DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Sociology the Period of Crisis, Critique and Changes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Sociology the Period of Crisis, Critique and Changes RUSSIAN SOCIETY OF SOCIOLOGISTS RUSSIAN SOCIOLOGY THE PERIOD OF CRISIS, CRITIQUE AND CHANGES: Papers of Russian Sociologists for the 11th ESA Conference CRISIS, CRITIQUE AND CHANGES in Torino Italy, August 28-31, 2013 Editor-in-Chief V.Mansurov Moscow – Torino 2013 1 Abakarov, Dmitry K., Bryansk Social-innovative bases of civil servants' professionalism development management Problem context. Relevance of a subject of article in its fundamental basis is defined by the problem of traditional institute of public administration ability structurally to answer calls of difficult being transformed modern society. In the solution of this problem in recent years among scientists and practicians of social management the increasing attention to a question of quality of public service is shown. However, despite carried out in Russia within nearly two decades administrative reforms and reforms of public service, a problem remains not solvedyet. In search of the reasons of not success of these reforms the scientific direction in which the question of insufficiency of their orientation mainly on structurally functional changes of systems and state governing bodies is accented is allocated. Thus in the center of attention of researchers increasing value of a human factor, both in genesis of problems of a living arrangement, and in the course of their purposeful decision is defined. Scientific work in this direction becomes complicated that, according to a number of authors, now social sciences endure an era of change of paradigms. The classical paradigm of public administration was created during an era of domination of mechanistic ideas of the device of public life and, respectively, management of this life. Now the nonclassical and post- nonclassical representations putting theory and methodological bases of management of difficult social transformations come to change by it, being characterized unexpectedness of manifestations, nonlinearity of processes, ambiguity of consequences. In this context the imperative of new quality of social management professionals formation at all its structurally functional levels is defined. The modern institute of public service with its functions of direct activity connection of public authorities with citizens, their communities and the organizations especially needs the professionals, capable to solve complex problems of public administration. Now there is a number of the directions in scientific studying of professionalism of civil servants. However, despite their general orientation to the solution of problems of human resource management, research are conducted it is separate, from positions of subject domains of economy, political science, psychology and pedagogic and other sciences. Thus the attraction fact in methodology of professionalism of foreign experience which, first, mainly belongs to the solution of problems of the management which provisions it isn't always corresponded to subject domain of the theory 3 and practice of public administration attracts attention, secondly, itself plunges into crisis in connection with accruing complexity of objects of administrative influence. Scientific providing the solution of these basic problems of high-quality modernization of the personnel case of public service needs focusing of researches of statesmen' professionalism from a position of evolutionary interpretation of its nature and openness to innovatively being transformed environment of social management. Degree of a scientific readiness of a problem. Features of the analyzed problem lying on crossing of different knowledge, define various approaches of identification of degree of a readiness of this subject. These approaches can be grouped in some semantic blocks. The first group was made by works of scientists in the field of the general sociology and sociology of social changes which make a basic context of article. Conceptual bases of scientific research of the present stage of social dynamics and acceleration of social changes are put in scientific works of such scientists, as R. Boudon, A. Giddens, M. Castells, N.N. Moiseyev, R.A. Nisbet, T. Parsons, P.A. Sorokin, A. Toffler, P. Sztompka. The second group of works is made by works of experts in sociology of professions and professional groups. In this group works of representatives western classical (É. Durkheim, T. Parsons etc.) and more modern sociology (P.L. Berger, T. Luckmann, P. Bourdieu, R. Dingwall, M.S. Larsson, E. Freidson, A. Abbott), and also modern domestic researchers (R.N. Abramov, I.P. Popova, P.V. Romanov, E.Ya. Yarskaya-Smirnova), the defining theoretical and methodological bases of various sociological approaches to research of regularities of professional socialization are allocated. It is necessary to notice that this direction was formed under essential influence of views and scientific provisions of the classic of sociology of M. Weber. The third group of works was made by works on studying of essence of professionalism and professionalizing of the civil service of V.K. Belolipetskiy, V.E. Boykov, A.A. Derkach, V.G. Zazykin, V.G. Ignatov, E.A. Klimov, A.K. Markova, A.S. Ognev, A.V. Ponedelkov, A.M.Starostin, A.I. Turchinov, etc. The fourth group is made by the works devoted to a perspective of work with the personnel of public service and management of its professional development. Here we will call T.P. Galkina, L.A. Kalinichenko, K.O. Magomedov, S.I. Samygin, N. S. Sleptsov, V.A.Sologub, A.I. Turchinov, V.N. Shevelev, V.V. Shcherbina etc. The specified authors pay attention to research social the practician of professional selection of shots, their motivations, an assessment, training and promotion. 4 The fifth group of works opens value of innovative processes in social development and social management, these questions were investigated by S.Yu. Glazyev, Yu.A. Karpova, V.S. Karpichev, L.Ya. Kosals, N.I. Lapin, V.L. Romanov, B.F. Usmanov, which made an essential contribution to definition of essence of innovations, innovative activity and innovative process, and also in formation of some approaches to determination of efficiency of introduction of innovations. The sixth group of works treats development of interdisciplinary approaches in public administration and preparations of public service professionals from positions of social synergetrics (V.G. Budanov, L.A. Vasilenko, V.S. Karpichev, E.N. Knyazeva, S.P. Kurdyumov, G.G. Malinetsky, I.E. Moskalev, V.L. Romanov). Despite so volume and versatile scientific contribution to research of problems of professionalism, it is necessary to recognize that the complex sociological analysis of problems of civil servants professionalism and justification of model of its modernization now is necessary, as defined a choice of a subject of article. The object of the research is the professionalism of civil servants. The subject of the research are social-innovative bases of civil servants' professionalism progress management in the conditions of social changes of the environment of professional activity. The aim of the article is: to suggest the algorithm of civil servants' professionalism development management in the conditions of transformation of modern Russian society. The main objectives are: 1 . To analyse methodological approaches to professionalism research as basic category in management science. 2 . To prove value of professional competence of structure of civil servants' professionalism in changing society. 3 . To characterize management of development of civil servants' professionalism as function of institute of public service. 4 . To reveal the main directions and methodical aspect of social and innovative orientation of civil servants'professionalism. 5 . To give the comparative characteristic of strategic value of real and social-innovative models of development of civil servants' professionalism and to open their value in social management. 6 . To explain the algorithm of management of processes of innovative formation and development of civil servants'professionalism. 5 Theoretical and methodological basis of research is focused on the integrated theory of sociocultural dynamics of P.A. Sorokin which formed the fundamental basis for the analysis of evolution of scientific representations and knowledge of essence of professionalism and its value in the course of public administration in the conditions of difficult transformations of modern society. The theoretical bases were works of school of sciences of the State personnel policy and the human resource management, developed by scientists of the Chair of public service and personnel policy of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), and also works of researchers in the field of the general sociology, sociology of management, sociology of public service, sociology of professions and professional groups, sociology of social changes, and also the theory of social self-organization. As special sociological methods the comparative analysis, generalization, method of expert evaluations, the analysis of normative documents, modeling of social processes were used. Regulatory legal base of research made legislative and regulations of the Russian Federation: Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal laws of the Russian Federation; decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation; provisions and the conclusions containing in interviews, reports and speeches of heads of the Russian state on problems of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 44 Leila Almazova Teaching Religion to Children in Contemporary
    Leila Almazova Teaching Religion to Children in Contemporary Tatarstan: The Case of Islam DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2311-3448-2018-5-2-44-62 Leila Almazova — Department of Oriental, African and Islamic Stud- ies, Institute of International Relations, History and Oriental Stud- ies, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (Russia). leila_almazova @mail.ru This article is devoted to the problem of children’s instruction on Islam in the Republic of Tatarstan. Research is based on fieldwork in several rural districts and six cities carried out in June and July 2017, as well as on the analysis of curricula, textbooks, and publications on religious educational reforms. The study shows that the main factor in how re- ligion is taught in public schools is the multiethnic and multireligious composition of the population (54 and 44 percent of Tatar and Russian populations respectively). Of the six available modules for the study of religion and ethics, only two are taught in Tatarstan — Foundations of World Religious Cultures and Foundations of Secular Ethics. The remaining four — Orthodox, Islamic, Judaic and Buddhist Cultures — although widely taught in other Russian regions — are not utilized in the state schools of Tatarstan. This lack of religious instruction in pub- lic schools determines the intensity of children’s intrareligious educa- tion. The case of Islam shows the diversity of forms of children’s reli- gious education: religion is taught in Muslim kindergartens, in special courses that operate near mosques, in summer camps, discussions and meetings with imams and Islamic clergy at schools, regular courses of Islamic ethics taught by imams at schools, and at Uthmaniya, the private general-education school founded in Kazan by the Tatarstan Muslim Religious Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Narcotrafficking: a Joint Threat Assessment
    POLICY REPORT 2013—1 Copyright © 2013 EastWest Institute ISBN: 978-0-9856824-1-5 On the cover: A scarecrow stands tall in a poppy field in northern Afghanistan. Photos: Reporters.be/AP The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the EastWest Institute, its board of directors or its staff. The EastWest Institute is an international, non-partisan, not-for-profit policy organization focused on confronting critical challenges that endanger peace. EWI was established in 1980 as a catalyst to build trust, develop leadership, and promote collaboration for positive change. The institute has offices in New York, Brussels, Moscow and Washington. For more information about the EastWest Institute or this paper, please contact: The EastWest Institute 11 East 26th Street, 20th Floor New York, NY 10010 U.S.A. 1-212-824-4100 [email protected] www.ewi.info AFGHAN NARCOTRAFFICKING A JOINT THREAT ASSESSMENT JOINT U.S. - RUSSIA WORKING GROUP ON AFGHAN NARCOTRAFFICKING APRIL 2013 PRINCIPAL AUTHOR: Ekaterina Stepanova EDITOR: Jacqueline McLaren Miller CONTRIBUTORS: Ilnur Batyrshin, Head of the Scientific Research Center, Russian Federal Drug Control Service (FSKN) George Gavrilis, Executive Director, The Hollings Center for International Dialogue Viktor Korgun, Head of the Afghanistan Department, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences John “Jack” Lawn, former Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration David Mansfield, Independent Consultant Gretchen Peters, author,
    [Show full text]
  • The Siloviki in Russian Politics
    The Siloviki in Russian Politics Andrei Soldatov and Michael Rochlitz Who holds power and makes political decisions in contemporary Russia? A brief survey of available literature in any well-stocked bookshop in the US or Europe will quickly lead one to the answer: Putin and the “siloviki” (see e.g. LeVine 2009; Soldatov and Borogan 2010; Harding 2011; Felshtinsky and Pribylovsky 2012; Lucas 2012, 2014 or Dawisha 2014). Sila in Russian means force, and the siloviki are the members of Russia’s so called “force ministries”—those state agencies that are authorized to use violence to respond to threats to national security. These armed agents are often portrayed—by journalists and scholars alike—as Russia’s true rulers. A conventional wisdom has emerged about their rise to dominance, which goes roughly as follows. After taking office in 2000, Putin reconsolidated the security services and then gradually placed his former associates from the KGB and FSB in key positions across the country (Petrov 2002; Kryshtanovskaya and White 2003, 2009). Over the years, this group managed to disable almost all competing sources of power and control. United by a common identity, a shared worldview, and a deep personal loyalty to Putin, the siloviki constitute a cohesive corporation, which has entrenched itself at the heart of Russian politics. Accountable to no one but the president himself, they are the driving force behind increasingly authoritarian policies at home (Illarionov 2009; Roxburgh 2013; Kasparov 2015), an aggressive foreign policy (Lucas 2014), and high levels of state predation and corruption (Dawisha 2014). While this interpretation contains elements of truth, we argue that it provides only a partial and sometimes misleading and exaggerated picture of the siloviki’s actual role.
    [Show full text]
  • The Siloviki in Putin's Russia
    Ian Bremmer and Samuel Charap The Siloviki in Putin’s Russia: Who They Are and What They Want The July 2006 meeting of the Group of Eight (G-8) major indus- trialized nations in St. Petersburg focused the attention of the international media on Russia. On issues ranging from Middle East conflict to energy se- curity, President Vladimir Putin sought to demonstrate that his increasingly self-confident government has earned its seat at the G-8 table. Coverage of the summit focused squarely on Putin—his international priorities, control over domestic politics, personal relationships with other heads of state, and leadership style. These stories created the impression that Putin is Russian politics, reinforcing the view that to understand Putin himself is to under- stand Kremlin policy. Since Putin was named acting president on December 31, 1999, ana- lysts have poured over his personal history, public statements, and writings, confidently forecasting political and economic trends based largely on their interpretations of what they found. Those who portray him as an autocrat underline his KGB background. Others point to his tutelage under former St. Petersburg mayor and liberal reformer Anatoly Sobchak or his preference for pragmatism over ideology. Recently, Western scholars unearthed his doc- toral thesis and used it to explain Russian state involvement in the energy sector.1 President George W. Bush famously contributed to this line of analysis by implying in 2001 that his “sense of the man’s soul” provided a reliable foun- dation for U.S.-Russian relations. Despite its parsimony and popularity, this approach to understanding Kremlin policy, which some have called “Putinol- ogy,” creates a misleading impression of how Russia is ruled.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Tatneft Company
    LOOKING INTO THE FUTURE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TATNEFT COMPANY ABOUT OPERATIONS CORPORATE FINANCIAL SOCIAL INDUSTRIAL SAFETY & PJSC TATNEFT, ANNUAL REPORT 2015 THE COMPANY MANAGEMENT RESULTS RESPONSIBILITY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY CONTENTS ABOUT THE COMPANY 01 Joint Address to Shareholders, Investors and Partners .......................................................................................................... 02 The Company’s Mission ....................................................................................................................................................... 04 Equity Holding Structure of PJSC TATNEFT ........................................................................................................................... 06 Development and Continuity of the Company’s Strategic Initiatives.......................................................................................... 09 Business Model ................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Finanical Position and Strengthening the Assets Structure ...................................................................................................... 12 Major Industrial Factors Affecting the Company’s Activity in 2015 ............................................................................................ 18 Model of Sustainable Development of the Company ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treisman Silovarchs 9 10 06
    Putin’s Silovarchs Daniel Treisman October 2006, Forthcoming in Orbis, Winter 2007 In the late 1990s, many Russians believed their government had been captured by a small group of business magnates known as “the oligarchs”. The most flamboyant, Boris Berezovsky, claimed in 1996 that seven bankers controlled fifty percent of the Russian economy. Having acquired massive oil and metals enterprises in rigged privatizations, these tycoons exploited Yeltsin’s ill-health to meddle in politics and lobby their interests. Two served briefly in government. Another, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, summed up the conventional wisdom of the time in a 1997 interview: “Politics is the most lucrative field of business in Russia. And it will be that way forever.”1 A decade later, most of the original oligarchs have been tripping over each other in their haste to leave the political stage, jettisoning properties as they go. From exile in London, Berezovsky announced in February he was liquidating his last Russian assets. A 1 Quoted in Andrei Piontkovsky, “Modern-Day Rasputin,” The Moscow Times, 12 November, 1997. fellow media magnate, Vladimir Gusinsky, long ago surrendered his television station to the state-controlled gas company Gazprom and now divides his time between Israel and the US. Khodorkovsky is in a Siberian jail, serving an eight-year sentence for fraud and tax evasion. Roman Abramovich, Berezovsky’s former partner, spends much of his time in London, where he bought the Chelsea soccer club in 2003. Rather than exile him to Siberia, the Kremlin merely insists he serve as governor of the depressed Arctic outpost of Chukotka—a sign Russia’s leaders have a sense of humor, albeit of a dark kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation 2012
    RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2012 Short-term prognosis RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2012 Short-term prognosis Editors: Karmo Tüür & Viacheslav Morozov Editors: Karmo Tüür & Viacheslav Morozov Editor of “Politica” series: Rein Toomla Copyright: Individual authors, 2012 ISSN 1736–9312 Tartu University Press www.tyk.ee CONTENT Introduction ..................................................................................... 7 Evaluation of the last prognosis. Erik Terk ...................................... 9 INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS Political system. Viacheslav Morozov .............................................. 21 Legal system. Aleksey Kartsov .......................................................... 26 Economy. Raivo Vare ...................................................................... 30 Energy sector. Andres Mäe .............................................................. 35 The Russian Military. Kaarel Kaas ................................................. 40 The political role of the Russian Orthodox Church. Alar Kilp ...... 45 Mass media development. Olga Chepurnaya ................................. 49 Civil society. Zhanna Chernova ...................................................... 54 Demography of the regions. Aimar Altosaar ................................... 58 Nationalities policy of Russia. Konstantin Zamyatin ...................... 62 Center – Northern Caucasus. Nona Shahnazarian ....................... 67 Foreign relations of Russian regions. Eero Mikenberg .................... 71 EXTERNAL RELATIONS Russia and the WTO. Kristjan
    [Show full text]
  • Short Remarks About Certain Structural Problems Of
    NIKOLAY MITROKHIN. SHORT REMARKS ABOUT CERTAIN STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS... 211 HORT REMARKS ABOUT CERTAIN S STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS OF CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN SOCIOLOGY Nikolay Mitrokhin © Laboratorium. 1: 211–215 2009. No. © 1. Michael Burawoy distinguishes between professional, critical, policy, and public sociology, based on the main tasks and publics of sociological knowledge. Is this typology helpful in understanding the current state of Russian sociology? How are these four types correlated in Russia? I concur with the South African sociologists whom Michael Burawoy cites as disagreeing with him. The South African and US models are not really contradictory. Sociology is a public science which, like any science, is based on a critical assessment of data. There is no doubt that it exerts an influence on society, but it must be practiced by professionals. Amateurism in science is a possibility, but it senselessly squanders public and individual capital. The social sciences can, of course, be used to change society, and it would be odd to argue that they (and, in particular, sociology) are not intended to do so by the very fact of their existence. The social sciences are inherently critical, and the subjects of their research may be more or less sensitive to critique. The existence of policy-oriented social studies is equally indisputable. Yet for broad reaches of social research, the definitions given are vague. A study on the distribution of refrigerators among a certain social group may be of interest to a company that manufactures refrigerators as well as to people who attempt to describe that group as a social phenomenon, past or present.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Migration and Integration Final.Pdf
    LABOR MIGRATION AND MIGRANT INTEGRATION POLICY IN GERMANY AND RUSSIA Edited by Marya S. Rozanova SAINT PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY Copyright © 2016 by Saint Petersburg State University; Print House “Scythia-Print;” Center for Civil, Social, Scientifc, and Cultural Initiatives “STRATEGIA” Recommended for publication and published by Saint Petersburg State University Center for Civil, Social, Scientifc, and 1/3 Smolnii Street, entrance 7 Cultural Initiatives “STRATEGIA” Saint Petersburg 191124 22-24 7th Krasnoarmeiskaya Street Russia Saint Petersburg 190005 Russia All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or uti- lized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafer invented, including photocopying, microflming, and recording, or in any information stor- age or retrieval system, without the prior permission from the publisher, except by a review- er who may quote passages in a review. Saint Petersburg State University; the Center for Civil, Social, Scientifc, and Cultural Initiatives “STRATEGIA;” and the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Russia do not take in- stitutional positions on public policy issues; the views and recommendations presented in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of these organizations, their staf, or trustees. Labor migration and migrant integration policy in Germany and Russia / edited by Marya S. Rozanova. p. cm. Copyeditor and Proofreader: Larissa Galenes Primary Proofreader: Herbert Horn ISBN 978-5-98620-209-9 Typeset and printed on acid-free paper by Te Print House “Scythia-Print” 10 Bolshaya Pushkarskaya Street Saint Petersburg 197198 Russia Contents Acknowledgements vii Introduction: Migration Policy in Russia and Germany: Challenges and Perspectives (Conference Overview) 1 Marya S.
    [Show full text]
  • Serendipities Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences
    Serendipities Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences Volume 3, No 1 (2018) Table of Content: Articles Antoni Sułek: The Polish Career of The American Soldier: From the Model to the Legend 1-13 Raf Vanderstraeten, Joshua Eykens: Communalism and Internationalism: Publication norms and structures in international social science 14-28 Forum Andrew Abbott: Interview: On Being the Editor of AJS 29-41 Book Reviews (Post-) Soviet Sociologies reviewed by Agata Zysiak 42-47 Rindzevičiūtė: The Power of Systems reviewed by Christian Daye 48-51 Hess: Tocqueville and Beaumont reviewed by Eva Stina Lyon 52-53 Durkheim and Hubert in Brazil reviewed by João Maia 54-57 Heufelder: Argentinischer Krösus reviewed by Christian Fleck 58-62 Normal Science? reviewed by Andreas Hess 63-65 Editors Peter Baehr (Lingnan University, Hong Kong), Fernanda Beigel (Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina), Christian Fleck (University of Graz, Austria), Andreas Hess (University College Dublin, Ireland), Laurent Jeanpierre (Université Paris 8, Vincennes-Saint-Denis, France) Olessia Kirtchik (National Research University, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia) Thomas Koenig (Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria) George Steinmetz (University of Michigan, USA) Managing Editors Matthias Duller (University of Graz, Austria) Carl Neumayr (University of Graz, Austria) Associate editors Ivan Boldyrev (Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands) Thibaud Boncourt (Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, France) Matteo Bortolini (University
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Method for Generating Subject Area Associative Portraits: Different Examples
    288 Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence | ICAI'15 | Method for Generating Subject Area Associative Portraits: Different Examples I. Galina1, M. Charnine1, N. Somin1, V. Nikolaev1, Yu. Morozova1, O. Zolotarev2 1Institute of Informatics Problems, Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2Russian New University, Moscow, Russia Tatarstan". Information sources for this topic are: official Abstract - For the last several years a group of scientists has websites of state institutions, political parties; national and been working on creation of a knowledge extraction system regional media; social network Vkontakte, Twitter based on the automated generation of subject area associative microblogging, etc.); "Monitoring of public opinion in the portraits (SAAP) and on the construction of semantic context socio-political sphere", tapering to a training sample "Protest spaces (SCS) [1-11]. The ideology of the SAAP is based on activity"; and AUV (Autonomous underwater vehicles") in the distributional hypothesis, stating that semantically similar Russian and English languages; "Computer Science" (in (or related) lexemes have similar context and, conversely, English), etc. similar context has similar lexemes. In the applied model we use an extended hypothesis, that includes not only the study of On these topics we found and processed from ten thousand to similarities and differences in the contexts of individual one and a half million documents in Russian and English lexemes, but also arbitrary multiple lexemes fragments languages, a total of about 160 GB. For example, on the SA (significant phrases - SP) too. of "Socio-political portrait of Tatarstan" formed the texts Keywords: Subject Area, Associative Portraits, keywords digest of about 20 GB, and on the subject of "Protest activity" extracting, significant phrases, thesaurus, Big Data there was found over 28 GB of test information.
    [Show full text]