The Way Forward

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Way Forward Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-016-0247-2 The Way Forward Malcolm Fridlund1,2,3 · Artie Hatzes4 · René Liseau3 Received: 11 September 2015 / Accepted: 14 March 2016 © The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract For the last few decades the study of disks around stars young and old and of different types have progressed significantly. During the same time a completely new discipline—the study of exoplanets, planets orbiting stars other than our Sun—have emerged. Both these fields, which are interconnected, have benefited from the development of new instrumentation, and especially by telescopes and detectors deployed in space. In this chapter we are describing the state of the art of such instruments and make an inventory of what is being currently developed. We also state some of the requirements of the next steps and what type of instruments will lead the way forward. Keywords Exoplanets · Starforming disks · Debris disks · Instrumentation: photometers · Instrumentation: space 1 Introduction Our Solar System has a complex architecture that contains (1) Planets of several types, from giant gas giants to rocky terrestrial planets, (2) Debris disks, e.g. the zodiacal dust belt and the Kuiper-Edgeworth belt in the Solar System or disks of the β Pic or AU Mic type, and (3) Planetesimals or remnants thereof—e.g. Comets, Asteroids or Dwarf planets. There is also the Oort cloud of comets stretching tens of thousands of astronomical units from the Sun, but the understanding of the structure of the Oort cloud in the context of star formation is a separate issue and will not be discussed here. One of the ultimate goals of the research into both exoplanets and circumstellar disks is to be able to place this complex picture of our own Solar System into a proper context. B M. Fridlund [email protected] 1 Max-Planck-Institute für Astronomie, Königsthul 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 2 Leiden Observatory, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands 3 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92, Onsala, Sweden 4 Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany M. Fridlund et al. Answering questions like “Is our system a run-of-the-mill kind of system” or is it of a “rarer” kind—or even “unique” is of course central to this research. The answer to such questions is related to the overarching issue of whether we are alone in the Universe. The question of whether life exists elsewhere, than on the Earth, has been discussed by mankind since the beginning of recorded history, or even before, and it is still a fundamental question among scientists and laypersons alike today.1 The understanding of how disks and planetary bodies relate to each other is the key to how planetary systems form and evolve. What kind of planets is the more common? What is the architecture of these planetary systems? And under what conditions were they formed? It must be a consequence of the formation- and evolution-processes that lead to the structure and physics of a specific system or an individual planet. This is very likely due to the conditions leading up to the formation of an accreting star and its associated disk. We can be fairly certain that the existence of planetary systems is a consequence of the process that forms stars. This understanding has not changed significantly since the time when we only had knowledge about only one such system—our own. Our own solar system is of course very important since it is the only place in the Universe where we know that life exists. It is also the only system where we can study individual objects in situ and in exquisite detail. This is evidenced by the fact that we have more than half a dozen working spacecrafts in orbit or on the surface of Mars. As of this writing the New Horizons mission had just made its flyby of the dwarf planet Pluto on its way out into the Solar Systems outer debris disk—the Kuiper-Edgeworth belt. The pioneering Voyager 2 spacecraft has already crossed the heliopause and has become the first human spacecraft to be traveling in interstellar space. And, for more than a year the Rosetta spacecraft has been flying in tandem with Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, giving us valuable, in situ knowledge of a comet/planetesimal. These are indeed exciting times for solar system research. The understanding of star forming and debris disks of different structures and sizes is thus the key to understanding planet formation, specifically the types and masses of planets and the range of orbital distances that can form. Not only must a planet be located in the Habitable Zone (HZ, usually defined as the range of distance from the host star within liquid water can exist). Once such planets have formed, their orbits must be stable for a long enough time to provide the physical conditions for the formation of life. Eventually, the central issue we wish to address is whether we are indeed alone in the Universe. The uniqueness or commonality of the Earth is fundamental to a proper under- standing of such central issues as the properties needed by a planet in order for life to arise, the origin and evolution of life, and of course how common life is in the Universe. To cor- rectly understand these issues we must also understand the context within which life on Earth exists and our place in the Universe. This thought, which has been with us throughout recorded history, can now be explored within the structure of a scientific inquiry. Is the Earth the only one of uncountable planets where life has arisen and evolved to the point that one of its life forms has the ability to formulate such a question? Or are the Earth, and its humans unique? Possibly the Earth formed out of random processes that were quite rare and very special circumstances were needed for higher life forms to evolve. The conditions may have been extremely rare and unlikely, but given the shear number of stars in our Galaxy perhaps it can occur at least once every several billions of years. It could also be that we may be alone in our galaxy, but certainly not alone in the vast Universe. Or.... 1As demonstrated by e.g. The recent announcement that “the Breakthrough Prize Foundation”, an organiza- tion created by investor Yuri Milner, has announced that it will commit $100 million over the next ten years to a new, large-scale SETI initiative. The Way Forward The answer to such questions should be based on sound scientific inquiry and not just speculation. 1.1 The Study of Disks Interstellar disks and the process of stellar and planetary formation and evolution have now been studied in detail for more than 60 years. Through advances in Infrared and mm/sub- mm astronomy a consistent picture has slowly been built up. The Milky Way Galaxy, like all galaxies, is made up of stars, stellar remnants, planets, and an interstellar medium. This Inter Stellar Medium (ISM) is composed of atomic and molecular gas as well as solid matter in the form of dust grains. The densest part of the ISM is mainly located in the plane of our Galaxy and it has different components, one of which is (giant) molecular clouds with a much higher (103–104 times higher) density than the “general” diffuse medium. These molecular clouds consist mainly of H2, but with a significant enrichment of metals that supposedly originated in stars during the later stages of stellar evolution. These were then ejected into interstel- lar space through mass loss and supernova explosions to form the parental environment benevolent to the forming of stars and planets. While elements of the clouds collapse into protostars, some of the molecular material forms a protoplanetary disk, due to the conser- vation of angular momentum. This momentum preserves an enormous amount of rotational energy that the protostar has to lose before it can settle into a stable configuration. This is done through bipolar outflows (atomic and molecular), or jets. Although most of the disk mass and its angular momentum is lost from the system through these processes, a large amount of material is nevertheless left behind in remnant disks. This remaining material disperses slowly during the stellar lifetime either through collisions that form dust and debris disks or through ejections via interactions with the plan- etary bodies. However some of these debris disks remain as evidenced by the dust and large number of small bodies in the Solar System. We have begun to observe more and more of this material in other stellar systems (Eiroa et al. 2013) and essentially all of the stages outlined above have been detected either from the ground or space. Most recently the ESA space observatory Herschel has observed many aspects of these processes for the first time and in greater detail than ever before. On the ground the “first light” of the Atacama Large MM/sub-mm Array (ALMA) have detected the gaps in protoplanetary disks presumably resulting from the “sweeping up” of material by planets being formed (Partnership ALMA 2015). While many of the details in these processes remain to be observed and clarified it appears that at least the broad elements of the picture are understood. One important remaining step is to connect the understanding of the distribution of exoplanets (type of planets, type of orbits, type of host stars) with this picture of the early stages of a planetary system.
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:2003.04650V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 10 Mar 2020 Sphere (Arcangeli Et Al
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. main c ESO 2020 March 11, 2020 Detection of Fe i and Fe ii in the atmosphere of MASCARA-2b using a cross-correlation method M. Stangret1,2, N. Casasayas-Barris1,2, E. Pallé1,2, F. Yan3, A. Sánchez-López4, M. López-Puertas4 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristobal de La Laguna, Spain 3 Institut für Astrophysik, Georg-August-Universität, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 4 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), Glorieta de la Astronomía s/n, 18008 Granada, Spain Received 21 January 2020; accepted 27 February 2020 ABSTRACT Ultra-hot Jupiters are gas giants planets whose dayside temperature, due to the strong irradiation received from the host star, is greater than 2200 K. These kind of objects are perfect laboratories to study chemistry of exoplanetary upper atmospheres via trans- mission spectroscopy. Exo-atmospheric absorption features are buried in the noise of the in-transit residual spectra. However we can retrieve the information of hundreds of atmospheric absorption lines by performing a cross-correlation with an atmospheric transmission model, which allows us to greatly increase the exo-atmospheric signal. At the high-spectral resolution of our data, the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect and centre-to-limb variation have a strong contribution. Here, we present the first detection of Fe i and the confirmation of absorption features of Fe ii in the atmosphere of the ultra-hot Jupiter MASCARA-2b/KELT-20b, by using three transit observations with HARPS-N.
    [Show full text]
  • Exoplanetary Atmospheres: Key Insights, Challenges, and Prospects
    AA57CH15_Madhusudhan ARjats.cls August 7, 2019 14:11 Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics Exoplanetary Atmospheres: Key Insights, Challenges, and Prospects Nikku Madhusudhan Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HA, United Kingdom; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2019. 57:617–63 Keywords The Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics is extrasolar planets, spectroscopy, planet formation, habitability, atmospheric online at astro.annualreviews.org composition https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081817- 051846 Abstract Copyright © 2019 by Annual Reviews. Exoplanetary science is on the verge of an unprecedented revolution. The All rights reserved thousands of exoplanets discovered over the past decade have most recently been supplemented by discoveries of potentially habitable planets around nearby low-mass stars. Currently, the field is rapidly progressing toward de- tailed spectroscopic observations to characterize the atmospheres of these planets. Various surveys from space and the ground are expected to detect numerous more exoplanets orbiting nearby stars that make the planets con- ducive for atmospheric characterization. The current state of this frontier of exoplanetary atmospheres may be summarized as follows. We have entered the era of comparative exoplanetology thanks to high-fidelity atmospheric observations now available for tens of exoplanets. Access provided by Florida International University on 01/17/21. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2019.57:617-663. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Recent studies reveal a rich diversity of chemical compositions and atmospheric processes hitherto unseen in the Solar System. Elemental abundances of exoplanetary atmospheres place impor- tant constraints on exoplanetary formation and migration histories.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland)
    Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland) American Astronomical Society August, 2019 100 — New Discoveries scope (JWST), as well as other large ground-based and space-based telescopes coming online in the next 100.01 — Review of TESS’s First Year Survey and two decades. Future Plans The status of the TESS mission as it completes its first year of survey operations in July 2019 will bere- George Ricker1 viewed. The opportunities enabled by TESS’s unique 1 Kavli Institute, MIT (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) lunar-resonant orbit for an extended mission lasting more than a decade will also be presented. Successfully launched in April 2018, NASA’s Tran- siting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is well on its way to discovering thousands of exoplanets in orbit 100.02 — The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Sur- around the brightest stars in the sky. During its ini- vey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics tial two-year survey mission, TESS will monitor more from 10-100 AU than 200,000 bright stars in the solar neighborhood at Eric Nielsen1; Robert De Rosa1; Bruce Macintosh1; a two minute cadence for drops in brightness caused Jason Wang2; Jean-Baptiste Ruffio1; Eugene Chiang3; by planetary transits. This first-ever spaceborne all- Mark Marley4; Didier Saumon5; Dmitry Savransky6; sky transit survey is identifying planets ranging in Daniel Fabrycky7; Quinn Konopacky8; Jennifer size from Earth-sized to gas giants, orbiting a wide Patience9; Vanessa Bailey10 variety of host stars, from cool M dwarfs to hot O/B 1 KIPAC, Stanford University (Stanford, California, United States) giants. 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology TESS stars are typically 30–100 times brighter than (Pasadena, California, United States) those surveyed by the Kepler satellite; thus, TESS 3 Astronomy, California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, Califor- planets are proving far easier to characterize with nia, United States) follow-up observations than those from prior mis- 4 Astronomy, U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Based Search for the Brightest Transiting Planets with the Multi-Site All-Sky Camera - MASCARA
    Ground-based search for the brightest transiting planets with the Multi-site All-Sky CAmeRA - MASCARA Ignas A. G. Snellena, Remko Stuika, Ramon Navarrob, Felix Bettonvilb, Matthew Kenworthya, Ernst de Mooijc , Gilles Ottena , Rik ter Horstb & Rudolf le Poolea aLeiden Observatory, Leiden University, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands bNOVA Optical and Infrared Instrumentation Division at ASTRON, PO Box 2, 7990 AA, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands cDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada ABSTRACT The Multi-site All-sky CAmeRA MASCARA is an instrument concept consisting of several stations across the globe, with each station containing a battery of low-cost cameras to monitor the near-entire sky at each location. Once all stations have been installed, MASCARA will be able to provide a nearly 24-hr coverage of the complete dark sky, down to magnitude 8, at sub-minute cadence. Its purpose is to find the brightest transiting exoplanet systems, expected in the V=4-8 magnitude range - currently not probed by space- or ground-based surveys. The bright/nearby transiting planet systems, which MASCARA will discover, will be the key targets for detailed planet atmosphere obs ervations. We present studies on the initial design of a MASCARA station, including the camera housing, domes, and computer equipment, and on the photometric stability of low-cost cameras showing that a precision of 0.3-1% per hour can be readily achieved. We plan to roll out the first MASCARA station before the end of 2013. A 5-station MASCARA can within two years discover up to a dozen of the brightest transiting planet systems in the sky.
    [Show full text]
  • KELT-25 B and KELT-26 B: a Hot Jupiter and a Substellar Companion Transiting Young a Stars Observed by TESS
    Swarthmore College Works Physics & Astronomy Faculty Works Physics & Astronomy 9-1-2020 KELT-25 B And KELT-26 B: A Hot Jupiter And A Substellar Companion Transiting Young A Stars Observed By TESS R. R. Martínez R. R. Martínez Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-physics B. S. Gaudi Part of the Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons J.Let E. us Rodriguez know how access to these works benefits ouy G. Zhou Recommended Citation See next page for additional authors R. R. Martínez, R. R. Martínez, B. S. Gaudi, J. E. Rodriguez, G. Zhou, J. Labadie-Bartz, S. N. Quinn, K. Penev, T.-G. Tan, D. W. Latham, L. A. Paredes, J. F. Kielkopf, B. Addison, D. J. Wright, J. Teske, S. B. Howell, D. Ciardi, C. Ziegler, K. G. Stassun, M. C. Johnson, J. D. Eastman, R. J. Siverd, T. G. Beatty, L. Bouma, T. Bedding, J. Pepper, J. Winn, M. B. Lund, S. Villanueva Jr., D. J. Stevens, Eric L.N. Jensen, C. Kilby, J. D. Crane, A. Tokovinin, M. E. Everett, C. G. Tinney, M. Fausnaugh, David H. Cohen, D. Bayliss, A. Bieryla, P. A. Cargile, K. A. Collins, D. M. Conti, K. D. Colón, I. A. Curtis, D. L. Depoy, P. Evans, D. L. Feliz, J. Gregorio, J. Rothenberg, D. J. James, M. D. Joner, R. B. Kuhn, M. Manner, S. Khakpash, J. L. Marshall, K. K. McLeod, M. T. Penny, P. A. Reed, H. M. Relles, D. C. Stephens, C. Stockdale, M. Trueblood, P. Trueblood, X. Yao, R. Zambelli, R. Vanderspek, S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ultrahot Neptune in the Neptune Desert
    LETTERS https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-1142-z An ultrahot Neptune in the Neptune desert James S. Jenkins 1,2 ✉ , Matías R. Díaz1,2, Nicolás T. Kurtovic1, Néstor Espinoza 3, Jose I. Vines1, Pablo A. Peña Rojas1, Rafael Brahm 4,5,40, Pascal Torres4, Pía Cortés-Zuleta 1, Maritza G. Soto6, Eric D. Lopez7, George W. King8,9, Peter J. Wheatley 8,9, Joshua N. Winn 10, David R. Ciardi11, George Ricker12, Roland Vanderspek13, David W. Latham14, Sara Seager 12,15, Jon M. Jenkins 16, Charles A. Beichman11, Allyson Bieryla 14, Christopher J. Burke12, Jessie L. Christiansen 11, Christopher E. Henze16, Todd C. Klaus16, Sean McCauliff16, Mayuko Mori 17, Norio Narita 18,19,20,21,22, Taku Nishiumi 23, Motohide Tamura 17,20,21, Jerome Pitogo de Leon17, Samuel N. Quinn14, Jesus Noel Villaseñor12, Michael Vezie12, Jack J. Lissauer 16, Karen A. Collins 14, Kevin I. Collins 24, Giovanni Isopi25, Franco Mallia25, Andrea Ercolino25, Cristobal Petrovich26,27, Andrés Jordán5,28, Jack S. Acton29, David J. Armstrong 8,9, Daniel Bayliss 8, François Bouchy30, Claudia Belardi29, Edward M. Bryant8,9, Matthew R. Burleigh29, Juan Cabrera 31, Sarah L. Casewell 29, Alexander Chaushev32, Benjamin F. Cooke8,9, Philipp Eigmüller 31, Anders Erikson31, Emma Foxell8,9, Boris T. Gänsicke8, Samuel Gill8,9, Edward Gillen33, Maximilian N. Günther 12, Michael R. Goad29, Matthew J. Hooton 34, James A. G. Jackman8,9, Tom Louden8,9, James McCormac8,9, Maximiliano Moyano35, Louise D. Nielsen30, Don Pollacco8,9, Didier Queloz 33, Heike Rauer31,32,36, Liam Raynard29, Alexis M. S. Smith 31, Rosanna H. Tilbrook29, Ruth Titz-Weider31, Oliver Turner30, Stéphane Udry 30, Simon.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheres of Hot Alien Worlds
    Atmospheres of hot alien Worlds Atmospheres of hot alien Worlds Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof.mr. C.J.J.M. Stolker, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op donderdag 5 juni 2014 klokke 10.00 uur door Matteo Brogi geboren te Grosseto, Italië in 1983 Promotiecommissie Promotors: Prof. dr. I. A. G. Snellen Prof. dr. C. U. Keller Overige leden: Prof. dr. C. Dominik University of Amsterdam Prof. dr. K. Heng University of Bern Prof. dr. E. F. van Dishoeck Dr. M. A. Kenworthy Prof. dr. H. J. A. Röttgering Ai miei genitori, per aver creduto in me, permettendomi di realizzare un sogno Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Planet properties from transits and radial velocities . 2 1.2 Atmospheric characterization of exoplanets . 4 1.2.1 Atmospheres of transiting planets . 4 1.2.2 Challenges of space- and ground-based observations . 7 1.2.3 Ground-based, high resolution spectroscopy . 8 1.2.4 A novel data analysis . 10 1.3 Close-in planets and their environment . 10 1.3.1 From atmospheric escape to catastrophic evaporation . 12 1.4 This thesis . 12 2 The orbital trail of the giant planet t Boötis b 17 2.1 The CRIRES observations . 18 2.2 Data reduction and analysis . 19 2.2.1 Initial data reduction . 19 2.2.2 Removal of telluric line contamination . 19 2.2.3 Cross correlation and signal extraction . 21 2.3 The CO detection and the planet velocity trail .
    [Show full text]
  • The Multi-Site All-Sky Camera (MASCARA)
    A&A 601, A11 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630319 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics The Multi-site All-Sky CAmeRA (MASCARA) Finding transiting exoplanets around bright (mV < 8) stars G. J. J. Talens1, J. F. P. Spronck1, A.-L. Lesage1, G. P. P. L. Otten1, R. Stuik1, D. Pollacco2, and I. A. G. Snellen1 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Received 22 December 2016 / Accepted 9 February 2017 ABSTRACT This paper describes the design, operations, and performance of the Multi-site All-Sky CAmeRA (MASCARA). Its primary goal is to find new exoplanets transiting bright stars, 4 < mV < 8, by monitoring the full sky. MASCARA consists of one northern station on La Palma, Canary Islands (fully operational since February 2015), one southern station at La Silla Observatory, Chile (operational from early 2017), and a data centre at Leiden Observatory in the Netherlands. Both MASCARA stations are equipped with five interline CCD cameras using wide field lenses (24 mm focal length) with fixed pointings, which together provide coverage down to airmass 3 of the local sky. The interline CCD cameras allow for back-to-back exposures, taken at fixed sidereal times with exposure times of 6.4 sidereal seconds. The exposures are short enough that the motion of stars across the CCD does not exceed one pixel during an integration. Astrometry and photometry are performed on-site, after which the resulting light curves are transferred to Leiden for further analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Echo Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory
    The science of EChO Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory Giovanna Tinetti & EChO consortium UK, France, Italy, Spain, MPS Germany, Poland, Denmark, Ireland,Un. Liege, Portugal, Hungary, US ~850 Exoplanets! Radial velocity, Transit Surveys Microlensing, Direct detec. ESA-GAIA -> 104 new planets! 1 The science of EChO – ROPACS ~250 Exoplanets (+x000 candidates) Radius, Mass & Orbit 2 The science of EChO – ROPACS 16/11/12 Exoplanets for which we have spectra: < 20 H2O, CO, CH 4, CO2, Na etc. identified, but data are sparse, degeneracy of interpretation Swain et al., 2009 3 The science of EChO – ROPACS 16/11/12 EPSC-DPS 2011 TESS PLATO E-ELT HUBBLE CoRoT VLT Finesse Early years The present The golden future 2000 2005 2010 2020 EChO Spitzer GAIA JWST Kepler Cheops SPICA 4 Big picture? 5 The science of EChO – ROPACS EChO Exoplanet Characterisation Observatory ESA M3 mission candidate – March 2011 ESA Science Team ESA EChO Study Team ØG. Tinetti ØK. Isaak ØP. Drossart ØL.Puig ØO. Krause ØM. Linder ØC. Lovis ØG. Micela ØM. Ollivier ØI. Ribas ØI. Snellen ØB. Swinyard Gaseous planets formed elsewhere and migrated Planet formation Energy budget C/O ratio Albedo/thermal emission Planet-star interaction Photochemistry+ Weather Day/night variation Temporal variability/ T-P profile Planet evolution + Escape/H3 8 The science of EChO – ROPACS 16/11/12 Terrestrial planets formed in situ? Or remnant of gaseous planets’ core? Primary or secondary atmosphere? Does the planet have H2 retained or not an atmosphere? Energy budget Spectral observations Albedo/thermal
    [Show full text]
  • Inferring Atmospheric Characteristics from Transiting Exoplanets
    Inferring Atmospheric Characteristics From Transiting Exoplanets Jean-Michel Désert Caltech - Sagan Fellow Sagan Summer School, July 26th 2012 jeudi 26 juillet 2012 Inferring Atmospheric Characteristics From Transiting Exoplanets Image credit: THIERRY LEGAULT Jean-Michel Désert Caltech - Sagan Fellow Sagan Summer School, July 26th 2012 jeudi 26 juillet 2012 Inferring Atmospheric Characteristics From Transiting Exoplanets Image credit: THIERRY LEGAULT Jean-Michel Désert Caltech - Sagan Fellow Sagan Summer School, July 26th 2012 jeudi 26 juillet 2012 I) From Transits (Eclipses) Depths to Atmospheric Signals II) Pushing Observational Limits III) New Frontiers for Atmospheric Studies 4 jeudi 26 juillet 2012 Atmospheric Structure jeudi 26 juillet 2012 Atmospheric Structure [Adapted from Fortney 2008] jeudi 26 juillet 2012 HD209458b: 12 years of transits ★ First transit: 2 -2 (Rp /R* ) ~ 10 [ Charbonneau et al. 2000] ~ 1.6% [ Henry et al. 2000] 1.27±0.02 Rjup Updated from Winn et al. (2008) 7 jeudi 26 juillet 2012 HD209458b: 12 years of transits ★ First transit: 2 -2 (Rp /R* ) ~ 10 [ Charbonneau et al. 2000] ~ 1.6% [ Henry et al. 2000] 1.27±0.02 Rjup Updated from Winn et al. (2008) 7 jeudi 26 juillet 2012 HD209458b: 12 years of transits ★ First transit: 2 -2 (Rp /R* ) ~ 10 [ Charbonneau et al. 2000] ~ 1.6% [ Henry et al. 2000] 1.27±0.02 Rjup ★ First atmosphere: 2 -4 (atm /R* ) ~ 10 NaI 0.0232 ± 0.0057 % [ Charbonneau et al. 2002] Updated from Winn et al. (2008) 7 jeudi 26 juillet 2012 HD209458b: 12 years of transits ★ First transit: 2 -2 (Rp /R* ) ~ 10 [ Charbonneau et al. 2000] ~ 1.6% [ Henry et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for Planning TESS Extended Missions
    Considerations for planning TESS Extended Missions This document is intended to be a useful reference for those who are planning and proposing for TESS Extended Missions. It is a repository of ideas, questions, and links to relevant work regarding possible Extended Missions. The intention is to capture and organize ideas from the TESS Science Team in order to expedite and facilitate decision-making and proposal writing. An extended mission offers the chance to re-examine our top-level science priorities, sky scanning pattern, selection of short-cadence target stars, allocation of data volume between "target stars" and full-frame images, and many other mission parameters. Given the broad range of possibilities, we hope to gather input from a broad community of Co-investigators, Collaborators, Working Group members, Guest Investigators, Engineers, and other interested parties. The Simulations Working Group has prepared a memorandum (Bouma et al.) about 6 specific scenarios for a one-year Extended Mission. The scenarios are: 1. HEMI, which re-observes one of the ecliptic hemispheres in essentially the same manner as in the Primary Mission (i.e., neglecting the zone within 6° of the ecliptic); 2. HEMI+ECL, which re-observes one of the ecliptic hemispheres, but this time covering the entire hemisphere at the expense of the continuous-viewing zone near the pole; 3. POLE, which focuses on one of the two ecliptic poles; 4. ECL-LONG, which has a series of pointings with the long axis of the field-of-view along the ecliptic (in combination with some fields near the ecliptic pole, when the Earth or Moon would prevent effective observations of the ecliptic); 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Book
    LIST OF PARTICIPANTS - INVITED AND CONTRIBUTED PAPERS - POSTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS List of participants p.2 to 4 Abstracts of oral communications Invited and contributed papers p. 5 to 83 Abstract of posters p. 85 to 122 Index p. 122 to 123 1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ADAMCZYK Michalina Toru´nCentre for Astronomy AKHENAK La¨etitia Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris ALIBERT Yann Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern ALLARD Nicole GEPI, Observatoire de Paris ALVES DE OLIVEIRA Catarina European Space Agency AUCLAIR-DESROTOUR Pierre IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris BARAFFE Isabelle Group of Astrophsics, University of Exeter BATALHA Natalie NASA Ames Research Center BAYLISS Daniel Observatoire de Gen`eve BEAULIEU Jean-Philippe Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris BENNEKE Bjrn California Institute of Technology BENNETT David University of Notre Dame BERTA-THOMPSON Zachory Massachusetts Institute of Technology BOFFIN Henri European Southern Observatory BOISSE Isabelle Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille BONOMO Aldo Stefano Observatorio Astrofisico di Torino BORGNIET Simon Institut de Plan´etologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble BOUE´ Gwena¨el IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris BOURRIER Vincent Observatoire de Gen`eve BROGI Matteo University of Colorado at Boulder BRUNO Giovanni Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille BRYAN Marta California Institute of Technology CARLEO Ilaria Astronomical Observatory of Padua CASSAN Arnaud Institut dAstrophysique de Paris CHABRIER Gilles Centre de Recherche en Astrophysique de Lyon CHARBONNEAU David Harvard Center for
    [Show full text]