DOCSLIB.ORG

Health System Research in Perak 2006 – 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

㻾㼑㼟㼑㼍㼞㼏㼔㻌 㼀㼛㻌㼙㼍㼗㼑㻌㼍 Health System Research Difference Perak 2006 - 2009 Research To make a Health System Research Difference Perak 2006 - 2009 July 2013 Health System Research (HSR) in Perak 2006-2009 Using Research to Make a Difference © July 2013, Clinical Research Centre Perak, Level 4, Ambulatory Care Centre, Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital, Jalan Hospital, 30990 Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia. Editorial Committee Amar-Singh HSS Ooi Qing Xi Lionel Chia Dick Hua Lim Wei Yin Lina Hashim Arvinder Singh Harbaksh Singh Advisors Datin Dr Ranjit Kaur Praim Singh Deputy Director of Perak State Health Department (Public Health) Sondi Sararaks Head Health Outcomes Research Division, Institute for Health Systems Research (IHSR) Dr Asmah Zainal Abidin Head of Assistant Director of Public Health Division (Non-Communicable Disease Centre, NCDC) Perak State Health Department Disclaimer The views, interpretations, implications, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this book are those of the authors of individual reports and do not necessarily represent the opinions, the views or policy of the Ministry of Health Malaysia. Acknowledgement The authors wish to thank the Director-General of Health Malaysia for giving permission to publish these reports. Contents Home Safety Practices for Prevention of Poisoning in 1 Young Children Effective Implementation of a Structured 41 Psychoeducation Programme Among Caregivers of Schizophrenia Patients in the Community Improving Asthma Care in Ministry of Health Primary 89 Care Clinics The Involvement of Lay Educators in Diabetic Control 123 of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Improving Knowledge of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 163 Patients on Oral Hypoglycaemic Agents Health Seeking Behaviour Towards Communicable 205 Diseases Among Foreign Workers in Industrial & Agriculture Sectors of Selected Districts in Perak, Malaysia Improving Blood Pressure Controls in Primary Care 249 Settings An Intervention Programme Among Overweight 281 Primary School Children Effectiveness of the Diabetic Foot Care Programme in 321 a Primary Care Setting Home Safety Practices for Prevention of Poisoning in Young Children Health Systems Research 2008/2009 Authors Shoba Pathmanathan Paediatric Department, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun Ipoh, Perak Lina Hashim Clinical Research Centre Perak Affendi Yusuf Manjung District Health Office Vishanthri Kulasingam Greentown Health Clinic Hooi-Meng Puah Kinta District Health Office Amar-Singh HSS Clinical Research Centre Perak, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun Ipoh, Perak Sondi Sararaks Institute for Health Systems Research Ranjit Kaur Praim Singh Perak State Health Department Asmah Zainal Abidin Perak State Health Department Clinical Research Centre (CRC) Perak recommends using the following statement to cite this report in our publication entitled “Health System Research (HSR) in Perak 2006-2009: Using Research to Make a Difference”: Shoba Pathmanathan, Lina Hashim, Affendi Yusuf, Vishanthri Kulasingam, Hooi-Meng Puah, Amar-Singh HSS, Sondi Sararaks, Ranjit Kaur Praim Singh, Asmah Zainal Abidin. ”Home Safety Practices for Prevention of Poisoning in Young Children” in Health System Research (HSR) in Perak 2006-2009: Using Research to Make a Difference. Clinical Research Centre (CRC) Perak, 2013, pp 1. (ISBN: 9789671063422) ISBN 1 9789671063422 Contents of Report page Abstract 3 1. 0 Introduction 5 1.1 Problem statement 1.2 Problem analysis 2.0 Objective 9 2.1 General objective 2.2 Specific objectives 3.0 Methodology 9 3.1 Overview of research design 3.2 Intervention package 3.3 Study type 3.4 Ethical considerations 3.5 Variables 3.6 Sampling 3.7 Techniques for data collection & pre-testing 3.8 Plan for Data Analysis and Interpretation (Include Dummy Tables) 4.0 Results 17 4.1 Results of Evaluation of Safety Device 4.2 Socio-demographic data 5.0 Discussion 24 5.1 Statement of principal findings 5.2 Strengths and weaknesses of the study 5.3 Strengths and weaknesses in relation to other studies 5.4 Meaning of the Study (Possible Mechanism and Implication for Clinicians/Policymakers) 5.5 Unanswered questions and future research 6.0 Conclusion & Recommendations 27 References 28 Appendices 31 2 Home Safety Practices for Prevention of Poisoning in Young Children ABSTRACT Home Safety Practices for Prevention of Poisoning in Young Children Shoba Pathmanathan¹, Lina Hashim², Affendi Yusuf³, Vishanthri Kulasingam4, Hooi-Meng Puah5, Amar-Singh HSS¹,², Sondi Sararaks6, Ranjit Kaur Praim Singh7, Asmah Zainal Abidin7 1 Paediatric Department, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun Ipoh 2 Clinical Research Centre Perak 3 Manjung District Health Office 4 Greentown Health Clinic 5 Kinta District Health Office 6 Institute for Health Systems Research 7 Perak State Health Department Introduction and Objectives Poisoning in young children is defined as unintentional ingestion of medication(s) and common household products or chemicals. Poisoning in young children is a preventable cause of mortality and morbidity. Poisoning accounts for 2% of the accidental deaths in developed countries and for 5% in developing countries. Most poisoning accidents occur in children aged between 1 to 4 years old. The objective of the study was to evaluate and improve home poison safety practices to prevent poisoning in homes with children aged 1-4 years in the Kinta and the Manjung Districts. Methodology The study was a non-controlled community trial conducted at urban and semi-urban areas in Perak state to assess home safety practices and effectiveness of an intervention programme in home setting. Initial validation of a safety device involved 100 children and 100 adults (parents/caregivers accompanying the child) who attended Ministry of Health (MOH) health clinics and were recruited to test two home safety devices. In both urban and semi-urban areas, 300 households with children aged 1-4 years were randomly selected. They were audited at baseline. Two post-intervention audits were conducted at 3 and 6 months post-baseline audit using the same tools as in the first audit. The households were divided into two intervention arms. Caregivers in the first arm received Intervention Package 1 which consists of an immediate post-audit feedback, an educational pamphlet and a home safety device while caregivers in the second arm received Intervention Package 2 which consists of an immediate post-audit feedback and an educational pamphlet. Results At baseline, 60-71% of urban and semi-urban households in Perak had unsafe home safety practices to prevent poisoning in young children. Only 30 (20.4%) households in the Kinta District compared to 79 (52.7%) households in the Manjung District had good Home Safety Practices for Prevention of Poisoning in Young Children 3 knowledge. Good knowledge does not ensure a safe household. At the end of the study there was a statistically significant increase in the percentage of safe households in both districts with Kinta District doing better. Kinta District had an incarese from 48.6% (CI 40.4-56.8) to 93.9% (CI 89.7-98.0) while in the Manjung District, the increase was from 21.3% (CI 14.7-28.0) to 67.7% (CI 59.7-75.6). Conclusion The intervention package notably the Home Safety Practices Audit checklist, which was developed by the researchers for the study, significantly improved home poisoning safety practices. 75.7-85.3% of urban and semi-urban households in Perak had a safe home to prevent poisoning in children at the end of the study. Addition of the safety device to the home safety practices audit further improves home poisoning safety practices. Knowledge and perception does not ensure a safe household in prevention of poisoning in young children. Keywords poisoning in children, home poisoning safety practices, safe households, home safety practices audit checklist, safety device 4 Home Safety Practices for Prevention of Poisoning in Young Children 1.0 INTRODUCTION Poisoning in young children is defined as unintentional ingestion of medication and common household products (J. Nixon et al. 2004). Poisoning in young children is a preventable cause of mortality and morbidity (Laffoy M., 1997). Poisonings account for 2% of the accidental deaths in developed countries and for 5% in developing countries (Nadarajah P., 2004). Most poisoning accidents occur in children aged between 1 to 4 years (48.5% in the study by Sibel E. and Sukran S. (2006) and 60.3% according to FDA’s Poisoning Surveillance and Epidemiology Branch 1981. Around 80-85% poisoning accidents occur in the home (B. Jacobson et al. 1989). Children under the age of 5 are in a stage of development where they constantly explore their home environment. This is a normal characteristic and should not be restricted. Unfortunately they usually put whatever they see or reach in their mouth (A. W. Craft, 1990). Most of the poisoning accidents (49.5%) stemmed from storing of drugs within the reach of children. Out of these accidents, 49.5% were due to drugs, 17.5% due to cleaning agents and 16.5% due to insecticides/pesticides (Sibel E. et al. 2006). In a study on home safety in the United States, although most families reported locked storage of medications, 77% had unlocked storage of medication documented during home observation (Kimberly E. et al. 2007). Medications involved in suspected poisoning were most frequently packed in containers without Child Resistant Containers (CRC) (63%) or transparent blisters (20%). However safe packaging cannot compensate for unsafe storage. Bathroom and kitchen cabinets and drawers are the safest place to store medication (H. M. Wiseman et al. 1987). The concept of CRC is widely supported by parents as an important mechanism for protecting children from toxic products. However the support for CRCs was often based on the notion that they were childproof rather than child resistant. As a result some parents were more likely to store products unsafely if they were in CRCs (L. Gibbs et al. 2005). CRC is defined by the Poison prevention Packaging Act to be packaging that is “difficult for children under age of 5 years to open” but “not difficult for normal adults to use properly”.
Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Data

    Supplemental Data

    Appendix: Omega 3 Fatty Acids (Fish Oils) and Aspirin in Vascular Access Outcomes in Renal Disease (FAVOURED) Study Collaborative Group The FAVOURED Study Collaborative Group comprises the Trial Steering Committee (Chen Au Peh [CNARTS, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia], Elaine Beller [Faculty of Health Services and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia], Alan Cass [School Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia], Sharan Dogra [Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia], David Gracey [Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia], Elvie Haluszkiewicz [Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia], Carmel Hawley [Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia], Lai-Seong Hooi [Hemodialysis Unit, Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Johor Bahru, Malaysia], Colin Hutchison [Renal Services, Hawkes Bay Hospital, Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand], Ashley Irish [Department of Nephrology Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia], Peter Kerr [Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia], Amanda Mather [Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia], Stephen McDonald [CNARTS, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia], Chris McIntyre [London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada], Trevor Mori [Medical School, RPH Unit, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia], Elaine Pascoe [Australasian Kidney Trials Network,
  • Patient's Knowledge and Use of Sublingual Glyceryl Trinitrate Therapy in Taiping Hospital, Malaysia

    Patient's Knowledge and Use of Sublingual Glyceryl Trinitrate Therapy in Taiping Hospital, Malaysia

    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences Vol:8, No:10, 2014 Patient’s Knowledge and Use of Sublingual Glyceryl Trinitrate Therapy in Taiping Hospital, Malaysia Wan Azuati Wan Omar, Selva Rani John Jasudass, Siti Rohaiza Md Saad sensitive. They should therefore be stored in a tightly capped Abstract—Background: The objectives of this study were to original bottle (amber glass bottle) in a cool dry place [3]. assess patient’s knowledge of appropriate sublingual glyceryl Kimble &Kunik (2000) suggested that patient’s access to trinitrate (GTN) use as well as to investigate how patients commonly the medication& confidence in ability to use it, DO NOT store and carry their sublingual GTN tablets. Methodology: This was assure appropriate use [4]. The study found that 65% of the a cross-sectional survey, using a validated researcher-administered questionnaire. The study involved cardiac patients receiving subjects lacked knowledge on the proper use of SL GTN, plus sublingual GTN attending the outpatient and inpatient departments of a significant 32% used the drug for other symptoms. In Taiping Hospital, a non-academic public care hospital. The minimum another study done by Gallagher et al. (2010) involved a total calculated sample size was 92, but 100 patients were conveniently of 89 cardiac patients in Australia, only 43% claimed that they sampled. Respondents were interviewed on 3 areas, including have received related instruction before [5]. In the same study, demographic data, knowledge and use of sublingual GTN. Eight they found that although majority knew the importance of the items were used to calculate each subject’s knowledge score and six items were used to calculate use score.
  • Spatial Management Plan

    Spatial Management Plan

    6 -1 CHAPTER 6 SPATIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN The Spatial Management Plan is a basic framework that drives the translation of national strategic directions to the state level. The Spatial Management Plan consist of aspects related to spatial Three (3) Types of State Spatial availability (land use and transportation), growth areas (Conurbation, Management Plan Promoted Development Zone, Catalyst Centre and Agropolitan Centre), settlement hierarchies, resource management (forest, water, food, Spatial Growth Framework energy source and other natural resources) and disaster risk areas 1 Plan (tsunami, flood, landslide, coastal erosion and rise in sea level). Resource Management Plan A Spatial Management Plan at the state level is prepared to translate 2 national strategic directions to the state level (all states in Peninsular Natural Disaster Risk Area Malaysia, Sabah and Labuan Federal Territory) especially for strategic 3 Management Plan directions that have direct implications on a spatial aspect such as: . 1. Growth and development of cities as well as rural areas that is balanced and integrated (PD1 and PD 2); 2. Connectivity and access that is enhanced and sustainable (PD3); 3. Sustainable management of natural resources, food resources and State Spatial Management Plan heritage resources (KD1); involve the following states: 4. Management of risk areas (KD2); 5. Low carbon cities and sustainable infrastructure (KD3); and 1. Perlis pp. 6 - 8 6. Inclusive community development (KI1, KI2 and KI3). 2. Kedah pp. 6 - 14 3. Pulau Pinang pp. 6 - 20 This management plan shall become the basis for planning growth areas, conservation of resource areas as well as ensuring planning 4. Perak pp. 6 - 26 takes into account risks of natural disaster.
  • Proses Penyediaan Rancangan Tempatan

    Proses Penyediaan Rancangan Tempatan

    PROSES PENYEDIAAN RANCANGAN TEMPATAN LAPORAN RANGKA PROJEK (LRP) Menggantikan PUBLISITI AWAL Rancangan Tempatan Daerah TERMA RUJUKAN Kerian 2020 Yang Menyelaraskan MOBILISASI susun atur tanah- Akan Tamat Pada PENYEDIAAN PETA ASAS tanah yang terletak Tahun 2020 Menyelaraskan bersempadan perancangan di Daerah dengan lot-lot yang Kerian selaras dengan telah dibangunkan 01 Draf Rancangan Struktur Negeri Perak 2040 LAPORAN PENDEKATAN KAJIAN Bulan) LAPORAN ANALISIS DAN STRATEGI 08 02 PEMBANGUNAN (LASP) 8 Memperincikan PENYEDIAAN DRAF RANCANGAN TEMPATAN klasifikasi kegunaan Mengenal pasti DRAF RT tanah (Kelas Kegunaan kawasan yang sesuai Tanah) dan densiti untuk dimajukan serta pembangunan serta corak pembangunan mengukuhkan syarat- yang akan syarat pembangunan 07 03 dilaksanakan PUBLISITI & PENYERTAAN AWAM JAWATANKUASA SIASATAN TEMPATAN DAN 06 PUBLISITI & PENDENGARAN AWAM 04 ( Tempoh Pelaksanaan Merangka semula Membantu Pihak PENYERTAAN AWAM sistem perparitan bagi Berkuasa mengatasi isu banjir di Perancang kawasan potensi banjir 05 Tempatan (PBPT) di bawah pentadbiran dalam menyelaras PINDAAN DAN KELULUSAN DRAF RT OLEH pembangunan dan Majlis Daerah Kerian Meminda zon guna JAWATANKUASA PERANCANG NEGERI (JPN) tanah berdasarkan kawalan kelulusan Tukar Syarat perancangan Tanah, Kebenaran PERSETUJUAN PIHAK BERKUASA NEGERI (PBN) Merancang dan pembangunan sedia PEWARTAAN RANCANGAN TEMPATAN DAN ada dengan keperluan PEWARTAAN RT PELAKSANAAN akan datang PROFIL KAWASAN DRAF RT DAERAH KERIAN KELUASAN KAWASAN KAJIAN Daerah Kerian berkeluasan 91,299.93 hektar
  • Malaysian Statistics on Medicines 2009 & 2010

    Malaysian Statistics on Medicines 2009 & 2010

    MALAYSIAN STATISTICS ON MEDICINES 2009 & 2010 Edited by: Siti Fauziah A., Kamarudin A., Nik Nor Aklima N.O. With contributions from: Faridah Aryani MY., Fatimah AR., Sivasampu S., Rosliza L., Rosaida M.S., Kiew K.K., Tee H.P., Ooi B.P., Ooi E.T., Ghan S.L., Sugendiren S., Ang S.Y., Muhammad Radzi A.H. , Masni M., Muhammad Yazid J., Nurkhodrulnada M.L., Letchumanan G.R.R., Fuziah M.Z., Yong S.L., Mohamed Noor R., Daphne G., Chang K.M., Tan S.M., Sinari S., Lim Y.S., Tan H.J., Goh A.S., Wong S.P., Fong AYY., Zoriah A, Omar I., Amin AN., Lim CTY, Feisul Idzwan M., Azahari R., Khoo E.M., Bavanandan S., Sani Y., Wan Azman W.A., Yusoff M.R., Kasim S., Kong S.H., Haarathi C., Nirmala J., Sim K.H., Azura M.A., Suganthi T., Chan L.C., Choon S.E., Chang S.Y., Roshidah B., Ravindran J., Nik Mohd Nasri N.I, Wan Hamilton W.H., Zaridah S., Maisarah A.H., Rohan Malek J., Selvalingam S., Lei C.M., Hazimah H., Zanariah H., Hong Y.H.J., Chan Y.Y., Lin S.N., Sim L.H., Leong K.N., Norhayati N.H.S, Sameerah S.A.R, Rahela A.K., Yuzlina M.Y., Hafizah ZA ., Myat SK., Wan Nazuha W.R, Lim YS,Wong H.S., Rosnawati Y., Ong S.G., Mohd. Shahrir M.S., Hussein H., Mary S.C., Marzida M., Choo Y. M., Nadia A.R., Sapiah S., Mohd. Sufian A., Tan R.Y.L., Norsima Nazifah S., Nurul Faezah M.Y., Raymond A.A., Md.
  • Daerah Kerian 2035

    Daerah Kerian 2035

    Ringkasan Eksekutif DRAF RANCANGAN TEMPATAN DAERAH KERIAN 2035 KANDUNGAN Ringkasan Eksekutif DRAF RANCANGAN TEMPATAN DAERAH KERIAN 2035 Keperluan Dan Proses Penyediaan Rancangan Tempatan Profil Daerah Kerian Penemuan Utama Guna Tanah Semasa Daerah Kerian 2018 Kerangka dan Teras Pembangunan Daerah Kerian Cadangan Konsep Pembangunan Daerah Kerian Guna Tanah Cadangan Daerah Kerian 2035 Teras 1: Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dinamik dan Berdaya saing Teras 2: Pembangunan Fizikal Mampan dan Reka Bentuk Persekitaran Menarik Teras 3: Kelestarian Alam Sekitar dan Infrastruktur Efisien Teras 4: Pembangunan Komuniti Sejahtera Teras 5: Urus Tadbir Cekap dan Mesra Rakyat KEPERLUAN PENYEDIAAN RANCANGAN TEMPATAN Menggantikan Rancangan Tempatan Daerah Kerian 2020 Yang Akan Tamat Pada Menyelaraskan Tahun 2020 susun atur tanah- tanah yang terletak Menyelaraskan bersempadan perancangan di Daerah dengan lot-lot yang Kerian selaras dengan Draf telah dibangunkan 01 Rancangan Struktur Negeri Perak 2040 08 02 Memperincikan klasifikasi kegunaan tanah (Kelas Mengenal pasti kawasan Kegunaan Tanah) 07 yang sesuai untuk dan densiti dimajukan serta corak pembangunan serta pembangunan yang akan mengukuhkan dilaksanakan syarat-syarat 03 pembangunan 04 06 Merangka semula Membantu Pihak sistem perparitan bagi Berkuasa Perancang mengatasi isu banjir di Tempatan (PBPT) dalam kawasan potensi banjir 05 menyelaras di bawah pentadbiran pembangunan dan Majlis Daerah Kerian Meminda zon guna kawalan perancangan tanah berdasarkan kelulusan Tukar Syarat Tanah, Kebenaran Merancang dan pembangunan
  • Data Standardization Analysis to Form Geo-Demographics Classification Profiles Using K-Means Algorithms

    Data Standardization Analysis to Form Geo-Demographics Classification Profiles Using K-Means Algorithms

    GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 12 issue 6 (34 - 42) 34 Themed issue on current social, economic, cultural and spatial dynamics of Malaysia’s transformation © 2016, ISSN 2180-2491 Improving the tool for analyzing Malaysia’s demographic change: Data standardization analysis to form geo-demographics classification profiles using k-means algorithms Kamarul Ismail1, Nasir Nayan1, Siti Naielah Ibrahim1 1Jabatan Geografi dan Alam Sekitar, Fakulti Sains Kemanusiaan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak Correspondence: Kamarul Ismail (email: [email protected]) Abstract Clustering is one of the important methods in data exploratory in this era because it is widely applied in data mining.Clustering of data is necessary to produce geo-demographic classification where k-means algorithm is used as cluster algorithm. K-means is one of the methods commonly used in cluster algorithm because it is more significant. However, before any data are executed on cluster analysis it is necessary to conduct some analysis to ensure the variable used in the cluster analysis is appropriate and does not have a recurring information. One analysis that needs to be done is the standardization data analysis. This study observed which standardization method was more effective in the analysis process of Malaysia’s population and housing census data for the Perak state. The rationale was that standardized data would simplify the execution of k-means algorithm. The standardized methods chosen to test the data accuracy were the z-score and range standardization method. From the analysis conducted it was found that the range standardization method was more suitable to be used for the data examined.
  • PERAK P = Parlimen / Parliament N = Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) / State Constituencies

    PERAK P = Parlimen / Parliament N = Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) / State Constituencies

    PERAK P = Parlimen / Parliament N = Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) / State Constituencies KAWASAN / STATE PENYANDANG / INCUMBENT PARTI / PARTY P054 GERIK HASBULLAH BIN OSMAN BN N05401 - PENGKALAN HULU AZNEL BIN IBRAHIM BN N05402 – TEMENGGOR SALBIAH BINTI MOHAMED BN P055 LENGGONG SHAMSUL ANUAR BIN NASARAH BN N05503 – KENERING MOHD TARMIZI BIN IDRIS BN N05504 - KOTA TAMPAN SAARANI BIN MOHAMAD BN P056 LARUT HAMZAH BIN ZAINUDIN BN N05605 – SELAMA MOHAMAD DAUD BIN MOHD YUSOFF BN N05606 - KUBU GAJAH AHMAD HASBULLAH BIN ALIAS BN N05607 - BATU KURAU MUHAMMAD AMIN BIN ZAKARIA BN P057 PARIT BUNTAR MUJAHID BIN YUSOF PAS N05708 - TITI SERONG ABU BAKAR BIN HAJI HUSSIAN PAS N05709 - KUALA KURAU ABDUL YUNUS B JAMAHRI PAS P058 BAGAN SERAI NOOR AZMI BIN GHAZALI BN N05810 - ALOR PONGSU SHAM BIN MAT SAHAT BN N05811 - GUNONG MOHD ZAWAWI BIN ABU HASSAN PAS SEMANGGOL N05812 - SELINSING HUSIN BIN DIN PAS P059 BUKIT GANTANG IDRIS BIN AHMAD PAS N05913 - KUALA SAPETANG CHUA YEE LING PKR N05914 - CHANGKAT JERING MOHAMMAD NIZAR BIN JAMALUDDIN PAS N05915 - TRONG ZABRI BIN ABD. WAHID BN P060 TAIPING NGA KOR MING DAP N06016 – KAMUNTING MOHAMMAD ZAHIR BIN ABDUL KHALID BN N06017 - POKOK ASSAM TEH KOK LIM DAP N06018 – AULONG LEOW THYE YIH DAP P061 PADANG RENGAS MOHAMED NAZRI BIN ABDUL AZIZ BN N06119 – CHENDEROH ZAINUN BIN MAT NOOR BN N06120 - LUBOK MERBAU SITI SALMAH BINTI MAT JUSAK BN P062 SUNGAI SIPUT MICHAEL JEYAKUMAR DEVARAJ PKR N06221 – LINTANG MOHD ZOLKAFLY BIN HARUN BN N06222 - JALONG LOH SZE YEE DAP P063 TAMBUN AHMAD HUSNI BIN MOHAMAD HANADZLAH BN N06323 – MANJOI MOHAMAD ZIAD BIN MOHAMED ZAINAL ABIDIN BN N06324 - HULU KINTA AMINUDDIN BIN MD HANAFIAH BN P064 IPOH TIMOR SU KEONG SIONG DAP N06425 – CANNING WONG KAH WOH (DAP) DAP N06426 - TEBING TINGGI ONG BOON PIOW (DAP) DAP N06427 - PASIR PINJI LEE CHUAN HOW (DAP) DAP P065 IPOH BARAT M.
  • Taklimat Tender Penuh Kk3 Manjoi

    Taklimat Tender Penuh Kk3 Manjoi

    TAKLIMAT TENDER MENYIAPKAN BAKI KERJA KLINIK KESIHATAN JENIS 3 (KK3) MANJOI, IPOH, PERAK Oleh JABATAN KERJA RAYA NEGERI PERAK GRED / KATEGORI /PENGKHUSUSAN / TARAF / JENIS SYARIKAT I) MEMPUNYAI SIJIL KONTRAKTOR PENYIAP KEMENTERIAN KERJA RAYA CONTOH II) BERDAFTAR DENGAN CIDB : Gred G7 III) Kategori :B IV) Pengkhususan :B04 V) Tender Terbuka VI)T1 TEMPOH SIAP MAKSIMUM TEMPOH SIAP MAKSIMUM YANG DITETAPKAN ADALAH 104 MINGGU. PENJUALAN DOKUMEN TENDER ATAS TALIAN Petender hendaklah mengambil perhatian bahawa Dokumen Tender untuk projek ini akan dijual secara salinan lembut (softcopy) di atas talian. Dokumen Tender hanya akan dijual kepada petender yang layak berdasarkan kepada maklumat pendaftaran yang dikemukakan oleh petender melalui Borang Saringan Wajib. Petender yang layak akan menerima nombor akaun melalui e-mel untuk membuat pembayaran secara atas talian dalam tempoh penjualan yang telah ditetapkan. Pembayaran secara atas talian yang dibenarkan adalah secara transaksi segera (instant transfer) sahaja dan bukti transaksi perlu dikemukakan melalui e-mel sebagai slip bayaran. PETENDER HENDAKLAH MENGEMUKAKAN RESIT PEMBAYARAN DI DALAM SAMPUL YANG BERASINGAN SEMASA MENGEMUKAKAN DOKUMEN TENDER SEBELUM ATAU PADA TARIKH TUTUP TENDER. Nota : Petender hendaklah merujuk Arahan Kepada Petender untuk maklumat terperinci. BORANG-BORANG MAKLUMAT YANG PERLU DILENGKAPI OLEH PETENDER BORANG A - Surat Pengakuan Kebenaran Maklumat dan Kesahihan Dokumen Yang Dikemukakan Oleh Petender BORANG B - Maklumat Am dan Latar Belakang Petender BORANG C - Data Kewangan
  • Property Market Review 2018 / 2019 Contents

    Property Market Review 2018 / 2019 Contents

    PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW 2018 / 2019 CONTENTS Foreword Property Northern 02 04 Market 07 Region Snapshot Central Southern East Coast 31 Region 57 Region 75 Region East Malaysia The Year Glossary 99 Region 115 Ahead 117 This publication is prepared by Rahim & Co Research for information only. It highlights only selected projects as examples in order to provide a general overview of property market trends. Whilst reasonable care has been exercised in preparing this document, it is subject to change without notice. Interested parties should not rely on the statements or representations made in this document but must satisfy themselves through their own investigation or otherwise as to the accuracy. This publication may not be reproduced in any form or in any manner, in part or as a whole, without writen permission from the publisher, Rahim & Co Research. The publisher accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or to any party for reliance on the contents of this publication. 2 FOREWORD by Tan Sri Dato’ (Dr) Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman 2018 has been an eventful year for all Malaysians, as Speed Rail) project. This move was lauded by the World witnessed by Pakatan Harapan’s historical win in the 14th Bank, who is expecting Malaysia’s economy to expand at General Election. The word “Hope”, or in the parlance of 4.7% in 2019 and 4.6% in 2020 – a slower growth rate in the younger generation – “#Hope”, could well just be the the short term as a trade-off for greater stability ahead, theme to aptly define and summarize the current year and as the nation addresses its public sector debt and source possibly the year ahead.
  • Upper Kinta Basin Environmental Assessment Report

    Upper Kinta Basin Environmental Assessment Report

    UPPER KINTA BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PREPARED BY: IN COORPERATION WITH: Upper Kinta Baseline Environmental Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ii Page Table of Contents iii List of Tables v List of Figures vii List of Annexes x Global Environment Centre Nov 2018 Upper Kinta Baseline Environmental Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS iii Page CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1-1 1.2 OBJECTIVES 1-2 1.2.1 Target beneficiaries 1-3 1.3 BASELINE STUDY 1-4 1.3.1 Format of this report 1-5 CHAPTER 2: UPPER KINTA BASIN 2.1 PROJECT AREA 2-1 2.2 METHODOLOGY 2-2 2.3 SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS 2-3 2.3.1 Climate 2-3 2.3.2 Geology and Soil Type 2-3 2.3.3 Water Supply 2-4 2.3.4 Demography 2-6 2.3.5 Land Use Assessment 2-9 2.4 LAND USE WITHIN UKB 2-10 2.4.1 Forest 2-11 2.4.2 Agriculture 2-12 2.4.3 Residential and Transportation Facility 2-12 2.4.4 Industries 2-13 2.4.5 Waterbody 2-15 2.4.6 Others 2-16 2.5 LAND USE AND WATER BODIES 2-17 CHAPTER 3: POLLUTION SOURCE RAPID INVENTORY 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3-1 3.2 METHODOLOGY 3-2 3.2.1 Pollution Source Inventory 3-2 3.2.2 Water Quality Study 3-2 3.2.2.1 Secondary Data Collection 3-2 3.2.2.2 Sampling by GEC Team 3-4 3.2.3 Biological Water Quality Study 3-7 3.3 RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS 3-8 3.3.1 Pollution Source Inventory 3-8 3.3.2 Water Quality Status 3-31 3.3.2.1 Water Quality Monitoring by Agencies 3-31 3.3.2.2 Overall UKB Water Quality Status 3-32 3.3.2.3 Impact of Development Activities 3-38 3.3.2.4 Water Quality Status before Dam 3-39 3.3.3 Biological Water Quality Status 3-40 3.3.3.1 Distribution
  • CRC Perak) Clinical Research Centre, Perak (CRC Perak) ANNUAL REPORT 2008

    CRC Perak) Clinical Research Centre, Perak (CRC Perak) ANNUAL REPORT 2008

    1 Pusat Penyedidikan Klinikal, Perak (CRC Perak) Clinical Research Centre, Perak (CRC Perak) ANNUAL REPORT 2008 Research Committee Head: Dr Amar-Singh HSS , Senior Consultant Paediatrician & Head, Paediatric Department Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun Ipoh, Perak Members: Dr G.P. Letchuman Ramanathan , Senior Consultant Physician, Head, Medical Department, Hospital Taiping, Perak Dr Japaraj Robert Peter , Senior O&G Consultant, O&G Department, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun Ipoh, Perak Dato’ Dr Suarn Singh Jasmit Singh , Senior Consultant Psychiatrist & Director, Bahagia Hospital Ulu Kinta, Perak Dr Marina Kamaruddin , Director, Gerik Hospital, Perak Dr Paranthaman Family Medicine Specialist, Pejabat Kesihatan Daerah Kinta, Perak Support staff: Lina Hashim Aina Juana Mior Anuar Yon Rafizah Hanim Samsudin Key Output/Achievement for 2008 (Summary) • 7 Publications/Manuscripts • 10 Patient Registries Supported • 57 Research Projects supported • 33 Clinical Trial Feasibilities • 10 Research Projects developed • 126 NMRR Registrations • 5 Research Training courses conducted • 32 on-going Clinical Trials • 60 Research Tutorials/Consultations • 180 Research Projects in Perak for 2008 Introduction & Brief Historical Account The CRC-Ipoh officially began functioning in March 2001. The CRC was initially based at the 9th floor of the hospital. The CRC secretariat was initially combined with the QA secretariat to maximise support staff. CRC Ipoh was shifted to 4 th Floor, Kompleks Rawatan Harian (ACC Building) in year 2006. And on the same year the Network CRC was officially setup, 12 state hospitals include Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun Ipoh Perak were involved. The CRC us currently equipped with a network server and workstations to support research in the Perak region. CRC Ipoh was re-name CRC Perak in 2007 to reflect the role of supporting research in Perak state.