DOCSLIB.ORG

UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Anthropological Turn in French Thought: The 1970s to the Present Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3p75q9p5 Author Collins, Jacob Joseph Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Anthropological Turn in French Thought: The 1970s to the Present A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Jacob Joseph Collins 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Anthropological Turn in French Thought: The 1970s to the Present by Jacob Joseph Collins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Lynn Hunt, Chair This dissertation focuses on post-1968 French thought and looks at how French thinkers responded to a new set of challenges that emerged in the 1970s and 80s: the economy had begun to falter, the revolts of 68 failed to produce an alternative to capitalism, and the “great ideologies” that had once sustained cultural life in France – Catholicism, communism, and Gaullism – no longer mobilized people in the same way. I argue that philosophers and social theorists met these challenges by reconceiving the language of politics, using concepts and methodologies associated with anthropology to do so. They wanted to rediscover the roots of political sentiments and social bonds as a way of understanding how they had gone so astray in the twentieth century. Much of their writing was focused on the legacy of totalitarianism, the role of religion in contemporary life – which they all took to be of first importance – the fragmentation of political identities with the advent of globalization, and the persistent social inequalities that attend modern democracy. The thinkers I examine cover the entire ideological spectrum: on the far left, Régis Debray, a revolutionary in the 1960s turned militant republican in iii the 70s; on the center-left Emmanuel Todd, demographer, political liberal, and sharp-eyed critic of neo-liberalism; on the center-right, Marcel Gauchet, former left-libertarian turned theorist of democracy; and on the far right, Alain de Benoist, architect of the “New Right” movement, cultural essentialist, and implacable critic of egalitarianism. I show how each thinker constructed a meta-narrative of modernity, and how, in spite of their political differences, they came to see fundamental issues in similar ways. iv The dissertation of Jacob Joseph Collins is approved. Kirstie McClure Perry Anderson Lynn Hunt, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2013 v Contents Acknowledgements vii Vita viii Introduction 1 Chapter One – The Anthropological Turn in French Thought 11 Chapter Two – Alain de Benoist: A Restorationist Anthropology 50 Chapter Three – Marcel Gauchet: Anthropologies of the Liberal State 103 Chapter Four – Family Trees: Emmanuel Todd and the Roots of a Gallic Liberalism 172 Chapter Five – Tracking the Sacred: The Political Anthropology of Régis Debray 233 Chapter Six – Legacies of the Sacred: The Political Anthropology of Régis Debray 305 Concluding Remarks 368 Bibliography 383 vi Acknowledgements In writing this dissertation, I have benefited greatly from the advice and friendship of many people. I would like to thank Lynn Hunt for being an extraordinary adviser. I have profited enormously from her generous feedback throughout the writing process, and from her peerless example as an historian. I thank Perry Anderson for the many ways he encouraged me during the writing of this dissertation, and for the untiring attention he gave to it. I would like to thank Robert Brenner, Saul Friedländer, Margaret Jacob, Kirstie McClure, Ted Porter, and Teo Ruiz for their continuing support. I owe many debts to fellow graduate students at UCLA, who contributed in various ways to the making of this dissertation: my good friends, Aaron Benanav, Susan Mokhberi, and Alexander Zevin; fellow French historians, Elizabeth Everton, Sung Choi, Lauren Janes, Deb Bauer, and Alexia Yates. In France, Laure Fernandez and Quentin Dève were outstanding hosts and roommates. I want to thank Susan Watkins and Tony Wood at New Left Review for their insightful comments on my work. Special thanks go out to my family for their love and support, and of course, to Naomi, for everything. vii VITA Education M.A. with distinction, European History, UCLA, 2006 B.A., cum laude in History, major in Philosophy, Cornell University, 2003 Publications “States of Security”, New Left Review 81 (forthcoming, May-June 2013) “An Anthropological Turn: The Unseen Paradigm in Modern French Thought”, New Left Review 78 (November-December 2012), pp. 31-61 “A Metaphysics of Democracy”, New Left Review 74 (March-April 2012), pp. 145-155 “Link Arms!”, New Left Review 64 (July-August 2010), pp. 131-139 “Days of the Commune”, The Evergreen Review 118 (June 2009) Conferences October 2009, Western Society for French History, “The Political Anthropology of Régis Debray and the Return of the Nation-State” October 2012, UCLA French Graduate Conference, “Disappearing Selves: Autobiography and Counter-Autobiography in the French Tradition” viii Introduction This dissertation identifies and unfolds the making of a new paradigm in post-1968 French thought, the “anthropological turn.” It follows the work of four thinkers, Régis Debray, Emmanuel Todd, Marcel Gauchet, and Alain de Benoist, all non-anthropologists who nevertheless attempted to reconstruct the foundations of political theory with reference to anthropological concepts and methodologies in the 1970s. The questions they wanted to answer – what is politics?, what constitutes a true political community?, what is the role of human agency in the context of the group? – were given renewed urgency in the aftermath of 1968. Anthropology was an obvious place to look for thinkers who wanted to breathe new life into their field of study, both for its prestige in post-war France, and for its attention to origins. We thus find each author giving an anthropological interpretation of politics, in many cases identifying politics as a reified entity – “the political”, analogous to the “social” or the “economic” – and tracing it back to “primitive” society. For Emmanuel Todd, to use one example, anthropological politics was rooted in pre-modern family structures, which continue, in spite of their antiquity, to shape social relations and ideological formations in modernity. The itineraries of these four thinkers were very different, as were their particular fusions of the political and the anthropological, but the fact that they all considered, at the very same moment, this fusion necessary signals the existence of an important current of thought that has yet to be explored. The dissertation before you is a work of intellectual history, and, in keeping with its methods, tries to interpret and contextualize the published writings of some of France’s leading thinkers. I have given a stronger contextual reading than is customary for intellectual history, relating developments in philosophy and political theory very closely with events, crises, and 1 discourses in the period between May 68 and the election of Mitterrand in 1981 – the “entre- deux-Mai” as it is sometimes called. If I have insisted on such a strong link between political events and theory, it is because the world-historical singularity of the post-war French intellectual moment,1 the enormous diffusion and popular resonance of its ideas from 1945 to 1980, invites us to look beyond the text for its meanings. The first chapter deals at length with the intellectual scaffolding of the anthropological turn, its core themes and methodologies, as well as its contribution to the field of political philosophy in France. Here I would say only that the anthropological turn represents a way of thinking about political questions that deviates from what many of us expect to find in post-68 French thought. It reinstates the mode of “grand-narrative” that Lyotard famously claimed post- modern philosophy to have surpassed. The respective work of these four thinkers feature great syntheses of events and ideas that stretch back to the origins of human society, with specific views on the forms politics will take in the present and future. In this regard, it marks a return to the “savage” political theory of Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Diderot, but within a distinctive late-capitalist, post-structuralist context. The latter component is essential for appreciating how the anthropological turn attempted to negotiate an urgent theoretical problem of its time, namely the confrontation of structuralism (and its attention to impersonal social mechanisms), with new demands for “agency” and “practice” within the ambit of the human sciences. The anthropological turn suggests its own way of balancing history, practice, and structure to yield a theory of politics.2 1 This view is expressed forcefully by Alain Badiou in “The Adventure of French Philosophy,” New Left Review 35 (Sept.-Oct. 2005): 67-77. With classical Greece and enlightenment Germany, Badiou names post-war France as one of the three greatest “moments” of intense philosophical production. 2 The work of both Pierre Bourdieu and Marshall Sahlins in the 1970s and 80s were benchmarks in terms of resolving this impasse. See Pierre Bourdieu, The Logic of Practice, trans. Richard Nice (Stanford: Stanford 2 All four thinkers considered here were part of the same post-war generation. The eldest, Debray (b. 1940), is eleven years the senior of Todd (b. 1951), the youngest of the group, while Benoist (b. 1943) and Gauchet (b. 1946) fall roughly in the middle. The left-wing figures, Debray and Todd, were born and raised in Paris, though with different kinds of middle-class backgrounds. Todd descends from an illustrious literary-bohemian line, his grandfather the great communist writer of the interwar period, Paul Nizan, his father the well-known author and journalist, Olivier Todd. The family had strong ties to England, as Nizan’s wife was English, and both Olivier and Emmanuel were sent to Cambridge for university.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Louis Rougier : Vie Et Œuvre D'un Philosophe Engagé
    Philosophia Scientiæ Travaux d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences CS 7 | 2007 Louis Rougier : vie et œuvre d'un philosophe engagé Louis Rougier : itinéraire intellectuel et politique, des années vingt à Nouvelle École Olivier Dard Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/429 DOI : 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.429 ISSN : 1775-4283 Éditeur Éditions Kimé Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 janvier 2007 Pagination : 50-64 ISBN : 978-2-84174-412-1 ISSN : 1281-2463 Référence électronique Olivier Dard, « Louis Rougier : itinéraire intellectuel et politique, des années vingt à Nouvelle École », Philosophia Scientiæ [En ligne], CS 7 | 2007, mis en ligne le 08 juin 2011, consulté le 15 janvier 2021. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/429 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ philosophiascientiae.429 Tous droits réservés Louis Rougier : itinéraire intellectuel et politique, des années vingt à Nouvelle École Olivier Dard CRULH - Université Paul Verlaine - Metz Depuis sa mort, Louis Rougier (1889-1982) est largement oublié par le débat public et l’historiographie. Les libéraux en particulier, dont Rou- gier fut un des hérauts ne se sont guère réclamés de son héritage, à l’exception de Maurice Allais [Allais 1990]. La dimension sulfureuse at- tachée au personnage et liée à ses sympathies vichyssoises (qu’il faut remettre en perspective) comme à sa proximité avec la Nouvelle droite1 n’ont sans doute rien arrangé. C’est quoi qu’il en soit Alain de Benoist, fondateur et principal animateur de la Nouvelle droite et qui fut à la fois un intime et un disciple philosophique de Rougier au début des années 60 qui a perpétué le plus fidèlement son héritage en rééditant certains de ses livres avec des préfaces substantielles.2 Du côté de l’historiogra- phie, l’éclairage sur Rougier se limite à deux épisodes principaux : sa participation au néo-libéralisme de l’entre-deux-guerres et au colloque Philosophia Scientiæ, Cahier spécial 7, 2007, 50–64.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Polanyi and Early Neoliberalism
    MICHAEL POLANYI AND EARLY NEOLIBERALISM Martin Beddeleem Keywords: Friedrich Hayek, Louis Rougier, Michael Polanyi, Mont-Pèlerin Society, neoliberalism, planning, Walter Lippmann ABSTRACT1 Between the late 1930s and the 1950s, Michael Polanyi came in close contact with a diverse cast of intellectuals seeking a renewal of the liberal doctrine. The elaboration of this “neoliberalism” happened through a transnational collaboration between economists, philosophers, and social theorists, united in their rejection of central planning. Defining a common agenda for this “early neoliberalism” offered an opportunity to discard the old laissez-faire doctrine and restore a supervisory role of the state. Ultimately, post-war dissensions regarding the direction of these efforts led Polanyi away from the neoliberal core. Between the publication of his pamphlet on the failures of economic planning in the Soviet Union in 1936 (CF, 61-95) and that of The Logic of Liberty in 1951, Michael Polanyi progressively lost interest in chemistry and started to investigate the political and sociological conditions necessary to scientific freedom and the pursuit of truth. During that time, he became involved with a group of scholars who, equally, perceived the democratic collapse of Europe as a wake-up call for a restatement of its liberal tradition. Whereas the values of individual dignity and social progress that liber- alism carried were needed then more than ever, they agreed that the method to achieve these ideals had become obsolete. Therefore, they focused their efforts on revamping a science of liberalism, which could answer the scientific claims of plannism and totalitar- ian ideologies. Tradition & Discovery: The Journal of the Polanyi Society 45:3 © 2019 by the Polanyi Society 31 For two decades, Michael Polanyi took part in the inception and the consolida- tion of “early neoliberalism” (Schulz-Forberg 2018; Beddeleem 2019), a period that predates the later development of neoliberalism from the 1960s onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Banlieue Rouge: Politics, Local Government and Communal Identity in Arcueil and Cachan, 1919-1958
    The Origins of the Banlieue Rouge: Politics, Local Government and Communal Identity in Arcueil and Cachan, 1919-1958. by Jasen Lewis Burgess A thesis submitted to the University of New South Wales in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History 2005 © Jasen Lewis Burgess, 2005 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the numerous individuals and various institutions that assisted me in the completion of this thesis. The critical appraisal, guidance and support provided by my supervisor Professor Martyn Lyons during the writing of this thesis have been indispensable. Professor Lyons helped initiate my research topic, gave firm, fair and timely advice on the structure and content of this thesis, and has commented on and proofread innumerable drafts. I would also like to thank him for his general support of my candidature, in particular the support he gave to me when I suspended my candidature at the time of the birth of my first son Leon and then when I resumed my candidature some time later. I would like to thank Professor Jacques Girault who suggested Arcueil and Cachan as a thesis topic when I met with him during my first research trip to Paris in 1998, and who also gave me invaluable advice on where to research my thesis in Paris and what journals to consult. I am also grateful to the staff of the Archives Départementales du Val-de-Marne at Creteil, France, for the vital assistance they gave me in my research, including posting material to me in Sydney. Thanks also to the Documentation and Archival Services for the Commune of Arcueil for sending material to me in Sydney, and to the staff at the Musée sociale and the Centre du Recherches d’Histoire des Mouvements Sociaux et Syndicalisme for the assistance they gave me when researching my thesis in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM NATIONALISM to REVOLUTIONARY ISLAM This
    FROM NATIONALISM TO REVOLUTIONARY ISLAM This study of dominant social movements in the Middle and Near East by a group of social scientists and historians is the first attempt to bring nationalism and the contemporary Islamic movements into a unified thematic perspective. The process of national economic and political integration supplies the unifying context for the analyses of the various social movements to which it gives rise. The examination of nationalism in general, and of the rise of the Arab nationalist movement in Greater Syria in the early decades of the century in particular, is followed by a close analysis of the interplay of ethnic identity and Islam in the local politics of the tribal North-Western Frontier Province of Pakistan. The politicisation oflslam in Algeria, Turkey and Egypt is then explored and explained, together with the characteristics of the emergent Islamic movements. The last three essays cover Shi'ite Islam in Iran since the opening decade of the century, focusing on various components and aspects of the Islamic movement which culminated in the revolution of 1979.. The case-studies thus chart the recent upsurge of revolutionary Islam and the concomitant decline of nationalist movements in the contemporary Middle and Near East. The introduction offers an analytical perspective for the integration of this major theme which is forcefully suggested by the juxtaposition of the essays. St Antony's! Macmillan Series General editor: Archie Brown, Fellow of St Antony's College, Oxford Said Amir Arjomand (editor) FROM NATIONALISM TO REVOLUTIONARY ISLAM Anders Aslund PRIVATE ENTERPRISE IN EASTERN EUROPE Archie Brown and Michael Kaser (editors) SOVIET POLICY FOR THE 1980s S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis As a Theory of History
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 41 Number 41 Fall 1999 Article 6 10-1-1999 Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History Leonidas Donskis Dickinson College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Recommended Citation Donskis, Leonidas (1999) "Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 41 : No. 41 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol41/iss41/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Donskis: Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History 56 COMPARATIVE CIVILIZATIONS REVIEW Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History LEONIDAS DONSKIS There seems to be no general reason why specialists in coercion, and specialists in ritual and legitimation, should not be identical. These two supremely impor- tant specializations are indeed sometimes combined. But it is a fact crucial for the history of mankind that they were very often distinct to a greater or lesser degree. The sword may dominate, but the priests help crystallize cohesion among swordsmen. Ernest Gellner In mapping Gellner's (1925-1995) philosophy of history and civilizational theory, it is very important to refer to his intellectu- al and even ideological background. He obviously belongs to a small minority of the twentieth-century social theoreticians who never passed through a Marxist phase. Gellner's consistent, severe and analytically incisive criticism of Marxism and its sociopolitical effects brings him to the company of such critics of the totalitarian regimes and their ideologies as Hannah Arendt, Karl Jaspers, Raymond Aron, Leszek Kolakowski, and Czeslaw Milosz.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Practices of Icarian Communism
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2008-03-25 Spatial Practices of Icarian Communism John Derek McCorquindale Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the French and Francophone Language and Literature Commons, and the Italian Language and Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation McCorquindale, John Derek, "Spatial Practices of Icarian Communism" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 1364. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1364 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A SPATIAL HISTORY OF ICARIAN COMMUNISM by John Derek McCorquindale A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of French & Italian Brigham Young University April 2008 ABSTRACT A SPATIAL HISTORY OF ICARIAN COMMUNISM John Derek McCorquindale Department of French and Italian Master of Arts Prior to the 1848 Revolution in France, a democrat and communist named Étienne Cabet organized one of the largest worker’s movements in Europe. Called “Icarians,” members of this party ascribed to the social philosophy and utopian vision outlined in Cabet’s 1840 novel, Voyage en Icarie , written while in exile. This thesis analyzes the conception of space developed in Cabet’s book, and tracks the group’s actual spatial practice over the next seventeen years. During this period, thousands of Icarians led by Cabet attempted to establish an actual colony in the wilderness of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • La Nouvelle Droite, Ses Pompes Et Ses Œuvres D’Europe Action (1963) À La NRH (2002)
    La Nouvelle Droite, ses pompes et ses œuvres D’Europe Action (1963) à la NRH (2002) par Geoffroy Daubuis Après avoir bénéficié d’une forte publicité dans les années 1978- 1985, la mouvance néopaïenne dite « Nouvelle Droite » peut sembler aujourd’hui passée de mode. En réalité, son influence perdure, tant dans les milieux universitaires que dans les milieux nationalistes. Depuis une dizaine d’années, c’est principalement par les publica- tions d’histoire que la Nouvelle Droite atteint le grand public. Geoffroy Daubuis présente ici un historique de cette mouvance, en trois de ses aspects : I. La revue Europe Action, qui est à l’origine de la Nouvelle Droite. II. Le GRECE, qui en est le noyau dur depuis 1968. III. La NRH (Nouvelle Revue d’Histoire) qui assure depuis 2002 une diffusion « douce » de ses idées. Le Sel de la terre. — I — A l’origine de la Nouvelle Droite : Europe Action A GÉNÉRATION SPONTANÉE n’existe pas plus dans l’ordre intellec- tuel que dans l’ordre physique, et l’on pourrait remonter fort loin pour L établir la généalogie de la Nouvelle Droite. Peut-être faudrait-il revenir à Celse et Porphyre, les polémistes païens de l’Antiquité, dont les attaques anti- chrétiennes préfigurent toutes celles qui viendront par la suite 1. Nous nous contenterons ici de remonter à la fondation d’Europe Action, en 1962-1963, dont les meneurs (Dominique Venner, Alain de Benoist 2, Jean Mabire, 1 — Sur Celse et Porphyre, voir le maître-ouvrage de Pierre DE LABRIOLLE, La Réaction païenne, étude sur la polémique antichrétienne du Ier au VIe siècle, Paris, Cerf, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the French Liberal Moment: Some Thoughts on the Heterogeneous Origins of Lefort and Gauchet's Social Philosophy
    CHAPTER 3 Rethinking the French Liberal Moment: Some Thoughts on the Heterogeneous Origins of Lefort and Gauchet’s Social Philosophy Noah Rosenblum ecent scholarship has taken an interest in the renaissance of French liberal thought in the second half of the twentieth century. This R“French liberal revival” has swept up scholars and commentators alike, and is often thought to include the important French philosophers Claude Lefort and Marcel Gauchet. But, as work in intellectual history has shown,1 the term sits uneasily on at least these two. On close examination, we see that some of their mature thought is only ambiguously committed to liberal goals and rests on complex philosophical premises that are incompatible with some traditional liberal arguments. Tracing aspects of their social thought back to its roots reveals how deeply opposed to liberalism some of their premises were and helps us see how they carried illiberal ideas forward into new contexts. This forces us to take a new perspective on at least this piece of the twentieth century’s French liberal moment, revising accepted stories of its origins and meaning. Recognizing the heterogeneous sources of their argument leads us to appreciate Lefort and Gauchet’s creative work of reconstruction and resist the urge to canalize their powerful social philosophy. Conceptualizing the “French Liberal Revival” In a purely analytic sense, we can understand the idea of a “French liberal revival” in two different ways. The phrase describes, first, a new or renewed interest in traditional liberal themes by thinkers writing in French. We can S. W. Sawyer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Quality of This Reproduction Is
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMZ films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter &ce, while others nuy be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the qualityof the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the origina!, b^inning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overiaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell ft Howdl Infbnnatioa Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Aitor MI 4SI06-I346 USA 313/761-4700 «00/321-0600 THE PRICE OF DREAMS: A HISTORY OF ADVERTISING IN FRANCE. 1927-1968 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Clark Eric H ultquist, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Vous Avez Dit Fascismes ?
    Vous avez dit Fascismes ? C'est en février 1981 que l'Union des écrivains avait rassemblé historiens, juristes, poètes, romanciers et essayistes du monde entier pour parler des fascismes. Pour adapter les textes issus de ce colloque aux contraintes de l'édition et aux dimensions d'un ouvrage modeste, des choix draconiens se sont imposés. Il a fallu couper, éliminer des contributions de grande qualité, pour ne garder que quelques textes exclusivement centrés sur le sujet même des fascismes. La quête de l'éditeur ne fût pas chose facile, malgré la pléiade de noms prestigieux qui honorent cette publication; et puis l'actualité nous a servi. Malgré la gauche au pouvoir, la bête immonde a pris de nouveaux visages. La conjoncture nationale et internationale a remis sur le devant de la scène une nouvelle droite agressive, un fascisme rampant; et l'atmosphère raréfiée de la ville de Dreux a fait écho à l'antisémitisme de certains milieux politiques à l'occasion du bombardement de Beyrouth. Droite et gauche ont puisé à nouveau à la source polluée du racisme, remis en scène avec plus d'impudeur que jamais. Vous avez dit fascismes? On peut polémiquer à l'infini sur le mot. Toujours est-il que les analyses serrées des stratégies culturelles de la Nouvelle Droite ou de la postérité du pétainisme nous semblaient constituer une part de choix dans l'élucidation des avatars de l'idéo- logie fasciste. C'est la première partie de ce livre. Ensuite viennent les témoignages de l'Europe, à l'Ouest comme à l'Est, du tiers monde, comme si entre hier et aujourd'hui presque aucune parcelle de la planète n'avait été épargnée.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialisme Ou Barbarie: a French Revolutionary Group (1949-65)
    Socialisme ou Barbarie: A French Revolutionary Group (1949-65) Marcel van der Lindenl In memory of Cornelius Castoriadis, 11 March 1922 - 26 December 1997 The political and theoretical views developed by the radical group Socialisme ou Barbarie from 1949 onward, have only recently received some attention outside the French speaking world.2 For a long period things were little different in France where the group and its similarly named periodical also received scant attention. This only changed after the students' and workers' rebellion in May- June 1968. The remnants of the journal, which had been unsaleable up to then - it had stopped appearing three years earlier - suddenly became a hot-selling item. Many of the 'heretical' ideas published in it seemed to be confirmed by the unexpected revolt. In 1977 the daily Le Monde wrote on the intellectual efforts of Socialisme ou Barbarie: "This work - aIthough unknown to the public at large -has nevertheless had a powerful influence on those who played a role in May 1968." In the writings of the group one finds "most of the ideas which are being debated nowadays (from workers' control through to the critique of modern technology, of Bolshevism or of mar^)."^ In Socialisme ou Barbarie an attempt was made to consider the bureaucra- tization of social movements. The central questions were: is it an iron law that movements opposing the existing order either fall apart or change into rigid hierarchies? How can militants organize themselves without being absorbed or rigidified into a bureaucratic apparatus? Socialisme ou Barbarie first posed these questions because the group asked itself why things had gone wrong in the traditional labour movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Je Suis Charlie?
    Je Suis Charlie? Why Positive Integration of Muslims in France Reinforces the Republican Ideal By Emmanuel Todd e can now say, with the benefit of hindsight, that in January 2015 France succumbed to an attack of hysteria. The massacre of the editorial board Wof the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, as well as of several police officers and the customers of a Jewish shop, triggered a collective reaction unprec - edented in our country’s history. It would have been impossible to discuss it in the heat of the moment. The media joined hands to denounce terrorism, to celebrate the admirable character of the French people, and to sacralize liberty and the French Republic. Charlie Hebdo and its caricatures of Mohammed were enshrined. The government announced that it was giving a grant to the weekly so that it could get back on its feet. Crowds of people followed the government’s appeal to march in protest throughout the land: they held pencils to symbolize press freedom and applauded the state security police and the marksmen posted on the rooftops. The logo “Je suis Charlie” (“I am Charlie”), written in white letters against a black background, could be seen everywhere: on our screens, in the streets, on restaurant menus. Children came home from school with a letter C written on their hands. Kids aged 7 and 8 were interviewed at the school gates and asked for their thoughts on the horror of the events and the importance of one’s freedom to draw caricatures. The government decreed that anyone who failed to toe the line would be punished.
    [Show full text]