Capital.Hill.NEW-0720No Logos:Layout 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Capital.Hill.NEW-0720No Logos:Layout 1 Capitol Hill Quarterly www.aps.org/public_affairs/chq A PUBLICATION FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY WWW.APS.ORG • JULY 2006 • V O L U M E 1 , N O . 2 US high energy physics at risk, says NAS study This is an exciting time in several priorities for US particle Harold Shapiro, an economist in place for the future. “When we particle physics, and the physics in the next 15 years. and former President of Princeton looked at the status of high-ener- United States should increase The main recommendations, University, chaired the NRC’s gy physics in the US, we were its investment in the field to in priority order, are: Committee on Elementary sobered,” he said. “We had no maintain leadership, says a • First, support American sci- Particle Physics in the 21st compelling follow-on program.” National Academy of entists working at the Large Century which drafted the report. The report says that the US Sciences report released in Hadron Collider (LHC) in He announced the panel’s recom- should play a leadership role in the April. Geneva, Switzerland. mendations at a press conference worldwide effort to study The report, titled • Second, invest in the neces- April 26 in Washington. Terascale physics, and accelera- Revealing the Hidden sary research and development Not only will, several major tors are an essential component of Nature of Space and Time, in order to make a compelling bid particle physics experiments come this effort. observed that the field of to host the International Linear to an end shortly, the committee The panel recommends spend- particle physics is now at Collider (ILC). noted. Fermilab, the flagship of ing $300 to $500 million over the a crossroads, as several • Third, expand the program in US particle physics, is scheduled next five years on research and major experiments are particle astrophysics and pursue to shut down around 2010. development for the accelerator scheduled to end soon. an internationally coordinated Shapiro said he had been disap- for the proposed International The report identified pointed to learn that no plan was Linear Collider. The panel also program in neutrino physics. See REPORT on page 2 Physicist pulls some strings on the Hill Alan Alda (left) talks with Brian Greene and Rep. Judy Biggert (IIl-13th) after the lecture. n May, Columbia University Congress, Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) lars to construct a gigantic facility actually works, Newton declared Greene quipped.) string theorist and author of the and Rep. Vern Ehlers (R-MI). Actor to detect exotic things we can't even that he would leave this question to Most importantly, Einstein laid Ibestselling book, The Elegant Alan Alda, a strong proponent of observe directly. He did so via a the consideration of the reader. out a testable prediction that light Universe, Brian Greene appeared science, was also in attendance. story, namely, Einstein's persistence Albert Einstein took up the chal- would follow the curvature of space- at a special reception on Capitol The timing of Greene’s talk in developing general relativity over lenge. According to Greene, time, and this was borne out in 1919 Hill to talk to Congressional repre- couldn’t have been more fortuitous, the course of 10 long years. Einstein kept asking why, pushing by observations made during an sentatives and their staffers about the coming as it did on the heels of the First published in the mid-17th the envelope further, and in the eclipse. Like Einstein 100 years future of physics research. Audience recently released report of the Century, Isaac Newton’s Principia process, he revolutionized physics. ago, Greene hopes the scientific members included former NSF National Academies’ Committee on is among the most significant Newton believed gravity was a community won’t be content to sit director Neal Lane, Michael Turner, Elementary Particle Physics in the physics treatises ever written. He force, one object exerting a pull on back on its laurels, but will keep ask- the former Assistant Director of the 21st Century, which makes the case mapped out the law of universal another by virtue of their respective ing those fundamental questions to NSF for Mathematical and Physical for funding the next generation of gravity so precisely, that we can masses. Einstein figured out how it push the envelope of scientific Sciences, DOE’s Ray Orbach, particle accelerators. still use his fundamental equations worked: an object’s mass warps the knowledge to the next “final fron- Greene s fellow string theorist Greene provided an excellent today to predict where a ball tossed fabric of spacetime, and this makes tier.” Funding the next-generation Edward Witten, and the only two answer to the inevitable question: in the air will land. But when it us feel the effects of gravity. (“Some collider is one way of ensuring con- physicists currently serving in why spend billions of taxpayer dol- came to explaining how gravity of us feel it more than others,” tinued progress. Nuclear power expert testifies on safety and non-proliferation APS helps boy scouts Global electricity demand is for the production of fissionable “The intent of our report is to explore nuclear science expected to increase by more than material for nuclear weapons. That provide an informative, education- 50 percent by 2025 and nuclear combination of facts led the APS al document to help Congress see With the help of the APS Scouts for a long time. He power is a primary carbon-free Panel on Public Affairs (POPA) to the technical details supporting the Division of Nuclear is an Eagle Scout energy source for meeting that mas- issue a report titled Nuclear Power issue, independent of any political Physics (DNP) Education (though he never sive expansion. But, Iran and North and Proliferation Resistance: agendas,” said Hagengruber, Committee, the Boy earned the Atomic Korea clarify the challenge: tech- Securing Benefits, Limiting Risks. emphasizing that the report is “a Scouts of America has Energy merit badge), nologies used in peaceful nuclear Nuclear energy has long been consensus document,” and there revised its Atomic and now has a son who viewed with suspicion by the gen- were some dissenting voices during Energy merit badge pro- is a Boy Scout. power programs could be diverted eral public because of various health discussions. gram. The new merit He and the DNP Edu- and safety concerns, but over the The consensus that emerged badge, now called “Nuclear cation Committee wrote to On the Back Page last decade, there has been a notice- focused on four main points: Science,” updates the program and the Boy Scouts of America, offer- • Senator Pete V. Domenici able shift in public perception, • Safeguards technologies (see increases the emphasis on science. ing to help revise the handbook, discusses… Meeting our according to Roger Hagengruber sidebar on page 3) are the first line Howard Matis, a nuclear physi- long-term energy needs (University of New Mexico), who of defense against proliferation. cist at Lawrence Berkeley Lab and See SCOUTS on page 2 through Federal chaired the APS report. Nuclear The current international safeguards member of the DNP research and energy is a viable option to car- program run by IAEA largely Education Committee, bon-based energy sources, in light installs technologies that are the noticed that the Atomic development of mounting public concern about result of R&D carried out by the Energy merit badge pro- global warming. Other countries United States 10-20 years ago. The gram needed updating recognize the value of nuclear ener- program in safeguards R&D needs when a local scout troop gy and worldwide, more than thir- to be revitalized. visited his lab. ty new nuclear plants are under Matis has been See NUCLEAR EXPERT on page 3 construction. involved with the Boy 2 • July 2006 APS Capitol Hill Quarterly APS Members in the Media This Quarter in Physics History “We were all scientists and therefore “It’s amazing we are so uncertain about July 1977: MRI uses fundamental physics for clinical diagnosis really understood and appreciated the the most abundant substance on Earth. value this would bring to our colleagues I have a feeling that, with water, there in Iraq.” will be more surprises.” n July 3, 1977, the first state to the other. He called his Barrett Ripin (MD-8th), US Anders Nilsson, Stanford University magnetic resonance method molecular beam magnet- Department of State, on the Iraqi Virtual (CA-14th), on the structure of water. Science Library. (May 22, 2006) (March 10, 2006) Oimaging (MRI) exam on ic resonance. a live human patient was per- Rabi and his team modified formed. MRI, which identifies the molecular beam apparatus so the beam was also exposed to a “This is a good example of something “ There are good reasons to think that atoms by how they behave in a which is very counterintuitive that the the [Linear Hadron Collider] will pro- magnetic field, has become an radio frequency signal as it trav- laws of nature permit.” duce major discoveries.” extremely useful non-invasive eled through the magnetic field. -Robert Boyd, University of Rochester Michael Dine, University of California, method for imagining internal Tuning either the external mag- (NY-28th), on a method of making light Santa Cruz (CA-17th). (April 12, 2006) bodily structures and diagnosing netic field or the radio frequen- travel backwards. (May 16, 2006) disease. The life-saving medical cy can produce resonance. They technique has its foundations in observed the first magnetic res- the work of physicist I. I. Rabi, onance absorption in 1938, with “Many students have a fear of science, “They're not just Shiva the Destroyer; who during the 1930s developed beam of lithium chloride mole- but if they come at it from a different they're Brahma the Creator.” a method of measuring magnet- An image of a brain cules.
Recommended publications
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, J
    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, J. Robert Oppenheimer Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 17 March 2021 Version 1.47 Title word cross-reference $1 [Duf46]. $12.95 [Edg91]. $13.50 [Tho03]. $14.00 [Hug07]. $15.95 [Hen81]. $16.00 [RS06]. $16.95 [RS06]. $17.50 [Hen81]. $2.50 [Opp28g]. $20.00 [Hen81, Jor80]. $24.95 [Fra01]. $25.00 [Ger06]. $26.95 [Wol05]. $27.95 [Ger06]. $29.95 [Goo09]. $30.00 [Kev03, Kle07]. $32.50 [Edg91]. $35 [Wol05]. $35.00 [Bed06]. $37.50 [Hug09, Pol07, Dys13]. $39.50 [Edg91]. $39.95 [Bad95]. $8.95 [Edg91]. α [Opp27a, Rut27]. γ [LO34]. -particles [Opp27a]. -rays [Rut27]. -Teilchen [Opp27a]. 0-226-79845-3 [Guy07, Hug09]. 0-8014-8661-0 [Tho03]. 0-8047-1713-3 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1714-1 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1721-4 [Edg91]. 0-8047-1722-2 [Edg91]. 0-9672617-3-2 [Bro06, Hug07]. 1 [Opp57f]. 109 [Con05, Mur05, Nas07, Sap05a, Wol05, Kru07]. 112 [FW07]. 1 2 14.99/$25.00 [Ber04a]. 16 [GHK+96]. 1890-1960 [McG02]. 1911 [Meh75]. 1945 [GHK+96, Gow81, Haw61, Bad95, Gol95a, Hew66, She82, HBP94]. 1945-47 [Hew66]. 1950 [Ano50]. 1954 [Ano01b, GM54, SZC54]. 1960s [Sch08a]. 1963 [Kuh63]. 1967 [Bet67a, Bet97, Pun67, RB67]. 1976 [Sag79a, Sag79b]. 1981 [Ano81]. 20 [Goe88]. 2005 [Dre07]. 20th [Opp65a, Anoxx, Kai02].
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 March Meeting Program Guide
    MARCHMEETING2018 LOS ANGELES MARCH 5-9 PROGRAM GUIDE #apsmarch aps.org/meetingapp aps.org/meetings/march Senior Editor: Arup Chakraborty Robert T. Haslam Professor of Chemical Engineering; Professor of Chemistry, Physics, and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT Now welcoming submissions in the Physics of Living Systems Submit your best work at elifesci.org/physics-living-systems Image: D. Bonazzi (CC BY 2.0) Led by Senior Editor Arup Chakraborty, this dedicated new section of the open-access journal eLife welcomes studies in which experimental, theoretical, and computational approaches rooted in the physical sciences are developed and/or applied to provide deep insights into the collective properties and function of multicomponent biological systems and processes. eLife publishes groundbreaking research in the life and biomedical sciences. All decisions are made by working scientists. WELCOME t is a pleasure to welcome you to Los Angeles and to the APS March I Meeting 2018. As has become a tradition, the March Meeting is a spectacular gathering of an enthusiastic group of scientists from diverse organizations and backgrounds who have broad interests in physics. This meeting provides us an opportunity to present exciting new work as well as to learn from others, and to meet up with colleagues and make new friends. While you are here, I encourage you to take every opportunity to experience the amazing science that envelops us at the meeting, and to enjoy the many additional professional and social gatherings offered. Additionally, this is a year for Strategic Planning for APS, when the membership will consider the evolving mission of APS and where we want to go as a society.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Falcone Chosen As Vice President of APS for 2016
    August/September 2015 • Vol. 24, No. 8 A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY PhysTEC Grows Page 4 WWW.APS.ORG/PUBLICATIONS/APSNEWS Roger Falcone Chosen as Vice President of APS for 2016 By Emily Conover ident-elect, Homer Neal, will APS members took to the polls assume the position of president. in May and June to select new The current vice president, Laura leadership, and the votes have been Greene, will become president- tallied. The majority of voters in elect, and Falcone will assume the annual general election chose the vice presidency. Falcone will Roger Falcone to fill the office of become president of the Society vice president beginning January in 2018. “I’m very pleased to be able to Roger Falcone James Hollenhorst Deborah Jin Johanna Stachel Bonnie Fleming 1, 2016. Falcone, a professor of Vice President Treasurer Chair-Elect International Councilor General Councilor physics at the University of Califor- serve the Society and the physicists Nominating Committee nia, Berkeley, is the director of the within APS,” Falcone said. “I will is carried out,” Falcone said in his horst, senior director of technology of the APS.” Advanced Light Source, an x-ray be spending a lot of time listening, candidate statement. for Agilent Technologies, will be In his candidate statement, synchrotron facility at Lawrence to understand the work of the APS The election is the first since the the first elected treasurer of APS. Hollenhorst cited sound financial Berkeley National Laboratory. more close-up, and also hearing corporate reform that was instituted Past president Malcolm Beasley is management as a top priority.
    [Show full text]
  • APS News, August-September 2019, Vol. 28, No. 8
    STEP UP Preparing for Careers Leroy Apker Back Page: Openness and 02│ for Change 03│ with PIPELINE 05│ Award Finalists 08│ Security in Research Aug./Sept. 2019 • Vol. 28, No. 8 aps.org/apsnews A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY HONORS JOURNALS 2020 APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Physical Review Research Research Awarded to Myriam P. Sarachik Publishes its First Papers BY DAVID VOSS o launch its inaugural issue, Physical Review Research has hysicist Myriam P. Sarachik electron systems. I am very pleased has been selected to receive that she will receive the APS Medal T published its first content the 2020 APS Medal for for Exceptional Achievement in less than two months since opening P for submissions in June. Exceptional Achievement in Research. I’m especially pleased Research for her “fundamental that this honor goes to someone Demonstrating the journal’s contributions to the physics of who has also been so active in broad, multidisciplinary scope electronic transport in solids and promoting the core values of APS. covering all of physics and related molecular magnetism.” Not only is Myriam a past President fields of interest to the physics An APS Fellow, Sarachik is of the Society; she is also well- community, the first release of Distinguished Professor of Physics known for her efforts to defend peer-reviewed research articles at City College of New York. She human rights and the principles of includes advances in the areas of was President of APS in 2003 and diversity and inclusion in physics.” materials science, quantum infor- received the APS Oliver E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evil We Were Interested in Pushing Out
    To the Trustees: The article contained in this number of the Confi- dential Monthly Report was written by George V. Gray of our staff and is of such unusual interest that I am sure all the Trustees will want to read it carefully. Whether the release of atomic energy in the long run will result in good or evil for the race, no one can now say; but whatever the consequences, the Foundation and its related boards cannot escape their share of the responsibility, indirect as it may be. The atomic bomb is the result of influences which, for the most part uninten- tionally and unwittingly, we helped to set in motion, because we were interested in pushing out the boundaries of knowledge, It is a tragic irony that when men have been most successful in the pursuit of truth, they have most endangered the possi- bility of human life on this planet. The towering question which faces the world now is whether the new energies can be controlled. It is, I know, the hope of all of us that the Foundation may be able to make some contribution, however slight, to this end. Raymond B. Fosdick CONTENTS THE ATOMIC BOMB AND THE ROCKEFELLER BOARDS Former Fellows Who Worked on the Bomb . 1 "Fortune Favors the Prepared Mind". ... 2 Tools That Pioneered the Job .5 Activities at Columbia and Princeton . 6 Discoveries at California 8 The Giant Magnet Goes into Action ... .10 The Metallurgical Laboratory 13 The Los Alamos Laboratory . .16 Medical Aspects 17 A Jiist of the Former Fellows 20 THE ATOMIC BOMB AND THE ROCKEFELLER BOARDS Many agencies - universities, industrial corporations, and other civilian organizations and individuals - shared in the vast teamwork which produced the atomic bomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Oppenheimer: a Life April 22, 1904-February 18, 1967
    Oppenheimer: A Life April 22, 1904-February 18, 1967 an online centennial exhibit of J. Robert Oppenheimer http://ohst.berkeley.edu/oppenheimer/exhibit/ This print edition of the online exhibit is free for use, reproduction, and distribution for educational purposes as long as this cover page and the acknowlegments page are included. It may not be altered or sold. For other usage questions, please contact the Office for History of Science and Technology, Univer- sity of California, Berkeley, at http://ohst.berkeley.edu. All image copyrights are retained by their hold- ers. © 2004 by The Regents of the University of California. 1 Oppenheimer: A Life April 22, 1904-February 18, 1967 Introduction As Alice Kimball Smith and Charles Weiner have noted, “Part of Oppenheimer’s attraction, at first for his friends and later for the public, was that he did not project the popularly held image of the scientist as cold, objective, rational and therefore above human frailty, an image that scientists themselves fostered by underplaying their per- sonal histories and the disorder that precedes the neat scientific conclusion.” There is a cacophony of conflicting descriptions of Oppenheimer – as friends have remembered him, as historians have analyzed him. He has been labeled both warm and cold, friendly and condescending, affable as well as hurtful. Learning Sanskrit and cultivating the air of an aesthete, as a young professor he stretched the bounds of the scientist’s persona. Yet in the space of a decade, the otherworldly theorist was transformed into a political insider par excellence. His fellow scientists remembered him as a visionary and capable leader at Los Alamos, while his security hearing brought to light foolish mistakes in judgment and human relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguished Lecture Series in Physics and Astronomy Making an Impact
    University of South Carolina Department of Physics and Astronomy 2018 regularly exceeds 200 people, and for several lectures, we have had standing room only in the 500-seat performance hall located in the Darla Moore School of Business. In addition to presenting a public lecture, every visiting speaker is scheduled for a range of informal meetings or lunches with students, faculty, and researchers. Over the past year, we were treated to an especially distinguished slate of scholars. The president of the American Physical Society at the time, Dr. Laura Greene, explained the bizarre nature of high- temperature superconductivity. Dr. Greene is the Chief Scientist at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Tallahassee, Florida and is also the Francis Eppes Professor of Physics at Florida State University. She illuminated the audience with a review of superconductivity and the behavior of this unconventional superconductivity. Next, the recipient of the 2014 Nobel Prize in chemistry, Dr. William E. Moerner, described the promise and challenges of super resolution microscopy. Dr. Moerner is the Harry S. Mosher Professor of Chemistry and a Professor of Applied Physics at Stanford University. He revealed how super resolution microscopy enabled single molecule imaging and what discoveries it may unveil in the future. 2017 Nobel laureate Dr. Barry Barish describes the unique signatures of the general Only four months after being awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in theory of relativity contained in the first gravitational waves that were detected by physics, Dr. Barry Barish presented evidence for the first detection of Advanced LIGO in 2015. gravitational waves caused by merging black holes.
    [Show full text]
  • Feynman's Struggle and Dyson's Surprise
    Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge Proceedings 5 Adrian Wüthrich: Feynman’s Struggle and Dyson’s Surprise: The Development and Early Appli- cation of a New Means of Representation In: Shaul Katzir, Christoph Lehner and Jürgen Renn (eds.): Traditions and Transforma- tions in the History of Quantum Physics : Third International Conference on the History of Quantum Physics, Berlin, June 28 – July 2, 2010 Online version at http://edition-open-access.de/proceedings/5/ ISBN 978-3-8442-5134-0 First published 2013 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Printed and distributed by: Neopubli GmbH, Berlin http://www.epubli.de/shop/buch/28021 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 11 Feynman’s Struggle and Dyson’s Surprise: The Development and Early Application of a New Means of Representation Adrian Wüthrich Around the year 1948, Richard Phillips Feynman (1918–1988) began to use a particular kind of diagram for the theoretical treatment of recalcitrant problems in the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED), that is, the calculation of the self-energy of the electron. Soon thereafter, these so-called Feynman diagrams became a ubiquitous tool in theoretical elementary particle physics. In this contribution, I first briefly sketch how Feynman diagrams are used today, how they are most often interpreted and how their genesis is usually de- scribed, see sec.
    [Show full text]
  • John A. Wheeler 1911–2008
    John A. Wheeler 1911–2008 A Biographical Memoir by Kip S. Thorne ©2019 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. JOHN ARCHIBALD WHEELER July 9, 1911–April 13, 2008 Elected to the NAS, 1952 John Archibald Wheeler was a theoretical physicist who worked on both down- to-earth projects and highly speculative ideas, and always emphasized the importance of experiment and observation, even when speculating wildly. His research and insights had large impacts on nuclear and particle physics, the design of nuclear weapons, general relativity and relativistic astrophysics, and quantum gravity and quantum information. But his greatest impacts were through the students, postdocs, and mature physicists whom he educated and inspired. Photography by AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives Photography by AIP Emilio Segrè He was guided by what he called the “principle of radical conservatism, ”inspired by Niels Bohr: Base your research on well-established physical laws (be conservative), but By Kip S. Thorne push them into the most extreme conceivable domains (be radical). He often pushed far beyond the boundaries of well understood physics, speculating in prescient ways that inspired future generations of physicists. After completing his PhD. with Karl Herzfeld at Johns Hopkins University (1933), Wheeler embarked on a postdoctoral year with Gregory Breit at New York University (NYU) and another with Niels Bohr in Copenhagen. He then moved to a three-year assistant professorship at the University of North Carolina (1935–1937), followed by a 40-year professorial career at Princeton University (1937–1976) and then ten years as a professor at the University of Texas, Austin (1976–1987).
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Radar Meteorology: People, Technology, and Theory
    A History of Radar Meteorology: People, Technology, and Theory Jeff Duda Overview • Will cover the period from just before World War II through about 1980 – Pre-WWII – WWII – 1940s post-WWII – 1950s – 1960s – 1970s 2 3 Pre-World War II • Concept of using radio waves established starting in the very early 1900s (Tesla) • U.S. Navy (among others) tried using CW radio waves as a “trip beam” to detect presence of ships • First measurements of ionosphere height made in 1924 and 1925 – E. V. Appleton and M. A. F. Barnett of Britain on 11 December 1924 – Merle A. Tuve (Johns Hopkins) and Gregory Breit (Carnegie Inst.) in July 1925 • First that used pulsed energy instead of CW 4 Pre-World War II • Robert Alexander Watson Watt • “Death Ray” against Germans • Assignment given to Arnold F. “Skip” Wilkins: – “Please calculate the amount of radio frequency power which should be radiated to raise the temperature of eight pints of water from 98 °F to 105 °F at a distance of 5 km and a height of 1 km.” – Not feasible with current power production Watson Watt 5 Pre-World War II • Watson Watt and Wilkins pondered whether radio waves could be used merely to detect aircraft • Memo drafted by Watson Watt on February 12, 1935: “Detection of Aircraft by Radio Methods” – Memo earned Watson Watt the title of “the father of radar” – Term “RADAR” officially coined as an acronym by U.S. Navy Lt. Cmdr. Samuel M. Tucker and F. R. Furth in November 1940 • The Daventry experiment – February 26, 1935 – First recorded detection of aircraft by radio waves – Began the full-speed-ahead
    [Show full text]
  • The Weapons Program
    The Weapons Program AUTHORS Richard D. Baker (Plutonium) received a B.S. in chemical engineering from South Dakota School of Mines in 1936 and a Ph.D. in physical chemistry from Iowa State University in 1941. He came to Los Alamos from Chicago in 1943 to join the Chemistry and Metallurgy Division. His research and development on the preparation of plutonium and enriched uranium metal led to the patent for the production of plutonium metal on a multigram scale. Because of the importance and challenge of the materials research. he remained at Los Alamos after the war ended. He was a Group Leader in the Chemistry and Metallurgy Division from 1945 to 1956 and then became Leader of the newly formed Chemistry-Materials Science Division, which was involved in materials research and development for most of the Laboratory’s programs. He became Associate Director for Weapons in 1979 and Associate Director for National Security Programs a few months later. He retired from the Laboratory in May 1981 but continues serving the Laboratory as a consultant. Merle E. Bunker (Early Reactors) participated in the Manhattan Project as a chemical technician at Decatur. Illinois. where the diffusion-barrier tubes for the Oak Ridge gaseous diffusion plant were produced. He received his scientific training at Purdue University (B.S. in mechanical engineering. 1946) and Indiana University (Ph.D. in nuclear physics, 1950). He joined the Los Alamos staff in 1950. attracted here by the high reputation of the Laboratory, which he learned about from friends already working at Los Alamos. and by a strong desire to live in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • The Zitterbewegung Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
    The Zitterbewegung Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Jean Louis Van Belle, Drs, MAEc, BAEc, BPhil March 2019 Cover picture by Jason Hise “Bring forward what is true. Write it so that it is clear. Defend it to your last breath.” ― Ludwig Boltzmann Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Wild games ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Tame games .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Real games ................................................................................................................................................ 2 So, what is it all about? ............................................................................................................................. 5 For the professional physicist ................................................................................................................... 6 I. Prolegomena ......................................................................................................................................... 9 The nature of space and time ................................................................................................................... 9 The Theory of Everything: U = 0 ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]