Phylogenetic Relationships Among Eighteen Neotropical Culicini Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogenetic Relationships Among Eighteen Neotropical Culicini Species Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 16(2):75-.g5,2OOO Copyright @ 20OO by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG EIGHTEEN NEOTROPICAL CULICINI SPECIES JUAN-CARLOS NAVARRO aNp JONATHAN LIRIA Instituto de Zoologia Tropical, Facultad de Ciencias, Laboratorio de Biologia de Vectores, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado 47058, Caracas I04I_A, Venezuela ABSTRACT. The subgeneric relationships among 8 generic and infrageneric taxa of the Culicini rribe were examined by cladistic analysis based on 30 larval mouthpart characters (maxillae and mandibles) of7 subgenera of Culex L. and I of Deinocerites Theobald. We analyzed 18 ingroup species as well as Deinocerites melano- phylum Dyar and Knab as a sister group, and Aedes taeniorhynchus Wiedemann as an outgroup. A parsimony analysis using the Nona program resulted in 2 trees each of lO9 steps (consistency and retention indices : 0.88j. The topologies obtained were similar to the current classification of the tribe, based on nonexplicit methods mainly including adult characters, with 2 exceptions. In the present work, the monophyly of the tribe Culicini (Culex * Deinoceites) was supported by 4 synapomorphies. The subgenus Lutzia Theobald formed the most basal clade in the tribe Culicini and the placement of Phenacomyra Harbach and Peyton as a subgenus was validated by its location as a sister group of the subgenus Culex and other subgenera. The subgenus Carrollia Lutz was the most robust taxon, supported by 5 synapomorphies, and was congruent with the infragroups of the current classification. The relationships arnong Deinocerites, Anoedioporpa Dyar, Microculex Theobald, and Melanoconion Theobald were unresolved, but were placed in the most internal clade of the tribe. The lst exception to the accepted classification was the poorly resolved boundary between Anoedioporpa and Microculex The 2nd was the strong support (with 1 I synapomorphies) for the inclusion of Deinocerites as a subgenus of Culex in the Culicini, which is proposed here. KEY \ilORDS cladistics, Culex, Cnlicidae, Deinocerites, larval mouthparts, mandibles, maxillae, phylogeny INTRODUCTION natural classification of the Culicidae. Cladistics us- Since the pioneering work of Edwards (1932) ing molecular characters has been used by Pape (1992) and Dyar (1923, 1928) the taxonomy and classifi- with chromosomal characters in Anopheles (Cellia): (1992) cation of the family Culicidae has been based on Wesson et al. with Aedesa Besansky (1994) classical adult and immature morphologic charac- et al. with Anopheles gambiae, and Miller (1996) ters. Although the use of holomorphology in sys- et al. with the Pipiens Complex. All of these tematics inference (Hennig 1966) is preferred, re- studies have used ribosomal DNA. However, Be- (1997) cent authors have found that larval mouthparts sansky and Fahey estimated phylogenetic provide good morphologic characters for alpha tax- relationships among 14 Culicidae species using the gene. onomy (Harbach and Peyton 1993) and their use in white-eye phylogenetics should be explored. Using classical morphologic characters and cla- (1996) Snodgrass (1959) was the lst to describe the distic analyses, Judd studied the tribe Sa- bethini and (1998) morphology of some mosquito mouthparts and Harbach and Kitching analyzed 34 genera Knight (1971) showed the structural diversity in the of Culicidae. However, despite conclu- mandibles of several genera. Later, Harbach and sions about the higher relationships in the family, (infrageneric) Knight (1977) reported a variety of maxillary struc- the internal relationships remain tures and shapes that offer additional diagnostic largely unresolved. characters for identifi cation. We used larval mouthpart characters to infer Harbach and Peyton (1993) resumed studies with phylogenetic relationships among taxa within the some species of the tribe Sabethini and recognized tribe Culicini. We examined species belonging to 7 the importance of these structures for the identifi- of 8 subgenera reported from Venezuela, and 13 cation of generic taxa; they suggested their use to that occur in the Neotropics. We also evaluated the power achieve more natural classifications. Recently, Pe- and importance of larval mouthparts in the rez and Navarro (1996) reported diagnostic char- cladistic analysis in obtaining a natural classifica- acters for 3 subgenera of Anopheles Meigen, and tion for this medically important taxon. concluded that morphology of mouthparts is an ad- ditional tool for identification of these taxa. MATERIALS AND METHODS Despite extensive alpha taxonomy studies of Cu- licidae, phylogenetic relationships have not been Source of specimens.' We used 4th-stage-larvae intensively studied. The large size of the family belonging to the Mosquito Collection of the La- (3,000 species) (Knight and Stone 1977) represents boratorio de Biologfa de Vectores, Museo de Bio- a challenge. The new taxonomy described by Mun- logfa of the Universidad Central de Venezuela stermann and Conn (1997) represents a powerful (LBY after Guimardes 1997). These specimens approach toward obtaining a more objective and came from a variety of different breeding sites (Ta- JoURNALor rns AuerrcAN MosQUno Coxrnol AssocmrroN Vol. 16,No.2 Table l. List of species examined with data of locality in Venezuela, date of collection, and breeding site. Species Locality Date Breeding site Culex (Carrollia) bihaicolus Loma de Hierro, Aragua State Feb. 1992 Heliconia aurea Cx. (Car.) rausseoi Loma de Hierro, Aragua State Feb.1992 Palm spathes Euterpe sp. Cx. (Car.) iridescens Hacienda Rfo Claro, Zulia State Aug. 1995 Palms spathes Euterpe sp. Cx. (Car.) urichi La Azulita, M€rida State Dec. 1981 Xanthosoma sp. Cx. (P he nac omyia) c orni ge r Panaquire, Miranda State Dec.198l Cacao husks Cx. (Andoedioporpa) bam- Panaquire, Miranda State Feb. 1986 Bamboo internodes borum Cx. (Culex) dolosus La Azulita, Mdrida State March 1995 Discarded tire/rockhole Cx. (Cux.) nigripalpus El Jobo (Sinamaica), Zulia State Ocr. 1997 Tiee hole at ground level Cx. (Cux.) coronator Instituto de Zoologia Tropical UCV, Aug. 1997 Artificial container Caracas, D.E Cx. (Cux.) quinquefosciatus Cementerio del Sur, Caracas, D.E Jan.1981 Artificial container Cx. (Microculex) microphy- Guanay Tepui, Amazonas State Feb. 1995 Brocchinia tatei lus Cx. (Mcx.) chryselatus Sierra de San Luis, Falc6n State Aug. 1993 Guzmania mucronata Cx. (Mcx.) pleuristriatus Cerro Santa Ana. Fa1c6n State Aug. 1993 Aechmea aquilega Cx. (Melanoconion) albi- Hacienda Las Nubes, Zulia State Oct. 1997 Ground pool with aquatic plants nens$ "grapo Cx. (Mel.) atratus" Haciendas Las Nubes/Rfo Claro, Oct. 1997 Ground pools Zulia State Cx. (Mel.) nicceriensis Haciendas Las Nubes/Rfo Claro, Oct. 1997 Ground pools Zulia State Cx. (Lutzia) bigoti Sierra San Luis, Falc6n State April 1994 Discarded tire Deinoce rite s me lanophylum Cayo Borracho, Falc6n State Jan.1983 Crab hole Aedes taeniorhynchus Guajira-Paraguaipoa, Zulia State Oct. 1986 Ground pools in mangroves ble l). A total of 19 species was examined. These species), and also Aedes taeniorhynchus Wiedmann belonged to the subgenera Anoedioporpa Dyar (l and Deinocerites melanophylum Dyar and Knab. species), Microculex Theobald (3 species), Lutaia Mounting techniques and terminology: Larvae Theobald (l species), Culex L. (4 species), Melan- were stored in 8OVaethanol and clarified in a lOTo oconion Theobald (3 species), Carrollia Lltz (4 KOH solution, then processed as described by Har- species), and Phenacomyia Harbach and Peyton (1 bach and Peyton (1993), with the modifications of Perez and Navarro (1996). A total of 30 characters was scored. These consisted of 16 characters as- sociated with mandibles and 14 characters of the maxillae (Appendix 1). Characters were scored based on the nomenclature of Harbach and Knight (1980). The generic and subgeneric abbreviations followed those of Reinert (1975). Drawings of the morphometric characters used are shown in Fig. 1. A schematic of the general morphology from each supraspeciflc taxon examined is shown in Figs. 2a (Lutzia), 2b (Phenacomyia), 3a (Culex), 3b (Car- rollia), 4a (Deinocerites), 4b (Melanoconion), 5a (Anoedioporpa), and 5b (Microculex). Selection of characters and cladistics analysis: Characters were selected based upon the results of previous papers that also used mouthpart structures (Knight 1971, Harbach and Knight 1977, Harbach and Peyton 1993, Perez and Navarro 1996). We also included new characters (character [ch.] 13, PMnL, and ch. 15, ppMAdA) not previously stud- ied based on structural diversity (Appendix 1). Polymorphic (multistate characters) were also in- cluded in the data set. Characters not determined in one or more taxa were treated as missing. Fig. 1. Morphometric measurements for some man- The genus Aedes Meigen (Ae. taeniorhynchus) dibular and maxillary structures. was chosen as outgroup to root trees but without JUNE2000 PHyr-ocnNsrrc RpLarroNsrnpsrr..i CwrcrNr 77 ,ffi, Fig.2. a. Ventral (left) and dorsal (right) view of Cu- lex (Lutzia) bigoti. Mandibles (above) and maxillae (be- low) are shown. b. Ventral (left) and dorsal (righr) view of Culex (Phenacomyia) corniger. Mandibles (above) and maxillae (below) are shown. Fig. 3. a. Ventral (left) and dorsal (right) view of Cu- the intention of exploring the sister relationships of lex (Culex) dolosus. Mandibles (above) and maxillae (be- Culicini. Choice of this taxon as outgroup is sup- low) are shown. b. Ventral (left) and dorsal
Recommended publications
  • Culex Pipiens, House Mosquito
    http://www.MetaPathogen.com: Culex pipiens, house mosquito cellular organisms - Eukaryota - Fungi/Metazoa group - Metazoa - Eumetazoa - Bilateria - Coelomata - Protostomia - Panarthropoda - Arthropoda - Mandibulata - Pancrustacea - Hexapoda - Insecta - Dicondylia - Pterygota - Neoptera - Endopterygota - Diptera - Nematocera - Culicimorpha - Culicoidea - Culicidae - Culicinae - Culicini - - Culex - Culex pipiens complex - Culex pipiens Brief facts ● Culex mosquitos are the most widely distributed mosquito in the world. The most important of the Culex vectors are members of the Culex pipiens complex, a very closely related group of species (or incipient species - the taxonomy remains unclear) that originated in Africa but has spread by human activity to tropical and temperate climate zones on all continents but Antarctica. ● Culex pipiens mosquitos are important vectors of human pathogens in the United States and world-wide. They carry a number of devastating diseases such as St. Louis encephalitis (SLE), West Nile encephalitis, Eastern equine encephalitis, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, Japanese encephalitis, Ross River encephalitis, Murray Valley encephalitis, Rift valley fever, and lymphatic filariases. Culex mosquitos are competent to transmit heartworms. Detailed information about ubiquitous parasites - heartworms, Dirofilaria immitis at MetaPathogen. ● Culex pipiens is normally considered to be a bird feeder but some urban strains have a predilection for mammalian hosts and feed readily on humans. ● The genome sequence of a member
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Scan Data
    Selbyana 15: 132-149 CHECKLIST OF VENEZUELAN BROMELIACEAE WITH NOTES ON SPECIES DISTRIBUTION BY STATE AND LEVELS OF ENDEMISM BRUCE K. HOLST Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, USA ABSTRACf. A checklist of the 24 genera and 364 native species ofBromeliaceae known from Venezuela is presented, including their occurrence by state and indications of which are endemic to the country. A comparison of the number of genera and species known from Mesoamerica (southern Mexico to Panama), Colombia, Venezuela, the Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana), Ecuador, and Peru is presented, as well as a summary of the number of species and endemic species in each Venezuelan state. RESUMEN. Se presenta un listado de los 24 generos y 364 especies nativas de Bromeliaceae que se conocen de Venezuela, junto con sus distribuciones por estado y una indicaci6n cuales son endemicas a Venezuela. Se presenta tambien una comparaci6n del numero de los generos y especies de Mesoamerica (sur de Mexico a Panama), Colombia, Venezuela, las Guayanas (Guyana, Suriname, Guyana Francesa), Ecuador, y Peru, y un resumen del numero de especies y numero de especies endemicas de cada estado de Venezuela. INTRODUCTION Bromeliaceae (Smith 1971), and Revision of the Guayana Highland Bromeliaceae (Smith 1986). The checklist ofVenezuelan Bromeliaceae pre­ Several additional country records were reported sented below (Appendix 1) adds three genera in works by Smith and Read (1982), Luther (Brewcaria, Neoregelia, and Steyerbromelia) and (1984), Morillo (1986), and Oliva-Esteva and 71 species to the totals for the country since the Steyermark (1987). Author abbreviations used last summary of Venezuelan bromeliads in the in the checklist follow Brummit and Powell Flora de Venezuela series which contained 293 (1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Sandra J. Heinemann and John N. Belkin2 for General Information And
    Mosquito Systematics vol. lO(3) 1978 365 Collection Records of the Project “Mosquitoes of Middle America” 11. Venezuela (VZ); Guianas: French Guiana (FG, FGC), Guyana (GUY), Surinam (SUR)’ SandraJ. Heinemann and John N. Belkin2 For generalinformation and collectionsfrom the Dominican Republic (RDO) the first publication of this seriesshould be consulted(Belkin and Heinemann 1973). Any departurefrom the method in this publication is indicated below. Publications2-6 of the series(Belkin and Heinemann 1975a, 1975b, 1976a, 1976b, 1976~) recordeddata on collectionsfrom the remainderof the West Indies except Jama& ca (Belkin, Heinemann and Page 1970: 255-304) and the islandsadjacent to Venezuela as well asTrini- dad and Tobago (to be coveredlater). Publication7 on collectionsfrom Costa Rica (Heinemann and Belkin 1977a) begantreatment of Central America and publication 8 coveredthe rest of nuclearCentral America (Heinemann and Belkin 1977b). Publication9 was devoted to Mexico (Heinemann and Belkin 1977c), publication 10 dealt with the extensivecollections in Panama(including Canal Zone) (Heinemann and Belkin 1978) and the pre- sent publication beginscoverage of South America. The collectionsin Venezuelaand the Guianascould not have been made without the interest and assistanceof cooperatorsof the project. We are greatly indebted to theseindividuals and their organiza- tions for the facilities, transportationand assistanceas well as the donation of collectionsto the project. In Venezuelawe are indebted to Arnold0 Gabaldon, Lacenio Guerrero, Pablo Cova Garciaand Juan Pulido, all of Direction de Malariologiay SaneamientoAmbiental, Ministerio de Sanidady Asistencia Social;G. H. Bergoldand Octavia M. Suarez,Departamento de Virologia, Instituto Venezolano de Invest- igacionesCientificas (IVIC); and Felipe J. Martin, Departamentode Zoologia Agricola, Facultad de Agro- nomia, UniversidadCentral de Venezuela,Maracay.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Mosquito Species (Diptera: Culicidae) of Bangladesh Seth R
    Irish et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:559 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1848-z RESEARCH Open Access A review of the mosquito species (Diptera: Culicidae) of Bangladesh Seth R. Irish1*, Hasan Mohammad Al-Amin2, Mohammad Shafiul Alam2 and Ralph E. Harbach3 Abstract Background: Diseases caused by mosquito-borne pathogens remain an important source of morbidity and mortality in Bangladesh. To better control the vectors that transmit the agents of disease, and hence the diseases they cause, and to appreciate the diversity of the family Culicidae, it is important to have an up-to-date list of the species present in the country. Original records were collected from a literature review to compile a list of the species recorded in Bangladesh. Results: Records for 123 species were collected, although some species had only a single record. This is an increase of ten species over the most recent complete list, compiled nearly 30 years ago. Collection records of three additional species are included here: Anopheles pseudowillmori, Armigeres malayi and Mimomyia luzonensis. Conclusions: While this work constitutes the most complete list of mosquito species collected in Bangladesh, further work is needed to refine this list and understand the distributions of those species within the country. Improved morphological and molecular methods of identification will allow the refinement of this list in years to come. Keywords: Species list, Mosquitoes, Bangladesh, Culicidae Background separation of Pakistan and India in 1947, Aslamkhan [11] Several diseases in Bangladesh are caused by mosquito- published checklists for mosquito species, indicating which borne pathogens. Malaria remains an important cause of were found in East Pakistan (Bangladesh).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes of Western Uganda
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author J Med Entomol Manuscript Author . Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 May 26. Published in final edited form as: J Med Entomol. 2012 November ; 49(6): 1289–1306. doi:10.1603/me12111. Mosquitoes of Western Uganda J.-P. Mutebi1, M. B. Crabtree1, R. J. Kent Crockett1, A. M. Powers1, J. J. Lutwama2, and B. R. Miller1 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 3150 Rampart Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521. 2Department of Arbovirology, Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI), P.O. Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda. Abstract The mosquito fauna in many areas of western Uganda has never been studied and is currently unknown. One area, Bwamba County, has been previously studied and documented but the species lists have not been updated for more than 40 years. This paucity of data makes it difficult to determine which arthropod-borne viruses pose a risk to human or animal populations. Using CO2 baited-light traps, from 2008 through 2010, 67,731 mosquitoes were captured at five locations in western Uganda including Mweya, Sempaya, Maramagambo, Bwindi (BINP), and Kibale (KNP). Overall, 88 mosquito species, 7 subspecies and 7 species groups in 10 genera were collected. The largest number of species was collected at Sempaya (65 species), followed by Maramagambo (45), Mweya (34), BINP (33), and KNP (22). However, species diversity was highest in BINP (Simpson’s Diversity Index 1-D = 0.85), followed by KNP (0.80), Maramagambo (0.79), Sempaya (0.67), and Mweya (0.56). Only six species (Aedes (Aedimorphus) cumminsii (Theobald), Aedes (Neomelaniconion) circumluteolus (Theobald), Culex (Culex) antennatus (Becker), Culex (Culex) decens group, Culex (Lutzia) tigripes De Grandpre and De Charmoy, and Culex (Oculeomyia) annulioris Theobald), were collected from all 5 sites suggesting large differences in species composition among sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Culicidae: Culicini): a Cautionary Account of Conflict and Support
    Insect Systematics & Evolution 46 (2015) 269–290 brill.com/ise The phylogenetic conundrum of Lutzia (Diptera: Culicidae: Culicini): a cautionary account of conflict and support Ian J. Kitching, C. Lorna Culverwell and Ralph E. Harbach* Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Published online 12 May 2014; published online 10 June 2015 Abstract Lutzia Theobald was reduced to a subgenus ofCulex in 1932 and was treated as such until it was restored to its original generic status in 2003, based mainly on modifications of the larvae for predation. Previous phylogenetic studies based on morphological and molecular data have provided conflicting support for the generic status of Lutzia: analyses of morphological data support the generic status whereas analyses based on DNA sequences do not. Our previous phylogenetic analyses of Culicini (based on 169 morpho- logical characters and 86 species representing the four genera and 26 subgenera of Culicini, most informal group taxa of subgenus Culex and five outgroup species from other tribes) seemed to indicate a conflict between adult and larval morphological data. Hence, we conducted a series of comparative and data exclu- sion analyses to determine whether the alternative positions of Lutzia are due to conflicting signal or to a lack of strong signal. We found that separate and combined analyses of adult and larval data support dif- ferent patterns of relationships between Lutzia and other Culicini. However, the majority of conflicting clades are poorly supported and once these are removed from consideration, most of the topological dis- parity disappears, along with much of the resolution, suggesting that morphology alone does not have sufficiently strong signal to resolve the position ofLutzia .
    [Show full text]
  • Med. Entomol. Zool. 55(3): 217-231 (2004)
    (M ed. Ent omo l. Zoo l. V ol. 55 NO. 3 p .217 -231 2004 ) Studies Studies on the pupal mosquitoes of Japan (11) Su bgenera Oculeomyi α(stat. nov.) and Siriv αnαkα rnius (nov.) of the the genus Culex ,with a key of pupal mosquitoes from Ogasawara-gunto (Diptera: Culicidae) Kazuo T ANAKA M inamida i,2 -1-39-2 08,S aga m ihara,2 28 -08 14 Japan (Receiv ed: 29 M arch 2004 ;Ac cept ed: 30 Jun e 2004 ) Abstract: Abstract: The pupae of Culex (Oculeomyia) bitaenior} 勺mchus and Cx . (Sirivanakar- nius) nius) boninensis are described and their taxonomic characters are discussed . Chaeto- taxy taxy tables and full illustrations for these two species are prepared. Oculeomyia is r esurrected from synonymy with the subgenus Culex and given subgeneric status to include include Culex bitaeniorhynchus and Cx . sinensis. A new subgenus Sirivan α karnius is established established for Culex boninensis . A key to species of the pupa of mosquitoes from Ogasawara-gunto Ogasawara-gunto is presented Key words : mosquito pupa ,morphotaxonomy ,Culex ,Oculeomyia ,Sirivanakarnius , Japan Japan This paper is a revision of the pupae of Culex bitaeniorhynchus , Cx. sinensis and Cx. boninensis ,which previously have been included in the subgenus Culex. In this occasion , 1 transfer the former two species to the subgenus Oculeomyia previously treated as a synonym of the subgenus Culex ,and establish a new subgenus Siriv αnakarnius for the lattermost lattermost species. Principles Principles and methods of this study concerning the pupae follow Tanaka (1999 , 2001); 2001); terminology of the adults and larvae follows Tanaka et al., 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Nominotypical Subgenus of Culex \(Diptera
    Systematics and Biodiversity (2017), 15(4): 296–306 Research Article Phylogeny of the nominotypical subgenus of Culex (Diptera: Culicidae): insights from analyses of anatomical data into interspecific relationships and species groups in an unresolved tree RALPH E. HARBACH, C. LORNA CULVERWELL & IAN J. KITCHING Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK (Received 26 April 2016; accepted 13 October 2016) The aim of this study was to produce the first objective and comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the speciose subgenus Culex based on morphological data. We used implied and equally weighted parsimony methods to analyse a dataset comprised of 286 characters of the larval, pupal, and adult stages of 150 species of the subgenus and an outgroup of 17 species. We determined the optimal support by summing the GC supports for each MPC, selecting the cladograms with the highest supports to generate a strict consensus tree. We then collapsed the branches with GC support < 1 to obtain the ‘best’ topography of relationships. The analyses largely failed to resolve relationships among the species and the informal groups in which they are currently placed based on morphological similarities and differences. All analyses, however, support the monophyly of genus Culex. With the exception of the Atriceps Group, the analyses failed to find positive support for any of the informal species groups (monophyly of the Duttoni Group could not be established because only one of the two species of the group was included in the analyses). Since the analyses would seem to include sufficient data for phylogenetic reconstruction, lack of resolution appears to be the result of inadequate or conflicting character data, and perhaps incorrect homology assessments.
    [Show full text]
  • Brocchinia Reducta Light Preferences
    BROCCHINIA REDUCTA LIGHT PREFERENCES BARRY RICE • P.O. Box 72741 • Davis, CA 95617 • USA • [email protected] Keywords: cultivation: Brocchinia reducta, lighting. Brocchinia reducta is one of those species of plants that has, at best, mixed support by carnivorous plant growers. The plant’s problem is that it is usually relegated to the ranks of semi- carnivory, or even noncarnivory. This is because it apparently does not produce its own digestive enzymes, nor does it seem particularly specialized for capturing insects. In fact, most photographs of the plant in cultivation show that it looks like a fairly unimpressive, urn-shaped bromeliad (see Figures 1, 2). I have grown this plant for nearly a decade, and agree that in most settings it is indeed a rather boring bromeliad. I do not even maintain plants in my own collection, instead I grow the plants at the University of California (Davis) collections. It is trivial to grow—it does not seem to care too much about the soil medium, and keeping it in a 1:1:1 sand:perlite:peat mix or 3:1 perlite:sphagnum mix and temperatures anywhere in the range 15-35ºC (60-95ºF) works just fine. I provide the plants with purified water, which I pour directly into the pitcher urn. I do not fertilize them. Typically a plant matures within a few years, produces an inflorescence, and then dies. As it rots away, two or more new shoots emerge from the plant—these are called pups by bromeli- ad growers—and they can be separated when the parent plant rots away.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Compounds That Attract Arthropods- Patent 2001
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 7-31-2001 Chemical Compounds that Attract Arthropods- Patent 2001 Ulrich R. Bernier University of Florida, [email protected] Daniel L. Kline USDA Donald Barnard USDA Kenneth Posey USDA Matthew Booth USDA See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Part of the Agricultural Science Commons Bernier, Ulrich R.; Kline, Daniel L.; Barnard, Donald; Posey, Kenneth; Booth, Matthew; and Yost, Richard A., "Chemical Compounds that Attract Arthropods- Patent 2001" (2001). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 973. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/973 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Ulrich R. Bernier, Daniel L. Kline, Donald Barnard, Kenneth Posey, Matthew Booth, and Richard A. Yost This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ usdaarsfacpub/973 111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 US006267953Bl (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,267,953 BI Bernier et ai. (45) Date of Patent: Jui. 31, 2001 (54) CHEMICAL COMPOSITION THAT Carlson, D.A., et aI., "Carbon Dioxide Released from ATTRACT ARTHROPODS Human Skin: Effect of Temperature and Insect Repellents", Journal of Medical Entomology, 29 (2), 165-170, (1992).
    [Show full text]
  • A New European Mosquito Species: Culex
    L-~------- I European Mosquito Bulletin, 15 (2003), 6-11. ! f Journal of the European Mosquito Control Association ISSN1460-6127 A new European mosqnito species: Culex (Neoculex) ellTOpaelIS (Dipten: Culicidae) Helena Da Cunha Ramos1• 2, Henrique Ribeiro1 and Bruce A Harrison3 lUnidade de Entomologia Medica, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Jmqueira, 96, 1349-008 Lisboa, portugal. Email: [email protected] 2Centro de Zoologia, Instituto de Investiga~o Cientitica Tropical, Jmqueira, 14, 1349-008 Lisboa, portugal. 3 Public Health Pest Management Section, North Carolina Depanment of Environment and Natural Resources, 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27107, USA. Abstnet The male, female, larva and pupa of Culex (Neoculex) europaeus, sp. novo are described on the basis of the examination of material from Portugal and comparison with reared specimens of Culex (Neoculex) territans from North Carolina, USA. The recognition of the new taxon is discussed and diagnostic identitication keys to the male and female genitalia and pupa are provided. Introduction Culex te"itans Walker was described from the "United States" (Walker, 1856), but the type locality was restricted later to Charlestoo (Charleston County), South Carolina, by Belkin et al. (1966). Furthermore, Belkin (1%8) was mable to locate the type specimen of Cx. te"itans and consida'ed it "presmnably lost" and non-extent. Sirivanakam (1971) considered Cx. te"itans the most widely spread member of the subgenus Neoculex Dyar, since it occurs in both the Eastern and Western Hemispheres. In North America, ex. te"itans has a very wide distribution to include parts of Alaska and Canada, and most of the contiguous United States except for several southwestern states (Darsie & Ward, 1981).
    [Show full text]