly cramped at one end of the bench). JERRY: And I am there and it‟s feeding time at the lion‟s house and the lion keeper comes into the lion cage, one of the lion cages to feed one of the lions. (Punches PETER on the arm, hard) MOVE OVER! (1976: 765-766)

When Peter answered “Ah, ha, ha, ha. The what? …ha…ha…”, he indicated his reluctance to get along with Jerry. This situation is normal in big cities moreover to the strangers. Peter‟s response shows from what kind of neighbourhood he might be, that is why he is trying to be polite by answering Jerry‟s question. In Peter‟s case perhaps he accepts the idiom „mind your business‟.

From the conversation above we know what Jerry has done toward Peter and how it has been done. At first Jerry threatens Peter through his remarks. Jerry‟s attempt to attract Peter by keep talking to him is already a threat and this threat is more powerful when there is a body contact that is done by Jerry to Peter. From the

conversation above we notice that Jerry pokes Peter‟s arm four times and it is followed by giving him commands to move over from the bench until Peter comes to the end of the bench. The last command is followed by a high pitch of scolding and a harder punch to Peter‟s arm.

Albeit Peter is very mad on Jerry‟s attitude, he tries to be calm and polite. He tries to control his emotion because his society teaches so but finally he cannot control his emotion anymore and it bursts up. What makes Peter angry is Jerry‟s attitude whose punches him several times.

PETER: (Very annoyed) I can‟t move anymore, and stop hitting me. What‟s the matter with you? JERRY: Do you want to hear the story? (Punches Peter’s arm again) PETER: (Flabbergasted) I‟m not sure! I certainly don‟t want to be punched in the arm. JERRY: (Punches Peter’s arm again) Like that? PETER: Stop it. What‟s the matter with you? …. PETER: POLICE! I warn you, I‟ll have you arrested. POLICE! (Pause) I said POLICE! (Pause) I feel ridiculous. …. PETER: (Furious) Look, you; get off my bench. I don‟t care if it makes any sense or not. I want this bench to myself, I want you OFF IT! JERRY: (Mocking): Aw…look who‟s mad. PETER: GET OUT! JERRY: No. PETER: I WARN YOU! JERRY: Do you know how ridiculous you look now? PETER: (His fury and self-consciousness have possessed him) It doesn‟t matter. (He is almost crying) GET AWAY FROM MY BENCH! (1976: 766-767)

From the conversation we know that Jerry is trying to tempt (in the sense of to tease) Peter. He does this because he is longing of attention-affection. He has no one to talk to and when he finds Peter at the Central Park alone, he tries to get along with 46

him. Jerry‟s unceasing attempts to approach Peter implicitly shows us that he is lonely. He needs someone to talk to, to hear, and to interact with. In brief, Jerry needs a friend. He needs to build a friendship with Peter, a man that is sitting on the bench at the Central Park but in other side we also know that Peter does not want to. He feels that he is enough with himself. Jerry does not realize that sincerity is needed to build a friendship. Building a friendship is not only about talking face to face but also politeness and those two factors are not available in Jerry‟s personality.

If we read the play, we can find at least five-long monologues done by Jerry.

First, on page 755 Jerry tries to describe his flat and his neighbourhood. In answering

Peter‟s question, Jerry tells the details each of his neighbour including their habits.

Second, on page 756 Jerry answers Peter‟s question on his family life, like parents and girl friend. Jerry tells Peter that his parents are already dead and in turn he lives with his aunt but unfortunately he cannot live longer with her because she was found dead on the stairs on the afternoon of his school graduation. Third up to five it is about Jerry‟s monologue on his neighbour who has a dog, his hatred to the dog, and his plan to kill the dog. The long monologue is the result of Jerry‟s observation to his neighbourhood. He has no activity to do and it makes him bored so to kill the time he observes his neighbours‟ lives. The monologue is meant to attrack Peter‟s attention to him. By telling long monologue, Jerry hopes Peter will welcome his „invitation‟ to get along.

Jerry‟s ability to pay attention to his neighbour‟s custom shows us that the relationship between him and his neighbour is quite good. In American society at that 47

time, where the disparity between the richer and poorer are so vivid people tend to be busy with their own business. They tend to group with other people who come from the same class. There is no point to pay attention to the others especially ones from different classes but in Jerry we see something interesting. Poor people tend to care each other. The solidarity among them is strong.

Jerry‟s ability to pay attention to his neighbour‟s custom can be a result of his observation in killing his time because Jerry‟s life is so boring. The play does not tell us what Jerry is. Perhaps he is a.

Jerry‟s long monologues can be his attempt to open a way in order to get closer to him. Because Peter and Jerry are from different class, Jerry realizes that the only way to catch Peter‟s attention is by building conversation but it seems that he will be failed because Peter is hesitant to respond his greeting. Jerry does not care about that. He keeps talking and punches Peter‟s arm. Finally the conversation is built between them but it is a dry conversation. The atmosphere is awkward and so tense.

The topics are not clear because they always jump into different topics and the topics are about simple things which are not significant at all (Kernan, 1967: 98).

The topic finally is about bench. The bench does not belong to anyone because it is on the Central Park. Because his attempt to get Peter‟s attention does not succeed, Jerry tries to approach him by asking him to move a little from the bench he is sitting on. At the beginning Peter moves a little but when Jerry asked him the same thing several times with bad manners, Peter was really mad. The fight between Peter and Jerry starts here. They struggle about a bench. Bench is a symbol of position that 48

Jerry wants to afford and in other hand, Peter does not want to leave his bench and give it to Jerry. Jerry‟s struggle for a bench is a description of the oppressed people to regain their rights and the persistence of the rich people to keep his established position (Kernan, 1967: 197).

CHAPTER IV

PETER’S AND JERRRY’S BEHAVIOUR TO OVERCOME

THE SOCIAL CONDITION

In this chapter, the writer will discuss the reaction of the main character Peter and Jerry, Jerry‟s struggle to be recognized by Peter, and Peter‟s resistance to his own pride. The writer believes that Jerry‟s attitude is as a struggle in order to get recognition from other classes. In other words, Jerry who comes from a lower class

(working class), wants to lift up his position as equal as the upper class (capitalist). It is believed that the gap or disparity between the lower classes and the upper classes or between the capitalists and the working classes is the cause of conflicts in society. We cannot deny that the gap causes jealousy in society and if there is no awareness and improvement to this condition it will lead into social riot. Our history has shown it.

In chapter one the writer has discussed that the Americans are infatuated by

American dream. The great depression that happened between 1929 - 1939 had made them infatuated by affording many things. They wanted to redeem the economic hardship that made them suffered for a long time. In this situation people who were

strong in economy, the capitalist, would be survived but ones who were weak in economy, lower class or working class, will be left behind. The successful ones will defend their established status while the failure ones will struggle to obtain better lives. The failure ones can only change with a help from the successful ones but in the same time the successful ones will not let them to change. They do not want competitors in this sector. So there always be a class struggle between the classes and sometimes it can be very fierce.

The Zoo Story points out the class conflict between the upper classes and the lower classes. It satirizes the social ignorance of the upper classes to the lower class.

It also satirizes the economic system that is failed to create economic and social harmony. It is true that the economy at that time is better than before but not everyone has a good change to obtain that. There always be left-behind sides in society who cannot afford the development.

In The Zoo Story, Jerry is the example of a person who always left behind in economy progress while Peter is the successful or established one. It is clear that

Jerry wants to be equal or at least he gets Peter‟s attention but unfortunately Peter does not want to get along with him. For Peter, the saying “mind your business” becomes his motto.

A. Jerry’s Attempt to Oppose the System

In previous chapters we have discussed that class differentiation, poverty, and alienation can cause conflicts. Those factors make the lower class ill-feel. This ill-feel 51

leads the lower classes to initiate the struggle. In the struggle, the lower classes want to obtain social welfare that can only be dreamt before while the upper classes try to defend their positions or even making their positions stronger albeit it means that they have to sacrifice other sides.

The conflict between the upper and lower classes can be hindered if the strong and powerful classes have willingness to share and compassionate attention with lower classes. What is to be shared? The upper classes can give their times to talk and listen to the lower classes - giving them attention because for lower classes the situation of being low, left – behind, neglected, and poor has been very painful. They do not ask much. They just need attention, a kind of social need.

JERRY: I‟ve been to the zoo. (Peter doesn’t notice) I said, I‟ve been to the zoo. MISTER, I‟VE BEEN TO THE ZOO! PETER: Hm? … What?...I‟m sorry, were you talking to me? …. PETER: (Anxious to get back to his reading) Yes; it would seem so. (1976: 751)

And about social needs, Draper says:

The working class move toward class struggle insofar as capitalism fails to satisfy its economic and social needs and aspirations, not insofar as it is told about struggle by Marxists. There is no evidence that workers like to struggle anymore than anyone else; the evidence is that capitalism compels and accustom them to do so (1978: 42).

The quotation above tells us that the upper classes fail to maintain relationship with the lower classes. Those failures are: the upper classes pay a small amount of salary to the working classes, the upper classes give no time and space to get socialized to the lower classes, and the third, upper classes do not want to hear what

is needed by the lower classes. The upper classes pay mall amount of salary to the lower classes because they want to get much benefit from business they have by exploiting them while the lower classes do not have choice except to receive it. The situation makes them to undergo the economy injustice.

The upper classes who gain a lot of benefit from their business become the established classes. Because of the established situation they treat the lower classes as means to gain and to strengthen their social status. The unbalanced economy really makes a gap that is taken for granted by the society. The society feels nothing wrong with the gap. This gap becomes deeper when the upper classes feel that they do not need to get along with the lower. They believe that the phenomenon is usual, that there is a working class and upper class. They believe that it is the duty of the lower to serve the upper classes. They feel no guilt at all because they pay the salary. Yes, they pay the salary but the amount is improper and the lower classes have no choice.

They have mouths to feed at home. They have to accept the situation otherwise they will be vagabonds and being vagabonds is more miserable. The stuck of social and aspiration make the lower classes frustrated.

The character of Peter is described as a man who comes from middle-upper class while Jerry comes from lower class. Peter accepts the social status for granted and he is really a perfect picture of the middle-upper class of America. The description of him in the introduction shows the fact.

PETER: A man in his early forties, neither fat nor gaunt, neither handsome nor homely. He wears tweeds, smokes a pipe, carries horn-rimmed

glasses. Although he is moving into middle age, his dress and his manner would suggest a man younger. (1976: 751)

And in the dialogues it becomes clear that he comes from upper class. His habit of reading, having an established family and pets, his residence near the Central Park, and his hospitality-his willingness to talk to the stranger are characteristics of an educated person and an educated person must come from the capitalist. Only a person who has capital can enjoy a good education and enjoy his spare time well without thinking about what to eat for tomorrow or how to earn money for his life.

PETER: (anxious to get back to his reading). Yes; it would seem so. …. JERRY: … You have TV, haven‟t you? PETER: Why yes, we have two; one for children. JERRY: You‟re married! PETER: (with pleased emphasis) Why, certainly. …. JERRY: And you have a wife. PETER: (bewildered by the seeming lack of communication) Yes! JERRY: And you have children PETER: Yes; two …. PETER: (he has to clear his throat) There are… there are two parakeets. One… uh… one for each of my daughters. (1976: 751-753)

If Peter comes from middle-upper class, Jerry comes from lower class. His appearance, dialogues, and attitude prove it. But it seems that his attitude toward

Peter is caused by his depression on the situation he is facing, that is loneliness and a circumstance of being alienated.

JERRY: A man in his late thirties, not poorly dressed, but carelessly. What was once a trim and lightly muscled body has begun to go to fat; and while he is no longer handsome, it is evident that he once was. His

fall from physical grace should not suggest debauchery; he has, to come closest to it. A great weariness. (1976: 751)

According to social norm, if we greet someone we do not know before we must be polite and use proper intonation not scolding or yelling but not with Jerry. He uses high voice to get Peter‟s attention.

JERRY: I‟ve been to the zoo. (Peter doesn‟t notice). I said, I‟ve been to the zoo. MISTER, I’VE BEEN TO THE ZOO! (1976: 751)

In the whole of the play Jerry forces Peter to get involved in the conversation although Peter is hesitant to join in it. It seems that Peter also has no choice except make peace with the situation where Jerry controls it. What is done by Jerry is an attempt to acquire or to catch Peter‟s attention because he is so lonely. He needs someone to pay attention to him. It can be said also that his attitude is an attempt to lift up his low position. He is really lonely because as a lower class he gets no access to build a social relationship with upper class besides the upper class does not want to get engaged with the lower. So Jerry was very happy when he could catch Peter‟s attention although in order to afford it he must lose his life.

JERRY: (sighs heavily) So be it! (With a rush he charges Peter and impales himself on the knife. Tableau: For just a moment, complete silence, JERRY impaled on the knife at the end of Peter‟s still firm arm. Then PETER screams, pulls away, leaving the knife in JERRY. JERRY is motionless, on point. Then he, too, screams, and it must be the sound of an infuriated and fatally wounded animal. With the knife in him, he stumbles back to the bench that Peter had. He crumbles there, sitting, facing Peter, his eyes wide in agony, his mouth open). …. 55

JERRY: Thank you, Peter. I mean that, now; thank you very much. (Peter‟s mouth drops open. He cannot move; he is transfixed). Oh, Peter, I was so afraid I’d drive you away. (He laughs as he can). You don’t know how afraid I was you’d go away and leave me. … and you have comforted me. Dear Peter. (1976: 769)

But Jerry‟s struggle is not supported by Peter or by his compatriots. In other words Jerry is a single fighter in an attempt to get recognition from the upper classes.

His struggle to be free from loneliness and alienation seems to be successful but pitiful. Garry Day in his book Class says:

Everything is produced by the working class. In return for their labour that are given money, and the things they have made become the property of the people who do nothing. Then, as the money is of no use, the workers go to the shops and give it away in exchange for the thing they have made. They spend – or give back – all their wages; but as the money they got as wages is not equal in value to the things they produced, they find that they are only able to buy back a very small part. So you see that these little discs of metal – this money – is a device for enabling those who do not work to rob the workers of the grater part of the fruits of their toil (2001: 160).

From the quotation above we know that the lower classes become alienated people. They are aliens to their product and to their society. If people become aliens to their surroundings it means that they are not free anymore. There is something that oppresses them. The wage they have received is not enough for their lives. They become milking cows to the upper class. In this circumstances Jerry is existed. He wants to wake up our social responsibility to the society.

B. Peter’s Action to Keep His Position

Peter as a representation of the upper class is trying to keep his position on the track of upper class. He is apathetic to the society. He does not need to interfere others interest as long as his need is accomplished. Peter is a typical of self-centered person and he is lack of social responsibility. We can notice when Jerry is trying to get along with him by saying that he has been to the zoo, Peter does not give any responses. Another attitude is shown when Jerry yelled at him informing that he has been to the zoo but he seemed reluctant to give any responses. During the awkward conversation between Jerry and him, he always responds it hesitantly and even asking permission to leave Jerry because the conversation is not interesting and always jumps into another topic. But as usual Jerry forces him to stay and talk. Peter feels annoyed when Jerry pinched his rib several times. Perhaps it is Jerry‟s way in order to get along with him or perhaps Jerry is trying to tease him or perhaps Jerry is so fascinated that he can talk with the member upper class. But Peter is not used to this manner so that he is angry. He judges that Jerry‟s action is not proper.

(JERRY is animated, but PETER is disturbed). Oh, come on now, Peter; tell me what you think. PETER: (numb) I… I don‟t understand what … I don‟t think I …(Now almost tearfully) Why did you tell me all of this? JERRY: Why not? PETER: I DON‟T UNDERSTAND! JERRY: (furious, but whispering) That‟s a lie. PETER: No. No, it‟s not. JERRY: (quietly) I tried to explain it to you as I went along. I went slowly; it all has to do with… PETER: I DON‟T WANT TO HEAR ANYMORE. I don‟t understand you, or your landlady, or her dog…. ….

In those conversations above, Jerry‟s conversations irritate Peter. He does not want to hear Jerry‟s conversations but he does not want to leave his bench also. The bench seems very important to him and it is clear that Jerry wants the same bench also. He begins scolding at Jerry in order to stop his conversation and leave him but it fails.

Apparently, Jerry‟s action to get Peter‟s attention is successful and he wants to maintain this situation by talking and talking to him.

PETER: (consulting his watch) Well, you may not be, but I must be getting home soon. JERRY: Oh, come on; stay a while longer. PETER: I really should get home; you see…. JERRY: (tickles Peter‟s ribs with his fingers) Oh, come on. PETER: (he is very ticklish; as Jerry continues to tickle him his voice becomes falsetto) No, I…OHHHH! Don‟t do that. Stop, Stop. Ohhh, no, no. JERRY: Oh, come on. …. JERRY:…(He pokes Peter on the arm) Move over. PETER: (friendly) I‟m sorry, haven‟t you enough room? (He shifts a little) JERRY: (smiling slightly)….(He pokes Peter again) Move over. PETER: (patiently, still friendly) All right. (He moves some more, and Jerry has all the room he might need). JERRY: ….(Pokes Peter harder) Move over. PETER: (beginning to be annoyed) Look here, you have more than enough room! (But he moves more and now is fairly cramped at the end of the bench) JERRY: ….(Punches Peter on the arm, hard) MOVE OVER! (And he continues punches Peter‟s arm) …. PETER: You are mad! You‟re stark raving mad! YOU‟RE GOING TO KILL ME! (But before Peter has time to think what to do, JERRY tosses the knife at Peter‟s feet) …. JERRY: (sighs heavily) So be it! (With a rush he charges Peter and impales himself on the knife). (1976: 764-769)

The next conversations in the three last pages are still about Jerry‟s attempt to occupy Peter‟s bench. We can see that Jerry pokes Peter‟s arm six times. Those attitudes tell us how persistent Jerry is in order to get the bench. Suddenly, the bench becomes important here. Both sides are targeting the same bench although there are two benches in the park. Bench symbolizes class – a position in the society. Peter defends his chair because he wants to maintain his established position in society while Jerry wants to achieve a higher position like Peter‟s. Jerry fully realizes that if he wants to get a higher position in a society, he has to take over the bench on which

Peter sits on it. He, as the oppressed, wants to feels how to be the oppressor by taking over Peter‟s bench.

The present writer notices that Jerry‟s „successful‟ in taking the bench has two implications. First, Jerry succeeds in taking the bench because he makes Peter stand up and leave the bench to accept Jerry‟s challenge. Second, the present writer believes that Jerry does not enjoy the fruit of his class struggle because he died in his struggle. He just gets Peter‟s attention to him and he is very happy for it.

The vivid absurdity of the play lies on the scene when Jerry thanks Peter because he has comforted him and does not drive him away. How come a dying person thank to the killer? It does not make sense. The other scene is when Jerry orders Peter to go from the Central Park because he does not want Peter to be caught by police. Jerry also cleans the knife handle from Peter‟s fingerprints.

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION

The present writer chooses class struggle to be the focus of interest of the thesis because in every industrial country there will be always the established people or rich people and left-behind people or neglected people. The established people will always look for ways on how to maintain their position while the left-behind people will always look for ways on how to be free from this oppressed condition. The conflict between them happens if the interests of the classes do not fit each other, such as unjust payment, show-off of the rich people, and unjust working hours.

Neglected people are already sick and the rich people behaviour makes them more ill.

In order to be free from the situation, the neglected people do a class struggle.

In doing a class struggle, they pursue just payment, just working hours, and the improvement of rich people attitude. They demand compassion from them.

The Zoo Story portrays the social conditions in the United States of America after the Great Depression and World War II and reflects a class struggle as the people‟s reaction to the condition. The Zoo Story tells how Jerry is trying to build a relation with Peter who comes from the established class. Peter initiates the conversation by telling him that he has been to the zoo but Peter ignores him because he does not know Jerry besides he comes from a neglected class. Peter replies Jerry‟s conversation because he has no choice and he has no intention to leave his bench.

Another reason is that Jerry forces Peter to get involve in the conversation.

The Zoo Story can be considered as an allegory from Edward Albee to the capitalist society which is failed to build harmony between classes. Development in every aspect of life should bring prosperity or mutual relation among people. The fact that there are neglected people must be known as indication that there is something wrong with the development.

Edward Albee symbolizes the human relation between Peter and Jerry as the zoo because there is imagery cage or wall that distracts them to get along. Albee chooses animal as a symbol because animal has no mind or intellect. Animal acts because of instinct but human is not an animal. He acts based on mind or intellect and common sense. In the play, the characters stay on their stand point. For example,

Peter‟s reluctance to move from his bench is similar to an animal which tries to 61

defend its territory and Jerry‟s action to force Peter leaves his bench is similar to an animal which tries to take over other‟s territory.

The Zoo Story brings to the audience a new inspiration to initiate his class struggle regarding to any oppression he faces. It also encourages the audience to question every injustice in society and support the movement to help the neglected people free from the oppression.

Marxist critics have a duty towards the world. It has responsibility not only see the world and describe it but also to change the world into a better place to live for human beings. In The Zoo Story, brings a new way of thinking and enlightenment to its readers about the necessity for a class struggle to achieve better life. It also encourages people to act against injustice phenomena, especially social injustice.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abcarian, Richard, Marvin Klotz & Peter Richardson. (1998). Literature: Reading and Writing the Human Experience (7th ed.). New York: St Martin‟s Press Inc.

Abrams, M. H. (1979). The Mirror and the Lamp. London: Oxford University Press.

Abrams, M. H. (1993). A Glossary of Literary Terms (6th ed.). Orlando: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Albee, Edward. (1960). “The Zoo Story.” In Richard Goldstone. (Ed.). , Contexts of the Drama. (pp.751-770). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Amacher, Richard. (2000). Edward Albee. New York: Twayne Publishing House.

Bahari, Nooryan. (2008). Kritik Seni: Wacana Apreiasi dan Kreasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Barnet, Sylvan, Morton Berman & William Burto. (1957). An Introduction to Literature: Fiction, Poetry, Drama (10th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publisher.

Barry, Peter. (1995). Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Bennet, Tony. (1979). Formalism and Marxism. New York: Methuen & Co. Ltd.

Bottomore, T. B. (1955). Classes in Modern Society. London: Penguin Books.

Bottomore, T. B. (1966). Elites and Society. London: Penguin Books.

Boulton, Marjorie. (1968). The Anatomy of Drama. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

Bressler, Charles E. (1999). Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Current, Richard N, Harry Williams & Frank Freidel. (1965). American History: A Survey. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.

Dahrendorf, R. (1966). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. California: Stanford University Press.

Damono, Sapardi Djoko. (1979). Sosiologi Sastra: Sebuah Pengantar Ringkas. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. Day, Gary. (2001). Class. New York: Routledge.

Dees, Robert. (2003). Writing the Modern Research Paper (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.

Departemen Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat. (2004). Garis Besar Sejarah Amerika.

Draper, Hal. (1978). Karl Marx’s Theory of Revolution: The Politic of Social Classes (vol. 2). New York: Monthly Review Press.

Eagleton, Terry. (1996). Literary Theory: An Introduction. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publisher.

Eagleton, Terry. (2003). After Theory. New York: Basic Books.

Eggenberger. (Ed.). (1972). Encyclopedia of World Drama. Vol. I-IV. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Esslin, Martin. (1980). The Theatre of the Absurd. London: Penguin Books.

Fabb, Nigel & Alan Durant. (1995). How to Write Essays, Dissertations and Theses in Literary Studies. New York: Longman.

Forster, Edward Morgan. (1979). Aspects of the Novel. London: Colchester & Beccles.

Fromm, Erich. (1963). Marx’s Concept of Man. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.

Goldstone, Richard. (1986). Context of the Drama. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Gray, Wood & Richard Hofstadter. (2004). An Outline of American History. The United States Information Service.

Gurvitch, Georges. (1973). “The Sociology of the Theatre”. In Elizabeth & Tom Burns (Eds.), Sociology of Literature & Drama. (pp. 71-81). England: Penguin Books Ltd.

Gussow, Mel. (1999). Edward Albee: A Singular Journey-A Biography. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Hansen, Alvin H. (1957). The American Economy. New York: Mc Graw Hill Book Company.

Hartnoll, Phyllis. (Ed.). (1995). The Oxford Companion to the Theatre. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Harvey, William. (1999). Character and the Novel. New York: Cornell University Press.

Hayman, Ronald. (1971). Contemporary Playwrights Edward Albee. London: Heinemann

Holman, Hugh C. & William Harmon. (2003). A Handbook to Literature (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Iser, Wolfgang. (1987). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

Jones, Helen. (Ed.). (1997). Toward a Classless Society. New York: Routledge.

Kernan, Alvin B. (Ed.). (1967). The Modern American Theater: A Collection of Critical Essays. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Kolin, Philip C. & Madison Davis. (1986). Critical Essays on Edward Albee. Boston: G. K. Hall.

Kusumandaru, Ken Budha. (2003). Karl Marx, Revolusi, dan Sosialisme. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.

Lefebre, Henri. (1956). Marxisme. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Rakyat.

Lichtheim, George. (1982). Marxism: An Historical and Critical Study. New York: Columbia University Press.

Marshall, Thomas. (Ed.). (1978). Class Conflict and Social Stratificaton. New York: New Haven.

Matlaw, M. (1972). Modern World Drama: An Encyclopedia. New York: EP Dutton and Co. Inc.

Mayo, Henry B. (1960). Introduction to Marxist Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mc Charty, Gerry. (1987). Edward Albee. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Moody, Henry. (1981). Literary Appreciation. Essex: Longman Group Limited.

Paolucci, Anne. (2000). From Tension to Tonic: The Plays of Edward Albee. Boston: Griffon House.

Pearsall, Judy & Bill Trumble. (Eds.). (1996). The Oxford Reference Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reaske, Christopher. (1966). How to Analyze Drama. New York: Monarch Press.

Roudane, Matthew C. (1987). Understanding Edward Albee. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

Selden, Raman, Peter Widdowson & Peter Brooker. (1997). A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Cornwall: Prentice Hall.

Soemanto, Bakdi. (2001). Jagat Teater. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.

Soemanto, Bakdi. (2002). Godot di Amerika dan Indonesia: Suatu Studi Banding. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Swingewood, Alan. (1975). Marx and Modern Social Theory. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Wellek, Rene. (1976). Concept of Criticism. London: Yale University Press.

Wellek, Rene & Austin Warren. (1972). Theory of Literature. Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd.

Williams, Raymond. (1961). Culture and Society. London: Penguin Books.

Williams, Raymond. (1977). Marxism and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wolff, Janet. (1989). The Social Production of Art. New York: New York University Press.

, posted on March 30, 2008 and retrieved on February 28, 2010.

, posted on February 1, 2009 and retrieved on March 15, 2010.

posted on June 28, 2008 and retrieved on March 18, 2010.

, posted on January 20, 2010 and retrieved on April 3, 2010.

, posted on August 28, 2007 and retrieved on April 3, 2010.

, retrieved on May 26, 2010.

APPENDIX 1

BIOGRAPHY OF EDWARD ALBEE

Edward Albee was born on March 12, 1928 in Washington DC. He was adopted by Reed and Francis Albee so that his name became Edward Franklin Albee

III. Reed and Francis Albee were the heirs to the multi million dollar fortune of

American theatre named Keith-Albee Circuit. When he was twelve, he attempted to write his first play, a three-act sex farce but he soon turned back to poetry and even attempted to write novels and plays in the late of 1950s.

Edward Albee had a joyful childhood. His parents provided him with nanny, servants, home schooling, riding a horse practicing, and cruising to many interesting places. But he was very grieved when seeing that his mother was so dominant to his father.

He studied at Choate School (graduated in 1946) and at Trinity College in

Hartford, Connecticut (1946-1947) but he did not finish it. He was expelled in 1947 for skipping classes and refusing to attend compulsory chapel. And in response to his expulsion he wrote Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf. The play was believed to be based on his experience at the Trinity College. After he left the college, he decided to take the trust fund his grandmother had left him and move to Greenwich Village. He was able to live off of this fund by supplementing it with small jobs that allowing him to focus on his writing career. But soon he knew that he could not make a living with

this kind of job so he took a job as a messenger in Western Union from 1955 to 1958.

It was while working as a telegram messenger that he came up with the idea for The

Zoo Story. The idea of the story was taken when he encountered real life counterparts for Jerry and the other residents of the boarding house that he described in the play.

When he was thirty, he quit his job at Western Union and wrote The Zoo Story in 1958. His first significant play The Zoo Story was inspired by the works of Samuel

Beckett, Bertoit Brecht, Jean Genet, and Tennessee Williams. He learned psychology of the characters from Tennessee Williams‟ work. It was easy to learn it because he remembered and experienced what his mother had done to his father. He was really sorry for his mother‟s attitude toward his father. From Samuel Beckett‟s works he learned the alienated and eliminated people.

One day he sat alone in his room and he started to know that his family was an example of the theatre of the absurd because they were alienated to each other.

Their marriage was just to fulfil the formality of law. The play made him as the pioneer of the theatre of the absurd in America. After being passed around from colleague to colleague, it was finally produced at the Schiller Theatre Werstatt in

Berlin, Germany on September 28, 1959. When the play performed in German the title changed into Die Zoo-Geschichte. Die Zoo-Geschichte was performed together with Samuel Beckett‟s Krapp’s Last Tape or in Geman it became Das Letzte Band.

The play won the Berlin Festival Award in 1959. The award made its way back to the

United States where it was performed at the Off-Broadway at the Provincetown

Playhouse in New York on January 14, 1960. 69

What made The Zoo Story waiting for two years to be performed in the US because The Zoo Story was an experimental play that was not known by people.

People at that time were accustomed to a play that had many characters, vivid plot, climax, anti climax, and resolution but they could not find them in the play. Second reason was about money. At that time Broadway Theatre was dominated in the US and all of the play performed there must produce much money because the producer performed the play according to the taste of the people.

The Zoo Story won another award again that was the Village Voice Obie

Award for the best play in 1960. Edward Albee went on to win the Pulitzer three times for A Delicate Balance (1967), Seascape (1975), and Three Tall Women

(1994). The other play Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf got a great success when it performed in Broadway Theatre. The play had a great success because the Broadway

Theatre was in vacuum. At that Arthur Miller and Tennessee Williams had retreat from the theatre and the point of view Americans were changed. They started questioning „American Dream‟ and the performance of Who’s Afraid of Virginia

Woolf was one of the triggers.

In 1962 the theatre in America was completely changed. The capitalist who usually financed the Broadway Theatre could not forbid which play that should be performed. The theatre was freedom to perform any kind of play. Many playwrights who has the same stream with Albee rose up like Arthur Kopét, Jack Gelber , and

Kenneth Brown. Edward Albee was the pioneer of the theatre of the absurd in

America who changed the convention of the American theatre. Albeit he did not 70

finish his study at Trinity College, he got an honorary doctorate from Emerson

College in Boston. He dedicated his time to promote American university theatre. He spoke from campus to campus frequently and he also served as a distinguished professor at the University of Houston from 1985 to 2003. (retrieved from www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Edward_Albee>, May 26,2010)

APPENDIX 2

THE SUMMARY OF THE ZOO STORY

The Zoo Story is a one-act play with two characters only in which nothing happens except conversations until the violent ending.

A man named Peter, a publishing executive of middle age and upper-middle income, is reading a book on his favourite bench at Central Park, New York. It is a sunny afternoon. Then, comes Jerry, an aggressive, seedy, and an erratic loner who keeps telling him that he has been to the zoo in high tones. Actually Peter does not want to hear and involve with Jerry‟s announcement about the zoo but Jerry forced him to be involved.

With pushy questions, Jerry learns that Peter lives on the fashionable east side of the Central Park, a place for middle and upper classes. He also learns that the firm where Peter works publishes textbooks and learns also that Peter‟s household is female dominated such as one wife, two daughters, two cats, and two parakeets. Jerry guesses that Peter would rather have a dog than cats and that he wishes he had a son.

And all the guesses are true.

Without any questions from Peter, Jerry describes his living flat that consists of a tiny room in a rooming house, a few clothes, a can opener and hotplate, eating utensils, empty picture frames, a few books, a slot of pornographic cards. Jerry also reveals the loss of his parents. He criticizes his own mother as a whore and drunkard

and his father as a drunkard. He also tells him that he has a homosexual tendency albeit he has sexual orientation to a woman.

Jerry is trying to make Peter understand something about loneliness and suffering. He wants Peter knows the suffering people in his flat, animals that are in the cages, and more about his own loneliness and suffering. The story jumps to another topic. Jerry asks Peter to tell him about his two parakeets. Peter is so angry because Jerry disturbs his reading. He suggests Jerry not to marry because marriage brings much responsibility and many men who are married become burdens to their wives.

The story jumps into Jerry and the dog. Jerry hates the flat owner‟s dog very much. He tells that the black dog of the flat‟s owner is very fierce. Its eyes are truly red and also its right claw. Its fangs are grey-yellow-white. He intends to poison it but fails. Peter does not understand why Jerry tells him the story and he asks why. But

Jerry answers back and said,” Why not.” Peter answers back yelling,” I don‟t understand,” and he forces Jerry not to tell other stories because he does not want to hear that.

Knowing that Peter is getting angry, Jerry starts telling him that he is a permanent transient and his flat is so small, smelly and uncomfortable. Peter becomes inconvenience and asking permission to leave but Jerry holds him. He even tells about the animals in the cages that are separated from each other and become aliens to the others. While he tells about the animals at the zoo he also tickles Peter‟s rib with his finger asking him to move aside. Jerry does this frequently until Peter comes 73

to the end of the bench where there is no space anymore. Jerry admits that he wants the bench and asking Peter to give it to him. They argue about the bench until Jerry threatens Peter with his knife. He drops the knife to the ground and asks Peter to take it and fight like a man. Peter does not want to fight but Jerry keeps mocking on him and pitting on his face so he takes the knife and points it to Jerry saying, ”I‟ll give you one last chance; get out of here and leave me alone.”

But suddenly Jerry impales himself on the knife. He does not blame Peter but he is grateful for what has been done. He suggests Peter to go, to clean his finger prints on the knife with his own handkerchief, and to take his book. Jerry thanks Peter because he has made him happy by giving him attention-affectionate feeling. And after the accident Peter could only say, “Oh, my God. Oh, my God.”

JERRY: …Peter…Peter? ... Peter… thank you. I came unto you (He laughs, so faintly) and you have comforted me. Dear Peter. JERRY: You‟d better go now somebody might come by, and you don‟t want to be here hen anyone comes. JERRY: …Hurry, you‟d better go… see? (Jerry takes a handkerchief and with great effort and pain wipes the knife- handle clean of fingerprint)…. Wait… wait, Peter. Take your book… book… Come…take your book. Right here… beside me… on your bench… my bench, rather. Come… take your book. Jerry passed away after thanking him. And he died in peace indeed. (retrieved from , May 26,2010)

APPENDIX 3

PLAYS BY EDWARD ALBEE

1 . The Zoo Story (1958)

2 . The Death of Bessie Smith (1959)

3 . The Sandbox (1959)

4 . Fam and Yam (1959)

5 . The American Dream (1960)

6 . Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf (1961-1962)

7 . The Ballad of the Sad Café (1963)

8 . Tiny Alice (1964)

9 . Malcolm (1965)

10. A Delicate Balance (1966)

11. Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1966)

12. Everything in the Garden (1967)

13. Box (1968)

14. All Over (1971)

15. Seascape (1974)

16. Listening (1975)

17. Counting the Ways (1976)

18. The Lady from Dubuque (1977-1979)

20. Lolita (1981)

21. The Man Who Had Three Arms (1981)

22. Finding the Sun (1982)

23. Marriage Play (1986-1987)

24. Three Tall Women (1990-1991)

25. The Lorca Play (1992)

26. Fragments (1993)

27. The Play about the Baby (1996)

28. The Goat or who is Sylvia (2002)

29. Occupant (2001)

30. Knock! Knock! Who’s There!? (2003)

31. Peter & Jerry retitled in 2009 as At Home at the Zoo

32. Me, Myself and I (2007)

33. At Home at the Zoo (2009)

Taken from , and

, on May 26, 2010.

APPENDIX 4

AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS

Awards

1960 Drama Desk Award Vernon Rice Award - The Zoo Story

1963 Tony Award for Best Play - Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

1967 Pulitzer Prize for Drama - A Delicate Balance

1975 Pulitzer Prize for Drama - Seascape

1994 Pulitzer Prize for Drama - Three Tall Women

1996 National Medal of Arts

2002 Drama Desk Award Outstanding New Play - The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?

2002 Tony Award for Best Play - The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?

2005 Special Tony Award for Lifetime Achievement

2008 Drama Desk Award Special Award

Nominations

1964 Tony Award for Best Play - The Ballad of the Sad Cafe

1965 Tony Award for Best Author of a Play - Tiny Alice

1965 Tony Award for Best Play - Tiny Alice

1967 Tony Award for Best Play - A Delicate Balance

1975 Drama Desk Award Outstanding New Play - Seascape 77

1975 Tony Award for Best Play - Seascape

1976 Drama Desk Award Outstanding Director of a Play - Who's Afraid of Virginia

Woolf?

1994 Drama Desk Award Outstanding Play - Three Tall Women

2001 Pulitzer Prize for Drama - The Play About the Baby

2003 Pulitzer Prize for Drama - The Goat, or Who Is Sylvia?

2005 Tony Award for Best Revival of a Play - Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Taken from , May 26, 2010.