DOCSLIB.ORG

A Biblical Response to Progressive Christianity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Biblical Response to Progressive Christianity THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CHRISTIAN FEMALE INFLUENCERS: A BIBLICAL RESPONSE TO PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANITY By Alicia W. Garcia A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Worship Studies Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA May 12, 2020 THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CHRISTIAN FEMALE INFLUENCERS: A BIBLICAL RESPONSE TO PROGRESSIVE CHRISTIANITY By Alicia W. Garcia A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements of the Degree Doctor of Worship Studies Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA May 13, 2020 APPROVED BY: Dr. Paul Rumrill, Advisor ____________________________ Dr. Mindy Damon, Reader ____________________________ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................1 Abstract ...........................................................................................................................2 List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................3 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................4 Background ..........................................................................................................4 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................6 Problem Statement ..............................................................................................9 Purpose Statement ...............................................................................................9 Significance of the Study ....................................................................................10 Research Questions .............................................................................................11 Hypotheses ..........................................................................................................11 Core Concepts ......................................................................................................12 Definition of Terms .............................................................................................12 Chapter Summary ...............................................................................................15 CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ..................................................16 Taxonomy ...........................................................................................................16 Section I: The Authority of Scripture .................................................................17 Section II: Biblical and Historical Foundations of Worship ...............................27 Section III: Progressive Christianity and Liberal Philosophy .............................31 Section IV: Statistical Data and Biblical Worldview .........................................36 Section V: Evangelism and Public Leadership ...................................................38 Section VI: Spiritual Formation and Worship ....................................................41 Section VII: Christian Apologetics .....................................................................43 CHAPTER THREE: METHODS ...................................................................................45 Introduction .........................................................................................................45 Design .................................................................................................................46 Questions and Hypotheses ..................................................................................46 CHAPTER FOUR: RESEARCH FINDINGS ................................................................47 Introduction .........................................................................................................47 Biblical Implication of True Worship .................................................................50 Section I: Biblical and Hermeneutical Implications of Worship and Spiritual Formation ....................................................................................................51 The Commission of Christ ..........................................................................51 Regeneration ...............................................................................................53 Exclusivity of Jesus Christ in Salvation ......................................................62 Authority of Scripture .................................................................................66 Evangelism ..................................................................................................77 Methodological Systems and Hermeneutical Practices ..............................80 iii Section II: Philosophical Implications of Progressive Christianity and Contemporary Cultural Influences .....................................................................................................85 Ideology of Relativism .................................................................................85 Ideology of Pluralism ...................................................................................96 Ideology of Cultural Tolerance ....................................................................101 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION ...............................................................................120 Summary of Study ...............................................................................................120 Summary of Purpose ...........................................................................................120 Summary of Procedure ........................................................................................120 Summary of Findings and Prior Research ..........................................................121 Limitations ..........................................................................................................121 Recommendations for Future Study ...................................................................122 Conclusion Summary ...........................................................................................123 Recommendations for Christian Female Influencers ..........................................123 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................127 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr. Paul Rumrill for the countless hours of guiding the thesis from beginning to end. You kept the journey enjoyable and exciting, and helped me bring it to a joyous completion. I am forever grateful. I would like to pay special regards to Dr. Mindy Damon, thesis mentor, and designated reader of this project. Dr. Damon and her staff in the WRSP 880 portion of the thesis helped me develop a strong abstract, research questions and hypotheses that held true throughout the research. I wish to show my gratitude to Dr. Vernon M. Whaley for believing in me and my calling to the ministry of worship. Thank you for inviting me to teach at Liberty University and encouraging me to achieve both the Master and Doctorate in Worship Studies. I wish to thank the office staff in the School of Music at Liberty University. Your professionalism provided invaluable assistance during my study. I am indebted to my beloved husband, Richard Garcia, and my sons, Michael and David Garcia. You sacrificed the most when I had to study, write, and be away from you. Thank you for your patience, understanding hearts, and deep-seated love. It is with whole-hearted appreciation that I acknowledge Kay Arthur and the leaders at Precept Ministries International. Your leadership over the past twenty-five years in inductive Bible methodology served as a rock of assurance as I worked for biblical accuracy within this research. I would like to recognize the ladies who allow me to teach the Scriptures to them. You were the poof that my hypotheses were accurate because I have celebrated His work in your lives as we have come to the knowledge of the truth. Thank you for the invaluable assistance that you all provided during my study.” I wish to express deep regards to the three ladies I pray with weekly. Your prayers and friendship were monumental towards the success of this study. I would like to acknowledge and thank every sponsor of events where I have been invited to speak and lead worship. Your trust in me served as a constant reminder that I am doing exactly what God has called me to do. I am looking forward to future events when I can share this research with you on a more personal level. Because of you, the hypotheses in this thesis have been proven time and time again. I write this thesis in honor of you and your worshipful response to the core concepts of this scholarly documents. And to the highest authority in heaven and on earth, Jesus Christ, the risen Messiah, my highest gratitude and deepest worship. Without You, I can do nothing, but in Your strength, I can do all things. Thank You for the help of Your abiding presence in the making of this report. Through this research, may You be glorified, and Your kingdom increased. 1 ABSTRACT Many Christian female influencers have large followings of Christian women, although many influential Bible study authors, teachers, motivational speakers, musicians, worship leaders, social media, and online influencers may not be instructing Christian women in the core beliefs of Christianity. As a result,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Must Satan Be Released? Indeed He Must Be: Toward a Biblical Understanding of Revelation 20:3 Gregory H
    Volume 25, Number 1 • Spring 2014 Must Satan Be Released? Indeed He Must Be: Toward a Biblical Understanding of Revelation 20:3 Gregory H. Harris Regaining Our Focus: A Response to the Social Action Trend in Evangelical Missions Joel James and Brian Biedebach The Seed of Abraham: A Theological Analysis of Galatians 3 and Its Implications for Israel Michael Riccardi A Review of Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy Norman L. Geisler THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL published by THE MASTER’S SEMINARY John MacArthur, President Richard L. Mayhue, Executive Vice-President and Dean Edited for the Faculty: William D. Barrick John MacArthur Irvin A. Busenitz Richard L. Mayhue Nathan A. Busenitz Alex D. Montoya Keith H. Essex James Mook F. David Farnell Bryan J. Murphy Paul W. Felix Kelly T. Osborne Michael A. Grisanti Dennis M. Swanson Gregory H. Harris Michael J. Vlach Matthew W. Waymeyer by Richard L. Mayhue, Editor Michael J. Vlach, Executive Editor Dennis M. Swanson, Book Review Editor Garry D. Knussman, Editorial Consultant The views represented herein are not necessarily endorsed by The Master’s Seminary, its administration, or its faculty. The Master’s Seminary Journal (MSJ) is is published semiannually each spring and fall. Beginning with the May 2013 issue, MSJ is distributed electronically for free. Requests to MSJ and email address changes should be addressed to [email protected]. Articles, general correspondence, and policy questions should be directed to Dr. Michael J. Vlach. Book reviews should be sent to Dr. Dennis M. Swanson. The Master’s Seminary Journal 13248 Roscoe Blvd., Sun Valley, CA 91352 The Master’s Seminary Journal is indexed in Elenchus Bibliographicus Biblicus of Biblica; Christian Periodical Index; and Guide to Social Science & Religion in Periodical Literature.
    [Show full text]
  • 109-120 Tucker Book Review
    BOOK REVIEWS Libertarianism—A Primer. By David Boaz. New York: The Free Press, 1997. Libertarianism: A Reader. David Boaz, ed. New York: The Free Press, 1997. What It Means to Be A Libertarian. By Charles Murray. New York: Broadway Books, 1997. Reviewed by Jeffrey Tucker* he American anti-statist intellectual tradition includes a wide variety of thinkers, from left utopians to secessionist T agrarians to right anarchists. Seemingly small theoret- ical differences between them can produce hugely different an- swers to the all-important question: what is to be done? Murray Rothbard’s primary contribution to this tradition was to firmly tie anti-statism to a strict adherence to property rights, rights which the state tramples on by its very existence, and rights which are best protected and enforced by private parties. The answer to the question of what is to be done follows clearly: gov- ernment power must be curbed and eliminated, to be replaced by private association. But modern libertarians haven’t always fol- lowed up on this radical Rothbardian project. Some libertarian writers—let’s call them left-libertarians—prefer to concentrate on the personal liberties associated with this political doctrine, while submerging property-centered social theory and a radical critique of the State, especially of the imperial state, within a larger laundry list of other aspects of libertarian policy. David Boaz’s primer may not be the prime example of ap- plied left-libertarianism (the post-Goldwater works of Karl Hess better deserve this moniker) but it nonetheless fits comfort- ably in that category. The reader is left with no doubt about where Boaz stands on lifestyle issues (drugs, sex, speech, etc.) and the policy concerns of the punditry class (how this or that program can be improved), but is left to speculate on precisely how strict Boaz’s utopia would be with regard to the protection of property rights, or how or on what level of society those rights would be enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauerwas and the Law: Framing a Productive Conversation
    07_KAVENY (DO NOT DELETE) 11/19/2012 3:59 PM HAUERWAS AND THE LAW: FRAMING A PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATION CATHLEEN KAVENY* I INTRODUCTION The title of this symposium is “Theological Argument in Law: Engaging with Stanley Hauerwas.” When I discussed the project with colleagues specializing in Christian theological ethics, they were interested, even intrigued. Truth be told, however, they were also rather skeptical. Why the skepticism? It is universally acknowledged that Hauerwas is both engaged and engaging, actively involved in wide-ranging conversations with academics, pastors, doctors, and—yes—even lawyers. Furthermore, no one would deny that arguments rooted in the Christian theological tradition have made their way into American law over the years. Indeed, in 1892, a Supreme Court opinion unselfconsciously proclaimed that “this is a Christian nation.”1 “A Christian nation”? Ah-ha! Many Christian theologians would say there is the problem in a nutshell. Throughout his career, Stanley Hauerwas has tirelessly protested all efforts to embed Christianity, as either an intellectual system or social group, into the framework of worldly power. Such efforts, in his view, inevitably corrupt the thought and the practices of Christians, twisting both toward the goal of sustaining the kingdoms of this world, rather than building the kingdom of God that was inaugurated by the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Unlike the “peaceable kingdom” of Jesus, earthly kingdoms are inherently built on violence—not only the violence of warfare, but also the threats of coercive force that ultimately and undeniably back any system of positive law.2 The law, in other words, describes and implements the operating system of the strikingly unpeaceable secular world.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant's Doctrine of Religion As Political Philosophy
    Kant's Doctrine of Religion as Political Philosophy Author: Phillip David Wodzinski Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/987 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2009 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Political Science KANT’S DOCTRINE OF RELIGION AS POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY a dissertation by PHILLIP WODZINSKI submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2009 © copyright by PHILLIP DAVID WODZINSKI 2009 ABSTRACT Kant’s Doctrine of Religion as Political Philosophy Phillip Wodzinski Advisor: Susan Shell, Ph.D. Through a close reading of Immanuel Kant’s late book, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, the dissertation clarifies the political element in Kant’s doctrine of religion and so contributes to a wider conception of his political philosophy. Kant’s political philosophy of religion, in addition to extending and further animating his moral doctrine, interprets religion in such a way as to give the Christian faith a moral grounding that will make possible, and even be an agent of, the improvement of social and political life. The dissertation emphasizes the wholeness and structure of Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason as a book, for the teaching of the book is not exhausted by the articulation of its doctrine but also includes both the fact and the manner of its expression: the reader learns most fully from Kant by giving attention to the structure and tone of the book as well as to its stated content and argumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • The African American Church Response to Homosexuality And
    Liberty University Rawlings School of Divinity The African American Church Response to Homosexuality and the Reasons There Is No Response A Thesis Project Submitted to The Faculty of Rawlings School of Divinity In Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Ministry By Robert Jackson Jr. Lynchburg, Virginia March 31, 2019 Copyright © 2019 by Robert Jackson, Jr. All Rights Reserved Acknowledgements “Praise God from whom all blessings flow. Praise Him all creatures here below.” Oh God, I have so many people who have helped me get to this point in my life. First, I want to thank the Lord, Jesus Christ, who saved me from my sins. My mother, Mary Ella Parker who birthed me into this world. There are so many memories of her on how she gave of herself to so many people that she came in contact with. I will be so ever grateful for giving me the honor of preaching her eulogy. Love you Mama. My stepfather, Wesley Parker, for raising me and guiding me to become a man. Also, in Heavenly places, Chaplain (LTC) Ervin J. Jennings, who help me in so many ways and his wife, who yet lives, Mother Evelena Jennings. Chaplain (Col) Louis W. Pointer, for always encouraging me and who has meant so much to the body of Christ across the U.S. and the world. Mother Sessions, who at 85 young years of age, still prays for me and has helped so many of us. Tongue will never be able to tell, but God knows and He will reward. My Spiritual Mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Enns, Ph.D. Abram S
    Peter Enns, Ph.D. Abram S. Clemens Professor of Biblical Studies Eastern University 1300 Eagle Rd. St. Davids, PA 19087 610-­‐341-­‐1491 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. (1989-­‐1994) Harvard University, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations Dissertation: “Exodus Retold: Ancient Exegesis of the Departure from Egypt in Wis -­‐ 10:15 21 and 19:1-­‐9,” advisor: Dr. James L. Kugel M.A. (1993) Harvard University, Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations M.Div. (1985 -­‐1989) Westminster Theological Seminary (Philadelphia, PA) B.A. (1978-­‐1982) Messiah College (Grantham, PA), Behavioral Science (1979-­‐1982) Rutgers University (New Brunswick, NJ), Psychology (1978-­‐1979) LEARNED SOCIETIES Society of Biblical Literature (1991 -­‐present) Steering Committee: Wisdom in Israelite and Cognate 2006 Traditions ( -­‐2012) Institute for Biblical Research (1991 -­‐present) Executive Committee (2002-­‐04); Board of Directors (2004-­‐07) Editorial Board for Bulletin the for Biblical Research (2002-­‐04) TEACHING EXPERIENCE Fulltime Eastern University (2012-­‐present) Abram S. Clemens Professor of Biblical Studies -­‐ (2014 Present) Affiliate Professor of Biblical Studies (2012-­‐2014) Nature and Meaning of the New Testament; aning Nature and Me of the Old Testament; Romans in Context; Genesis in Context; Biblical Hermeneutics; Research Methodology; Hebrew Prophets ; Israelite History and Historiography; Pentateuch; Developed and taught online s: course Nature and Meaning of the Old Testament, Nature and Meaning of the New Testament Westminster Theological Seminary (1994 -­‐2008) Professor of Old Testament and Biblical Hermeneutics -­‐ (2005 2008) Associate Professor of Old Testament (1997-­‐2005; tenured, 2001) Assistant Professor of Old Testament (1994-­‐97) M.Div./MAR curriculum: Hebrew; Old Testament Introduction; Poetry and Wisdom Literature; Old Testament History and Theology 1 (lectures on upervision Exodus); s of independent courses on Psalms and Proverbs; Preaching from the Old Testament Ph.D./Th.M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Contemporary Faith Wes Campbell, November 2011
    1 A Guide to Contemporary Faith Wes Campbell, November 2011 Introduction Our time presents a crisis for Christian faith. In our situation which some describe as ‘post-Christian’ or post-Christendom, the challenge reaches into the heart of faith, challenging God in the name of ‘atheism’1. The crisis produces both pastoral and intellectual challenges, as the Christian community seeks to chart a way in our contemporary world. Often it is suggested that there are but two ways of responding, each offering an extreme position: either, a return to pre-modern (fundamentalist) ways of thinking, or, an unqualified (progressive) acceptance of modernist (or postmodernist) modes of thought. It sometimes seems as if we are being required to choose between two different fundamentalisms. However, as Christians grapple with these challenges, we are faced with an even more fundamental challenge: the challenge of God who speaks to our situation, bringing a crisis which challenges, judges and renews the world2. This paper is a brief response to our contemporary situation. Our main interest is to assist people to hear Jesus Christ’s call to discipleship in the 21st century. Here we will be reminded of the basic commitments made as the Uniting Church was formed. The discussion here will offer some pointers for the task of interpreting and understanding the Christian faith now3. Understanding Christian Faith From the beginning understanding biblical faith has been a controversial and challenging matter. The most obvious reason for this is that faith itself emerged from challenging and controversial circumstances. For example, the faith of Israel has its early origins in the escape of Hebrew slaves from Egypt, led by Moses.
    [Show full text]
  • On Protestantism's Uneasy and Diverse Response to Higher Criticism
    Studies in the Bible and Antiquity Volume 8 Article 5 2016 Reflections (Personal and Otherwise) on Protestantism’s Uneasy and Diverse Response to Higher Criticism Peter Enns Eastern University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sba Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Enns, Peter (2016) "Reflections (Personal and Otherwise) on Protestantism’s Uneasy and Diverse Response to Higher Criticism," Studies in the Bible and Antiquity: Vol. 8 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sba/vol8/iss1/5 This Forum is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies in the Bible and Antiquity by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Reflections (Personal and Otherwise) on Protestantism’s Uneasy and Diverse Response to Higher Criticism Peter Enns Middle Protestants Each of us has been asked to address some important questions about the intersection of our own faith traditions and higher criticism— an apt metaphor, since “intersections” are where collisions often hap- pen. This brings me to my topic, Protestantism and higher criticism, a messy subject to be sure. There is hardly a single Protestant perspective on anything. The iterations of Protestantism number in hundreds or even thousands of diverse and even opposed denominations and theologies that stub- bornly resist unification. These persist, rather, in order to be distinct, to lay claim to a more correct expression of the Christian faith.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trinity for Unitarians 1
    The Trinity for Unitarians - An Overview in 4 Parts by Rev. Tony Lorenzen pg. 1 The Trinity for Unitarians 1 – Overview and Method Method “You might say that Unitarianism has become dogmatic for us — the Trinity being something that a "good" UU simply cannot believe in because we are, by default, anti-Trinitarians. I'd suggest instead that UUs celebrate theological liberalism as a method rather than as a set of theological conclusions.” – Chris Walton, Editor UU World (in his blog “Philocrities”). “Christian Faith is the response to Jesus” not “getting back to the religion of Jesus.” The Trinity is part of that response as Jesus communities answer the question “How is God with us?” “When God is too close or too removed, humans take his place." Biblical Studies – historical critical method and the use of reason become the hallmark of anti-trinitarian theological method, yet many if not most of the Unitarian, Universalist and other “heretics” we encounter will use an “uncritical” approach to scripture in their justification for theological positions, even using “proof-texting” or citing scripture texts th uncritically to support their views, well into the 19 ​ century. ​ “Some of us UUs these days are just finding the Trinity a helpful metaphor and a window to God, however smudged.” – Rev. Tony Lorenzen Heresy/Hertics Heresy comes from a greek work meaning “to choose.” A heretic is someone who has not given up the right to choose what to think or what to believe. Heresy is measured in juxtaposition to orthodoxy or “right” thinking. Arianism - from Arius (256-336) north African priest (leader).
    [Show full text]
  • But If You Do Marry …
    But If You Do Marry … a study in marriage, divorce, and remarriage by Jay Guin copyright Jay Guin 2000-07 revised January 21, 2007 All rights reserved. However, until such time as this manuscript or portions of it are published for profit, permission is granted to freely copy and redistribute copies of this for non-commercial, nonprofit uses. I may be contacted at [email protected] . My home phone is 205-758-1710. You may write me at 1902 Kings Gate Drive, Tuscaloosa, AL 35406. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Preface............................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 3. The traditional view—doctrinal background .................................................... 5 Chapter 4. Marriage in Biblical times............................................................................... 12 Chapter 5. Divorce in Biblical times................................................................................. 18 Chapter 6. What is adultery?............................................................................................. 22 Chapter 7. The Old Testament’s teaching on divorce....................................................... 24 Chapter 8. 1 Corinthians 7 ................................................................................................ 28 Chapter 9. Grace ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEW Spirit and Secularity
    NAHME - CHAPTER 3 DRAFT- NOT FOR CITATION Chapter 3 Race, Religion, and Identity: the (Theo-)Politics of Kantianism and the Predicament of German Jewish Liberalism In the century since their first, limited experience of emancipation in 1812, many German Jews gained an increasing awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of appealing to civic rights and individual freedoms to seek recognition in German public institutions. On the one hand, these liberal ideals of freedom and equality, duty and obligation to the rational legal state (Rechtstaat) gave German Jews a sense of belonging to the German Fatherland and held up the image of the rights-bearing citizen as an ideal to strive toward. But on the other hand, as we saw in the previous chapter, the Jewish Question was also increasingly framed as a problem implicit in the developing discourse of liberalism and gave rise to an anxiety over the secularization of political and moral public discourse about values, norms, and social ideals in Wilhelmine Germany. The Jewish Question, as I argued, was both an epistemological and a political predicament. Whether all “Germans” acknowledged Jews as belonging to a community and fraternity of national identity is less important, however, than the diversity in normative goals represented by the introduction of a liberal philosophical worldview in Imperial Germany as the means for articulating a still inchoate national identity. And because the Jews, like many of their compatriots, participated in a collective imagining of what a “civic” identity could be, their engagement with both the liberalism and idealism of the late nineteenth century gives voice to the significant influence of 197 NAHME - CHAPTER 3 DRAFT- NOT FOR CITATION this intellectual worldview on the broader social and cultural moment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociology of Progressive Religious Groups Why Liberal Religious Groups Cannot Get Together
    A Sociology of Progressive Religious Groups Why Liberal Religious Groups Cannot Get Together A Talk for Sea of Faith Yorkshire, 22 September 2007, Bradford Given by Adrian Worsfold Schisms are normally carried out by traditionalists or conversionists over what is called a "presenting issue". This is not the question here but the inability of liberal groups to get together. Indeed liberals tend not to split off as groups, but they do move out as individuals. When Theophilus Lindsey rejected the 39 Articles of the Church of England and set up the first named Unitarian Church in 1774, he hoped for an exodus of Anglicans to join his new Arian based movement (he followed Samuel Clarke's Arian revision of the Book of Common Prayer). An exodus did not happen. The Arians stayed within the Church of England, and Essex Church as it was called became absorbed into the liberalising Presbyterian movement. Did not these Presbyterians split then, long before? Well, when the Presbyterians broke away from the Church of England they were fiercely Puritan and very trinitarian, with full confidence in the Bible alone to uphold Calvinist doctrine. So this too was an example of an evangelical breakaway. That they became liberal was an unintended consequence of the original Puritan intention, and they were later boosted by ideological liberals (who were also biblical literalists, reading a unitarian doctrine straight off the gospels as, indeed, the New Testament contains no doctrine of the Trinity, only its possibility). So what is this about liberal groups and then not being able to be inclusive of one another? We first need to know what groups we are talking about, what they organise for and how they function.
    [Show full text]