AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1) Idioma original: inglés AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1) CONVENCIÓN SOBRE EL COMERCIO INTERNACIONAL DE ESPECIES AMENAZADAS DE FAUNA Y FLORA SILVESTRES ____________ Vigésimo séptima reunión del Comité de Fauna Veracruz (México), 28 de abril – 3 de mayo de 2014 Interpretación y aplicación de la Convención Cumplimiento y observancia Examen del comercio significativo de especímenes de especies del Apéndice II [Resolución Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13)] ESPECIES SELECCIONADAS TRAS LA COP15 1. Este documento ha sido preparado por la Secretaría. 2. En su 25a reunión (AC25, Ginebra, 2011) y tras la 15a reunión de la Conferencia de las Partes (CoP15, Doha, 2010), el Comité de Fauna seleccionó 24 taxa para el Examen del Comercio Significativo en cumplimiento de los párrafos a) y b) de la Resolución Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13) sobre Examen del comercio significativo de especímenes de especies del Apéndice II (véanse los documentos AC25 Doc. 9.3 y AC25 Doc. 9.6). 3. En su 26a reunión (AC26, Ginebra, 2012), el Comité examinó la información disponible con relación a estos taxa de conformidad con el párrafo f) de la Resolución Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13). En los casos en los que el Comité consideró que los párrafos 2 (a), 3 o 6 (a) del Artículo IV habían sido aplicados adecuadamente, se suprimió la especie del examen con relación al Estado del área de distribución concernido, y dichos Estados fueron notificados en este sentido por la Secretaría (véase el documento AC26 Doc.12.3 y el acta resumida de la reunión AC26). 4. En la reunión AC26, el Comité también decidió que antes de recopilar la información prevista en el párrafo g), se retiraran del examen, en consulta con el Comité de Fauna, aquellos Estados del área de distribución que habían sido mantenidos en el proceso debido a una falta de respuesta pero en los que no se había registrado ningún intercambio comercial en los últimos10 años. En el cuadro que aparece a continuación figuran los taxa y los Estados del área de distribución que se mantienen pues en el examen. Taxa seleccionados después de la CoP15 y mantenidos en el examen después de la reunión AC26 Taxa seleccionados Estado del área de distribución Macaca fascicularis Camboya, Filipinas, India, Indonesia, Mauricio, Palau, República Democrática Popular Lao, Viet Nam Psittacus erithacus Benin, República Centroafricana, Ghana, Nigeria, Togo, Uganda Chamaeleo gracilis Benin, Camerún, Ghana, Guinea, Togo, Uganda Chamaeleo senegalensis Benin, Ghana, Guinea, Mali, Senegal, Sierra Leone Trioceros melleri Mozambique Trioceros quadricornis Camerún, Nigeria Kinyongia fischeri República Unida de Tanzania AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1) – p. 1 Taxa seleccionados Estado del área de distribución Kinyongia tavetana República Unida de Tanzania Ptyas mucosus Camboya, República Democrática Popular Lao Naja sputatrix Indonesia Python reticulatus Camboya, Filipinas, Indonesia, Malasia, República Democrática Popular Lao, Singapur, Viet Nam Podocnemis unifilis Brasil, Ecuador, Perú, Suriname, Venezuela (República bolivariana de) Kinixys homeana Benín, Côte d'Ivoire, Gabón, Guinea Ecuatorial, República Democrática del Congo, Togo Hippocampus algiricus Guinea, Senegal Hippocampus barbouri Filipinas Hippocampus histrix Egipto, Filipinas, Viet Nam Hippocampus trimaculatus Singapur, Tailandia, Viet Nam Antipatharia spp. Bahamas, Cuba, Fiji, Filipinas, Nueva Guinea, Panamá, Papua, República Dominicana, República Popular Democrática de Corea, Taiwán (provincia china), Vanuatu Catalaphyllia jardinei Fiji Euphyllia cristata Fiji, Islas Salomón, Vanuatu, Viet Nam Plerogyra simplex Fiji, Islas Salomón Plerogyra sinuosa Fiji, Islas Marshall, Islas Salomón, Palau, Singapur, Vanuatu Trachyphyllia geoffroyi Islas Salomón, Singapur 5. De conformidad con el párrafo g) de la Resolución, la Secretaría recopiló la información con relación a las especies mencionadas en la tabla anterior. Se contrató al Centro de Monitoreo para la Conservación Mundial del PNUMA (PNUMA-CMCM) para compilar información sobre la biología, la gestión y el comercio de estas especies y proporcionar una categorización preliminar de las mismas, en cumplimiento con los párrafos h) e i). El 13 y el 19 de diciembre de 2013, la Secretaría transmitió los informes elaborados por el PNUMA-CMCM a los Estados del área de distribución correspondientes, los cuales contaron con 60 días para formular observaciones, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el párrafo j). 6. En los informes sobre las especies elaborados por el PNUMA-CMCM se presentan las conclusiones sobre los efectos del comercio internacional de las especies seleccionadas, las bases sobre las que se extrajeron las conclusiones y los problemas relativos a la aplicación del Artículo IV de la Convención. Cada una de las especies ha sido incluida de manera preliminar en una de las tres categorías enunciadas en el párrafo i) de la Resolución Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13), a saber: i) "especies de urgente preocupación", en la que se incluirán las especies respecto de las que la información disponible pone de relieve que no se aplican las disposiciones de los párrafos 2 a), 3 ó 6 a) del Artículo IV; ii) "especies de posible preocupación", en la que se incluirán las especies respecto de las que no está claro si se aplican o no dichas disposiciones; y iii) "especies de menor preocupación", en la que se incluirán las especies respecto de las que de la información disponible parece que se cumplen estas disposiciones. 7. Los informes del PNUMA-CMCM se adjuntan en Anexo 1 del presente documento. Los comentarios de los Estados del área de distribución que habían sido recibidos por la Secretaría en el momento de redactar el presente documento (febrero de 2014) figuran en los Anexos 2 a 10. Dichos comentarios fueron transmitidos por Brasil, Camboya, Indonesia, Malasia, la República Democrática del Congo, Senegal, Tailandia, Uganda, y Viet Nam. AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1) – p. 2 Recomendaciones 8. De conformidad con los párrafos k) y l) de la Resolución Conf. 12.8 (Rev. CoP13), se invita al Comité de Fauna a: a) examinar los informes que figuran en el Anexo al presente documento y las respuestas recibidas de los Estados del área de distribución y, según proceda, revisar las categorizaciones preliminares propuestas por el PNUMA-CMCM; y b) señalar a la atención de la Secretaría los problemas que no estén relacionados con la aplicación de los párrafos 2 (a), 3 ó 6 (a) del Artículo IV. 9. De conformidad con los párrafos m) a o), el Comité de Fauna deberá formular recomendaciones para las especies de urgente preocupación o de posible preocupación fijando plazos para su aplicación. Esas recomendaciones, en las que debería diferenciarse entre las medidas a corto plazo y largo plazo, se remitirán a los Estados del área de distribución concernidos. Las especies de menor preocupación se suprimirán del examen. AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1) – p. 3 AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1) Anexo 1 Examen de Comercio Significativo: Especies seleccionadas por el Comité de Fauna de CITES después de la CoP15 y retenidas en el examen tras el Comité de Fauna 26 Proyecto CITES No. S-412 Preparado para la Secretaría de CITES por Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente Centro Mundial de Monitoreo de la Conservación AC27 Doc. 12.4 (Rev.1) – p. 4 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL Reino Unido Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Página Web: www.unep-wcmc.org CITA ACERCA DEL CENTRO MUNDIAL DE UNEP-WCMC (2013). Examen de Comercio MONITOREO PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN Significativo: Especies seleccionadas por el Comité DEL PNUMA de Fauna después de la CoP15 y retenidas en el Examen tras el Comité de Fauna 26. El Centro Mundial de Monitoreo para la Conservación del PNUMA (UNEP-WCMC), ubicado en Cambridge, Reino Unido, es el centro especialista PREPARADO PARA en información y evaluación de biodiversidad del Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Secretaría CITES, Ginebra, Suiza. Ambiente (PNUMA), es administrado en cooperación con WCMC, una organización de caridad del Reino Unido. La misión del Centro es evaluar y destacar los muchos valores de la biodiversidad y poner DESCARGO DE RESPONSABILIDAD conocimiento autorizado sobre biodiversidad en el centro de la toma de decisiones. A través del El contenido de este informe no necesariamente análisis y síntesis del conocimiento global en refleja los puntos de vista o políticas del PNUMA o biodiversidad el centro proporciona información de las organizaciones contribuyentes. Las autorizada, estratégica y a tiempo para designaciones utilizadas y las presentaciones no Convenciones, países, y organizaciones que la usan implican, en absoluto, la expresión de opinión alguna en el desarrollo e implementación de sus políticas y por parte del PNUMA o de las organizaciones decisiones. contribuyentes respecto a la situación jurídica de algún país, territorio, ciudad, compañía o área o su El UNEP-WCMC brinda procedimientos y servicios autoridad, ni tampoco respecto a la delimitación de objetivos y científicamente rigurosos. Estos incluyen sus fronteras o límites. evaluaciones de ecosistemas, apoyo para la implementación de acuerdos ambientales, información sobre la biodiversidad global y regional, © Copyright: 2013, Secretaría CITES investigación en amenazas e impactos, y el desarrollo de escenarios futuros. AC27 Doc. 12.4 – p. 5 Contenido Introducción .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Macaca fascicularis ................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Extreme Miniaturization of a New Amniote Vertebrate and Insights Into the Evolution of Genital Size in Chameleons
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Extreme miniaturization of a new amniote vertebrate and insights into the evolution of genital size in chameleons Frank Glaw1*, Jörn Köhler2, Oliver Hawlitschek3, Fanomezana M. Ratsoavina4, Andolalao Rakotoarison4, Mark D. Scherz5 & Miguel Vences6 Evolutionary reduction of adult body size (miniaturization) has profound consequences for organismal biology and is an important subject of evolutionary research. Based on two individuals we describe a new, extremely miniaturized chameleon, which may be the world’s smallest reptile species. The male holotype of Brookesia nana sp. nov. has a snout–vent length of 13.5 mm (total length 21.6 mm) and has large, apparently fully developed hemipenes, making it apparently the smallest mature male amniote ever recorded. The female paratype measures 19.2 mm snout–vent length (total length 28.9 mm) and a micro-CT scan revealed developing eggs in the body cavity, likewise indicating sexual maturity. The new chameleon is only known from a degraded montane rainforest in northern Madagascar and might be threatened by extinction. Molecular phylogenetic analyses place it as sister to B. karchei, the largest species in the clade of miniaturized Brookesia species, for which we resurrect Evoluticauda Angel, 1942 as subgenus name. The genetic divergence of B. nana sp. nov. is rather strong (9.9‒14.9% to all other Evoluticauda species in the 16S rRNA gene). A comparative study of genital length in Malagasy chameleons revealed a tendency for the smallest chameleons to have the relatively largest hemipenes, which might be a consequence of a reversed sexual size dimorphism with males substantially smaller than females in the smallest species.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Species Selected at SRG 45 Following Working Group Recommendations on Reptiles and One Scorpion from Benin, Ghana and Togo
    Review of species selected at SRG 45 following working group recommendations on reptiles and one scorpion from Benin, Ghana and Togo (Version edited for public release) A report to the European Commission Directorate General E - Environment ENV.E.2. – Environmental Agreements and Trade by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre November, 2008 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL CITATION United Kingdom UNEP-WCMC (2008). Review of species selected at SRG 45 following working group recommendations on reptiles Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 and one scorpion from Benin, Ghana and Togo. A Report Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 to the European Commission. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org PREPARED FOR ABOUT UNEP-WORLD CONSERVATION The European Commission, Brussels, Belgium MONITORING CENTRE The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre DISCLAIMER (UNEP-WCMC), based in Cambridge, UK, is the The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect specialist biodiversity information and assessment the views or policies of UNEP or contributory centre of the United Nations Environment organisations. The designations employed and the Programme (UNEP), run cooperatively with WCMC presentations do not imply the expressions of any 2000, a UK charity. The Centre's mission is to opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP, the evaluate and highlight the many values of European Commission or contributory organisations biodiversity and put authoritative biodiversity concerning the legal status of any country, territory, knowledge at the centre of decision-making. city or area or its authority, or concerning the Through the analysis and synthesis of global delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • OCS Study BOEM 2017-024
    OCS Study BOEM 2017-024 Deepwater Reconnaissance of Potentially Sensitive Biological Features Surrounding Shelf-Edge Topographical Banks in the Northern Gulf of Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2017-024 Deepwater Reconnaissance of Potentially Sensitive Biological Features Surrounding Shelf-Edge Topographical Banks in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Author Paul Sammarco Prepared under BOEM Contract M11AC00005 by Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium 8124 Highway 56 Baton Rouge, LA 70344-2110 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior New Orleans, LA Bureau of Ocean Energy Management February 2017 Gulf of Mexico OCS Region DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (LUMCON). This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not necessarily signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this Gulf of Mexico OCS Region report, go to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program Information System website and search on OCS Study BOEM 2017-024. This report can be viewed at select Federal Depository Libraries. It can also be obtained from the National Technical Information Service; the contact information is below. U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5301 Shawnee Rd. Springfield, Virginia 22312 Phone: (703) 605-6000, 1(800)553-6847 Fax: (703) 605-6900 Website: http://www.ntis.gov/ CITATION Sammarco, Paul W.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Species/Country Combinations Selected for Review by the Animals Committee Following Cop16 CITES Project No
    AC29 Doc. 13.2 Annex 1 UNEP-WCMC technical report Report on species/country combinations selected for review by the Animals Committee following CoP16 CITES Project No. A-498 AC29 Doc. 13.2 Annex 1 Report on species/country combinations selected for review by the Animals Committee following CoP16 Prepared for CITES Secretariat Published May 2017 Citation UNEP-WCMC. 2017. Report on species/country combinations selected for review by the Animals Committee following CoP16. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the many experts who provided valuable data and opinions in the compilation of this report. Copyright CITES Secretariat, 2017 The UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment centre of UN Environment, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission, provided acknowledgement to the source is made. Reuse of any figures is subject to permission from the original rights holders. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose without permission in writing from UN Environment. Applications for permission, with a statement of purpose and extent of reproduction, should be sent to the Director, UNEP-WCMC, 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UN Environment, contributory organisations or editors. The designations employed and the presentations of material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UN Environment or contributory organisations, editors or publishers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city area or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries or the designation of its name, frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Animal Species Used by Indigenous Traditional Medicine Practitioners in Ogbomoso, Oyo State
    Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research 3(4): 1-8, 2017; Article no.JOCAMR.36018 ISSN: 2456-6276 Conservation Status of Animal Species Used by Indigenous Traditional Medicine Practitioners in Ogbomoso, Oyo State J. Ebele Ajagun 1* and E. Caesar Anyaku 2 1Medicinal Plant Unit, Bioresources Development Centre, National Biotechnology Development Agency, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. 2Veterinary Unit, Bioresources Development Centre, National Biotechnology Development Agency Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between both authors. Author JEA designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, wrote the protocol, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Author ECA took part in the survey, managed the literature searches and contributed to the first draft of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/JOCAMR/2017/36018 Editor(s): (1) Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus Av. San Rafael Atlixco, Mexico. Reviewers: (1) M. Fawzi Mahomoodally, University of Mauritius, Mauritius. (2) Nwachukwu Francis Chukwuedozie, Nigeria Police Academy, Nigeria. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/21007 Received 8th August 2017 Accepted 7th September 2017 Original Research Article Published 15 th September 2017 ABSTRACT Aim: To document the indigenous knowledge of fauna species used in traditional medicine practices and to establish their conservational status. Study Design: A questionnaire guided survey of the traditional uses of fauna species by the indigenous people of Ogbomoso, Oyo State. Place and Duration of Study: Bioresources Development Centre, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria between March and December, 2016. Methodology: A total of 43 participants were interviewed during the survey and constituted 4 hunters, 19 traditional medicine practitioner (TMP) and 20 trado-herbal traders (THT) as the study population.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of a New Flat Gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320043814 Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique Article in Zootaxa · September 2017 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 CITATIONS READS 2 531 8 authors, including: William R Branch Jennifer Anna Guyton Nelson Mandela University Princeton University 250 PUBLICATIONS 4,231 CITATIONS 7 PUBLICATIONS 164 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Andreas Schmitz Michael Barej Natural History Museum of Geneva Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiver… 151 PUBLICATIONS 2,701 CITATIONS 38 PUBLICATIONS 274 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Monitoring and Managing Biodiversity Loss in South-East Africa's Montane Ecosystems View project Ad hoc herpetofauna observations View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jennifer Anna Guyton on 27 September 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Zootaxa 4324 (1): 142–160 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4324.1.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B4FF9A5F-94A7-4E75-9EC8-B3C382A9128C Description of a new flat gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Afroedura) from Mount Gorongosa, Mozambique WILLIAM R. BRANCH1,2,13, JENNIFER A. GUYTON3, ANDREAS SCHMITZ4, MICHAEL F. BAREJ5, PIOTR NASKRECKI6,7, HARITH FAROOQ8,9,10,11, LUKE VERBURGT12 & MARK-OLIVER RÖDEL5 1Port Elizabeth Museum, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa 2Research Associate, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 CITES Listed Species
    Dutch Caribbean Species of High Conservation Value 4 CITES listed species 4.1 Notes on CITES Species CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) is an international agreement between governments. Its aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. In the CITES legislation organisms are classified in 3 categories depending on how endangered they are thought to be, or the degree of protection they are thought to need (CITES-Website 2012); ! Appendix I includes species threatened with extinction. Trade in specimens of these species is permitted only in exceptional circumstances. Import and export or re-export permits are required, issued by the Management Authority of the State of Import, Export or Re-Export. ! Appendix II includes species where trade is allowed but restricted. An export or re-export certificate is required, but no import permit is needed unless required by national law. ! Appendix III are species in which trade is allowed but monitored. An export permit must be issued by the Management Authority of the State that included the species in Appendix III. 4.2 Summary data CITES I CITES II CITES I CITES II CITES Dutch Caribbean 15 189 Saba 16 153 Marine 12 1120 Marine 5 115 Terrestrial 3 68 Terrestrial 1 36 Aruba 7 124 St Eustatius 160 159 Marine 4 102 Marine 5 115 Terrestrial 3 21 Terrestrial 1 43 Bonaire 17 153 St Maarten 16 152 Marine 5 115 Marine 5 115 Terrestrial 2 31 Terrestrial 1 33 Curaçao 17 158 Marine 6 115 Terrestrial 1 36 CITES listed species 31 November 2012 Dutch Caribbean Species of High Conservation Value 4.3 CITES I 4.3.1 Marine CITES Appendix I species Common Group Name English Name Scientific name Notes Aruba Bonaire Curaçao Saba Eustatius St.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Antipatharia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa)
    ZM 75 343-370 | 17 (opresko) 12-01-2007 07:55 Page 343 Revision of the Antipatharia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Part I. Establishment of a new family, Myriopathidae D.M. Opresko Opresko, D.M. Revision of the Antipatharia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Part I. Establishment of a new fami- ly, Myriopathidae. Zool. Med. Leiden 75 (17), 24.xii.2001: 343-370, figs. 1-18.— ISSN 0024-0672. Dennis M. Opresko, Life Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1060 Commerce Park, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]). Key words: Cnidaria; Anthozoa: Antipatharia; Myriopathidae fam. nov.; Myriopathes gen. nov.; Cupressopathes gen. nov.; Plumapathes gen. nov.; Antipathella Brook; Tanacetipathes Opresko. A new family of antipatharian corals, Myriopathidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Antipatharia), is estab- lished for Antipathes myriophylla Pallas and related species. The family is characterized by polyps 0.5 to 1.0 mm in transverse diameter; short tentacles with a rounded tip; acute, conical to blade-like spines up to 0.3 mm tall on the smallest branchlets or pinnules; and cylindrical, simple, forked or antler-like spines on the larger branches and stem. Genera are differentiated on the basis of morphological fea- tures of the corallum. Myriopathes gen. nov., type species Antipathes myriophylla Pallas, has two rows of primary pinnules, and uniserially arranged secondary pinnules. Tanacetipathes Opresko, type species T. tanacetum (Pourtalès), has bottle-brush pinnulation with four to six rows of primary pinnules and one or more orders of uniserial (sometimes biserial) subpinnules. Cupressopathes gen. nov., type species Gorgonia abies Linnaeus, has bottle-brush pinnulation with four very irregular, or quasi-spiral rows of primary pinnules and uniserial, bilateral, or irregularly arranged higher order pinnules.
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Record of Scolecomorphus Kirkii Boulenger, 1883 (Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae) for Mozambique
    Herpetology Notes, volume 8: 59-62 (2015) (published online on 10 March 2015) A second record of Scolecomorphus kirkii Boulenger, 1883 (Gymnophiona: Scolecomorphidae) for Mozambique Harith Omar Morgadinho Farooq1 and Werner Conradie2,* The herpetofauna of northern Mozambique (Nampula, Branch et al., 2014), crustaceans (Daniels and Bayliss, Niassa, and Cabo Degabo Provinces) remains one of the 2012) and bats (Taylor et al., 2012). While Portik et al. most poorly-known in Africa. This is a consequence of (2013a) summarised the herpetofauna of the inselbergs the physical inaccessibility of the region as well as the of northern Mozambique, they overlooked the valuable protracted civil war, which affected the study of many amphibian collections in the technical report by Branch areas. Mozambique is expected to have a large diversity (2004) from Niassa Game Reserve and the herpetofaunal of herpetofauna due to the variety of different habitat collections from Mount Mabu (Timberlake et al., 2012), types available and the large size (area) of the country. which led to underestimation and incorrect accounts of The lack of scientific studies of northern Mozambique the herpetofaunal diversity of the montane inselbergs of has led to widely disparate and inaccurate summaries northern Mozambique. of the herpetofaunal diversity of the country. While In November 2011 and May 2014 a team of scientists, there are no formal publications that explicitly deal mountain climbers, and conservationists had the with this topic, reputable internet sources indicate that opportunity to survey Mount Namuli, which resulted 221 reptile (Uetz, 2015) and 69 amphibian species in some additions to the herpetofauna of that area. (AmphibiaWeb, 2015) are expected to occur in the whole of Mozambique.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographic Identification Guide to Some Common Marine Invertebrates of Bocas Del Toro, Panama
    Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 41, No. 3, 638-707, 2005 Copyright 2005 College of Arts and Sciences University of Puerto Rico, Mayagu¨ez Photographic Identification Guide to Some Common Marine Invertebrates of Bocas Del Toro, Panama R. COLLIN1,M.C.DÍAZ2,3,J.NORENBURG3,R.M.ROCHA4,J.A.SÁNCHEZ5,A.SCHULZE6, M. SCHWARTZ3, AND A. VALDÉS7 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama. 2Museo Marino de Margarita, Boulevard El Paseo, Boca del Rio, Peninsula de Macanao, Nueva Esparta, Venezuela. 3Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Invertebrate Zoology, Washington, DC 20560-0163, USA. 4Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Zoologia, CP 19020, 81.531-980, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. 5Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1E No 18A – 10, Bogotá, Colombia. 6Smithsonian Marine Station, 701 Seaway Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34949, USA. 7Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA. This identification guide is the result of intensive sampling of shallow-water habitats in Bocas del Toro during 2003 and 2004. The guide is designed to aid in identification of a selection of common macroscopic marine invertebrates in the field and includes 95 species of sponges, 43 corals, 35 gorgonians, 16 nem- erteans, 12 sipunculeans, 19 opisthobranchs, 23 echinoderms, and 32 tunicates. Species are included here on the basis on local abundance and the availability of adequate photographs. Taxonomic coverage of some groups such as tunicates and sponges is greater than 70% of species reported from the area, while coverage for some other groups is significantly less and many microscopic phyla are not included.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Revised Classification of Squamata, Including 4161 Species of Lizards and Snakes
    BMC Evolutionary Biology This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:93 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-93 Robert Alexander Pyron ([email protected]) Frank T Burbrink ([email protected]) John J Wiens ([email protected]) ISSN 1471-2148 Article type Research article Submission date 30 January 2013 Acceptance date 19 March 2013 Publication date 29 April 2013 Article URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/93 Like all articles in BMC journals, this peer-reviewed article can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below). Articles in BMC journals are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central. For information about publishing your research in BMC journals or any BioMed Central journal, go to http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/authors/ © 2013 Pyron et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes Robert Alexander Pyron 1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Frank T Burbrink 2,3 Email: [email protected] John J Wiens 4 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G St.
    [Show full text]