Black Market Capital

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Black Market Capital BLACK MARKET CAPITAL Steven M. Davidoff* Introduction .......................................................................... 175 I. The Rise of Private Equity and Hedge Funds .......... 183 A . Private Equity ...................................................... 183 B . H edge Funds ........................................................ 191 II. The Regulation of Private Equity and Hedge F u nd s .......................................................................... 20 1 A. The Investment Company Act ............................ 201 B. The Investment Advisers Act .............................. 206 III. The SEC, Private Equity, and Hedge Funds ............ 211 A. SEC Regulation of Hedge Funds ........................ 211 B. SEC Regulation of Private Equity ...................... 216 IV. On Black Market Capital ........................................... 217 A. The Economics of Black Market Capital ............ 217 B. A Black Market for Alternative Investments and M arkets ......................................................... 219 1. Fund A dvisers ................................................. 219 2. SPA C s ............................................................. 224 3. Alternative Markets ....................................... 228 4. BDCs, STACs, ETFs and Indexes .................. 231 V. On Irrationality, Distortion, and Anti- Com petitiveness ......................................................... 236 A. Black Market Capital's Irrational and Distortive Effects ................................................. 236 1. Black Market Investments ............................ 236 2. Black Market Markets ................................... 241 3. Black Market Capital's Competitive Harm .. 243 * Assistant Professor of Law, Wayne State University Law School. B.A., University of Pennsylvania; J.D., Columbia University School of Law; M.S., Finance, London Business School. The author would like to thank Erica Beecher-Monas, Peter Henning, Roberta Karmel, Troy Pare- des, and Houman Shadab and the faculty work-shop attendees at Brook- lyn Law School for their helpful comments and suggestions as well as Laura Berdish at the University of Michigan Business School library and Stefanie Schiffer and Neil Williams for their invaluable research assis- tance. No. 1:172] BLACK MARKET CAPITAL VI. Toward Retail Capital ................................................ 246 A. The Open Market Solution's Benefits ................. 247 B. The Open Market Solution's Costs ..................... 250 C . Investor Risk ........................................................ 250 D . System ic Risk ....................................................... 257 E. Cyclicality and the Relevance of Investment Perform ance ......................................................... 259 F. SEC Imprimatur and Distraction ....................... 260 G. The Open Market Solution's Structure .............. 261 V II. C onclusion .................................................................. 265 Hedge funds and private equity offer unique investing op- portunities, including the possibility for diversified and ex- cess returns. Yet, current federal securities regulation effec- tively prohibits the public offer and purchase in the United States of these hedge fund and private equity investments. Public investors, foreclosed from purchasinghedge funds and private equity, instead seek to replicate their benefits. This demand drives public investors to substitute less-suitable, publicly available investments which attempt to mimic the characteristicsof hedge funds or private equity. This effect, which this Article terms black market capital, is an economic spur for a number of recent capital markets phenomena, in- cluding fund adviser IPOs, special purpose acquisition com- panies, hedged mutual funds and specialized exchange traded funds, all of which largely attempt to replicateprivate equity or hedge fund returns and have been marketed to pub- lic investors on this basis. Black market capital has not only altered the structure of the U.S. capital market but has shifted capital flows to non-U.S. markets and engendered the creation of U.S. private markets. This Article identifies and examines the ramifications of black market capital. It finds this effect to be an irrationalby-product of current hedge fund and private equity regulation, one likely harmful to U.S. capital markets. These are external costs inherent in the cur- rent regulatory scheme which the SEC has not recognized. The SEC should consequently undertake a thorough cost- benefit analysis of its hedge fund and private equity regula- tion. Based on the available evidence, such an analysis is 174 COLUMBIA B USINESS LAW RE VIE W [Vol. 2008 likely to conclude that the benefits of a regulatory scheme permitting the public offer of hedge funds and private equity funds as a component investment of a diversified portfolio not only exceed its costs but is superiorto current regulation. No. 1:172] BLACK MARKET CAPITAL No. 1:172] BLACK MARKET CAPITAL INTRODUCTION Hedge funds and private equity have become influential forces in American capital markets.' They are also contro- versial. Both hedge funds and private equity have been stri- dently criticized for their exorbitant fees and the spectacular profits of some of their managers, their involvement in a number of high-profile, controversial transactions and in- vestment scandals, and the systemic and idiosyncratic risks these investments pose.2 Yet, their out-size presence has undoubtedly altered the structure of U.S. capital markets: twenty-eight percent of the aggregate amount of announced domestic takeovers in 2007 involved private equity' while hedge funds have emerged as vocal public company share- holder activists and a source of market liquidity, diversifica- tion, and risk-management.4 The influence of these two in- vestment classes is only likely to increase. Hedge funds held an estimated $2.79 trillion in assets as of the close of 2007, a 16.95% increase over the previous year.5 Meanwhile, private equity domestically raised an estimated $302 billion in eq- uity commitments in 2007, a nineteen percent increase over the prior year when $255 billion was raised, and an amount ' I define the terms hedge funds and private equity infra Parts I.B and I.A, respectively. 2 See Jonathan H. Gatsik, Hedge Funds: The Ultimate Game of Liar's Poker, 35 SUFFOLK U. L. REV. 591 (2001); Jenny Anderson, Like Them or Loathe Them, Hedge Funds Aren't Going Away, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 12, 2007, at C5; Andrew Ross Sorkin, Of Private Equity, Politics and Income Taxes, N.Y. TIMES, Mar. 11, 2007, at 37; Jenny Anderson, The Private Lives of Hedge Funds, N.Y. TIMES, Dec. 29, 2006, at C1; David F. Swensen, Op-Ed., Invest at Your Own Risk, N.Y. TIMEs, Oct. 19, 2005, at A21. 3 Dealogic Database (search data on file with author). See infra notes 83-85 and accompanying text. See Hedge fund assets rise to USD2.8trn, says asset flows report, www.hedgeweek.com, Feb. 12, 2008. http://www.hedgeweek.com/articles/detail.jsp?contentid=243020 (last vis- ited Feb. 17, 2008). COLUMBIA BUSINESS LAW REVIEW [Vol. 2008 which will likely sustain well over a trillion dollars in new corporate acquisitions . Private equity and hedge funds, in particular, are capital markets phenomena which have achieved significance only in recent decades. Yet, the primary regulatory law which purports to govern them, the Investment Company Act,7 dates to 1940, and the regulations thereunder governing open-end investment companies have largely been promul- gated to regulate the mutual fund industry.8 The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has refused to accommo- date the differing structure and operation of hedge funds and private equity. Instead, the Investment Company Act and its related regulation effectively prevent hedge funds and pri- vate equity from accessing the public market for investors.9 Hedge funds and private equity consequently avoid applica- tion of the Investment Company Act by forgoing public capi- tal-raising; they alternatively raise capital from high net- worth investors and pension and other investment funds in the U.S. private market or otherwise in foreign fund-raising which excludes U.S. investors altogether. In either case, the 6 See Private equity enjoys record fund-raising in 2007, S.F. Bus. TIMEs, Jan. 8, 2008, available at http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2008/01/07/daily2l.html. Hedge funds and private equity are generally not required to publicly dis- close their performance, assets under management, or capital raised; the figures for these measures cited throughout this Article are thus estimates based on publicly available information and voluntary disclosure made to private database services. 7 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-1 to 80a-64 (2007). ' The Investment Company Act defines an open-end investment com- pany as "a management company which is offering for sale or has out- standing any redeemable security of which it is the issuer." A closed-end investment company is defined as "any management company other than an open-end company." Id. § 80a-5(a). Because they permit redemptions, hedge funds and private equity funds are classified as open-end invest- ment companies under the Investment Company Act. ' See generally Roberta S. Karmel, Mutual Funds, Pension Funds, Hedge Funds and Stock Market Volatility-What Regulation by the Securi- ties and Exchange Commission is Appropriate?80 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 909 (2005) (discussing SEC attitude towards, and political forces
Recommended publications
  • Why Convertible Arbitrage Is a True Market Neutral Strategy
    WHY CONVERTIBLE ARBITRAGE IS A TRUE MARKET NEUTRAL STRATEGY How does convertible arbitrage perform in different markets? Transcript of a video recorded on November 30, 2017. Eli Pars, Co-CIO, Head of Alternative Strategies and Co-Head of Convertible Strategies, Senior Co-PM, explains that convertible arbitrage has performed well in most equity market environments—and that the strategy has done its best in declining equity markets historically. ELI PARS The nice thing is it tends to perform well in most equity market environments. In a rising market, you benefit from Co-CIO, Head of the net long, the net long embedded in the hedge. So you can make a little bit of money there and you can trade Alternative Strategies and Co-Head of around the volatility. It tends to do a little better in more volatile markets. Convertible Strategies, Senior Co-PM The interesting thing is, historically, it’s often done its best in declining equity markets. Now, sometimes it depends on the nature of the equity market and the nature of the bear market, but if you look back to the early 2000s when the equity market sold off materially, convert arb did really well. Investors made money, made significant money in a lot of cases, when the equity market was down. That wasn’t the case in 2008 when it was more of a financial crisis, but it’s kind of helpful for investors as they look forward and think where the next bear market might be. If to the extent you’re in the camp that you think that ultimately it’ll be an over-valued equity market that corrects similar to what we had in the early 2000s, that could quite possibly be a very nice environment for convert arb.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Actplussm Application for Hedge Funds and Private
    Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. Administrative Offices/Mailing Address: Home Office 82 Hopmeadow Street Wilmington, Delaware 19805-1297 Simsbury, Connecticut 06070-7683 40ACTPLUSSM APPLICATION FOR HEDGE FUNDS AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT FUNDS NOTICE: THE POLICY FOR WHICH THIS APPLICATION IS MADE APPLIES, SUBJECT TO ITS TERMS, ONLY TO “CLAIMS” FIRST MADE DURING THE “POLICY PERIOD,” OR ANY EXTENDED REPORTING PERIOD. THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY AVAILABLE TO PAY DAMAGES OR SETTLEMENTS WILL BE REDUCED, AND MAY BE EXHAUSTED, BY “DEFENSE EXPENSES,” AND “DEFENSE EXPENSES” WILL BE APPLIED AGAINST THE RETENTION. THE UNDERWRITER HAS NO DUTY UNDER THIS POLICY TO DEFEND ANY “CLAIM.” ACCEPTANCE OR RECEIPT BY THE UNDERWRITER OF THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT OBLIGATE THE UNDERWRITER TO ISSUE ANY POLICY OF INSURANCE, NOR PROVIDE REQUESTED COVERAGE FOR ALL ENTITIES LISTED IN THIS APPLICATION OR IN ANY SCHEDULE ATTACHED HERETO. PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE APPLICATION CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING. 1. (a) Name of Applicant: Business Address: City: State: ZIP Code: Web site Internet address (if applicable): (b) Name and title of the officer at the principal sponsor or organization for the Applicant designated as the representative to receive all notices from the Underwriter on behalf of all person(s) and entity(ies) proposed for this insurance: 2. (a) SCHEDULE OF PRIVATE FUNDS (Please attach separate sheet if necessary.) Name of Type Total Total General Partner’s Minimum 3(c)7 Fund Structure Date Private (see chart Assets Equity Equity Invest- (Yes/No) (LP, LLC, Opened Fund below) Market ($mm) ($mm) ment etc.) Value ($mm) ($mm) TYPES OF PRIVATE FUNDS Market Neutral Distressed Securities Market Timing Funds of Funds Aggressive Growth Short Selling Emerging Markets Global Macro Merger Arbitrage Income Convertible Arbitrage Other: Form C27429 (08/2012) 1 Catalog No.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Neutral Strategies Attractive for Institutional Investors
    2015 December To Pair Trade, or not to Pair Trade... exploring different views and routes to an equity market neutral portfolio Michelin Stars in the Market Neutral World What makes Market Neutral strategies attractive for institutional Investors This Time, it IS Different A Rationale for Market Neutral Strategies Königsdisziplin The Art of being Market Neutral Market Neutral Strategies The Key to Alpha in any Market Direction www.hedgenordic.com - December 2015 www.hedgenordic.com - December 2015 Contents INTRODUCTION HedgeNordic is the leading media covering the Nordic alternative investment and hedge fund universe. THIS TIME IT IS DIFFERENT CORPORATE EVENTS SAME NAME, DIFFERENT ANIMAL The website brings daily news, research, A RATIONALE FOR EQUITY MARKET NEUTRAL STRATEGIES AS CATALYST FOR ALPHA THE EVOLUTION OF MARKET NEUTRAL STRATEGIES GENERATION analysis and background that is relevant to Nordic hedge fund professionals from the sell and buy side from all tiers. HedgeNordic publishes monthly, quarterly and annual reports on recent developments in her core market as well as special, indepth reports on “hot topics”. HedgeNordic also calculates and publishes the Nordic Hedge Index (NHX) and is host to the Nordic Hedge Award and organizes round tables and seminars. Upcoming Industry & Special Reports: February 2016: 12 40 Real Estate & Infrastructure HEALTH CARE - RAM ACTIVE INVESTMENTS KÖNIGSDISZIPLIN February 2016: A GREAT PLACE TO BE MARKET A BETA NEUTRAL APPROACH TO THE ART OF BEING Managed Futures / Global Macro NEUTRAL EQUITY INVESTING MARKET NEUTRAL March 2016: HedgeNordic Industry Report May 2016: ESG / SRI in the alternative space 42 24 36 20 Contact: MERRANT: Nordic Business Media AB TWO TO TANGO Merrant: THE MARKET NEUTRAL The Editor – My opening lines..
    [Show full text]
  • Securitization & Hedge Funds
    SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: CREATING A MORE EFFICIENT MARKET BY CLARK CHENG, CFA Intangis Funds AUGUST 6, 2002 INTANGIS PAGE 1 SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 3 PROBLEM.................................................................................................................................................... 4 SOLUTION................................................................................................................................................... 5 SECURITIZATION..................................................................................................................................... 5 CASH-FLOW TRANSACTIONS............................................................................................................... 6 MARKET VALUE TRANSACTIONS.......................................................................................................8 ARBITRAGE................................................................................................................................................ 8 FINANCIAL ENGINEERING.................................................................................................................... 8 TRANSPARENCY......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Better Equity Market Neutral Strategy
    Building a Better Equity Market Neutral Strategy Gabriel Feghali, CFA April 2015 Global Stock Selection Equity Market Neutral (EMN) is a well- Dan Villalon, CFA established strategy designed to deliver positive performance without exposing investors to the Portfolio Solutions Group risk of the overall equity market. We believe this strategy, with its long-term institutional track record, can be efficiently managed not only as a limited partnership but also as a registered investment product. This paper describes our approach in building an EMN strategy that seeks to systematically capture positive returns from global stocks, regardless of market direction. We thank Adam Akant, April Frieda, Marco Hanig, Albert Kim, Maston O’Neal, Lukasz Pomorski, Adrienne Ross and Daniel AQR Capital Management, LLC Schwartz for helpful comments and suggestions; and Jennifer Two Greenwich Plaza Buck for design and layout. Greenwich, CT 06830 p: +1.203.742.3600 f: +1.203.742.3100 w: aqr.com Building a Better Equity Market Neutral Strategy 1 Introduction The Equity Market Neutral Landscape Most investors’ portfolios are less diversified than Hedge funds have managed EMN strategies for they appear. Although investors allocate almost decades, and the category has posted strong long- half of their capital to asset classes other than term risk-adjusted and total returns (see Exhibit equities, those asset classes tend to be relatively 1). EMN strategies have also shown less-severe less volatile. Consequently, overall portfolio risk drawdowns than equities and the traditional is predominantly driven by just one source: equity 60/40 portfolio (Exhibit 2), while maintaining markets. The result is that good and bad equity attractive diversification characteristics — from market performance overwhelmingly determines 1990 to November 2014, the correlation between good and bad portfolio performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Returns
    Absolute Returns The Risk and Opportunities of Hedge Fund Investing by Alexander M. Ineichen John Wiley & Sons © 2002 514 pages Focus Take-Aways Leadership & Mgt. • Sociologist Alfred Winslow Jones set up the fi rst hedge fund in 1949. Strategy • Warren Buffett set up a fund that fi ts today’s perception of a hedge fund in the 1950s. Sales & Marketing • Absolute return money managers play both the long and short side of the market. Corporate Finance • Good hedge fund managers specialize. Analyzing their motivation and performance Human Resources is diffi cult. Technology & Production • Markets are never completely effi cient, and active managers can beat them sometimes. Small Business Economics & Politics • Arbitrage traders take offsetting positions in related instruments whose performance is fairly predictable. Industries & Regions • Market neutral strategies are a form of arbitrage that seeks to exploit market Career Development ineffi ciencies by holding roughly equivalent long and short positions. Personal Finance • These strategies have been quite profi table. Concepts & Trends • One investor’s risk is another’s opportunity. • Hedge fund investing may represent a paradigm shift or it may be a bubble. Rating (10 is best) Overall Applicability Innovation Style 8 8 8 7 To purchase individual Abstracts, personal subscriptions or corporate solutions, visit our Web site at www.getAbstract.com or call us at our U.S. offi ce (954-359-4070) or Switzerland office (+41-41-367-5151). getAbstract is an Internet-based knowledge rating service and publisher of book Abstracts. getAbstract maintains complete editorial responsibility for all parts of this Abstract. The respective copyrights of authors and publishers are acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • I Hedge Fund Basics
    ccc_strachman_ch01_9-44.qxd 6/15/05 12:03 PM Page 9 1Chapter Hedge Fund Basics or the better part of the past twenty years, the only time the press mentioned hedge funds was when one blew up or some Fsort of crisis hit one of the world’s many markets. All that changed in the late summer of 1998. The currency crisis in Asia spread to Russia, then crept into Europe, and finally hit the shores of the United States in mid-July and early August. Many who follow the markets assumed that things were bad and were going to stay that way for a very long time. And of course the first people who were looked at when the volatility hit was the hedge fund community. Although no one knew for sure what was going on and who and how much was lost, one thing was clear: Many of the most famous hedge funds were in trouble. After COPYRIGHTEDweeks of speculation and rumors, MATERIAL the market finally heard the truth: The world’s “greatest investor” and his colleagues had made a mistake. At a little before 4 P.M. eastern standard time (EST) on Wednesday, August 26, Stanley Druckenmiller made the an- nouncement on CNBC in a matter-of-fact way: The Soros organiza- tion, in particular its flagship hedge fund, the Quantum Fund, had lost more than $2 billion in recent weeks in the wake of the currency 9 ccc_strachman_ch01_9-44.qxd 6/15/05 12:03 PM Page 10 10 HEDGE FUND BASICS crisis in Russia. The fund had invested heavily in the Russian mar- kets and the trades had gone against them.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Market Peso Exchange As a Mechanism to Place Substantial Amounts of Currency from U.S
    United States Department of the Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network FinCEN Advisory Subject: This advisory is provided to alert banks and other depository institutions Colombian to a large-scale, complex money laundering system being used extensively by Black Market Colombian drug cartels to launder the proceeds of narcotics sales. This Peso Exchange system is affecting both U.S. financial depository institutions and many U.S. businesses. The information contained in this advisory is intended to help explain how this money laundering system works so that U.S. financial institutions and businesses can take steps to help law enforcement counter it. Overview Date: November Drug sales in the United States are estimated by the Office of National 1997 Drug Control Policy to generate $57.3 billion annually, and most of these transactions are in cash. Through concerted efforts by the Congress and the Executive branch, laws and regulatory actions have made the movement of this cash a significant problem for the drug cartels. America’s banks have effective systems to report large cash transactions and report suspicious or Advisory: unusual activity to appropriate authorities. As a result of these successes, the Issue 9 placement of large amounts of cash into U.S. financial institutions has created vulnerabilities for the drug organizations and cartels. Efforts to avoid report- ing requirements by structuring transactions at levels well below the $10,000 limit or camouflage the proceeds in otherwise legitimate activity are continu- ing. Drug cartels are also being forced to devise creative ways to smuggle the cash out of the country. This advisory discusses a primary money laundering system used by Colombian drug cartels.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclical Dependence and Timing in Market Neutral Hedge Funds∗
    Cyclical dependence and timing in market neutral hedge funds∗ Julio A. Crego Julio Galvez´ Tilburg University CEMFI <[email protected]> <galvez@cemfi.edu.es> May 9, 2018 Abstract We explore a new dimension of dependence of hedge fund returns with the market portfolio by examining linear correlation and tail dependence conditional on the financial cycle. Using a large sample of hedge funds that are considered “market neutral”, we doc- ument that the low correlation of market neutral hedge funds with the market is composed of a negative correlation during bear periods and a positive one during bull periods. In contrast, the remaining styles present a positive correlation throughout the cycle. We also find that while they present tail dependence during bull periods, we cannot reject tail neu- trality in times of financial turmoil. Consistent with these results, we show that market neutral hedge funds present state timing ability that cannot be explained by other forms of timing ability. Using individual hedge fund data, we find that funds that implement share restrictions are more likely to time the state. Keywords: Hedge funds, market neutrality, state timing, tail dependence, risk management. JEL: G11, G23. ∗We would like to thank Dante Amengual, Patrick Gagliardini, Ramiro Losada, Javier Menc´ıa, Andrew Pat- ton, Guillermo Tellechea, Rafael Repullo, Enrique Sentana, Javier Suarez, Andrea Tamoni, and numerous sem- inar and conference audiences for helpful comments. We thank Vikas Agarwal for providing the option factor data. Crego acknowledges financial support from the Santander Research Chair at CEMFI. Galvez´ acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness grant no.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Legal Marijuana Use Age and Its Enforcement in California, a State Where Recreational Marijuana Is Legal
    An examination of the legal marijuana use age and its enforcement in California, a state where recreational marijuana is legal March 2021 James C. Fell NORC at the University of Chicago Traci Toomey University of Minnesota Angela H. Eichelberger Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Julie Kubelka NORC at the University of Chicago Daniel Schriemer Darin Erickson University of Minnesota Contents ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 4 METHOD ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Enforcement of minimum legal marijuana use age of 21 (MLMU-21) laws ...................................... 6 Pseudo-underage patron entry attempts ............................................................................................... 7 Sample design ............................................................................................................................ 8 Recruitment of pseudo-underage patrons ................................................................................. 9 Data collection protocol ............................................................................................................ 9 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of World-Systems Research
    JOURNAL OF WORLD-SYSTEMS RESEARCH ISSN: 1076-156X | Vol. # 21 No. 2 | http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2015.9 | jwsr.org From Socialism Vol.to Hedge 1 | DOI Fund: 10.5195/JWSR.1 The Human Element and the New History of Capitalism David Huyssen The University of York [email protected] Abstract Alfred Winslow Jones was a socialist who founded the first hedge fund in 1949. Born in 1900, he had occupied successive positions of diplomatic, academic, and journalistic influence, and his invention of the modern hedge fund has had an outsized impact on global capitalism’s contemporary round of financialization. His life would therefore appear to offer ideal material for a “great-man” biography. Yet this “great man” also recognized that structural forces were continually undermining his hopes for social change. Following Georgi Derluguian, Giovanni Arrighi, and Marc Bloch, this article proposes a world-system biography of Jones as a method better suited for mapping the internal dialectics of twentieth-century capitalism, using Jones as a human connection between cyclical and structural transformations of capitalism, and across changes of phase from financial to material expansion—and back again. Contemporary hedge funds are the material and symbolic quintessence of the current, hyper-financialized world-system and its ongoing crises of inequality and overaccumulation, or David Harvey’s “vulture capitalism.” Yet they were conceived by a man devoted to rectifying the political-economic chaos following an earlier crisis of overaccumulation. On another level, this article suggests a theoretical reorientation—toward what Bloch called “the human element”—for studies of capitalism’s cultural and material history.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasons in Hell: Charles S. Johnson and the 1930 Liberian Labor Crisis Phillip James Johnson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2004 Seasons in hell: Charles S. Johnson and the 1930 Liberian Labor Crisis Phillip James Johnson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Phillip James, "Seasons in hell: Charles S. Johnson and the 1930 Liberian Labor Crisis" (2004). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3905. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3905 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. SEASONS IN HELL: CHARLES S. JOHNSON AND THE 1930 LIBERIAN LABOR CRISIS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Phillip James Johnson B. A., University of New Orleans, 1993 M. A., University of New Orleans, 1995 May 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first debt of gratitude goes to my wife, Ava Daniel-Johnson, who gave me encouragement through the most difficult of times. The same can be said of my mother, Donna M. Johnson, whose support and understanding over the years no amount of thanks could compensate. The patience, wisdom, and good humor of David H. Culbert, my dissertation adviser, helped enormously during the completion of this project; any student would be wise to follow his example of professionalism.
    [Show full text]