Meson Quarks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meson Quarks Physics 56400 Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I Lecture 11 Fall 2019 Semester Prof. Matthew Jones Hadronic Isospin Multiplets 푝 • Nucleons: 푛 휋+ • Pions: 휋0 휋− ∆++ ∆+ • Delta resonances: ∆0 ∆− Baryon Antiparticles • Baryons have baryon number B=+1 • Anti-baryons will have baryon number B=-1 • Baryon number is conserved in strong interactions • Production of anti-protons must proceed as follow: 푝 + 푝 → 푝 + 푝 + 푝 + 푝ҧ or 푝 + 푛 → 푝 + 푛 + 푝 + 푝ҧ • What is the minimum beam energy needed to make anti-protons in a fixed target experiment? Baryon Antiparticles Beam proton: m 푝푏 = 퐸푏, 푝Ԧ푏 Target proton: 푝푡 = 푚푝, 0 Final state: 푝푓 = 4퐸푝, 4푝Ԧ푝 2 2 푝Ԧ 퐸푏 − 푚푝 푝Ԧ = 푏 = 푝 4 4 2 2 퐸푏 + 푚푝 2 퐸 − 푚푝 퐸 = = 푝Ԧ + 푚2 = 푏 + 푚2 푝 4 푝 푝 16 푝 2 2 2 2 퐸 + 2퐸푏푚푝 + 푚푝 퐸 + 15푚푝 푏 = 푏 16 16 퐸푏 = 7푚푝 = 6.57 GeV 푇푏 = 6푚푝 = 5.63 GeV (kinetic energy of beam proton) Anti-protons Brookhaven Cosmotron (1953) 퐸 = 3 GeV Berkeley Bevatron (1954) 퐸 = 6 GeV Anti-proton discovered in 1955 by Chamberlain and Segré. Nobel prize in 1959. Baryon Anti-particles • Using the Dirac sea idea, an anti-proton is equivalent to the absence of a negative-energy proton. • If a negative energy proton has isospin 퐼3 = +1/2 then its absence looks like 퐼3 = −1/2. 푛ത 1/2 • Anti-protons: = 푝ҧ −1/2 ∆ത+ 3/2 ത0 1/2 • Anti-deltas: ∆ = ∆ത− −1/2 ∆ത−− −3/2 • Anti-baryons also have odd-parity. • Pions: – 휋+ and 휋− are anti-particles, – 휋0 is its own anti-particle. Vector Mesons • 푒+푒− collisions can produce states of spin-1: • The 휌 770 multiplet contains three charge states: 휌+ 휌0 휌− • They form an isospin triplet (I=1). • They have odd parity. • They decay to pairs of pions: 휌+ → 휋+휋0 휌0 → 휋+휋− Strange Mesons (d) (e) (b) (a) (c) a) Incident proton b) Interaction with target nucleus c) Outgoing proton d) Outgoing charged particle e) Decay of a long-lived neutral particle, 푉0 → 휋+휋− Strange Mesons • First observed in high-altitude cloud chamber experiments • Strange mesons were easily produced in strong interactions, but only in pairs. • Strange mesons had long lifetimes so they must decay weakly even though there were no leptons in the final state. • Proposal: – These particles carry a new quantum number (strangeness) – Strangeness is conserved in strong interactions – Strange particles are produced in particle/anti-particle pairs to conserve strangeness – Strange particles cannot decay strongly – The lightest positively charged strange meson assigned S=+1 Strange Hadrons • Types of strange particles: – Neutral mesons: 푉0 → 휋+휋− – Charged mesons: 휏+ → 휋+휋−휋+ Parity -1 휃+ → 휋+휋0 Parity +1 – Neutral baryons: Λ → 푝휋− • The 휏-휃 puzzle: – The 휏+ and 휃+ had exactly the same charge, mass, lifetime (they seemed to be the same particle) – They decayed to final states with different parity (they seemed to have opposite quantum numbers) – Parity must not necessarily be conserved in weak decays • Both are now know as the charged kaon, 퐾+ Strange Hadrons + − • Charged kaons: 퐾 and 퐾 , 푚퐾+ = 493.7 MeV 0 ഥ0 • Neutral kaons: 퐾 and 퐾 , 푚퐾0 = 497.6 MeV • These seemed to form two isospin doublets: 퐾+ 퐾ഥ0 퐾0 퐾− • The neutral Λ is an isospin singlet, 푚Λ = 1116 MeV • A triplet of strange baryons was observed: + 0 − Σ , Σ , Σ with similar mass, 푚Σ~1193 MeV • Decays: – Σ+ → 푝휋0, 푛휋+ with lifetime 80 ns Not particle/anti-particle! – Σ− → 푛휋− with lifetime 148 ns – Σ0 → Λ훾 with lifetime 10-19 seconds (electromagnetic decay conserves strangeness) Doubly Strange Baryons 퐾−푝 → 퐾+휩− 휩− → Λ휋− Λ → 푝휋− The Ξ− has S=-2 and decays weakly. The Ξ is sometimes called a “cascade”. Strange Resonances • Strange vector mesons: 퐾∗(892) 퐾∗+ → 퐾+휋0, 퐾0휋+ 퐾∗0 → 퐾+휋−, 퐾0휋0 • They also (rarely) decay electromagnetically: 퐾∗ → 퐾훾 (퐵퐹 ~ 10−3) • Vector mesons with no strangeness: 휙 1020 → 퐾+퐾−, 퐾0퐾ഥ0 휔 782 → 휋+휋−휋0, 휋0훾 • Strange baryon resonances: Σ∗−, Σ∗0, Σ∗+ Meson Multiplets • Plot 퐼3 on the x-axis and strangeness on the y-axis: (charge) Baryon Multiplets • Do the same for the baryons: 푚 Σ∗ − 푚 Δ = 153 MeV 푚 Ξ∗ − 푚 Σ∗ = 145 MeV Therefore, the Ω− mass is estimated to be about 푚 Ω− = 푚 Σ∗ + 150 MeV = 1530 MeV + 150 MeV = 1680 MeV Predicted independently by Gell-Mann and Ne’eman in 1961. The Omega Baryon Discovered in 1964 using an 80-inch bubble chamber at the 33 GeV Brookhaven AGS. 풎 휴− = ퟏퟔퟕퟐ 퐌퐞퐕 S=-3 Interpreting Hadron Multiplets • Group theoretic approach (Gell-Mann): ퟑ ⊗ ퟑഥ = ퟖ ⊕ ퟏ ퟑ ⊗ ퟑ ⊗ ퟑ = ퟏퟎ ⊕ ퟖ ⊕ ퟖ ⊕ ퟏ • Constituent particle approach (Zweig): – Three types of quarks: 푢, 푑, 푠 – Mesons are made of quark/anti-quark pairs – Baryons are made of three quarks – Quarks have charge 푞푢 = +2/3, 푞푑 = 푞푠 = − 1Τ3. – Quarks have spin 1/2 Quark Composition of the Mesons • Pseudoscalar mesons are |푞 ↑ 푞′ഥ ↓ൿ states • Vector mesons are |푞 ↑ 푞′ഥ ↑ൿ states Meson Quarks Meson Quarks 휋+ (푢푑ҧ) 휌+ (푢푑ҧ) 휋0 푢푢ത or 푑푑ҧ 휌0 푢푢ത or 푑푑ҧ 휋− (푑푢ത) 휌− (푑푢ത) 퐾+ (푢푠ҧ) 퐾∗+ (푢푠ҧ) 퐾0 (푑푠ҧ) 퐾∗0 (푑푠ҧ) 퐾ഥ0 (푠푑ҧ) 퐾ഥ∗0 (푠푑ҧ) 퐾− (푠푢ത) 퐾∗− (푠푢ത) 휂 ? 휔 ? 휂′ ? 휙 ? Quark Composition of the Baryons 1 ۧ↓↑↑ | Spin Τ2 baryons are combinations with • 3 ۧ↑↑↑ | Spin Τ2 baryons have • J=3/2 Baryon Quarks J=1/2 Baryon Quarks Δ++ (푢푢푢) 푝 (푢푢푑) Δ+ (푢푢푑) 푛 (푢푑푑) Δ0 (푢푑푑) + Σ (푢푢푠) Δ− (푑푑푑) 0 Σ (푢푑푠) Σ∗+ (푢푢푠) − Σ (푑푑푠) Σ∗0 (푢푑푠) 0 Ξ (푢푠푠) Σ∗− (푑푑푠) − Ξ (푑푠푠) Ξ∗0 (푢푠푠) Λ ? Ξ∗− (푑푠푠) Ω− (푠푠푠) The Quark Model • We can start to think of mesons as bound states of quarks (like the Hydrogen atom) • Spins that are ↑↑ are excited states of ↑↓ • The potential energy function must be of the form 푠Ԧ ∙ 푠Ԧ 푉 = 푉 푟 + 휅 1 2 푚1푚2 • If the strong interaction doesn’t care about quark flavor, then all mesons have the same ground-state energy. • Empirical mass formula: 푠Ԧ1 ∙ 푠Ԧ2 푚 = 푚1 + 푚2 + 휅 푚1푚2 • What are the expectation values of the 푠Ԧ1 ∙ 푠Ԧ2 operator? The Quark Model 2 Recall that 푆Ԧ = 푠Ԧ1 + 푠Ԧ2 and that 푆Ԧ = 푆(푆 + 1) 2 푆Ԧ = 푠Ԧ1 + 푠Ԧ2 ∙ 푠Ԧ1 + 푠Ԧ2 2 2 = 푠Ԧ1 + 푠Ԧ2 + 2 푠Ԧ1 ∙ 푠Ԧ2 1 2 푠Ԧ ∙ 푠Ԧ = 푆Ԧ − 푠Ԧ 2 − 푠Ԧ 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 3 = 푆 푆 + 1 − − 2 4 4 − 3Τ4 when 푆 = 0 푠Ԧ ∙ 푠Ԧ = ቊ (pseudoscalar) 1 2 + 1Τ4 when 푆 = 1 (vector) Quark Model Wave Functions • The neutral mesons are orthogonal linear combinations of 푢푢ത , 푑푑ҧ and (푠푠ҧ) states. 1 휋0 = 푢푢ത − 푑푑ҧ 2 1 휂 ≈ 푢푢ത + 푑푑ҧ − 2푠푠ҧ 6 1 휂′ ≈ 푢푢ത + 푑푑ҧ + 푠푠ҧ 3 • Vector mesons: 1 휌0 = 푢푢ത − 푑푑ҧ 2 1 휔 ≈ 푢푢ത + 푑푑ҧ 2 휙 ≈ 푠푠ҧ Color Quantum Numbers • Pauli’s exclusion principle states that identical Fermions can’t occupy the same state. • There is apparently a problem with the spin 3/2 baryons: ∆++= 푢 ↑ 푢 ↑ 푢 ↑ ∆−= 푑 ↑ 푑 ↑ 푑 ↑ Ω− = 푠 ↑ 푠 ↑ 푠 ↑ • Also, the exchange of identical fermions must be anti- symmetric. • It was proposed that quarks must carry an additional quantum number that we now call “color”. • The “color” part of the wave function is completely anti- symmetric. • Physical hadrons are color singlets – they have no net color charge. Color Wave Functions • Mesons always have the color symmetric wave function: 1 휓푐 = (푅푅ത + 퐺퐺ҧ + 퐵퐵ത) 3 • Baryons always have the color anti-symmetric wave function: 1 휓푐 = (푅퐺퐵 − 푅퐵퐺 + 퐺퐵푅 − 퐺푅퐵 + 퐵푅퐺 − 퐵퐺푅) 6 • These factor from the rest of the hadron spin-flavor wave function. • The baryon spin-flavor wave function must be symmetric. • Color eventually became a central concept in the description of the strong interaction. Orbital Angular Momentum • Bound states of quarks behave sort of like hydrogen atoms except – The masses of the constituents are similar – The quarks are light enough that they are relativistic • Nevertheless, excited hadrons can be associated with the same quantum numbers used to describe the hydrogen atom • Spectroscopic notation: 2푠+1 푛 퐿푗 • Orbital quantum numbers are written S, P, D, F for L=0,1,2,3,… • Many excited mesons have been assigned such quantum numbers… Excited Meson States Strong Decays of Hadrons • The “full width”, Γ, is interpreted as a decay rate: 푑푁 = −Γ푁푑푡 푁 푡 = 푁 0 푒−Γ푡 • The total decay rate is the sum of the decay rates to exclusive final states: 푛 Γ푡표푡푎푙 = ෍ Γ푖 푖=1 • The branching fraction is the probability that a specific final state will be observed: Γ푖 퐵푖 = Γ푡표푡푎푙 Strong Decays of Hadrons • Not derived here: statistical factor 푛 푛 3 2 S 푑 푝Ԧ푘 4 4 푑Γ = ℳ푓푖 ෑ 3 × 2휋 훿 푃 − ෍ 푝푘 2M 2휋 2퐸푘 푘=1 푘=1 (reduced) matrix element squared phase space of 4-momentum particles in the conserving delta- final state function • The phase space is the density of allowed quantum mechanical states with a specific energy. Strong Decays of Hadrons • Two-body decays: 푆 푝Ԧ 2 Γ = ℳ 8휋푀 푓푖 • Strictly speaking though, because of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, the energy (ie, mass) of the state might not be precisely known… ℏ Δ퐸Δ푡 ~ 2 1 Δ푡 = Γ • In practice, we can replace the delta-function over energy with a Breit-Wigner function: Strong Decays of Hadrons 1 훿 퐸 − 푀푅 → 2 2 퐸 − 푀푅 − Γ /4 휞 푬 푴푹 • The “mass” and “width” are parameters, determined from analyses of the resonance shape. Strong Decays of Hadrons • Strong decays will dominate unless they are forbidden by conservation laws • Electromagnetic decays will also occur (unless they are forbidden) but with lower rates • Weak decays generally dominate only when other decays are forbidden Γ ≈ 46 MeV Quark Current Lines • We can describe decay mechanisms by drawing the flow of quark currents • These are not strictly speaking Feynman diagrams, but they borrow some of the concepts – Time flows from left to right – Anti-quark currents flow backwards 푑 ∗0 + − 휋− = ቊ • Example: 퐾 → 퐾 휋 푢ത 푑 푝 = 287 MeV 퐾∗0 = ቊ 푢 푠ҧ 퐾+ = ൜ 푠ҧ – Fractions of 퐾+휋− and 퐾0휋0 are determined from isospin analysis… Isospin Analysis of Strong Decays 퐾∗0 → 퐾+휋− and 퐾∗0 → 퐾0휋0 1 2 ۧ−퐾∗0ۧ = |퐾0휋0ۧ − |퐾+휋| 3 3 퐵푟 퐾∗0 → 퐾+휋− = 0.667 퐵푟 퐾∗0 → 퐾0휋0 = 0.333 Electromagnetic Decays • These are similar to transitions in hydrogen atoms • Dipole transitions: γ + ۧ↓↑ | → ۧ↑↑ | • The electromagnetic coupling constant (훼) must be about 30 times smaller than the strong coupling constant (훼푠).
Recommended publications
  • The Charmed Double Bottom Baryon
    The charmed double bottom baryon Author: Marcel Roman´ı Rod´es. Facultat de F´ısica, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain. Advisor: Dr. Joan Soto i Riera (Dated: January 15, 2018) Abstract: The aim of this project is to calculate the wavefunction and energy of the ground 0 state of the Ωcbb baryon, which is made up of 2 bottom and 1 charm quarks. Such a particle has ++ not been found yet, but recent observation of the doubly charmed baryon Ξcc (ucc) indicates that a baryon with three heavy quarks may be found in the near future. In this work, we will use the fundamental representation of the SU(3) group to compute the interaction between the quarks, then we will follow the Born-Oppenheimer approximation to find the effective potential generated by the motion of the c quark, which will allow us to solve the Schr¨odinger equation for the bb system. The total spatial wavefunction we are looking for results from the product of the wavefunctions of the two components (c and bb). Finally, we will discuss the possible states taking into account the spin and color wavefunctions. I. INTRODUCTION II. THE STRONG INTERACTION The interaction between quarks is explained by Quan- In July 2017, the LHCb experiment at CERN reported tum Chromodynamics (QCD), which is a gauge theory the observation of the Ξ++ baryon [1], indicating that, cc based on the SU(3) symmetry group. At short distances, sooner rather than later, baryons made up of three heavy where the confinement term is negligible, the interaction quarks will be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Charmed Baryons at the Physical Point in 2+ 1 Flavor Lattice
    UTHEP-655 UTCCS-P-69 Charmed baryons at the physical point in 2+1 flavor lattice QCD Y. Namekawa1, S. Aoki1,2, K. -I. Ishikawa3, N. Ishizuka1,2, K. Kanaya2, Y. Kuramashi1,2,4, M. Okawa3, Y. Taniguchi1,2, A. Ukawa1,2, N. Ukita1 and T. Yoshi´e1,2 (PACS-CS Collaboration) 1 Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan 2 Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571, Japan 3 Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan 4 RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan (Dated: August 16, 2018) Abstract We investigate the charmed baryon mass spectrum using the relativistic heavy quark action on 2+1 flavor PACS-CS configurations previously generated on 323 64 lattice. The dynamical up- × down and strange quark masses are tuned to their physical values, reweighted from those employed in the configuration generation. At the physical point, the inverse lattice spacing determined from the Ω baryon mass gives a−1 = 2.194(10) GeV, and thus the spatial extent becomes L = 32a = 2.88(1) fm. Our results for the charmed baryon masses are consistent with experimental values, except for the mass of Ξcc, which has been measured by only one experimental group so far and has not been confirmed yet by others. In addition, we report values of other doubly and triply charmed baryon masses, which have never been measured experimentally. arXiv:1301.4743v2 [hep-lat] 24 Jan 2013 1 I. INTRODUCTION Recently, a lot of new experimental results are reported on charmed baryons [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2011.12166V3 [Hep-Lat] 15 Apr 2021
    LLNL-JRNL-816949, RIKEN-iTHEMS-Report-20, JLAB-THY-20-3290 Scale setting the M¨obiusdomain wall fermion on gradient-flowed HISQ action using the omega baryon mass and the gradient-flow scales t0 and w0 Nolan Miller,1 Logan Carpenter,2 Evan Berkowitz,3, 4 Chia Cheng Chang (5¶丞),5, 6, 7 Ben H¨orz,6 Dean Howarth,8, 6 Henry Monge-Camacho,9, 1 Enrico Rinaldi,10, 5 David A. Brantley,8 Christopher K¨orber,7, 6 Chris Bouchard,11 M.A. Clark,12 Arjun Singh Gambhir,13, 6 Christopher J. Monahan,14, 15 Amy Nicholson,1, 6 Pavlos Vranas,8, 6 and Andr´eWalker-Loud6, 8, 7 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3255, USA 2Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA 3Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 4Institut f¨urKernphysik and Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum J¨ulich,54245 J¨ulichGermany 5Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences Program (iTHEMS), RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan 6Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 7Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 8Physics Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA 9Escuela de F´ısca, Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501 San Jos´e,Costa Rica 10Arithmer Inc., R&D Headquarters, Minato, Tokyo 106-6040, Japan 11School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK 12NVIDIA Corporation, 2701 San Tomas Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA 13Design Physics Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA 14Department of Physics, The College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187, USA 15Theory Center, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606, USA (Dated: April 16, 2021 - 1:31) We report on a subpercent scale determination using the omega baryon mass and gradient-flow methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction Study of the S Particle Dark Matter Candidate at ALICE
    Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Heidelberg Reconstruction study of the S particle dark matter candidate at ALICE Master Thesis in Physics submitted by Fabio Leonardo Schlichtmann born in Heilbronn (Germany) March 2021 Abstract: This thesis deals with the sexaquark S, a proposed particle with uuddss quark content which might be strongly bound and is considered to be a reasonable dark matter can- didate. The S is supposed to be produced in Pb-Pb nuclear collisions and could interact with detector material, resulting in characteristic final states. A suitable way to observe final states is using the ALICE experiment which is capable of detecting charged and neutral particles and doing particle identification (PID). In this thesis the full reconstruction chain for the S particle is described, in particular the purity of particle identification for various kinds of particle species is studied in dependence of topological restrictions. Moreover, nuclear interactions in the detector material are considered with regard to their spatial distribution. Conceivable reactions channels of the S are discussed, a phase space simulation is done and the order of magnitude of possibly detectable S candidates is estimated. With regard to the reaction channels, various PID and topology cuts were defined and varied in order to find an S candidate. In total 2:17 · 108 Pb-Pb events from two different beam times were analyzed. The resulting S particle candidates were studied with regard to PID and methods of background estimation were applied. In conclusion we found in the channel S + p ! ¯p+ K+ + K0 + π+ a signal with a significance of up to 2.8, depending on the cuts, while no sizable signal was found in the other studied channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Parton Recombination Models
    Institute of Physics Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 50 (2006) 279–288 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/50/1/033 5th International Conference on Physics and Astrophysics of Quark Gluon Plasma Review of Parton Recombination Models Steffen A. Bass1,2 1 Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0305, USA 2 RIKEN BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Parton recombination models have been very successful in explaining data taken at RHIC on hadron spectra and emission patterns in Au+Au collisions at transverse momenta above 2 GeV/c, which have exhibited features which could not be understood in the framework of basic perturbative QCD. In this article I will review the current status on recombination models and outline which future challenges need to be addressed by this class of models. 1. Introduction Collisions of heavy nuclei at relativistic energies are expected to lead to the formation of a deconfined phase of strongly interacting nuclear matter, often referred to as a Quark-Gluon- Plasma (QGP). Recent data from the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven Lab have provided strong evidence for the existence of a transient QGP – among the most exciting findings are strong (hydrodynamic) collective flow [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], the suppression of high-pT particles [7, 8, 9, 10] and evidence for parton recombination as hadronization mechanism at intermediate transverse momenta [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. The development of parton recombination as a key hadronization mechanism for hadrons with transverse momenta up to a couple of GeV/c was triggered by a series of experimental observations which could not be understood in a straightforward manner either in the framework of perturbative QCD or via regular soft physics, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1810.08318V2 [Hep-Ph] 23 Oct 2018 H Atcedt Ru PG,Ecp O H Rudstate Ground the for Except (PDG), Ω Group Data Particle of the On
    Newly observed Ω(2012) state and strong decays of the low-lying Ω excitations 1 1,2,3 1,2,3 4,5 1,2,3 Zuo-Yun Wang , Long-Cheng Gui ,∗ Qi-Fang L¨u ,† Li-Ye Xiao , and Xian-Hui Zhong ‡ 1) Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, 2) Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Changsha 410081, China 3) Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications(SICQEA), Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081,China 4) Center of High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China and 5) School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Stimulated by the newly discovered Ω(2012) resonance at Belle II, in this work we have studied the OZI 3 allowed strong decays of the low-lying 1P- and 1D-wave Ω baryons within the P0 model. It is found that P Ω(2012) is most likely to be a 1P-wave Ω state with J = 3/2−. We also find that the Ω(2250) state could be assigned as a 1D-wave state with JP = 5/2+. The other missing 1P- and 1D-wave Ω baryons may have large potentials to be observed in their main decay channels. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION be completely ruled out. Furthermore, the mass and strong decay patten of Ω(2012) also were studied by QCD sum Ξ The study of hadron spectrum is an important way for us rule [18, 19]. As its mass is very close to (1530)K thresh- P = to understand strong interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Dark Matter- Dark Radiation Interactions
    Wandering in the Lyman-Alpha Forest: A Study of Dark Matter- Dark Radiation Interactions The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Krall, Rebecca, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, and Cora Dvorkin. 2017. Wandering in the Lyman-Alpha Forest: A Study of Dark Matter-Dark Radiation Interactions. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017, September. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41288101 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Prepared for submission to JCAP Wandering in the Lyman-alpha Forest: A Study of Dark Matter-Dark Radiation Interactions Rebecca Krall, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, and Cora Dvorkin Harvard University, Department of Physics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. The amplitude of large-scale matter fluctuations inferred from the observed Sunyaev- Zeldovich (SZ) cluster mass function and from weak gravitational lensing studies, when taken at face value, is in tension with measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO). In this work, we revisit whether this possible dis- crepancy can be attributed to new interactions in the dark matter sector. Focusing on a cosmological model where dark matter interacts with a dark radiation species until the epoch of matter-radiation equality, we find that measurements of the Lyman-alpha flux power spec- trum from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey provide no support to the hypothesis that new dark matter interactions can resolve the possible tension between CMB and large-scale structure (LSS).
    [Show full text]
  • The Leading Order Strange Quark-Connected Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment from Lattice QCD
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF PHYSICAL AND SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING School of Physics and Astronomy The Leading Order Strange Quark-Connected Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment From Lattice QCD by Matthew W. Spraggs Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2016 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF PHYSICAL AND SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING School of Physics and Astronomy Doctor of Philosophy THE LEADING ORDER STRANGE QUARK-CONNECTED CONTRIBUTION TO THE MUON ANOMALOUS MAGNETIC MOMENT FROM LATTICE QCD by Matthew W. Spraggs I present a calculation of the leading strange quark-connected contribution to the anoma- (2)had;s lous magnetic moment of the muon, aµ , using lattice QCD. The calculation is per- formed on two ensembles with lattice extents of 483 96 and 643 128 with associated × × inverse lattice spacings of 1:730(4)GeV and 2:359(7)GeV. These were generated with the Iwasaki gauge action and 2+1 dynamical quark flavours, which, along with the valence quarks, are represented on the lattice using the M¨obiusdomain wall fermion action. To account for a slight mistuning in the strange quark mass I use both unitary and partially quenched measurements on each ensemble. (2)had;s I principally use the hybrid method to determine aµ , and I implement several vari- ations of the method in order to quantify a systematic error associated with the selection of any particular variation. In addition, I use a Fourier transformation to compute the hadronic vacuum polarisation (HVP) at momenta not accessible on the lattice, a tech- nique called sine cardinal interpolation (SCI).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    z Available online at http://www.journalcra.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH International Journal of Current Research Vol. 10, Issue, 11, pp.75414-75420, November, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.32976.11.2018 ISSN: 0975-833X RESEARCH ARTICLE STANDARD MODEL PICTURE WITH 61 ELEMENTARY PARTICLES *Hermann Josef Scheuber Department of Chemistry, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: In 1960 Gell-Mann completed the «<Particle Zoo» with a picture simulating a 3-dimensional model: Received 19th August, 2018 Spin, Strangeness and an oblique incident charge with 3 investigated Quarks constructed in 10 Received in revised form Baryons. Until now the CERN scientists have found 61 elementary particles, but only 17 20th September, 2018 Fundamental particles are listed in a brick box as «Standard model». But if the Quarks really exist, Accepted 29th October, 2018 why not use Gell-Mann’s picture which I tried to enhance with modern media. This explains why – in th Published online 30 November, 2018 contrast to common practice - only pictures can be seen in this publication and NO Lagrange formula. Key Words: Standard Model, QCD, 61 Elementary Particles, Particle Physics with Pictures. Copyright © 2018, Hermann Josef Scheuber. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Citation: Hermann Josef Scheuber. 2018. “Standard Model Picture with 61 Elementary Particles”, International Journal of Current Research, 10, (11), 75414-75420. INTRODUCTION get a revolving Stereo picture. But as the publicizing possibilities are limited, the pictures here are restricted to If you have heard all about the fundamental particles in the momentarily chosen stationary ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) QCD Is the Theory That Describes the Action of the Strong Force
    Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) QCD is the theory that describes the action of the strong force. QCD was constructed in analogy to quantum electrodynamics (QED), the quantum field theory of the electromagnetic force. In QED the electromagnetic interactions of charged particles are described through the emission and subsequent absorption of massless photons (force carriers of QED); such interactions are not possible between uncharged, electrically neutral particles. By analogy with QED, quantum chromodynamics predicts the existence of gluons, which transmit the strong force between particles of matter that carry color, a strong charge. The color charge was introduced in 1964 by Greenberg to resolve spin-statistics contradictions in hadron spectroscopy. In 1965 Nambu and Han introduced the octet of gluons. In 1972, Gell-Mann and Fritzsch, coined the term quantum chromodynamics as the gauge theory of the strong interaction. In particular, they employed the general field theory developed in the 1950s by Yang and Mills, in which the carrier particles of a force can themselves radiate further carrier particles. (This is different from QED, where the photons that carry the electromagnetic force do not radiate further photons.) First, QED Lagrangian… µ ! # 1 µν LQED = ψeiγ "∂µ +ieAµ $ψe − meψeψe − Fµν F 4 µν µ ν ν µ Einstein notation: • F =∂ A −∂ A EM field tensor when an index variable µ • A four potential of the photon field appears twice in a single term, it implies summation µ •γ Dirac 4x4 matrices of that term over all the values of the index
    [Show full text]
  • Omega Baryon Production As a Function of Multiplicity in Proton-Proton Collisions √ at S = 13 Tev
    Omega Baryon Production as a Function of Multiplicity in Proton-Proton Collisions p at s = 13 TeV Master's Thesis by Lisa Vergara Supervised by David Silvermyr & Peter Christiansen August 13, 2019 Department of Physics Division of Particle Physics Abstract In this thesis the production of the Ω− and Ω+ baryons, in proton-proton collisions at p s = 13 TeV, is analyzed as a function of charged-particle multiplicity. The events analyzed were recorded by the ALICE detector, at the LHC. The aim of the analysis is to study the QGP-signature of strangeness enhancement, in search for an enhancement of Ω− and Ω+ at high multiplicity collisions. The Ω− (Ω+) baryon is optimal for this study as it is a multi-strange baryon consisting of three strange (anti-strange) quarks. The analyzed events are separated according to their event multiplicity and the baryon candidates are reconstructed through the cascade decay topology, and identified through several selection criteria. The results show that there is a clear enhancement of Ω− and Ω+ production, compared to the charged-particle multiplicity, at high multiplicity events. Popul¨arvetenskaplig Sammanfattning Som m˚angakanske vet, ¨arallting runtomkring oss (och ¨aven vi sj¨alva) uppbyggda av atomer. Atomer ¨ardock inte de minsta byggstenarna som finns (se bild1), d˚ade best˚ar av en k¨arna{ som best˚arav protoner och neutroner { och elektroner. Aven¨ proton- erna och neutronerna best˚arav partiklar, s˚akallade kvarkar, men d¨artar det stopp. De h¨arkvarkarna (och ¨aven elektronerna) ¨arvad som kallas elementarpartiklar och de best˚arinte av andra partiklar { s˚avitt vi vet i alla fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacuum$Polariza1on$In$QED$ Force$Between$Two$Electrons$ (In$Natural$Units)$ +! P E = 4⇡↵ -!
    Vacuum$polariza1on$in$QED$ force$between$two$electrons$ (in$natural$units)$ +! p e = 4⇡↵ -! +! -! +! -! +! -! +! The$interac1on$strength$of$the$two$electrons$gets$stronger$as$the$distance$between$ them$becomes$smaller$ Electric charge is screened; interaction becomes weak at large distances Vacuum$polariza1on$in$QCD$ The left diagram is shared by QED and QCD which renders the interaction stronger at shorter distance (screening). The second diagram arising from the nonlinear interaction between gluons in QCD has the antiscreening effect, which makes the coupling weaker at short distance. • Color$is$an1Mscreened$ • Color$builds$up$away$from$a$source$ • Interac1on$becomes$strong$at$large$distances$(low$ momenta)$ • Confinement$of$quarks;$quarks$are$not$observed$as$ isolated$par1cles$ g2 Strong coupling constant α = s 4π In quantum field theory, the coupling constant is an effec1ve constant, which depends on four-momentum Q2 transferred. For strong interac1ons, the Q2 dependence is very strong (gluons - as the field quanta - carry color and they can couple to other gluons). a first- order perturbave QCD calculaon (valid at very large Q2) gives: 2 12π running coupling α Q = s ( ) 2 2 constant! (22 − 2n f )⋅ ln(Q / ΛQCD ) nf =6 − number of quark flavors ΛQCD − a parameter in QCD (~0.22 GeV), an infrared cutoff The spaal separaon between quarks goes as " ! = Q2 Therefore, for very small distances and high values of Q2, the inter-quark coupling decreases, vanishing asympto1cally. In the limit of very large Q2, quarks can be considered to be “free” (asympto1c freedom). On the other hand, at large distances, the inter-quark coupling increases so it is impossible to detach individual quarks from hadrons (confinement).
    [Show full text]