Tulsa Law Review Volume 52 Issue 1 Fall 2016 Nuisance and the Normative Boundaries of Ownership Christopher Essert Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Christopher Essert, Nuisance and the Normative Boundaries of Ownership, 52 Tulsa L. Rev. 85 (2016). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol52/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Essert: Nuisance and the Normative Boundaries of Ownership ESSERT_FINAUTH_11-30 (DO NOT DELETE) NUISANCE AND THE NORMATIVE BOUNDARIES OF OWNERSHIP Christopher Essert* Abstract A nuisance is an unreasonable interference with an owner’s right to use and enjoy her land. The tort of nuisance must be understood if we are to understand the nature, scope, and justification of private property rights. As the latter task is among the most important ones facing legal and political philosophers in a democratic society, such as ours, the former is crucial. Yet, we lack anything like a viable theory of nuisance law. The two most prominent—the economic view and the physical-invasion view—both fail, doc- trinally and normatively. Things are so bad for nuisance that it has been called a ‘legal garbage can.’ We can do better, and we need to do better. Nuisance law protects owners by protecting their normative control, their capacity to determine what will happen on their land, and protects the core of their rights as owners of real property.