DOCSLIB.ORG

Uk Eiti Report for 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uk Eiti Report for 2014 UNITED KINGDOM EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE (UK EITI) UK EITI REPORT FOR 2014 April 2016 This Report has been prepared by UK EITI Multi Stakeholder Group (MSG) charged with the implementation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in the United Kingdom in collaboration with the Independent Administrator (IA). This Report has been prepared within the context of EITI reporting and is published for information purposes. The figures included within the report have not been subject to specific audit procedures and accordingly neither the MSG nor the IA take responsibility for any loss which may be incurred by any other party, should they rely on figures included within this report if such figures were later discovered not to be accurate. UK EITI report for 2014 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 5 2. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................... 9 2.1. Payment Flows ............................................................................................... 9 2.2. Government Agencies .................................................................................. 11 2.3. Materiality Threshold .................................................................................... 11 2.4. Completeness of Data .................................................................................. 11 2.5. Material Deviation ......................................................................................... 12 2.6. Methodology ................................................................................................. 12 3. INFORMATION ON THE UK EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES .................................. 16 3.1 The Extractive Industries in the UK .............................................................. 16 3.2 Oil and Gas ................................................................................................... 22 3.3 Mining and Quarrying ................................................................................... 35 3.4 Beneficial Ownership .................................................................................... 47 3.5 The UK’s Budget and Audit Processes ......................................................... 48 4. RECONCILIATION RESULTS ............................................................................. 49 4.1. Payment Reconciliation between Extractive Companies and Government Agencies ............................................................................................................... 49 4.2. Unreconciled Differences ............................................................................. 50 5. INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR’S RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE MSG .... 51 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................. 54 Annex 1: Detail of mining & quarrying receipts ..................................................... 55 Annex 2: Detail of RFCT & SC by company .......................................................... 56 Annex 3: Detail of PRT by company ..................................................................... 57 Annex 4: Detail of petroleum licence fees by company and licence number ......... 59 Annex 5: Beneficial ownership reporting form ....................................................... 69 Annex 6: Reporting templates ............................................................................... 70 Annex 7: Persons contacted or involved in the 2014 UK EITI reconciliation ......... 79 | Page 2 UK EITI report for 2014 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS BGS British Geological Survey billion one thousand million or 109 BIS Department for Business, Innovation & Skills BMAPA British Marine Aggregate Producers Association BO Beneficial ownership BODF BO declaration form boe barrel of oil equivalent as applied to trading, the standard quality of oil in Europe and elsewhere comprising a blend of four Brent North Sea crudes from the Brent, Ekofisk, Forties and Oseberg fields brownfield an oil or gas field already in production CA Coal Authority CFA Cross Field Allowance CNS Central North Sea CT Corporation Tax DCLG Department for Communities and Local Government DECC Department of Energy & Climate Change DETI [Northern Ireland] Department for Enterprise, Trade and Investment DOE Department of the Environment DRD Decommissioning Relief Deed E&P Exploration and Production EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative FYAs First Year Allowances GB Great Britain GDP Gross Domestic Product GIS Geographic Information System GPA Group Payment Arrangement GVA Gross Value Added HM Her Majesty’s HMRC Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs IA Independent Administrator LAs Local Authorities LPA Local Planning Authority M&Q Other Mining & Quarrying MEA Mineral Extraction Allowance MMO Marine Management Organisation MPA Mineral Planning Authority MPL Mineral Prospecting Licence MSG UK EITI Multistakeholder Group MTOE Million Tonnes of Oil Equivalent NAO National Audit Office NIEA Northern Ireland Environment Agency NPPF National Planning Policy Framework | Page 3 UK EITI report for 2014 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS NRW Natural Resources Wales NYM North York Moors OBR Office for Budget Responsibility OGA Oil & Gas Authority (as inheritor body of oil and gas functions from DECC) ONS Office for National Statistics PEDL Petroleum Exploration and Development Licence PEP Politically Exposed Person PMA Plant and Machinery Allowances PRT Petroleum Revenue Tax PSC Persons exercising Significant Control RDA Research and Development Allowance RFCT Ring Fence Corporation Tax RFES Ring Fence Expenditure Supplement SC Supplementary Charge SEPA Scottish Environment Protection Agency SPD Supplementary Petroleum Duty TCE The Crown Estate ToR Terms of Reference UCG Underground Coal Gasification UK United Kingdom UKCS UK Continental Shelf | Page 4 UK EITI report for 2014 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) is a global standard of transparency that, for implementing countries, requests oil, gas and mining companies to disclose what they pay to the government; and the government to disclose what it collects from these companies. The initiative aims to encourage governments to be more transparent in publicising the benefits they receive from their country’s natural resources. The EITI Global Board published the ‘EITI Standard’ in May 2013. An updated version of the standard was published in February 2016. The EITI Standard sets minimum requirements that implementing countries must meet, with the fundamental aspect of revenue transparency at its core. At the national level, EITI is governed by a multi-stakeholder group (MSG) composed of representatives from the government, the extractive industries and civil society. This oversight body sets the direction for EITI implementation by formulating country objectives, engaging stakeholders and publishing an annual EITI report. The MSG is also responsible for selecting an Independent Administrator (IA) that is responsible for reconciling data on company payments to government receipts. This first UK EITI report contains detailed information relating to £3,233 million of revenues received by UK Government Agencies from extractive companies in 2014 for a range of payments included within the scope of EITI. The report shows a breakdown of this sum between the oil & gas and mining & quarrying sectors, between the different payment types and between the Government Agencies that received those payments. A total of 71 extractive companies participated in compiling the report. The IA has been able to reconcile £2,431 million of those payments to disclosures made by companies. The report shows the breakdown of this sum between companies and is the first time such information has been made available to the public. Information on the unreconciled amounts has also been included in this report. A number of features of the global EITI Standard and how it interacts with the UK legislative framework have presented the MSG and the IA with challenges in meeting the requirements of the EITI requirements. Those features, which are described in more detail within the report, include: Voluntary reporting: The absence of legislation requiring companies to disclose their payments results in UK EITI being a voluntary process for companies. Taxpayer confidentiality: Legislation prevents HMRC from disclosing confidential taxpayer information. HMRC was therefore able to provide information relating to tax payments received only from extractive companies which gave their consent through a waiver of confidentiality. This constraint also had an impact on the MSG’s ability to target the EITI process at companies that made material payments. Oil & Gas Sector Taxes: Companies in the oil & gas sector are subject to a separate fiscal regime on their UK extractive activities. Whilst this separation aids the | Page 5 UK EITI report for 2014 identification of taxes that are within the scope of UK EITI, the payment mechanism established by HMRC enables companies to combine payments that relate to their extractive activities with payments that relate to other activities. This required additional work on the part of HMRC and companies to distinguish the extent to which payments related to the extractive activities. Mining & Quarrying Sector Taxes: There is no separate fiscal regime for UK mining and quarrying activities. For HMRC,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 EITI Report
    Contents List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................6 Executive Summary........................................................................................................................8 1. EITI in Iraq .............................................................................................................................. 14 1.1. About the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) ................................... 14 1.2. EITI Implementation in Iraq .................................................................................................. 14 1.3. EITI Governance and leadership in Iraq (Requirement 1.1 – 1.3) ................................ 16 1.4. MSG Governance (Requirement 1.4) .................................................................................. 17 1.5. MSG Workplan (Requirement 1.5) ....................................................................................... 18 2. Legal Framework and Fiscal Regime for the Extractive Industries (Requirement 2.1) . 20 2.1. National Governance Structures ......................................................................................... 20 2.2. Overview of the regulations applicable to extractive industries ................................. 21 2.2.1. Extractive sector regulations in federal Iraq ........................................................................ 21 2.2.2. Overview of the corporate income tax and withholding tax regimes applicable
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Facilities of Asia and the Pacific," 2007 (Open-File Report 2010-1254)
    Table1.—Attribute data for the map "Mineral Facilities of Asia and the Pacific," 2007 (Open-File Report 2010-1254). [The United States Geological Survey (USGS) surveys international mineral industries to generate statistics on the global production, distribution, and resources of industrial minerals. This directory highlights the economically significant mineral facilities of Asia and the Pacific. Distribution of these facilities is shown on the accompanying map. Each record represents one commodity and one facility type for a single location. Facility types include mines, oil and gas fields, and processing plants such as refineries, smelters, and mills. Facility identification numbers (“Position”) are ordered alphabetically by country, followed by commodity, and then by capacity (descending). The “Year” field establishes the year for which the data were reported in Minerals Yearbook, Volume III – Area Reports: Mineral Industries of Asia and the Pacific. In the “DMS Latitiude” and “DMS Longitude” fields, coordinates are provided in degree-minute-second (DMS) format; “DD Latitude” and “DD Longitude” provide coordinates in decimal degrees (DD). Data were converted from DMS to DD. Coordinates reflect the most precise data available. Where necessary, coordinates are estimated using the nearest city or other administrative district.“Status” indicates the most recent operating status of the facility. Closed facilities are excluded from this report. In the “Notes” field, combined annual capacity represents the total of more facilities, plus additional
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Mine Energy – Unlocking Deployment at Scale in the UK a Mine Energy White Paper
    The Case for Mine Energy – unlocking deployment at scale in the UK A mine energy white paper @northeastlep northeastlep.co.uk @northeastlep northeastlep.co.uk Foreword At the heart of this Government’s agenda are three key priorities: the development of new and innovative sources of employment and economic growth, rapid decarbonisation of our society, and levelling up - reducing the inequalities between diferent parts of the UK. I’m therefore delighted to be able to ofer my support to this report, which, perhaps uniquely, involves an approach which has the potential to address all three of these priorities. Mine energy, the use of the geothermally heated water in abandoned coal mines, is not a new technology, but it is one with the potential to deliver thousands of jobs. One quarter of the UK’s homes and businesses are sited on former coalfields. The Coal Authority estimates that there is an estimated 2.2 GWh of heat available – enough to heat all of these homes and businesses, and drive economic growth in some of the most disadvantaged communities in our country. Indeed, this report demonstrates that if we only implement the 42 projects currently on the Coal Authority’s books, we will deliver almost 4,500 direct jobs and a further 9-11,000 in the supply chain, at the same time saving 90,000 tonnes of carbon. The report also identifies a number of issues which need to be addressed to take full advantage of this opportunity; with investment, intelligence, supply chain development, skills and technical support all needing attention.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom – Extensive Potential and a Positive Outlook by Paul Lusty, British Geological Survey Introduction in Relation
    United Kingdom – extensive potential and a positive outlook By Paul Lusty, British Geological Survey Introduction In relation to its size the United Kingdom (UK) is remarkably well-endowed with mineral resources as a result of its complex geological history. Their extraction and use have played an important role in the development of the UK economy over many years and minerals are currently worked at some 2100 mine and quarry sites. Production is now largely confined to construction minerals, primarily aggregates, energy minerals and industrial minerals including salt, potash, kaolin and fluorspar, although renewed interest in metals is an important development in recent years. With surging global demand for minerals the UK is seen by explorers as an attractive location to develop projects. With low political risk and excellent infrastructure a survey conducted by Resources Stocks (2009) ranked the UK twelfth in a global assessment of countries’ risk profiles for resource sector investment. Northern Ireland is notable in terms of the extensive licence coverage for gold and base metal exploration and in having the UK’s only operational metalliferous mine. The most advanced projects elsewhere include the Hemerdon tin-tungsten deposit in Devon, the South Crofty tin deposit in Cornwall and the Cononish gold deposit in central Scotland. UK coal has seen a resurgence during the last three years driven largely by higher global prices, making it more competitive with imports. Coal is also viewed as having a key role in the future UK energy mix. This has led to greater investment in UK operations resulting in increased numbers of new opencast sites commencing production and more permit applications for further sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery for Scotland Final Report
    Economic impacts of CO Economic Economic impacts of CO 2 enhanced If you require this publication in an alternative format and/or language please contact the oil recovery for Scotland Scottish Enterprise Helpline on 0845 607 8787 to discuss your needs. Scottish Enterprise Final report Atrium Court 50 Waterloo Street 2 Glasgow Scotland for oil recovery enhanced G2 6HQ Helpline: 0845 607 8787 Led by: with and E-mail: [email protected] Element Energy Limited Dundas Consultants The Institute of 78 Margaret Street 7 Queens Gardens Petroleum Engineering www.scottish-enterprise.com London W1W 8SZ Aberdeen Heriot Watt University Tel: 01223 852496 AB15 4YD Edinburgh EH14 4AS Final report SE/3669/Oct12 Authors Harsh Pershad and Emrah Durusut (Element Energy) Alan Crerar and David Black (Dundas Consultants) Eric Mackay and Peter Olden (Heriot Watt University) For comments or queries please contact: Dr. Harsh Pershad [email protected] +44 (0)1223 852 496 Mr. Emrah Durusut [email protected] +44 (0)330 119 0982 Caveat While the authors consider that the data and opinions in this report are sound, all parties must rely on their own judgement and skill when using it. The authors do not make any representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the report. There is considerable uncertainty around the development of oil markets, CCS technology, and CO2-EOR specifically. The available data and models on sources and sinks are extremely limited and the analysis is therefore based on purely hypothetical scenarios. Any maps, tables and graphs are provided for high-level illustrative purposes only; no detailed location-specific studies have been carried out and no oil company has provided detailed decision-making inputs.
    [Show full text]
  • Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2017
    DIGEST OF UNITED KINGDOM ENERGY STATISTICS 2017 July 2017 This document is available in large print, audio and braille on request. Please email [email protected] with the version you require. Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics Enquiries about statistics in this publication should be made to the contact named at the end of the relevant chapter. Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided that the source is fully acknowledged. General enquiries about the publication, and proposals for reproduction of larger extracts, should be addressed to BEIS, at the address given in paragraph XXVIII of the Introduction. The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) reserves the right to revise or discontinue the text or any table contained in this Digest without prior notice This is a National Statistics publication The United Kingdom Statistics Authority has designated these statistics as National Statistics, in accordance with the Statistics and Registration Service Act 2007 and signifying compliance with the UK Statistics Authority: Code of Practice for Official Statistics. Designation can be broadly interpreted to mean that the statistics: ñ meet identified user needs ONCEñ are well explained and STATISTICSreadily accessible HAVE ñ are produced according to sound methods, and BEENñ are managed impartially DESIGNATEDand objectively in the public interest AS Once statistics have been designated as National Statistics it is a statutory NATIONALrequirement that the Code of Practice S TATISTICSshall continue to be observed IT IS © A Crown copyright 2017 STATUTORY You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2012
    Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2012 Production team: Iain MacLeay Kevin Harris Anwar Annut and chapter authors A National Statistics publication London: TSO © Crown Copyright 2012 All rights reserved First published 2012 ISBN 9780115155284 Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics Enquiries about statistics in this publication should be made to the contact named at the end of the relevant chapter. Brief extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided that the source is fully acknowledged. General enquiries about the publication, and proposals for reproduction of larger extracts, should be addressed to Kevin Harris, at the address given in paragraph XXIX of the Introduction. The Department of Energy and Climate Change reserves the right to revise or discontinue the text or any table contained in this Digest without prior notice. About TSO's Standing Order Service The Standing Order Service, open to all TSO account holders, allows customers to automatically receive the publications they require in a specified subject area, thereby saving them the time, trouble and expense of placing individual orders, also without handling charges normally incurred when placing ad-hoc orders. Customers may choose from over 4,000 classifications arranged in 250 sub groups under 30 major subject areas. These classifications enable customers to choose from a wide variety of subjects, those publications that are of special interest to them. This is a particularly valuable service for the specialist library or research body. All publications will be dispatched immediately after publication date. Write to TSO, Standing Order Department, PO Box 29, St Crispins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN, quoting reference 12.01.013.
    [Show full text]
  • Coos County Gas Pipeline Minimal Infrastructure
    CURZON ENERGY PLC 2 IMPORTANT NOTICE By attending this presentation and/or accepting these slides you agree to be bound by the following conditions and It is not intended that the Presentation Materials be distributed or passed on, directly or indirectly, to anyone other will be taken as having represented and undertaken that you have agreed to do so. These presentation slides and than a Relevant Person. Persons of any other description, including those that do not have professional experience in accompanying verbal presentation (“Presentation Materials”) have been prepared by Curzon Energy PLC (“Company”) matters relating to investment, should not rely or act upon the Presentation Materials. Any investment, investment in relation to (i) the proposed acquisition by the Company of Coos Bay Energy LLC, a Nevada corporation which owns activity or controlled activity to which the Presentation Materials may ultimately relate is available only to Relevant coalbed methane gas accumulations in Coos Bay County, Oregon, USA; (ii) the proposed admission of the ordinary Persons and will be engaged in only with such Relevant Persons. share capital of the Company to the Official List (by way of Standard Listing under Chapter 14 of the Listing Rules) and The Presentation Materials are confidential and being supplied to you for your own information and may not be to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s main market for listed securities and (iii) the proposed placing of ordinary reproduced, further distributed, passed on, or the contents otherwise divulged, directly or indirectly, to any other shares in the capital of the Company. The Presentation Materials do not comprise an admission document, listing person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose whatsoever.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Policy Framework for Iraq's Petroleum Industry and An
    Towards a Policy Framework for Iraq’s Petroleum Industry and an Integrated Federal Energy Strategy Submitted by Luay Jawad al-Khatteeb To the University of Exeter As a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Middle East Politics In January 2017 The thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgment. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature ......................................................... i Abstract: The “Policy Framework for Iraq’s Petroleum Industry” is a logical structure that establishes the rules to guide decisions and manage processes to achieve economically efficient outcomes within the energy sector. It divides policy applications between regulatory and regulated practices, and defines the governance of the public sector across the petroleum industry and relevant energy portfolios. In many “Rentier States” where countries depend on a single source of income such as oil revenues, overlapping powers of authority within the public sector between policy makers and operators has led to significant conflicts of interest that have resulted in the mismanagement of resources and revenues, corruption, failed strategies and the ultimate failure of the system. Some countries have succeeded in identifying areas for progressive reform, whilst others failed due to various reasons discussed in this thesis. Iraq fits into the category of a country that has failed to implement reform and has become a classic case of a rentier state.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique UK's Licensing Policy Favours the State Than
    1216-2574 / USD 20.00 ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA © 2013 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 54, No 2, pp. 200–204 (2013) DOI: 10.1556/AJur.54.2013.2.6 MARY SABINA PETERS*−MANU KUMAR** Unique UK’s Licensing Policy Favours the State than the Industry: Contradicting Conventional Wisdom Introduction The world petroleum industry is globally interdependent. International oil companies tend to compare investment opportunities worldwide and pursue global strategies: investment opportunities compete with each other and fashion tends to possess world’s oil companies.1 Under such circumstances the role of the state acting as the regulator is of paramount importance especially where the oil and gas industry is a countries key industry.2 In the United Kingdom the government has proprietary rights to the petroleum reserves but they lack capacity to carry out technical tasks as drilling wells and laying pipelines.3 Consequently, the Governments is compelled to turn to private companies who hold most of the fi nancial and technical means needed for the exploration and exploitation of petroleum resources.4 In the United Kingdom, this symbiotic relationship is given effect through the petroleum licensing mechanism. This paper brings to light the various features of the UK licensing regime consequently bringing to light how this regime is favourable to the state than the industries, by laying emphasis on the proprietary rights to the petroleum revenue which vest in the UK through its governing legislations. Legislation The legislative framework for oil and gas exploration and production activities in the North Sea is as originally established by the Petroleum (Production) Act 1934 for onshore activities, subsequently extended to the UK continental shelf by the Continental Shelf Act 1964 and ultimately consolidated by Part I of the Petroleum Act 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency DIRECTORATE NATIONAL
    Public Disclosure Authorized Major Lessons from My Career By Farouk Al-Kasim Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 1. Why Not Work Together? 2. The Importance of Resource Assessment 3. Input to Norway’s Approach 4. Sector Organization 5. Institutional Integrity 6. Developing Competencies and Capacity 7. Win-win Approach to Resource Management 8. Joint Research to Reduce Risk 9. Transparency 10. Revenue Management 11. Petroleum Linkage to Total Governance 1 Why Not Work Together? 2 Why not work together? >> After graduation in 1957, I joined the Iraq Petroleum Company 1(IPC), which was the operator for an incorporated consortium comprising BP, Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil, Total, and Partex. >> From 1957 to 1972, I followed the bitter negotiations between the Iraqi government and the IPC. I wondered why they could not agree. I was convinced they needed each other, but they simply could not find the way to work together. >> This made me wonder if there was a way for oil companies and governments to work together, rather than waste so much time and energy in conflict. There must be a way! 3 Norway offered a unique opportunity >> On the very first day I arrived in Norway in 1968, I walked to the Ministry of 2Industry in Oslo. I desperately needed a job, and the ministry needed somebody who knew how to assess exploration results. In 1965, Norway had licensed 78 blocks in the North Sea. The government made it clear that international oil companies (IOCs) were needed in Norway. >> Norwegians, however, were skeptical about petroleum operations in the North Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4Th Conference Volume 1 Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4Th Conference
    Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4th Conference Volume 1 Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4th Conference held at the Barbican Centre, London 29 March-1 April 1992 Volume 1 edited by J. R. Parker Shell UK Exploration and Production, London with I. D. Bartholomew Oryx UK Energy Company, Uxbridge W. G. Cordey Shell UK Exploration and Production, London R. E. Dunay Mobil North Sea Limited, London O. Eldholm University of Oslo A. J. Fleet BP Research, Sunbury A. J. Fraser BP Exploration, Glasgow K. W. Glennie Consultant, Ballater J. H. Martin Imperial College, London M. L. B. Miller Petroleum Science and Technology Institute, Edinburgh C. D. Oakman Reservoir Research Limited, Glasgow A. M. Spencer Statoil, Stavanger M. A. Stephenson Enterprise Oil, London B. A. Vining Esso Exploration and Production UK Limited, Leatherhead T. J. Wheatley Total Oil Marine pic, Aberdeen - 1993 Published by The Geological Society London THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY The Society was founded in 1807 as The Geological Society of London and is the oldest geological society in the world. It received its Royal Charter in 1825 for the purpose of 'investigating the mineral structure of the Earth'. The Society is Britain's national learned society for geology with a membership of 7500 (1992). It has countrywide coverage and approximately 1000 members reside overseas. The Society is responsible for all aspects of the geological sciences including professional matters. The Society has its own publishing house which produces the Society's international journals, books and maps, and which acts as the European distributor for publications of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists and the Geological Society of America.
    [Show full text]