DOCSLIB.ORG

York Outer Liberal Democrats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
York Outer Liberal Democrats Submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England on Warding Arrangements as part of the Electoral Review of City of York Council 14 January 2013 City of York Council Liberal Democrat Group York Outer Liberal Democrat Local Party Introduction This submission sets out proposals for warding arrangements based on the Commission’s proposed council size of 47 elected members representing a variety of one, two and three member wards. This submission has given consideration to the Commission’s technical guidance and the statutory criteria with an overall aim to establish a pattern of wards that achieves good electoral equality, reflects community identity and provides for effective and convenient local government. We have sought to use strong easily-identifiable boundaries when deciding where ward should be drawn and we have attempted to strike a balance between the need to reflect local identity with the statutory duty to ensure that everyone’s vote is of equal value regardless of where they live in York. Most of the electoral wards in York are broadly accurate reflections of local community interests. Given the Commission’s recommendation that the council stay at 47 elected members, our submission has suggested ways of ‘tidying up’ existing wards that are currently projected to be significantly above or below the average electorate per councillor by 2018 (‘the quota’) in a way that is sensitive to community identity on the ground. Statutory Criteria As the Commission will be aware, Schedule 2 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 requires any proposal for new warding arrangements to have regard to the following statutory criteria: the need to secure equality of representation; the need to secure effective and convenient local government, and the need to reflect the identities and interests of local communities. Equality of Representation In our submission we have aimed to ensure equality of electoral representation, whilst maintaining community identity. Our proposals would see no ward created that 1 is more than 9% outside the average electorate per councillor by 2018. 21 of the 25 proposed wards are within 5% of this threshold. Effective and Convenient Local Government In our submission we have aimed to ensure that the wards are as conducive as possible to effective representation by elected members. While geographical unity is important we have also considered demographic unity and community identity. Community Identity The LGBCE guidance states that community identity “cannot be easily measured and can often mean many different things to different people.” In our review we have sought to maintain as far as possible the historic distinction between York’s urban unparished area (administered by the former York City Council) and the suburban and rural parished areas that were located in the Ryedale, Selby and Harrogate districts of North Yorkshire before local government reorganization in 1996. We have sought to join areas which share common interests and characteristics. We have sought to use obvious and identifiable physical boundaries between communities, especially the Ouse, York’s largest river as well as some of the smaller waterways, stretches of the city’s bar walls, major roads and railway lines. Parishes of York York’s Parish Councils represent democracy at its most local level. We have maintained the system preferred by the Commission of using parishes as the building blocks of our proposed wards. We have divided our submission into three geographical areas of York, using the River Ouse and the parished and unparished areas as our general dividing lines (see Map 1). Area west of the River Ouse (currently represented by 17 councillors) The current electoral wards of Acomb, Bishopthorpe, Dringhouses & Woodthorpe, Holgate, Micklegate, Rural West York and Westfield. Unparished area east of the River Ouse (currently 13 councillors) The current electoral wards of Clifton, Fishergate, Guildhall, Heworth and Hull Road. Parished area east of River Ouse (currently 17 councillors) The current electoral wards of Derwent, Fulford, Haxby and Wigginton, Heslington, Heworth Without (see note on parishing below), Huntington and New Earswick, Osbaldwick, Skelton, Rawcliffe and Clifton Without, Strensall and Wheldrake. 2 Map 1 – Proposed Geographical Areas for Warding Arrangements in York, showing existing ward boundaries Proposed Wards We have included draft names for our proposed wards although we are open to alternative suggestions from the Commission, residents and local community groups. Rural and suburban wards east of the River Ouse (17 councillors) The most pressing problem in this area is the electoral inequality in the wards of Derwent, Fulford and Heslington. In addition, the Strensall ward is projected to be 7% below quota by 2018. We propose no changes to the following wards: . Haxby and Wigginton . Heworth Without . Huntington and New Earswick . Osbaldwick 3 . Skelton, Rawcliffe and Clifton Without . Wheldrake . Fulford – our preferred option would see no change to the boundaries of Fulford Ward, detailed reasons for this are set out below. Note on Heworth Without As the Commission may be aware, Heworth Without Ward historically shared the same boundaries of the Heworth Without Parish but was expanded at the last review to take in a small area of York’s unparished area between Malton Road and Stockton Lane. We understand that there will be a community governance review in York next year. It is the view of the Liberal Democrat Group that it would be in the best interests of convenient and effective local government if this review could consider parishing this area of Heworth Without. 4 Derwent, Heslington and Strensall The Derwent ward is currently projected to be 13% below quota and Heslington 20% above quota. The University of York campus has grown significantly over the last few years with more on-campus student accommodation scheduled to open in the next academic year. Our proposals for this area seek to solve both problems while improving community identity and securing effective and convenient local government. Heslington We propose creating a new ‘University’ ward that would encompass the University of York campus. This would be a single-member ward, roughly coterminous with polling districts YEB and YEC. This change might necessitate the Commission recommending the warding of Heslington Parish – we propose that the area covering Heslington village (roughly polling district YEA) is separated from the eight colleges of the University of York to create two parish wards, ‘University’ and ‘Village’ respectively. ‘Village’ ward could be linked with one of the neighbouring parishes (we have proposed either Dunnington or Fulford) to create a new single-member ward. We appreciate the Commission is generally unwilling to split parishes; however in this unusual case it is our view that an exception would be in the best interests of local community identity. We understand that our proposal enjoys the support of some members of the University of York Student’s Union (YUSU) Community Assembly and many residents in Heslington village. The villagers currently form a mere 15% of the total electorate in the ward and their views were summed up at the last review by one respondent who stated “there is no clear reason why the University should remain forever part of this essentially rural ward [Heslington].” He went on to suggest that Heslington village should “join adjoining rural areas.” These changes would allow the differing needs of the two communities in Heslington to be better represented by two councillors accountable to the separate electorates. The new University Ward would provide good electoral equality and reflect community identity and interests. Based on the experience of other cities including Middlesborough, Preston, Norwich and Hull a ward based around a university rather than a parish would provide effective and convenient local government for the student population. Crucially, rather than isolate students it would ensure that their views were properly represented. Under our proposed scheme, students who live off-campus would still form a significant minority in the wards surrounding the university. Students who live in the private rented sector have similar needs to other local residents, e.g. information on refuse collection, anti-social behaviour issues and shared local facilities. By comparison, students who live in accommodation provided by the university have altogether different needs, especially as for most this will be their first experience of living in York; either as first-years, international or visiting students. Therefore they need different types of local representation from their councillor and our proposals reflect this. 5 We have two proposals for the Commission as to which of the neighbouring parishes Heslington village could be linked with. Either Heslington could join with Dunnington and Kexby to form a new ward – ‘Dunnington and Heslington,’ or could be linked with Fulford (see below). There are a number of road links between Dunnington and Heslington – via Field Lane and Hull Road, or along Common Lane. The two areas are both thriving village communities with similar demographics and shared local concerns. An elected member would be able to focus specifically on the concerns of full-time residents in both areas. The new ward, while geographically larger, would therefore better reflect community identity than the current Heslington Village/University
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hambleton Local Plan Local Plan Publication Draft July 2019
    Hambleton Local Plan Local Plan Publication Draft July 2019 Hambleton...a place to grow Foreword iv 1 Introduction and Background 5 The Role of the Local Plan 5 Part 1: Spatial Strategy and Development Policies 9 2 Issues shaping the Local Plan 10 Spatial Portrait of Hambleton 10 Key Issues 20 3 Vision and Spatial Development Strategy 32 Spatial Vision 32 Spatial Development Strategy 35 S 1: Sustainable Development Principles 35 S 2: Strategic Priorities and Requirements 37 S 3: Spatial Distribution 41 S 4: Neighbourhood Planning 47 S 5: Development in the Countryside 49 S 6: York Green Belt 54 S 7: The Historic Environment 55 The Key Diagram 58 4 Supporting Economic Growth 61 Meeting Hambleton's Employment Requirements 61 EG 1: Meeting Hambleton's Employment Requirement 62 EG 2: Protection and Enhancement of Employment Land 65 EG 3: Town Centre Retail and Leisure Provision 71 EG 4: Management of Town Centres 75 EG 5: Vibrant Market Towns 79 EG 6: Commercial Buildings, Signs and Advertisements 83 EG 7: Rural Businesses 85 EG 8: The Visitor Economy 89 5 Supporting Housing Growth 91 Meeting Hambleton's Housing Need 91 HG 1: Housing Delivery 93 HG 2: Delivering the Right Type of Homes 96 HG 3: Affordable Housing Requirements 100 HG 4: Housing Exception Schemes 103 HG 5: Windfall Housing Development 107 HG 6: Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 109 Hambleton Local Plan: Publication Draft - Hambleton District Council 1 6 Supporting a High Quality Environment 111 E 1: Design 111 E 2: Amenity 118 E 3: The Natural Environment 121 E
    [Show full text]
  • 2 SEPTEMBER 2019 at 7.30Pm
    RUFFORTH WITH KNAPTON PARISH COUNCIL MEETING TO BE HELD IN RUFFORTH VILLAGE INSTITUTE ON MONDAY 2 SEPTEMBER 2019 AT 7.30pm AGENDA 153 Public Comments: an opportunity for members of the public to comment on the agenda or to bring matters to the attention of the council 154 Apologies and Reason for Absence: to accept apologies and reason 155 To receive Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interest (not previously declared) by Councillors on any of the agenda items below 156 Minutes of Previous Meetings: Minutes of 1 July and 22 July 2019 to be agreed and signed as a true record 157 Ward Councillors’ Comments: an opportunity for Ward Councillors to raise any matters concerning the Parish 158 Clerk’s Report: to update council on outstanding issues arising from previous meetings: • Bradley Crescent noticeboard • Road outside Hendeka and the Wetherby Road just before the Hessay junction • Condition of PROWs 159 Finance: Monthly financial report by the Clerk a. Invoices to be paid: Clerk’s Salary + Burial fees £ 775.22 To ratify payments already made: Clerks salary 31 July 2019 £ 375.48 AJT Garden Services for work to cycle path £ 540.00 Stephensons memorial Works for 10 Faculty stones for NBG £ 180.00 AJT Garden Services for grass cutting £ 432.00 b. Payments received: Invoice 202 Interment + plot NBG £ 1164.00 Invoice 203 Single burial plot purchased NBG £ 873.00 Invoice 204 2x Single plot + 1x Interment NBG £ 2037.00 c. Funds available d. External Audit by PKF Littlejohn LLP 160 Burial Grounds: a. Report on Burials b. Maintenance in Burial Grounds c.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Sustainable Community: Life in Derwenthorpe, York, 2012–2018
    Making a sustainable community: life in Derwenthorpe, York, 2012–2018 by Deborah Quilgars, Alison Dyke, Alison Wallace and Sarah West This report presents the results of a six-year evaluation of Derwenthorpe, an urban extension of about 500 homes in York, developed by the Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust (JRHT) and David Wilson Homes. The research documented the extent to which it met its aims to create a socially and environmentally sustainable community ‘fit for the 21st century’. Making a sustainable community: life in Derwenthorpe, York, 2012– 2018 Deborah Quilgars, Alison Dyke, Alison Wallace and Sarah West This report presents the results of a six-year evaluation of Derwenthorpe, an urban extension of about 500 homes in York, developed by the Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust (JRHT) and David Wilson Homes. The research documented the extent to which it met its aims to create a socially and environmentally sustainable community ‘fit for the 21st century’. The research demonstrated that mainstream housing developers can successfully deliver sustainable homes and communities at scale, in particular delivering high-quality living environments. However, technical build issues and differential buy-in from residents means that environmental and social measures need to be built into the model as far as possible from the outset. The research involved an environmental survey and longitudinal qualitative interviews to document residents’ experiences over the period 2012–2018. It also compared Derwenthorpe with three other sustainable housing developments in England. Actions • Greater emphasis on the design, space standards and aesthetics of new developments should be incorporated into Government-level directives. • Housing providers must work with resident groups to set up inclusive governance structures to promote the long-term social sustainability of communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 01/04/2014, 17.30
    Notice of a public meeting of Cabinet To: Councillors Alexander (Chair), Crisp, Cunningham- Cross, Levene, Looker, Merrett, Simpson-Laing (Vice- Chair) and Williams Date: Tuesday, 1 April 2014 Time: 5.30 pm Venue: The George Hudson Board Room - 1st Floor West Offices (F045) A G E N D A Notice to Members - Calling In : Members are reminded that, should they wish to call in any item* on this agenda, notice must be given to Democracy Support Group by 4:00 pm on Thursday 3 April 2014 . *With the exception of matters that have been the subject of a previous call in, require Full Council approval or are urgent which are not subject to the call-in provisions. Any called in items will be considered by the Corporate and Scrutiny Management Committee. 1. Declarations of Interest At this point, Members are asked to declare: • any personal interests not included on the Register of Interests • any prejudicial interests or • any disclosable pecuniary interests which they may have in respect of business on this agenda. 2. Exclusion of Press and Public To consider the exclusion of the press and public from the meeting during consideration of the following: Annexes 1 to 4 to Agenda Item 8 (Formation of a Y.P.O. Limited Company) on the grounds that they contain information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information). This information is classed as exempt under paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A to Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as revised by The Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Local Plan Consultation 2021 Response
    Escrick Parish Council response to Selby District Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation 2021 Please find below the response from Escrick Parish Council to the Selby District Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation 2021. We have structured our responses as follows: 1) Feedback on the consultation process and timing. 2) Relevant local context – a summary of key issues pertaining to Escrick Parish. 3) Comments on specific sites in / around Escrick Parish. 4) Responses to selected questions from the consultation. 1. Consultation process and timing We wish to raise concerns with the consultation process and timescales. The consultation period has fallen during a period of national lock-down where public meetings are not possible, and many of the normal activities that would stimulate interest through ‘word of mouth’ are suspended. We found that awareness of the consultation was low. Even where there was awareness of consultation, the understanding of the topics it dealt with and potential impacts of its conclusions were not well understood. We were told by SDC that every household would receive a letter advising of the consultation, but at the time of writing we are only aware of one Escrick resident receiving one, which was not received until early March and had no clear deadline on it. Having checked with Stillingfleet residents, they report the same. Other publicity has focused around online and other media, which will clearly have a demographic bias in their audience. By the time many residents found out about the consultation, the two public online events had already passed. Many residents reported difficulty navigating the consultation portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Records of Copmanthorpe
    Parish Records of Copmanthorpe Finding Aid PR PARISH RECORDS (on deposit) COPMANTHORPE Ainsty D. (WR) now deanery of Ainsty COP 1- 3 Parish registers [see also 40-42] 1 baptisms 1759-1812 burials 1759-1812 2 baptisms 1813-1885 3/ burials 1813-1947 ' Churchwardens' accounts and vestry minutes 1846-1926 5/ Terrier 1861 6.: Order in Council separating the Chapelry of Upper Poppleton from the benefice of Copmanthorpe and uniting the Chapelry to the parish of Nether Poppleton 1866 712 Six conveyances of land to he used as additional burial ground 1817-1872 13' Petition of inhabitants concerning allocation of certain parts of burial, ground 1872 l4 Banns book 1876-1965 15-16 Terriers and inventories 15/ 1899 16/ 1933 17-26 Registers of services [see also 43-44] 17I862-1869 8 ,_ 1870-1888 1-9-- 1888-1905 261905-1914 2T-' 1915-1919 22-'1919-1923 23 - 1923-1926 24 1926-1934 2511935-1945 26 27----1957-1967 aa-- Churchwardens' account book 1878-1914 29-30 Licences for burials 2.99 burial ground 1868 (with plan) 30 addition to burial. ground 1872 (with plan) 3,1 Record of agreement of parishioners that the trustees of the Wesleyan Chapel extend their new wall 10 feet from their present wall at the top (churchyard) sides provided they give up as much land at the bottom side (with plan) 1872 continued ..... PR PARISH RECORDS (on deposit) (continued) COPMANTHORPE (continued) COP 32-37 Faculties [see also 49] 32' to re-roof church9 build new chancel, vestry and organ chamber, to re-floor and re-seat church9 to re-site fittings 1889 33 war memorial brass
    [Show full text]
  • The Copmanthorpe Story -So Here It Is
    The Copmanthorpe Story INDEX 1 General information 2 The Danes 3 Changes in name 4 - 12 Lords of the Manor 13 - 14 John Wood 15 - 16 Extract from Court Rolls 17 - 19 Knights Templars 20 - Old land measures 21 - 26 St Giles 27 Gibbet 27 - 28 Methodist Chapel 29 - 32 The Old School 32 - 34 Copmanthorpe Station 34 - 36 The Youth Club 36 - 37 The Recreation Centre 37 - 38 The Womens Institute 38 The Parish Council 39 - 40 The Conservation Area 40 - 49 Houses and People 49 Trades and Population 50 Census Returns 51 - 52 Poorhouses 52 - 53 Population 53 - 54 Roads 54 - 57 Drome Road - 57 Squadron RFC 57 - 59 Change 59 - 60 Library 60 Yorkshire Pudding The Coat of Arms on the cover of this book is reproduced from the original bookplate used by John Wood, Lord of the Manor of Copmanthorpe from 1709 to 1757. The bookplate was donated by Mr. Anthony Boynton Wood, the present Lord of the Manor of Copmanthorpe who has very kindly given his permission to use the bookplate in this manner. First printed 1983 Second Extended-version 1995 I originally wrote this little book for the benefit of the Copmanthorpe Village Trust, sadly now defunct. There have been many requests since then for the Copmanthorpe Story -so here it is. More information has been found so this book is now in an extended form. I am particularly grateful to Mr. Anthony Boynton Wood, Lord of the Manor of Copmanthorpe for his original research which has provided such invaluable information about his family and the Lords of the Manor of Copmanthorpe much of which was hitherto unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
    The Planning Inspectorate Report to the Secretary of 4/09 Kite Wing Temple Quay House 2 The Square State for Communities and Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6PN 0117 372 6372 Local Government e-mail: enquiries@planning- inspectorate.gsi.gov.uk by D R Cullingford BA MPhil MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Date 2 March 2007 Local Government CITY OF YORK COUNCIL Applications by PERSIMMON HOMES (YORKSHIRE) LIMITED & HOGG BUILDERS (YORK) LIMITED & THE JOSEPH ROWNTREE HOUSING TRUST Inquiry held from 13 June to 24 July 2006 Formal site visits undertaken on 25 & 28 July 2006 with additional visits on 30 & 31 August and 19-21 September 2006 Land at Germany Beck, east of Fordlands Road, Fulford, York, & Land west of Metcalfe Lane, Osbaldwick, York File References: APP/C2741/V/05/1189897 & YH 5343/310/2 APP/C2741/V/05/1189885 & YH 5343/310/1 Report: APP/C2741/V/05/1189897 & APP/C2741/V/05/1189885 CONTENTS 1. PROCEDURAL MATTERS ............................................................................................................................................ 3 THE SCHEMES IN OUTLINE; AGREEMENTS AND CONDITIONS...................................................................................................... 4 THE PRE INQUIRY MEETING...................................................................................................................................................... 6 The state of planning policy in York...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notices and Proceedings: North East of England: 2 June 2017
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 2269 PUBLICATION DATE: 02/06/2017 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 23/06/2017 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 249 8142 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Notices and Proceedings will be published on: 09/06/2017 Publication Price £3.50 (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: operatorlicensing@otc.gsi.gov.uk Remember to keep your bus registrations up to date - check yours on https://www.gov.uk/manage-commercial-vehicle-operator-licence-online NOTICES AND PROCEEDINGS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede sections where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications and requests reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners Copies of Notices and Proceedings can be inspected free of charge at the Office of the Traffic Commissioner in Leeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Safety Overview and Scrutiny Committee Restructure Of
    Community Safety Overview and Scrutiny Committee Restructure of North Yorkshire Police 1. Background 1.1 On Monday (13 December 2010) the Home Office announced grant funding settlements for police forces in England and Wales incorporating a 5.1% reduction. For North Yorkshire Police, this equates to a reduction of approximately £24m by 2014/15. This settlement ensures comprehensive plans to balance the budget will have to be put into action. North Yorkshire Police force will undergo a significant restructure to maximise efficiency whilst protecting front- line service delivery. 2. Introduction 2.1 It is recognised that public sector spending cuts will have significant implications for the police service. As a service, policing has had a “can do” ethos and will rise to the challenge, but it is recognised this will not be easy. Nationally it is understood that there are difficult choices ahead for police leaders at all levels of the service; for police partners; and for government. 2.2 The scale of cuts that are before North Yorkshire Police force are, however, so significant that “protecting the frontline” cannot mean maintaining the front line at current levels”. In this context protection is more about mitigating the impacts and ensuring all other avenues for efficiencies are exploited, before reaching the point where frontline resources are reduced. This includes changing the way we use and deploy officers to maximise their impact in the community. 2.3 The reviews that have been undertaken in North Yorkshire Police have helped the organisation further understand the demands it faces on a day to day basis across the force wide area (North Yorkshire & City of York).
    [Show full text]
  • The Parish of Marston Moor Encompasses St. Mary, Askham Richard; St
    The Parish of Marston Moor encompasses St. Mary, Askham Richard; St. James, Bilbrough; All Saints, Long Marston; All Saints, Rufforth and The Epiphany, Tockwith. There are schools in four of the five villages, three of them Church of England and one community, and the Ministry team and parishioners across the Parish are delighted that we have such a great relationship with all of these. We are pleased that you have decided to apply for the post of Head Teacher at St. Mary’s and hope that you find the school as welcoming and loving as we do. We realise that a new Head Teacher will bring new ideas but we are hoping as a church that we can continue to have a fruitful relationship with the school in the years to come. Due to the large catchment that the school covers my colleague Richard Battersby, from the churches of ‘Rural Ainsty’, shares the weekly worship we provide in school. There are also regular Open the Book and Godly Play worship which is led by our Reader, Ann Watson, and Sue Elgie, an RPA and Churchwarden, also helps out with the worship and is the main contact between school and church. We have held ‘Experience Church’ days in the church and the school use the church for worship termly, the offer is always there for the school to use the church as often as they wish. Due to the fact that there are 4 primary schools I have taken the decision that I would be unable to be a Governor at all of them so I have passed my role onto very competent members of our congregations, who can focus much more time and energy to the tremendous work that the governing body do.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA-Based Kinship Analysis
    pid11(1).qxp 3/17/2008 3:25 PM Page 3 KINSHIP ANALYSIS DNA-Based Kinship Analysis By Chris Maguire and Michael Woodward The Forensic Science Service, Birmingham, England What is kinship analysis? Relatedness between individuals and groups can be investigated using DNA For kinship analysis, markers. A child’s DNA profile is a combination of alleles passed down from the autosomal STR father and mother. This means that relationships can be investigated between markers are the most alleged family members. discriminating and are DNA profiling is commonly used to test for potential paternity, parentage and used routinely in The sibship (whether people are related as brothers or sisters) relationships. In many Forensic Science forensic cases more complex relationships have to be considered. Service. In addition, What are common applications of kinship analysis? mitochondrial DNA In The Forensic Science Service’s experience, common applications of kinship can be used to analysis are paternity, forensic casework and immigration disputes. More unusual examine the maternal circumstances can include identifying victims of mass disasters or recovered remains in missing person enquiries. The Forensic Science Service has designed line, and Y-STRs are the FSS-ibd application to analyse all of these types of relationship problems and used to study to be particularly useful in more complex relationship scenarios, where the paternal-line software application can complete the analysis in minutes. It is an effective tool inheritance patterns. that is cost-efficient, reduces processing times and creates unique reports according to the user’s programmed specifications. The FSS routinely uses kinship analysis in forensic casework and commercial applications for clients in the UK and internationally.
    [Show full text]