DOCSLIB.ORG

Fundamentals of Real Estate .Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fundamentals of Real Estate .Development DEVELOPMENT ~ COMPONENT SERIES Fundamentals of Real Estate . Development by James A. Graaskamp The real estate development process involves three Basic Concepts major groups- consumer group, a production group, and a public infrastructure group. Each Introduction group benefits from cooperation and a full under- Someone rolled a rock to the entrance of a cave and standing of the values, short- and long-term objec- created an enclosed space for his family—a warmer, tives, and major limitations controlling the other two more defensible shelter, distinct from the sur- groups. A major limitation shared by all groups is rounding environment. This can be called the first the fact that each is a cash cycle enterprise which real estate development. Since then real estate ac- must remain solvent to survive and which must tivity has evolved and taken many forms to meet the create a surplus over time to maintain credibility needs of man and his society. Once based on need . with others. Cash cycle enterprises must continually and custom, real estate is now based on social make assumptions about future social norms, economics and statute. technologies, and the direction of complex changes . in personal, natural, and political conditions. The Real estate can be defined generally as space de- degree of error between assumptions and realiza- lineated by man, relative to a fixed geography, in- tions is what is termed risk, and in an enterprise tended to contain an ~ctivity for a specific period of economy most parties are attempting to shift a dis- time. To the three dimensions of space (length, proportionate share of the risk to others while re- width, and height), then, real estate has a fourth taining a larger share of the benefits. Unlike many dimensio-thqk f~f ~ssession and benefit. This mass production industries, each real estate project can be referred to as ~ space-time characteristic. is unique and the development process is so much The space-time concept is illustrated by the terms a creature of the political process that society has a apartment per month, motel rooms per night, new opportunity with each major project to square footage per year, and tennis courts per hour. negotiate, debate, and reconsider the basic issues A fundamental element in real estate is that any of an enterprise economy, i.e., who pays, who ben- space-time unit has a corresponding monetary efits, who risks, and who has standing to participate value. While many of the value judgments and de- in the decision process. Thus the development pro- bates about real estate projects relate to elusive cess remains a high silhouette topic for an articu- criteria of what is good and beautiful, in a money economy the ultimate criterion is cash. late and politically sophisticated society. The best risk management device for the producer group, which is usually the lead group in the initiation of a The creation and management of space-time units project, is thorough research so that the develop- is termed real estate development. Real estate de- ment product fits as closely as possible the needs of velopments range from a simple cave to the com- the tenant or purchaser, the values of the politically plex technology of the Park Avenue skyscraper. Like active collective consumers, and the land use ethic a manufactured product, a real estate project is part of the society. of a larger physical system programmed to achieve long-term objectives, but each real estate project is The Development Component Series (DCS) is a file of monographs on land use planning and development practices and cases published by UL1-the Urban Land Institute. Authors are practitioners or educators experienced in the component topic. The monographs incorporate the insights and suggestions of a review group comprised of seasoned practitioners on the subject. 1 Contents Author Basic Concepts Professor James A. Graaskamp, Ph. D., SREA, and CRE, has a double career as educator and real estate consul- Introduction Basic Real Estate Relationships tant. He is presently chairman of the Department of Real Cash Solvency—The Critical Common Concern Estate & Urban Land Economics at the University of Land Versus Location Wisconsin-Madison and president of Landmark Research, Linkages, Location, and Cash Cycles Inc., established in 1968, a consulting firm specializing in Cash Cycle of the User Versus Cash Cycle of courtroom appraisals, feasibility, and institutional invest- the Collective Consumer 8 ment. He has a background in home building and land The Cash Cycle of Infrastructure 9 development, and is well known for his work in feasibility The Concept of Property Rights 9 analysis and small computer applications to real estate 10 Most Fitting and Most Probable Use analysis. He is a member of the Board of Directors of the Risk Management in Development Wisconsin Housing Finance Authority, a ULI Research Fellow, and a member of the ULI Education Committee. Conditions of Uncertainty in Development 11 Basic Risk Management Techniques 12 Time as a Critical Risk Element 13 The Urban Land Institute and the U.S. Department of Energy shared in providing a $1500 grant to Preliminary Budget Concerns-Producer Group Ms. Barbara Gallagher, a graduate student completing a Feasibility Analysis 13 master’s degree in Real Estate Appraisal and Investment 14 Approaches to Determining Feasibility Analysis at the University of Wisconsin, to assist the author Regu Iation of Capital 22 in the preparation of this manuscript. Investment Purchase of After-Tax Cash Flow 22 Although this report was prepared with the support of the Marketing-The Key to Development U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE Grant No. Market Research 23 DE-FGOI-80CS 24101), any opinions, findings, Market Data Versus Merchandising Data 26 conclusions, or recommendations expressed herein are Marketing Research and the Collective Consumer 27 those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view The Preachitectural Marketing Program 28 of DOE. Anticipating the Future User 29 The Ethics of Fit and Monopoly 30 Reviewers Summary 30 Jack C. Byrd, Vice President and Project Manager, KINGWOOD, A Land Development Project of Friendswood Development Company and King Ranch, Inc. Houston, Texas Robert E. Engstrom, President, Robert Engstrom Associates, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota R. John Griefen, Boston Partner, Gerald D. Hines Interests, Boston, Massachusetts Alexis P. Victors, Senior Vice President, Western Pacific Railroad Company, San Francisco, California About ULI ULI Staff ULI is an independent, nonprofit educational and research Ronald R. Rumbaugh, Executive Vice President organization dedicated to improving the quality of land use Carla S. Crane, Senior Director, Program/Education Division planning and development. From its incorporation in 1936, Robert L. Helms, Administration Division Director ULI has been interested in resolving the problems surround- Joseph D. Steller, Jr. DCS Editor ing development by establishing, through research, a credit- Nadine Huff, Editorial Associate able information base for action and by using the educational Carolyn de Haas, Art Director process to communicate this information to the various ac- tors in land use development. Based on its experience, ULI strongly believes that research and education, presented objectively, can make a difference and that in most instances reasonable approaches to problem solving will prevail. Copyright 1981 by UL1–the Urban Land Institute, 1090 Vermont Avenue, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20005. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Catalog Number 81-51563. International Standard Serial Number 0276-4970. International Standard Book Number 0-87420- 601-4. Printed in the United States of America. Second Printing, 1986. Third Printing, 1989. 2 also a small business enterprise of its own. Thus, mortgage banker, lumberman and lawyer, city plan- the development process is a continuum of con- ner and hotel manager are all in the real estate struction technology, financing, marketing skills, business. The real estate business includes any per- administrative controls, and rehabilitation required son with expertise in creating and maintaining to operate the real estate enterprise over many spaces to house activities of space users in the years. marketplace. Real estate development also is a complex, collec- The public infrastructure group includes all those tive process, not only accommodating an activity enterprises that provide a network of tangible and within the parcel, but also adapting to the context of intangible off-site systems for the individual space a specific surrounding environment, involving dif- user, including physical networks of street and ferent personalities and interest groups, as well as sewer and other utilities, services like education, limited resources. The political and social process police and fire, and operational systems for deed to produce a real estate product must consider a di- registration, governmental regulation, adjudication, versity of impacts to find equitable reconciliation and all forms of economic activity with efficiencies between who pays and who benefits. of scale that suggest collective off-site action. Note that the difference between space production and public infrastructure has nothing to do with private Basic Real Estate Relationships or public ownership since private companies may The real estate process presented in Figure 1 is the provide utilities and public agencies may develop constant interaction of three groups—space users real estate. A necessary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ABSTRACT the Main Feature of a Conventional Terraced Housing Development Is Rows of Rectangular Shaped Houses with the Narrow Fa
    MAKING A RETURN ON INVESTMENT IN PASSIVE ARCHITECTURE TERRACED HOUSES DEVELOPMENT Wan Rahmah Mohd Zaki Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abdul Hadi Nawawi Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Sabarinah Sh Ahmad Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaQJiTM) Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The main feature of a conventional terraced housing development is rows of rectangular shaped houses with the narrow facade as the frontage. Consequently, this limits natural cross ventilation and daylight penetration into the middle of the houses; and cause for unnecessary energy consumption on mechanical cooling and artijicial lighting to make the living spaces comfortable for occupants. Such inconsideration is mainly attributed to the optimum configuration of houses which offers the most economic return desired by the developer. Passive Architecture (PA) design strategies can make terraced houses more conducive for occupants as well as gives reasonable returns to the developer. The idea is demonstrated on a hypothetical double storeys terraced scheme in a 2.5 acre site whereby it is transformed intofour types of PA terraced houses development. The Return on Invesfment of the PA terraced houses is ascertained for two situations, ie., (i) fwed sales price for all types of house; and (ii) added premium to PA terraced houses due to the positive unintended effects such as low density housing, etc. If critical criteria for demand and supply in housing remain constant, it is found that PA terraced housing development offers competitive returns to the developer relative to the returns for conventional terraced housing scheme. Keyworh: Orientation, Indoor Comfort and Operational Energy 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Housing and Energy The recent public awareness on sustainability calls for housing to not only serves as a basic shelter but also to be energy efficient, i.e., designed to make occupants need low operational energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C
    1 Estimating Parking Utilization in Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Washington, D.C. 2 3 Jonathan Rogers 4 Corresponding Author 5 District Department of Transportation 6 55 M Street SE 7 Washington, DC 20003 8 Tel: 202-671-3022; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 9 10 Dan Emerine 11 D.C. Office of Planning 12 1100 4th Street SW, Suite E560 13 Washington, DC 20024 14 Tel: 202-442-8812; Fax: 202-442-7638 ; Email: [email protected] 15 16 Peter Haas 17 Center for Neighborhood Technology 18 2125 W. North Ave. 19 Chicago, Il 60647 20 Tel.: 773-269-4034; Fax: 773-278-3840; Email: [email protected] 21 22 David Jackson 23 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 24 4800 Hampden Lane, Suite 800 25 Bethesda, MD 20901 26 Tel: 301-347-9108; Fax: 301-347-0101; Email: [email protected] 27 28 Peter Kauffmann 29 Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. 30 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 600 31 Washington, DC 20036 32 Tel: 202-296-8625; Fax: 202-785-1276; Email: [email protected] 33 34 Rick Rybeck 35 Just Economics, LLC 36 1669 Columbia Rd., NW, Suite 116 37 Washington, DC 20009 38 Tel: 202-439-4176; Fax: 202-265-1288; Email: [email protected] 39 40 Ryan Westrom 41 District Department of Transportation 42 55 M Street SE 43 Washington, DC 20003 44 Tel: 202-671-2041; Fax: 202-671-0617; Email: [email protected] 45 46 Word count: 5,468 words text + 8 tables/figures x 250 words (each) = 7,468 words 1 Submission Date: November 13, 2015 1 ABSTRACT 2 The District Department of Transportation and the District of Columbia Office of Planning 3 recently led a research effort to understand how parking utilization in multi-family residential 4 buildings is related to neighborhood and building characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Tips from Our Experts on the Best Way to Carry out Passive House Design and Construction for Your Next Multifamily Project
    TECH BUILDING PASSIVELY 17 tips from our experts on the best way to carry out passive house design and construction for your next multifamily project. By Robert Cassidy, Executive Editor he concept of “passive house” originated in North America in response to the OPEC oil embargo of 1973 and the subsequent energy crisis. At that time, the U.S. Department of Energy and its LEARNING OBJECTIVES counterpart in Canada started promoting cost-effective, “pas- After you have read and studied the text, you sive” energy-conservation measures—insulating buildings bet- should be able to: DISCUSS briefly the history of passive house ter, halting air leakage in the envelope, installing energy-efficient design in the U.S. and Europe. glazing. Once the oil embargo was lifted, in March 1974, America’s DESCRIBE the key elements of passive house homebuilders quickly fell back to erecting energy hogs. design to qualify for passive house certification. In 1991 Swedish academic Bo Anderson and German physicist Wolfgang Feist LIST types of insulation and wall assemblies designed the world’s first passivhaus (the German term)—a four-unit row house that can be used in passive house multifamily T projects. QUANTIFY the recommended heat energy savings, cooling energy savings, and total energy The 28-unit Distillery North Apartments, South Boston, Mass. Project team: Fred Gor- savings for passive house design. don/Second Street Associates, ICON Architects, Petersen Engineering, Mechanical Air of New England, Adam Cohen and Mark Anstey, and Commodore Builders. DESIGN CAMILLE PRIMARY MAREN, PHOTO: 1 MULTIFAMILY DESIGN + CONSTRUCTION SPRING 2018 TECH ‘HIGH-PERFORMANCE WINDOWS AND DOORS ARE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.’ —KATRIN KLINGENBERG, CPHC, PASSIVE HOUSE INSTITUTE US (PHIUS) Perch Harlem, at 542 West 153rd Street, New York, designed by Chris Benedict, RA, for Synops Capital Partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Real Estate Development
    For the non real estate professional An introductory case study of the building of a Transit Oriented Development Views from For Profit vs. Non-Profit Developers For Profit Developer Non-Profit Developer FAR- Floor area ratio, the ratio of square footage of building to square footage of land Entitlements- All federal, state and local approvals and permits required to develop project. Building Coverage- the ration of the building footprint to the square footage of the development parcel Parking Ratio- Parking spaces required per residential unit or square feet of commercial space. Capital Stack- Equity, finance and grants required to fund project Net Operating Income- The net of rental revenue after operating expense, before debt service Operating Expense- Ongoing costs for the property including management, maintenance, insurance, taxes, marketing, etc. Debt Service Coverage- The ratio of net operating income allowed to service the debt of the project. Hard Costs- Site work and vertical construction cost of development Soft Costs- Architectural\engineering\legal\marketing\permitting\ finance\ and project management costs of development. Reserves- Escrow accounts established for interest, operating deficits, and capital improvements. Tax Credits- (LIHTC) Income tax credits created through the development of qualified low income housing developments. Tax credits are sold to investors and used for equity for development. Soft Loans- Loans or grants available to non profit developers used for the pursuit of low income housing developments. Newburyport MBTA Commuter Rail Station, Newburyport , MA The property consists of five parcels of land that total approximately 11.11 acres of land adjacent to the MBTA Newburyport Commuter Rail Station. The property is bounded by business/industrial uses on the west and north, a private garage and MBTA commuter parking on the south, and the rail right-of-way and Station on the east with retail use on the other side of the tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculation of Owner-Occupied Dwelling Services In
    Calculation of Owner-Occupied Dwelling Services in Georgia Abstract Output of owner-occupied dwellings (OOD) is included within the production boundary according to the System of National Accounts. Different methods may be selected for measuring OOD services due to housing market development level. The paper presents estimation of services produced by OODs based on a User Cost Method, which replaced a self-assessment method in 2019 year in the National Accounts of Georgia during the general revision of time series. Key words: Owner-Occupied Dwellings, Imputed rent, User Cost Method Author: Levan Karsaulidze – Head of National Accounts Department, National Statistics Office of Georgia Introduction Imputed rents, representing services produced by owner-occupied dwellings (OOD), has always been included within the production boundary of National Account and are part of the official GDP estimates of Georgia as well. In 2019 transition to the SNA 2008 was implemented1 in the National Accounts of Georgia from the SNA 1993, accompanied with a general revision of time series. Along with other major changes related to the newly adopted methodology, user-cost method was implemented for measuring imputed rents for owner occupied houses, while self-assessment method was used until 2019 year. The paper describes a methodological background and detailed calculation steps for measuring imputed rents of OODs in Georgia, based on the user-cost method, briefly summarizes widely used approaches for estimating services of OODs and provides arguments for adopting the use-cost method for the country. Final results are presented in the last part of the paper. 1. Methodological Framework Methodology for measuring imputed rents of owner-occupied dwellings differs by country based on a rental market development level.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Area Plan
    CHAPTER 6 RESIDENTIAL AREA PLAN Brentwood’s residential neighborhoods are one of the most The Objectives identified in the Residential Area Plan are significant contributors to its unique character and identity . intended to: Throughout the planning process residents expressed their vision and concerns for the City’s residential areas . The Res- • Maintain Brentwood’s character and identity idential Area Plan builds on public input and the future Land • Ensure quality housing stock remains a staple of the Use & Development Plan to provide policies and recommen- community dations as well as further define the type and location of each • Maintain the optimal balance of housing types within the residential land use . The location of each residential land use community is illustrated in the Residential Area Plan . • Ensure compatibility between the City’s commercial areas and its residential neighborhoods • Ensure compatibility between infill and existing residential development • Encourage a diversity of housing types, sizes and prices 60 Comprehensive Plan | Brentwood RESIDENTIAL LAND USE PLAN 170 RICHMOND HEIGHTS 64 40 EAGER RD 64 40 LADUE BRENTWOOD Wrenwood Ln FOREST Middlesex Dr Middlesex CONDOMINIUMS THE VILLAS AT BRENTWOOD STRASSNER DR HANLEY STATION Pine Ave MCKNIGHT RD MCKNIGHT Sonora Ave HIGH SCHOOL DR SCHOOL HIGH MEMORIAL PARK BRENTWOOD MAPLEWOOD Saint Clair Ave Clair Saint Park Ridge Ave Ridge Park BRENTWOOD POLICE MIDDLE & Bridgeport Ave DEPARTMENT HIGH Hanley Industrial Ct MT. CALVARY White Ave LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL Rosalie Ave MCGRATH Harrison Ave CITY ELEMENTARY HALL BROUGHTON PARK LITZSINGER RD Eulalie Ave BRENTWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT MARK TWAIN ELEMENTARY HANLEYRD Annalee Ave Dorothy Ave Kentland Dr Joseph Ave OAK Bremerton Rd ROGERS TREE ROCK HILL Madge Ave BRENTWOODBLVD PARKWAY PARK Powell Ave ST.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Analysis of Constraints to Housing
    CITY OF OAKLAND HOUSING ELEMENT 2015- 2023 6. ANALYSIS OF CONSTRAINTS TO HOUSING A. GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Governmental policies and regulations can have both positive and negative effects on the availability and affordability of housing and supportive services. This chapter of the Housing Element describes the policies and strategies that provide incentives for housing in Oakland that have resulted in significant contributions to the City’s housing stock. This chapter also analyzes City policies and regulations that could potentially constrain the City’s abilities to achieve its housing objectives. Constraints to housing can include land use controls, development standards, infrastructure requirements, residential development fees, and development approval processes, along with non-governmental constraints such as financing. A brief discussion of the City’s policy and regulatory context is presented below. Since 1998, the City of Oakland has undertaken actions to reduce the impact of local government regulations and fees on the cost and availability of housing. Beginning with the General Plan update in 1998, the City has: • increased residential densities, • created new mixed-use housing opportunities along major transportation corridors and in the downtown, • reduced open space requirements in high density residential zones in the Downtown and in the Transit Oriented Development Zone (S-15), • streamlined the environmental review process for downtown projects, • adopted a Density Bonus Ordinance, • adopted a secondary unit ordinance and streamlined the process for approval, • created new fast-track and streamlined permit processes, and • adopted Standard Conditions of Approval to, in part, streamline the CEQA review process. Land Use Policies and Regulations Discretionary land use control in Oakland is exercised by the Planning Commission and the City Council, and administered by the Planning and Building Department, Bureau of Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) to the Real Estate Development Process Using Modular Construction Methods
    Application of the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) to the Real Estate Development Process using Modular Construction Methods By Steven V. Bonelli AND Adrian M. Gonzale z Gue rra B.S., Business Administration, 2000 B.S., Industrial Engineering, 2006 University of Vermont Northwe stern University Maste r of Business Administration, 2011 University of Michigan Submitted to the Program in Real Estate Development in Conjunction with the Center for Real Estate in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 2012 ©2012 Steven V. Bonelli, Adrian M. Gonzalez Guerra All rights reserved The authors hereby grant to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author_________________________________________________________ (Steven V. Bonelli) Center for Real Estate July 30, 2012 Signature of Author_________________________________________________________ (Adrian M. Gonzale z Gue rra) Ce nter for Real Estate July 30, 2012 Certified by_______________________________________________________________ Steven D. Eppinger Professor of Management Science and Innovation Sloan School of Management Thesis Supervisor Accepted by______________________________________________________________ David Ge ltne r Chair, MSRED Committee Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development This page intentionally left
    [Show full text]
  • 20.17.000 Building Size and Floor Area Regulations
    20.17.000 BUILDING SIZE AND FLOOR AREA REGULATIONS 20.17.010 MINIMUM REQUIRED. Any building intended in whole or part for residential purposes shall provide a minimum floor area, and basement or utility area as hereinafter specified by the regulations for the District in which such building is located. A. The minimum floor requirement for residential use shall be based upon the number of bedrooms, as defined by the Building Code, and total rooms, as defined by the Building Code exclusive of bathrooms, and is stated in terms of the total useable residential floor area required per family on a single floor level. B. In any district which requires minimum floor area for purposes and an attached garage requirement (sic), the district may credit a portion of the garage area toward the required minimum floor area. Carports shall not be so credited nor garages built at a basement level. C. In the case of any residential building which has more than a single floor level, the total of all liveable floor area which is not over any other liveable floor area shall be called the First Floor Area, and shall conform to the required minimum total floor area, except that the required First Floor Area may be reduced, to any further minimum as established and in proportion to an increase in total liveable floor area as set forth in the individual district regulations. 1. The individual district regulations may allow that a percentage of any such increase in total liveable floor area may be unfinished floor space capable under the Building Code or this Ordinance below of being finished to liveable floor area, provided such unfinished area is in the second story of a two story home as defined on the fold-out chart, (see 20.33.000.) In addition to requirements of the Building Code, such space shall meet the following requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of New Methodology to Assess Effectiveness of Low-Rise Housing Construction
    Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 38 Trends of Technologies and Innovations in Economic and Social Studies (TTIESS 2017) Development of New Methodology to Assess Effectiveness of Low-rise Housing Construction Filiushina Kristina, Gusakova Nataliia, Minaev Nikolai Dobrinina Olga Department of Natural Resources Economics Department of Economics and Urban Management National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building Department of Economics and Urban Management Tomsk, Russia. Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building E-mail: [email protected] Tomsk, Russia. Abstract — The given paper presents the new method to government is involved in such kind of projects due to the assess the effectiveness of low-rise housing projects based on the reason that they solve the problems of housing availability, re- public-private partnership principles. The basic indicators of settlement and demolishing of rundown and substandard low-rise housing project effectiveness were defined. The possible housing. Moreover, these projects attract private investments options for the mentioned projects implementation were into rural territories development. In this regard assessment of considered. The algorithm was suggested to assess the these projects effectiveness is required. effectiveness of low-rise housing project based on the public- private partnership principles. II. LITERATURE REVIEW Keywords — effectiveness; assessment; low-rise housing; The issue of low-rise housing construction development public-private partnership; quality was studied by many researchers, for instance V.S. Kazeikin, S.A. Baronin, A.G. Chernykh, A.N. Androsov considered the I. INTRODUCTION basic problems of low-rise housing construction development Currently, complex construction of low-rise residential in Russia [1].
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHITECTURAL STYLES & TYPES a Residential Home Designer Has
    ARCHITECTURAL STYLES & TYPES A residential home designer has four basic designs to choose from when designing homes: the one- story or ranch, the one-and-one-half-story, the two-story, and the split-level. Each of these individual styles has strengths and weaknesses that should be considered before making a design choice. Factors such as space available for the house, site contour, climate, convenience, cost surroundings, and personal preference and needs play a role in the decision process. One-Story Ranch Advantages 1. Lends itself beautifully to indoor- outdoor living (patios, porches, etc.) 2. Absence of stairs, unless it has a basement 3. Low-pitched roof and short walls make outside maintenance easy Disadvantages 1. Usually more costly to build 2. Requires a larger lot than a two story of the same square footage 3. Possible heating problems One-and-One-Half-Story Advantages 1. Steeper roof, which allows for future expansion 2. Dormers are usually added, which provides additional light and ventilation 3. Heating costs are minimal due to the small outside wall area Disadvantages 1. Adequate ventilation and insulation is a must since 1/3 of the ceiling area is under the roof. 2. Must be precisely planned out so as to accommodate for everyone. Two-Story Advantage 1. Most economical to build 2. Requires a smaller lot than most other designs 3. Heating and Cooling is very economical Disadvantage 1. Stands out amongst other designs 2. Exterior maintenance is generally more costly and difficult 3. Climbing stairs 4. Does not lend itself to variations in designs as easily as other house designs Split-Level Advantages 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Benefits of Constructing a Residential House with a Heart of Cold-Formed Steel
    EPiC Series in Education Science Education Volume 1, 2017, Pages 288{296 Science AUBEA 2017: Australasian Universities Build- ing Education Association Conference 2017 Understanding the Benefits of Constructing a Residential House with a Heart of Cold-Formed Steel Vidal P. Paton-Cole1 and Emad F. Gad2 1 University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia 2 Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Constructing residential houses with cold-formed steel in Australia dates back to the 1940’s when there was a shortage of timber for use in the industry. This subsequently led to the formation of the National Association of Steel-Framed Housing (NASH) in 1982 with the objective of promoting the use of cold-formed steel in the construction industry, in particular for application to construction of low-rise residential houses. Over the last few decades, NASH has made significant progress in promoting steel and has led to the inclusion of steel-framed housing in the Building Code of Australia (BCA) and the development of a standard on residential and low-rise steel framing. Conventional detached housing is the largest single form of residential construction in Australia with approximately 120,000 built in 2015. Therefore, the safety, durability, performance and long-term low operational costs over the 50-year design life of a typical residential house are of significance. Constructed residential houses satisfying these requirements would not only translate to significant savings to homeowners personally but also to the nation. This paper discusses the benefits of using cold-formed steel for constructing low-rise residential structures.
    [Show full text]