DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding the Role of Economic, Cultural, and Social Capital and Habitus in Student College Choice: an Investigation of Student, Family, and School Contexts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding the Role of Economic, Cultural, and Social Capital and Habitus in Student College Choice: an Investigation of Student, Family, and School Contexts Understanding the Role of Economic, Cultural, and Social Capital and Habitus in Student College Choice: An Investigation of Student, Family, and School Contexts by Eunjong Ra A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Higher Education) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Stephen L. DesJardins, Chair Professor Brian P. McCall Professor Edward P. St. John Professor Alford A. Young, Jr. © Eunjong Ra 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is a pleasure to express my gratitude to all who have given me their kind help and support during my work on this dissertation. My first thanks go to the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) of the Korean government and the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. Without their generous scholarships, I could never even have set out on this journey. I also greatly appreciate many members of the CSHPE community for their support in this process. My deepest gratitude goes to each of my committee members. I have been privileged to work with Professor Steve DesJardins, who has been my academic advisor, supervisor, and dissertation chair. Even before I started to write this dissertation, he always listened to my concerns and answered my questions, and he has been a truly supportive mentor, who extended a hand whenever I found myself crossing dark valleys. During the dissertation process, he offered extraordinarily helpful and considerate feedback on my study. I appreciate his advice, which greatly improved my study after I incorporated it. I also feel very fortunate to have worked with Professor Brian McCall, whose strong skills and knowledge of statistics have offered me invaluable help in maximizing the quality of this work. In addition, I am grateful to have Professor Ed St. John as my committee member. Having him on my committee enabled me to seriously learn theory. I appreciate the enthusiasm and patience he showed when he observed my progress on this work. Finally, I very much appreciate the opportunity to work with Professor Alford Young, Jr., whose extensive knowledge of sociological theories have offered me great help in thinking critically about and applying sociological constructs. I cannot imagine having completed this work without these four respectable committee members. I must also acknowledge my cohort members in CSHPE. Karen Moronski- Chapman has helped me from my first year; when I hesitated to do something because of ii my lack of comfort in this different cultural environment, she always encouraged me and provided sincere and genuine advice. Her invitations to her home in Buffalo, along with occasional visits to her home in Ann Arbor, have offered me unique opportunities to learn about this country and its people. As they promised, when she and her husband, Bill Chapman, travel to Korea, I would like to provide the same warmhearted welcome that they gave me. I feel grateful for my friendships with Julie Posselt and Matt Holsapple while we were working on our CQE and other milestones. When we regularly met in the ERC and talked about our concerns, I felt my stress about the CQE reduce. I am also thankful for those who helped me with my CQE and in the bridging stage between the CQE and dissertation, including Professor Michael Bastedo, Professor Jan Lawrence, Johanna Masse, Lijing Yang, Jiyun Kim, Carmen McCallum, Peter Bacevice, and Pelema Morrice. I also appreciate the help of Rosie Perez, Kerri Wakefield, Ozan Jaquette, Jeongeun Kim, Rob Bielby, Brian Burt, Ethan Stephenson, Melinda Richardson, Linda Rayle, and Joan McCoy. All of these people have demonstrated how supportive the community here at CSHPE is. Apart from CSHPE, I should acknowledge the help of CRLT Director Cindy Finelli. Beyond financial support, she has been such a considerate and nice supervisor who always says thank-you for the work I do. Various work experiences with her also helped me broaden my perspectives. I have been impressed by the generous help of those people whom I have never met. Mr. John Wirt from the National Center for Education Statistics has provided me with technical assistance on the data used for this study, and Professor Patrick Royston from MRC Clinical Trials Unit in London has kindly responded to all of my emailed questions regarding the multiple imputation of missing values with ICE. In addition to these people, I would like to acknowledge Brady West and Lingling Zhang at the Center for Statistical Consultation and Research (CSCAR) for their patience and assistance regarding statistical issues. Although there is much room for improvement, my writing iii has greatly improved with the help of many people, especially Ruth Mendel, Shaw Lacy, Danielle L-M, and Chris Feak. There are friends whom I met here and with whom I spent holidays. Minyoung Kwak, Ayoung Kim, Minsung Kwon, and Jinyoung Hwang are the friends who made this journey feel less lonely. My old friends in Korea – Keun-young Shin, Dong-keuk Kang, and Cheol-rak Jeong – have provided me real care, support, and pleasure. In addition, greetings from my colleagues in Korea, Nari Kim and Hyun-mi Lee, made me feel less isolated while studying abroad. I believe I was able to endure all of my difficulties in my everyday life thanks to these people: Chun-Ran Park, Lillian Kuiper, Joo En Grace Kim, and Laura Monschau. Chun-Ran Park helped me know and believe in God when I was in the darkest situations, and she demonstrated godliness of mind and life by her own words and actions. Bible study with Lillian Kuiper provided me with peace, wisdom, and strength. Whenever I see her pure eyes and good spirits, I feel as though I am with a real angel. I am always humbled after talking to Joo En Grace Kim, who has faith in God and maintains her relationship with Him, despite her difficult situation. Laura Monschau offered me invaluable advice and care regarding my every step of life. My final gratitude goes to my family members in Korea to whom I am extremely indebted. Their trust, love, and encouragement made me always feel their presence here with me and have given me the strength to overcome all the difficulties in this new world. I heard my nieces growing up over the phone, and conversations with them always made me happy. I seek my siblings‟ forgiveness for being unable to attend their weddings, and I also seek their understanding that I was not of help when my mother and sister were sick and in the hospital. I sincerely hope that I will be able to show all of my love and support for them in the near future. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... ix LIST OF APPENDICES ..................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Background of the Study and Statement of the Problem ................................................ 1 The role of habitus ...................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Study ....................................................................................................... 6 Significance of the Study ................................................................................................ 8 Organization of the Study ............................................................................................. 10 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................................... 12 Review of Literature and Conceptual Framework ............................................................ 12 Theories and Models of College Choice ....................................................................... 12 Economic Perspective of Human Capital Investment .............................................. 12 Limitations of Human Capital Theory: A Perspective from Behavioral Economics ............................................................................................................................... 14 Sociological Criticism of the Economic Notion of Rational Choice .................... 15 Sociological Perspectives.......................................................................................... 17 Status Attainment Theory ..................................................................................... 17 Theories of Capital: Economic, Cultural, and Social Capital ............................... 18 Economic Capital ...................................................................................................... 18 Cultural Capital ......................................................................................................... 20 Social Capital ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sociology As Self-Transformation
    SOCIOLOGY AS BOURDIEU'SSELF-TRANSFORMATION CLASS THEORY The Appeal &The Limitations Academic of as the Revolutionary Work of Pierre Bourdieu DYLAN RILEY ierre Bourdieu was a universal intellectual whose work ranges from P highly abstract, quasi-philosophical explorations to survey research, and whose enormous contemporary influence is only comparable to that previously enjoyed by Sartre or Foucault. Born in 1930 in a small provincial town in southwestern France where his father was the local postman, he made his way to the pinnacle of the French academic establishment, the École Normale Supérieur ( ENS), receiving the agrégation in philosophy in 1955. Unlike many other normaliens of his generation, Bourdieu did not join the Communist Party, although his close collaborator Jean-Claude Passeron did form part of a heterodox communist cell organized by Michel Foucault, and Bourdieu was clearly influenced by Althusserian Marxism in this period.1 Following his agrégation, Bourdieu’s original plan was to produce a thesis under the direction of the eminent philosopher of science and historical epistemologist Georges Canguilhem. But his philosophical career was interrupted by the draf. The young scholar was sent to Algeria, evidently as 1 David Swartz, Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), 20. Catalyst SUMMER 2017 punishment for his anticolonial politics,2 where he performed military service for a year and subsequently decided to stay on as a lecturer in the Faculty of Letters at Algiers.3 Bourdieu’s Algerian experience was decisive for his later intellectual formation; here he turned away from epistemology and toward fieldwork, producing two masterful ethnographic studies: Sociologie de l’Algérie and Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Capital in the Economic Field: a Study of Relationships in an Art Market
    Philosophy of Management DOI 10.1007/s40926-017-0061-2 Cultural Capital in the Economic Field: A Study of Relationships in an Art Market Lars Vigerland1 & Erik A. Borg1 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract In this study of an economic field and its relationships to a cultural field, we apply Pierre Bourdieu’s central concepts of economic capital, cultural capital, symbolic capital and field, and thus follow in a tradition that at the outset was considered to be post-structuralism, but which by Bourdieu later has been brought into the realm of realism. We have mapped relationships between the actors and thus the field structures that these relationships entail. The fields in which a segment of an art world is operating is represented in multi-dimensional figures which illustrate relationships and bonds between the different categories of organiza- tions. Some of the business actors we have studied are engaging in cultural activities with a great deal of autonomy, others are connected to the cultural field in less active ways. In participating in the cultural field they are in different ways and to different extents accumu- lating symbolic capital including prestige and honor. The method we have applied is multiple correspondence analysis which was frequently used by Bourdieu. Keywords Bourdieu . Correspondence analysis . Cultural capital . Economic capital . Field . Multiple correspondence analysis . Symbolic capital Introduction The main purpose of this article is to analyze a business field and its interaction and relationships to actors in an art market and to art, thus an art field. We have studied the market for art in the Stockholm region.
    [Show full text]
  • I: Intellectuals and Their Publics
    I: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SOCIOLOGY: MARX MEETS BOURDIEU Michael Burawoy ools rush in where angels fear to tread. To critically engage the works of Pierre F Bourdieu is a daunting if not foolhardy task. Pierre Bourdieu was and is the greatest sociologist of our era. He is uniquely regarded as a contemporary founding father of sociology, with the stature of Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Like them he is steeped in philosophy, in history, in methodology, and like them he has a developed theory of contemporary society – its reproduction and its dynamics. Furthermore, like them his works are relentlessly empirical ranging from work on photography, painting, literature, sport, to the analysis of contemporary stratification, education, the state, and language. His writings straddle sociology and anthropology, in particular his treatment of peasant family strategies in the villages of the Béarn where he was born, and his Algeria books written during the period of anti-colonial struggles where he began his sociological career. His methods range from sophisticated statistical analysis to in depth interviewing and participant observation. His meta-theoretical innovations, relentlessly applied to different historical contexts and different spheres of society, revolve around the development of a theory of fields, capital and habitus. There has been no sociologist with his originality or scope. If there is one theme that threads through his work it is the unmasking of domination, and in particular the analysis of symbolic domination – domination that is 2 not recognized as such. While intellectuals denounce physical violence throughout the world, they do not appreciate that they, too, are the perpetrators of violence, symbolic violence that conceals the taken-for-granted – “doxic” -- domination, incorporated in bodies and language.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Social History of the Present: Pierre Bourdieu As Historical Sociologist
    Craig Calhoun For the social history of the present: Pierre Bourdieu as historical sociologist Book section Original citation: Originally published in Calhoun, Craig (2013) For the social history of the present: Pierre Bourdieu as historical sociologist. In: Gorski, Philip S. , (ed.) Bourdieu and Historical Analysis. Politics, history, and culture. Duke University Press, Durham, USA, pp. 36-67. ISBN 9780822352730 © 2013 Duke University Press This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48489/ Available in LSE Research Online: January 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Forthoming in Philip Gorski, ed.: Bourdieu, Theory and Historical Sociology (Duke 2012) For the Social History of the Present : Bourdieu as Historical Sociologist Craig Calhoun It is typical to approach the work of Pierre Bourdieu through the analytic concepts he made influential: habitus, symbolic violence, field, capital, practice and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Investments in Informational Capital
    Martin D. Munk WORKING PAPER 21:2007 TRANSNATIONAL INVESTMENTS IN INFORMATIONAL CAPITAL A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DENMARK, FRANCE AND SWEDEN RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, INTEGRATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TRANSNATIONAL INVESTMENTS IN INFORMATIONAL CAPITAL A Comparative Study of Denmark, France and Sweden Martin D. Munk Working Paper 21:2007 The Working Paper Series of The Danish National Institute of Social Research contain interim results of research and preparatory studies. The Working Paper Series provide a basis for professional discussion as part of the research process. Readers should note that results and interpretations in the final report or article may differ from the present Working Paper. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including ©-notice, is given to the source. TRANSNATIONAL INVESTMENTS IN INFORMATIONAL CAPITAL A Comparative Study of Denmark, France and Sweden Martin D. Munk October 2007 Keywords: Education, Informational Capital, Transnational Investments, Student Mobility, Zones of Prestige. 1 ABSTRACT This paper analyses the acquisition of informational capital, e.g. academic capital, measured as student mobility, and understood as transnational investments in prestigious foreign educational institutions. In the 1990s, educational “zones of prestige” have especially been the United States, the United Kingdom and, to some extent, Germany and France. Official statistics from Sweden, Denmark and France regarding the outflow of students show increasing student mobility. In particular, the study reveals that students from the upper and upper middle social classes (measured by parental occupation) are more likely than students from other social classes to pursue transnational investments, even though students from the middle and working classes have now entered the competition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Social Capital on Economic and Social Outcomes C 2008 I.˙ S
    The Impact of Social Capital on Economic and Social Outcomes c 2008 I.˙ S. Ak¸comak All rights reserved. Cover artwork by I.Semih˙ Ak¸comak Prepared with LATEX Published by Universitaire Pers Maastricht ISBN 978 90 5278 799 2 Printed in the Netherlands by Datawyse Maastricht The Impact of Social Capital on Economic and Social Outcomes Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Maastricht, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Prof. Mr. G.P.M.F. Mols, volgens het besluit van het College van Decanen, in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 12 februari 2009 om 14.00 uur door Ibrahim˙ Semih Ak¸comak UMP UNIVERSITAIRE PERS MAASTRICHT Promotor: Prof. Dr. P. Mohnen Co-promotor: Dr. B.J. ter Weel, Centraal Planbureau en Universiteit Maastricht Beoordelingscommissie: Prof. Dr. L. Borghans, voorzitter Prof. Dr. J.H. Garretsen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Prof. Dr. H.L.F. de Groot, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof. Dr. L.L.G. Soete Prof. Dr. B. Verspagen This research is financed by Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organizations (METEOR) Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 From informal societies to social capital . 2 1.2 Main argument . 6 1.3 Outline of the thesis . 11 2 Bridges in social capital: A review of the literature and the social capital of social capital researchers 15 2.1 Introduction . 15 2.2 Origins of social capital . 18 2.3 Social capital . 20 2.3.1 Defining social capital . 21 2.3.2 Is social capital a form of “capital”? . 28 2.3.3 “Adverse” social capital .
    [Show full text]
  • An Economic Sociological Look at Economic Anthropology
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Aspers, Patrik; Darr, Asaf; Kohl, Sebastian Article An economic sociological look at economic anthropology economic sociology_the european electronic newsletter Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Aspers, Patrik; Darr, Asaf; Kohl, Sebastian (2007) : An economic sociological look at economic anthropology, economic sociology_the european electronic newsletter, ISSN 1871-3351, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 3-10 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/155897 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available
    [Show full text]
  • The Valuation of Liabilities, Economic Capital, and RAROC in a Dynamic Model ∗
    The Valuation of Liabilities, Economic Capital, and RAROC in a Dynamic Model ∗ Daniel Bauery Department of Risk and Insurance. University of Wisconsin-Madison 975 University Avenue. Madison, WI 53706. USA George Zanjani Department of Economics, Finance, and Legal Studies. University of Alabama 361 Stadium Drive. Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. USA February 2019 Abstract We revisit the foundations of economic capital and RAROC calculations prevalent in the insurance industry by extending the canonical static setting to a dynamic model with differ- ent ways of raising capital. The dynamic results suggest two important modifications to the conventional approach to risk measurement and capital allocation. First, “capital” should be defined broadly to include the continuation value of the firm. Second, cash flow valuations must reflect risk adjustments to account for company effective risk aversion. We illustrate these results in a calibrated version of our model using data from a catastrophe reinsurer. We find that the dynamic modifications are practically significant—although static approximations with a properly calibrated company risk aversion are quite accurate. JEL classification: G22; G32; C63 Keywords: risk management; economic capital; catastrophe reinsurance; RAROC ∗We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS) under the project “Allocation of Costs of Holding Capital,” and an anonymous reinsurance company for supplying the data. An earlier version of this paper was awarded the 2015 Hachemeister Prize. We are grateful
    [Show full text]
  • Econsoc 04-2 | Bourdieu and Economic Sociology
    6 février 2003 - Université de Rouen pagina 1 van 42 Vol. 4, 2 (March 2003) TABLE OF CONTENTS Note from the Editor Bourdieu and economic sociology . Bourdieu’s Advocacy of the Concept of Interest and Its Role in Economic Sociology, by Richard Swedberg . Bourdieu: Gary Becker's Critic, By Bernard Convert . Class Analysis and Cultural Analysis in Bourdieu, By Elliot B. Weininger . "Le patronat norvégien": State vs. Market? Capital Structures, Oppositions and Political Position Taking in the Norwegian Field of Power, By Johs. Hjellbrekke and Olav Korsnes. Economic Sociology and the sociology of economics . What is sociological about the sociology of economics ? Some recent developments, By Marion Fourcade-Gourinchas. Publication announcements Conference announcements . Sixth European Sociological Association Conference, which Murcia, Spain, 23-26 September, 2003. 36th World Congress, the International Institute of Sociology, Beijing, July 7-11, 2003, organised by the "International Institute of Sociology" and the "Institute of Sociology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS)", Session (No 51): "Adaptations to Globalisation: The role of social capital". Beyond Traditional Employment. Industrial Relations in the Network Economy. 13th World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association (IIRA), September 8 – 12, 2003, Free University of Berlin, Germany. Appel à communication NOTE FROM THE EDITOR This new issue of the Economic Sociology Newsletter contains material and reflexions for a better understanding of Pierre Bourdieu’s contribution to economic sociology. Bourdieu never supported "overspecialization" inside the social sciences and was very reluctant to define his contribution to the scientific knowledge of economic activities as a particular kind of " economic sociology". But his theoretical and empirical work since the beginning of the 1960s was largely motivated and dynamized by a direct confrontation to file://C:\ES\TMP1049402860.htm 03/04/2003 6 février 2003 - Université de Rouen pagina 2 van 42 economic models and economic explanations.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Good Economic Capital Model? Seminar on Reinsurance 2010 an Interactive Session for a Lively Discussion Between Audience Members and Panelists
    What Makes a Good Economic Capital Model? Seminar on Reinsurance 2010 An interactive session for a lively discussion between audience members and panelists. Economic Capital Models are being discussed frequently by rating agencies, regulators, boards of directors, and investment analysts. What are the ingredients for "good" EC models ‐ and their proper role in an ERM framework? Barry Zurbuchen, FCAS, MAAA, ARe. Allied World Assurance Rachel Radoff, FCAS, MAAA. Montpelier Re Stuart White, FIA. XL Capital Antitrust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering strictly to thlhe letter an d sp iifhirit of the ant itrust laws. Sem inars con ducte d under the auspices of the CAS are designed solely to provide a forum for the expression of various points of view on topics described in the ppgrograms or ag endas for such meeting s. Under no circumstances shall CAS seminars be used as a means for competing companies or firms to reach any understanding – expresse d o r implie d – tha t r estri ct s comp etiti on or in an y way impairs the ability of members to exercise independent business judgment regarding matters affecting competition. It is the responsibility of all seminar participants to be aware of antitrust regulations, to prevent any written or verbal discussions that appear to violate these laws, and to adhere in every respect to thCAShe CAS ant itrust comp liance po licy. Agenda 1. Qualities of a good ECM 2. Basic model structure and key issues a) Reserve risk b) One year vs. ultimate c) Investment risk d) Bad debt risk e) Shock & Attritional f) Correlations g) Catastrophe h) OtilOperational Ris k 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline and Assess Bourdieu's Explanation of Social Inequality
    Outline and assess Bourdieu’s explanation of social inequality. Emily Tabb Pierre Bourdieu has been a long standing figure in the realms of sociological thought. His most widely known work being, Distinction: a critique of judgement and taste, which has been ranked as the 6th most important social scientific work of the of the 20th century (Swartz and Zolberg, 2004:2). He gave a different approach to the structure/ agency, subjective/objective debate, believing they overlapped and elaborated on Marx’s predominantly objective account of social class that economy was the sole reason for social inequality. Instead his notion encompassed the relations between culture and power and how this shapes social class. Bourdieu utilises four concepts to explain social inequality: habitus, field, capital and symbolic violence. This essay will attempt to explain and assess these concepts and their interaction between one another which according to Bourdieu causes social inequality. Bourdieu believes that ‘social life cannot be understood as simply the aggregate of individual behaviour’ (Jenkins, 1992:74), so that structures need to be analysed too. However these structures do not necessarily control and dominate agents as Marx, Althusser and others thought. Bourdieu creates a bridge between these two dualisms in the form of ‘habitus’. The original meaning of Habitus is that ‘it is an acquired system of generative schemes objectively adjusted to the particular to the particular conditions in which it is constituted’ (Bourdieu, 1977:95). Bourdieu retains some of the concept’s original meaning with the relation between habitus, body and field. ‘For Bourdieu, the body is a mnemonic device upon and in which the very basics of culture, the practical taxonomies of the habitus, are imprinted and encoded in a socialising or learning process which commences in early childhood’(Jenkins, 1992 :76).
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Theory and Social Inequality
    Critical theory and social inequality Boike Rehbein* The relation between science and society has been discussed by all proponents of critical theory. And all of them have linked it to inequality in a similar way. However, most of them interpreted inequality as an economic issue, as an unequal distribution of economic capital. This interpretation presupposes a full-fledged capitalist society and thereby implies a strong Western bias. And it also distorts the relation between capitalism and inequality. According to the argument of this paper, inequality is more fundamental than the economy and capitalism, not the other way around. The misinterpretation of capitalism contributes to the persistence of inequality and capi- talism itself. Therefore, we have to critically review our interpretation of inequality. The following argument is based on more than a decade of empirical research on inequality in several countries around the world (Jodhka et al, 2017). It includes almost 2,000 qualitative interviews in twelve nation states on four continents. The interviews were conducted in the local languages, transcribed and interpreted by multicultural teams. A few quantitative surveys complemented the study. This pa- per will not present the empirical findings of our research on inequality but draws some general conclusions relevant for critical theory. However, some results of that research on Brazil, Germany and Laos will appear in the final section of the paper. The first two sections deal with the relation between subject and object as well as the relevance of inequality in the social sciences. The third section is devoted to *Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
    [Show full text]