Botanist Interior 40.1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Botanist Interior 40.1 2001 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 3 THE RARE PLANTS OF FORT MCCOY MILITARY RESERVATION, MONROE COUNTY, WISCONSIN Mark K. Leach The Nature Conservancy, Wisconsin Field Office 333 West Mifflin Street Madison, Wisconsin 53703 ABSTRACT Fort McCoy Military Reservation is a 24,180 ha United States Army training facility in west-cen- tral Wisconsin. In 1991 and 1992 I conducted the first extensive survey at the fort for rare vascular plants, documenting 89 stations of 14 species including four Wisconsin threatened and 10 Wisconsin watch-list species. Two species, bog bluegrass (Poa paludigena) and fame flower (Talinum ru- gospermum), were also listed as United States Fish and Wildlife Service Category 2; large popula- tions of these grow at the fort. One formerly documented species, the Wisconsin endangered rough white lettuce (Prenanthes aspera), was apparently extirpated. I briefly describe my observations on population size, habitat and apparent threats. For convenience of reporting, the rare plants are dis- cussed in an upland group (Artemisia dracunculus, Asclepias ovalifolia, Gentiana flavida, Opuntia fragilis, Polytaenia nuttallii, Solidago sciaphila, and Talinum rugospermum) and a lowland (or wet- land) group (Bartonia virginica, Carex folliculata, Poa paludigena, Polygala cruciata, Rhexia vir- ginica, Scleria triglomerata, and Thelypteris simulata). Generally, rare plant conservation appears to be compatible with military training: both benefit from restoring and maintaining semi-open, sa- vanna-like upland landscapes and preventing activities which would damage wetlands. INTRODUCTION Fort McCoy Military Reservation is an installation of the United States Army located in Monroe County, Wisconsin (Figure 1). The primary mission of the Fort is to serve as a facility for military training. Training first began on Major General Robert Bruce McCoy’s ranch in 1905. The army bought 5,750 ha in 1909 and has since used the facility more or less constantly. Currently more than 100,000 people train there annually. The fort now occupies 24,180 ha, of which 23,358 ha are classified as “unimproved.” The facility lies south of the Tension Zone (Curtis 1959) within the Driftless Area (Figure 1), an unglaciated region of geologically ancient, highly eroded, steep-sloped, sandstone hills with narrow ridges and broad valleys. Prior to Euro-American settlement, the generally thin upland soils supported vegetation described by Hole & Germain (1994) as “largely oak savanna, with patches of oak forest. Some white pine (Pinus strobus) and red pine (P. resinosa) were pre- sent on favorable exposures and on coarse-textured soils. The savanna was com- posed of bur, white, black, and Hill’s oaks (Quercus macrocarpa, Q. alba, Q. ve- lutina, and Q. ellipsoidalis) in a matrix of prairie grasses and forbs.” The Present address: University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum, 1207 Seminole Highway, Madison WI 53711-3728. E-mail: [email protected] 4 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST Vol. 40 FIGURE 1. Fort McCoy Military Reservation (black) is located in Monroe County, Wisconsin within the Driftless Area (dotted lines), west of the ancient bed of Glacial Lake Wis- consin (gray), and south of the Tension Zone (dashed lines; Curtis 1959). The size of the fort averages about 25 km north to south and 8 to 10 km east to west, Latitude 43° 54’ to 44° 9′ North, Longitude 90° 36′ to 90° 46′ West. nutrient-poor drought-prone soil, the short growing season, and common wild fires combine to maintain much of the savanna-like character of the uplands. However, many areas now are presumably more densely timbered than at settle- ment. Some of the valleys contain extensive wetlands on soils varying from sand to muck. Existing wetland communities include hardwood swamp, wet prairie, 2001 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 5 sedge meadow, Sphagnum bog, shrub-carr, tamarack (Larix laricina) swamp, and emergent aquatic marsh. The fort contains 10 major and 10 tributary streams, totaling 17.7 km in length. They are cold, fast-flowing, spring-fed, and sandy-bottomed. Trainers restrict military equipment, for the most part, from wetlands and streams. Annual normal precipitation is 79 cm (Fort McCoy 1983). The Mauston weather station, which is about 48 km east-southeast of Fort McCoy, reports 84 cm of mean average annual precipitation, with most falling in summer (30 cm). They also report that the area has an average summer temperature of 20° C and average winter temperature of –8° C, with extremes of 39° C to –38° C. Median last and first frost dates are May 15 and September 26. The year-to-year varia- tion of weather parameters is considerable. Like many other military installa- tions, Fort McCoy has preserved rare species and communities, including what is likely the largest metapopulation of the federally endangered Karner blue but- terfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis; Leach 1993a, Bleser 1993). Other rare ani- mals found at the fort include the phlox moth (Shinia indiana; Maxwell & Ferge 1994, Kirk 1994) and the slender glass lizard (Ophisaurua attenuatus; Nedrelo 1994). Fort McCoy’s Natural Resource Management Division (NRMD) contracted with The Nature Conservancy-Wisconsin Field Office to survey the fort for rare plants. During the growing seasons of 1991 and 1992 I surveyed for populations of vascular plants listed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources as Endangered, Threatened, or Watch and plants listed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service as “Category Two.” State and federal agencies are consid- ering “Watch” and “Category Two” species, respectively, for protection as Threatened or Endangered. No plant species currently listed as federally endan- gered or threatened were thought to occur on the fort. Here I give a condensed and revised version of my rare plant survey report (Leach 1993b). I conclude this paper by discussing the challenges for continued plant conservation in the midst of a heavily used military training facility. METHODS Within the boundaries of Fort McCoy, I conducted status surveys for rare plant species. Fourteen such species had previously been reported as growing on the fort. I resurveyed their historic locations (if known) as well as other likely habitats. I worked full-time throughout most of the growing season in 1991 and 1992, alternating this survey with surveys for the Karner blue butterfly (Leach 1993a) and its host plant, wild lupine (Lupinus perennis). I surveyed most portions of the fort except the “hot” North Impact Area—a 2100-ha target area for live ammunition. For each population encoun- tered I mapped the location and recorded the population size, extent, habitat, associated species, and possible threats. The names of tentatively identified specimens were verified by Theodore Cochrane, Curator, University of Wisconsin Herbarium, Madison and by other herbarium staff. Robert Freckmann, Uni- versity of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, helped name numerous grass specimens. Nomenclature follows Gleason & Cronquist (1991). 6 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST Vol. 40 RESULTS I increased the number of known rare plant stations (Table 1) from 27 to 89. Of those populations, 48 were fame flower (Talinum rugospermum). I verified the presence of thirteen previously reported rare plant species and I documented one new species: dragon’s sagewort (Artemisia dracunculus). I did not find five previously reported species: large water starwort (Callitriche heterophylla), tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia cespitosa), large-leaved avens (Geum macrophyl- lum), rough white lettuce (Prenanthes aspera), and silky willow (Salix sericea). Of these, only the record of rough white lettuce, which was made in 1981, was supported by a clearly identifiable specimen (Bever, WIS). Without good speci- mens, the other reports are questionable. For convenience, the findings are presented in two groups: upland species and lowland species (Table 1). The upland species are geographically centered on the Great Plains or the Midwest and the lowland species are geographically related to eastern North America. Each species’ summary includes a description of population size and habitat at the fort. Herbarium specimens that I collected or examined are indicated parenthetically. I. Upland Species The fort’s extensive oak and jack-pine (Pinus banksiana) savannas, dry prairies, and sandstone outcrops supported seven rare plant species. Clearly, the most widespread and abundant of the rare plants at the fort was the fame flower (Talinum rugospermum: Portulacaceae). This small, fleshy-leafed, perennial herb grows in the upper Midwest, Nebraska, Kansas, and east Texas, but is most common in western and central Wisconsin (Cochrane 1993). I found populations in four previously reported locations and in 44 new locations. It subsequently has been found elsewhere on the fort (Dave Beckmann, pers. comm.; Maxwell & Givnish 1994). At Fort McCoy, fame flower thrives in areas with apparent intermediate in- tensity disturbances (e.g., mechanical or fire) either in full sun or partial shade. It most commonly grows in small vegetation gaps (about 5 to 30 cm diameter) within a matrix of short native species, such as Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pen- sylvanica). This is consistent with Cochrane’s (1993) view that fame flower is not a typical sand prairie species, but is a specialist with a narrow ecological am- plitude and a lack of competitive ability. Habitats at the Fort were jack-pine bar- rens, sandy oak savannas, sand prairies, semi-eroded sandy slopes, sandstone outcrops, and the margins of sand blows and tank trails. I found one population of dragon’s sagewort (Artemisia dracunculus: Aster- aceae). It is a herbaceous perennial native to Eurasia and the Great Plains. The eastern limit of its North American range is in Wisconsin. The Fort McCoy pop- ulation included about 50 apparent clones, each with from five to 100 stems. These were located in full sun on a good quality bluff prairie situated on a steep (20–30 percent) southwest-facing slope (Leach 2319, WIS). This habitat is sim- ilar to the sandy bluff prairies (Mickelson & Iltis 1966) and rocky bluff prairies (Hartley 1966) described for other Wisconsin populations. 2001 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 7 TABLE 1.
Recommended publications
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • • Report and Management Plan for Muscatatuck Seep Springs
    •. • Report and Management Plan for Muscatatuck Seep Springs Research Natural Area at Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge Prepared by Division of Nature Preserves Natural Heritage Program Indiana Department of Natural Resources 1990 • United States • Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Final Report The following report was undertaken to determine the management needs of the threatened and endangered species and the natural community within the Research Natural Area, Muscatatuck Seep Springs, located within Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge, in southern Indiana . • Acknowledgements This study was initiated in 1988 through the efforts of Jim Aldrich, former Heritage Program coordinator for the Division of Nature Preserves, and Donna Stanley, project coordinator for Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge. Without their perseverance, this study would not have been completed. A special thanks goes to The Nature Conservancy, who provided initial interest in designation of the site as a Research Natural Area, and partial funding for this project. We especially thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who provided most of the funding . • • Table of Contents A. Introduction . 1 1. General Description-.. -:-: . 1 2. Local History . 1 3. Additional Information . 1 B. Justification . 1 1. Outstanding Features . 1 2. Significance . 2 3. RNA Program . 2 4. Past Interest . 3 C. Location . ·. 3 1. Administrative Units . 3 2. Latitude and Longitude . 3 3. Legal Description . 3 4. Watershed . 3 5. Area Size . 5 6. Ownership . 5 7. Access . 5 D. Cover Type . 5 • 1. Natural Community Dominants and SAF Equivalents . 5 E. Present Conditions . 8 1. Physiography . 8 2. Climate ....................... -. 8 3. Geology . 8 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Phalaris Arundinacea Carex Canescens Reed Canarygrass Gray Bog Sedge Rapid FQA–Methods Development
    Development of a Rapid Floristic Quality Assessment Michael Bourdaghs Introduction Rapid Assessment Methods (RAMs) – Simple field observations – Qualitative/categorical – Coarse info quickly obtained in exchange for accuracy (EPA Level 2) – ‘Rapid’ = ½ day field + ½ day office Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) – Vegetation based approach – Condition measure – Detailed veg survey (EPA Level 3) What is FQA? The Coefficient of Conservatism (C ) – Reflects the fidelity of a species to natural undisturbed habitats (0-10) http://wisplants.uwsp.edu/ Acer negundo Carex lacustris Cypripedium candidum (Box elder) (Lake sedge) (Small White Lady’s Slipper) C = 1 C = 5 C = 10 Development of MN FQA C –value assignment project – Wetland spp. list C-value Description Plants with a wide range of ecological tolerances. Often these plant s are – Narrative guidance opportunistic invaders of natural communities (e.g. Phalaris 0 arundinacea) or native species typical of disturbed or ruderal communities (e.g., Ambrosia artemisiifolia or Hordeum jubatum ssp. – Critical Connections jubatum) Ecological Services, Widespread t axa t hat are not t ypical of a part icular community (e.g., 1-2 Inc. Impat i ens capensisor Acer negundo) Plants with an intermediate range of ecological tolerances that typify a – Iterative process 3-5 st able phase of some nat ive communit ies, but persist under some • CCES initial disturbance (e.g., Carex comosa or Potamogeton richardsonii) assignment Plants with a moderately narrow range of ecological tolerances that 6-8 typify stable
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Wfs57 Southern Wet Ash Swamp Factsheet
    WET FOREST SYSTEM WFs57 Southern Floristic Region Southern Wet Ash Swamp Wet hardwood forests on mucky or peaty soils in areas of groundwater seepage, most often on level stream or river terraces at bases of steep slopes. Community is uncommon and often present as small inclusions within larger forest areas. Vegetation Structure & Composition Description is based on summary of vegetation data from 32 plots (relevés) • Ground layer is characterized by raised peaty hummocks, with open pools and rivulets in seepage areas. Wetland species such as common marsh marigold (Caltha palustris), touch-me-nots (Impatiens spp.), and fowl manna grass (Glyceria striata) are common in wet areas, with Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus spp.), jack-in-the-pulpit (Ari- saema triphyllum), wood nettle (Laportea canadensis), wild geranium (Geranium mac- ulatum), common enchanter’s nightshade (Circaea lutetiana), tall coneflower (Rud- beckia laciniata), and other mesic or wet- mesic forest species present on hummocks. Skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), false mermaid (Floerkea proserpinacoides), brome-like sedge (Carex bromoides), and smooth-sheathed sedge (C. laevivaginata) are sometimes abundant in seepage zones and in Minnesota are essentially restricted to this community. • Shrub layer is sparse (5-25% cover). Black ash seedlings or saplings are almost always present, often with wild black currant (Ribes americanum), chokecherry (Prunus virginiana), and nannyberry (Viburnum lentago). • Subcanopy, when present, is patchy to interrupted (25-75% cover) and generally not well differentiated from canopy. • Canopy is patchy to interrupted, with trees often absent from localized areas of groundwater discharge and in some instances limited to margins of the community around open peaty upwelling zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Thelypteridaceae – Marsh Fern Family
    THELYPTERIDACEAE – MARSH FERN FAMILY Plant: fern, terrestrial (rarely epiphytic) Root: Stem and Leaves: stems erect to creeping, usually with 2 vascular bundles, cresent-shaped; leaves either monomorphic (one leaf type) or slightly dimorphic (blade differences minor), scales mostly absent, blade pinnate to pinnate-pinnatifid (rarely by-pinnate or more divided) Fruit (Sori): sori on veins and of various shapes but usually not elongate, an indusium often with hairs, spores monolete, bilateral Other: Division Pteridophyta (Ferns) Genera: 30+ genera * Fern terminology is discussed in PLANT TERMS, a separate tab on the HOME page. WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive THELYPTERIDACEAE – MARSH FERN FAMILY Eastern Marsh Fern; Thelypteris palustris Schott var. pubescens (G. Lawson) Fernald Eastern Marsh Fern - P1 USDA Thelypteris palustris Schott var. pubescens (G. Lawson) Fernald Thelypteridaceae (Marsh Fern Family) Near Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Stoddard County, Missouri Notes: fern, deciduous; leaves somewhat dimorphic (pinnae of fertile leaves somewhat narrower, more erect), up to 1m, lanceolate with proximal pinnae a little shorter, mostly pinnate-pinnatifid, terminal pinnae just pinnatifid, pinnatifid segments of pinnae entire, veins usually forked, hairs on costae and often on veins; petiole smooth and straw colored; spore cases round, medial; indusia peltate to reniform (sometimes leaf blade strongly revolute); costae slightly hairy and scaly with a front groove; seeps and marshy areas; summer to fall [V Max Brown, 2017] Eastern Marsh Fern – P2 Thelypteris palustris Schott var. pubescens (G. Lawson) Fernald [V Max Brown, 2017] Sporangia Indusia Costae (midrib), veins, and sori with hairs.
    [Show full text]
  • American Fern Journal
    AMERICAN FERN JOURNAL QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN FERN SOCIETY Broad-Scale Integrity and Local Divergence in the Fiddlehead Fern Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Todaro (Onocleaceae) DANIEL M. KOENEMANN Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711-3157, e-mail: [email protected] JACQUELINE A. MAISONPIERRE University of Vermont, Department of Plant Biology, Jeffords Hall, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, e-mail: [email protected] DAVID S. BARRINGTON University of Vermont, Department of Plant Biology, Jeffords Hall, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, e-mail: [email protected] American Fern Journal 101(4):213–230 (2011) Broad-Scale Integrity and Local Divergence in the Fiddlehead Fern Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Todaro (Onocleaceae) DANIEL M. KOENEMANN Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711-3157, e-mail: [email protected] JACQUELINE A. MAISONPIERRE University of Vermont, Department of Plant Biology, Jeffords Hall, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, e-mail: [email protected] DAVID S. BARRINGTON University of Vermont, Department of Plant Biology, Jeffords Hall, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT.—Matteuccia struthiopteris (Onocleaceae) has a present-day distribution across much of the north-temperate and boreal regions of the world. Much of its current North American and European distribution was covered in ice or uninhabitable tundra during the Pleistocene. Here we use DNA sequences and AFLP data to investigate the genetic variation of the fiddlehead fern at two geographic scales to infer the historical biogeography of the species. Matteuccia struthiopteris segregates globally into minimally divergent (0.3%) Eurasian and American lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of New Zealand Ferns and Lycophytes Onocleaceae Pj Brownsey
    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND FERNS AND LYCOPHYTES ONOCLEACEAE P.J. BROWNSEY & L.R. PERRIE Fascicle 28 – DECEMBER 2020 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2020. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Brownsey, P. J. (Patrick John), 1948– Flora of New Zealand : ferns and lycophytes. Fascicle 28, Onocleaceae / P.J. Brownsey and L.R. Perrie. -- Lincoln, N.Z.: Manaaki Whenua Press, 2020. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-947525-68-2 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34761-6 (set) 1.Ferns -- New Zealand – Identification. I. Perrie, L. R. (Leon Richard). II. Title. III. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.394.742(931) DC 587.30993 DOI: 10.7931/rjn3-hp32 This work should be cited as: Brownsey, P.J. & Perrie, L.R. 2020: Onocleaceae. In: Breitwieser, I. (ed.) Flora of New Zealand — Ferns and Lycophytes. Fascicle 28. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/rjn3-hp32 Date submitted: 18 Jun 2020; Date accepted: 21 Jul 2020; Date published: 2 January 2021 Cover image: Onoclea sensibilis. Herbarium specimen of cultivated plant from near Swanson, Auckland. CHR 229544. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • FOSZB Bioblitz II 2014
    Sax-Zim Bog BioBlitz II August 2, 2014 INSECTS LATIN LOCATION NOTES NOTES OBSERVER BioBlitz II Candy-striped Leafhopper Graphocephala coccinea Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Twice-stabbed Stink Bug Cosmopepla lintneriana Lake Nichols Rd in milkweed stand fairly common as several seen Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Weevil Lepyrus palustris Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Banded Longhorn Typocerus velutinus Lake Nichols Rd in milkweed stand Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Red-shouldered Pine Borer Stictoleptura canadensis Lake Nichols Rd in milkweed stand Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Parasitic Fly Cylindromia interrupta Sparky Stensaas BioBlitz II Brown Mantid Fly Climaciella brunnea near Welcome Center Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Bee Fly sp. Anthrax irroratus Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Orange-tailed Bumble Bee (Red-belted) Bombus rufocinctus Chad Heins BUTTERFLIES BioBlitz II Eastern Tiger Swallowtail Papilio canadensis caterpillar Chad Heins BioBlitz II Cabbage White Pieris rapae Sparky BioBlitz II Clouded Sulphur Colias philodice Chad Heins BioBlitz II Pink-edged Sulphur Colias interior Chad Heins BioBlitz II Dorcas Copper Lycaena dorcas Arkola Rd about 1 mile E of Owl Ave Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Spring "Summer" Azure Celastrina ladon Lake Nichols Rd in milkweed stand Sparky BioBlitz II Great Spangled Fritillary Speyeria cybele Welcome Center on Owl Ave m. obs BioBlitz II Atlantis Fritillary Speyeria atlantis Lake Nichols Rd Sparky BioBlitz II Northern Crescent Phyciodes selenis Lake Nichols Rd in milkweed stand Sparky’s group BioBlitz II Mourning Cloak
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Iowa Plant Species List
    !PLANTCO FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE: IOWA DATABASE This list has been modified from it's origional version which can be found on the following website: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~herbarium/Cofcons.xls IA CofC SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME PHYSIOGNOMY W Wet 9 Abies balsamea Balsam fir TREE FACW * ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI Buttonweed A-FORB 4 FACU- 4 Acalypha gracilens Slender three-seeded mercury A-FORB 5 UPL 3 Acalypha ostryifolia Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 5 UPL 6 Acalypha rhomboidea Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 3 FACU 0 Acalypha virginica Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 3 FACU * ACER GINNALA Amur maple TREE 5 UPL 0 Acer negundo Box elder TREE -2 FACW- 5 Acer nigrum Black maple TREE 5 UPL * Acer rubrum Red maple TREE 0 FAC 1 Acer saccharinum Silver maple TREE -3 FACW 5 Acer saccharum Sugar maple TREE 3 FACU 10 Acer spicatum Mountain maple TREE FACU* 0 Achillea millefolium lanulosa Western yarrow P-FORB 3 FACU 10 Aconitum noveboracense Northern wild monkshood P-FORB 8 Acorus calamus Sweetflag P-FORB -5 OBL 7 Actaea pachypoda White baneberry P-FORB 5 UPL 7 Actaea rubra Red baneberry P-FORB 5 UPL 7 Adiantum pedatum Northern maidenhair fern FERN 1 FAC- * ADLUMIA FUNGOSA Allegheny vine B-FORB 5 UPL 10 Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel P-FORB 0 FAC * AEGILOPS CYLINDRICA Goat grass A-GRASS 5 UPL 4 Aesculus glabra Ohio buckeye TREE -1 FAC+ * AESCULUS HIPPOCASTANUM Horse chestnut TREE 5 UPL 10 Agalinis aspera Rough false foxglove A-FORB 5 UPL 10 Agalinis gattingeri Round-stemmed false foxglove A-FORB 5 UPL 8 Agalinis paupercula False foxglove
    [Show full text]
  • The Ferns and Their Relatives (Lycophytes)
    N M D R maidenhair fern Adiantum pedatum sensitive fern Onoclea sensibilis N D N N D D Christmas fern Polystichum acrostichoides bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum N D P P rattlesnake fern (top) Botrychium virginianum ebony spleenwort Asplenium platyneuron walking fern Asplenium rhizophyllum bronze grapefern (bottom) B. dissectum v. obliquum N N D D N N N R D D broad beech fern Phegopteris hexagonoptera royal fern Osmunda regalis N D N D common woodsia Woodsia obtusa scouring rush Equisetum hyemale adder’s tongue fern Ophioglossum vulgatum P P P P N D M R spinulose wood fern (left & inset) Dryopteris carthusiana marginal shield fern (right & inset) Dryopteris marginalis narrow-leaved glade fern Diplazium pycnocarpon M R N N D D purple cliff brake Pellaea atropurpurea shining fir moss Huperzia lucidula cinnamon fern Osmunda cinnamomea M R N M D R Appalachian filmy fern Trichomanes boschianum rock polypody Polypodium virginianum T N J D eastern marsh fern Thelypteris palustris silvery glade fern Deparia acrostichoides southern running pine Diphasiastrum digitatum T N J D T T black-footed quillwort Isoëtes melanopoda J Mexican mosquito fern Azolla mexicana J M R N N P P D D northern lady fern Athyrium felix-femina slender lip fern Cheilanthes feei net-veined chain fern Woodwardia areolata meadow spike moss Selaginella apoda water clover Marsilea quadrifolia Polypodiaceae Polypodium virginanum Dryopteris carthusiana he ferns and their relatives (lycophytes) living today give us a is tree shows a current concept of the Dryopteridaceae Dryopteris marginalis is poster made possible by: { Polystichum acrostichoides T evolutionary relationships among Onocleaceae Onoclea sensibilis glimpse of what the earth’s vegetation looked like hundreds of Blechnaceae Woodwardia areolata Illinois fern ( green ) and lycophyte Thelypteridaceae Phegopteris hexagonoptera millions of years ago when they were the dominant plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses, Sedges, and Rushes Within the Park Is the Proliferation of Exotic Plants, Particularly Non-Native Eurasian Grass Species
    Shenandoah National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Full Species List of Grasses, Sedges & Rushes Collectively referred to as graminoids, grass and the grass-like (sedges and rushes) species account for 13% of the vascular plants within Shenandoah National Park and are found in a variety of habitats. While typically associated with open areas such as meadows and lawns, graminoids can also be found in forest ecosystems. Despite their relative abundance, these species are often overlooked because of their small wind-pollinated flowers and nondescript linear leaves. The largest threat to native grasses, sedges, and rushes within the park is the proliferation of exotic plants, particularly non-native Eurasian grass species. In Shenandoah National Park grasses can be easily viewed at Big Carex buxbaumii Meadows where colonial bent grass (Agrostis capillaris) and tall oatgrass (Arrhenatherum elatius) are especially abundant. The troublesome invasive species Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum) can be seen throughout the Elkwallow picnic area where it is has displaced nearly all other forest understory plants. This checklist was compiled on March 10, 2015 using data exported from the National Park Service NPSpecies database. The database can be accessed at https://irma.nps.gov/NPSpecies/. Here you will find search tools that make it possible to create updated or customized lists. This checklist and others are found at https://irma.nps.gov/NPSpecies/Search/SpeciesList/SHEN. Lists are currently available for the following: mammals, birds, fish, Sorghastrum nutans reptiles, amphibians, butterflies, plants (complete list), trees and shrubs, wildflowers, ferns, and grasses. Please be advised that Latin scientific names often change as a result of new research; therefore, scientific names used here may not reflect the most current accepted nomenclature.
    [Show full text]