• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Newly observed Ω(2012) state and strong decays of the low-lying Ω excitations 1 1,2,3 1,2,3 4,5 1,2,3 Zuo-Yun Wang , Long-Cheng Gui ,∗ Qi-Fang L¨u ,† Li-Ye Xiao , and Xian-Hui Zhong ‡ 1) Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, 2) Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Changsha 410081, China 3) Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications(SICQEA), Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081,China 4) Center of High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China and 5) School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Stimulated by the newly discovered Ω(2012) resonance at Belle II, in this work we have studied the OZI 3 allowed strong decays of the low-lying 1P- and 1D-wave Ω baryons within the P0 model. It is found that P Ω(2012) is most likely to be a 1P-wave Ω state with J = 3/2−. We also find that the Ω(2250) state could be assigned as a 1D-wave state with JP = 5/2+. The other missing 1P- and 1D-wave Ω baryons may have large potentials to be observed in their main decay channels. PACS numbers: I. INTRODUCTION be completely ruled out. Furthermore, the mass and strong decay patten of Ω(2012) also were studied by QCD sum Ξ The study of hadron spectrum is an important way for us rule [18, 19]. As its mass is very close to (1530)K thresh- P = to understand strong interactions. For the baryon spectra, old, there is also some work considered it as a J 3/2− KΞ∗ molecular state [20–22], or a dynamically generated state the classification based on SU(3) f flavor symmetry has been achieved a great success. The Ω hyperon as a member of [23]. In Ref. [24], by a flavor SU(3) analysis the authors sug- Ω baryon decuplet in the quark model was unambiguously dis- gested (2012)to be a numberof 3/2− decuplet baryon if the Ω Ξ ¯ Ω covered in both production and decay at BNL about one half sum of branching ratios for the decay (2012) Kπ, −ππ 6 → century ago [1]. More excited Ω baryons should exist as well is not too large ( 70%). Ω according to SU(6) O(3) symmetry. In theory, the mass In present work, to further reveal the nature of (2012) and Ω spectrum of Ω hyperon× has been predicted within many mod- better understand the properties of the excited states, we els, such as the Skyrme model [2], various constituent quark study the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka(OZI)allowed two-body strong models [3–12], the lattice gauge theory [13, 14], and so on. decays of the 1P-and 1D-wave baryons with the widely used 3 However, in experiments there are only a few information of P0 model. The quark model classification for the 1P- and Ω the excited Ω baryons. In the review of particle physics from 1D-wave baryons and their theoretical masses are listed Ω the Particle Data Group (PDG), except for the ground state in Table I. The spatial wave functions for the baryons are Ω(1672), only three possible excited Ω baryons are listed: described by harmonic oscillators. According to our calcu- Ω Ω(2250), Ω(2380), and Ω(2470) [15]. Their nature is still lations, we find that (i) the newly observed (2012) reso- Ω rather uncertain with three- or two-star ratings. Fortunately, nance is most likely to be the 1P-wave state with spin- P = the Belle II experimentsoffer a great opportunityfor our study parity J 3/2− and the experimental data can be reason- P = of the Ω spectrum. ably described. The other 1P-wave state with J 1/2− Ω Ω might be broader state with a width of dozens of MeV. The Very recently, a candidate of excited baryon, (2012), 3 was observed by the Belle II collaboration[16]. The measured P0 results are consistent with the recent predictions of the Ω mass and width are chiral quark model [17]. (ii) The (2250) resonance listed in PDG may be a good candidate of the JP = 5/2+ 1D wave 4 + 2 + M = 2012.4 0.7(stat) 0.6(syst) MeV, state 56, 10, 2, 2, 5/2 or 70, 10, 2, 2, 5/2 . Although the arXiv:1810.08318v2 [hep-ph] 23 Oct 2018 ± ± widths| of the D-wave statesi | predicted withini the 3P model Γ = +2.5 0 6.4 2.0(stat) 1.6(syst) MeV, − ± are systematically larger that those predicted with the chiral quark model [17], these states may be observed in their main respectively. In various quark models [3–12], the masses of decay channels in future experiments for their relatively nar- Ω the first orbital (1P) excitations of states are predicted to row width. Ω be 2.0 GeV. The newly observed state (2012) may be a This paper is organized as follows. Firstly, We give a brief ∼ Ω good candidate of the 1P-wave state. Recently, to study the review of the 3P model in Sec. II. Secondly, we present Ω 0 possible interpretation of (2012), its strong decays were cal- the numerical results of strong decay of 1P- and 1D-wave Ω culated with the chiral quark model [17], where it was shown P baryon in Sec. III. Finally, a summary of our results is given that Ω(2012) could be assigned to the spin-parity J = 3/2− P in Sec. IV. 1P-wave state. However, the spin-parity J = 1/2− state can’t 3 II. THE P0 MODEL Electronic address: [email protected] ∗ 3 †Electronic address: [email protected] The P0 model, is also called the quark pair creation ‡Electronic address: [email protected] (QPC) model. It was first proposed by Micu [25], Car- 2 TABLE I: The theory predicted masses (MeV) and spin-flavor-space wave-functions of Ω baryons under SU(6) quark model classification 2S +1 P are listed below. We denote the baryon states as N6, N3, N, L, J where N6 stands for the irreducible representation of spin-flavor SU(6) | i P group, N3 stands for the irreducible representation of flavor SU(3) group and N, L, J as principal quantum number, total orbital angular momentum and spin-parity, respectively[17]. The φ,χ,ψ denote flavor, spin and spatial wave function, respectively. The Clebsch-Gorden coefficients of spin-orbital coupling have been omitted. Theory States Wave function [4] [3] [2] [7] [13] 4 + s s s 1S 56, 10, 0, 0, 3/2 φ χ ψ000 1678 1635 1694 1675 1642(17) 2 E 1 s ρ ρ s λ λ 1P 70, 10, 1, 1, 1/2− φ χ ψ + φ χ ψ 1941 1950 1837 2020 1944(56) √2 11Lz 11Lz 2 E 1 s ρ ρ s λ λ 70, 10, 1, 1, 3/2− φ χ ψ + φ χ ψ 2038 2000 1978 2020 2049(32) √2 11Lz 11Lz + 1D 56,4 10, 2, 2, 1/2 E φsχsψs 2301 2255 2140 2210 2350(63)/2481(51) 22Lz 56,4 10, 2, 2, 3/2+E φsχsψs 2173/2304 2280 2282 2215 22Lz 2470(49) 70,2 10, 2, 2, 3/2+E 1 φsχρψρ + φsχλψλ 2173/2304 2345 2282 2265 √2 22Lz 22Lz + 56,4 10, 2, 2, 5/2 E φsχsψs 2401 2280 2225 22Lz ··· 70,2 10, 2, 2, 5/2+E 1 φsχρψρ + φsχλψλ 2401 2345 2265 √2 22Lz 22Lz + ··· 56,4 10, 2, 2, 7/2 E φsχsψs 2332 2295 2210 22Lz ··· E litz and Kislinger [26], and developed by the Orsay group and Yaouanc et al [27–32]. In the model, it assumes that PC + a pair of quarks qq¯ is created from the vacuum with J = 2S B 1 B(n LB(J M ))(P~ B) 0++(2S +1L = 3P ) when the initial hadron A decays, and the B B JB J 0 E quarks from the hadron A regroups with the created quarks = 2EB LBML ; S BMS JBMJ h B B | B i form two daughter hadrons B and C. For baryon decays, two p MLXB MS B quarks of the initial baryon regroups with the created quark to 3 3 3 3 form a daughter baryon, and the remaining one quark regroup δ (~p1 + ~p2 + ~p4 P~ B)d ~p1d ~p2d ~p4 × − with the created antiquark to form a meson. The process of Z Ψ 124 124 124 nB LB ML (~p1, ~p2, ~p4)χ ϕ ω baryon decays is shown in Fig. 1. B S B MS B B B 3 × The transition operator under the P0 model is written as q (~p )q (~p )q (~p ) , (3) × 1 1 2 2 4 4 T = 3γ 1m;1 m 00 d3 ~p d3 ~p δ3(~p + ~p ) − h − | i 4 5 4 5 Xm Z + C(n2S C 1L )(P~ ) m ~p4 ~p5 45 45 45 C C(JC ,MJC ) C 1 ( − )χ1, mϕ0 ω0 b4†i(~p4)d5†j(~p5), (1) ×Y 2 − E = 2EC LC ML ; S C MS JC MJ h C C | C i where the pair-strength γ is a dimensionless parameter, i and j p MLXC ,MSC are the color indices of the created quark q and antiquarkq ¯ . 4 5 3 + ~ 3 3 ϕ45 = uu+ dd¯+ ss / √ ω45 = δ δ (~p3 ~p5 PC)d ~p3d ~p5 0 ( ¯ ¯) 3 and 0 i j stand for the flavor and × Z − 45 color singlet, respectively.

Load more

  8

Copy Link